Mini Normal 2205: RotITGBSMoD [game over!]
Forum rules
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
i wouldn't assume the maf!doc is especially powerful. the ability for the informed minority to protect itself is already incredibly potent, so if there are indeed any modifiers it would probably make the most sense to me for it to be an x-shot.
VOTE: Andante because minor disagreements in phrasing = obvscum- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
277-280 from andante gave me scum vibes at first bc overreaction, but now i feel like it just reads more noob/NAI. hard to tell because no completed games so this is mostly gut. regardless i don't think my vote is best placed on her atm
weird filler vote that went completely unchallenged by osuka, followed by whatever the hell that chess/minesweeper nothingness wasIn post 82, Anya wrote:VOTE: osuka
kinda weird you'd talk about things going over your head? are those missile cruisers that you're playing to bomb us with?
this is an odd thing to say when he had already posted twice, one of which was a genuinely useful question. if you're going to attack someone for not engaging with the game, why not me? why notIn post 123, Anya wrote:VOTE: Haschel Cedricson
he's still on the plane while all the others have already jumped and started skydiving
lolIn post 141, Anya wrote:you won't be saying that once i catch us 4 or 5 wolves
no one seems to be pushing anya for posting almost exclusively filler even when there were better things to discuss. weird metaphors and non-pushes and... that seems to be it
VOTE: Anya- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
before the last couple of posts i would have said the latter but jaysus. i wouldn't expect even noobtown to get this scared and desperate this quicklyIn post 355, Save The Dragons wrote:
it's just weird. she lazily tosses out a scum read, then later says it's too early to scum read. she says she's sus of two people due to responding to salsa's reaction, but doesn't pursue either, and instead goes the OMGUS route. it seems pretty clear she did not like being targeted by Robert, but the question remains is all this nervous energy she has because she's caught scum or because she just doesn't like being targeted?In post 329, osuka wrote:
yeah that's fairSave The Dragons wrote:
could be but i already did say i was getting the heeby jeebiesIn post 323, osuka wrote:
this looks like it could be fake tooIn post 322, Save The Dragons wrote:
they look like they could be fakeIn post 315, osuka wrote:like really do 279 and 280 strike anyone as genuine? asking the room
can you put your finger on anything
@andante what about my defense of you makes you so confident i'm not scum? from your perspective, even if you assume you're town, i could still be trying to pocket you. from an outside perspective this just makes you look like my scumbuddy i'm trying to defend- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
it just felt to me like joke votes didn't need to be made anymore. by "not challenging" i meant not voting anya based on her weird minesweeper sidetrack, but i see now that you actually did at the top of page 6. for my next trick i will learn how to readIn post 365, osuka wrote:
why would i challenge a vote that is clearly a joke?In post 352, InsidiousLemons wrote:
weird filler vote that went completely unchallenged by osuka, followed by whatever the hell that chess/minesweeper nothingness wasIn post 82, Anya wrote:VOTE: osuka
kinda weird you'd talk about things going over your head? are those missile cruisers that you're playing to bomb us with?- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
you latched onto her initial "vote my townread" shitpost. it was just surprising to me that you didn't follow up when she posted something else in a similar vein. it's not like there was nothing to comment on, either -- there was a decent conversation going which anya decided not to weigh in on at all and instead post filler
probably also a good time to mention that the last game i played was a micro that i ghosted when i was 14, and even otherwise i'm not confident i ever made it past the first couple days of a game. for all intents and purposes i'm a newbie, so forgive me if i'm not too aware at first of site culture or if i accidentally use the old term for an elim etc (obv i understand the change and will endeavour to refer to it as an elim)- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
i'm pushing you for posting sidebar nonsense as discussion was just beginning to pick up, and i said as much. continuously posting cryptic fluff while people try to decipher what you mean is not pro-town behaviour. I recognize that page 5(?) is early for criticism of fluffposting/distracting from discussion, but your attempt to mischaracterize it as me pushing you for "being weird" is not a good look.In post 387, Anya wrote:insidious is pushing me for being weird rather than being wolf
VOTE: Insidious lock him up- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
if you're referring to his "reads" post, i honestly just read it as a joke. andres is scum for joking about a N0 check? osuka is town for being funny? i'm scum for only posting twice? asteria is town for being "glad to be a part" of the townbloc? these don't feel like serious conclusions to me. i don't think it's a particularly defensible entrance, but it doesn't scream scum to me either.In post 402, PawnsGambit wrote:I don't see what's good about Roberts entrance or why it's defendable.
@robert how serious was your readlist? what do you hope to gain by not voting? also, you're sort of automatically subscribed to any topic you've posted in. you can click "view your posts" in the top left to keep tabs on which threads have new posts (coloured icons instead of greyed-out ones). there's a more specific "subscribe topic" function which i believe gives you emails, that you can find at the bottom left of the page.- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
speaking of useful information, please answer my questions in 405. dodging good faith questions about your reads does not make me confident that you're actively invested in finding scum.In post 410, Robert M Hunter wrote:
Do you know that osuka is town, by any chance? If so, please let us all know, this would be very useful information.In post 408, VFP wrote:I'm going to focus here tomorrow with some read updates.
PawnsGambit deserves some pressure here.
Out right refusing to discuss reads and now just ignoring posts to them.
Adding nothing and apparently getting away with doing so?
VOTE: PawnsGambit
New player trying to stay close and call their scum buddy Osuka town the whole time, following in the footsteps, or just trying to buddy to a town Osuka thinking this will protect them?
Regardless attention should be here.
VFP wrote:
There would have to be something that makes you think "Oh, Osuka is scum hunting". What is it?In post 411, PawnsGambit wrote:I'm not refusing to discuss reads. I'm merely saying that they are light reads at this point in the game and not to be blown out of proportion.
[...]
So to re ask my question and make it clear, at what post did you feel Osuka was scum hunting?
pawniard yet again dodging a point-blank question with a one-line post devoid of any substance. i've been reading osuka as town as well, but your inability to point to any concrete reasons or posts that make you believe so beyond "he talks to a lot of people" is very troubling. a majority of your posts are less than half a line long. you're either town who's too lazy to play the game, or scum who's to lazy to pretend to.PawnsGambit wrote:I can tell Osuka is trying to sort people by conversing with a wide variety of players. This to me is genuine scum hunting.
VOTE: PawnsGambit- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
yeah what he said
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
actively scumhunting isn't die-harding, it's playing the game. we are asking you to skim through the thread and point out a tangible example of a post that makes you believe what you believe. you continue to post while ignoring that question. in fact, you've made nearly 3 times as many posts in this thread as i have. so why are they so lacking in content and so full of argumentative nothings?
p-edit nice topic change- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
also kind of scummy to miss the daddy on pagetop imo :/In post 425, PawnsGambit wrote:If you're voting me and not voting robert then you're defending robert.- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
great point, hadnt thought of thatIn post 430, PawnsGambit wrote:
This is a pretty stupid approach to mafia.In post 427, InsidiousLemons wrote:not asking you to have hard reads, asking you to back up the claims you've already made.
if you'd like to talk about robert as well, go ahead. i'm all ears
p-edit i am actually defending everyone im not voting. i think everyone is town except the person im currently voting, at all times- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
438 in a nutshell:
> pawns claims "immediate backlash" upon suggesting robert's entrance was scummy
> asked to post evidence of people defending robert
> the only example of "immediate backlash" included is savethedragons calling andante sus
> also includes green crayons voting for andante 2 pages later without saying anything about robert as a player
> also includes me pressuring robert, for some reason
???- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
what makes you say thatIn post 451, PawnsGambit wrote:You know there is likely 3 scum and not 5 right?- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
In post 449, Robert M Hunter wrote:
When I read this, my mind immediately jumped to the possibility ofIn post 362, Andante wrote:Serious question though, why is Osuka trying to control the game?Andante-scum being salty about osuka controlling the game. My scum read on this player slot remains unchanged.
your scumread of andante hinges on osuka being town, but for the second time you fail to provide any backup for why you actually believe the latter to be true. "being funny, generally" is NAI. admitting (jokingly or otherwise) to getting ATE'd and not doing any actual player analysis outside of that is questionable.In post 449, Robert M Hunter wrote: I am so entertained byosuka's posts that I would resist voting him even if he confessed.
this strikes me as rather flimsy reasoning. he doubles down, sure, but refuses to engage with questions directed at him or back up his reasoning with anything concrete. it reads to me like scum wanting to look confident but scared to overcommit.In post 449, Robert M Hunter wrote: Surprise, I'm (cautiously still) movingPawnout of the litter box into the kitten drawer. I see a whole lot of attention-grabbing terrible logic and cornered animal lashing out. His bad pushes get backlash but he doubles down like a townie instead of letting go like a good little scum.
struggling to decipher thisIn post 449, Robert M Hunter wrote:Salsabil Faria.I have formed an opinion on this player slot but it could be the kind of reason that will get me modkilled.
interesting, considering you never so much as mentioned his name in either post outside of the "kittens" list itself. the initial townread stems from 2 posts of VFP's: a random vote for osuka (one of the first posts in the thread) and a post asking if they were conftown yet. what evidence do you have which suggests to you that VFP is town?
touché. looks like most are 3-scum, a couple had 2 or 4 and none had 5. i still don't see readlist distribution not matching likely actual distribution as much of a problem this early thoughIn post 453, PawnsGambit wrote:Look at the number of scum in the last 10 mini normal 13 player games.- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
it's the complete avoidance of VFP's request for even one specific post that pings for me. the question "at what post did you feel osuka was scumhunting" is answered with yet another general statement, rather than just taking the time to find one of multiple posts of yours (313, 325) which exemplify the strategy he's talking about. it feels intentionally standoffish. you can see more of a similarly hostile/paranoid mentality in 425. so much nervous, agitated energy is present in the posts where he's being pressured and it feels driven by a desire to get people to talk about anyone but himself.In post 463, osuka wrote:
call me pocketed but isn't this a perfectly appropriate response for 413?In post 414, PawnsGambit wrote:I can tell Osuka is trying to sort people by conversing with a wide variety of players. This to me is genuine scum hunting.- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
glad to hear the interview went well! looking forward to reading tomorrow's postIn post 474, Andante wrote:whelp. interview went well!! its been a long day lmao had real life stuff to attend to, I'll try to get around to ISOs on all of yall tomorrow morning, there's like 3 more pages from when I was last here. rip- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
nope, i addressed your vote on me in 403. pawns' (continued) hostility and caginess about sharing his opinions/naming names is much more scummy to me than a possible diversion tactic early D1. would still like to know what you thought you were accomplishing, thoughIn post 507, Anya wrote:did insidious just ignore the fact he ever voted me or i voted him and go on to flay pawniard?
i agree with your point in 515 that an "i forgot" seems slightly more likely to come from town in this scenario than scum, but not by a lot. i don't think that alone would be enough for me to base a townread off of.- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
it is certainly the case that any given player is statistically more likely to be town than scum, but this is a terrible strategy for developing reads. by giving everyone who blends in a pass until they stand out, you allow scum to play the game exactly how they want to. this also still doesn't explain why your strongest scumread is on andante -- once again, your scumread of them depends upon osuka as town, a presumption for which you have offered precisely zero evidence.In post 459, Robert M Hunter wrote: Regarding osuka, I certainly have no reason to think they are scum at the moment, so they are a default town read. It's as simple as that. Like any default read, it is open to be revisited if I hear them squeak. In the meantime, I am enjoying their posts.
this is dumb as fuck lolIn post 533, Robert M Hunter wrote:
I will not argue against the wisdom of the legal system; it's "innocent until proven guilty" for good reasons.In post 486, osuka wrote:you default to townreading people? what the fuck???- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
okay, phew. took me several hours but i went through everyone's ISOs and have developed what i feel is a readlist that represents my gut feelings and reasoning well. i reordered these after writing them in slot-order, so forgive me if i reference minor points about other players before they appear in the list. in rough order, from most townest to most scummestest:
Osuka: the person infamously responsible for over 1/4 of all posts thus far. 184 and 185 are good. i like their response to VFP's analysis of their ISO in 312 and 313. their varied discussions with other players, generally speaking, feel like those of a player who is trying to determine alignment rather than looking to confirm what they already "suspect". see their early-game conversations with andres, discussion with STD from 323 onwards, etc. 461 bothers me a little bit, since without daytalk i don't really see how osuka actuallycouldcoach pawns like they're talking about.encrypting multishot mafia doc, anyone?i could almost see this as veiled anger at pawns -- "do you seriously think i'm that stupid?" could be read as an indirect dig at scumbuddy pawns. does anybody else pick up anything from this or am i getting too WIFOM? going to keep a close eye on this slot to prevent the potential for complacency, but despite minor gut pings, osuka is probably my strongest townread so far.
Andresvmb: the opening few posts have the energy to me of someone who, rather than being scum looking to pocket town!osuka, is leaving a rather heated and disappointing game and is hoping really hard that this one might be a bit less so. skimming through their last played game, particularly the end of day 4 when osuka was lynched, reveals this to be pretty much the case. i'm going to call their early "pocketing" attempts NAI. imo much of their early-game hostility can likely be attributed to this. i'm a little disquieted by the phrase "let [osuka] stay in the game", for similar reasons as why i disliked andante's reluctance to put pressure on the same player. the wording is not my fav, but it doesn't bother me enough to belabour it. the logic in 180 for their early townread of osuka is ok to me. 187 does bother me, because i don't like self-meta and i especially don't like i-suck-at-scum-here's-my-scumtells self-meta. i like 215 as well, apart from more self-meta. i think this was pointed out by osuka at the time as well. posts like 340 and 342 indicate to me an intent to keep pushing and questioning various players. they don't seem to be as unwilling to converse as Asteria would like to paint them to be. their recent posts have been marked by frustration at getting voted, but my gut tells me it's a genuine reaction to what does feel to me like a pretty stale push at this point. overall i'm okay with andres as town for now.
Save The Dragons: slight town read, but not a ton to go off. there is a confidence and an ease in his posts that makes me feel okay about him, though i imagine that confidence and ease is also sort of part and parcel with nearly 17 years on this site. 354 and 356 are good posts. so is 530. their push on pawns felt measured and, as with osuke, like it comes from the position of someone trying to gather information that is generally helpful to the town rather than specifically helpful to their case. i enjoy playing with people who answer questions directly and succinctly, so i may be somewhat biased. sue me.
Green Crayons: again, few posts to go on, but the ones that are there feel okay to me. this is one of my more gut-based reads but crayons leans very slightly town for me. still, much of their ISO reads as posting to post, such as the comment in 396. i would like if they posted more because they make decent observations in posts like 347. i get the sense that this player has more to contribute than they are offering up.
Anya: hard to say, but slight townlean. i don't hate anya's omgus vote on me as much as others seem to. i feel like scum finds a proper counterattack whereas that post (387) feels more like yawning townie confidence than scum backlash. i don't agree with the townread in 510 but the logic is honestly acceptable to me. much gut involved here but anya is actually looking a bit more town as the game goes on. i don't dislike her most recent posts.
Andante: upon rereading, 88 kinda pings weirdly for me. why is she so concerned about putting a 4th vote on osuka less than 100 posts into the game? "I kinda like them here" -- already? why? not like you're going to take them out that early anyway. i keep changing my mind on how her piss-poor reaction to robert's accusations reads, but i think i'm going to stick with my initial noobtown analysis until we see some more interaction between these players. 359 also sucks. 388, though, feels like genuine noobtown wordvomit from someone who is nervous and doesn't understand the game very well yet. i say this because it's painfully similar to how i played my first couple of town games here. the suggestion that scum might try to pocket one of their own buddies is a confusing one to me, but again (call me crazy), reads more like noobtown thinking out loud and smashing the submit button than scum floundering. there's no question they respond terribly to being pressured, though. i'm eager to see how they reenter this thread. slight gut townlean, but i'm not opposed to the idea that this slot could be filthy scum. still not the best D1 elim to me
Haschel Cedricson: only 10 posts to go on, which even of itself makes me a bit apprehensive. i'm always wary of people who have a desire to sit back and watch. something about asking osuka to "dial it down" in 222 also rubs me the wrong way, though while i disagree with their assessment of 180, i don't think their reasoning is particularly flawed. to this point the posts osuka had been making were pretty good imo. posting a lot is only bad if it's with an aim to steer the conversation away from certain topics, and osuka didn't seem to be doing that. moreover, if you're going to ask that someone leave room for others to speak, maybe start by filling that space with contributions of your own. as someone else mentioned, haschel's posts only really seem to contain idle questions and, occasionally, a weak followup. still null for now.
Salsabil Faria: no game-related posts since their blowup, which to me feels ever-so-slightly more likely to have come from town than scum. can't really put my finger on why, but i would kind of think scum makes an appeal to others about osuka's impoliteness here rather than going for the throat. until they come back from v/la, this slot stays null.
Asteria: very little of note until 395. i feel really off for some reason about their response to robert's entrance in that post -- i could see their lack of activity up to this point as scum feeling demoralized that their buddy let their role pm expire. i am likely reading too much into this but it does give me pause. defending robert in 552, which didn't concern asteria at all, after the person to whom the question was addressed had already responded pretty much the same thing, is bad. basing townreads off of shared readlists, based on the assumption that this at all indicates a shared "town mindset", is bad. asteria's only real activity so far has been a lacklustre readlist and endless pressing of the same early-game point on andres, which he's already responded to. whether they're satisfied with that response or not, there are more important things to be focusing energy on right now, and you don't have to push one player to the exclusion of talking about almost anything else. despite all this, i have to admit that on a gut level, their crusade against andres feels more like town tunnel vision than anything else. slight scumlean
Robert M Hunter: first read list in 276 was just... weird. robert later stands by this as a 100% honest post, which makes very little sense to me.
* osuka is too funny to be town
* haschel is scum for an rvs vote
* asteria is town for responding to a joke on page 2
* pawns is scum for [links to pawns' profile]
...the list goes on. it just doesn't make any sense, and all of the reads i directly called out as nonsensical before were never explained or backed up. 351 is a flimsy and unsolicited defense of VFP. as crayons mentions in 399, you can't choose who suspects you. the answer to "why latch onto osuka" is as simple as "osuka was the one pressing them". this is not a difficult leap of logic to make. the 449 readlist is better than the first, but it still presents quite a number of issues. i outline most of my problems with it in 455. the whole "talking about salsa could get me modkilled" still makes approximately zero sense to me. if you're not going to elaborate, why even say anything?
when? unless i'm missing something, your piss-poor page-12 readlist is the last time i saw you link or directly reference the number of another post to justify a read on anyone.In post 538, Robert M Hunter wrote:
I did provide post numbers in earlier posts, so no I am not allergic.In post 535, InsidiousLemons wrote:are you people allergic to providing specific post numbers? or even any general explanation of the kind of behaviour that makes you lean town on him?
VFP: 234 and 239 are terrible. if you truly have spent years on this site as you say in 245 then you have got to know why you don't post shit like "i'm going to coast until someone tells me who to vote for." i agree with whoever said (save the dragons, maybe?) that scum probably finds something to pin on osuka in 275, but a lack of ability to come up with something halfway convincing in that department is not particularly AI to me either. the bad sorting of posts that are not filler into filler categories is also indicative to me of shallow reading of osuka's ISO and quick post composition. on the whole 275 is not a good post. posts like 297, 302 aren't bad, but don't feel especially convincing to me. i actually don't hate 341, but their continued insistence that so many of osuka's worthwhile posts constitute filler does make me wonder whether they're just not bothering to read into them or if it's something more. scum just hoping people take their claims at face value? it's strange that after going after osuka for so long, in 408 they pivot to the assumption that osuka is town in order to further their push on pawns. VFP changing their mind after writing out their thoughts on osuka, or scum attacking whoever seems easy to target? this question is made thornier by the fact that it's giving me trouble to try and reconcile VFP and pawns as the same alignment, despite the fact that individually they're both looking fairly scummy to me right now.
PawnsGambit: i've mostly outlined my reasons for this scumread, but to sum up: most of this player's game has consisted of gadfly-ish questions with little of substance to follow them up, and either answering questions directed at them with questions of their own or else outright ignoring them. the flip from this:
to this:In post 425, PawnsGambit wrote:If you're voting me and not voting robert then you're defending robert.
--feels like an acknowledgement that their argument in 425 doesn't hold water. they're smarter than that, and they know it, so they don't attempt to back up what is transparently one of numerous failed attempts at changing the topic to robert. scum as a plumIn post 430, PawnsGambit wrote:
This is a pretty stupid approach to mafia.In post 427, InsidiousLemons wrote:i am actually defending everyone im not voting. i think everyone is town except the person im currently voting, at all times
also:
@VFP, you never elaborated on this:
what makes you say so?In post 382, VFP wrote: Anya strikes me as an easy player to read as the day goes on.- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
this game is going to make me lose my mind. the longer i stare at this post the more i begin to think it's one of the most telling things andante has posted this whole game. what actual reason does town have to post this?In post 621, Andante wrote:In post 620, Anya wrote:woah are you trying to get killed night 1 insidious
We can just ask the mafia doctor to save insidious!!! duh! lmao (but for real, maf, we value insidious, and it would be greatly appreciated if you kept him around! Thank you)- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
hey, if i'm fish food tonight at least you'll know i wasn't far off the mark.In post 620, Anya wrote:woah are you trying to get killed night 1 insidious- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
i was talking about the bit in parentheses -- it's clearly meant to be taken more seriously than the rest of the post ("but for real"). talking to Mafia, Generally, Wherever You May Be in this way pings like noobscum. town has no reason to ask scum not to kill someone they like, it's just one more reason for scum to kill themIn post 645, Asteria wrote:
Also what reason does mafia have to post this thoughIn post 639, InsidiousLemons wrote:
this game is going to make me lose my mind. the longer i stare at this post the more i begin to think it's one of the most telling things andante has posted this whole game. what actual reason does town have to post this?In post 621, Andante wrote:In post 620, Anya wrote:woah are you trying to get killed night 1 insidious
We can just ask the mafia doctor to save insidious!!! duh! lmao (but for real, maf, we value insidious, and it would be greatly appreciated if you kept him around! Thank you)
if you were joking the whole time then why separate the post into two parts? why say "but for real?"In post 646, Andante wrote:In post 639, InsidiousLemons wrote:
this game is going to make me lose my mind. the longer i stare at this post the more i begin to think it's one of the most telling things andante has posted this whole game. what actual reason does town have to post this?In post 621, Andante wrote:In post 620, Anya wrote:woah are you trying to get killed night 1 insidious
We can just ask the mafia doctor to save insidious!!! duh! lmao (but for real, maf, we value insidious, and it would be greatly appreciated if you kept him around! Thank you)
you don't like my lines? wooow I was just joking with Anya? Are you trying to say I can't have a little fun? that's suspicious... that's weird...
not remembering what you told us <24 hours ago --> low familiarity with your own (fabricated?) opinions --> scumtellIn post 647, Andante wrote:so I have determined. there's not a scum read I'm super confident in at this point in time.
Also, I love the game advancing content rule, it annoys me when people just go "hi I'm here" and that counts
I think it was crayons or dragon I was feeling was weird, idk. I don't even remember what I told yall last night, should probably start there I know I said Asteria felt off, ahhhh if someone has a confident sr, please out it
"please talk loudly about your scumreads so i can wagon them" --> scumtell
this whole paragraph is almost purely iioa. also strange to me that you only back up your null reads and don't mention your, you know, actual reads. if you only saw "maybe 1" vfp post, you need to go back and read the goddamn game. null because i don't care enough to read their posts isn't a read. you've complained about ISOing as if it's something you're never actually going to do, and moaned and grumbled about going back to find a specific post to back up your arguments early in the game. you shouldn't be upset by people asking you to do this, it is literally how to play forum mafia. you can't win without ever looking at ISO, without ever going back and rereading.In post 649, Andante wrote:Andante – Town
Anya - Town
Andresvmb - Town
InsidiousLemons - Town
Save The Dragons - Sus
Green Crayons - Town
Asteria – Sus
PawnsGambit – leaning town
VFP –
Haschel Cedricson –
Salsabil Faria –
Osuka –
Robert M Hunter -
Ok, I collected my thoughts from yesterday for yall, and I realized, I haven't outed a read on osuka, then that had me thinking, how do I read osuka? they certainly have lots of content here, always posting. I skimmed through some lines of theirs, and at this time, I honestly don't know how I read them, like, I could see a town and a scum argument, so for them, I'll wait till later to sort. Haschel said he was posting after work, never did, but I was the same with yesterday morning, so, I'd love to see more content there. VFP? idk. I think I saw maybe 1 VFP post, they've just been flying under the radar tbh. Salsa. if I'm being completely honest, I'd probably call scum, solely based on their anger reaction to osuka. They got mad, and left, but, 3they've been v/la or whatever so I'd love to hear actual content from them, cause their lines before leaving were far from great. And lastly, Robert. I really don't know. like, robert will jump in with weird lines, their entrance to the game was also far from great, but like, I could see them coming from a town mindset. yeah. that's where my brain is at
for someone so concerned about not letting people have fun, you're pretty pressed about this second-page post. i guess i could have made it more obviously joking in tone, but andres would have to be actually braindead to claim in response to this post. we were in rvs. chillIn post 650, Andante wrote:In post 30, InsidiousLemons wrote:@andres what is your claim? night 0 cop?
Lemons, I could do the same right back at you, what reason does town have to post this? What if Andres took it as you were actually asking them to claim? no reason for town to care about claims 30 posts into the game
i'm content with this for now given gc's backup and the fact that i haven't been on the site in a few years.In post 652, osuka wrote:i don’t think that was the case a number of years ago but i do distinctly recall a point where it felt like i woke up and suddenly daytalk just seemed to be the norm
post of the game
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
In post 701, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:YES I ROLLED SCUM MWAHAHAHAHAH PREPARE TO DIE- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
can you post something other than flavourtext please and thanksIn post 725, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Insidious will you be my Saruman?
Betray your allies.
Join the Darkness.- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
and this is supposed to make me scum?In post 742, Andante wrote:everything he says is like a matter of fact... no emotion...- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
i've literally been townreading you on gut this entire game. i have given you the benefit of the doubt at every turn. i think i'd tr you if you gave me a reason to believe you want us to win this gameIn post 734, Andante wrote:In post 726, InsidiousLemons wrote:my gut may be actually broken because despite everything it still wants andante to be noobtown. i don't care. if we are going to win this thing you need to actually play the game in a way that benefits town.
VOTE: Andante
I think you'd tr me if you stopped looking at me through a conf scum pov.. just saying- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
In post 747, Andante wrote:Like, do people want me to claim? cause we're not voting me out, I'm important. I'm the doctor the red oneIn post 748, Anya wrote:no no don'tIn post 749, Andante wrote:haha I won't actually claim!!! dw. I'll get voted out before I do claimIn post 751, Anya wrote:just don't say anything else about your role
give it time people will realise you're town if you are (which i think you are right now) wagons don't last foreverIn post 754, Andante wrote:cause if I'm voted out, yall clearly don't want me. whelp. I want the votes off me when I'm back, thanks. if they're not, idk, I'm down for a salsa or lemons elim tbh, wait whoever I was voting last night is also a good one, they also had bad lines- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
i can tell that you do not have very much experience with or knowledge of (at least the forum version of) this game. i don't mean this as an insult, but it is blatantly true. experienced players are not so easily overcome by emotions. experienced players do not call me conftown, then decide they'd be fine with me being the elim a couple pages later because i put some pressure on them. experienced players do not complain about other people using too much logic and too little emotion. the list goes on.In post 764, Andante wrote:
mhm... cause that reason has been "oh andante noob!!! noob town!!" I've had some great lines, which apparently you didn't care for. I don't care. I'm taking a breakIn post 757, InsidiousLemons wrote:
i've literally been townreading you on gut this entire game. i have given you the benefit of the doubt at every turn. i think i'd tr you if you gave me a reason to believe you want us to win this gameIn post 734, Andante wrote:In post 726, InsidiousLemons wrote:my gut may be actually broken because despite everything it still wants andante to be noobtown. i don't care. if we are going to win this thing you need to actually play the game in a way that benefits town.
VOTE: Andante
I think you'd tr me if you stopped looking at me through a conf scum pov.. just saying
i am torn between these reactions being the result of town frustrated that no one else can tell they're town (sort of what greencrayons was talking about in the "thinking the thread revolves around them could be town ai" post), or the result of scum frustrated that they aren't having much of an effect on the game and scared that they're going to eat rope. in either case, the way you are currently playing is not conducive to helping town win this game.
if you'd like to link me to specific lines of yours that you think were "great", i'm happy to read through them. who knows, maybe i'm sleeping on some real insight.
if you're town, you need to take a step back, stop taking criticism of your posts as personal attacks, and really dial in and try to read through this game objectively to develop some proper, fleshed-out reads.
if you're scum, well... eat rope.- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
can you expand on this? how do you think your reaction to pressure differs as scum?In post 801, Andante wrote:I hate pressure, I break under it too, take it more as a joke as scum- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
In post 806, Andante wrote:In post 804, InsidiousLemons wrote:
can you expand on this? how do you think your reaction to pressure differs as scum?In post 801, Andante wrote:I hate pressure, I break under it too, take it more as a joke as scum
uhhh not really, too hard to explain, I'm gonna go play in the snow (we have a snow storm right now) and when I'm back I'm ISOing Haschel, and if he's been here for 5 days with no content, I'm voting him, would rather keep people who try.In post 803, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I always have the time of my life
VOTE: Lemons
we kill Gandalf today
join me forces of evilIn post 775, InsidiousLemons wrote:@mod why are there so many jesters in this setup- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
this andante is very unsure of any reads at all.In post 647, Andante wrote:so I have determined. there's not a scum read I'm super confident in at this point in time.
[...]
I think it was crayons or dragon I was feeling was weird, idk. I don't even remember what I told yall last night, should probably start there
then they "collect their thoughts" and decide dragons is sus, without providing any reasoning. when prompted, they have this to say:In post 649, Andante wrote: Save The Dragons - Sus
to be fair, pawns wasn't giving dragons much to go off of. the conversation, of which here you provide only one side, feels more to me like save the dragons attempting to have the type of conversation you're talking about and getting very little in return. don't get me wrong, certainly not the most insightful posts in std's iso, but i don't find anything here that really merits a scumread on its own.In post 664, Andante wrote:@Dragon, I'll elaborate on you,
It's lines like these, they have no content to them... your cat thing feels so weird, and like "you're putting more effort crucifying robert than pushing your vote" for context this came immediately after you voted me. None of your lines feel like you're trying to find scum.In post 540, Save The Dragons wrote:do you just hate cats?
These VFP lines, you're implying VFP is your TR, and you don't understand why someone SRs them. Why not give why you think VFP is town? engage in a conversation about it, give the side you see, compare notes, etc. Like, reading your ISO, most lines are just responding to osuka, or lines like this, that seem to be going in no direction. You throw out questions like this, never return to them to follow up!!! It literally feels like maf to me, reading more into you here, I'd move you from sus to scum tbh. Town that's trying to find scum would ask relevant questions, then return to them, if you out a tr/sr, doesn't it make sense to talk to someone who's outing an opposite read from you?? idk, it feels like you're trying to go no where with all your posts.In post 542, Save The Dragons wrote:you're putting more effort crucifying robert than pushing your vote
so i'm wondering if you're just allergic to cats or something i dunno
In post 543, Save The Dragons wrote:why exactly did you think VFP was scummy again?In post 546, Save The Dragons wrote:do you have anything else on VFP?
they continue:
this is the post in question:In post 664, Andante wrote: looking at #354 (idk if this link works.... testing..)
looking at #354, osuka is like "what's your thought on this" and you pretty much go "idk, I tr you" like, changing the topic, your lines feel really weird to me, and I'm not entirely sure why you feel so off...
there are 2 parts to this post -- "here's why i haven't given it much thought yet" and "here's the take itself". andante mischaracterizes this post as consisting solely of the answer to the first question ("because i'm reading osuke as town"), and ignores the meat of std's response. this post isn't changing the topic, it's responding directly to the question. of all the posts you could have quoted, why choose one where std actually brings up some pretty okay points? did you even read the whole post?In post 354, Save The Dragons wrote:
I honestly haven't given it too much thought because i'm reading you as town.In post 325, osuka wrote:what's your take on vfp's push?
I don't quite buy that being toxic makes you scum, but i have seen scum use toxicity to their ends, so i'm not sure if i agree but i don't mind the headspace they're in. 275 is a little weird because all they seem to do is say you post NAI and positive things in their PBPA. I feel like scum in that situation finds something to pin on you instead of just kind of throwing their hands up. I mean they repeat the point about toxicity being scummy but...eh?
plus i use my gut a lot and it's pinging for some people and not really for VFP at the moment.
sidenote: funny enough, andante actually linked to the 354th post in the site's history, not the 354th post in this thread. i'm not sure, but i think the # is what broke it. to actually link a post from this thread by number, do this:
Code: Select all
[post]354[/post]
anyway.
taken all together, this sequence of andante's read developing on dragons looks more like them fixating on the idea of dragons being scum and cherry-picking posts that they feel support that idea (though again, the examples cited don't even really feel to me like they do that) rather than a genuine attempt to determine alignment.
what gives me pause, though, is the fact that despite all this tunneling, andante. why do all that work if they aren't even going to push? it makes me feel like all this really could just be sloppy play blinded by emotions and genuine logical fallacy. this is what's driving me so insane. a townie who can't help but play like this is almost as useless as actual scum, but there's a small part of me that can't help feeling like there could be a player with pro-town motivations and the ability to work towards that objective lurking underneath all this (sorry) lazy and terrible play. andante,has never even voted for save the dragons. and if you keep avoiding it, you're only going to make me doubt that small part of me even more than i already do.this is why i keep pressuring you
my question, then, is this: is thereanythingin the ~150 posts between 664 and 821 that has made you genuinely suspicious of dragons?what is it that makes you "pretty certain" dragons is scum?- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
one last point, reading back -- is this a scum slip? "i'll get voted out before i claim" implies andante wouldn't claim until they are actually eliminated. is there ever town motivation for withholding a claim until the hammer is dropped? on second reading this could almost feel like reassurance to a scumpartner, but i don't feel comfortable calling anya scum yet. still, this association is definitely worth revisiting if one of them flips.In post 749, Andante wrote:haha I won't actually claim!!! dw. I'll get voted out before I do claim- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
what do you mean? i am trying to give them as much leeway as possible in the first post because i've been guilty in the past of the assumption that bad play necessarily = scum. however, i don't really think you have to give them much credit at all to see 749 as a scumslip. it might be a stretch, but it's a stretch based on them being exceptionally careless rather than exceptionally clever.In post 826, osuka wrote:
i think you're giving the slot way too much creditIn post 824, InsidiousLemons wrote:
one last point, reading back -- is this a scum slip? "i'll get voted out before i claim" implies andante wouldn't claim until they are actually eliminated. is there ever town motivation for withholding a claim until the hammer is dropped? on second reading this could almost feel like reassurance to a scumpartner, but i don't feel comfortable calling anya scum yet. still, this association is definitely worth revisiting if one of them flips.In post 749, Andante wrote:haha I won't actually claim!!! dw. I'll get voted out before I do claim- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
agreed. and there are reasons to read andante as plausibly town, but the posts he cites aren't examples of the ones i seeIn post 832, VFP wrote:Robert's vote just looks like distancing to me.- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
-
InsidiousLemons Mafia Scum
- InsidiousLemons
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: January 29, 2014
- Location: Canada
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons
- InsidiousLemons