Mini Theme 2217 | Owner's market blitz | Over
Forum rules
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
WrongIn post 120, Gamma Emerald wrote: I don’t think Alisae explicitly was saying e should be MO. E was basically trying to make sure mechanics were handled right, and I think since Pooky hadn’t checked in e tried to drive the conversation
It wasn't wanting to be marketplace owner that seemed suspicious to me though, it was the argument that the choice should be based on ability rather than towniness.In post 17, Alisae wrote:in a vacuum the only marketplace owners that should even be worth considering is me and pooky as we're probably both the smartest mechanical players when it comes to this setup. Pooky is probably better at bidding than I am and I know this setup like the back of my hand.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
Sure, but that's not what Alisae was saying.
There doesn't seem to be a heap of good reasons for a town player to announce they've spent their full wad. There is a good reason for scum to - to deter town from voting you out.In post 129, cyrus62 wrote:
one trick to this game is asking what one can bid on . me i will be honest , im broke right now but wont say what went where till later on.In post 128, Gamma Emerald wrote:
You only dislike it because we aren’t sheep that will listen to your weak cries for powerIn post 126, cyrus62 wrote:
i think forming reads so quick is nai but i dislike it.In post 124, Mistyx wrote:i think gamma and kyouko are town
VOTE: cyrus62- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
On the powers: these all seem like pretty good powers for us to have or to keep out of scum hands. We can't block them since they have more cash. I think the best way to make sure they pay enough for them is if we all bid for exactly 1, bidding at least 401 for it, but randomly choosing which one to bid for (as in flip a coin twice, or use a 1-4 RNG). With 10 town players, that means there'd be a (3/4)^10 = 6% chance that no one bid for a particular power. So scum won't get any easy picks - if they want one they'll have to bid at least 402 for it, meaning we can outbid that player in future days.
I think that approach makes more sense than bidding for the one we individually decide is most important which could leave others 'easy pickings' for scum.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
Not much if you win your D1 bid, of course, but you get your money back if you're outbid.
If we get all four powers we still have six town players who can bid 400+ for other stuff D2.
I wouldn't recommend this for any mix of powers on D1, but in this case I think it's worth making sure we make these all pricey if scum want to outbid us, and this approach is the best I can see for ensuring we do that.
P-edit: yes, D2 it would not be smart to reveal who does/doesn't have money left.
Also that's why we should all bid 400+ on a random item today, as per my suggested approach, then scum can't gain any advantage by who they kill (beyond the usual factors).- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
Because it's a potentially powerful role for scum in later days, lets them override any protective powers we may have. We shouldn't cough it up for free or low cost.In post 182, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:
Why did you decide to include Hitman amongst the roles we should roll for?In post 173, imaginality wrote:On the powers: these all seem like pretty good powers for us to have or to keep out of scum hands. We can't block them since they have more cash. I think the best way to make sure they pay enough for them is if we all bid for exactly 1, bidding at least 401 for it, but randomly choosing which one to bid for (as in flip a coin twice, or use a 1-4 RNG). With 10 town players, that means there'd be a (3/4)^10 = 6% chance that no one bid for a particular power. So scum won't get any easy picks - if they want one they'll have to bid at least 402 for it, meaning we can outbid that player in future days.
I think that approach makes more sense than bidding for the one we individually decide is most important which could leave others 'easy pickings' for scum.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
Two things:In post 179, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:
Numerically a good approach on days when all the powers are strong but hitman does not warrant 400 for a takeaway if the winning townie will live the day. This reminds me, under no circumstances (except extenuating deadline ones) should we hammer before claims in this game, even D1, as if a townie is going to be misexecuted, and they feel certain of it, they can potentially spend 500 on a scum role (today that is hitman) before they are hammered if they have not bid on anything yet.In post 173, imaginality wrote:On the powers: these all seem like pretty good powers for us to have or to keep out of scum hands. We can't block them since they have more cash. I think the best way to make sure they pay enough for them is if we all bid for exactly 1, bidding at least 401 for it, but randomly choosing which one to bid for (as in flip a coin twice, or use a 1-4 RNG). With 10 town players, that means there'd be a (3/4)^10 = 6% chance that no one bid for a particular power. So scum won't get any easy picks - if they want one they'll have to bid at least 402 for it, meaning we can outbid that player in future days.
I think that approach makes more sense than bidding for the one we individually decide is most important which could leave others 'easy pickings' for scum.
It's also worth pointing out that based on the midday flip it appears that a single townie already bid their 500 dogebux by evenly spreading them amongst the 4 roles so our probability here is likely 8% rather than 6%, and that's only if all town follow the strat.
First, the risk with designating a scum role as 'for the person who's about to be convicted to bid on' is:
- other townies don't bid on it, the convicted person gets quick-hammered, and scum get the role for cheap
- other townies don't bid on it, the convicted person is scum, and other scum get the role for cheap
Second, I agree it's reasonable to assume it was a single person who bid 125 on all four roles... but why do you assume they must be townie?- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
Acutally, I'm going to follow up and VOTE: ssbm_Kyouko for post #179. Between that possible scum slip, and the downplaying of hitman... on which note, also if ssbm_Kyouko expects MO to draw the NK (per post #31) why didn't he suggest MO bid for scum powers like hitman instead of no-bid? I feel like he's scum hoping to pick up hitman for cheap.
And HEAL: imaginality- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
The bolded part assumes we mis-exile. We could exile scum...In post 203, ssbm_Kyouko wrote: 5 hours after what is apparently scum trying to gauge where the town is bidding (whether Cyrus is scum or not, tbh he is the only player in the lobby I would say the 125 split is NAI for with confidence). They see nobody is bidding high yet. 5 hours later, in comes Imaginality to lead town toward spending 400 on all roles. Imagine scum dont bid on anything toDay. Town spends 1600,loses 500, or 100 and a purchased role, then in the likely situation that they avoid hitting the doctor target and get a kill, that's another 500 down.
Even if we grant your assumption, we're 500 (or X and a purchased role) down x2 if scum successfully nightkill regardless of what bidding strategy we implement. It makes no sense not to bid hard - and without a PT the only way we can reliably cover all the PRs (enough to force scum to bid high for them) without scum knowing who to target for their NK is if we each choose randomly.
Hadn't thought of it by then. At first I was wondering if there was a way we could assign people by name to each PR but that gives scum too much information for their NK tonight and subsequent nights.Where was this strategy before midday? We were already very deep into mechanical discussion when he made his previous post, so why not bring it up before midDay?
We get our money back if we're outbid.While his suggestion is appealing at first, even to me, from a numbers standpoint, I think what they are doing is baiting town into spending a lot of their money so that in later days scum can outbid.
I think these roles are worth bidding for.
It's less advantageous to us to get roles on later days - less chance to use them, more chance to be NKed before using them.
Right now if I vote someone other than me as MO I'd lean more towards Cupcake Butterfly.The next bit gets tinfoil, but I would not be surprised to find out flea is the scum's preferred MO candidate and see that Imaginality eventually concedes and switches his vote there as I'm currently leading. Whether his means flea is scum or one of the scum has a friendly relationship with Flea that may lead Flea to elect that scum as a replacement, I do not know.
@Misty re the scumslip: I felt the comment where ssbm assumed the 125 voter was town was suspicious - in that if he is scum (and they aren't the 125 voter(s)), he would know the 125 voter is town. So I feel that apparent assumption could be indicative of hidden knowledge.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
I admit I didn't remember the 'it appears' but I still think your decision to say 'townie' rather than 'player' is questionable. As is your downplaying of hitman in other posts.In post 254, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:In post 253, imaginality wrote:
look i did it and now scum is going let me win all 4 and kill me at night.
Cyrus, whoactuallymade those bids doesn't make a difference to my point thatssbm stating with certainty that town did it(before you started hinting it was you) is suspicious.
Are you sure the bolded is your actual interpretation of my post (snipped below)?
In post 179, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:It's also worth pointing out that based on the midday flip it appears that a single townie already bid their 500 dogebux by evenly spreading them amongst the 4 roles so our probability here is likely 8% rather than 6%, and that's only if all town follow the strat.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
You still don't get that my point is he called you town and I don't see why that betting pattern means you're town.
@Distance: I think ssbm only considering the possibility that the 125-bidder is a townie was a slip scum might make (they know it wasn't scum). Or it could be a deliberate choice of words (if cyrus also scum). I just see it less likely that a townie would assume the bidder was another townie.
Aside from that, I haven't got a lot of other strong reads. Still slightly suspicious of Alisae/Gamma for Alisae pushing to have the MO chosen based on skill rather than towniness. And I feel like there might be a couple of players being pretty quiet so far? Need to reread and check the user list.
Can I assume from the lack of discussion of my 'bid 401+ on random choice' plan that no one sees any issues with it?
If so I hope everyone remembers to bid before the day end (actually before the market closes, 10 mins before the day end). If scum pick up anything from today's market for cheap I'm going to be pretty annoyed.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
A few reads:
I lean town on marcistar, VFP and Cupcake.
Also cyrus and Distance at least appear to be trying to scum hunt in their own ways.
Kitty really needs to post more as do Smoke and Mirrors. There's like only a day left in this Day phase!
If I wasn't voting ssbm, my vote right now would be on mastina (gut) or Gamma for reasons already mentioned about Alisae, plus Gamma tried to minimise it in #120- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
In no way is it excessive spending. Considering at least 6 town players will get our money back, but probably more (if scum outbid us for one or more of the powers). If scum get two, tomorrow we still have six players with their full stack, and two with either their full stack or a PR (depending on how the voting and NK go).- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
I think Cupcake is town, and I think Cupcake is capable of making smart choices about which powers to boost and which replacement to choose. And I wanted to choose someone with at least one vote already to make it more likely they could become a valid alternative to ssbm and Flea in time before day end.In post 302, marcistar wrote:..?
what makes u want cupcake as market owner? (:In post 283, imaginality wrote:I don't want ssbm as MO, I think Cupcake is a better pick than Flea. I'd go for Flea if it's still between Flea or ssbm closer to day end though.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
In the early stage I felt it was bad because if certain players have announced they've spent all their money, it helps direct scum for the night kill (if they want to kill players who more likely still have a full wallet).In post 304, cyrus62 wrote:
basically imagnality started saying i was sus for stateing like i was trying to get town cred for saying i was the one who bided on everything only after . ssbm said i looked like town. but before that he was trying to say i was bad for saying i blow my money already. it cant be both ways. either he isnt reading his own post or hes just making bad pushes.In post 301, Flea The Magician wrote:OK, so I haven't actually voted or pushed based on activity, I generally find activity to be NAI and I like to encourage people to participate.
Show your working for me? Because I am not seeing what you're seeing at all.
I also felt like it could have been an attempt to deter wagons on you i.e. "don't vote for me, I might have a PR".
When I saw the mid day market update and it was clear you must have been the 125 bidder (no bid of 500, and no one calling your claim to have spent all your money as a lie), then I felt like the particular way in which you spent your money wouldn't have had the wagon deterring effect so that lowered my suspicion of you.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
I never thought you were trying to get town cred through your bids though (if I understand that phrase correctly as 'trying to have others read you as town'. My point about that was more that other players might read you as having increased chance of having a PR and therefore riskier to exile all else being equal.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
I'm not sure what your question is but if you're implying our money runs out too early under my approach, I don't think that's true:In post 320, Flea The Magician wrote:
So we have days 2, 3 and 4 to go with the spending, when then?In post 314, imaginality wrote:In no way is it excessive spending. Considering at least 6 town players will get our money back, but probably more (if scum outbid us for one or more of the powers). If scum get two, tomorrow we still have six players with their full stack, and two with either their full stack or a PR (depending on how the voting and NK go).
- we have ten players
- bid are refunded if the bidder doesn't win
- each scum player can only outbid a town player once (if we're bidding 401 or more)
That means we win 7-10 of the PRs over the first three days (depending on scum bidding choices).
This only limits us when we get to day 4 bidding. Worst case (all convictions and NKs are town with PRs) we go into D4 with one town with PR and 3 with either a PR or a full wallet. I don't think that leaves us screwed over in the slightest, especially if our MO makes good choices about what to boost.
Also note that the above analysis assumes we bid high on all roles each day but depending on the roles on offer we can adjust our approach (e.g. If godfather comes up and we know we've already used the cop power, no point bidding for that).- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
I'm not sure why you think I believe the MO has direct control. I have never said that. All I said is that I don't think my plan leaves he in a bad spot for D4 and beyond 'especially if the MO makes good choices about what to boost'.
I play poker, I know good choices don't guarantee good outcomes. And my strategy isn't premised on the MO getting good outcomes, it would just be an additional help. Hence 'especially if' not 'but only if'- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
Why to which? I prefer Cupcake for MO because I feel more confident in my town read on Cupcake than on Flea and as mentioned I see alignment as the main priority for choosing an MO.
If it comes down to a two-horse race I'd prefer Flea over ssbm for MO because I've been leaning scum on ssbm.
Albeit, ssbm's recent posting has come across better to me than the earlier posts.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
If you're thinking of the thing I'm thinking of I think it's not alignement indicativeIn post 160, mastina wrote: I will give free townpoints to the first person who can mention something that went wrong in their role PM tho as that happened to me so if it happened to someone else and they can describe it I am instantly masoning them for the rest of the game.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
I asked because I wanted to know why Distance quoted that post when voting Kitty.
I don't think Kitty's town. Of the people with votes on them in the above vote count, Kitty and ssbm are the only two I lean scum on. I was hoping to get more posts from Kitty (also Distance though they seem to actually be looking for scum). But activity seems slow and deadline isn't far away and I'm at work right now so I'm going to accept my ssbm case isn't winning hearts and minds today, and VOTE: Kitty- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
The good thing about the abilities on the table today is, if town did get cop, there's no godfather around still. Agree the most likely scenario is that Kitty got it though. It would be dumb for scum to fake a guilty any time ahead of do-or-die since a 1 for 1 trade is bad for them. And faking an innocent is risky if either player gets eliminated.
Based on that I think the cop should use their ability tonight (if they haven't used it yet) and claim announcing their result by tomorrow latest. So that scum can't wait til do or die to claim it. And anyone who holds back on claiming it beyond tomorrow is very likely scum.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
In terms of reading buses, I feel like this game could be different from usual because scum have daytalk and because of the fixed day length. There's the possibility of more coordination.
It didn't really seem to me like there was anything much of that sort going on though, which makes me wonder whether at least one of the remaining two scum is a low activity player.
I noticed ssbm attempted to get another wagon going in #397 and #406. I'm not drawing conclusions from that but just noting it. Gamma's 'maybe I'll vote VFP' response to 397 is also something I'm wondering about (were they waiting to see if others would join on that wagon?)- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
The mod said yesterday it's plurality voting assessed at deadline. So I don't think this would be possible.VFP wrote: I also think I self vote at E1 there with hope that lack of bids go through as scum?
imaginality wrote:
the cop should use their ability tonight (if they haven't used it yet) and claim announcing their result by tomorrow latest. So that scum can't wait til do or die to claim it. And anyone who holds back on claiming it beyond tomorrow is very likely scum
Can we explicitly agree to this? I don't want to give scum the chance to fake claim cop on a later day when we can't do a one for one trade. Admittedly I think there's a fair chance Kitty bought it but I'd still like to get people's thoughts on record as to the above plan.
On ssbm_Kyouko, I'd like to stick with my scum read but the 426 vote was a neat bit of logic that seemed pretty pro town. And the mix of powers that came up in the market is pretty good for town. If ssbm is scum, he's smart scum playing the long game.
On the roles today I think we need to bid high for watcher so it costs scum if they want to deny us that role. I can also see auction detective being useful on later days depending what powers come up (I wouldn't waste those shots tonight). I don't personally see gravedigger as particularly useful. It could confirm if doc is dead e.g. if Flea won doc, but on the flip side, there's value in scum not being sure if doc is alive or not. So I'd suggest town players with money to bid bid high among the first three roles.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
I think at least one of the people on the VFP wagon is scum. Because I think scum looking at how D1 went down would want to either start a mis-elim wagon early or get a counter-wagon going before it's too late.
VOTE: Mastina because she talked a lot about her vote but a lot of the logic seemed to contain some "in this scenario I think it's most likely VFP" statements where the reason for thinking it's most likely VFP wasn't really laid out.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
I had this neatly formatted and typed out but lost my post, ffs...
The rationale for the scum double bus theory makes no sense to me. It seems likely scum would get Kitty to high-bid cop when they knew Kitty was about to be elimmed. But deliberately double-bussing Kitty, eh, I doubt it. Losing that 800 is going to hurt scum more than just a normal elim. Of course, the fact it seems particularly bad for scum would also boost the towncred reward if they pull it off. But it doesn't seem like the Kitty wagon was really pushed hard so it was a heck of a laid back double bus if it was one. Like I say I don't see it.In post 617, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:
@Imaginality, still think this is town? Kyuku’s top srs are on the extremely likely pure Kitty wagon. I was going to unvote you but this screams setting up miselims to me.In post 616, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:
Good job, if you’re actually town here and town doesn’t want to lose, they should steer 100% clear of your shitty reads,In post 605, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:There is at least one scum in S&M and Distance, I think they just double bussed though. Triple ISO them with kitty. It seems to me the plan was to steal cop with the dead scum's wallet and save the rest of the money for later auctions when a town MO can no longer "guarantee" that no scum roles make it in. The fewer roles that remain, the less powerful the MO Enhancement becomes and the more likely a random role that benefits scum will slip in. By double bussing d1 they can ride out the game until a good scum power slips through
VOTE: S&M
If this is green I will reconsider Distance.
That said, I also don't think we should simply assume anyone in particular on the Kitty wagon is definitely town. A few people have done so so far: Gamma, Distance, you (S&M), and mastina:
quote="Gamma 440"]I think S&M hydra is probably confirmed town now right?[/quote]Distance 452 wrote:i should be obvtown after that flip
(plus the 'extremely likely pure wagon' comment above)S&M 475 wrote:I think Kitty wagon was all town and Mastina was obviously right on Flea, so this game should probably not be too hard to solve.
I think if there is scum on Kitty wagon it's least likely Gamma as I think scum bussing earlier in the wagon is more likely than late. I would reconsider that if VFP is scum (as that would mean there wasn't any chance of shifting the elimination away from scum).mastina 483 wrote:
So I am treating y'all as conftown.In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=12846949#p12846949]post 430[/url], Gypyx wrote:KittyTacky (4) - Distance, Smoke and Mirrors, Imaginality, Gamma Emerald
But with scum really unable to afford another elim today and how strongly the VFP wagon built I think VFP is more likely town and that at least one scum is on the wagon.
Current VFP voters are:
VFP (5) - Mastina - Distance - marcistar - Cyrus62 - ssbm_Kyouko
Of those voters:
With ssbm I feel like I have a good sense of what I find suspicious and what I find townie, and I'm happy to watch and wait.
I'm happy to keep my vote on mastina for kicking off the VFP wagon (which given there had been votes on VFP end of D1, was quite likely to build up), and if mastina flips scum I think it's worth looking at the Kitty wagon again.
cyrus seems all over the place. I don't think that's an act. I feel like unless scum aren't bothering to talk, cyrus as scum would have slightly more of a clue about certain things?
I need to reread marci but retyping all this means it's 2am now, so sleep first, iso after. Pedit: would marci have unvoted if there was a competing wagon? If VFP gets elimmed and flips town that unvote will look convenient in retrospect.
I think if someone did bus Kitty it's more likely Distance than S&M. Their 'i should be obvtown' quote raises my eyebrow (too concerned with how others see them?) and the vote on VFP is unexplained but that could be a play style thing.
I will say I find the meta discussion hard to get into because I don't know anyone from other games and have no time to read dozens of games. The point someone made about Alisae being excited to play when scum made me feel slightly better about Gamma.
Also, why were all the midday bids so low. Come on people, bid high and make scum either give us powers or use their cash. If everyone bids high then it also helps auction detectives (if their target didn't bid today it means they either won a power d1 or are scum saving their cash). Scum can't outbid us for both auction detectives and watcher if we bid high on all three.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
Something bothersIn post 677, Gamma Emerald wrote:Something bothers me about that imaginality wallmeabout that wall! Sorry about the broken quote, cyrus.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
Reposting in a tidied up easier to quote form:
---
I had this neatly formatted and typed out but lost my post, ffs...
The rationale for the scum double bus theory makes no sense to me. It seems likely scum would get Kitty to high-bid cop when they knew Kitty was about to be elimmed. But deliberately double-bussing Kitty, eh, I doubt it. Losing that 800 is going to hurt scum more than just a normal elim. Of course, the fact it seems particularly bad for scum would also boost the towncred reward if they pull it off. But it doesn't seem like the Kitty wagon was really pushed hard so it was a heck of a laid back double bus if it was one. Like I say I don't see it.In post 617, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:
@Imaginality, still think this is town? Kyuku’s top srs are on the extremely likely pure Kitty wagon. I was going to unvote you but this screams setting up miselims to me.In post 616, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:
Good job, if you’re actually town here and town doesn’t want to lose, they should steer 100% clear of your shitty reads,In post 605, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:There is at least one scum in S&M and Distance, I think they just double bussed though. Triple ISO them with kitty. It seems to me the plan was to steal cop with the dead scum's wallet and save the rest of the money for later auctions when a town MO can no longer "guarantee" that no scum roles make it in. The fewer roles that remain, the less powerful the MO Enhancement becomes and the more likely a random role that benefits scum will slip in. By double bussing d1 they can ride out the game until a good scum power slips through
VOTE: S&M
If this is green I will reconsider Distance.
That said, I also don't think we should simply assume anyone in particular on the Kitty wagon is definitely town. A few people have done so so far: Gamma, Distance, you (S&M), and mastina:
Gamma 440 wrote:I think S&M hydra is probably confirmed town now right?Distance 452 wrote:i should be obvtown after that flip
(plus the 'extremely likely pure wagon' comment above)S&M 475 wrote:I think Kitty wagon was all town and Mastina was obviously right on Flea, so this game should probably not be too hard to solve.
I think if there is scum on Kitty wagon it's least likely Gamma as I think scum bussing earlier in the wagon is more likely than late. I would reconsider that if VFP is scum (as that would mean there wasn't any chance of shifting the elimination away from scum).mastina 483 wrote:
So I am treating y'all as conftown.In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=12846949#p12846949]post 430[/url], Gypyx wrote:KittyTacky (4) - Distance, Smoke and Mirrors, Imaginality, Gamma Emerald
But with scum really unable to afford another elim today and how strongly the VFP wagon built I think VFP is more likely town and that at least one scum is on the wagon.
Current VFP voters are:
VFP (5) - Mastina - Distance - marcistar - Cyrus62 - ssbm_Kyouko
Of those voters:
With ssbm I feel like I have a good sense of what I find suspicious and what I find townie, and I'm happy to watch and wait.
I'm happy to keep my vote on mastina for kicking off the VFP wagon (which given there had been votes on VFP end of D1, was quite likely to build up), and if mastina flips scum I think it's worth looking at the Kitty wagon again.
cyrus seems all over the place. I don't think that's an act. I feel like unless scum aren't bothering to talk, cyrus as scum would have slightly more of a clue about certain things?
I need to reread marci but retyping all this means it's 2am now, so sleep first, iso after. Pedit: would marci have unvoted if there was a competing wagon? If VFP gets elimmed and flips town that unvote will look convenient in retrospect.
I think if someone did bus Kitty it's more likely Distance than S&M. Their 'i should be obvtown' quote raises my eyebrow (too concerned with how others see them?) and the vote on VFP is unexplained but that could be a play style thing.
I will say I find the meta discussion hard to get into because I don't know anyone from other games and have no time to read dozens of games. The point someone made about Alisae being excited to play when scum made me feel slightly better about Gamma.
Also, why were all the midday bids so low. Come on people, bid high and make scum either give us powers or use their cash. If everyone bids high then it also helps auction detectives (if their target didn't bid today it means they either won a power d1 or are scum saving their cash). Scum can't outbid us for both auction detectives and watcher if we bid high on all three.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
On SS:
SS town read VFP today, when VFP was already at 4 votes. But SS hasn't done anything to try to deter that wagon or start an alternative. I can see that town read as coming from scum who would know VFP will flip town but not want to prevent the mis-elim.
If SS turns out to be scum I think it extremely likely VFP is town.
Agree that we need to hear more from SS about scum reads. This close to deadline (unless deadline gets extended) everyone should have a vote onsomeone, so we can do decent analysis in later days.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
@Gamma Emerald
@Smoke and Mirrors
@cyrus62
@marcistar
@ssbm_Kyouko
Unless I've missed a post, none of you are currently voting.
Someone is going to get eliminated in less than a day (barring an extension or explicit no-elim votes getting plurality)
Currently there are by my count 3 votes on VFP, 2 on Something_Smart, and 1 on mastina.
1. Who do you want to see eliminated out of those three?
2. Vote for that person before end of day
If your answer to 1 is "someone else", vote for that person.
If your answer to 1 is "don't elim anyone today", vote for No Execute.
If you don't vote for someone else (or no execute) I shall assume tomorrow you're happy with VFP being eliminated.
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
@ssbm I noticed Flea's comment but I didn't assume it meant he was definitely bidding cop, I took it more as "Nancy got burned by my cop play in another game so I expect she, if scum, will bid high for cop to make sure I don't get it if I do bid for it."
Two immediate thoughts.
1. Mastina didn't cover "scum are trying to coin hunt" in the breakdown of possibilities for why Flea was killed. @Mastina does #705 change your analysis?
2. We shouldn't assume doc is town, it's quite possible it could be scum or even that Kitty got both roles (550 cop, 250 doc)- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
In post 718, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:Idk if fae was referring to Pooky or someone else but it definitely couldn’t have possibly involved me.
Flea has never ever played with scum!me.
If the quote didn't apply to you then why would you avoid killing Flea because of Flea saying that?In post 719, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:I would also like to point out Sherlock, assuming you are actually town here and capable of logical thought, that in no freaking world would scum!me be dumb enough to kill Flea after seeing that quote. I’m not scum but I’m so fed up with your ridiculous inability to see an blatantly obvious town ISO when you see it, I’m not sure I even care about parsing you if you’re going to be this bad.
Given you can simply point out you haven't played as scum with Flea?- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
I get a strong impression S&M is only going hard out against ssbm and me from feeling threatened by ssbm's suspicion of them and my questioning a couple of their points. It feels quite omgussy.
Regardless as I mentioned earlier I think it's too early to be voting for them. I don't regard the Kitty wagon as locktown but there are better options for the elim today.
@mod can we have a vote count?
I agree it's binary in that sense.In post 737, mastina wrote:
coin hunting in this game IS PR hunting--either someone has 500 g or they have a role, those are the only possibilities for town.In post 708, imaginality wrote:1. Mastina didn't cover "scum are trying to coin hunt" in the breakdown of possibilities for why Flea was killed. @Mastina does #705 change your analysis?
You didn't consider the possibility Flea was eliminated fornothaving a power role though, and who'd be likely to do that. You only raised it from the angle that scum might have targeted Flea because they thought Flea had a power role.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
@ssbm re. #605: that post begins: "There is at least one scum in S&M and Distance."
If you believed that then, if S&M flips green why would you reconsider Distance if you're sure one of the two is scum and you (as per that post) believe both are scum?
Compared to if you had said just "S&M and Distance are double bussing" where a green flip means a definite need to reconsider.
Seems to me like that first line might be the cause of S&M's view that you're looking to chain mis-elims. So I don't think they're misrepping that post as wildly as you think they are.
Something_Smart is a good choice for today's elimination. I like your theory about the "that's gonna be my excuse" post.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
I've seen several people mention quick hammering (or quockhammering ) but I don't think scumIn post 799, Cupcake Butterfly wrote:
This reinforces the idea that at least 1 scum is a deepwolf, but i think another resides on VFP wagon. This assumes that the ganeatate points to VFP town which I think is plausible. I feel like if scum could've quockhammered a townie, they wouldn't because thwy would knowingly get turbo limmed with deadlines this short and votes coming down to "3? You're dead."canquick hammer under this rule set can they (except when it's already very close to deadline)? Like, if VFP got that extra vote when VFP was E-1 early this game day, we'd still carry on to end of market day and people could leave that wagon, and in theory it could even end up with someone else being eliminated.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
In post 276, VFP wrote:Weekend stuff.
UNVOTE: Gamma
Kitty may be scum for multiple reasons. I'll think when I'm on.In post 456, VFP wrote:I'm also happy to put everyone on the Kitty wagon as town.
Scum looked dis organised or just absent to not move over to me or even try else where.
I think VFP is highly likely town.In post 807, Cupcake Butterfly wrote:
Then I'm very interested to hear on what you think VFP's alignment is, and how the wagon might have influenced that read, alongside how it helps you read his wagoners.imaginality wrote:
I've seen several people mention quick hammering (or quockhammering ) but I don't think scumIn post 799, Cupcake Butterfly wrote:
This reinforces the idea that at least 1 scum is a deepwolf, but i think another resides on VFP wagon. This assumes that the ganeatate points to VFP town which I think is plausible. I feel like if scum could've quockhammered a townie, they wouldn't because thwy would knowingly get turbo limmed with deadlines this short and votes coming down to "3? You're dead."canquick hammer under this rule set can they (except when it's already very close to deadline)? Like, if VFP got that extra vote when VFP was E-1 early this game day, we'd still carry on to end of market day and people could leave that wagon, and in theory it could even end up with someone else being eliminated.
Partly that's a read based on posting (activity a bit inconsistent but seems to be actively trying to solve things/raise questions, also I don't think scum unvote at the end of D1 rather than bus Kitty or try to get a different wagon in place).
Partly it's because of the D2 wagon - I feel like scum who reflected on how D1 went down would want to get a wagon on town going early on D2 because I really don't think they want to risk a second scum elim. So when the wagon grew quickly on VFP it led me to feel more confident in my town read.
Also I feel like VFP reacted reasonably to the wagon, still analysing others and asking a few decent questions rather than just self-defense or omgussy posting.
Will comment on the wagoners in my next post.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
The VFP wagon today:
1. post 483, mastina votes VFP for no reason: "If I had to take a blind guess of blind guesses, it'd be VFP + Cupcake Butterfly but I've got literally zero logic for this."
2. post 522 mastina invents some logic which conveniently turns out to justify staying on VFP
3.post 524, Smoke and Mirrors agrees with mastina and adds VFP's pseudo-vote on Misty as another reason
4.post 532, Smoke and Mirrors unvotes to look at CB
5.post 537, Distance votes VFP, no reason given
6.post 542, Smoke and Mirrors votes VFP again for the pseudo-vote on Misty
7.post 545, marcistar votes VFP and says if she were scum VFP would be dead
8.post 546, cyrus62 votes VFP wondering what the flip would mean
9.post 565, Smoke and Mirrors unvotes VFP because ssbm swung from pushing VFP D1 to not D2
10.post 671, marcistar unvotes because of being busy
11.post 679, cyrus62 quotes Cupcake's pro VFP post and says "no one should vote till we do reads better"
1 looks bad to me because it's not D1, there were votes on VFP D1 so claiming to vote VFP for no reason is lazy. Maybe too obviously bad? Add in that 2 seems like biased logic at best, and you can I hope see why I didn't like this from mastina. I have recognised that out of game stuff makes it difficult to push more on mastina today though so I'm parking this til D3, we have time
3,4,6,9 in the context of S&M's other posts seem like reasonably legit scum hunting
5,7,8 are all unimpressive votes from Distance, marci and cyrus, and cyrus's unvote 11 seems like sheeping marci's unvote 10
Distance parking on VFP and going awol is also a bad look.
Overall I don't think anyone on the VFP wagon has covered themselves in glory. Like even if VFP flipped scum this is not awesome scum hunting.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
If we take cyrus being around at deadline as scum-indicative that means they definitely decided to bus Kitty, yes? I don't think I'm ready to sign onto that yet. Whereas Misty was awol and I think D1 was more a case of awol scum than deliberately bussing scum.
I don't have a super strong scum read on you, but I prefer it to ssbm or VFP. As mentioned mastina is higher in my scum reads.In post 838, Something_Smart wrote:Also hi imaginality
Can you talk about why you scumread my slot? I feel like you really haven't done that much, at least that I have seen
One factor why I lean scum on you is this:
Another is Misty's posts about not bothering to scum hunt because this can be solved by PoE.In post 682, imaginality wrote:On SS:
SS town read VFP today, when VFP was already at 4 votes. But SS hasn't done anything to try to deter that wagon or start an alternative. I can see that town read as coming from scum who would know VFP will flip town but not want to prevent the mis-elim.
Another is Misty didn't seem to be doing much at end of day D1 and I feel like active scum would have more likely saved Kitty than bussed. So therefore I'm more inclined to scum read players who weren't doing much near deadline.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
look i did it and now scum is going let me win all 4 and kill me at night.[/quote]In post 900, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:
I don’t understand what he’s thinking. Why publicly out any of this? He’s acting like he’s buying up prs and simultaneously trying to get Nk’d which completely defeats the purpose of doing so. I just don’t find this makes a whole lot of sense because any invest role is useless if you get NK’d. This could also possibly be lamisty. Either way, it looked like he was just throwing votes around without really putting too much thought into any of them.[/quote]
I doubt the cyrus scum reads because:
- it means scum cyrus didn't try to get on the Kitty wagon despite being active day end
- it means the above quoted post from cyrus, and similar ones, are acting rather than genuine and I don't get that sense; I think confusion is hard to fake and I think he'd be less confused about stuff if he was scum
@cyrusif you're online, and town, and you haven't yet bid all your money, don't bid any more unless you're no longer the likeliest to be elimmed - if you're town and get elimmed it's better for us if you don't take any powers down with you- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
Something about the tone of this post rings a little off to me. Will think on it overnight.In post 908, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:@Imaginality, I wanted to save bleeding obvtown!SS and I didn’t know who else to vote. So if you have a better idea we can get 4 votes on or maybe 5, I’ll switch.
With the mix of reads I don't think we can get another wagon to 4 or 5 before the day ends. But if you want to come and VOTE: mastina with me feel free...- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
13 posts in a row?
I'm not going to be able to keep up on quantity with you today, that's just nuts.
Here's some brief responses:
The comment you bolded and 'dafuq'ed was simply me observing that there wasn't much solid reasoning in the VFP wagon votes so as I saw it, if VFP flipped town the wagoners would be right more by chance than by brilliant deduction.
Your theory that Flea's comment gives me reason to kill Flea is hypocritical when you argued Flea's comment to Nancy wasn't a reason for you to kill Flea.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
Oops, clicked submit too soon.
Re. my posts and my bid, I encouraged town to bid high because I want us to keep scum from getting powers that are useful to us and I think getting powers early is better than late. The reason I bid 90 should be obvious.
I find the fact scum didn't hide any of the bids yesterday interesting. Makes me wonder if they bid 500 on watcher early in an attempt to appear town when they claim it later. On the flip side if town got watcher it would be one reason for the relatively unexpected Distance NK - avoid being watched.- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
-
imaginality Restricted Townie
- imaginality
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality
- imaginality