Newbie 2065 | The Backrooms | Endgame
Forum rules
- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
I'll start off by saying this is such a weird take. Zyla's vote was during RVS, why shouldn't it be random? If anything, trying to give a legitimate reason for votes during RVS feels a bit scummy.In post 50, Xlos wrote:
Random is a lame reason to vote for someone IMO. It doesn't really encourage any discussion or have inspire any fear of being lynched. Even the first post of the thread had a reason to vote for someone! So that's my reason to VOTE: ZylaIn post 33, Zyla wrote:I'll be honest, I wasn't even thinking about the fact that I was responding to the person I was voting, I just used a random picker and got Wayward's name
Though I'll admit I don't have a read on Zyla yet. I kinda get the feeling they're an experienced newbie, since their posts feel a little controlled/revised and they're mentioning some outside experience. I'll say they're townleaning for now because of a hunch.
Next, I'm seeing alotof pressure on Wayward for very little reason. I thought at first people were just testing for reactions, but it feels like way too many people are looking too deeply into a couple fluffy posts of theirs. They of course could still be scum but it feels more likely actual scum are putting early pressure on them. Maybe to make them dig their own grave? The more they talk the worse it does look for them, but nothing they're posting reads as particularly scummy.
T3's giving me weird vibes. Only five posts so far (at the time of writing this), the first few posts had literally no content, and anything with content just reads as...well, not scummish but definitely not town.
This especially just weirds me out. Why make this post during RVS but then not actually vote? It feels low key manipulative and helped jump start the current Wayward wagon. Though him reaching E-2 so quickly also kind of worries me. If anyone puts him at E-1, they need to get looked at.In post 20, T3 wrote:What if the scumteam is just wayward and egix and we don't even have to think about anything at all this game. That would be fun
Lukewarm reads as helpful, but I wouldn't say he's done anything to deserve a town read tbh. Anybody can analyze RVS phase posts and look good, there's literally zero danger to it. But at the same time, he's not really setting off any scum vibes. We've seen a lot from him but I feel like I need more that isn't just him analyzing everyone's RVS posts.
Mix gives me similar vibes. Though I'm noticing they also both seemed to buddy up almost immediately. Have you two played together before?
The Bulge reads pretty heavily town. I mainly just like his posting patterns, and him zeroing in on Wayward, even though I disagree with the suspicion itself, reads as genuine. He's putting pressure but letting others react instead of building a case himself.
Absolutely no read on Egix yet, he hasn't posted much or given anyone anything to work with yet. I'd like to see some opinions from him on the current votes and ask if he has any reads.- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
That's understandable! But that's also exactly why I didn't like it. You made a "push" that you could say was just a joke if anyone pressured you about it.In post 108, T3 wrote:
This was a terrible joke I had made under 4 hours of sleep and then 4 hours of zoom class in my break.In post 20, T3 wrote:What if the scumteam is just wayward and egix and we don't even have to think about anything at all this game. That would be fun
This is either a lazy hero solve or a reactionary one. Either way it's teetering on OMGUS. Which townreads a little bit better.In post 109, Lukewarm wrote:Hero solve [T3 + Roden]
There were two very fast wagons and some serious accusations thrown around very early into Day 1. It's just surprising seeing people push hard on their votes so early into the game.In post 114, The Bulge wrote:
what does this mean?In post 101, Roden wrote:Though looking at the vote count it looks like some people already have some spicy takes early into the game.
I was mainly giving reads because I was coming in late on a slot that said literally nothing and you guys kinda needed something to work with. I don't think it's particularly suspicious of me to not comment on it considering I had my own unique worries with T3.In post 116, Lukewarm wrote:Roden, did you have any thoughts about my Meta case against T3?Spoiler:
OR about The Buldge's contribution
OR about T3's "rebuttal" to the meta case?In post 81, The Bulge wrote:If you'd like some legal meta, I just modded a large normal where scumT3 laid down some incredibly bizarre distancing tactics D1 before being eliminated that ultimately factored into his team's win. giving me similar vibes here.
I find it strange that you read this thread, and did not have a single thought about it (agree or disagree) given how many people have chimed into this conversation. And you instead hand waved that all as "Just analyzing RVS votes"In post 46, T3 wrote:I think that's fair, but you should also note that the Demainer vote was a bus. So your theory only works if I'm scum with Wayward.
I don't really disagree with the meta sus and I think T3's defense is pretty awful. But a few days ago I also fully read the game the two of you were in (completely by chance btw, I just chose a recently finished newbie game so I could see how they play out), and T3 got scum read hard there but turned out to be town. You also ended up aligning yourself with both scum, and scum read the most obvious town player in the game.
Point being, idk how much credit to give your meta sus. I'd rather trust my own scum read of T3.- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
Wild that I literally just said anyone who puts T3 at hammer range so soon deserves to be looked at, and Egix immediately does exactly that.In post 118, Lukewarm wrote:Just so everyone knows, that puts T3 at e-1
So be aware, that if anyone else votes him here, it would be a hammer.
LMAOIn post 122, Lukewarm wrote:
UhhhhhhhIn post 121, T3 wrote:In post 105, Roden wrote:
I'll start off by saying this is such a weird take. Zyla's vote was during RVS, why shouldn't it be random? If anything, trying to give a legitimate reason for votes during RVS feels a bit scummy.In post 50, Xlos wrote:
Random is a lame reason to vote for someone IMO. It doesn't really encourage any discussion or have inspire any fear of being lynched. Even the first post of the thread had a reason to vote for someone! So that's my reason to VOTE: ZylaIn post 33, Zyla wrote:I'll be honest, I wasn't even thinking about the fact that I was responding to the person I was voting, I just used a random picker and got Wayward's name
Though I'll admit I don't have a read on Zyla yet. I kinda get the feeling they're an experienced newbie, since their posts feel a little controlled/revised and they're mentioning some outside experience. I'll say they're townleaning for now because of a hunch.
Next, I'm seeing alotof pressure on Wayward for very little reason. I thought at first people were just testing for reactions, but it feels like way too many people are looking too deeply into a couple fluffy posts of theirs. They of course could still be scum but it feels more likely actual scum are putting early pressure on them. Maybe to make them dig their own grave? The more they talk the worse it does look for them, but nothing they're posting reads as particularly scummy.
T3's giving me weird vibes. Only five posts so far (at the time of writing this), the first few posts had literally no content, and anything with content just reads as...well, not scummish but definitely not town.
This especially just weirds me out. Why make this post during RVS but then not actually vote? It feels low key manipulative and helped jump start the current Wayward wagon. Though him reaching E-2 so quickly also kind of worries me. If anyone puts him at E-1, they need to get looked at.In post 20, T3 wrote:What if the scumteam is just wayward and egix and we don't even have to think about anything at all this game. That would be fun
Lukewarm reads as helpful, but I wouldn't say he's done anything to deserve a town read tbh. Anybody can analyze RVS phase posts and look good, there's literally zero danger to it. But at the same time, he's not really setting off any scum vibes. We've seen a lot from him but I feel like I need more that isn't just him analyzing everyone's RVS posts.
Mix gives me similar vibes. Though I'm noticing they also both seemed to buddy up almost immediately. Have you two played together before?
The Bulge reads pretty heavily town. I mainly just like his posting patterns, and him zeroing in on Wayward, even though I disagree with the suspicion itself, reads as genuine. He's putting pressure but letting others react instead of building a case himself.
Absolutely no read on Egix yet, he hasn't posted much or given anyone anything to work with yet. I'd like to see some opinions from him on the current votes and ask if he has any reads.I don't like this post. Lean scum.
T3 do you actuallywantto be hammered here?
Because I didn't want to put T3 at hammer range so soon into Day 1. I voted Luke because he had zero pressure on him and I wanted to see how he'd react. Also wanted to see if anyone would jump on it or come to his defense. I got exactly what I wanted and feel like I can town read him a bit more comfortably now.In post 124, Wayward Son wrote:
To me, it looks like you scum read Xlos the most, but ended up voting someone who "isn't giving off scum vibes"? Why Luke over someone (T3) who's giving off weird vibes?In post 105, Roden wrote:Lukewarm reads as helpful, but I wouldn't say he's done anything to deserve a town read tbh. Anybody can analyze RVS phase posts and look good, there's literally zero danger to it.But at the same time, he's not really setting off any scum vibes.We've seen a lot from him but I feel like I need more that isn't just him analyzing everyone's RVS posts.
Personally, Bulge, Mix, and Luke are my strongest TRs.
Egix is a gut TR.- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
Ah, ok that makes a lot more sense actually. I also like your analysis post. I think you're hinting at something...which makes me want to rethink my hunch on Zyla, depending on what happens Day 2.In post 131, Xlos wrote:
Well proving that a vote random is a good way to alleviate any consequences of that vote having happened, I believe there is a rule in the forum saying that you can't prove things are random for that explicit reason. To be a bit pedantic, RVS should be Arbitrary Voting Stage instead.In post 105, Roden wrote:
I'll start off by saying this is such a weird take. Zyla's vote was during RVS, why shouldn't it be random? If anything, trying to give a legitimate reason for votes during RVS feels a bit scummy.In post 50, Xlos wrote:
Random is a lame reason to vote for someone IMO. It doesn't really encourage any discussion or have inspire any fear of being lynched. Even the first post of the thread had a reason to vote for someone! So that's my reason to VOTE: ZylaIn post 33, Zyla wrote:I'll be honest, I wasn't even thinking about the fact that I was responding to the person I was voting, I just used a random picker and got Wayward's name
I agree but especially with the bolded. His posts have been all over the place and I had no idea what he was doing for the longest time, since he seems so obvscum and isn't doing much to actually defend himself. I thought maybe he was just resigned to being voted out, but Bulge's meta sus about T3's weird distance strats rang some warning bells.In post 129, Lukewarm wrote:
To be fair, my scum read on you is mild, but it has nothing to do with the vote on me, and everything to do with not liking post 105.In post 126, Roden wrote:
This is either a lazy hero solve or a reactionary one. Either way it's teetering on OMGUS. Which townreads a little bit better.In post 109, Lukewarm wrote:Hero solve [T3 + Roden]
This is fair. Although, this was, I believe my first game with T3, and we have been in like 5 games together since then. I think I am getting a better feel for him. T3 often gets scum because of the normal way he posts as town. If anything, 37 stood out for not being a lim-bait postIn post 126, Roden wrote: I don't really disagree with the meta sus and I think T3's defense is pretty awful. But a few days ago I also fully read the game the two of you were in (completely by chance btw, I just chose a recently finished newbie game so I could see how they play out), and T3 got scum read hard there but turned out to be town. You also ended up aligning yourself with both scum, and scum read the most obvious town player in the game.
Point being, idk how much credit to give your meta sus. I'd rather trust my own scum read of T3.
At this point, I am fairly confident on the T3 scum read. Post 20 piqued my interest, then the meta stuff about 37 made it enough for me to bring up and pressure him for, but his response in 46 is what has really gotten me to the point of confidence. I just do not see that response to a meta read coming from a Town mindset.
So, like I am glad that I pushed him over the meta stuff, but it ispost 46 that I think is where people should lookto decide if they want him to be the elim for today. I personally think it is pretty damning.
my best guess about his swap on his reads for me, you, and wayward son are just him trying to leave confusion on who he could be paired with once he flips.
Assuming he flips scum, I think he started playing up his stated scum meta when it got brought up and further analyzed since it would be fair to assume we would start looking for it. I believe he wants to put you, me, and Wayward in a WIFOM situation in hope of keeping the focus on the three of us once Day 2 starts. It's not like anyone else is really getting looked at anyway, right?
Not saying the three of us are cleared btw. But I believe scum will want to keep the three of us alive no matter the results of the flip. Personally, I think Bulge dies tonight, and I'll be looking more closely at Egix, Mix, Xlos, and Zyla tomorrow, assuming I survive.
---
Btw, what didn't you like about post 105? I'm curious since the only other person who didn't seem to like it was your scum read.- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
I guess. It just reads off to see someone skip RVS and seriously vote someone else based on their RVS.In post 140, Egix96 wrote:
I mean, with the site meya we have here, it kinda has to happen or else nothing will happen.In post 126, Roden wrote:There were two very fast wagons and some serious accusations thrown around very early into Day 1. It's just surprising seeing people push hard on their votes so early into the game.
Also, ftr, I didn't actually realise my vote was an E1 when I made it. Still fine with that tho.
Also, interesting to know about the vote but idk how that checks out. The post you voted T3 with explicitly says you spent a couple hours reading posts, and my only major post at the time mentioned that he was at E-2 and that anyone putting him at E-1 should be looked at. The part of my post you quoted and said you liked states this in the very next line. I'm not trying to fish for a "gotcha" moment here but I just find it hard to believe that you wouldn't have known.
Interesting, I kinda get what you mean reading it now. The Zyla/Wayward defense was partially contrarian admittedly, but I also just wasn't getting any scum vibes off either of them like others were. I still don't have a good read on Zyla since she started posting less when the focus shifted away from her, though I can say Wayward is leaning more town with every post. I did note though that they both jumped on T3 after getting sussed themselves.In post 142, Lukewarm wrote:
It felt very precise. Not sure if that is the right word, but I could see every single line of it being specially chosen to further a scum narrative.In post 139, Roden wrote:Btw, what didn't you like about post 105? I'm curious since the only other person who didn't seem to like it was your scum read.
- Lightly defend two people who have come under fire (zyla / Wayward Son) to get them on your side, without actually committing to a read on them.
Give a stance on T3 that neither furthers the push on them or comes across as defending them - more of a "if they sink, they sink" kind of thing. Like what does "just reads as...well, not scummish but definitely not town" even mean ??
Then hand wave all of mine and Mix's content as just analyzing RVS in order to murky the thread's perception of us to stop two townies from getting hard TRs too early.
But, like I said, it is a weak scum lean on you, and the rest of your posts don't necessarily give me that same vibe, so currently reevaluating
The T3 bit is because I couldn't tell if T3 was scum or just unhelpful/anti-town. He seemed way more active and solvey in another game, and a lot more stubborn too.
And the handwave is just because early town reads just seem unhelpful, I don't think town should tunnel on trusting those kinds of reads. Makes it easier for scum to mess up a NK too if they don't have a clear town read leader to auto-kill. Especially if we aren't guaranteed a Doctor/Jailer.
I agree with this more or less.In post 143, Lukewarm wrote:As an aside, looking back at where you mentioned him in 105 reminded me of my own thoughts on Wayward Son.
He mentioned posting in the newbie queue about read up on games, and I followed up on it. The posts are are indeed there, and seeing his tone, he was obviously excited to get into his first game. So after following up in that thread, it put me with Wayward Son as probably just new-excited-town instead of scummy for their entrance.
Him throwing out so many TRs in post 124 also helps build that read on him imo. Like I think new scum would be more hesitant with those in case they needed to push any of those people out.
That being said, he is still pretty low in content, so I cant really put give him more then a light town lean.- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
Who and what is this referring to?In post 147, T3 wrote:Not sure.
The response to the post was me responding to your pointabout the specific post you brought up.
Votes weren't spread out and I read the first few posts before I signed up.In post 148, The Bulge wrote:
how did you glean that from looking at the vote count?In post 126, Roden wrote:
There were two very fast wagons and some serious accusations thrown around very early into Day 1. It's just surprising seeing people push hard on their votes so early into the game.In post 114, The Bulge wrote:
what does this mean?In post 101, Roden wrote:Though looking at the vote count it looks like some people already have some spicy takes early into the game.
I mainly think that because you're a SE that's being universally town read, and Luke seems like the only other viable option.In post 149, The Bulge wrote:
I kinda like this theory, but I would be a terrible night kill, I'm scumreading half the game lolIn post 139, Roden wrote:I agree but especially with the bolded. His posts have been all over the place and I had no idea what he was doing for the longest time, since he seems so obvscum and isn't doing much to actually defend himself. I thought maybe he was just resigned to being voted out, but Bulge's meta sus about T3's weird distance strats rang some warning bells.
Assuming he flips scum, I think he started playing up his stated scum meta when it got brought up and further analyzed since it would be fair to assume we would start looking for it. I believe he wants to put you, me, and Wayward in a WIFOM situation in hope of keeping the focus on the three of us once Day 2 starts. It's not like anyone else is really getting looked at anyway, right?
Not saying the three of us are cleared btw. But I believe scum will want to keep the three of us alive no matter the results of the flip. Personally, I think Bulge dies tonight, and I'll be looking more closely at Egix, Mix, Xlos, and Zyla tomorrow, assuming I survive.
I'm thinking along the same lines. Zyla and Egix are my personal PoE choices, but I can't really get into why that is until Day 2. I don't think anyone will be sussing you if T3 flips town though. That will likely be Wayward, Zyla, Egix, and myself.In post 152, Lukewarm wrote:
I think depends on how T3 flips.In post 146, Roden wrote:UNVOTE:
General question for everyone. What's usually worth looking more into? An E-2 vote or an E-1 vote?
And since I want to put my vote somewhere else, VOTE: Egix96
Before Zyla voted, there was basically 1 person vocally pushing on him (me) and 1 person who was arguable trying to shift the focus off of himself (Wayward Son). Zyla hitched herself to that, putting him at e-2 and making it properly a wagon. That seems too early to bus, but about the right time for scum to join a wagon on a townie. So I think her slot will get some townie points if T3 does flip scum, but both me and Zyla will look pretty bad if he flips town.
Egix putting him at e-1 I think is equally likely from either alignment. I can easily see town!egix having a scum read on T3 by that point, but it also comes about the time that T3 starts changing around his reads, so maybe around the time the scum team decided that T3 was a sinking ship.
So overall, I think I want to look at the Zyla slot after a T3 flip, but I am not sure that the Egix vote helps me sort him.
That's understandable. I can see you just forgetting. Again, it isn't meant to be a "gotcha" but regardless I still have to look at you going forward.In post 153, Egix96 wrote:
While reading the five people after you in alphabetical order I must have forgotten you had said thatIn post 145, Roden wrote:Also, interesting to know about the vote but idk how that checks out. The post you voted T3 with explicitly says you spent a couple hours reading posts, and my only major post at the time mentioned that he was at E-2 and that anyone putting him at E-1 should be looked at. The part of my post you quoted and said you liked states this in the very next line. I'm not trying to fish for a "gotcha" moment here but I just find it hard to believe that you wouldn't have known.
This is a very reasonable take and I understand why you're wary of me. I don't have much of a defense here but I encourage you to keep an eye on me. I will say I haven't fully explained my thought process for a reason.In post 154, MixLixWix wrote:So I am/been running into the issue of a lot of people looking scummy to me; far beyond the two scum slots in the game. If anyone has any advice for this, I would love to hear it. Currently though, I feel I need to be a bit more black and white with how I am reading into things. Stuff like Wayward early tone, as I will explain below, I am hyper-fixaiting on rather than the bigger picture maybe? Not only should it help make it clear what I think, but also should narrow down the pool hopefully?
Speaking of being clearer, here are some answers or clarifications:
Spoiler:
As for right now, I have wayward up higher now. Their 91 and 124 shows some promise. The latter especially since it calls out part of the contraction I say in Roden's post. I reread the newbie queue to understand their posting habits better, and I feel fine leaving up the oddness of the slot's words to their posting style/who they are. I'd like more posts, but I want to look elsewhere than here.
UNVOTE:
This gets me to Roden. I find myself not really liking a lot of their posts. Luke/wayward pointed out some stuff that I picked up on. Their intro post was pretty noncommital despite the amount that was written. The lukewarm progression I also do not really understand at all. What hasn't been mentioned that has rubbed me wrong is the following:
The underline bothers me for two reasons. One is the tactic of associated towniness. I am not quite sure if it has an actual name, less so on here. But when I play IRL as scum, I heavily use this tactic. Basically, you find those who town heavily thinks is townie (like Lukewarm) and use language to associate yourself with them. Stuff like "Luke and I have been", "We might not be townie, but I feel X about us.", etc. This builds the notion in other heads that you and who you choose to associate with are collectively townie including you. There is more you can do with this of course later in the game. Roden does this two times. One by implying the trio of him, Luke, and Wayward are in a WIFOM situation which doesn't make sense. His rational for this statement is that no one else is getting looked at but them, but that isn't true. Not only would a T3 flip HEAVILY imply a town!Luke, but others are actually getting looked at like Zyla this phase. The statement plays up the fear of something non-realistic to multiply the association notion of solidarity. The second is the last part where he gives the notion they are closed to being clear with the throw away first statement while giving a reason for the three to be alive tomorrow.Assuming he flips scum, I think he started playing up his stated scum meta when it got brought up and further analyzed since it would be fair to assume we would start looking for it. I believe he wants to putyou[Likewarm], me, and Waywardin a WIFOM situation in hope of keeping the focus on the three of us once Day 2 starts. It's not like anyone else is really getting looked at anyway, right?
Not saying the three of us are cleared btw. But I believe scum will want to keep the three of us alive no matter the results of the flip.Personally, I think Bulge dies tonight, and I'll be looking more closely at Egix, Mix, Xlos, and Zyla tomorrow, assuming I survive.
Now wayward isn't the most towniest according to the thread poll, but Roden has been actively implying Wayward as townie since his earlier post, and part of the tactic is you can later use that association to justify a push on them when the thread sentiment changes. I wouldn't be surprised if scum!roden is purposely doing this to secure a elimination on wayward later on rather than potentially earlier due to the pressure people had on them earlier.
What also bothers me is Roden's fascination with who makes it to day 2 in general. Specifically the bulge nightkill prediction. While I don't think predicting the NK is scummy itself, the manner Roden is setting off alarms. Although Bulge is who he predicts is dying, Roden is choosing not to really interact with them. Besides a glancing remark about the early game voting, Roden has not interacted with Bulge. If I felt someone is heavily town and likely to die, I would be begging them to at least consider mentioning their full reads. Especially if they themselves have voiced they themselves doubt that (as bulge has done; meaning he is even less likely to provide info). This make the whole process seem disingenuous. Roden seems like he cares about getting town to the "best" D2 possible without really going about it how I expect a town member to do with the reads they conveyed.
I am running out of time before my online class, But I would like thoughts about the above. Some other reads I can explain more depth later are:
Euqix (the dog profile guy) I have town vibes from
Bulge I feel conformable not eliminating this day phase.
I really want T3 to post some form of Read list or a deep write up of what they are feeling. Mainly because on the off chance they are town, since a lot of the thread's dynamics would change. Until that happens, I think hammering is a terrible idea (on top of robbing us discussion time).
Though yeah I actually didn't think to try to get more info from Bulge. I think he just in general is keeping his posts more reserved in tone and content but has plenty to say if he feels the need to. Kind of a typical SE town playstyle from what I've seen in other games.
Partial town read. But I also just don't think he's partners with T3. Especially when going by Luke and Bulge's analysis.In post 156, Xlos wrote:Just realized I've been saying lynched a lot, it's a hard habit to break.
Your argument for Roden is pretty convoluted, I don't think I agree that associating with town is particularly scummy. But looking at the part of the post you quoted, it does confuse me, why would he think scum would kill the bulge? And why is Wayward not very suspicious, personally I think Wayward is very suspicious... but I guess many people disagrees with me on that. I think I'd like to hear Roden's reasoning on this.In post 154, MixLixWix wrote:So I am/been running into the issue of a lot of people looking scummy to me; far beyond the two scum slots in the game. If anyone has any advice for this, I would love to hear it.
[Roden is sus because blah]
Euqix (the dog profile guy) I have town vibes from
Bulge I feel conformable not eliminating this day phase.
I really want T3 to post some form of Read list or a deep write up of what they are feeling. Mainly because on the off chance they are town, since a lot of the thread's dynamics would change. Until that happens, I think hammering is a terrible idea (on top of robbing us discussion time).
I think we're on the same page here.In post 160, Zyla wrote:
I'll be honest, I was thinking of this as more than just a joke, although if I'm wrong, there are 2 or 3 people who could tell me otherwiseIn post 155, Xlos wrote:It's a joke, I'm basically claiming to be a townie because the premise is false. (Unless I'm selling out my teammate lol)
- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
I believe Zyla is town. Scum wouldn't make those posts, not even newbscum, and as I said earlier I think she's experienced with this game.
Her and Egix were my two PoE for T3's partner but now it really only leaves Egix. Even if T3 somehow flips town I still don't think Egix looks good.
I believe T3 wants to be hammered ASAP at this point so there's less information to dissect Day 2. His theoretical partner has very little suspicion on them and an ongoing Day 1 threatens that. That's why I refrained from hammering, and potentially why Egix put T3 at hammer range. Maybe to tempt someone to hammer a player who looks like obvscum.
There is another potential but unlikely T3 partner. Does anyone think Wayward vs T3 could've just been scum vs scum?- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
Yeah we know.In post 186, T3 wrote:fwiw Xlos and Zyla slipped as masons. Don't trust any prs claims.
I didn't get any scum vs scum vibes either but I wanted to get opinions on it just in case. Wayward being scum was only technically a possibility for me, just very unlikely. I'm gonna try not to tunnel tomorrow but I'm 90% sure Egix is scum.In post 179, MixLixWix wrote:
What comes off to you as mafia vs mafia?In post 172, Roden wrote:There is another potential but unlikely T3 partner. Does anyone think Wayward vs T3 could've just been scum vs scum?
I don't think wayward/T3 are scum together for the fact that I don't really see him urgent to line up someone to eliminate after T3 is voted out. The closest he has gotten is saying Zyla/you are suspects, but neither read is deeply formulated.- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
What makes it suboptimal? Either we're flat out wrong or we caught you. What do we gain from not hammering you when no one will feasibly be able to trust you if we hammer someone else?In post 188, T3 wrote:Hammering me is suboptimal but unless someone has any huge new things to spice it up I'm fine with it. I think my posting sounded weird because I was tired.
Furthermore why aren't you building a case for yourself? You've hardly responded directly to anyone's posts. And you've weakly pushed on like four different people but gave us nothing to work with.- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
Ah, alright I can get that.
I'll just sign off by saying I don't think any scum team plans to sacrifice their partner before RVS even really ends, wastes that scum partner's distractions by actively posting and pressuring townies, then brings the game down to a 1v1 on Day 2. Especially when I've actively cleared and town read every other player as the Day progressed. - Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden
- Roden