Open 804: Popcorn Mafia Redux [Game Over!]
Forum rules
- RLotus
-
RLotus
- RLotus
-
RLotus
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
I had a thought, maybe it could be smart to do a democracy system on the first shot? Like, have the votes actually matter so that we can gather information. Otherwise, we are really relying on people to keep giving their thoughts in order to make any association reads, and even then it's not that dangerous for mafia to "bus" their partners because they don't have to substantiate their reads.
On the other hand, maybe that is dangerous since the mafia have a significant portion of votes to begin with.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
Norfolk was a bit strange as others seemed to picked up on. I think in general having resistance to being shot is scummy. Well town shouldn't be trying to be shot, but like I'm not worried about getting shot at this point if you get what I mean. If that is a strong scum indicator for him in particular idk.In post 34, Duchess wrote:RLotus. Do you have any thoughts on any other players so far?
A side note, I think town lurkers are going to be a detriment to us in this set up. I mean they already are in normal games, but at least in normal games lurkers' votes tell a story. But in this the votes don't really matter. Same thing with NM really.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
Really? I think saying that you don't want the gun is scummy as opposed to towny, on the surface.In post 36, SirCakez wrote:Norfolk's posting just seemed excessively LAMIST to me
Whemstar who is asking to be shot is LAMIST in my mind.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
They seem to have town's interest in mindIn post 41, WhemeStar wrote:
Why do you townread #28? I am getting scum vibes from it.In post 30, RLotus wrote:Duchess town- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
by shootingIn post 117, WhemeStar wrote:
How does town choose gunbearer? Am I missing something hereIn post 115, Dunnstral wrote:After this point town gets to choose all the gunbearers (unless godfather is hit)- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
I'm liking what I'm seeing from Mush, his convictions are very strong and seem authentic.
I don't mind WhemeStar anymore, I think his reactions to the pressure was fine. Nothing very AI was said, but a small townlean for him for having towny vibes.
A couple people said they didn't like STT's post, but I thought it was very towny. His perspective just seems to be lining up with how I'm seeing the game. Firstly he mentions how suspicious it was when Norfolk went quiet (easy observation to make at this point, sure). Then he said he liked mush's effort but didn't like his reasoning on whemestar, which I agree. He arrived that whemestar is towny, albeit for different reason than me, but I agree. Also I had the same thought about why people shouldn't be reading dunn town. Dunn's reaction to this calling it shade was a little weird, so slight town points to Imperium for pointing that out. Overall, I think this is a town perspective.
At first I did think Duchess was towny, but after wheme said the stuff about how Duchess' post was fluffy I kinda saw what he was saying. But, this post is really what freaked me out with them. He directly sheeped the reads I was having at the time which makes them seem disingenuous. Along with the fact that he had all the opportunity to give a read about norfolk but waited until others explained their read of him. With his read on whemestar, I think he was jumping the gun in calling it an act. All he had said at that point was "shoot me" and some nullish things. While saying that you want to be shot is LAMISTy, I don't see how you can come to the conclusion that it is an act based just on that. How Duchess so quickly jumped on that looked very scummy to me. And the way he has focused on Whemestar makes it seem like they are diverting attention away from Norfolk. This association might be a reach, but it feels strange to me anyway.In post 52, Duchess wrote:To me Norfolk looks like he is overcompensating for something he did that he knows looks scummy on the surface, so I agree with both of you if that makes any sense. I also agree that Whemestar's eager attitude looks like an act to me.
Duchess + Norfolk is my best guess right now, not supremely confident in that, but yeah. Duchess being the scummier of the two imo.
VOTE: Duchess- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
I'm mainly referring to their first post about how everyone should vote. It looks meant to appear as if they are invested in the game without actually committing to any reads. In hindsight it looks even worse given that he supposedly reads norfolk scummy yet didn't bother giving a read on him even though every post that norfolk made between the start of the game and when Duchess called him scummy were posted before Duchess' "fluffy" post.In post 169, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:I haven't seen anyone but you and Wheme talk about Duchess posting fluff. I'm seeing the opposite there. You'll need to explain how it's fluffy.
Well, it mainly comes from a general vibe I'm getting about the gamestate. It seems to me that several people are pushing onto Norfolk and naturally scum are trying to push into a different direction. Duchess' seemingly disingenuous push onto Wheme fits the bill. Again, I can very well be wrong, it's a preliminary read. But, there does seem to be something strange going on in that area.In post 169, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Also, it's not even ten pages and 48 hours in and you're making associative reads? PUBLIC associative reads, no less? I'm also gonna need you to explain /that/ for me.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
Yes I convey doubt when I give that read because there is no solid information at this point and it is very hard to be confident in a read this early, but it is the best lead I've got at this point.In post 178, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:I have thoughts about this half too, but I'm going to save the nitty-gritty details while I watch how others react. I'll summarize vaguely like so: I believe someone could believe this, and I believe you think you believe it, but I don't believe you /actually/ believe it. I smell doubt.
I see what you mean about not having substance in their very first post, but it is indeed fluff. Read it how you will.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
You don't have even an inkling on who may be town?In post 242, Imperium wrote:Unwnd, cakez and not mafia because we’ve played together before
Do I get an A?- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
His reactions to Mush's pressure were composed and reasonable. And he seems to be in opposition with Duchess who I think is scum.
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
I honestly had the same thought just now
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
unwnd is completely null to me. I just find it strange how quickly they came up with that.
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
If we shoot the godfather the gunbearer also diesIn post 263, Imperium wrote:Got it.
My question is wondering if I’m misunderstanding the mechanics. I’ll reread.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
There has been a lot of conversation around Norfolk so seeing his alignment would help solveIn post 274, Netflix and Chill wrote:What would flipping Norfolk clear up lotus?- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
his analysis of the game seemed to come from a town prespectiveIn post 275, SirCakez wrote:Why STT?- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
exactlyIn post 288, Imperium wrote:I mean in any case he’s either nervous scum or nervous town, and I thought it was odd that everyone just kinda landed on obvious nervous scum, so there’s either people looking for an easy push or there are bussers about.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
Yeah I had a rethink about that and take that part back, Norfolk indeed has just not been saying anything.In post 322, Duchess wrote:Norfolk Boy has made 4 posts and Whemestar has 46, so your last point about diverting attention definitely does not apply to me. If there is anything diverting attention away from Norfolk, it is Norfolk's own lurking.
I do still think there is some funny stuff going on between you and Norfolk tho- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
Agreeing with me is not explicitly scummy no. But the way you did it made it seem like you were jumping onto others' reads instead of forming your own opinions.In post 321, Duchess wrote:Can you explain why agreeing with you is scummy behaviour?
Yeah, I disagreed. Whemestar hadn't said enough in my opinion to warrant the read you gave on him about putting up an act.In post 321, Duchess wrote:As for my opinion of Whemestar, did you disagree at the time? This was the third page of the game, so of course I will not make any convictions or accusations as strong as those I hope to be capable of making later in the game.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
I'll explain what I meant with the first part. Sircakez called what Norfolk was saying about not wanting to be shot LAMIST. I pointed out that I don't really think that it is LAMIST, but something like what Whemestar was saying about wanting to be shot is LAMIST. Essentially, I'm saying that the "default" thing for town to say is that they want to be shot and the "default" thing for scum to say is they don't want to be shot. Not that Whemestar was necessarily scummy but that sort of thing is what I consider LAMIST in this setup.In post 332, Duchess wrote:You said he was being LAMIST. That explicitly implies some kind of an act or show or desire to be seen.
To your first point, and to a great deal of the assumptions you made when you voted me, I say that is simply not how the game of mafia works. If everyone ignored everyone else's opinions except to argue, there would be no consensus. If everyone only ever posted about their own original thoughts, there would be no discussion. You have yet to explain why my behaviour in that scenario was scummy, and the post where you voted me reads to me like justification for scumreading me you found after the fact.
For the second part: Ok but you haven't givenanyoriginal thoughts. And, it wasn't apart of any discussion. You framed your reads as if they were your original thoughts, when in reality they were half hearted reads on the back of observations others had made. I don't see how this is a good defense for the things I pointed out about you.
Not usually. I never said or thought that you were committed to your reads, if that is what you are implying.In post 335, Duchess wrote:RLotus. How often do you see players of either alignment committing to any reads in their first post?- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
do you have any scum reads?In post 435, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:In regards to the 3 players to save question,right now i'd only save Not Mafia, because I love him. There's no pro town evidence from anyone other than Netflix at the moment.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
Another read on the back of mush.In post 407, Duchess wrote:I don't like this one bit. Cakez seems way too concerned about how his reads are perceived, like he doesn't want to risk knocking over something he has carefully constructed.
Another vague/half hearted read in an attempt to OMGUS. It really just looks like you are pushing where is convenient as opposed to having your own convictions.In post 404, Duchess wrote:I don't understand what the next step is in this line of thinking. This response was very quick, but I fail to see how it connects to your conclusion.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
Mmmm, I'm not really sure specifically who looks better/worse. I said this because there is definitely something strange going on with how people are reading Norfolk. To me, it seems like he is being bussed because of the little resistance he is getting on reads on him. Or, scum are chasing an easy miss. I believe you said you thought this earlier as well. I guess I would tend to believe the people who are very openly pushing hard on him would be bussing so they can get the credit. While people who say they find Norfolk scummy but aren't adamant about him being shot more likely want the missed shot.In post 355, Imperium wrote:
This is a bad response.In post 277, RLotus wrote:
There has been a lot of conversation around Norfolk so seeing his alignment would help solveIn post 274, Netflix and Chill wrote:What would flipping Norfolk clear up lotus?
Give me specifics - what would flipping Norfolk solve? If a lot of people suspect someone them flipping town just means that people were wrong. Are there people you think Norfolk can't be aligned with? Are there pushes that you are more likely to double back on if Norfolk flips town?- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
I just explained this to youIn post 517, Duchess wrote:RLotus. You say I am scummy for saying Whemestar's early play was an act. You yourself said he was being LAMIST. These are the same thing. Please explain yourself.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
Virtually everything you have contributed have been questioning without stating any opinions, or piggybacking on other people's pushIn post 517, Duchess wrote:I have absolutely given original thoughts. If someone has a similar thought to me, I would not simply state my own opinion without trying to collaborate or brainstorm with that person. But to say that I have not given any original thoughts when you are the one who seems to have the biggest problem with them is a scummy push.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
another empty readIn post 518, Duchess wrote:You do not believe this push. What you are saying does not make sense.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
He did not mention that post in particular but he said that he scum reads cakez. And then you come in to give a generic uninspired read about cakez, like how you did with every scum read you have given, well except the one on me.In post 522, Duchess wrote:Where did Mush talk about that post or present any of the same specific thoughts regarding it? I'd like you to show me please.
I explained it to netflix when they questioned me about it. It is like you aren't actually trying to evaluate the things I've said but trying to push back on me to defend yourself.In post 522, Duchess wrote:That is not a read at all, I am obviously prompting you to explain yourself. I would still like an explanation as to why unwnd's entry gave you the idea that I am the Godfather?- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
These are not the same thing at all. I said that the things that he said are what I would consider LAMIST, but not that he had scummy intentions behind them or that he is being deceitful in some way. You said that he is specifically saying these things as if he is faking something. I seriously doubt that you can't see a difference after I already explained.In post 523, Duchess wrote:You are missing what I am saying. I saw your explanation. I am not near satisfied. Read my words. You called him LAMIST. I called it an act. These are the same thing. This makes me scummy, and it makes you...?- RLotus
-
RLotus
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
...In post 546, Imperium wrote:I wouldn't mind a Norfolk shot- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
boringgIn post 552, Imperium wrote:My rack and stack is basically useless at this point so I won't be partaking in your game either D:- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
I thought your whole thing was that you dont read Norfolk one way or the other really, but are against him being shot because you are using other people's reads of him to solve them. I guess I misunderstood all that.In post 554, Imperium wrote:Feel free to read our page-long exchange with Cakez.
Or any of our posts, really.
And you also seemed to disagree with me that solving Norfolk gives us a lot of information.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
My point isn't that you can't make up generic reads about the people you supposedly think are scummy, because that is what I am saying you are doing. Same thing you did with WhemeStar and Norfolk. You saw that other people are scum reading them, add in your fluff, and frame it as your original thought (I previously said this is what you are doing). That is what is scummy.In post 595, Duchess wrote:She didn't mention that post, so you are pushing me on my original thoughts, correct?
You said this was a read "on the back of mush". Now you are doubling back and claiming it's still scummy that we both scumread him despite having different reasons, all while claiming that I am piggybacking people's reads without contributing anything of my own? It's like Imperium said, you can't have your cake and eat it too. There are so many logical holes in your read of me that I struggle to see it coming from an honest approach to the game, and rather from a tactical positioning against a potential town leader.
The reason I am falling deeper and deeper in the Duchess is scum hole is because you are being disingenuous with your responses to me. Instead of engaging with the core of my arguments against you, you are focusing on finding "loopholes" or verbal trip ups in my case against you. For example, why is it that every scum read you give comes directly after someone else gives a read of that person? Can you expand on your reads more so that they don't seem like half hearted one liners with the purpose of piling onto someone else's read?- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
What about the way im pushing?In post 666, Imperium wrote:
There’s a part of me concerned about some theater there. Nacho doesn’t quite like the way lotus is pushing there.In post 659, SirCakez wrote:I think there could be a scum in Duchess v Lotus but honestly their posts are so blah to me I just can't get a grasp on it at all.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
If Imperium is scum, why do they need to look good regardless of the outcome, since they would know the outcome of course?In post 652, SirCakez wrote:Now it's looking like a non-zero chance Norfolk is getting shot here. If he flips red then you can say you were never actually defending him. If he flips town then you can say you were correct with your defense and go after the people you were shading in the wall. Regardless of outcome, it sets you up for the future. And it doesn't feel like a genuine opinion, but an out.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
me tooIn post 740, unwnd wrote:It's not my shot but I'd probably kill duchess here- RLotus
-
RLotus
- RLotus
-
RLotus
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- RLotus
-
RLotus
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
If I shoot you and then you miss your shot we lose.In post 956, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:
My reads are generally terrible. I always believe in them, though and i'd do my best. Plus, it'd sort my alignment and narrow down people's scum pools.In post 952, petapan wrote:norfolk why are you okay with being shot here if your reads are generally terrible, you'd have to make a shot that is potentially game-ending
Honestly, read what Not Mafia did to me in Large 231 and how I read it. That game is still ongoing, but the part i'm referencing is long since over.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
Yeah I read it, why do you think the reads list thing makes him scum?In post 961, Imperium wrote:hey lotus did you read my stuff on STT bc i'm a rly good scumhunter and i think i caught scum- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
If you don't mind yeah. I thought his analysis of her play was accurate, but maybe not AI like he says.In post 965, Imperium wrote:I also have no idea why people liked his Mush meta read - that was a bunch of hot garbage and I can break it down via wall if such a thing would be useful to you.- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
I thought your presumption was Cakez was town, and him and you have a dichotomy. But I don't see any indication that Norfolk is interested in shooting you or Cakez.In post 968, Imperium wrote:
I don't get what you mean here.In post 966, RLotus wrote:Don't you think he would just attack the TvT dichotomy if he is scum?
I think he's setting up SvT dichotomies between Norfolk/Cakes/me, not TvT dichotomies. - RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus
- RLotus