![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
we dont need to beat them with the power of friendship...In post 24, Krazy wrote:beating the mafia with the power of friendship can be problematic (it can be hard to reevaluate people if you don't *want* to reevaluate them) but I still would rather have that then a highly toxic game, which can occur even in newbie queue.
what did i do to deserve this? :0 people usually call me scummy d1In post 27, Krazy wrote:So far I townlean the tones of Kazyan, Marcistar, Meuh, and Harumi
i always forgetIn post 29, ItalianoVD wrote:Just to let everyone know I townhunt before I scumhunt because I suck at finding scum, so don’t just automatically scumread me because of it. PoE is my friend and should be yours too.
ahhh okai. iwish there was a thinking emoji on hereIn post 30, Krazy wrote:I don't think a new player opens the game trying to pocket me by complimenting my pfp. Not a strong resd but good enough for page 2 lol
I do agree with krazy that emojis isnt really alignment indicative.In post 38, Harumi Ayasato wrote:Does anyone else find the constant use of emoticons to come off as insincere, or is it just me?
1. I didn't really see you as pocketing, though Meuh brought up a good point. I think its something to be wary about, tho I thought you were just trying to start conversations.In post 51, Krazy wrote:The fact that I am trying to pocket (almost) the entire list is more a matter of playstyle than anything else, I'm a very pockety player as both town and scumActually, I subjectively think I'm even more pockety as town than as scum, but I'm definitely pockety as both, and I'm not sure a casual observer would notice the difference.
If I seem kinda excited about the Marci read, it's because I've been thinking a lot about a recent post unwnd made in mafia discussion about the value of tone reads, so I'm curious to see how my early game tone reads play out. I can already tell that this is going to be a game where one of my big thoughts in postgame will be about whether tone reads are good or not. (unwnd's argument was that they're just not good at all, I think they're good early game and then should be supplanted by thought process reads as there's enough content to do so)
I do have some expanded thoughts on my Harumi read but I'll hold off until she posts a bit in response to Italiano. I also feel like I should probably be posting less until the low content slots post a bit more but I'm kinda enjoying this game a lot already lol
I also thought about this a bit. Meuh if you're town you should be careful about italianoIn post 54, Meuh wrote:I personally didn't really find Italiano scummy here. This doesn't seem defensive to me, it looks more like either defendingIn post 47, Krazy wrote:In post 40, ItalianoVD wrote:What’s your definition of constant? And myself, meuh, and Marcistar all used them, so we’re all insincere?
the weird defensiveness of this post might be a little scummy too, maybe I'll move italiano out of lean townmeor trying to push on Harumi. If it's to defend me, I don't mind it, and if it's to push on Harumi, I don't really understand what's scummy about it either. If anything, early aggressiveness can be a sign of being town, right? Since it feeds discussion.
The first part of this, "I think you're looking too deep into it." I disagree with him saying, i thought krazy was fine with the talk about emojis.. but only because its such early game and its the only thing we can really talk about right now...In post 67, ItalianoVD wrote:It just so happened that three of us did it. If four of us or five of us did, I would’ve paired it as such. I think you’re looking too deep into it.In post 66, Krazy wrote:I feel like whatever it is, defending himself or someone else, pairing people together in a group of three is a bit scummy. Scum like groups of three because it makes it unclear whether they're pairing themselves with two townies or a scumbuddy.
I don’t like when people do this. Please don’t narrate and/or assume what I’m thinking (bolder) or how I’m trying to sort a player’s slot. Feels like a poor attempt to shade me. If you’d like to know what I mean or why I said something, just ask me.In post 66, Krazy wrote:He also kinda went to defend the use of emotes without really evaluating how different players were using emotes to different ends which is a little concerning.Not a super scummy post, but a little scummy
However how Italiano deals with it in this post makes it seem much more better and less reactionary IMO.In post 70, ItalianoVD wrote:I get that and I don’t have an issue with your perception, I have an issue with how you arrived at that perception. You didn’t ask me what I meant by it or try to understand what I was trying to say. So fromIn post 69, Krazy wrote:Well the question you asked was kinda indignant, like "are you REALLY implying that [three people] are insincere from emotes" (obviously you didn't write the caps REALLY but that seemed to be the implication of the question) which does seem to also therefore imply a kind of likeness. It pinged me a little but I'm not making a big deal out of it outside of explaining where I'm at on it. You know, it's page 3, so 'a ping' is about all I'm likely to get at this point anywaymyperspective, you read the comment, created your own story from it, and then based your read off of it. I’d like to think you are townie, but this doesn’t make me feel great about you.
I won't lie guys, this vote from Meuh I kinda don't like. It seems like shes moving her vote around for other peoples approval (which is what scum would essentially want to do). I think this because she switched it around onlyIn post 75, Meuh wrote:I thought about doing that, but I just felt like it was unnecessary and I didn't wanna give the host more to keep track of, essentially. Switching onto someone else to pressure them is a good idea though, so VOTE:In post 74, Krazy wrote:Meuh, given your reads list had kazyan as a good vibes townlean, why did you not move your vote after writing the list?eth0s
What you're saying here is true, but I think naturally if we talk alot if theres an inactive scum they will come and feel the need to make something big to seem more townie... but i think scum tends to slip up in moments like those..? Maybe its dumb thinking... but thats what I think is something that'll happen.In post 66, Krazy wrote:I appreciate the sentiment but it's not healthy for the game if I have too much thread presence. I tend to play in larges which tend to be more hyper-posty which can be off-putting to some newer players. I do like to be chatty and have fun but I also make a point to let the thread breathe.In post 56, marcistar wrote:3. I think you shouldn't stop talking if you can. Once the less talkative people join in, they'll be able to see that the game is indeed hella popping and itll be harder for inactive scummies to hide!! They'll have to give input eventually, while if the talking tones down, they might not feel the need to..
This post by marcistar is again really townie tho lol, but I kinda disagree. While it's true if town finds themselves town too much, then scum will not know how to generate a winnable gamestate. There is also the risk of being too insistent on townreads too early can cause them to feel stale and paranoia later on. Still... idk. Sometimes people just town yo. But beyond this, if scum lurk out then town can start to push each other because they're the only ones saying anything or generating readable content. Not that I'm really accusing our no-poster of being a lurker, I mean we're in the first 24 hours and confirmations took like 2 and a half days.
AH SHIT GUYS I HAVE A CLASS TO GO TO I GOTTA REPLY LATER THO AAA OKAY ILL FINISH REPLYING TO 66 LATERIn post 66, Krazy wrote:In post 54, Meuh wrote:I personally didn't really find Italiano scummy here. This doesn't seem defensive to me, it looks more like either defending me or trying to push on Harumi. If it's to defend me, I don't mind it, and if it's to push on Harumi, I don't really understand what's scummy about it either. If anything, early aggressiveness can be a sign of being town, right? Since it feeds discussion.
I feel like whatever it is, defending himself or someone else, pairing people together in a group of three is a bit scummy. Scum like groups of three because it makes it unclear whether they're pairing themselves with two townies or a scumbuddy. He also kinda went to defend the use of emotes without really evaluating how different players were using emotes to different ends which is a little concerning. Not a super scummy post, but a little scummy
I wanted to comment on this, but didn't have time before class.In post 78, marcistar wrote:In post 66, Krazy wrote:In post 54, Meuh wrote:I personally didn't really find Italiano scummy here. This doesn't seem defensive to me, it looks more like either defending me or trying to push on Harumi. If it's to defend me, I don't mind it, and if it's to push on Harumi, I don't really understand what's scummy about it either. If anything, early aggressiveness can be a sign of being town, right? Since it feeds discussion.
I feel like whatever it is, defending himself or someone else, pairing people together in a group of three is a bit scummy. Scum like groups of three because it makes it unclear whether they're pairing themselves with two townies or a scumbuddy. He also kinda went to defend the use of emotes without really evaluating how different players were using emotes to different ends which is a little concerning. Not a super scummy post, but a little scummy
It looks like you have your own reasons yes, but it looks like the driving force to make a different vote was because you were questioned on it. Would you haveIn post 79, Meuh wrote:My logic here was:
I don't think I need to change my vote -> Krazy mentions my vote -> I reflect on my vote -> I switch my vote, not for the reason Krazy brought up (my townlean) but because the reflection made me remember that voting people to apply pressure is usually a pretty good idea.
Yes, it was linked to what Krazy said, but the reasoning was my own, because I thought the was most beneficial to us as a town.
HUHH was i reading too fast??In post 84, Krazy wrote:@marci 81 - I don't think solving is bad at all. "X and x might be scum together" can be very productive. "Y is not scum because they're doing something a and b are doing" conversely I find a bit scummy. I think looking for associative pairings of scum teams is townie, and I call that solving.
yeye ofc i amIn post 93, Cantripmancer wrote:@Marcistar: Are you scum?
Ahhh this happens to me every single day!! If you keep the tab open when u close down ur browser, just make sure to refresh everytime you open it up just incaseIn post 95, Cantripmancer wrote:Lol...I know I hit refresh, but apparently there were 70ish posts that didn't load???? Please ignore my #93 while I catch up...
Preview edit: oh NOW the forum tells me I might want to review my post in light of new posts.
"kazy" and "krazy" kinda confused me but i think i understand the difference nowIn post 97, Kazyan wrote:You know what, yeah, this is a good take. I have been doing a lot of jabbering and pecking. I'm thinking of casing Krazy, since they've said enough to possibly develop a stronger read on them. Does that sound good to you?In post 91, Harumi Ayasato wrote:Kazy has only posted seventeen times, and quite a few of them are non-substantive, but the few that are seem to be rather focused on calling people out for things he perceives as scummy. This is probably just a playstyle thing, but it makes me wonder.
i did all caps because i was so worrying about whether i would make it to class on time so it was meant to be seen as a "zoom zoom gtg"In post 101, Cantripmancer wrote:@Marci: Why the panic attack at the end of #78? Like...what you communicated sounded fine, but the all caps craziness feels overdone.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBVrPWw ... nKaracalarIn post 101, Cantripmancer wrote:Preview edit: I will lol so hard if this is a Marci/Mueh scumteam.
I dont think its a good idea to just sit around ^.^ scum will have an easier time the longer we wait.In post 120, Krazy wrote:I kinda don't know how to solve this game with two slots MIA tbh, I could spend some time just vibing or talking about anime or something but I think there might be a rule about excessive off topic conversation.
whats iioa and npom mean??? i dont rlly understand those terms.. (and i also have a bad memory so for anyone reading this... im hella sorry if me asking questions like this is annoying, i think ive done it alotIn post 130, 2ndchosen1 wrote:I would call the emoticon debate certainly unhelpful, one thing that came up repeatedly in our last game was the discussing playstyle isn't really the most helpful thing for sorting scum.
The IIOA is certainly something but I would say NAI right now as it wasn't really distracting.
@Kazyan were the NPOM vibes from 29?
whats ur read for me? what questions do u have about me?In post 234, ItalianoVD wrote:Lol. I’m townleaning the ones I asked. The ones I didn’t ask I either don’t townlean or I have questions about.In post 233, Meuh wrote:No it isn'tIn post 232, ItalianoVD wrote:Is it not obvious?In post 231, Meuh wrote:Also @Italiano, why @ those specific people? (Krazy, Kazyan, me, Ethos and Cantrip) and exclude Marci + Harumi?my brain isn't that big
hmmm, i did not see this in meuh tbh, i thought she just forgot how to play mafia.In post 236, Kazyan wrote:Okay, I looked through a bunch of ISOs with a new mindset. Meuh is scum.
The reasons for this is that all of her votes are opportunistic, backed by shallow reads. She previously expressed suspicion about Harumi in 75 and then about Krazy in 83. In 110, she jumps on the chance to call them a team, only because I suggested it first, and pressures Krazy for an explanation. Meuh's vote moves to Harumi in 181, but only did this because she could join IVD's Harumi vote in 119--Meuh did not have a Harumi vote previously, despite a scumlean over 100 posts earlier. Meuh townleaning 2ndchosen1 in 181, but then Krazy made a hard push to against 2ndchosen1 in 191. Then that townlean reverses over the course of two posts, and she jump on the 2ndchosen1 wagons, since that's the powertown's choice. All the while, she's playing dumb with comments like in 233.
VOTE: Meuh
Stop yelling at 2ndchosen1 for being confused about proper word choice around anime girls. Yeet Meuh instead.
well then let me be a potential partner for 2ndIn post 239, ItalianoVD wrote:I have you at null, but because of what has changed for 2ndchosen for me, your post 224 makes me think you could be a potential partner, if in fact 2nd does flip scum.In post 237, marcistar wrote:whats ur read for me? what questions do u have about me?In post 234, ItalianoVD wrote:Lol. I’m townleaning the ones I asked. The ones I didn’t ask I either don’t townlean or I have questions about.In post 233, Meuh wrote:No it isn'tIn post 232, ItalianoVD wrote:Is it not obvious?In post 231, Meuh wrote:Also @Italiano, why @ those specific people? (Krazy, Kazyan, me, Ethos and Cantrip) and exclude Marci + Harumi?my brain isn't that big
i wont vote if i dont like the optionsIn post 258, Krazy wrote:Marci it will be hard to find you town at endgame if you keep not voting, we need your vote to be proactive so that vote logic is comprehensible in the game
im not super confident in harumi being scum, but out of everyone she seems the most scummy.In post 260, Krazy wrote:Why do you have ~a level~ of confidence in harumi being scum, moreso than chosen who you've indicated is null?
Really? To me, I know from one of my past games some people are very close minded on their scumreads. In that game, the person turned out town when they were eventually eliminated. So I think unwillingness to have flexibility in thought does not = scum. Unhelpful town maybe, but its not something that i think is good to scumread people based off of.In post 263, Krazy wrote:when I asked him to provide two names outside of us he refused to do so (only giving meuh outside of myself) which reflects an unwillingness to have flexibility in thought, which to me seems a bit scummy for day 1.
You didn't ask them for any null reads, you only asked for 3 reads from them. Some people don't feel a need to provide more then asked.In post 263, Krazy wrote:but he doesn't even have any nulls to show he's actively thinking about different solves or worlds. Basically it feels like he's not solving, and not solving day 1 is scummy (especially if I feel like both of his scumreads are town, which at present I do).
Heres the question you asked.In post 204, Krazy wrote:So I am curious if 2nd can present 2 scumreads outside of myself that seem plausible. That might help me read him. I also would be interested in *exactly one* top tier town from him, not three, just one.
1. i think its possible for a townie to either completely miss over the "outside myself" of your part and just end up giving 2 scumreads...In post 271, Krazy wrote:Marci I asked for two *outside myself*. In response to that he gave me two, one of which was myself.
also I'm highly tempted to ask if the reason you have six tabs open is because one is the scum pt
The ending part of this is harsh, you think they refused but did they outright refused? I thought it was possible they could've skimmed over some stuff by accident.In post 263, Krazy wrote:His solve right now is me + meuh, and when I asked him to provide two names outside of us he refused to do so.
You didn't ask for nulls from them.In post 263, Krazy wrote:but he doesn't even have any nulls
no townread on chosen, but yes i want them alive for tomorrow. i feel like theres better elims for todayIn post 282, Krazy wrote:Here's the better question -- do you *townread* chosen in a way that you *want* him alive tomorrow, marci?
i dont know if chosens town tbh, but i feel like they arent the best elim for today.In post 283, ItalianoVD wrote:I don’t think scum would fight hard to save a townie so I think the Marci/2nd connection is gonna be more like t/s or s/s. @Marci: I believe you are either mistaken or you are scum with 2nd.
I highly doubt that on Day 1 a townie would be that adamant about saving another townie without having knowledge that they are townie, so I don’t believe it’s a t/t connection. (I.e. they aren’t masons together)
what do u mean by "bat for chosen"..? are you meaning how far ill go for defending them..?In post 284, Krazy wrote:I can see scum white knighting a townie for towncred if they think the townie gets flipped despite the defense. I still townread marci from earlier in the game but I'm intrigued by how she's going to bat for chosen
didnt i attack you before i ever mentioned 2nd?In post 297, Meuh wrote:Just to make sure everyone's following, what's being discussed here is "a player (Marci/Kazyan) who defends another player (2ndchosen) by attacking the other player's attacker (Meuh) is very probably scum" and if the scenario fits that description/warrants a scumread on Marci and/or Kazyan.
In post 323, Alisae wrote:and tbh im stalking marcistar not u god
Tbh, I could always be scum white knighting chosen is a possibility, but i think everybody will need to judge that for themselves. It isn't my intention to white knight them, and if I really wanted to I would've placed them as an actual town read. I just want them to have a chanceIn post 331, Cantripmancer wrote:Also, I'm confused. I feel like Marci's defense of Chosen is being perceived as excessive, so wouldn't it make more sense to postulate that Marci and Chosenmightbe masons rather than discounting the possibility? And wouldn't the logical alternative to explain Marci's defense of Chosen if they'renotmasons be thatMarciis scum white knighting Chosen (if it's unlikely that a townie would be excessive in defending a townie)?
if chosens town I would probably do something like krazy because then it would mean town is horribly off track and needs to look into different options.In post 331, Cantripmancer wrote:would you vote to eliminate if they flipped town? What if they flipped scum?
so hes playing us like a violin????In post 334, Alisae wrote:Look Krazy ik you have to go out of your way to groom the whole playerlist but u can't be a negative influence on the playerlist you know.
the newbies here look up to you, if they started to do this in games it'll blow up on them!
waiting until they have more time to talkIn post 409, Krazy wrote:Marci like, what are you doing to make your read of chosen better rn?
this is so confusing.. is it art class time?In post 437, Krazy wrote:I kinda feel like I'm mono blue this game and you're usually a town that plays mono red but this game you feel like mono green
can u show me where i seem like this?In post 451, Harumi Ayasato wrote:{Marcistar} - bit skittish and defensive which I don't like, but it's probably a playstyle thing so eh.
Still think ur scummyIn post 453, Harumi Ayasato wrote:What are your thoughts on me right now?
I don''t hhave any thoughts on chosens alignment rn..In post 462, Cantripmancer wrote:@Marci: Since your vote on Harumi in 259 you haven't moved your vote, but you also, unless I missed something, haven't talked about Harumi other than just recently asking them about finding you skittish. You've used a lot of words to talk about why you don't think Chosen is scum, but don't seem to be trying to figure Harumi out at all. Why not?
Don't think like thisIn post 538, Kazyan wrote:It does and it is. I mean, town is probably losing this game anyway, judging by the environment, so it'll be a good example of how to think in the end.
1. my intention isnt to pocket youIn post 562, 2ndchosen1 wrote:Marci, scumlean, I've been unable to parse whether her defense on me has been about pocketing me, but it has gone on far longer than I thought it would honestly. I don't really see it as earning towncred on a flip as that'd be the first thing most would ask.
i dont see anything scummy in them ^.^ so i dont think its the best vote for todayIn post 566, Alisae wrote:Marci, what do you think about 2ndchosen
i like ur hot takeIn post 602, Cantripmancer wrote:So here's what I'm seeing: both Marci and Harumi start off null/townlean on Chosen. Marci white knights him the whole way (rather obsessively), while Harumi briefly entertains him as scum before putting him back to null. And they're attacking each other and cross-voting. So my hot-take is that they're buddies and sensing Chosen as a likely elim and both looking for some "told ya so" town cred when he flips town while also establishing some distancing from each other.
do you think it will be???In post 626, Krazy wrote: if she's town then she's going to have a hard time re-evaluating the gamestate if she's wrong on that slot.
Okay then why dont you vote me?In post 720, Meuh wrote:I think Marci is very likely our scum here, although like others have said, Harumi and Cantrip are also fairly likely
I don't mind flipping, but I hope you enjoy the result of my flip!In post 723, Meuh wrote:I think this kill could've been one made by Marci, since the kill does throw shade on me in the form of Kazyan pushing me yesterday, and since I had already mentioned that 2nd/Marci was a likely duo, putting a dent in my credibility could be a good idea. No clue why Kazyan would be specifically seen as PR, though
ofc whatever i do at this point is gonna seem scummyIn post 741, Meuh wrote:I do think this is very likely a Marci mafia, the invocation of Kazyan's read on me feels off to me, and if she likes the "person who was killed's suspicion is likely mafia" thing so much, that'd make sense with a Kazyan kill, especially since I said I thought 2nd/Marci was very likely. The general tone of her latest post reminds me of the way she played the day she was caught for fake-claiming PR in the scum game I played with her, she seems very annoyed.
i dont mind if my positioning is scummy,In post 726, Krazy wrote:lol marci your positioning there is really scummy<3
anyway who you think is maf?
excuse me while i think for a second..In post 743, Krazy wrote:Remind me of scum harumi reasoning, overall?
Its fine if you think that way, but i wouldnt throw as scum unless if i have other members alive to try to make it a "purposeful throw".In post 744, Krazy wrote:Ngl marci the vibe I'm getting from you is way more 'scum that doesn't want to wait a dayphase to lose' more than 'town pumped there's no one holding her back from diving harumi anymore'
I get you could be pressured town but you feel off to me today
Im not voting harumi because im waiting for them to get in because I realize that I could just have a mindset of "harumi scum" and be tunneling them no matter what right now.In post 745, Krazy wrote:Confused why you are not at present voting harumi
Also! I hope that bread dough does not upset your stomach
I havent so far on this site.. all my tries have been vtIn post 786, ItalianoVD wrote:@Marci @Cantrip @Harumi
Have any of you/all of you played scum on this site before?
yes i still want harumi.. i would vote her but im so confused rnIn post 861, Krazy wrote:Marci you still want harumi? do you want to vote her?
how do people see cantrip as scummy?In post 865, Krazy wrote:what are you confused by?
I wanna follow thru with my opinions tho,In post 921, Krazy wrote:Marci -- I think you did a really good job of projecting a townie tone, but sometimes when wagons stall out be a little more willing to compromise to end day with a flip. Unless you're really sure someone is town, it's better to hammer.
will you hate it if i joinIn post 0, Krazy wrote:Oh yeah, and if any of you all use discord, feel free to join the cow level -- https://discord.gg/HUDmCZB -- just an informal mafia server, not the official one
(I'm passing out right now so hopefully none of the regulars there traumatize you)
Really great list and I'd be happy to play with any of you again <3