newbie 2060: creatures, game ofer
Forum rules
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Demainer
-
Demainer
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
Interesting dynamics, let's see what happens from here.
Well, all questions are loaded in some form or another, at least mine makes it clear that it's loaded.In post 12, Egix96 wrote:Admittedly though, Demain's reaction is a bit of a loaded question, since as far as I'm concerned it may as well be saying, "Are you scum with dark?" which obviously no one would admit to.
Having said that, I wouldn't mind a response from Lukewarm.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmIn post 21, WhemeStar wrote:no triple hmmmmm?- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Demainer
-
Demainer
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
Enough to have a much scummier target to go for, yes.In post 57, WhemeStar wrote:So do you agree with me that you liked his posts- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
That post was meant to be tongue-in-cheek, of course day won't end this early. My point was thatIn post 66, Egix96 wrote:Why so?no onewould have the guts to dump the final vote on WhemeStar, so his E-1 argument was largely moot.
Unless early D1 majority votes are common here, in which case I stand corrected.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
You can misinterpret what I said in any way you want, but you won't bait me into saying something I don't agree with. I said I had a scummier target to go for (aka you, after you immediately unvoted once endlessdark appeared in the thread).In post 70, WhemeStar wrote:So if you agree with me that you like his posts why did you not like my unvote?
You still haven't convinced me that you're not scum.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
I saidIn post 68, Demainer wrote:Enough to have a much scummier target to go for, yes.
What does "much scummier" imply?- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
Whemestar's original post:
In post 13, WhemeStar wrote:Hihi VOTE: endless dark
I like a wagon
L-2 btw. Which means 2 more votes is a hammer which is a flip. Something we don’t want currently.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
Anything to say about the game? Any reads?
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
You unvoted immediately after endlessdark made two posts that barely said anything. Scummy moveIn post 120, WhemeStar wrote:Demainer can you answer post #40- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
And said this:
In post 33, WhemeStar wrote:I don't have any scum pings from anyone yet and thats sad;/- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
I don't find it problematic that Lukewarm posted 3 scumreads instead of 2. If he's on the scum team, then of course he'll know there are two scum in the game, so why deliberately draw attention to himself by ignoring that? Unless he wanted to make a point that he did feel that 3 players were scum, which is NAI.
And no specific preference between 3 scumreads is still a lot better than no reads at all.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
What would be the point of forcing claims right now?In post 174, endlessdark wrote:
What are you guys talking about? Lukewarm's post is sensible. The person we're eliminating obviously has to claim and it's useful information for the town. There's no getting around this and it's not a scummy thing to push the town into action a bit.In post 139, Demainer wrote:I don't understand why we need role claims so early in the game, it's only going to hurt town? Unless there are special mechanics in this setup I'm not aware of.
Not getting town vibes from that recent post.
Everyone is going to claim vanilla except for the two power roles. How does that help town at all?- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
In post 180, Lukewarm wrote:Town is more likely to win if we lynch someone day 1 compared to a no-lynch, even if its a mislynch. So I am speaking with the mindset thatis getting lynched today. If that is happening, we should give that person a chance to claim, no?someone
I am unsure what you are trying to say. Do you think that nolynch is a reasonable choice? Do think that we should not give someone a chance to claim before we hammer? I am just confused how you imagine the day playing out, without 1 person claiming their role.
That is not what you said. For reference (bolded and underlined for emphasis):
In post 137, Lukewarm wrote:Yes its page 5 (well 6 now), but we are also on the 6th irl day for our in game Day 1. Maybe I am just not accustomed to the pacing of games on this site, but it feels like we are approaching the point where we just have to pick someone. Like there is only so much info we can really gain in day 1 until we force someone to claim, no?
I am getting pretty antsy for us to l-1 someone just so we can gain new info. Force someone to claim their role, then decide if we want to actually hammer the person based on what they claim. I mean if we wait to much longer, then if we L-1 someone, and decide we shouldn't hammer them, we won't even have long to form a new wagon.
I am not necessarily saying that I think it needs to be you, I would be happy for us to L-1 anyone on my scumread list tbh, so for now, I am gonna be on the biggest wagon between Whemestar, Ivyeo and Clasko.
VOTE: Ivyeo because I have sat on the Whemestar wagon for a while, and the Ivyeo wagon is the same size, so might as well mix it up lol- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
Ivyeo and Ahri both give me bad vibes. They're posting very cautiously in the thread, Ahri hasn't said anything material at all, and Ivyeo seems to be creating an "I told you so" position to defend herself before WhemeStar's flip.
It does make me a bit less certain that Wheme is scum, because based on that, Ivyeo and Wheme can't be on the same team. But I'm sticking with my vote because I trust my gut feeling.
I feel that something is off about Clasko as well, but they've been active in the game posting reads and sharing their thoughts, so no strong thoughts on this one way or the other.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
I haven't changed my vote, that should be a clear indicator of where I'm currently at.In post 225, Ivyeo wrote:
Dem is a lean scum for me. They were pushing pretty strong on Wheme, but their most recent post was them doubting their Wheme read, followed by silence as our votes still aren't coming to a majority. I'd like to hear where they want to go now whilst we're still not fully unified.In post 223, Saudade wrote:What do you think about Dem, Ivyeo?
And what do you think about me, Ahri?- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
ahri not posting is not helping anyone, but I prefer to deal with concrete information based on threadplay rather than random guesswork. Inactivity is NAI. Also, everyone apart from ahri has been active today, so I don't see any reason to policy lynch for inactivity.In post 233, WhemeStar wrote:
Do you think ahri is helping the town more than me then?In post 230, endlessdark wrote:Also, I apologize to Wheme if I'm wrong with my vote. I can't really say I've seen something that makes me think you're genuinely helping the town. That doesn't necessarily make you maf, but it's more than what I have on others.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
I've fleshed out my thoughts on this earlier, but onto your recent posting activity - you've been targeting multiple players in the thread the past few days, throwing everything at the wall and seeing what sticks. It feels like a desperate attempt at trying to get someone else eliminated, anyone, as long as it's not you. I would expect town to be much more methodical in this situation. Or better, to not care so much about being eliminated, since we're all cannon fodder anyway, and even a miselimination can give good info.In post 246, WhemeStar wrote:Why has my posting given you scum vibes
Not saying that I expect town to want to be eliminated, no one wants to be, but at least not desperate to the point of just going after anyone you can go after in the thread.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
I don't think it is, scum is obviously trying to avoid going after someone they have substantial interaction with in the thread.
The only notable thing about ahri is that she didn't engage in the thread at all, so the kill doesn't incriminate anyone. I'll need to read back the thread to check though.
And sorry Wheme for the misread, I know I can't bring you back to life but I'll try to avenge the elim.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
If you're scumreading me for apologizing to Wheme, then so be it, it's your choice. I was convinced our scum team was Wheme + Clasko, but with Wheme flipping town I've gone back to the drawing board and re-iso'd everyone.
Lukewarm: Wheme's flip hardspews Luke as town, this is the most certain read I have so far. It's possible that Luke went for an extended scum play, but I feel that's highly unlikely given the stage at which Luke spewed.
Clasko: I went into the D1 flip thinking he was lockscum, but now I've re-iso'd him he comes off as town. It's only a lean though. His "slip" on me and Wheme does not read scum to me now, and his D2 activity has been giving me good vibes as well, I see someone trying to figure things out rather than trying to force town into a conclusion.
Saudade: I can't read him. Most of the posts are one-liners, and in the ones that do offer some insight into his position on other players, it's mostly just vomiting reads without much of an explanation. Having said that, I do get the feeling that he's genuinely trying to get a read on other folks, and I don't see any kind of tmi posting (again, could just be that he's good at hiding it), so I'm very slightly leaning town here, though I'd be more comfortable with a null read.
endlessdark: Null for me. Not getting any scum pings here, but also not seeing any evidence that they're town.
Egix96: The only thing I have to say here is that he's gone after both of my current town reads/leans, and his reaction to Ahri's death seems forced. Lean scum for me.
Ivyeo: I'm hard leaning scum on this one, her entire D1 iso is essentially fossing everyone without truly committing to any sort of read (and when asked to provide them, hid behind the "I'm bad at it, don't want to lose us the game" excuse which hardly holds, you either have them or you don't). Her single D2 post does not read town to me either, at all. There was no way Ahri's death N1 was a "great kill", it was clearly an anti-spew play (which is also why I'm considering whether we have an SE in the scum team). Simply another post that doesn't contribute any sort of hard info on the game.- Demainer
-
Demainer
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
No one voted for her because they thought she was scum. Everyone made it clear that it was a vote for inactivity. And some even townread her for not posting.In post 307, Ivyeo wrote:
How was Ahri not a good kill for town? Not only was she a VT, but she was someone with plenty of suspicion on her.In post 303, Demainer wrote:Ivyeo:\Her single D2 post does not read town to me either, at all. There was no way Ahri's death N1 was a "great kill", it was clearly an anti-spew play (which is also why I'm considering whether we have an SE in the scum team). Simply another post that doesn't contribute any sort of hard info on the game.
Instead of continuing on a tangent and avoiding the discussion today, why not actually share your thoughts on other people?- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
The identification of alignments based on posts in the thread, in its simplest sense. My point is that Lukewarm can be cleared as town based on the approach of his posts towards Wheme on D1.In post 310, Clasko wrote:
What does "spewed" mean, here? Can you, or someone, elaborate? I've never heard of that term in a Mafia game.In post 303, Demainer wrote:Lukewarm: Wheme's flip hardspews Luke as town, this is the most certain read I have so far. It's possible that Luke went for an extended scum play, but I feel that's highly unlikely given the stage at which Luke spewed.
And Ahri was selected as the scum kill because she was largely ignored in the thread, no one had any "reason" to take her out. We can't get anything from her death/flip.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
I'm trying to explain my thoughts on how scum approached the kill last night.
I don't think going after Ahri for the anti-spew was very successful, since it clears you as town (hence why I said you were hardspewed as town). But, it does limit the damage that can potentially be caused by killing someone with more posts in the thread.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
Please point to where I've asked someone to stop analyzing mafia's night kill last night.In post 318, Lukewarm wrote:And you trying to talk people out of analyzing the mafia's night kill isn't helping that perception either.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
For reference, here is the entirety of Ivyeo's activity today:
In post 291, Ivyeo wrote:That's a great kill for town no?In post 307, Ivyeo wrote:How was Ahri not a good kill for town? Not only was she a VT, but she was someone with plenty of suspicion on her.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
Emphasis on "why not actually share your thoughts on other people".
There's not much I can say if you can't see that the three sentences Ivyeo's posted in 4 days somehow all relate to Ahri and nothing else. No reads on other players. No discussion on what we should do today. No discussion on Wheme. Just Ahri.
And nothing substantial either. It's literally "that's a great kill for town no", followed by "how was Ahri not a good kill for town", then a statement which is verifiably false, as no one said they scumread Ahri after voting for her.
I'm fairly sure I've shared more thoughts on Ahri's flip than Ivyeo has.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
I am quite certain on Ahri being an anti-spew kill, not a pr hunt. But, in either case, whether it's for antispew or pr, neither option is obvious to a newbie. There are more obvious targets in the thread, like Luke, who was both active and widely tr, or an se. Killing a newbie who has barely posted anything at all isn't something I'd expect from a 2x newbie team.In post 363, fferyllt wrote:In this game, Saudade doesn't interact with his scumbuds and doesn't vote them. He said he was playing differently from usual due to out of game reasons. He trolled quite a bit.
This game is similar - very little interaction, no vote on scumbuds.
This isn't a full meta dive because I'm mostly interested in just figuring out if Demainer/Saudade make sense as a scum team given Saudade's page 7.
My conclusion is they don't make a whole lot of sense as a team given Saudade's most recent scum games.
But I definitely don't townread Bell. :/
I might wind up meta-ing a few more games.
-----------------------
@Demainer
Can you explain why you think Saudade/Ivy make sense together?In post 340, Demainer wrote:With Saudade and endless both disappearing and not posting for a while, it's a bit difficult to figure out the last scum. I can see Egix and Saudade being w/w with Ivyeo.
With Egix cleared by Clasko, that leaves saudade. while i see endless being on the team as well as it seems like he has some experience with this as well, I'm leaning most towards saudade/ivyeo.
My vote today is based on who I think has the highest probability of being scum. Is a saudade/endless team possible? Yes. But, i'm more convinced the scum team is ivyeo + saudade/endless.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
This just feels like antispew to me.In post 380, Ivyeo wrote:
I mentioned my read on Luke at the start, and that's because I didn't really have anything to say on the others that hadn't been said already.In post 362, Demainer wrote:Didn't you say you were going to share your thoughts on other players? After your last post focused entirely on me and Egix.
You said you'd reread the thread to get a read on other players, but now you're backing off.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
I've been very clear about where my suspicion lies. Please quote which of my posts point to me "just pushing whoever and saying whatever".In post 397, Bell wrote:To me it looks like he's running on autopilot, just pushing whoever and saying whatever. He is emotionally engaged, hence why Wheme seemed to think he was "tunneled" but I just think of him as like an NPC in marioparty on a stage where they just sort of run at you to try you knock you off the platform with 0 deviation or algorithmic pathing. Like an arrow.- Demainer
-
Demainer Goon
- Demainer
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 162
- Joined: March 19, 2021
So what do you think our scumteam isIn post 407, Bell wrote:I don't see any obvious anti-tunneling measures in Demainer's posts. SE's usually have those when they're trying.
What do you mean by how do I feel?
They constructed a blameless vote and argued that they were being very consistent this game with almost no trace of irony in their posts. They're very green.
Your push against Egix is off, why did you feel the need to push at him? You'd read the game beforehand right? - Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer
- Demainer