Newbie 2051: Iceland! - End!
Forum rules
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
This is a really bizarre angle. Why does having an individual read/vote depend on others having posted?In post 46, safebet222 wrote:
So how can you have a serious vote of 3 people haven't even checked in?In post 40, floo wrote:VOTE: flow trap
This is at least a partially serious vote. Don't want to discuss why right now.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I'm not really a fan of openly declaring a vote a pressure vote. Even a naked vote is better.
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I don't really get why there's a question mark there. I'm asking about what you were thinking during your first two votes. "Because I was pretending to be new" is a deeper purpose in contrast to the "Nothing" you originally gave.
Looking at page 4 and the posts around here you seem to be annoyed by the votes on you. Looking at your comment about being an experienced player, you might need to recenter to first principles. Being dismissive of questions doesn't really help as either alignment. It's better to be straightforward and eliminate the guesswork.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
In post 91, safebet222 wrote:
See... Told you no one would hammer.In post 90, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:VOTE: safebet222
Random Fact about Iceland: Iceland has gone to war 3 times over cod from 1958 to 1976.
UNVOTE: flow trap
So if your motivation for voting was to get reactions, what was your motivation in unvoting? You had a vote up for 18 minutes, with only 2 non-flow trap players posting. It's also just bizarre to assert that you were "making a point" but immediately describe a motivation that doesn't make a point when asked why you voted.In post 99, safebet222 wrote:
Reactions... Gotta have reactions to start getting somewhere.In post 97, esotericzoomer wrote:Where's your motivation to do that as town? There's no positives from dancing around flow traps wagon like this.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I'm actually not inclined to give this slot time to recenter.In post 89, flow trap wrote:Can we not kill the experienced player?In post 91, safebet222 wrote:
See... Told you no one would hammer.In post 90, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:VOTE: safebet222
Random Fact about Iceland: Iceland has gone to war 3 times over cod from 1958 to 1976.
UNVOTE: flow trap
I strongly doubt the third post in light of the first.In post 92, flow trap wrote:I was tempted to- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Can you be more specific as to what makes this feel like not town v. town to you? I don't like flow individually but that conversation as a whole seems plausibly TvT to me. It also looks like you don't have a specific one in mind, as neither are your top scumreads.In post 254, Spartan117 wrote:I feel like there is 1 scum between Flow trap Vs Sal.
I don't see it as Scum Vs Scum, and it just doesn't feel like Town Vs Town to me.
Other than that my main scum reads are EZ who I feel is being disingenuous in relation to that early waggon and has felt fake in some of their posts, and Fredrick who has been lurking and still yet to provide any meaningful content, could be typical scum trying to stay under the radar while still seeming active.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
My eyes kind of glazed over on the last few pages. I don't really have a read on floo but their early vote was good despite the criticism it got. Salsabil/Enchant are both gut townleans.
Sorry for flooding the thread a bit, should be responding more contemporaneously/measured in the future. Probably going to vote flow but I want to chew on it for a bit.
Last thing I'll do before I head out is talk a bit about myself as a player and some theory.
Spoiler: About me
Normally I don't like to talk theory but since this is a newbie I think it's appropriate to give general advice. I want to weigh in on the "Scum don't want attention" bit. Getting away from safebet's vote specifically, while you can usually get away with this in a game filled with weaker or newer players, I would really caution leaning on this reasoning. We might be able to get away with it this game, but it's a timebomb that will get you absolutely rolled in a table of stronger players. Even in this game, though we have some lesser posters we don't have any outright lurkers. Even the ones with lower counts-like floo-have had posts that take initiative. Treat players as individuals, gauge what you think THEY are capable of as scum rather than relying on something overly general.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Spartan, re: 339 I agree that these interactions are good for Salsa and questionable at best from flow. I think there's a big difference between that and the interaction being necessarily TvS, though. At this point with flow trap I don't really think I'd be surprised if he flipped either way.
VOTE: Frederick
Concur that the vote hop wasn't great. Safebet's posting the last few pages was okay.
floo's explanations have been like,fine. I want to townread the slot but can't really say they've done anything strongly AI.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I really hate to be blunt but it's better I do it now than later.
flow trap, you need to put your ego aside this game. It's getting in the way of you being effective and are making you elim bait.
You've taken the exact same dismissive attitude to players repeatedly throughout the game. Your explanations for why range from lackluster to promises of galaxy brain plans. Stating that you're not vulnerable to bias due to experience misses the entire point of bias.
I support you pressuring for a read but I don't support you continuing to be evasive/dismissive of concerns and questions under the guise of big brain. It forces me to guess whether you're being egotistical, malicious, or both.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I think Enchant came off a lot better reading realtime-you (Esoteric) seem to be reading in ISO. I wouldn't call him town but a lot of the filler was either relevant or pretty natural posting, ex. joking about lolhammers after expressing caution about them.
I'm really curious about this:
I called a similar issue out with Spartan in 311 and 421. When asked why it's TvS, he gave more resaoning as to why Salsabil individually was town and flow individually was scum rather than they were diametrically opposed. I don't think you touch on this in your wall. Spartan isn't a bad alternative right now.esotericzoomer wrote:
If I'm reading this right and the language barrier isn't fucking this up, Enchant pulls a random "one of them is scum" situation out of his ass, very much disapprove.In post 415, Enchant wrote:Yes. I said exactly that, not "They probably not maf both, but one of them surely there".
-0.5- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I really don't like 459 from safebet. This comes right off the heels of esoteric's great wall of reads but the thinking doesn't really add up to me.
The treatment of SEs is wildly inconsistent. The townlean on me for my content is qualified by my SE status, but Spartan does not get the same treatment. He scolds Frederick and sees him as playing below what he's capable of but the result is....null.
What changed to you about flow trap, safebet? You didn't really take issue with flow trap's reaction at the time. 129 has you looking at esoteric and Spartan. I'm concerned because you've spent a ton of time disagreeing with esoteric's theory but flow_trap got a pass until the consensus was against them.
flow trap is still being themselves but they've noticeably gotten more comfortable in their own skin and pressed forward with trying to solve. The pairing chart was also so out of left field at a time when they had more important things to worry about as scum.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Frederick, what is your current thinking on safebet?
I'm skeptical of your voteswitch to floo. You seemed to have a reason you placed some belief in on safebet. For floo, it looks like your vote was prompted by discussion around the fear of appearing scummy comment. It's really rare to see someone admit to insecurity in perception early in RVS-this is exactly what scum is trying to avoid displaying-and I read it the complete opposite way as +town. I can get this from a beginner but as someone who's been around the block a few times, does your experience not match mine?- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I gut townread posts like 126 and agreed with her side of things more with flow_trap. Being right unfortunately doesn't make her town but I don't want to vote her so far. Posts asking about reasoning for pushing safebet pinged town to me given that she had just outed a TR on safebet shortly before.In post 483, Enchant wrote:What you think about Salsa?- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Going through your ISO Enchant it's not clear to me what your thoughts are on her. You've spent a lot of time responding to her interrogations regarding terminology/which ones you should know.
Where are you at on her?
Has anything changed since 395 where you didn't have any scumreads, just the initial ping on flow? I'm curious about Frederick/safebet.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
So, uh, was that it for the night or is there more on the way?In post 480, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
Yes.In post 385, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 381, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
What was the point of this post?In post 259, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 254, Spartan117 wrote:I feel like there is 1 scum between Flow trap Vs Sal.
I don't see it as Scum Vs Scum, and it just doesn't feel like Town Vs Town to me.I'm town for sure.Are you asking me?- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Is there a reason you're trying to alleviate the pressure I'm applying?In post 490, flow trap wrote:I mean they do have 7 days
If you think it's a bad push, explain why. Saying this just gets in the way for 0 reason.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Okay, what shifted?In post 491, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I am actually null on safebet222.
For the second paragraph I'm saying that from my experience scum generally doesn't openly admit to being insecure about how they're perceived, which was the issue you quoted before voting floo.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I don't think I can simplify the second paragraph further.In post 191, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
You are worthy of my vote. Hence, my vote is on you.In post 187, safebet222 wrote:So Fred... What do you think of the reactions so far? Do you still think I am deserving of your vote?- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Actually I'll try directly quoting
I am saying I directly disagree with this, particularly Salsabil's reasoning here. I think this is a natural thought for relative beginners. I am wondering why someone who has been around the block more often agrees with this.In post 211, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
I third that.In post 209, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 150, Enchant wrote:
I probably ask something nonsense, but really want.In post 139, floo wrote:
Right, as I explained I said it was "partially serious" to avoid seeming scummy / too random.In post 136, Spartan117 wrote: Found this sus to even insinuate it is somewhat serious a vote this early on with such little discussion, unless ofc this is to obtain a reaction and read responses.
Why you think placing votes suspicious? Do you really care how suspicious are you?
Of course explaining votes is good, but doing that and claiming you did that just to don't seem suspicious for that is really something strange.
Town supposed to push suspicious people, you know.I second that. Not your vote but your explanation is suspicious : "to avoid seeming scummy"
At this level I don't see any scum openly admit to being insecure about their appearance with 0 prompting, because scumfear being perceived as selfconcious- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Again it puzzles me as to why you're diffusing questions and answering for him. I'm well aware of other motives. It is my job, and yours, to trace his thought process and figure out how legitimate those are. 499 is asking to elaborate on why he voted if my reading-that he didn't actually suspect safebet-is correct.
All you have to do is wait and see if his answers line up to you. You're shooting us both in the foot right now, arguably all 3 of us.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Going to have to do more than naked vote if you want this to gain traction.In post 166, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Your vote below has given me nothing to respond to. To elaborate, I don't even know why you are scum reading me and, hence, do not have a basis to say that you do not have a reasonable suspicion on me.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
My evaluation of the safebet vote was more of a coin flip first guess, it's naturally scummy but also an easy target to vote if they're town. I didn't at all expect for you to claim it was truly random. I don't really know what to think there. The floo vote I really didn't like on account of you being more experienced (ie. being able to restrain that first instinct about floo's "I didn't want to appear scummy" line)
The vote on me was nice and dramatic but you're not outing reads and claiming to randomly vote on page 26. It's also just bizarre to claim the vote as truly random-you had something you wanted from me in the next post.
This is a tough position to put me in. You're not hardscum at all, mainly by virtue of keeping your cards extremely close. Simultaneously, the better alternative to me is probably safebet and maybe Spartan, the latter of which is a project I was hoping to do tomorrow.
At what point are you planning to really enter the game with your vote and your opinions?- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
It was nice of you to invite me here and to offer to postpone, but I'm also skeptical that it was an accident given that I gave no indicator that I was around reading, let alone posting.
It might be nitpicky but the fact you instantly responded to me showing up a bit annoyed but took more prompting to engage with the reasoning you asked for is suspect to me. Maybe this is you being nice but you also seem to have already understood a decent part of my vote despite framing the question like my reasoning was unknown?
Like, you chose to A)randomlyvote me B) immediately followup with a question you kinda already knew the answer to and C) invite me to a dialogue with a very tight window, with every expectation that I wouldn't be here to answer. Fortunately or unfortunately, I'm an obsessive who struggles to stay away.
Need to drive home now, I'll check on what Frederick says but then I'm probably going to bed. I'll get to anything else anyone asked me tomorrow.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Hey, I'm really sorry I couldn't get to this yesterday.In post 599, Spartan117 wrote:
Can you explain your read of me compared to Enchant, why am I the better vote? Why do you think I am scum?In post 598, Prism wrote:Don't have time to really read today, prefer the Spartan vote to Enchant one. I'm probably not going to get more out of Frederick, safebet was top scumread but will wait on replacement. Might swap vote tomorrow, might keep it.
Why was Safebet your top scumread? Personally I he is a townread of mine I'm going to have to re-evaluate once he is replaced.
Enchant and you are both kind of dart throw gut reads. Enchant was pretty comfortable at the start and his thought processes have mostly been fine in my book, the questioning floo in 150 is one example. esoteric was right that he was a bit fillery but in context I think he's just conversing, not really going out of his way. The worst thing he's done to me is put flow trap at E-2....which was fine.
With you I didn't like the explanation for the "I feel like there's at least 1 scum in these two" comment about Salsabil/flow trap. Your explanation seems to just suggest Salsabil town and flow trap scum-and flow trap wasn't even in your top reads and you were voting outside.
Declaring something as likely TvS is one of the few things I ask about immediately as a hard rule. It's not a superb tell, but it's great to force people to justify it immediately regardless. As scum it forces you to justify it rather than chain miselims/let the 1v1 continue without interdiction. As town I need to get you to drill down and pick which one is scum, or realize neither have to be, instead of leaning on one of the easiest bad assumptions to make in the game. You were my third vote choice so you'd be more of a compromise than my first choice, if that's what you're worried about.
For safebet, I know he's been replaced and will get to that in a bit, but I didn't like the clashing motivations he had early on and the read wall he gave. (Post links are my explanations). I never got explanations from him on any of these and now I never will.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Rereading 136 I agree and think this post was better than I gave it credit for in my early readthroughs. I'd caution townreading 339 in that this came more from me grilling him on it than organically.In post 652, Salsabil Faria wrote:His post 136 gives me townie vibes about him first, very detailed about what he thinks and why he thinks; His interaction with me in post 266 indicates that he was trying to understand my point of view; His interaction with you also indicates that he was trying to understand you better; Post 339 is constructive, also very detailed, indicates that he takes our 1v1 conversation seriously (though I think you're a town most probably, despite being a pain in the *** ); His conversation withFredrick A Campbellgives me town vibes too, I agree with post 359 for this matter; His interaction withesotericzoomer(specially, post 547 and 560) gives me some new perspective to think but I still townreadesotericzoomerat the moment.
I actually concur on 547/560 being a lot better than I gave credit for at first glance.
I went into this with the intention of kind of taking down the TR but Spartan can actually move up here.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Spartan, I get why you scumread Esoteric at the time of 547/560, but I think esoteric had a point in that he could make jokes about being townread and such while pushing his scumreads simultaneously. You have a point that he should probably fight harder for a top SR before settling for a lower scumread but do you think this is implausible as town?
I kind of have the polar opposite reaction to his early reaction to the E-1 which is unfortunate but I found the wall insanely town. Writing for its own sake isn't town but you can see him actively using the math as a way to put the pieces together, he's not just throwing one liner reactions out. This was at a time when he would naturally have needed to sort as town but was far from getting eliminated as scum.
I guess a good starting point here for working together might be: Why do you think safebet is town?- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
In general you're right to be cautious! I'm primarily a chat player, and we tend to have tone down to a science. Just reading and thinking through the game doesn't make me town, either.In post 661, Enchant wrote:You are too talkative for quiet person, quiet. Welcome.
About Prism. I want to think he is town for now. There's reasons stated before.
But 10 years of experience is something. So, he can hide well. I will think he is townie, but watch his steps.
That said, I am human like anyone else, and if I'm scum I have to be opportunistic or manipulative at some point.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
For quiet, unfortunately you can't really answer for your predecessor but for why I scumread your slot, the two posts I link to Spartan here explain it:
Did you have any scumreads after rereading? I think the only reads you've outed so far have been townreads one/Salsabil, and I think flow trap, Esoteric, and Spartan are all worth taking a look at.In post 735, Prism wrote:For safebet, I know he's been replaced and will get to that in a bit, but I didn't like the clashing motivations he had early on and the read wall he gave. (Post links are my explanations). I never got explanations from him on any of these and now I never will.
I get that it's a lot to read in a day, and you will probably have time overnight if you don't get to it today. Welcome, and I'm glad you find me town and that you're also a Kacey Musgraves fan! I'm a big fan of the cover and looped the album for most of 2019. It's still a favorite. I wouldn't really try to answer for your predecessor here; if you're town hopefully I can see it at some point from your own play.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Looks like the post links didn't copy over, here you go:In post 735, Prism wrote:For safebet, I know he's been replaced and will get to that in a bit, but I didn't like the clashing motivations he had early on and the read wall he gave. (Post links are my explanations). I never got explanations from him on any of these and now I never will.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I agree on this front. What stuck out to me was the comfort to continue behaving erratically/big brain even as he got progressively more and more flak for it. Assuming Enchant is scum, I just also don't think he ever puts that vote down to begin with, let alone bothers to random vote me after Enchant claimed.In post 742, quiet wrote:Flow trap: towny vibes. I can think of some reasons why scum do the “I’m going to make 3 even wagons and see what happens” play, but I think it’s something town does with more frequency. This is pure gut, along with some other interactions I recall liking, but couldn’t quote if you asked. I’ll be looking to make a better read when I go back to the start on my laptop. Flow trap also pings me as experienced, which means I have to determine if I’m able to note AI stuff from them day1 at all.
I thought the reaction to safebet's vote was decently town but it was the read wall that really prompted me to foreclose any chance of voting the slot, I don't know if you've seen it. I might scope out an Esoteric scumgame to make sure he hasn't done it before but even at very advanced levels of play, that level of effort and commitment to sorting is +town. I can see scum gimmicking it but reading the wall just made that unlikely to me. You can noticeably see his thoughts progress as he goes. The math obviously doesn't work out cleanly, but the entire point was to force himself to sort and make decisions/commitments, and I think the shines through.In post 742, quiet wrote:Esoteric: I don’t even recall the slot. That’s not great on my end, I should probably remember at least something about every slot. Either I was just very distracted during my first casual read, or they’re lurky. Without going back, that leans scum to me, but that’s by far my worst impression.
I also just don't ever see a reason to vote this slot w/ Enchant scum, 0 reason to bus here when Frederick is still under pressure and I'm scumreading your slot which was a top SR for him.
I get that. I've just posted a lot about him, I don't really agree with his reads at all and am still pretty wary. His reasoning has gotten better. I think he makes a decent Enchant partner given the pushes elsewhere.In post 742, quiet wrote:Spartan: I think my take on Spartan is probably colored by all the other takes I’ve seen about Spartan. Without looking back, null. Nothing pinged me so hard I took note of it, I remember being interested in some of their back and forths, I just don’t feel like I know enough to give a good impression rn.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I'm trying to get away from meta-ing, but I'll probably check the game you linked out at some point if it comes to it.
So I have a big wall of tips here.In post 743, quiet wrote:What is the most productive way for me to engage as town? This game has, like, three players whose style I’m already interested in adopting bits and pieces of. The readability (as in legibility) of this game is great, in a way that my posts just...are not. I’m too rambly.
Spoiler: Big wall- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
??? Have you read the selfhammer?
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I'm going to try to keep out quotewalling here.
I think my safebet arguments were a bit different and more specific than those presented-most pressure was just for the E-1-but I don't think it substantially matters much so I'll leave it. I think this point specifically is worth revisiting because I highlighted two things: First, his treatment of me in comparison to you and Frederick was very questionable. Why is the townread on me qualified by my experience while yours isn't, and why is Frederick is null if he's significantly underperformed?In post 746, Spartan117 wrote:I don't like 475 pressuring Safebet, they dont like safebets read post from 459 and states the thinking doesnt add up but doesnt expand any further on it only questioning the vote on flow trap.
I touch on this in my tip wall to quiet just now but I put a lot of stock in progressions, and I think progression on flowtrap had a lot of gaps that needed to be filled in, iirc he did not comment on any of the things he was citing as they were happening, only in the conclusion of the read wall.
I concur for the most part on Frederick and appreciate you swapping off Esoteric. I know you spent a lot of time already, but if you're curious I think you should read more of Esoteric's posting around the time of the wall, which it doesn't look like you had time to do.
Let me know if there's any other reads you want to talk about when you finish reading.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I think most people are, and despite how fancy my progression evaluation often looks on paper, I have a knack for getting 1/2 scum only to eliminate multiple town and hard defend a scum with better consistency.In post 752, flow trap wrote:Typically I'm at least mildly inconsistent tbh
Teamwork makes the dream work. Different styles and different angles help dramatically. I do think there are some "wrong" ways of thinking/playing, as you've seen, but my way has its blind spots, whether that becomes apparent this game or not.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Currently catching up but I want to echo the above from quiet.
It's worth fighting when you think there's something AI to be found there. I don't think arguing attitude is giving us much of anything anymore.
Salsabil, I appreciate you being willing to recognize that it's unproductive and to take the step back.
For flow trap, while I think my perspective is clear, the last I will say even if you're right about all of your ideas/conceptions/motivations, something is preventing you from communicating and working effectively with several of the other players. If nothing else, figuring out how to work together effectively should be a priority. Being right means nothing if you can't carry it through, and you'd be surprised how often greasing the wheels of communication actually does net good townreads. You want the other town players to work with you rather than around you.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I thought this was town. I would've hoped he'd taken a moment to really reevaluate, but the fact he just kept on being himself told me the attitude was probably legitimate. Keeping it up in the wake of negative feedback as scum would be a very nuanced approach I wouldn't expect at this level.In post 797, quiet wrote:also, I’ll note that flows response to Prisim’s post was more...flow being flow. Little one liners, quick statements. The form culture shock and arrogance as a defense mechanism were both nice touches. I read flow has enjoying themselves, and the response NAI like every other thing they’ve done. Sound like a broken record, I’ll probably not post about that slot any further today.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I don't really like this post in light of the post you're quoting with 823? 823 suggests scum/town alike will both wagon without issue, and so there's no info from an Enchant townflip, while this post is suggesting that scum will instantly jump on if it's a townflip. I both personally disagree with this and think it's inconsistent-mafia needing to vote it is info, even if they don't I think it's info based off of why they justify not doing so. If it's a free elim mafia don't have to vote it, and are actually incentivized to avoid it. Whiteknighting town slots is one of my most common scum tactics and I catch others doing it all the time.In post 826, quiet wrote:
This also makes me feel even better about elimming them, as I would think if they were not mafia, this wagon would be over and done with and we'd be in the night faze already. Like in a townEnchant world, mafia has a totally free elim just waiting for a vote.In post 823, quiet wrote:Their self-vote openclaim Mafia Goon makes them so suspicious that literally anyone can vote them without looking bad.
In general I like the effort/teamwork emphasis you've put on the game but I'm worried that scumQuiet is taking the approach of "Spit out every reaction now, worry about implications later." Assuming your partner is Enchant you may not have any other choice. - Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism