Scummy readsIn post 110, MathBlade wrote:I think Spiffeh town BM scum Prism null LLD scum lean Cakez is prob town but scum in a very minor circumstance so not considering it. If I am right then Titus is town by proxy.
Warehouse 13: The Mafia Game (Game Over)
Forum rules
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
No I also didn't like post 164In post 164, SirCakez wrote:
This all you have to say?In post 152, Dunnstral wrote:
Scummy readsIn post 110, MathBlade wrote:I think Spiffeh town BM scum Prism null LLD scum lean Cakez is prob town but scum in a very minor circumstance so not considering it. If I am right then Titus is town by proxy.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Yeah, you are.In post 456, Spiffeh wrote:Maybe I'm calling this out too early
LLD, I would have voted for you to receive the artifact even if you hadn't claimed- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
I wouldn't expect your role to be straight VT if you received a flavor artifact at the start, would expect [modifier] townie or something
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
I'm reading you loud and clearIn post 423, Bell wrote:I'm going to need a letter from your Doctor explaining why you aren't voting LLD instantly RN @Everybody.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Is this how Prism got their artifact?In post 1, penguin_alien wrote:Other Artifact distribution mechanics may be in play throughout the game. A set number of Artifacts were designed prior to game start. If the Warehouse is unable to distribute enough Artifacts during the game for a given phase at any point, a priority list has been designated by the mod for the distribution of remaining Artifacts. Once there are no more Artifacts to distribute, no new ones will be generated and the game will continue without that mechanic in play- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
This post feels loaded and I believe you are making things upIn post 477, Spiffeh wrote:I agree with Prism that Dunn's recent activity after getting called out doesn't make me feel better.
It feels like he's trying to give the impression that he's unbothered by the pressure, whereas town!Dunnstral would probably recognize the issues with his current play and... do better?- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... ct[]=30572In post 456, Spiffeh wrote:
This is not a hot take, it's a good one.In post 326, SirCakez wrote:Hot take: dunnstral is scum again
Three of Dunny's four posts have been low effort nitpicks, and the other was a mechanics question that I didn't understand. 174 specifically doesn't sound like something town says, questioning specific players about their sangres read is one thing but shading everyone town reading them without explanation is useless. It reminds me of Titus vs. Alisae when I caught him for similar shady, nitpicky posting where he'd lurk and post full quote-wall catch ups taking potshots at random shit that never ended up forming into genuine reads or having real progression.
And while I've been scum in my three recently completed games, Dunn has been town in all of them and he it was obvious from his first few posts. That's not the case here.
Maybe I'm calling this out too early and it would have been better to see how he continues to play the game without my interference but I kinda want to try and this is me trying
VOTE: Dunnstral- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Are you saying I somehow attacked you?In post 329, MathBlade wrote:
LLD Mala Prism Bell Titus Dunn are one person. Some have stated they’ve checked out til elim phase. That’s not one person.In post 321, SirCakez wrote:
He was literally saying he was excited to play the game but was accepting that he was going to be elimmed after like one person attacked him. It was ridiculous.In post 268, Kitty Trauma Team wrote:In post 265, SirCakez wrote:Ok what's your point here? This is such a dumb thing to nitpick.
My point is that I feel like you're making mountains out of emotional molehills by calling that a meltdown, and that's a real real strong alarm bell to me.
So again, I ask you, what part of that post you quoted do you call a meltdown? Two mildly peeved posts, if even that level of annoyance is hardly a meltdown, but that's the word you used.
-k- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
So you'll slot them as scum if I flip town?In post 484, quiet wrote:In terms of negatives, besides following the logic on Dunn, who I like as a vote because it helps resolve 1.65 townies- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
The mod post I quoted answers my question. You telling me things doesn't, because I don't have a reason to believe you when you claim like thatIn post 488, Prism wrote:The question you just asked was what mechanism I got my artifact through. I answered both via quote and directly all capsing at you telling you that players can start with artifacts in their inventory. Mine ~just happens~ to be related to my character flavor. This absolutely answers the question of how it was mechanically distributed.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
You are overblowing this, I asked a question about a part of the setupIn post 490, Prism wrote:Right, well, I hope that by working together with the table you will be able to come to a conclusion on whether or not this falls under "other artifact distribution mechanisms", I wish you the absolute best of luck in your long and perilous journey.
Maybe if we're lucky we will get a mass artifact start/no artifact start claim Day 1.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
In post 492, MathBlade wrote:I wonder if there is a traitor.
Based on what?
Even mentioning this unprompted feels like possible signaling if true- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Seems about right.In post 508, Titus wrote:Math, there are at least three facepalms I see already from you, which prevent you from being effective or being the NK and increase your risk of being policied.
1) You still are not letting the thread breathe.
2) You claimed VT or strongly implied it.
3) Your setup speccing with no evidenve to do so.
4) In your rush to post, your reads are incomprehensible.
Wait a day. Then post a read wall.
I'm only suggesting this because I think your bonehead plays are anti-town but you aren't scum. Keep it up and I'll vote to policy you.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Because spiffeh looks scummy. I don't know about sircakez.In post 544, quiet wrote:@Dunn, why did you choose to push back on Spiff and not Cakez? Do you have a Cakez read?
Look at what you capitalizedIn post 573, Bell wrote:@Dunnstrall, why did you mean you read me loud and clear btw? I literally had not idea what you were referring to.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
I have not softed my role this game.In post 621, Prism wrote:Dunn is rough, the softs make me want to say town but are just bizarre.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
I was joking too, otherwise I wouldn't draw so much attention to itIn post 675, Bell wrote:That was also a joke. It was a reference to nursing because we need a bunch of doctors notes to do a bunch of different procedures. I intentionally capitalized doctor to continue the gag.
Did everyone just forgot that I told everyone in that game I don't crumb?- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
prism, bell, lldIn post 681, MathBlade wrote:Dunn, Bell, if you had to add one player to your town block who would it be?
And no repeating who the last player said.
leaning on quiet- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
In post 709, sangres wrote:
Dunn I've asked before -- please elaborate.In post 174, Dunnstral wrote:The townreads on Sangres feel weird
Specifically, whose reads, and what makes those reads weird?In post 106, Prism wrote:Spiffeh needs to do something that isn't shitposting, sangres is a townlean mainly because it's Nacho specifically voting to give me the artifact.
P-Edit: speak of the devilIn post 141, Prism wrote:Thought about it more, haven't read last page and can't atm but zero chance sangres is scum here
VOTE: Sangres
This read because it seemed like townreading someone too fastIn post 153, Prism wrote:I'm on my phone so pretty limited, but the short of it is that sangres would make a bigger show of paranoia here, which hasn't happened yet. They also respect my towngame too much to fight on my behalf out of the gate like this, let alone give me the artifact. Hard town.
Playstyle it's nice to have diversity.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Because it's something town do a lot tooIn post 720, Prism wrote:Why don't you find that scummy?- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
You should pay more attention to what I'm saying. I'm not calling it scumIn post 746, sangres wrote:If it was Prism's read that bothered you, I don't understand why you didn't push him for more reasoning then.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
I'm referring to the action.In post 749, MathBlade wrote:Please don’t call people it unless they say they are okay with it. It can be a very harmful pronoun.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Hey, I see it. I happen to think the way people are turning on you seems scummy.In post 811, Spiffeh wrote:Ok now I'm two for two on players vocally suspect coming back and saying my push was scummy. Nice.
I think bork is sidelining too hard right now with no opinion on me at all and I think Titus has felt manipulative. I think Mathblade is being too survivalistic and was just looking for a reason to scumread me and hasnt let it go.
VOTE: Mathblade
Let's keep the original wagon going instead of redirecting, we have a better chance of getting scum.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
In post 639, MathBlade wrote:
VOTE: SirCakezIn post 636, Titus wrote:
Bell is based on what? He's my highest SR currently.In post 634, MathBlade wrote:I do but if Dunn is town Titus stock goes down.
Bell is one of my few lock towns.
Come sheep me Bell.
Based on me being a day cop Titus /s
I have reasons but they’re anti town to say
This isn't "persuasive", it's manipulativeIn post 656, Titus wrote:VOTE: Mathblade
If you aren't willing to rationally discuss your reads but expect people to sheep you, I have no hope of reading you. When you don't work with people who are wagoning your scumreads because it's not your favorite, then I cannot work with you.
If I cannot read you and I cannot work with you, why keep you?- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
I don't think that is a reply to the post I am talking aboutIn post 759, sangres wrote:How do you feel about Spiffeh's reply in 516?
People are writing you guys off as town too easily when you very well can still be scum, for no reason other than you started making likeable postsIn post 759, sangres wrote:I don't think the number of posts before or after matter.
I think you could make an argument that I made a mountain out of a molehill, though.
Can you expand on this post?- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Sircakez, Battle Mage, GreyIce, and yourself
This is resistance to mathblade, not all are ok with going titus as well; most are instead tunneled on me to a frankly unrealistic degree
Sangres is honorarily ont he list because they keep directing questions at me while supposedly suspecting Mathblade but it doesn't have the same feel- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Battle Mage says this then tunnels on me in an awkward way while throwing Math townreads - I'm not that hard of a slot to read. His whole play feels disingenuousIn post 339, Battle Mage wrote:my gut feeling is we should use D1 to elim a slot which won't solve itself over time. No point elimming math early when his alignment will become obvious later.
Next is you or Sircakez distracting from Mathblade hard- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
This amounts to a self-defenseIn post 841, Spiffeh wrote:Because where I'm coming from, in the event that MathBlade is scum (which I highly highly doubt atm), it's a little hard to believe that any scum would fight for him at this point when he's dug himself a huge hole?
I would expect scum to bus him into the ground here instead of risk themselves trying to save him. And I think you're smart enough to be able to see that too.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
To be more clear:
As long as LLD is claiming mason and is going to take control of the game, I'm not going to be the wagon for today unless there is strong disagreements from multiple members of the town
So that's why all these arguments about me seeming desperate or flailing are out of place. The only way I'm getting eliminated today is if LLD thinks that is a good idea.
And like, I wasn't super obviously town at the start of the game, sure, but I become readable, and it's a hard sell to believe that everyone pushing me today is acting in good faith
So no, I'm done barking for spiffeh and sangres. No more distractions. We can talk about why Mathblade is scum if you want.
My scum reads:Mathblade,Spiffeh,SirCakez,Battle Mage,Bork,GreyIce
Last two are light reads- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Look how easily they scumread me when I pointed out that they would be the most likely traitor for bringing up traitor for what seems like no reason
And then they latched onto that and scumread me for it and kept that read; the slightest provocation set them off on that path. They are the one who looks 'desperate' as they said
Posts 492, 499, 504, 550, 554
As a sort of exercise, can you figure out Mathblade's reason for voting me?- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Let's not forget about this.In post 483, Dunnstral wrote:
Are you saying I somehow attacked you?In post 329, MathBlade wrote:
LLD Mala Prism Bell Titus Dunn are one person. Some have stated they’ve checked out til elim phase. That’s not one person.In post 321, SirCakez wrote:
He was literally saying he was excited to play the game but was accepting that he was going to be elimmed after like one person attacked him. It was ridiculous.In post 268, Kitty Trauma Team wrote:In post 265, SirCakez wrote:Ok what's your point here? This is such a dumb thing to nitpick.
My point is that I feel like you're making mountains out of emotional molehills by calling that a meltdown, and that's a real real strong alarm bell to me.
So again, I ask you, what part of that post you quoted do you call a meltdown? Two mildly peeved posts, if even that level of annoyance is hardly a meltdown, but that's the word you used.
-k- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
In post 151, sangres wrote:Have you played with Math since coming back from hiatus?
I haven't. Nacho probably has more recent game experience than me.
I'm not townreading Math.In post 279, sangres wrote:I'm going to take this under advisement because Mathblade's approach to the game, particularly that bit about 1 but not 2 scum in prism/bork gave me a nasty case of hives. Maybe you can be the counter-balance to my tendencies wrt
This is what I was looking at when I made the post.In post 697, sangres wrote:I kinda feel the same but I'm not sure how much of it comes from the Dunn wagon basically popping up as a counter to the Mathblade push.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Then I'll get math elimmedIn post 851, Spiffeh wrote:
You are severely overestimating the pull LLD has in this playerlist :lol:In post 849, Dunnstral wrote:The only way I'm getting eliminated today is if LLD thinks that is a good idea.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Yeah.In post 861, sangres wrote:
That's a pretty damn curated segment of our trajectories on Math. I'd go so far as to say "cherry-picked".Dunnstral wrote:In post 151, sangres wrote:Have you played with Math since coming back from hiatus?
I haven't. Nacho probably has more recent game experience than me.
I'm not townreading Math.In post 279, sangres wrote:I'm going to take this under advisement because Mathblade's approach to the game, particularly that bit about 1 but not 2 scum in prism/bork gave me a nasty case of hives. Maybe you can be the counter-balance to my tendencies wrt
This is what I was looking at when I made the post.In post 697, sangres wrote:I kinda feel the same but I'm not sure how much of it comes from the Dunn wagon basically popping up as a counter to the Mathblade push.
What you're not realizing is that I'm not trying to prove that you had this opinion, I'm trying to prove that when I was typing up my reply and looking over your posts, this was the impression I got. I also skimmed over something like "It's strange that we're not seeing math in the same way" which was neutral without looking into context- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
It's not omgus because I didn't call them scum. They said I attacked them somewhere but they can't point to it, and indeed I didn't even mention them prior.In post 864, borkjerfkin wrote:
you first mentioned traitor (499) after math declared a scumread on you (492)In post 855, Dunnstral wrote:Look how easily they scumread me when I pointed out that they would be the most likely traitor for bringing up traitor for what seems like no reason
this just seems like a "math is OMGUSing me" dressed up in something irrelevant, factually untrue or otherwise
Seperate point, look at 550 and try to work out what Math is saying here- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
I forgot I made this post. Looking back these were scummy readsIn post 866, borkjerfkin wrote:
Probably would've been my guessIn post 152, Dunnstral wrote:
Scummy readsIn post 110, MathBlade wrote:I think Spiffeh town BM scum Prism null LLD scum lean Cakez is prob town but scum in a very minor circumstance so not considering it. If I am right then Titus is town by proxy.
It's their justification for voting meborkjerfkin wrote:
I literally can't parse thisIn post 550, MathBlade wrote:Eg Dunn and Cakez although not voting saying meltdown- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Ask math, not me.In post 873, borkjerfkin wrote:
what does it mean then?In post 868, Dunnstral wrote:It's their justification for voting me
But it looks like they are saying that I was saying they were having a meltdown, which is not true. That could also be directed as jsut SirCakez so I'm not really sure.
This has been my argument for other people this game, but sangres/pooky and others are being SO defensive about it, like how dare I question their godreadsIn post 888, borkjerfkin wrote:Either way that seems like a criminally low bar to set- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
This does not sound like my scum play, or what you've seen of my scum play. It's also very weak.In post 874, SirCakez wrote:Dunnstral is all like "better not let this easy miselim slip out of our hands"
You just saw me in Popcorn Mafia- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
I was considering the latter.In post 870, borkjerfkin wrote:on the other hand there's been like a metric fuckton of conversation about mathblade, and you've come out on the side of "this is a concerted effort to protect a buddy" vs "some other people are seeing something different than me" and it's odd that you're just not considering the latter
But then Math made scummy posts
And the people voting me made scummy posts- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
So why is my name hereIn post 550, MathBlade wrote:
That’s what I said. That’s why towards the end (Eg Dunn and Cakez although not voting saying meltdown) are more likely scum than not mason LLD and Prism.In post 548, Titus wrote:
Free miselimination is a free miseliminationIn post 537, MathBlade wrote:Why would scum want me a let’s be generous and say below average player like me dead?- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
I'm not calling you scum. I'm saying other players are not doing enough to read you/set the bar too low/came to conclusions too fast/aren't doing due diligence, and that you're not hard townIn post 900, sangres wrote:Dunn you're making me crazy.
I hate getting into nearly the same nitpicks with you over and over again. I feel like the conflict is muddying my read, not clarifying it. Maybe the read should be more muddy.
You don't have to take that as a personal attack on you; it's not- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
I don't think the level of accountability I'm being held to is the same as other people areIn post 903, sangres wrote:What I want is accountability.
There's no accountability in saying "other players" and "started making likeable posts" without details on who and on where our posts got "likeable" so I can even know what "likeable" means to you. - Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral