Consider this vote your initiation to the site
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
I think you'll just have to accept that people don't usually read sign up threads after inning.In post 55, Wayward Son wrote:In the queue I made it clear that I wasn't "a brand newbie", and was reading games. I urge everyone to give it a look.In post 37, T3 wrote:Bulge, what particularly stuck out to you about that? What stuck out to me was mostly that it was a brand newbie supposedly having read a bunch of games. This reads to me as if almost fake helpful and as if it was fed by a scumpartner.
Of all my accusers, this looks the worst.
VOTE: t3
Which he, sorry?In post 91, Wayward Son wrote:I did read an Open where he was scum. In that game he kept his posts fairly short and won.
Yeah, sorry for not really engaging yet but I'll try to dig in some more later.In post 70, Lukewarm wrote:I am a bit wary that you appear to have discounted so many of the people that have not posted very much yet tho. Like, Egix, The Bulge, and [the Opposite slot] are all still sitting in null for me.
Oh right, I thought you might have meant me.In post 96, Wayward Son wrote:T3. But the game I looked at he actually lost.In post 95, Egix96 wrote:Which he, sorry?![]()
Open 808.
T3 - I have bad vibes from 37 and I don't really buy his explanation that it was a joke.In post 105, Roden wrote:This especially just weirds me out. Why make this post during RVS but then not actually vote? It feels low key manipulative and helped jump start the current Wayward wagon.
I mean, with the site meya we have here, it kinda has to happen or else nothing will happen.In post 126, Roden wrote:There were two very fast wagons and some serious accusations thrown around very early into Day 1. It's just surprising seeing people push hard on their votes so early into the game.
While reading the five people after you in alphabetical order I must have forgotten you had said thatIn post 145, Roden wrote:Also, interesting to know about the vote but idk how that checks out. The post you voted T3 with explicitly says you spent a couple hours reading posts, and my only major post at the time mentioned that he was at E-2 and that anyone putting him at E-1 should be looked at. The part of my post you quoted and said you liked states this in the very next line. I'm not trying to fish for a "gotcha" moment here but I just find it hard to believe that you wouldn't have known.
What I think is that scum simply saw 209 and ran with it. It's actually a smart move because not only does it cast doubt on me, but it's also hard for me to trace it to any specific person.In post 273, Zyla wrote:Anyway, I don't think I've read said much about my reads yet, so
Currently, Luke is my main TR, Bulge seems to be leaning in that direction, but honestly hasn't posted that much yet, so mostly null.
I've been liking Egix for town, but I do want to see what he says about having something to gain from the NK.
Mix has been hard for me to read, so honestly I'm null on them
Wayward and Xlos are both pretty high on my suspect list, but I want to see what Mix and Bulge think of the night happenings before I commit to a vote.
I'm doubtful that Zyla is scum tbh. I'll try to dig in some more later today, but being hasty here is the worst thing to do.In post 286, Lukewarm wrote:If we end up in consensus that the scum is likely between Egix or Zyla, then we can just kill them bothIn post 282, Xlos wrote:The case for Zyla is pretty compelling, but I still think that Egix is more likely.![]()
![]()
![]()
We get to kill 3 more people total before we lose
I know it's not much, but this was the recent snippet I was feeling town from.In post 267, Zyla wrote:Also, the Mason team was assumed to be Mix-Los, and xlos has claimed he's not a mason,In post 263, Wayward Son wrote:If all this Mason talk is correct, then we're facing a Goon or a Roleblocker. The role blocker is useless against Masons, so this might be real good!so unfortunately I think that Rolecop is back in the game, and that's useful in any line-up
Are you willing to go into more detail on this? I'm asking because I don't think I'll be able to form an actual read on Bulge that isn't just PoE, otherwise.In post 224, Lukewarm wrote:I have the bulge as pretty hard town tbh
At start of day, this post was my main reason for having Wayward as town.In post 55, Wayward Son wrote:In the queue I made it clear that I wasn't "a brand newbie", and was reading games. I urge everyone to give it a look.In post 37, T3 wrote:Bulge, what particularly stuck out to you about that? What stuck out to me was mostly that it was a brand newbie supposedly having read a bunch of games. This reads to me as if almost fake helpful and as if it was fed by a scumpartner.
Of all my accusers, this looks the worst.
VOTE: t3
I'm thinking, if Mix had both scum in this section, wouldn't they be a top priority for the NK? It's what's giving me doubt about flipping my read on Wayward, and also makes me less certain about Xlos.In post 68, MixLixWix wrote:Zyla, T3, Wayward, Xlos* (* pending response) are my suspects right now.
I don't think you quite understand.In post 304, Lukewarm wrote:Scum saved you from that by killing Roden.In post 298, Egix96 wrote:I was more expecting that people would pile on me first, with scum simply having to sit back and watch as I was falsely incriminated, rather than them having to take the initiative themself.
(And that does include you possibly having saved yourself)
Because there was a scum flip, I re-read during the night phase, but focused on interactions with T3 more than on posts that may read as towny on their own but don't mention T3.In post 325, Wayward Son wrote:Could you explain this progression, please?
I don't usually post a lot, no. Tbf, I probably would have had more if D1 hadn't ended earlier than I expected.In post 346, Zyla wrote:As far as egix, like I just said, my read is pretty null on them, considering how little they seem to post. Honestly though, with the fact that they've actually posted less than the gm, it's starting to feel more anti-town than just null. I'm tempted to look into his meta and see if that's normal for him as town, and tbh I usually dislike using meta (although it was helpful in T3's case)
How exactly, though? Not meaning to be patronising or anything, I'm just finding it hard to process this argument.In post 323, Wayward Son wrote:But to OMGUS vote a partner right off the bat and never let up would be some "nerves of steel" play with not a particularly high chance of success.
Hmmm, I'm feeling like the parts I've highlighted here could be pretty important.In post 172, Roden wrote:I believe Zyla is town. Scum wouldn't make those posts, not even newbscum, and as I said earlier I think she's experienced with this game.
Her and Egix were my two PoE for T3's partner but now it really only leaves Egix. Even if T3 somehow flips town I still don't think Egix looks good.
I believe T3 wants to be hammered ASAP at this point so there's less information to dissect Day 2. His theoretical partner has very little suspicion on them and an ongoing Day 1 threatens that. That's why I refrained from hammering, and potentially why Egix put T3 at hammer range. Maybe to tempt someone to hammer a player who looks like obvscum.
There is another potential but unlikely T3 partner. Does anyone think Wayward vs T3 could've just been scum vs scum?
Like, yeah... based on this, it's unreasonable that you didn't understand.In post 155, Xlos wrote:It's a joke, I'm basically claiming to be a townie because the premise is false. (Unless I'm selling out my teammate lol)
I'm was imagining the situation where T3 is town. But thinking about it more, the mafia killing lukewarm in the night might not make sense - I imagining they would do that since he's the most town-read so far, but this is less obviously true the next day if t3 flips town. So ignore the second part of the sentence. The point is that I think controversy is better to analyze than global agreement. It's not about me wanting or not wanting T3 to be lynched.In post 135, Lukewarm wrote:IIn post 134, The Bulge wrote:are you assuming that t3 is mafia and lukewarm is town here? if so then why would you not want t3 to be today's elimination?In post 130, Xlos wrote:I'd rather have another candidate so we can get more controversial choice, otherwise mafia will just kill lukewarm the next day and we haven't learned anything.thinkhe is saying that T3 is scum and I am town, but wants all to keep talking and trying to find a counter wagon so that the mafia will have a harder choice with their night kill? Honestly, the whole post from Xlos makes my head hurt
No, I haven't been purposefully suspicious, I just got the feeling that some of my posts felt suspicious afterword's, since most of what I was doing was trying to make arguments on people from basically 0 evidence (day 1 is hard). Writing my posts gives me a headache too in a way; I read into things a lot... it's only going to get worse,In post 136, Lukewarm wrote:I think you have had like 4 total posts before this. And I have looked at them with a bit of suspicion, which is why I had you the category ofIn post 130, Xlos wrote:I think I've been posting fairly suspiciously but I haven't had that much suspicion fall on me yet
Are you saying that you have been purposefully suspicious in order to gauge how town reacted to you? wtf?In post 66, Lukewarm wrote:"I need to hear more from you so I can tell if your posts sound off because you are scum or just because you are new"
Your whole post just now gives me a headache.last game I played I had these 5-step if-then statements in every post and half the time I just had a logic error in my argument cause there was too much to keep track of.Well, hopefully I'll do better this game.
I'm not named Luke, but Lukewarm is a word with some meaning, and Luke does not have the same meaning at all. It's kind of like shortening a compound word, but is Lukewarm really a compound word? Meanwhile both MixLixWix and Mix mean nothing, and all 3 parts of the compound word are almost the same.In post 138, Lukewarm wrote:How are you gonna be confused by people shortening Lukewarm -> Luke, but also feel comfortable shortening MixLixWix-> Mix lmaoIn post 130, Xlos wrote:Lukewarm (I get confused when people shorten it to Luke)
...
Mix hasn't talked too much since the start of the day
Spoiler:
Forgot to do this yesterday UNVOTE: .
It's like this:In post 379, Wayward Son wrote:@ egix Sometimes when I drink, I have a hard time sleeping (like now).In post 357, Egix96 wrote:@Lukewarm
Oops yeah. I was reading through the pages in order, so although I was aware that Roden had been townreading Wayward, I had forgotten that they had explained that one line on the next page.
I brought it up because I thought it was a "better kill this person in case they change their mind" sort of thing.
Please explain the last paragraph to me. Maybe tomorrow I'll feel dumb.
It was something he made up on the spot for certain, because T3 posted multiple times between me voting him, and him saying that it "felt opportunistic and scmmy."In post 387, Pavowski wrote:This could be WIFOM
What I mean is that, if T3 had really "thought" it, he would have mentioned it much sooner.In post 428, Pavowski wrote:"For certain"? Can you be sure of that?
I'm vanilla town.In post 441, Lukewarm wrote:I guess you should go ahead and claim Egix.
You can treat this as myintent to hammer
Not so much a claim, but rather her final thoughts.In post 468, Xlos wrote:Actually should we wait for a Zyla claim?
So it was you?In post 479, Zyla wrote:I'm glad I was able to spreadPavowski wrote:As much as I am not confident in this vote, I am even less confident the votes are there to eliminate Egix tonight. Let's hope this is the game.somedoubt at least
Anyway, I can't say I'msurprised, even if I am slightly disappointed I don't make it another day.
GG all and congrats on a game well played
Well played. I thought you were really pure tonally.In post 482, Zyla wrote:Honestly, that's totally me, so I guess we'll have to wait for the big guy to say