Large Normal 233 | Random videos I liked | Over !
Forum rules
- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Okay, reading everything to catch up now. I'm at the end of page 5 and I'm not understanding the evolution of peta's argument. It started with scum reading Dwlee99 for being too pedantic when it just seemed like he was disagreeing with DGB's strategy. And now if anything peta's posts are just trying to twist anything they can to put the fire on other people over nothing. I really haven't played much mafia and I'm not familiar with petapan as a player, but their playstyle this game seems overly aggro.
Unofficial vote on peta here. gonna continue reading- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
I can't see how Dwlee disagreeing about strategy can generate such a strong reaction from you that you feel a "correct" argument is bogging things down? Like even if it's slightly pedantic, aren't those the exact discussions that should help town align on a strategy? Especially when someone is suggesting a strategy for the group to follow on one of the first pages of the game. AND you go on to say that you don't necessarily agree with DGB's strategy....then what's your suggestion? ignore making any semblance of a plan rather than determine a path forward and work to make town's plan better? It's weird to not take a stance on DGB's early suggestion, but then scum read someone for openly saying they disagree with it.In post 287, petapan wrote:
yes that's about what i was getting at - bogging things down in some boring "correct" argument is how i'd expect scum to approach someone coming out with a wacky plan to start the day - it's an easy point to make and offers basically nothing. i hit him with my vote for it and didn't like the response.In post 217, VFP wrote:
This doesn't read like someone who's unhappy at Dwlee for not following DGB's plan. It seems to be more about how it was shut down and the reaction Dwlee given. I'm not saying I agree, but let's not read a story here.In post 67, petapan wrote:nevermind that i was the first one to engage dwlee and call him scum, my point is way less baking up dgb and ore that the way dwlee chose to engage and turn things into a pedantic argument about how not to play where he could make an "ideal" theoretical point about how "we shouldn't play it like mountainous" that glosses over what dgb is actually trying to say (we should emphasize dayplay and minimize decisions based on mechanical speculation, basic stuff). in the process he steers the conversation toward something non-game-advancing, that is, arguing about "well of course you should consider claims in a normal setup". and when i immediately jump him after that he responds not like someone who has genuine conviction in what he's arguing but cornered scum who doesn't know how to react
Peta can explain some thought process into this and why Dwlee is scum here.
nero of course is dead set on trying to misconstrue that i was arguing that no one should claim at all in accordance with dgb, which is not what i was trying to say and i don't think someone making an honest reading could get that (except T3, but he's a special case)- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
\In post 292, petapan wrote:
players in neighborhoods can be PRs or have no other powers - it used to be that neighbors were usually otherwise vanilla but PRs in hoods are more common nowIn post 288, Dragon of the West wrote:Okay, thanks. And are those threads usually related to specific PRs or is it possible for vanilla roles to have access to PTs?
real quick - you've been away from the site for a while, have you played mafia at all in the meantime? do you remember the games you played on this site at all?
I haven't played any mafia since I've been away from the site, but I've played deception-type games like Secret Hitler. And I don't remember anything meaningful from the couple games I did play (I think I only played 2). I think I remember getting targeted really early the game I was mafia and played it poorly.- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
So I understand there's going to be a meta and I'm not suggesting a conference as necessary; but if someone disagrees about DGB's suggestion I don't see the harm in openly disagreeing. Maybe that's because I tend to be a pedantic person myself, I see value in some minutia. But also, isn't DGB suggesting a strategy offhand early on just as derailing and promoting the "conference" you want to avoid? The meta is so established that nothing is worth discussing to you, so why botherIn post 300, petapan wrote:
sigh. please refer to my question asking about how much mafia you have played because this site has been around a while and the meta for playing most setups is fairly well established: run someone up, ask for a claim, people decide if they believe the claim or not, if they believe it or don't want to kill it that day we move on to a new target. it's not like we need to get together and conference every game for deciding how we're going to play, i'm not sure why you would expect it to be that way? like this is going to be a real uphill battle if i'm gonna have to give you the mafia 101 crash courseIn post 295, Dragon of the West wrote:I can't see how Dwlee disagreeing about strategy can generate such a strong reaction from you that you feel a "correct" argument is bogging things down? Like even if it's slightly pedantic, aren't those the exact discussions that should help town align on a strategy? Especially when someone is suggesting a strategy for the group to follow on one of the first pages of the game. AND you go on to say that you don't necessarily agree with DGB's strategy....then what's your suggestion? ignore making any semblance of a plan rather than determine a path forward and work to make town's plan better? It's weird to not take a stance on DGB's early suggestion, but then scum read someone for openly saying they disagree with it.
the point dgb was making was that recently normal setups have been outright trollish in their design and people have lost town games by making bad assumptions about setup mechanics. "play the game as if it were mountainous is" is obviously an extreme suggestion but at the heart of it favoring dayplay over claims isn't bad. dwlee's retort to that post was pedantic, and i felt trying to drag things into the realm of pure theory scummy- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Yeah I just didn't remember the neighborhood thing. I don't think I played enough in my first go around for that kind of stuff to really stick.In post 301, petapan wrote:
i asked because you were in a hood in one of your old games, granted i don't necessarily expect you to remember stuff from 5 years ago but was maybe a little concerned you might be playing up the angle of being unfamiliar to get townread, like the newbie card. that's paranoid of me tho, oi think so far you've been all rightIn post 299, Dragon of the West wrote:
\In post 292, petapan wrote:
players in neighborhoods can be PRs or have no other powers - it used to be that neighbors were usually otherwise vanilla but PRs in hoods are more common nowIn post 288, Dragon of the West wrote:Okay, thanks. And are those threads usually related to specific PRs or is it possible for vanilla roles to have access to PTs?
real quick - you've been away from the site for a while, have you played mafia at all in the meantime? do you remember the games you played on this site at all?
I haven't played any mafia since I've been away from the site, but I've played deception-type games like Secret Hitler. And I don't remember anything meaningful from the couple games I did play (I think I only played 2). I think I remember getting targeted really early the game I was mafia and played it poorly.- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Alright, starting to catch up on new posts:
I don't think aggression alone is scummy; I think aggression combined with irrationality and/or it being different from a person's normal gameplay is scummy. And I just don't agree with your rationalization of your scum reads and the points you kept twisting to make claims about Dwlee & Nero. I read it as very "you going on the offensive so someone else is always forced to defend". Like I prefaced in that post, I'm not familiar with you as a player so I'll have to go through some old games of yours to see if going super aggro is town behavior from you; I just haven't had time to go through any of your recent games yet. That's why I made it an unofficial vote. But the aggro + (imo) irrational takes is what made that an initial scum read.In post 295, Dragon of the West wrote: also, sorry for traveling back in time, but i'm just catching up here so i'll be hopping back and forth
is aggression scummy to you?In post 274, Dragon of the West wrote:Okay, reading everything to catch up now. I'm at the end of page 5 and I'm not understanding the evolution of peta's argument. It started with scum reading Dwlee99 for being too pedantic when it just seemed like he was disagreeing with DGB's strategy. And now if anything peta's posts are just trying to twist anything they can to put the fire on other people over nothing. I really haven't played much mafia and I'm not familiar with petapan as a player, but their playstyle this game seems overly aggro.
Unofficial vote on peta here. gonna continue reading- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
You are correct. I played my first couple games like 5 years ago, stopped playing altogether, and now this is my first game back.In post 332, Andresvmb wrote:
Oh I see that you’re actually inexperienced - played some Newbie games some years ago, and came back for this game. Is that a correct summation of your experience? Because you doIn post 288, Dragon of the West wrote:Okay, thanks. And are those threads usually related to specific PRs or is it possible for vanilla roles to have access to PTs?soundinexperienced, but I don’t want to assume anything.- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
I don't see that as likely. I feel like if peta & dgb were scum together, peta wouldn't have gone so hard at the detractors of DGB's plan off the bat. That just seems like a situation where another scum would stay neutralIn post 513, osuka wrote:someone tell me if i'm being a moron
does a peta/dgb scumteam sound plausible? i don't feel like i have a great grip on their interactions so far, especially since most have been effectively by proxy- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
the issue I take with this argument is in that same post where you said "I can play aggressive as either alignment", you then specifically linked me to a game where you played a cautious scum. That seems manipulative even if your words preceding that were trying to project the sense of a neutral self-assessment. And it just feels like cherry-picking on your part.In post 552, petapan wrote:
the argument that me playing a certain way is null is worthless? like dude you just seemed to have jumped intoattacking what i was saying without bothering to understand it, and you're accusing me of not understandingg youIn post 545, osuka wrote:that's a moronic reply to what i just said
if you're acutely aware of that _and_ highly confident of it, as can be concluded from 538, there is quite literally nothing stopping you from intentionally playing differently in order to achieve a goal (whatever that may be) - thus rendering the self-meta argument worthless
i seriously hope i wont have to explain everything in detail to you for the rest of the game
how would i "intentionally play different to achieve a goal" off the statement "i can play aggressive as either alignment"? it's only saying that a certain behavior isn't a scumtell for me, there's nothing for me to manipulate because i've just self-described it as null
if you want to say "i'm more likely to be aggressive as town" is worthless, then sure, whatever, you're under no obligation to believe me! but you don't have to blow a gasket over it. you seem to be flying off the handle over a reflexive dislike of self-meta, but this seems to be a discussion that is almost entirely in the theoretical realm that is unlikely to be useful to the game we are actually playing right now
can you take a breather and calm down for a minute? what are your reads right now?
VOTE: petapan- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Can you direct me to a town game of yours where you were very aggressive, particularly early in the game? I don't care about examples where you were cautious. I quickly looked through a couple of your ISOs and didn't see an instance, but you have so many games and threads that there's no way for me to thoroughly check that. Even without the aggro, I still think your reasoning in the early game was scummy.In post 559, petapan wrote:you mentioned going through my previous games and i directed you to one because i'd already posted it. is it manipulative to provide something you're looking for?
(uh, i butchered that and stuck my reply in the middle of the quote)- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
I've been focusing on you because you're my strongest read so far. But a couple of my reads in no particular order:In post 560, petapan wrote: an inordinate amount of your posting has been focused solely on me. do you have reads on other players in the game?
Lean Town:
Titus - Scumhunting, scum wouldn't have a reason to make posts like 514 and 520
DGB - I agree DBG probably wouldn't put themselves out there and make that early game pos ti f they're mafia. Their follow-up posts seem to have real conviction, not like a mafia just doubling down for appearances. I don't think their early post alone warranted as much confidence in them as you seemed to immediately have, but I agree it's townie.
nom - I like their activity and thinking so far. sort of unrelated, but I also agree with them that we shouldn't be so eager to lynch a lurk spot without even trying to get them to be active first (through votes or otherwise)
Lean scum:
Peta - I didn't like how hard and fast you came out thinking Dwlee must've been scum for disagreeing with DGB's early post. That and the ensuing convo with Nero really seemed like you just going full offensive to deflect as much as possible. And I think your town read of DGB was too strong, too early for what they had posted (this is based on my memory of when you started seeming confident in your DGB read)
Kyouko - I feel like they haven't produced a lot of their own content. Mostly just quoting walls of text and then giving one line. I also don't like the dismissiveness about the pt and when asked questions
Rathe - This is mostly gut. Their early sheeping convos were weird to me- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Nom can you explain your feelings on the Kyo wagon? You had your vote on them, the things you originally scumread them for haven't changed or been rationalized by you or Kyo, you drop your vote to reread, and then you completely omit them from your follow-upIn post 702, nomnomnom wrote:okay so upon rereading I think I scumlean towards T3 and STD the most
T3 hands out townreads very easily and yet does feel so much more reluctant calling anyone scum which feels like a big red flag to me.
STD feels like a slot posting for the sake of posting, I can see scum easily posting stuff like
mostly only posts when mentioned, 615 also feels really preemptive defense when vfp didn't say why he scumread himIn post 44, Save The Dragons wrote:what if you're shit at crumbing things
i can't believe i forgot to vote
VOTE: osuka
the only post I think could indicate town!std is this one
but again very little reasoning towards the votes, and the vote on Dunn feels like a safe non committal voteIn post 597, Save The Dragons wrote:VOTE: Dunnstral
i like osuka for town
i like petapan for town
i like titus for town
i like nero cain for town
I wish I could vote both slots, but I think std's iso is much more scummy
VOTE: std- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
In post 698, T3 wrote:Huh. ssbm is very scummy but I'm hesitant to lim him because of the neighborhood. Also Dragon of the West and osuka are townreads from reading the past few pages.What changed that made you overcome your hesitancy?
- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
In post 760, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I think if Nero is right about TvT Dwlee/peta (he also posits DGB but I disagree) that Dragon of the West makes sense as scum. Just finished a full reread in that frame of mind and realized DotW's catchup only looks like a catchup but seems to just build into a manufactured vote on a popular scumread Peta.
It seems odd to me that nobody, even Peta noticed that the game that he "specifically linked" to DotW had in fact been posted long before a game had been requested in the "Mod Meta" post. DotW cites "cherry picking" as a reason to vote Peta, which is a reason Nero brings up early on to scumread Peta, iirc. I know Nero used the term and I believe newbscum!DotW stole that to manufacture a scumread on Peta.
VOTE: DotW
Provide quotes when you can.In post 761, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I can get quotes but I'm on mobile atm. Combined iso peta/DotW for.context
Tbh, I didn't realize the game he originally linked me was the one he already linked in his Mod Meta post until he mentioned it. However, my point was he tried using that specific game to rationalize his play this game and that was a game where he played cautious scum...and then used that to say he couldn't be aggressive scum this game. I felt it would've made more sense to show me a game where he had played aggressive town (I'm reading through the aggro town game he later linked atm). Also, if you did read my ISO I made it clear in that I had a scum read on him independent of what I considered him to be cherry picking the game he linked- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
The really strange thing about this post to me after reading through your ISO is that you haven't really made a strong claim about Nero and the entirety of your "full reread" that leads to you thinking I'm scum is based on the premise of "if Nero is right about TvT Dwlee/peta"In post 760, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I think if Nero is right about TvT Dwlee/peta (he also posits DGB but I disagree) that Dragon of the West makes sense as scum. Just finished a full reread in that frame of mind and realized DotW's catchup only looks like a catchup but seems to just build into a manufactured vote on a popular scumread Peta.
It seems odd to me that nobody, even Peta noticed that the game that he "specifically linked" to DotW had in fact been posted long before a game had been requested in the "Mod Meta" post. DotW cites "cherry picking" as a reason to vote Peta, which is a reason Nero brings up early on to scumread Peta, iirc. I know Nero used the term and I believe newbscum!DotW stole that to manufacture a scumread on Peta.
VOTE: DotW
Also, I'm pretty sure one of my very first posts said I was scumreading peta, well before peta had linked me to anything that I would've called cherry picking- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Kyo really seems scummy to me. If Kyo and Anya are the only people in the neighborhood, it could not even be a neighborhood and they could just both be mafia doing some weird gambit. I'm not as strong on Anya but the whole thing between those 2 is weirdIn post 773, Nero Cain wrote:let's pretend that ssbm and anya have bubonic plague (yes ppl still get it) and not go near them- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
It felt dumb to type that but honestly nothing about that pt makes sense. Neither of them have explained themselves in a way I consider to be satisfactory and now with minimal information about what was actually said in the pt, Anya is completely with Kyo to the point that they're sheepingIn post 779, petapan wrote:
this literally never happensIn post 774, Dragon of the West wrote:If Kyo and Anya are the only people in the neighborhood, it could not even be a neighborhood and they could just both be mafia doing some weird gambit.- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Anya can you explain more specifics about what's been discussed in the neighborhood that's led you to feel this way about KyoIn post 764, Anya wrote:i've lost all passion and energy i think i need a mafia break after this game
VOTE: dragon of the west sheeping my neighbour bc he's town with a good read or is bussing- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
This take makes no sense to me. You sheeping would mean you just blindly trust kyo's vote which would require them to be town...but then you say they might be bussing. Do you think they're town or not and if you think they might not be why are you so sure that scum!Kyo would only be bussing instead of voting someone they know is town?In post 764, Anya wrote:i've lost all passion and energy i think i need a mafia break after this game
VOTE: dragon of the west sheeping my neighbour bc he's town with a good read or is bussing- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
I'm fucking stupid I didn't think about how them being 'neighbor' would be shown in their role if either of them flipped. Still, since they're the only 2 in the hood they could both just be scum. I just hate everything about their interactions/explanationsIn post 801, petapan wrote: yes, well, there is obvious incentive for scum to fake scumhunting in that situation. in a situation where neither are in a hood, claiming to be in a hood together is a terrible play because if one ever flips the other is doomed. it's not a gambit anyone realistically attempts- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Dwlee - if you're ignoring the neighbors, give a few specific players you're looking to push.In post 870, Dwlee99 wrote:I don't want to think about the neighbors right now.
My current vote preference:
1) peta
2) kyo
3) anya
4) one of the lurkers
Town reads/leans:
- DGB
- T3
- Nom
Confused by:
Nero- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
So you think no one that's been active is scummy enough to vote over a lurker? Or at least push further before settling on a lurker?In post 880, Dwlee99 wrote:
One of the lurkers I think is our best bet. There are enough of them that I wouldn't be surprised if most of the game has just been town yelling at each other.In post 877, Dragon of the West wrote:
Dwlee - if you're ignoring the neighbors, give a few specific players you're looking to push.In post 870, Dwlee99 wrote:I don't want to think about the neighbors right now.
My current vote preference:
1) peta
2) kyo
3) anya
4) one of the lurkers
Town reads/leans:
- DGB
- T3
- Nom
Confused by:
Nero- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
I mean if it comes down to needing votes to lim anya over someone that's not on my list, then sure. They're on my list because I'm willing to vote them. I'd still like to see more activity from some & wait for people to come back from VLA and post catchups before trying to consolidate wagonsIn post 881, DrippingGoofball wrote:@DotW
Can I convince you to vote Anya?
Coming out as a neighbor and starting neighbor drama so early in the game has been bugging me from the beginning, and the more I think about it, the scummier it is.- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Damn dude gimme a sec I'm getting there lolIn post 891, petapan wrote:@dragon of the westIn post 878, petapan wrote:hey dude, remind me again why you think i'm scum? because i'm "going full offensive to deflect as much as possible", right? do you think that's what scum do? explain your thinking here- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
-your arguments in that early game seemed irrationalIn post 878, petapan wrote:hey dude, remind me again why you think i'm scum? because i'm "going full offensive to deflect as much as possible", right? do you think that's what scum do? explain your thinking here
-combined with how aggro you were being it seemed like playing defense through offense
-I haven't liked a lot of your takes since and you've seemed very reactive
-your interactions with other people I'm scumreading have added onto my suspicions of you
If you give me a little bit I was going to go through posts to find the specific ones I remember bothering me. I was originally doing that but you got impatient so I wanted to give you this to satiate you until I pull the other posts together- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
@peta - forgot to mention me not liking how fast you strongly townread DGB but we've already talked about this in circles
304 - this seemed disingenuous. you had to have known most of the votes you were referring to weren't of substance
312 - It really seems like your argument here was predicated on the idea that Dwlee must be scum because he made an 'easy' argument...which is just a weird jump to me. or you're thinking that the DGB vs Dwlee convo had to be TvS? which again I don't like that assumption
538 - gonna be honest, I remembered this post very differently in my head before re-reading it. I thought I remembered you linking that game...not just mentioning a game you already linked. And I remembered the tone being different. Not sure it makes a difference overall, but me thinking this specific post was scummy might have been a bit of confbias because on re-read I don't see it
648 - idk...I think this is a convenient answer of how you immediately 'knew' where DGB was coming from but I don't know if it's fully believable. this explanation alone isn't scummy though. And this is what's going to keep getting re-hashed like in 758
Your interactions with kyo and posts where you've mentioned them have just seemed strange to me. like it hasn't seemed to me like either of you put your heart into it. especially for someone you've said you're unsure of. I would've expected a lot more inquisitiveness from you, based on how you've been pushing other players:
316,486,619,647
648 - you asked me specifically about any reads I had because I was focusing on you too much so I gave you 639. the only thing you responded to my read list with was your response to my scum read of you.
753 - can you explain your reads on why anya is scummier than kyouko. You've said it a couple times but I haven't seen you say why
840 - you don't find it strange that something in the pt magically happened and the anya/kyo thing evaporated?
also, you gave me a hard time for focusing on you so much. and then are like "wait a sec, focus on me again and re-explain your read on me" which I don't know if it's totally scummy, but man it's annoying- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
@nero 900
I think you've made A LOT of posts to sift through and I'm not going to pick through your ISO rn, but some of your posts seem like good logic and others really seem like nitpicking/twisting people's intentions. It's hard for me to tell if that's just you scumhunting or actually trying to just muddy the waters everywhere- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
You gotta go with strawberry mango. Wawa's fruit smoothies>>>In post 1000, Dwlee99 wrote:
Caramel Cream.In post 998, VFP wrote:
What is it?In post 997, Dwlee99 wrote:Peta, I'm convinced that if I told you my favorite Wawa smoothie you'd think it was scum-indicative.- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
990
To be honest, I think part of my read on you being strongest is the fact that you've produced so much more content than my other scum reads. You've just had a higher number of scummy posts...by nature of having more posts. Day 1 reads are tough, especially since so many people have been pretty inactive- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Nah, this ain't it. I'm not seeing why people started SRing DGB. Their style of posts haven't changed at all since the same people town read them at the start of the game, even if you find their most recent posts, to quote you, "cringe"
- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
What does the first part of this mean. I think my brain is fried and it's only MondayIn post 1086, VFP wrote:I only go for this as scum or 100% certain that's shown enough in my games.- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
1127
On mobile so I don't feel like quoting and formatting that whole post but when he said list specific players didn't you ask about like 10 people? Not saying anything about the validity of asking for reads but I felt like I remember you responding with a huge list which was so big it was obvious he wouldn't give reads on after refusing to make a reads list- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
I feel like I'm dumb reading this. I don't understand this thought process from town or scum. I'm amazed Day 1 town would want to 1v1... If you're wrong and you're town you're essentially giving scum 2 free town lims. If you're scum you're essentially putting yourself on a platter unless you think the person you're accusing will get limmed day 1 and then you can wriggle out of it day 2 by going "oops". Can someone tell me why I'm wrong?In post 1078, VFP wrote:I think there's evidence here that I am scum or Nom is.
If Nom flips town I'm claiming scum. We can vote either of us first.- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Weird grouping of 3 when I've been just as active if not more active than T3 and Kyo. Not everyone can post 50 times a dayIn post 1220, Nero Cain wrote:DOTW, Andre, Dunn are barely playing and the derek slot is still empty- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
My point was I feel like it was obvious he wasn't going to give you reads if you asked for that such a long list of "specific" people. Whether or not he's scummy for not wanting to give a full read list, I'm not sure. I agree he should have provided SOME reads though. Independent of that, giving him a big list you know he won't fill out so that you can just hammer that point over and over just feels misleading at best thoughIn post 1240, Nero Cain wrote:What's your point? yes it was a pretty big list but I don't see how that makes it less bad. The only thing is that you could maybe argue that scum wouldn't be so blatantly scummy but sometimes scum just do scummy things. IDK, refusing to give stances is bad.- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Infuriates me = scum is not the best take I've seen. Half the people in this game have been outright rude to each other repeatedly lolIn post 1245, Dwlee99 wrote:
It is like every post is meant to infuriate me in a subtle way that I think means it is scum.In post 1236, Dragon of the West wrote:Nah, this ain't it. I'm not seeing why people started SRing DGB. Their style of posts haven't changed at all since the same people town read them at the start of the game, even if you find their most recent posts, to quote you, "cringe"
- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
I'm just not seeing how that can be AI unless you take issue with the actual game-related content in the postsIn post 1249, Dwlee99 wrote:
It's about the way it irritates me though. There is a qualitative difference between how DGB's posts bother me and the way that the people being rude bothers me.In post 1248, Dragon of the West wrote:
Infuriates me = scum is not the best take I've seen. Half the people in this game have been outright rude to each other repeatedly lolIn post 1245, Dwlee99 wrote:
It is like every post is meant to infuriate me in a subtle way that I think means it is scum.In post 1236, Dragon of the West wrote:Nah, this ain't it. I'm not seeing why people started SRing DGB. Their style of posts haven't changed at all since the same people town read them at the start of the game, even if you find their most recent posts, to quote you, "cringe"
- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
There have been a handful of interactions I've found unnecessarily rude between people, but that might just be the nature of mafia games. If you actually care I'll go through the game thread and point some out when I have time on my lunch or after work tomorrow.In post 1250, Nero Cain wrote:Who is being rude? the only one that seems slightly toxic has been peta. DGB and Titus are just scum though.
DGB is definitely town though. You're dead wrong on that read.
With that I'm calling it a night. I'll check in throughout the day tomorrow to see if anyone can tell me why anything VFP is doing makes sense- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Not really man. For me strength of read is something like (Scumminess of individual) * (Confidence in read). I'm more confident in my read on you because of all your posts and interactions I've found scummy. And it's not even that I'm 100% on you or anything it's just that I'm so unsure of Anya, Kyo, and some of the other less active people. I do want to spend my energy elsewhere for now though to try and get a better grip on everything that happened yesterdayIn post 1256, petapan wrote:
bullshit answer dudeIn post 1235, Dragon of the West wrote:990
To be honest, I think part of my read on you being strongest is the fact that you've produced so much more content than my other scum reads. You've just had a higher number of scummy posts...by nature of having more posts. Day 1 reads are tough, especially since so many people have been pretty inactive- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
My read on DGB isn't about 17 and that never was the only reason. I think DGB has played like paranoid town. And honestly it just reads to me like they can't figure out if the VFP play is real. If you're paranoid town you're worried that VFP and nom are scum together and that if one gets limmed then the other gets suuuuper towncred. All I see DGB doing is laying the thought process out in the thread to argue that if one of those lims gets through we don't treat the other like conftownIn post 1269, Nero Cain wrote:
Is your town read on DBG based on their style not changing? Are you upset that the game state changed?In post 1236, Dragon of the West wrote:I'm not seeing why people started SRing DGB. Their style of posts haven't changed at all since the same people town read them at the start of the game
what about all the posts trying to subtly imply that nomm is being bussed?
In post 1243, DrippingGoofball wrote:Or they're both scum and one is guaranteed to bask in towncred after one dies.In post 1184, DrippingGoofball wrote:
I suppose he could bus both his buddies.In post 1180, Nero Cain wrote:y bus nom when he could have just easily mislynched me?
But won't actually take a stance b/c DGB needs "clarity". That must be one good feeling fence.In post 1179, DrippingGoofball wrote:Hey peta, what are the odds that VFP is doing a textbook day 1 bus?
manipulation is very scummy says DGB and DGB is doing plenty of it.
That's what I'm being pushed on but when given a chance to list an example of me being manipulative couldn't provide an example.
So why is DGB town, still just town reading based on 17?- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
This duel doesn't make flawless sense from town perspective either. Even if you're town, I'm supposed to trust your read 100%. And if you are town AND you're wrong then we just limmed two town to start the gameIn post 1290, VFP wrote:Do you notice that they unvote rather than vote scum me?
Thats because scum do not want flips within me and Nom here, Nom included.
Even the "self vote" was a shitty attempt at AtE like I called. Nom agreed that they should be okay with the lim on them to find me as scum, and suddenly unvotes and not even votes me?
This shows that the self vote and posting was just fake yesterday.
Osuka, where you at?
Too many players are trying to dodge this behaviour from Nom. Get to voting there!
Or even me. I really don't give a shit other than voting outside of us.
SCUM. DO. NOT. WANT. THIS. DUAL!
Scum are not voting in us.
Look at who's voting, and who's dodging. It says a lot.- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
What makes you think I'd just vote you here? You just love saying random shit. My specific vote list I gave earlier was Peta, Kyo, Anya, lurker.In post 1338, Nero Cain wrote:lets be real here man (vpf) we prob don't have the votes for a nom lynch. DOTW and Andre prob just vote me here. Could see Dunn maybe vote me but IDK. Anya and STD won't vote nom. Even if osuka and omega come over we still don't have enough and a persumable town peta is scumsiding so I don't think we could count on his vote. I think the only way we could lynch scum if we all go to Titus or Rathe.
"Oh yeah everyone just vote between these other two people I decided because I made up info about where people will vote"- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
The whole point is that DGB isn't sure if nom is just getting bussed or not so they don't want to tip the scales in a way that might benefit scum. How could they be sure? And your last line completely dismisses the possiblity of what DGB is afraid of:In post 1341, Nero Cain wrote:
naw she's just fence-sitting. If she's town that thinks nom is getting bussed she just votes nom and gets a scum lynched. No way DGB thinks that VFP is going to escape night actions. And if DGB just wants the thought process/warning out there ok it's out there....so where's the action? no DGB needs "clarity" but isn't asking any questions or doing anything proactive. DGB is straddling that fence b/c scum don't know what to do about this 1v1, whether that makes it TvT or nom is infact caught scum, idk.In post 1317, Dragon of the West wrote:If you're paranoid town you're worried that VFP and nom are scum together and that if one gets limmed then the other gets suuuuper towncred. All I see DGB doing is laying the thought process out in the thread to argue that if one of those lims gets through we don't treat the other like conftown
"DGB must be scum because they're unsure of what to do and by extension that means it's either TvT or Nom is caught scum because if it was bussing then scum would know so DGB would know because I'm saying they're scum". You're just starting with a thought you like and create a complete circle of logic to get you where you want to go from there to prove the original thought. But proving your original guess relies on the the original guess being factual. Here's a post by you:
-dumb idea
-bunch of random bullshit that MIGHT make sense if the original dumb idea is 100% true
-random bullshit that started with dumb idea
-random bullshit "proves" it's true
-repeat circle- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Fuck I had such a long post typed out replying to this and it didn't post for some reason. After this meeting I'll rewrite itIn post 1345, Nero Cain wrote:
Do you think he's scum that is trying to lynch nom here or town that thinks nom is scum?In post 1344, Dragon of the West wrote:This duel doesn't make flawless sense from town perspective either.- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
That's the problem. He could be either of those things or he could be scum bussing nom.In post 1345, Nero Cain wrote:
Do you think he's scum that is trying to lynch nom here or town that thinks nom is scum?In post 1344, Dragon of the West wrote:This duel doesn't make flawless sense from town perspective either.
If he's scum bussing nom - it a good lim because we get scum. But we can't just give vfp conftown just because nom flips scum
If he's scum limmng town!nom - we'd have to make sure he can't go "lol whoops my b I was wrong" to wriggle out of getting limmed. But then you're hesitant to lim him because what if it was TvT and he was just wrong. Here it's obviously a bad lim
If he's Town that just THINKS he found scum!nom - bad to do this lim (especially on day 1) as a 1v1 because if he's wrong we limmed town and now we pretty much are forced into deciding whether it was an awful town strat or scum and even if he's right we aren't gonna conftown him anyway because of the way he did it.
Frankly I'm not sold on VFPs argument against nom that makes him so sure. If anything in this scenario you'd lim vfp first since he's the one pushing for the 1v1 but even after he flips you'd have to figure out if he was bussing (if flipped scum) or if you trust him being so sure (if flipped town). Either way I don't like it. And you both are insinuating it "says a lot" about the people not voting either of them but well over half the players never voted the 1v1 so I don't really think you have a point- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
fucking thank you. I had to hit back like 20 times but it workedIn post 1353, Nero Cain wrote:you might be able to hit back on your browser, it works for me sometimes.- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
I don't think it's scummy of DGB to reflect on their own reads day 1 and think about if they're misreading scum, what strategy those scum could be tryingIn post 1147, DrippingGoofball wrote:
That's what I'm trying to figure out.In post 1143, Dwlee99 wrote:Is nom town or is VFP bussing?
I'm townreading nom, but VFP's behavior is classic bus'ing, VFP is so sure nom will flip scum and he will bask in towncred, it gives me pause.
DGB: I'm townreading nom, but if I'm wrong and nom flips scum I'm worried VFP would be treated like conftown
1158 - worried about scum hiding in nom wagon. "lots of possibilities."
I really think DGB is just trying to think through the scenarios and is unsure about what the strat could be which is why their vote wasn't on the 1v1. I know I don't like the strategy for the reasons I've laid out so my vote didn't touch the 1v1- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
I'm over how much day 1 has spiraled. Maybe people can consolidate and settle on a lim so we can get a flip and actually move on.
I want to vote:
Peta, Kyo, Anya
Would vote for lurking:
Dunnstral
Would like to see their catchups on this 1v1 BS before deciding:
osuka, andresvmb, ChaosOmega
If forced to settle on someone else:
Rathe- I almost think this slot is worth a lurky vote. So many empty posts or 5 posts to say what could have been said in 1 post.
VFP - I don't really want to touch either side of this 1v1 but mechanically it makes more sense to lim VFP first. How over the top they were about the 1v1 rubbed me the wrong way especially since I feel like it's a shitty town play
Would want to re-assess on D2:
Nero, STD, Dwlee, nom (unless their replacement does something before the end of D1 that gives me a strong read)
Town:
DGB
Lean town:
T3, Titus
No one seems to be into voting peta/anya/kyo with me so once those people I mentioned provide catchups I'll try compromising on a vote with people- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
It makes me feel dirty that I might end up on this wagon you're startIng but also voting Dunn is more out of principle
- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
DGB, can you enlighten me here. We're looking at only 2 posts to go off
- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
I can see this. If I joined a game with 1500 posts on day 1 I'd be unmotivated to read everything. I'm satisfied with this for now and would prefer to wait until Day 2 to read this slot.In post 1531, ChaosOmega wrote:
I wasn't demotivated after opening my role PM, I was sent my role asking for confirmation with my replacement announcement not posted in the game. I confirmed and asked if I had to wait to post. By the time it happened, I had started work for the day. I got demotivated trying to read through this entire game.In post 1526, DrippingGoofball wrote:
Just a player who got demotivated when opening a red role PM.In post 1525, Dragon of the West wrote:DGB, can you enlighten me here. We're looking at only 2 posts to go off
From experience, these slots are often scum and get bus'sed because they are a liability to the scum team.
Anyways, looks like you guys are cool with letting Dunn do nothing and get away with it, so have fun with that. I'm VT.
VOTE: Dunn- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Vroom vroomIn post 1562, Dwlee99 wrote:Bussing is when there is a fast wagon because busses go fast like the wagon fast- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Why would you vig DGB if you want Titus deadIn post 1566, Nero Cain wrote:titus wagon is dead.
Dunn prob ends up being the days lynch and eh fine
im still investigating andre but im changing my vig target to DGB- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
How do you feel about nom's slot now?In post 1627, VFP wrote:I think we just go Titus.
Scum killing Nero show either a threat there or setting up Titus more. However, I don't think they target Nero as a protective PR, meaning that this wasn't a consideration when killing and most likely means Titus is lying.
VOTE: Titus- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
It's possible they thought he was a PR. Or a vig got him and the scum kill was blocked (if Titus is being honest and we extrapolate that to mean there is a babysitter(s))In post 1626, Dwlee99 wrote:
That's what I'm trying to figure out. I guess there were never any universal townreads though.In post 1623, Save The Dragons wrote:why did they kill nero lol - Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West
- Dragon of the West