I'm not sure about this one. Without giving any spoilers, its odd. Every clock in the game should read exactly 3:33 except for one person's. What does that even mean?
VOTE: Xlos
Do I know you?? Introduce yourself at once!
I'm not sure about this one. Without giving any spoilers, its odd. Every clock in the game should read exactly 3:33 except for one person's. What does that even mean?
When my brain is working I should be good at it (I studied civil engineering, although I never actually worked in the field).In post 35, DrippingGoofball wrote:I would like everyone to detail their relationship with math, your answers will be considered alignment-indicative.
Best answer!In post 39, Titus wrote:He's my brother. I claim post 314.In post 35, DrippingGoofball wrote:I would like everyone to detail their relationship with math, your answers will be considered alignment-indicative.
Did the mod include a JESTER???In post 59, Jake The Wolfie wrote:All the cool people are doing it, even me!
Liar. I didn't send you anything.In post 68, Toogeloo wrote:I'd argue that my role pm seems to be more of a law than a thing from somewhere.
Really?? OK.. I am a type of Modified Rolecop. Now I'm confirmed town. Thank you.In post 69, T3 wrote:By the way, anyone who claims a type of Modified Rolecop is confirmed town. This information I have from somewhere that I will not elaborate on furter.
Explain??In post 74, DrippingGoofball wrote:Ah... a scum claim on page 3!
I may have misunderstood; but I thought it was a theory. I did get bad vibes from it though, but -as I couldn't explain it- I didn't comment.In post 76, DrippingGoofball wrote:Xlos doesn't know that because he doesn't have a green role PMIn post 66, Toogeloo wrote:My Role PM doesn't mention a location, but to be fair, I didn't understand half of what my PM was saying.
Is this the post you're talking about?In post 26, nomnomnom wrote:by the way if we could end days with a prime number of pages that would be very great thank you
In fact, he still is indeed.In post 112, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Nope, but MeMe is.
Oh, Shucks!
I don't think this is true, but IF that's the case then you should know the reason without me explaining it.In post 127, nomnomnom wrote:You're feeling pretty different this game monkey. Way less cheery than I've seen you in other games, what happen?
Bingo! I'm not too proud of my reads of late, and I've lost more games than I should have.In post 131, nomnomnom wrote:eh, maybe it's the monkey butt avatar
Where did you get "random"? Cuz I specified the first 3 posters. Unless you're saying people post at random.In post 132, MURDERCAT wrote:Any random group of 3 players is more likely than not to have at least one scumIn post 128, Almost50 wrote:("First three posters of any given game contain 1 scum 80% of the time" rule)
And I'm saying it is meaningful in my experience. Like, if I picked the 3 at the top of the list (now THAT is random) it'd have the "normal" odds of 3/13 for each slot. First 3 posters has a higher hit rate because there's almost always one scum that wants to start strong, one that is late tot the party and one that is a lurksack and likely to flake.In post 135, MURDERCAT wrote:I'm saying that that rule isn't likely to be meaningful compared to picking any 3 players at random
More votes here. please. I promised myself if you did NOT bring up OMGUS that I'd reconsider, but your reaction here is Scum 101. (Town would have backed off once they realized why I put Umlaut on the list by mistake)In post 141, MURDERCAT wrote:lol he's the one who omgused me
In post 128, Almost50 wrote:Oh, Shucks!
Replace Umlaut with Wheme then ("First three posters of any given game contain 1 scum 80% of the time" rule)
Also, MC voting me for this implies she is the Scum of the 3.
VOTE: Murdercat
?? These were ALL the games I played this year. My alignment shows in every game.In post 154, MURDERCAT wrote:Can you quote town games where you invoked the rule?
You do realize that a mean of "a whole one" is a lot more than the mean on "any random 3 players" (which is 0.692). Right?In post 160, MURDERCAT wrote:Also I'm not saying your rule doesn't work, I'm saying it works with any 3 players and isn't useful for that reason
https://forum.mafiascum.net/search.php? ... &sr=topicsIn post 176, Jake The Wolfie wrote:How can we trust that this data is not cherry picked?In post 153, Almost50 wrote:Breakdown:
3 No Scum in 1st 3 posters
7 1 Scum in 1st 3 posters
3 2 Scums in 1st 3 posters
Average: Exactly 1 Scum in 1st 3 posters
Anyone intending to hammer should state intent and ask for a claim I guess?In post 168, MURDERCAT wrote:It is now!
I will do the math in a bit, but it's mostly academic and not really game relevant
NO, but he'd be pissed enough to throw out some fumes, not just a one-line comment and disappear.In post 217, Jake The Wolfie wrote:A50, do you think MC would freak out if they were town who knew they weren't hammered?
I will let others decide if you didIn post 225, MURDERCAT wrote:You didn't respond to me disproving your whole theory by the way
I did say this, yes.. but did you do it?? You handpicked some examples. That's what you did. You're not even a player in the bottom 2 games (I only checked top and bottom and when I didn't find your name in the latter I checked the one above it),In post 239, MURDERCAT wrote:You say this, I do it, and now you don't want to engage about it?In post 190, Almost50 wrote:If you want to argue against the rule; do a research on your own games and come back to me with something like "Well, here are my last 7 games and scum posted in the 1st 3 in only 2 of them"
Exactly is much more likely in a 13-players list. 2 becomes slightly more probable in larges (and especially so in Multi-Ball)In post 240, Jake The Wolfie wrote:A50, is your hypothesis that the 1st 3 posters contain exactly, or at least 1 scum?
All cool and dandy, but:In post 243, MURDERCAT wrote:I went to the completed open games page and opened all of them on the first page and took every game with 13 players with 3 mafia.
There were a couple that had to be removed for e.g. being abandoned and not easily being able to tell who the scum are but other than that there was no cherry picking at all.
In post 294, DrippingGoofball wrote:It's still early but Jake and MURDERCAT give off good vibrations.
In post 33, Flea The Magician wrote:My mathmatical skill is comparible to orks.
One... One... More... more... many... lots... chaingun.
VOTE: MURDERCAT
Edit: Vote modified to be read properly by the automated VCer.
~Ircher
In post 38, Flea The Magician wrote:I have a City and Guilds Level 2 Adult Educations in Maths
Equivalent to a General Certificate of Secondary Education at Grade C
In post 42, Flea The Magician wrote:Titus can be locktown just for thatIn post 39, Titus wrote:He's my brother. I claim post 314.In post 35, DrippingGoofball wrote:I would like everyone to detail their relationship with math, your answers will be considered alignment-indicative.
In post 50, Flea The Magician wrote:how awful it would be if I just stole it..
In post 142, Flea The Magician wrote:I have absolutely no clue where I'm from in this imaginary Math Land
I don't like this ISO. It feels void of anything meaty, and "assuming" MC is ton the vote on him was opportunistic.In post 143, Flea The Magician wrote:Ya'll are doing too much Mathy stuff for me.
I do know how to make 2+2=5 though :3
Add this game to your list on coincidences if you will.In post 300, T3 wrote:There's really only two explanations for the first 3 posters thing. Either it's a coincidence, or cherry picked data.
I'll help yaIn post 465, Jake The Wolfie wrote:VOTE: Jake The Wolfie
Good evening, everyone. *Yelling up at Ircher* and happy birthday to you!