The trees tremble
An replacement moves in
All remain quiet and stare with anticipation
As the new slot comes in
How is this flailing Grandpa? Do you look at any big text and just say it's flailing?In post 26, GrandpaMo wrote:holy shit, another flailing scum, is mini + val the scum team?In post 25, Val89 wrote:All,
I am so sorry I am so late to the thread - you've all given me so much to think about, so it has taken me a little while to gather my thoughts and process it all.
One advantage of waiting until there has been a bit of back and forth is that one can start to get a sense of how the game is going to go, and start to make some initial reads. Lots to unpack here, so I'll get straight to it.
I don't like this post. Clearly, post 6 is not post 1, and lying to us straight out of the bad is not a good look. In fact, I propose that we should make it a sort of agreement between us that if any of us are caught lying - about anything - we should give strong consideration to eliminating said person as a result. In addition, the whole post - the content, the tone, the context in which it was posted just gives me a general sense of unease. It was a gut read initially, but I think it's clear I was consideringIn post 6, MiniMegabyte wrote:First!MiniMegabyteas at least a slight leanscum here already. Hence far, I have to say the rest of the players are null reads, which considering how advanced the game state is we can start to stop chucking random votes around, this took me a surprise - I was about to say we have some very good mafia players here, but then it occurred to me that if you were truly that skilled you would have convinced me to give you at least a slight townread by now.
Ahh, and here is it; the smoking gun that grants some confidence to that earlier gut read. I am aware of the existence of confirmation bias, so I have gone through all the contributionsIn post 8, MiniMegabyte wrote: (inserts shaking hands emoji here)MiniMegabytehas made very carefully several times to try and guard against that, but no -MiniMegabyteis a strong scum read at this point. Let me explain.
MiniMegabyteis clearly trying to insinuate that she has no personal knowledge ofVFP, particularly as this comes of the back ofVFPsexplicit (and as it turned out - also false) statement that they don't knowanyonein the game. Also of interest is the actual emoji chosen here - a handshake. Between two persons. To the exclusion of the rest of the group. See where I am going with this? She also specifically and pointedly says "Nice to meetya!" instead of "nice to meetyou". We all know English is one of those languages where 'you' can refer to a singular or an individual. Using it here would be natural, avoid the wavy red line most modern day browsers would assign to the word, and give her the benefit of the ambiguity if anyone paying attention catches it. Instead, we get the informal 'ya', standing in contrast to 'y'all', which to me is a further indication the introduction is addressed specifically toVFPand she wants us to know it.
The question now becomes why? In my view, the only explanation that makes any sort of sense is she wants us to think, even if only subconsciously, that this over the top, public performance is the first time these two have ever came in to contact, and they most definitely haveNOTalready said hi to each other in the scum thread. No sir, definitely not! Nothing to see here folks! Shake my hand and smile!
You might think that this makesVFPher scum partner then, and the game is solved. Putting aside my feelings towards how I would feel if my first ever game of Mafia was solved and ended on the first IRL day, I don't actually think this is the case. I thinkMiniMegabyteknew that someone might pick up on the vibes between the two here and our first thought would be that they are scum partners. But equally, perhaps that what they just want us to think? I wish there was some term to describe this, but I've checked the wiki inside out and can't find one, so I have invented one, both to refer to this situation and the approach I think we should take to try and come to some sort of conclusion as to how to deal with it. I call it Written Information Follows Overt Meta (WIFOM) - in other words, when what you see written down is in line with what would be expected from your experience you should assume that it is true. No sane scum player wants to associate themselves so strongly with their scum partner so obviously and early, so when we see it happening, we should assume that ISN'T what is happening, that makes no sense. Thus, this is all a big play, and we can actually rule outVFPas the other scum. As an aside, feel free to use that acronym in your future posts, but do try to remember who invented it and give credit every now and again.
There is the open question as to whyVFPalso lied about their association with other players, but I am going to assume for the moment that was a legitimate mistake - I know what I said about eliminating proven liars, but I don't think they would be so fast to walk it back. In contrast, I thinkMiniMegabytefully expected that "First!" lie to slip under the radar.
So;townread,VFPscumread,b]MiniMegabyteeveryone else[/b]null. I think it's pretty clear given that set of reads where my vote should go. I'm going to put my vote where it obviously belongs, and strongly feel that we should make them the elimination for the day. Obviously there is quite a bit of time left before deadline, and I would like to see some more discussion, but I will put my vote on them and see what happens with the rest of the votes. Being the first, I won't be able to hammer, but I want to make it clear that I would be prepared to hammer, and it will take a lot now to convince me to switch my vote.
With all that said: VOTE: T3
Omg, flailing scum.In post 49, GrandpaMo wrote:i don't know if you were serious at all, but I wasn't in any of the posts I made expect for the VFP townread so far. Let me go ahead and actually analyze. You are the type that is more alignment indicitivate when pressure occurs. So if town never pressures you, you are most likely to get away as scum!Val.In post 27, Val89 wrote:You know,Cookwas the other person you call 'flailing scum' not more than one page ago. Do we collectively think scum would pay so little attention to the game they would forget who they were calling scum from one page to the next? I'm not so sure myself. Slight towncred for this. On the other hand, calling 3 people scum and not putting your vote on any of them seems scummy, so I guess it's still a nullread over all.
It will, however, be interesting to hearalstroemeriainject some thoughts on the implied case you make against them in this post, though - don't think I didn't see it. If you feel that way, you should come straight out and say it, in my opinion.
First; I do not not know why you are taking any of my reads serious lol as "flailing scum" that should have gave you the hint especially when I replied to your post and realized it was just a BS post to make it seem long, with no content providing and voting someone other than your scumread xD, hence why I just said flailing scum as a joke. So please do not townread me nor scumread me for this.
Second; You contradict yourself in the second statement where you say, "On the other hand, calling 3 people scum and not putting your vote on any of them seems scummy, so I guess it's still a nullread over all. " -- I don't know if this was suppose to be a reaction post, but this quote looks bad for you. It was a RVS vote. Calling 3 people scum (technically two, I don't where you got three from), then continue to say it could be more of "null read" it seems like you were trying to manipulate the context into making it how I could be scum for this lol.
Please elaborate more on that because I don't know if you are trying to like get a specific reaction or what -- but if you deep analyze this quote, you can see how it's bad and you should admit that.
Obliged to scumread you for this LAMIST.In post 57, VFP wrote: Thats 3 pages, 3 reads! A read per page!
You don't have to overexplain it, no lims are just bad. Period.In post 77, Zyla wrote:No, no, James is right, No Elims are strictly bad for town in the majority of situations, from everything I've read, they'reonlygood with an even number of players (Such as the day after the JK jails the NK actor or victim, Doc heals the victim, or mafia refrains)
We have 9 players, 7 Town, 2 Mafia. ELo is hit when we have 3/4 Town and 2 Mafia or 2/3 Town and 1 Mafia left.
Assuming that Mafia is able to pull off the NK every night, that means that the possibilities for hitting 3 or 4 town at 2 mafia is limited to NoElim NK, MisElim NK, (4 town) or MisElim NK, MisElim NK (3 Town). If we no-elim, we only haveonechance to get our elimination wrong and still win the game, but if we vote for someone, even at random, we have achanceof hitting scum, still one mis-elim left, and gather information along the way.
tl;drnever vote no Elim unless there's aspecificreason for it
Okidoki boomerIn post 220, GrandpaMo wrote:shh i was memezmerized by Not_Mafia's "flailing scum" I was scum that game and somehow won. so ima use the same tactic to scare scum
No.In post 158, GrandpaMo wrote:Also, I very much dislike how James just left this conversation. This looks bad for you, James.
This is scum seeing T3 towntell and then getting mad because it's a "trust tell".In post 167, Zyla wrote:If I'm not mistaken, the only legal way to take 74 is as a joke, otherwise I think it falls under a trust tell
@Mod, can I get confirmation on if I'm correct with that?
Townie paranoiaIn post 183, alstroemerial wrote:As of right now I'm comfy with my vote on James, but like I alluded to in my earlier post, I wouldn't be surprised if at least one of the two scum was trying to hide right now. When you consider that the four SEs are T3, VFP, Mini, and Cook, I get nervous that they are generally being quiet while the newbies drive so much of the conversation.
Ok, you get one chance to convince me.In post 219, GrandpaMo wrote: anyways, it was suppose to be outta blue for a reason. just because u disagree wit me doesnt mean im scum? thats a fallacy right there. and how can i set up a set up as scum? that would involve 200 iq wifom. it doesnt advantage me if i try to set up alstro because i already sorta townread alstro and i probably think james flips scum here
I didn't ask you.In post 230, Val89 wrote:Is this specifically directed to Grandpa, or would it help if I summarised the case for Scum!James as I see it?
I don't read wallposts.In post 230, Val89 wrote:Is this specifically directed to Grandpa, or would it help if I summarised the case for Scum!James as I see it?
Who said i didn't know? I just didn't read it.In post 236, Val89 wrote:Ahh. That'll explain why you don't already know the case against James then.In post 234, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't read wallposts.
So he says town should tunnel a scummy slot but because he doesn’t keep tunneling slots, that makes him scum?In post 239, Val89 wrote:He thinks being at the forefront is most fun; and that town should pick out someone they think are acting scum and tunnel on to them, keep the pressure up and find the cracks; whilst he implores people to explain and not to hide what they are thinking.
He just doesn't think that hard enough to actually do that this game.
Oh, and apparently he can read Zyla's mind.
If i doze off halfway through reading it it’s an unfun wallpost.In post 241, Val89 wrote:I am afraid he doesn't read walls, Grandpa; but he can apparently decide if they are entertaining or not without having read them.
That's some top tier deductive skills, and I'm waiting with baited breath to see it in action during the game.
Now i’m gonna comment on this since you bring it up like a real gotcha moment every second sentence in your post.In post 240, GrandpaMo wrote:Then boom disappears once again.
Pushing someone for the reasoning of them: "wanting a no lim" looks really bad for you.In post 81, Zyla wrote:VOTE: VFP I don't like the fact that you seem to have chosen no-elims on D1 to be a hill you're willing to die on, nor the fact that you implied that you've won multiple games with a D1 no-elim when I can't find any examples
Town stay inconsistent all the time.In post 247, Val89 wrote:You've established you are a fan of conciseness, and James don't post all that much, but what he does post is consistently inconsistent with his own stated position of how town should/do act.
Ok, newb.In post 249, Val89 wrote: "He's town because he gives no shits about doing this things he says town should do, I'm an SE slot you newb so trust me." I ain't buying that.
You should vote Zyla.In post 249, Val89 wrote: You buy his read on Grandpa as genuine? Zyla is the other one driving that wagon, and I agree she's likely flipping red here too.
I'm not going to go way hard on this particular point as i'm not James's lawyer, but it is my experience that town sometimes change their reads drastically without sharing the exact thought process. And James here went from saying they scumread Val, to saying they scumread you and that they implicitly townread Val. Why would scum!James neglect mentioning their progression? Now town!James might very well have neglected to mention this point as they simply considered that a world in which Grandpa!scum implicitly meant town!Val.In post 253, GrandpaMo wrote:@NEE, do you think that inconsistent where they implicitly townread Val through them scumreading me, comes from town?
Now you're just blatantly misrepping what i said to discredit me.In post 261, Zyla wrote:For the other part, I 100% think that "I'm the SE, so vote how I tell you" is bad form, although I haven't decided yet rather it's scummy, or someone who thinks they're better at this game than they are
First part of 251 was an obvious joke.In post 264, Zyla wrote:I don't know how else this post is supposed to be taken
- Your scummy voting pattern.In post 268, Zyla wrote:Also, don't tell us how to vote, tell uswhyto vote.
To paraphrase you: are you capable of summarizing what you've said about me into one easy to read post?
The change over to Grandpa when seeing no reaction from your "wanting no lim is scummy" vote on VFP.In post 270, Zyla wrote:What makes it scummy?
You don't scumread them but put them to E-2/E-1-actuallyi'mnottoosure ?
An lesson. Anyone that get's put to E-1 in the future because of not doing much solving, don't say things like this.In post 381, VFP wrote:Should I claim I want to die then?
Some of VFP's posts do be making me nervous, not gonna lie.In post 398, Val89 wrote:I am decidedly uneasy about Cook's sudden reappearance, with a vote, just as VFP starts to make themselves look suspicious.
What?In post 401, VFP wrote:You only need to be nervous if scum.In post 399, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Some of VFP's posts do be making me nervous, not gonna lie.In post 398, Val89 wrote:I am decidedly uneasy about Cook's sudden reappearance, with a vote, just as VFP starts to make themselves look suspicious.
That's not at all what you said.In post 405, VFP wrote:Basically, if you're town, no need to be nervous I won't be getting you.In post 402, NorwegianboyEE wrote:What?
That first post sounded accusatory.In post 410, VFP wrote:In post 401, VFP wrote:You only need to be nervous if scum.You okay there?In post 405, VFP wrote:Basically, if you're town, no need to be nervous I won't be getting you.
Who even are you?In post 418, T3 wrote:Norwee comes across as different than the game I played with him and I'm not sure why.
pedit: I saw Cook, someone else who voted on the page who I forgot voted. I wasn't sure whether Zyla had voted.
Can you explain it to us plebeians that are not chummies with you or T3?In post 422, VFP wrote:T3 should know what my gripe with Grampa is here if town.
Pretty much yeah.In post 563, Val89 wrote:Did you get what you were expecting, Norwee?In post 259, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Anyway i will let this point ruminate as i wait to see James's response to all of this.
Why would you hammer yourself?In post 596, GrandpaMo wrote:i would hammer myself -- but someone did that in another open game and everyone got mad at them. so ill just wait a hammer on me.