[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 12556323 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null TM 2021 Large Normal 2: Wikipedia Integer Facts (Over) - Mafiascum.net
seeing as I am a STRONG INVESTIGATIVE ROLE i would immediately counterclaim that because there's no way that there are TWO strong investigative roles in a large normal
I was actually considering this last game, I was a personal watcher - that's a regular watcher except I couldn't see factional abilities (the scum kill) - I was on the fence about whether my role was a cc to tracker, I saw Titus' soft and was originally planning to target them (see if they get roleblocked), decided I'd go for xtoxm that night if they lived (try to catch a roleblocker)
Really the correct decision was to elim xtoxm through claim and for nobody to cc
coming into the game I was trying to keep an eye out for people who were quick to try and recreate the "vibes" of last game but either felt like they were forcing it or just felt distinctly different from last game in how they went about it. Very start of this game has ythan, hopkirk, okapoka, hercule, and IV talking the most. There's no actual content here but it's the type of memey early back and forth that creates (dare I say) good vibes between people and that scum wouldn't hate to establish a foothold in (like hercule had so pointedly done at the very beginning of last game).
off the bat I do agree that hercule feels different this game. He's less shy about directly interacting with people so far and I vaguely liked that he was the one that took the initiative on the meme xtoxm wagon. I don't think his change in approach or tone are things that he wouldn't necessarily be able to do as scum, and I think watching to see if he's able to keep this same type of energy up over a longer period of time will be most indicative for him, but for now I'm comfortable putting him slightly above everyone else.
ythan was who I originally landed on as feeling somewhat suspicious out of the starting meme/vibe/hangout group. just a purely gut reaction but he felt more on the outside looking in and #83 in particular just felt like kind of a forced way to match his energy to the thread. Reading back now though, I don't really see his posting so much as trying to cement himself within the vibes (whatever the hell that actually means) as just poking around rather nonchalantly. He doesn't post that much and doesn't seem particularly desperate to be "in the vibes" which is my new term for people trying to get themselves in the early meme town block I guess?
I actually do lean town on Hopkirk. I won't go into details but I was having a terrible day at work so I think it's at least a little town indicative that Hopkirk and Hectic were sensitive to me feeling a little more dour than usual today? At least, I feel like it should be town indicative. I'm not really giving the same points to Mastina given she came in after Hopkirk and her approach feels a little less curious/thoughtful than Hopkirk's wtr to my slot. although I don't scum read her.
innocent villager I ended up switching my vote to after just one too many posts that I felt were... a little forced? Like to me, the "hahaha I'm scum no I'm not let's be silly guys" stuff was fun for the first few pages but IV seemed intent on continuing it for just a bit longer. It just felt like it crossed the line of someone trying too hard to continue the vibing shit posts while also making it 100% explicit that "I'm just shit posting guys." I dunno, just slightly more self aware than everyone else who was casually shit posting.
It also felt like an intentional choice? Is that a right read IV? It stood out to me and I'm wondering if you were trying to accomplish something specific with the "guys I'm scum" shit posts or if you just didn't want to let go of the fun
Also I'm not sure I vibe with your jump on Cephrir as I think interpreting "don't post your reads list every page" as "Cephrir must hate mastina's reads" feels like just looking for something to attack
I don't have any real thoughts on anyone else yet. OkaPoka feels the same as last game but I don't think that actually means anything for their slot. I thought the worst's pop in was kind of weird on a gut level? but I assume that's just because duck hasn't read the game yet.
This is a thoughtful post and I agree with the contents
I don't think there's a lot to get good reads off of before this post
I'm open to Cephrir being town this time but he's going to have to show it in a way that I can interpret, because his current posting makes me want to say don't townread him so fast
Though I can understand him not liking mastina being a real thought, even from last game where he was scum
coming into the game I was trying to keep an eye out for people who were quick to try and recreate the "vibes" of last game but either felt like they were forcing it or just felt distinctly different from last game in how they went about it. Very start of this game has ythan, hopkirk, okapoka, hercule, and IV talking the most. There's no actual content here but it's the type of memey early back and forth that creates (dare I say) good vibes between people and that scum wouldn't hate to establish a foothold in (like hercule had so pointedly done at the very beginning of last game).
off the bat I do agree that hercule feels different this game. He's less shy about directly interacting with people so far and I vaguely liked that he was the one that took the initiative on the meme xtoxm wagon. I don't think his change in approach or tone are things that he wouldn't necessarily be able to do as scum, and I think watching to see if he's able to keep this same type of energy up over a longer period of time will be most indicative for him, but for now I'm comfortable putting him slightly above everyone else.
ythan was who I originally landed on as feeling somewhat suspicious out of the starting meme/vibe/hangout group. just a purely gut reaction but he felt more on the outside looking in and #83 in particular just felt like kind of a forced way to match his energy to the thread. Reading back now though, I don't really see his posting so much as trying to cement himself within the vibes (whatever the hell that actually means) as just poking around rather nonchalantly. He doesn't post that much and doesn't seem particularly desperate to be "in the vibes" which is my new term for people trying to get themselves in the early meme town block I guess?
I actually do lean town on Hopkirk. I won't go into details but I was having a terrible day at work so I think it's at least a little town indicative that Hopkirk and Hectic were sensitive to me feeling a little more dour than usual today? At least, I feel like it should be town indicative. I'm not really giving the same points to Mastina given she came in after Hopkirk and her approach feels a little less curious/thoughtful than Hopkirk's wtr to my slot. although I don't scum read her.
innocent villager I ended up switching my vote to after just one too many posts that I felt were... a little forced? Like to me, the "hahaha I'm scum no I'm not let's be silly guys" stuff was fun for the first few pages but IV seemed intent on continuing it for just a bit longer. It just felt like it crossed the line of someone trying too hard to continue the vibing shit posts while also making it 100% explicit that "I'm just shit posting guys." I dunno, just slightly more self aware than everyone else who was casually shit posting.
It also felt like an intentional choice? Is that a right read IV? It stood out to me and I'm wondering if you were trying to accomplish something specific with the "guys I'm scum" shit posts or if you just didn't want to let go of the fun
Also I'm not sure I vibe with your jump on Cephrir as I think interpreting "don't post your reads list every page" as "Cephrir must hate mastina's reads" feels like just looking for something to attack
I don't have any real thoughts on anyone else yet. OkaPoka feels the same as last game but I don't think that actually means anything for their slot. I thought the worst's pop in was kind of weird on a gut level? but I assume that's just because duck hasn't read the game yet.
Hercule was also quick to gain townreads early last game
If he rolled scum again he could easily look different to look town
People started cluing in on him as the game went on and discussion about other peoples' alignments started
What I'm trying to say is that reading him off tone on the first few pages is a bad idea, again
In post 410, Hopkirk wrote:without quoting five long posts, your vibes feel off here. you seem overly manic in a way that feels kinda fake/trying to look overenthusiastic
Dunn said something similar (using less words) about an early post of mine in the cancelled game. He was wrong, and so are you.
Uh.. I didn't scumread you that game. It must have been an off-hand comment
I don't know where to side on lld and dgb. Not scumreading either atm, which could be incorrect. Not enthused about either vote though
I like Dannflor for town after thinking about it. I always have, but I'm less reserved about this read. I don't buy into mastina's case here
I agree that a50 looks like town. Not a strong read
I think Hercule starts looking better than what I remembered roughly around pages 30-33
Which makes me raise an eyebrow at 824 from lld, actually
UNVOTE: Hercule
I like 817 from lld, though, votes on the worst feel weird right now. I'm not townreading him but he's about null and said he'd post more later, and people have been putting new votes on him for a while now.
And the case on me in 1035 is just not good and feels more like discrediting than scumhunting (gamestate at the time had lld looking like an easy vote)
Also if you're going to say "dunn's reasoning is wrong!" you're going to have to show how
Because I'm 1 and you're 0 on me calling your alignment based on what you're calling wrong
So if you could explain how that's wrong and how it's different from last game, that would be great.
And if you're going to say that I'm wrong, but you were coincidentally scum last game, then that's still not a point against me, but you need to clear that up.
I would not mind a second day to figure shit out and then a flip choice.
I'm confident I can find them today. More confident if I have a second day to use.
But I'm willing to do it today if needed.
I may still be a fool, but I'm willing to move LLD to the TRs now. I don't think she doubles down in her own fate like this as Scum. She's a fierce fighter for survival.
Pay more attention to whether she actually follows through on it
To add to this:
They definitely would double down as scum, but that doesn't make them scum - you shouldn't be reading this as town though
Also, I don't really expect them to roll over as town and die either, the premise is dumb to begin with and is just trying to get us to follow them
I've disliked all of DGB's recent posts. Last game I was trying to remain unbiased due to me generally not liking their playstyle and ended up somewhere around null to lean town, it's notable to me that I can look at DGB and think they're scummy this game. I'd vote for them today
In post 1060, Xtoxm wrote:i dont think lld is an easy vote...i think she's one of, if not the hardest players to eliminate in this game. i doubt we'll be able to get it tbh.
dann's vote, my sense from him was that he wasn't heading toward a herc vote, so that appearing was unexpected for me.
im generally confused at how quickly this herc wagon has grown, when i dont feel its warranted, so ive been tinfoil wondering if scum are like coordinating their votes on here (like, 3 scum votes on the wagon) - this would explain the wagon speed, and dann's out-of-place looking vote would be a candidate for that imo.
LLD had 12 posts when I posted in response to your reads. Now they have 76 posts; yeah, things have changed, I feel like you're applying future knowledge to my past comment. She looked like she could have been elimmed before.
Didn't a wagon on you grow kind of quickly last game? Not from the start of the game, but from the start of the wagon. It makes sense that this game starts going quicker because we just went through a lot of probing and learning in the last game and there's more stuff to jump at now.
But you were being bussed, which is something different than a block of scum voting together on a townie
I can see herc as either town who is being pushed for not much and him having trouble in the game because he has to argue against that
OR I can see him as scum who feels caught for the wrong reasons, as pointed out by Dann and Cephrir and LLD around page 33+
I don't think their reaction is towny, at least. What I thought was towny was mostly a tone read and got town apart back to null in the next few pages, and I remember that I shifted to townreading him as the game went on last time. It seems like a fine vote to me
In post 1064, Dunnstral wrote:But you were being bussed, which is something different than a block of scum voting together on a townie
I can see herc as either town who is being pushed for not much and him having trouble in the game because he has to argue against that
OR I can see him as scum who feels caught for the wrong reasons, as pointed out by Dann and Cephrir and LLD around page 33+
I don't think their reaction is towny, at least. What I thought was towny was mostly a tone read and got town apart back to null in the next few pages, and I remember that I shifted to townreading him as the game went on last time. It seems like a fine vote to me
Thank fucking god you're town.
This is literally where I'm at right now and I'm loathe to talk much about it because the minute I stop doing the charismatic confidence bit, the hercule wagon will dissipate?
and I'm right now more certain than not he's scum... but there is a voice in the back of my head whispering bad thoughts to me, and it's talking a lot about the way the 2 wagons have progressed today, people's stances, and what makes sense for scum to do if we were both town.
Can you vibe at me wrt to that topic?
In post 1076, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Also I want to be clear that I'm doing something I've basically never done before and being transparent with my process a bit here
Which feels really fucking vulnerable and bad, so I'm really hoping that it pays off and either cures my paranoia or refocuses me in a correct path if needed.
lol
Yeah, which wagon are you talking about, the worst or yourself?
In post 1064, Dunnstral wrote:What I thought was towny was mostly a tone read and got town apart back to null in the next few pages, and I remember that I shifted to townreading him as the game went on last time.
In post 1064, Dunnstral wrote:What I thought was towny was mostly a tone read and got town apart back to null in the next few pages, and I remember that I shifted to townreading him as the game went on last time.
i can't interpret this sentence can you rephrase
torn apart instead of town apart
I'm saying that I'm not so certain on what I unvoted him for after reading other opinions on the next few pages
DrippingGoofball
Xtoxm
Dannflor
Winter Flakes
Hopkirk
AGar
jjh927 - low activity, low quality post by did drop a towntell
Titus - VLA, but I like what I see thus far
hercule - was going to say null until I caught a towntell
NULL
mastina - I have been enjoying her posts on a personal and intellectual level, I have seen nothing I would consider remotely scummy but she's not someone who can be read on Day 1.
Almost50 - he is so giddy I read his post with a helium balloon voice, I don't know if that's AI.
the worst - VLA, waiting for more info
Cephrir - was going to be in my town list but I saw a few things that pinged.
SCUM
Dunnstral - his xtoxm scumread feels like he's scum sensing a weak target and picking at him. a lot of going back and forth and fencesitting.
Ythan - low activity, meaningless posts
not-so innocentvillager - morose and demotivated, not solving
Lady Lambdadelta - aggressively discrediting players, manipulative ego post
DGB Gamestate read
hercule (7):
Lady Lambdadelta, Ythan,
OkaPoka,
the worst, Dannflor,
Dunnstral,
Cephrir
Lady Lambdadelta (5):
DrippingGoofball, hercule, Hopkirk,
innocentvillager,
Xtoxm
the worst (2):
jjh927, Winter Flakes
Dannflor (1): mastina
Almost50 (1): Almost50
Not Voting (2):
Titus,
AGar
I also glanced at the vote count after seeing dgb's reads, this thinking feels towny, even if you came to a different conclusion
In post 1247, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Dunn if you're around I want to dismantle my own wagon I think, but I need to talk to someone who I have the remotest sense of trust in to decide whether my paranoia is legitimate or not.
It also doesn't hurt my team is in my ear about all of this too so.
I'm around now
For what you're asking: if you and hercule are both town I don't know how people play it. The way things are playing out right now would have me guessing defense of hercule and pushing you, just based on my own reads
For my money, I think dgb has been playing the part where I'm reading them as either blatantly defending a buddy or defending a towny and pointing at you
In post 1064, Dunnstral wrote:But you were being bussed, which is something different than a block of scum voting together on a townie
I can see herc as either town who is being pushed for not much and him having trouble in the game because he has to argue against that
OR I can see him as scum who feels caught for the wrong reasons, as pointed out by Dann and Cephrir and LLD around page 33+
I don't think their reaction is towny, at least. What I thought was towny was mostly a tone read and got town apart back to null in the next few pages, and I remember that I shifted to townreading him as the game went on last time. It seems like a fine vote to me
Thank fucking god you're town.
This is literally where I'm at right now and I'm loathe to talk much about it because the minute I stop doing the charismatic confidence bit, the hercule wagon will dissipate?
and I'm right now more certain than not he's scum... but there is a voice in the back of my head whispering bad thoughts to me, and it's talking a lot about the way the 2 wagons have progressed today, people's stances, and what makes sense for scum to do if we were both town.
Can you vibe at me wrt to that topic?
In post 1076, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Also I want to be clear that I'm doing something I've basically never done before and being transparent with my process a bit here
Which feels really fucking vulnerable and bad, so I'm really hoping that it pays off and either cures my paranoia or refocuses me in a correct path if needed.
lol
Yeah, which wagon are you talking about, the worst or yourself?
Hercule.
In post 1247, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Dunn if you're around I want to dismantle my own wagon I think, but I need to talk to someone who I have the remotest sense of trust in to decide whether my paranoia is legitimate or not.
It also doesn't hurt my team is in my ear about all of this too so.
DrippingGoofball
Xtoxm
Dannflor
Winter Flakes
Hopkirk
AGar
jjh927 - low activity, low quality post by did drop a towntell
Titus - VLA, but I like what I see thus far
hercule - was going to say null until I caught a towntell
NULL
mastina - I have been enjoying her posts on a personal and intellectual level, I have seen nothing I would consider remotely scummy but she's not someone who can be read on Day 1.
Almost50 - he is so giddy I read his post with a helium balloon voice, I don't know if that's AI.
the worst - VLA, waiting for more info
Cephrir - was going to be in my town list but I saw a few things that pinged.
SCUM
Dunnstral
- his xtoxm scumread feels like he's scum sensing a weak target and picking at him. a lot of going back and forth and fencesitting.
Ythan
- low activity, meaningless posts
OkaPoka
****
I forgot to write his name in the scumlist but I clarified later
preface: this is the result of significant discussion between myself and auro on discord. it is not only my, or his case, it is both of ours, in my words. some elements may be influenced by auro or paraphrased.
There was a spot where they were aggressive last game
They're doing the same exact type of posting where they don't acknowledge a lot of what is going on, even stuff directed at them
I don't understand how Auro's read on Hercule makes them town
from #398 to #685, where he hops on the hercule wagon (period >24h) he comments only on us. no other opinions on the game, or other players. like dgb said earlier, we think he was picking on an easy target here. i have no doubt that after v1, scum were expecting me to be an easy mis-eliminate this game. (hell, so was i)
Reading through to page 37 I'm not like, sold on him being scum, but I can see it going either way
shit vote on hercule. he said he's happy for this to go all the way to an eliminate. but he can see it going either way.
yet, for someone expressing such a nonchalant and uncaring attitude, he sure is hard opposed to applying the same logic to another player many of us scumread.
In post 1053, Dunnstral wrote:
I don't know where to side on lld and dgb. Not scumreading either atm, which could be incorrect. Not enthused about either vote though
I like Dannflor for town after thinking about it. I always have, but I'm less reserved about this read. I don't buy into mastina's case here
I agree that a50 looks like town. Not a strong read
I like 817 from lld, though, votes on the worst feel weird right now. I'm not townreading him but he's about null and said he'd post more later, and people have been putting new votes on him for a while now.
In post 1064, Dunnstral wrote:
I can see herc as either town who is being pushed for not much and him having trouble in the game because he has to argue against that
OR I can see him as scum who feels caught for the wrong reasons, as pointed out by Dann and Cephrir and LLD around page 33+
In post 1064, Dunnstral wrote:But you were being bussed, which is something different than a block of scum voting together on a townie
I can see herc as either town who is being pushed for not much and him having trouble in the game because he has to argue against that
OR I can see him as scum who feels caught for the wrong reasons, as pointed out by Dann and Cephrir and LLD around page 33+
I don't think their reaction is towny, at least. What I thought was towny was mostly a tone read and got town apart back to null in the next few pages, and I remember that I shifted to townreading him as the game went on last time. It seems like a fine vote to me
Thank fucking god you're town.
This is literally where I'm at right now and I'm loathe to talk much about it because the minute I stop doing the charismatic confidence bit, the hercule wagon will dissipate?
and I'm right now more certain than not he's scum... but there is a voice in the back of my head whispering bad thoughts to me, and it's talking a lot about the way the 2 wagons have progressed today, people's stances, and what makes sense for scum to do if we were both town.
Can you vibe at me wrt to that topic?
In post 1076, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Also I want to be clear that I'm doing something I've basically never done before and being transparent with my process a bit here
Which feels really fucking vulnerable and bad, so I'm really hoping that it pays off and either cures my paranoia or refocuses me in a correct path if needed.
lol
Yeah, which wagon are you talking about, the worst or yourself?
Hercule.
In post 1247, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Dunn if you're around I want to dismantle my own wagon I think, but I need to talk to someone who I have the remotest sense of trust in to decide whether my paranoia is legitimate or not.
It also doesn't hurt my team is in my ear about all of this too so.
it wasn't, and you're late to the party. i feel i'm pretty obvtown at this point, and a lot of players have called me town.
In post 1572, Dunnstral wrote:I would like to better understand why lld is currently being wagoned and where else we should be wagoning
for someone who has taken a hard stance of being opposed to the lld wagon, why has it taken so long to ask this question?
part 2
: dunnstral is playing his scum meta
we've done a fairly deep meta dive on dunn, and we believe we've found a characteristic of dunn's scum play. it is present in this game.
we did an experiment of this by having me pull links in dunn's game history direct to his iso, ones that we hadn't looked at before, and showing them blind to auro. auro would try to make a read on dunn using only his iso. i showed him 5 games of psuedo random alignments. some of them he was confident in, and called quickly, a couple he said he was unsure and guessing a little - but he called all of them correctly.
when dunn is town he provides insightful reads that are well explained. when he is scum, this is not always the case, especially early in the game. he is prone to making blanket statements such as "i like [player]" with little or no justification. as town, he just goes straight into explaining his positions. auro looked over these iso's, with a focus on identifying non backed up blanket statements. the tell itself is not absolute - there are some instances of him doing it as town - but they are much rarer. people may cheery pick these to refute our case, but i'll reiterate: auro called dunn's alignment correctly every time.
instances of dunn doing it this game:
In post 1053, Dunnstral wrote:I like Dannflor for town after thinking about it. I always have, but I'm less reserved about this read. I don't buy into mastina's case here
In post 1055, Dunnstral wrote:And I do like Dann, Ceph, jjh, and to a cautious extent lld
In post 1571, Dunnstral wrote:The worst/Winter Flakes/Titus: This group feels unreadable for me; I want to say there's probably scum in this group
could auro have gotten lucky with 5 consecutive guesses? well, maybe. but 5 in a row is pretty long odds. auro seems to be pretty good at meta reading dunn, and he has a heavy scumread on dunn this game.
i have been reluctant to post our case, as im worried about dismantling our wagon on lld, but auro feels its time to share.
we still want to eliminate lld today
we feel this is the best flip for the game state, and we have a heavy scum read there also. we scumread both independently. perhaps this will help inform opinions on one of the players who is desperate to wagon outside of lld.
My push on you wasn't bad because you went back to playing the same way as before. I pulled back when you brought in new stuff, I said you felt more natural.
My push on hercule wasn't bad. There are (were?) good reasons to think hercule can be scum, looking at tone isn't a very compelling counter-argument.
What you refer to as waffling is me giving my opinion and trying to figure things out.
290 is decidedly not waffling, 297 isn't waffling, I'm talking about a post, 685 includes a vote and isn't waffling either, 1056 is me acknowledging that my reads aren't at 100%, so while I don't like your scumread on lld or Dann I'm not going to say you're wrong for sure because I don't know. 1053 is mostly reads, I end up siding with lld shortly after anyways. 1064 maybe, but I'm explaining why I think the vote is fine and I'm already voting them.
Active lurking: You have 1 example and it's really weak, but no I don't think that's fair to say
Meta: You're wrong, I've explained my positions; you've even quoted me doing so in my posts. To be clear, when you say I haven't given 'insightful' explanations this game, you're wrong.
As for not applying the same logic to lld; you wouldn't know whether I would or not. Maybe I will. Fact is nobody has even tried to explain the vote there so all I can do is oppose dgp's political grandstanding in thread, which happens to be wanting lld's elim
In post 1618, Hopkirk wrote:++scum
Dunn has played plenty of games with me. he's calling me scum based on specifically one of many thoughts in a catchup. he should know that that's me putting my thought process and what i'm considering on paper and he's acting like i'm 100% on reads based on one specifically chosen comment from my catchup. that's taking a specific chosen point and overly focusing on it when it's not representative of the whole, and he should know that
I'm not calling you scum, I said you lean towards scum because some of your thoughts feel fabricated
I'm not sure what I'm supposed to know, or why me saying you're scummy is scummy for me.
In post 1636, Hopkirk wrote:dann/ceph were both pushing hercule
then ceph jumped on A50s shitpush of me and Dann joined in with a naked vote that he later explained buried in an iso as basically 'i don't have as many townvibes as i want' which doesn't gel with the timing of the vote being with the A50/me conflict that he didn't comment on specifically
now they're both pushing Dunn with cases that came as basically the same time
both of their votes/pushes on me were the worst ones. oka/agar are in a similar state of their agreement with those pushes being bad
this feels like trying to save a partner
VOTE: LLD
This is a good post, but you lose me when you go to voting lld
Is lld the one doing something scummy here? no, and there's no reason to think they're specifically protecting lld other than her being wagoned right now (which there's also no explanation for)
Wouldn't it make more sense for you to directly vote the people who are doing something scummy? Scum can act scummy around town too
In post 1676, Cephrir wrote:i'll confess to finding the meta argument interesting
Are you going to take their word for it or look for yourself?
Do you think I haven't been insightful and explain-y in my reads this game?
i'm not very good at meta and auro is a more analytical type of player which might be a good approach to this game in particular given that my approach is not really working so far, so i was planning to take their word for it yes
oh look this too
but i will take a look at some point if this wagon gets more serious, i just don't expect to be very good at it either
Cephrir is demonstrably wrong at this point so pointing to him and saying "yeah this too" isn't helpful
In post 1593, Xtoxm wrote:shit vote on hercule. he said he's happy for this to go all the way to an eliminate. but he can see it going either way.
yet, for someone expressing such a nonchalant and uncaring attitude, he sure is hard opposed to applying the same logic to another player many of us scumread.
You agree with this?
I explained how lld is different. There are no
reasons
for her to be scum that was given. Me acknowledging that she can scum is me saying 'yeah, she's a pretty good player and I can't fully trust her right now with no flips'. For Hercule, there is a case laid out and points made about how he could be playing to a scum agenda. It's not the same thing.
In post 1593, Xtoxm wrote:shit vote on hercule. he said he's happy for this to go all the way to an eliminate. but he can see it going either way.
yet, for someone expressing such a nonchalant and uncaring attitude, he sure is hard opposed to applying the same logic to another player many of us scumread.
You agree with this?
I explained how lld is different. There are no
reasons
for her to be scum that was given. Me acknowledging that she can scum is me saying 'yeah, she's a pretty good player and I can't fully trust her right now with no flips'. For Hercule, there is a case laid out and points made about how he could be playing to a scum agenda. It's not the same thing.
it was odd to place a vote on that pretty dangerous wagon if you felt lukewarm about it
This is the same stance I had for xtoxm in the last game
It's not lukewarm; there are reasons that they can be scum, so I'm fine pushing it
In post 1494, DrippingGoofball wrote:Ceph, wagoning LLD has been like pulling teeth, her buddies are NOT bus'ing. We townies will have to do it without scum's help.
This probably the best argument for Scum!LLD I have seen so far. It's not a
perfect
argument (because sometimes Scum try to avoid the prevailing wagon to saw confusion when the eliminated flips Town. Some of us will want to eliminate ON the wagon and some off it, but the popular argument would always be "Scum
must
gave been on it", so 0-1 Scum on a Town flip on D1 increases the Scum win probability by like 50%). However, I can guarantee Scum are reluctant to bus LLD is she is on the red side.
I don't agree that it's like pulling teeth
Some people, like yourself, agar, are just not that fast to vote. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but that is what is being used to paint this as 'pulling teeth'
No, this is normal, and in fact the wagon sprung up really fast
In post 1710, innocentvillager wrote:prior to team mafia and 2180 my understanding of your posting was that it was very terse and one-lined as either alignment. have you intentionally been writing longer and more thought-heavy posts lately or am i just crazy? in that sense i just dont have a great sense of your meta. i think the fact that auro who is probably way better at interpreting this stuff than me can get your alignment right 5/5 times and is scumreading you here is just another thing making it more likely you are scum here fmpov
If you see me writing shorter posts and not often, and not digging deep into the game, that means I'm not interested/not engaged/don't have time to be engaged with that game yet
It's something that I do as both alignments. Activity is not a good meta tell for me, it's also not the tell that is being used here
I'm capable of posting a lot as town/scum, this is team mafia so I'm definitely not going to lurk this one out in any case
1. enters the thread with sole purpose of discrediting mastina and "eliminate players in inverse order of her preference"
2. then decides to back up this idea by saying just that my entrance was garbage
3. re-iterates that my entrance was garbage multiple times in order to get votes on me
4. rallies the thread to vote me, still with no evidence
(4.5?) big ego post about their scumgame
5. when i finally respond to her like, "ok, enough's enough let's talk" she's just like "nah lol you're caught scum"
6. when i'm like "ok well that's bullshit" she's like "lmaoooo such a scum reaction now my vote is, like, even more justified"
7. when a counterwagon forms on her, she AtEs and leaves the thread (also like, can't tell if she's mad that more people aren't voting me despite her not seeming to be sure or just mad that she's being voted)
i'm aware this is a slightly humorously uncharitable framing of her game but it also feels like a somewhat reasonable one
At this point I want dgb to point to what the case was -before- this post, but:
1-3, 4.5 I don't think is scummy. 2-3 Can come from town who is scumhunting, in particular
4. I disagree that there is no evidence. Off the top of my head she laid some stuff out/pointed to things and said it felt like scum
5-6 is fair. I don't think it's a smoking gun because where she is coming from is that if you're scum then allowing you to change the conversation/nitpick at little things she says is not something she wants to do, but he should probably be letting you speak and reconsidering if she isn't as confident as she is projecting at this point
7 idk