Newbie 2071: The Sandwich Debate - End!
Forum rules
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
i had followed this game loosely, i am aware of the current situation (clasko cleared cop with a guilty on T3)
was reasonably confident in my read of VFP being town, took the slot, was happy to see i was correct
luckily, as we already have information at our feet, i don't have to read the whole game linearly, i can just put on a clinic for the newbies on how to partner hunt with confirmed scum, which is good because i work way better with flips
i will say up front that i think hockeyfan is very very likely T3's teammate based on a quick search i did at work, will get into the full analysis later when i have timefree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
lol i wouldn't have jumped into this game if i didn't think this slot was town
understand why you scumread this slot but think your reasoning is a little bit off, might spend a little time on that, am perfectly willing to make a bet the game wager on my one scumread being correct if there's any fear i might wriggle freefree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
bluntly, he wasn't trying to look town, the aggression and lack of explaining anything isn't going to play well in a newbie game, from a little vbit of seeing him as scum in newbies he's more cautious and tries to make himself more presentable. here he just barreling ahead without actually trying to look good with his posts.In post 992, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I'm also in a position where I'm not 100% certain I want to bet the farm on T3+Hockey/VFP and lock it down? I feel good about my GPM read and okay about my Looker read but I wanted to re-engage with Clasko before solidifying.
i also think he doesn't approach the game as scum by hardshoving his partner all of day 1 only to switch off at the last minute - he might distance, but i didn't think in a 9P he'd make his partner the main wagon he as trying to push for a majority of day 1.
of course this was largely gleaned from ISO and i did not have full context, but it was enough for me to get the read right
perfectly understandable, which is why i'm saying i'm willing to get the game down to one read and bet on it, because i think i'm way more likely to talk my way out of an elimination in f3 than hockeyfan and from a town pov that should be a concern. same as how if i had doubts on you i'd absolutely have to get that aired out on day 3 because day 4 would be too late whether i'm alive or dead. i don't think it's you, but that is mainly because i think hockeyfan just looks like a hit, rather than having any particularly strong reason to clear you as of right now. i actually thought bulge looked scummy in ISO, but i have a bad track record when it comes to reading him, if you're town i consider myself effectively 0/3 lolIn post 992, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:the one concern I have, Peta, is that once Clasko dies I would not be shocked that if I did hockeyfan and hockey flips town, you'd shoot me that night and then it's you v. GPM and Looker. I have no agency there, so it's a question of tomorrow, what's my best winning odds
so I have all those concerns to parse, and that's where my brain is at right now, the more you engage with me about it, the better I think I'll have a sense of it.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
a basic rule of mafia is that you should ignore literally everything done by outed scum, him moving his vote here is meaningless for my alignment either way. nothing t3 does from this point on means a single thing. i think his approach to vfp is lightly anti-partnery, but i'm of course biasedIn post 995, GrandpaMo wrote:I will need to Reeval VFP through this new replacement -- but T3 switching to vote this slot makes it weary for us.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
lol, whoops, i had thought so but in the moment i was like "ok w/e"In post 1008, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:your slot was claimed, Petafree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
In post 1003, GrandpaMo wrote:
More proof that T3 just townread town.In post 386, T3 wrote:Cows in radiating townieness.
for what it's worth, i think this is a valid heuristic, from what i've seen T3 is stupidly bus-happy/tends to TMI players as town (one of the advantages of him overgaming at a rate that even noraa would think is excessive is there's a lot of meta to draw on), and in general most players are afraid to hard townread their partners as scum, but you can't just use single posts for this sort of analysis, you need to loo more at how he was approaching people through the course of the game, whether he was just trying to get a player on his side or if he was putting suspicion on someone but avoiding actually working to eliminate them.In post 1004, GrandpaMo wrote:
Okay I conclude scum between Hockey / VFP.In post 722, T3 wrote:I only flail as scum
Looker doesn't exist.
VFP is a consensus scumread.
LLD is kind of weirdly null.
cows is probably town.
hockey scum.
Grandpa and James I will not disclose.
and saying all that, of course, i still more or less agree with your conclusion anyway, this is just a theory-based point i wanted to put out there.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
Spoiler:
okay, so, this is a massive unsorted quotedump from grandpamo about T3. while the progression here on a surface level is maybe not the best - i think this is probably not the approach grandpamo takes with a teammate, distancing early and pressuring him only to pull a full reversal and go into full-out defense when t3 was potentially a candidate for elimination. most players tend to take the path of least resistance and bus when their teammate is in danger. i also think, in more general terms, the way grandpamo is responding to t3 here looks authentic, for the most part. stuff like 269 and 573 feels tonally good, i lean toward that stuff being genuine.
i think 811 here though is a strong indicator of grandpa-town, though. the fact that t3 crumbed doctor specifically to grandpamo was very likely an attempt to pocket him and get him to stop scumreading t3. while it's super weird that grandpa did not somehow find him claiming vt instead scummy, i just don't think this is an interaction that happens between partners here. it's too specific and odd, and while that kind of thing can be faked, i find it incredibly unlikely they would try to do so in a newbie game, because it isvery unlikelymost players in the game would read into that sort of thing and see it as unaligned. i think it's the simpler answer: T3 didn't want grandpa pushing him, but didn't want to push back, so he fake-crumbed to try to escape the pressure and grandpa got pocketed by it.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
Spoiler:
Now, taking the same approach, looking at this from T3's end...again, the bad underexplained townread he's super insistent on for grandpamo is just far more likely to be on town than on a partner, particularly in response to grandpamo scumreading him early - it looks like an attempt to placate him. the whole nonsense about him fake-crumbing is not the type of distancing i'd expect from partners in a newbie game. i think grandpamo is just town off of t3 interactions.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
In post 403, T3 wrote:
Strange's enterance felt tonally off but other than that fine and cows seems to agree.In post 387, JamesTheNames wrote:
For any other reason than them townreading you?In post 386, T3 wrote:Cows in radiating townieness.In post 603, T3 wrote:Look looker, I know you rolled scum. Please confess?In post 722, T3 wrote:I only flail as scum
Looker doesn't exist.
VFP is a consensus scumread.
LLD is kind of weirdly null.
cows is probably town.
hockey scum.
Grandpa and James I will not disclose.In post 915, T3 wrote:
What can I say?In post 913, HockeyFan wrote:
Ffs, why do I actually like this post from T3. is t3 actually town? What a world.In post 912, T3 wrote: Clasko - Conftown
Grandpa - Townread
Everyone else: everyone else
VFP's switch at the end of yesterday I is towny.
My PoE is Looker, you, and maybe LLD?
But because you're pushing looker you're probably not aligned.so, like, not going to go into as much detail here, because the looker slot is a revolving door, and none of them have had a ton of content to work off of, there's nothing i find particularly telling. in a vacuum, i couldn't tell you what that slot would flip. but T3 coming into the day with that being his primary push has me thinking it's probably a misflip he thought he could get. i'm not super confident on this one.
looker's iso does give me gut town vibes off it, but not really at a bet the game level of strength, don't want to go into detail on what's a very slight read.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
now, i don't know how the bulge plays as scum, haven't seen him do it, don't know what his typical behavior toward partners is. read here obviously wasn't good, but i feel like it's way more overtly buddy-buddy and friendly than i'd expect him to act with a partner in a newbie game? i would expect more caution in that regard, out of fear a newbie sees them as a team because of that.In post 192, T3 wrote:
That's not part of the T3 package.In post 190, JamesTheNames wrote:What has he done that is townie?
this, of course, is slight, because it's only a few posts and otherwise bulge didn't comment much about t3.
In post 179, T3 wrote:Do I let myself get pocketed by bulge and then lose in elo? The answer is, I hope not.In post 221, T3 wrote:James is probably town but I can't say why.
Bulge is a tr. I'll metadive him at some point becauseI'm slightly paranoid.
You're vibes towny.
Everyone else I forgot about or is null.
from t3's side, the early comment toward bulge, followed by the reciprocal townread that seems to be because bulge was townreading him, doesn't really feel partnery, plus he uses the gross fake angleshoot read in defense of bulge - i think that's a read manufactured for the sake of looking town, rather than a meaningful defense of bulge, because he's preventing himself from being able to elaborate on it - that type of read won't likely convince anyone to not vote bulge, but it does try to look like t3 has real thoughts about the game and is contrasting it with a different game.In post 509, T3 wrote:I can't say why bc of ongoing games but IthinkBulge is almost certainly town.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
In post 688, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
I always try and control the game regardless of alignment.In post 687, T3 wrote:VOTE: lld
This feels similar to Yggdrasil when LLD was scum in the sense that she's trying to control the game. I disagree with her James read and she's trying to pocket hockey.
By the way, for the person who was talking about NAI things: This is an example of the proper time to use NAI. When someone is describing a playstyle uniformity.
I'm sure there's some minor differences in how I approach my game control between town and scum but I am also a player who actively changes her meta game to game on purpose so, it's a bit hard to describe I think.
Regardless, this is the proper use for NAI. Controlling a game is not an action done more frequently as scum than town.
Also, I'd call into question how exactly I'm controlling the game when I have yet to place a vote, and am currently catching up. In what way am I controlling a game when I'm not even pushing a wagon yet?
Can you please explain to me? I need to determine your sincerity in making this argument to read you.In post 689, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Like, to be clear, I was eventually going to push to lead from the front because that's how I play, but as of yet I've not done this.
So what is interesting to me is that you've decided to take this line of attack with me despite me having done nothing that could be considered controlling as of yet this game. All I've done is give reads, explain reads and begin a catchup that I have yet to finish.
So your argument is not only fallicious to begin with, wrt to my desire to lead being scum indicative for me, but it's also feeling very fabricated, because there's simply no example of my posting which contains anything controlling as of yet.
So again, I want to be clear: What parts of my posting are similar to Yggdrasil, and in what way are they? And more to that point, what makes those parts contorlling?
lld isn't a player to make a hasty judgment off interactions with scum, but i dunno, response to t3 here feels good, not theatrical at a glance, i'd assume if she got in the game and T3 started bussing unnecessarily she'd tell him to knock that shit off in the scum PT, but maybe...forces less pressure back on t3 here? or if she was questioning him as her partner here, she'd be aiming to make him look more town as a result. doesn't feel that way but that's just a guess. not spending a ton of time on this but wanted to get my thinking out in the open before i moved on.In post 692, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
It's a newbie game, and I don't play them for a reason. The one and only time I played one, I replaced in, called both scum and got shot night 1 after voting out a scum day 1.In post 690, T3 wrote:
This is you outright implying it, and the tone of your posts seems authoritative and weird.In post 664, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Oh boy, time to read the game, find the scum team day 1, lead a scum elimination and get shot at night
let's go
Plus, it's a good vibe to bring into a game.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
so now that i've covered all that ground, i can get into the meat of why i think it's hockeyfan. luckily, his ISO is full of mentions of T3, and i think they look quite bad for him:
Spoiler:
first real meaningful interaction here, hockey pressures T3 for not explaining his read, and T3 gives a very weak explanation of cows' thoughts being "too complex". somehow this mediocre explanation was enough to satisfy hockeyfan and make him suggest T3 is town. this is the kind of thing i find partnery - scum want to interact and look like they're putting pressure on each other, but they don't want to actually go too hard and get their partner eliminated, so they'll ask their teammates questions to seem curious, but not really care about the answers.
Spoiler:
then, when T3 starts getting some early scumreads, hockeyfan starts defending him, questioning why t3 is getting voted, saying he hasn't done anything scummy. it very much looks like he's trying to derail the wagon on t3 here.
Spoiler:
but, suddenly this all shifts, he decides he agrees with james's reasons for scumreading T3 and decides to townread him, and is suddenly attacking cows forhisdefense of t3. this is especially puzzling because suddenly despite claiming t3 hadn't been scummy earlier, suddenly hockeyfan is saying his early posts were scum logs. now, people can change their mind after a reread, of course. but it's kind of surprising to me that he got such a drastically different impression from a reread.
notably, in spite of his apparent agreement with james here, he doesn't really contribute to pressure on t3. instead, we get this exchange:
Spoiler:
that...is an absolutely terrible response from T3, and hockeyfan just sort of lets it slide by. this doesn'tlooklike someone who has T3 as potential scum.
Spoiler:
i bolded inside this reply to clasko for emphasis - he says a lot to chop down clasko's read on T3, saying he's put too much stock into meta, but, again, has hockey actually contributed meaningfully to pressure on T3 in any way? the answer is no. he's more interested in criticizing other people's reads of t3 than doing anything about him himself.
Spoiler:
so, again, a very soft question here, just asking T3 why he's trying to meta-read LLD. T3 gives an answer in 707, but hockey doesn't actually seem to care about it or follow up at all.
left unspoiled, because this is a super scummy quote, imo. hockey is trying to deflect from the scumreads on t3 again here, despite saying his posts were scummy, for some reason he wants to "shift away from it" because...it would be bad if both were eliminated and flipped town? the thinking here makes no sense especially given then he wasn't strongly townreading both players.In post 719, HockeyFan wrote:omg VFP u gonna talk about anything other than t3??
Also regarding this whole VFP/T3 thing thats happneing rn, I think we should shift away a little from it since atm 80% of the players think one of them is scum so if they're both town, uhh we're kinda fucked
of course, in spite of what he just said above, he decides to vote VFP instead of T3, despite seemingly suggesting several times he finds T3 scummy. instead he's voting the guy who was most strongly pushing T3. A vote that just...doesn't make sense if you believe T3 had a decent chance of being scum, which he did. it also reads like more partner defense, attacking someone for focusing on only one slot, when that slot just happens to be outed as scum this game.In post 742, HockeyFan wrote:nvm I think I have to vote one of t3/vfp now that we're close to deadline. I havent got a good read on the ppl that've replaced in, and everyone else hasnt done anythign scummy. i could vote gpa, but I think condemming one of T3/Vfp gets us some info.
Out of the 2, I think VFP is more scummy for only tunneling on T3 basically this entire game
VOTE: VFP
Spoiler:
he wants to seem like he's open to other options here, but he's not actually moving his vote to T3, in spite of suddenly agreeing that his behavior around claiming is scummy. again, remember, he's voting VFP herefor tunneling T3. it makes no sense whatsoever.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
now, suddenly, the only reason he can give for T3-scum is "has not done anything towny"? and that's somehow one of the main elimination targets hockey is ok with voting?In post 836, HockeyFan wrote:
he has not done anythign towny. Also fwiw, the whole T3/VFP thing is only something i am going to pay attention on d1 most likely. I said in 719 that i think town should shift away from it a bit but since no one budged, i got back on it as we got closer to deadline. Stop assuming that I am going to sus ONLY these 2 the whole gmaeIn post 831, VFP wrote:What makes T3 on your radar as scum right now?
the classic scum move: fos your buddy, but push on a townie.In post 869, HockeyFan wrote:okay we have 1 hour til deadline, can the ppl who are voting james vote one of vfp/t3(preferably VFP) cuz that gives us alot more info @clasko, @LLD
now, the reads list here at the start of day 2 feels like a glaring red flag - Hockey apparently scumreads T3, but rather voting him, he votesIn post 884, HockeyFan wrote:Here are just some thoughts for me at start of d2
Grandpa- Honestly dont know how to read this slot. They have super towny logs(428,453,620)(after the tunnel on me but even then that was sorta town but I think this is something they can pull off as mafia so im paranoid of putting them as my top town atm
VFP- once VFP actually started making content, he was pre town. I am pretty hesitant to TR them since their push was *me* and I didnt really like it. This is ofc bias since it was against me, but yea i can put this slot in null/weak town
T3- still have no clue what this guy is doing but I think hes scum(mainly gut). I still think theres 1 scum between T3/VFP and we should have limmed one of them yday
Clakso- Town
LLD- Maybe I was town reading them just cuz they talked confidently, idk
Looker- Have no read
Lets pressure Looker
VOTE: LookerLooker, who he had "no read" on. That makes absolutely no sense from a town perspective. even if someone is lurky and not contributing much, there are other ways to pressure them than with a vote, and here it just looks like he wants an excuse to not actually vote T3 still despite professing to scumread him.
i mean, like...there's no reason he should "like" this post and i have no idea why he would.In post 913, HockeyFan wrote:
Ffs, why do I actually like this post from T3. is t3 actually town? What a world.In post 912, T3 wrote: Clasko - Conftown
Grandpa - Townread
Everyone else: everyone else
VFP's switch at the end of yesterday I is towny.
and yet he knows he's painted himself into it, he can't actually not scumread T3, he just has to make up excuses about how he "seems townier" to keep him alive. the whole thing looks extremely partnery in my view.In post 948, HockeyFan wrote:Looker and T3(This slot has become townier but still within my top 2 scum)free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
thanks, nice to meet youIn post 1030, Clasko wrote:Also, yeah, welcome to the game petapan!free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
Spoiler:
so to start off, you have these early interactions between T3 and hockey, they're kind of playful, not much substance to them, although it's dangerous to read too much ito this sort of thing, some people just can't resist doing awkward little early game dances with their scumbuddies. i'm mainly quoting this here to provide context, though.
after that, he doesn't really mention hockeyfan at all until he drops this naked vote on him. from context, it's not really clear why he was voting hockeyfan here, he never explains it or pushes it all, and later he just hops off to vote VFP in 465. very little actual comment on hockeyfan here.
Spoiler:
this is another post, it's just a flat disagreement with something hockeyfan said, and nothing more. he's not really attacking hockeyfan over it, but also isn't really trying to convince hockeyfan of anything. it's justthere.
Spoiler:
then, later, we get this. hollow response to a question by hockeyfan, another vote, with the only justification being "cows push is a joke". it's not a serious vote. he isn't explaining it in a way that would be convincing to, well, anyone.
this part, in particular, is a red flag for me - him specifically choosing to nitpick LLD's townread on hockeyfan suggests he knows the read is wrong but is using it to attack her rather than pressure hockeyfan at all. this is a certain bad tendency a lot of people have as scum, when their partner is getting townread they'll express some doubt of the read to distance, thinking it'll make them look good.In post 691, T3 wrote:In post 688, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
I always try and control the game regardless of alignment.In post 687, T3 wrote:VOTE: lld
This feels similar to Yggdrasil when LLD was scum in the sense that she's trying to control the game. I disagree with her James read and she's trying to pocket hockey.
By the way, for the person who was talking about NAI things: This is an example of the proper time to use NAI. When someone is describing a playstyle uniformity.
I'm sure there's some minor differences in how I approach my game control between town and scum but I am also a player who actively changes her meta game to game on purpose so, it's a bit hard to describe I think.
Regardless, this is the proper use for NAI. Controlling a game is not an action done more frequently as scum than town.
Also, I'd call into question how exactly I'm controlling the game when I have yet to place a vote, and am currently catching up. In what way am I controlling a game when I'm not even pushing a wagon yet?
Can you please explain to me? I need to determine your sincerity in making this argument to read you.I also don't understand how you could have possibly got a read on Hockey from those first few pages.
UNVOTE: lld
I'll look at your meta.
now, i admittedly don't have the context for this, but at that point in time, my impression was hockeyfan was fairly townread. so what does T3-scum gain from expressing suspicion on a popular townread? i very much doubt he was trying to "widen the POE", as people sometimes say. there were easier targets for him to push, i feel like he would know his chances of getting hockey eliminated were low. and that's why this sort of thing is obvious distancing if you have enough experience to spot it - he'd be too afraid to question the townreads on a player who's actually town, because then he might get blowback for it. i see this kind of thing all the time, it's a major pet peeve of mine because IMO it's just sloppy play.
In post 707, T3 wrote:
1. That's wrong.In post 696, HockeyFan wrote:T3, what are u doing. You are attempting to read someone based off of meta alone. Why not do this wiith some of the other game? Why is LLD an exception?
2. This is a newbie.
3. LLD has a lot of meta I can look at.
we already know t3 is scum, of course, but the fact that he claims to be scumreading hockey but responds in such a safe way feels notable - it doesn't look like he's actually feeling pressured by hockey here. no concern, no worry that the questions he's asking might result in a scumread.In post 722, T3 wrote:I only flail as scum
Looker doesn't exist.
VFP is a consensus scumread.
LLD is kind of weirdly null.
cows is probably town.
hockey scum.
Grandpa and James I will not disclose.
again, a very weak attack on hockeyfan here - there's nothing to this read, just the lightest of suspicion at a time when he knows hockey can't get wagoned.In post 832, T3 wrote:
This was also my thought process, if you're town then it points to Hockey setting up mislims.In post 828, VFP wrote:Are you trying to chain up mis lims?
In post 915, T3 wrote:
What can I say?In post 913, HockeyFan wrote:
Ffs, why do I actually like this post from T3. is t3 actually town? What a world.In post 912, T3 wrote: Clasko - Conftown
Grandpa - Townread
Everyone else: everyone else
VFP's switch at the end of yesterday I is towny.
My PoE is Looker, you, and maybe LLD?
But because you're pushing looker you're probably not aligned.In post 920, T3 wrote:
To me, LLD immediately townreading you feels like pocketing. Then again, it was really obvious so it might be scumbag tring scumbag?In post 916, HockeyFan wrote:
I like it but I feel like we're both wrong on Tr'ing Gpa, but i am confident tring gpa for d2. so yeah we can pre much just lim Looker rn unless he becomes townyIn post 915, T3 wrote:
What can I say?In post 913, HockeyFan wrote:
Ffs, why do I actually like this post from T3. is t3 actually town? What a world.In post 912, T3 wrote: Clasko - Conftown
Grandpa - Townread
Everyone else: everyone else
VFP's switch at the end of yesterday I is towny.
My PoE is Looker, you, and maybe LLD?
But because you're pushing looker you're probably not aligned.
fast forward to today and we have this final set of interactions. i don't have a ton to say here, it looks teamed to me but i'm in pretty deep in my tunnel at this point, his responses to hockeyfan are an awkward "oh yeah you're in my POE" but also "LLD looked like she was pocketing you" which is pretty nonsensical. consistent pattern though, T3 calls hockeyfan scummy a bunch but never seriously attempts to get him eliminated. i think that, coupled with what i assume was the threadstate - not enough people seriously scumreading hockey for him to be a viable elimination - strongly points to this being distancing by T3. (if i'm wrong and more people were scumreading hockey, disregard that, but i still think this is significantly more likely to be a teammate of T3 than anyone else)In post 923, T3 wrote:Honestly I just didn't think of interactions around Hockey.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
so that's about it from me in terms of analyzing the interactions and people's reads around T3. i can possibly do some speculation as to why cows was the NK, and pull meta on T3 to back up how he acts around partners, but other than that i don't feel like i have atonto contribute. i could give the game a full read, but it doesn't feel super necessary at this point because hockey just looks super obviously like T3's partner
other than that, i'm basically treating my stint in this game as a teaching role, so if any of the newbies have questions about my process here or any theory stuff, feel free to ask me anythingfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
hmm, i'm an interesting person to ask on this because my opinion is different from most - i feel like "meta", at least the way most people on the site use it these days, is incredibly lazy and leads to bad reads. people will make statements like "playerIn post 1042, Clasko wrote:I think an immediate burning question I have, and... I don't know if it's the right one to ask, but:
What should newbies do in the presence of the "meta" argument? Like, if player X accuses player Y of being scum due to meta (or if meta is part of the argument), does Player Z (newbie) need to go through Player Y's previous games? Or should they focus solely on the game they're in to determine whether Player Y is scum?
I'm of the opinion it doesn't need to be a factor for newbies until they've shared/read a significant amount of games with Player Y, which would take a longer amount of time than the game they're currently in, but I've seen it being brought up in a lot of recent newbie games, so my thoughts over meta are slightly hazy.xsounds similar to gameAwhere they were town" or "playerxis completely different from gameBwhere they were town" (you can change "town" to "scum" in both of those examples, my usage here was arbitrary), and i think these are both fallacies. a player is going to usually sound similar across games because they arethe same person. unless they're sure there's a clear difference in their play as both alignments, that's no good. but by the same token, a person can behave differently in games for reasons entirely unrelated to their alignment, but just their mood and enthusiasm, or the strength of their reads that game. additionally, if you don't have an idea of the range of someone's scumplay, assuming they are town because they're acting different is dangerous - most people are going to try to change things up if there are several players in the game who have seen them as scum recently.
the argument becomes stronger if the player making the meta case has a strong familiarity with the person, but even then i think people will often be biased toward townreading their friends because of "meta". the thing i would post most stock is if someone is very familiar with a player and is very certain they're scum, because they're playing in a way they wouldn't as town. that type of read tends to be accurate, i think.
anyway, to actually answer your question, properly researching meta takes hours, and most non-crazy people do not have that kind of time. (unless the meta is simply "this person always acts like this", that is relatively quick to check). i think how much stock you put into a meta read in a game just has to depend on how much you trust the person who is giving it in game. in general, though, i would say your read on what is happening in your current game is more important than anything that happened in an old game.
definitely true for me, lmao. i don't have a ton else to addIn post 1043, Looker wrote:I think meta is why a lot of people create alts. Are we waiting for anything else?free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
i meanIn post 1047, Looker wrote:Progress the game? This is why I say this game is subjective - I don't see how beleaguering a point with walls of text (which can be easily misinterpreted and spun to agenda like most things on this site are) is progressing the game any more than stating your sentiments concisely and directly. Not saying I hate walls of text, just saying that most of these "cases" (i.e. HockeyFan saying I haven't tried to progress the game) come down to personality and playstyle differences. You end up with two jobs as town - find the mafia and win a popularity contest.
do you think hockeyfan really believes that or is he making a generic sounding accusation to eliminate youfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
hi
i intend to give this game a full read for the sake of due diligence (although in my looking at ISOs it seems exceptionally dense for a newbie game), but my inclination is still to think that it's hockeyfan because in newbie games typically the surface level reading of the game ends up being the correct onefree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
er, how do you know this? it's correct, but i'm not sure how you'd have a way of knowingIn post 1066, HockeyFan wrote:I know for a fact that they are able to do their mini analysis as either alignment
truthfully, almost nothing i do this game is going to be alignment-indicative, because when i replaced in, one mafia was already outed. the reads i gave were largely the ones i had prior to getting my role, so they'd be "honest" even had i replaced a scum slot. i'm not saying this to create uncertainty around me, i just want the newbies in the game to understand - the only real way to read my slot is going to be through reading the actions of VFP and deciding whether they make sense as coming from mafiafree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
you're allowed to speculate on it but VFP replaced out of all of his games sitewide and this is verifiable fact, so should be taken as non alignment indicativeIn post 1070, Looker wrote:With that being said, am I allowed to question VFP replacing out as soon as T3 was caught? Or how the 1v1 between T3 and VFP didn't move to VFP but instead went to James?free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
i mean, yeaIn post 1073, Looker wrote:Maybe. I just feel it's obvious. I didn't kill James and I hammered T3. Look at the actions of other players - I don't know what more there is to say. I think people just want to post because that's what they find fun about the game.
don't know what you get out of the game tbhfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
just vote there's no need to be such a snarky jerk in a newbie gameIn post 1092, Looker wrote:Are we waiting for prods or can I vote already? I think I have a good guess of who it is. Don't want to end the day early, though, since, apparently, that was a big deal last time.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
i do not like this post!In post 124, HockeyFan wrote:
eh I think its mostly NAI, i think ppl who say they're VT appear as they're town to not get sussed laterIn post 123, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:
seems like you dont want the POE to be shrunkIn post 118, HockeyFan wrote:why do u want to have a Universval tr 5 pages in? Are you trying to get your mafia teamamate Utr'd? Also I dont see the appeal for Tr'ing James, so what makes u TR james?
it would be a good strategy if we were not in newd3 and if i was actually charismatic
neither of which are really the case
post #111 was my reasoning. since you started out in the same community i think, i'm wondering about your two cents on what i saidfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
you're going to have to explain it to me because i don't see itIn post 1090, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Anyone else see the problem with this from Hockey?
I have gone from about 80/20 to 95/5 Hockey being scum from that response. Mostly because I kind of see what the path is for him now.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
if grandpamo made 305 as scum i'll be stunned
i'm working somewhat slowly as i'm busy with other things but having gone through the early part of the game, my views are more or less unchanged from what i got from skimming ISOs and reading for associativesfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
1. i think 313 is sort of a classically scummy response to getting hard pushed by a townie - hockey had been scumreading grandpamo but when mo starts really going after him he tries to suggest they're both town misinterpreting each other and says he wants to end it, it's attempting to artifically cut off the argument because he doesn't have a good way of responding to grandpa.
2. 315/316 just look like classic scum distancing, the fact that t3 ignores hockey and hockey has to point it out in 321 is the sort of thing that happens because one scum player isn't paying that much attention to their partner's posts. 321 doesn't get a response either, but that doesn't really lead to him pressuring t3, seems like hockey didn't care that much about t3 ignoring him after all
i very possibly made this point earlier but it sticks out on review of the threadfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
small snippet but cows was pretty well on the side of VFP being town despite a lot of people not liking his lack of contribution, if anyone still actually believes vfp-scum kills cows n1 for some reasonIn post 518, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:might even say they're not the vote today if you guys keep this upfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
hockeyfan, the game has gone stagnant. there is nothing of importance happening. there is very little discussion taking place. we just just lost 1 of the 2 remaining original players in the game. i asked looker who he thinks is mafia 3 days ago and he has only offered passive-aggressive comments in return (depressingly, i do not think this makes him more likely to be mafia). in order for this game to not succumb to heat death there needs to be movement in the form of votes.
i'm finishing reading up the end of day 1 but this is mostly for myself as i don't think anyone is waiting on any more analysis from mefree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
bad, opportunistic response from hockeyfan where he says he is okay with eliminating grandpamo after supposedly townreading him, then tries to walk it back by saying he "tr'd them so I wouldnt be tunneling them forever" which makes no sense?? why would you townread someone just to stop tunneling them, there's no logical process hereIn post 719, HockeyFan wrote:
I mainly tr'd them so I wouldnt be tunneling them forever. I still think they're null to weak scum but leaning more null rnIn post 712, Clasko wrote:
To each their own. It just jumped out to me as a possibility.In post 678, HockeyFan wrote:Fwiw I didnt think gpas reaction felt that unnatural but a gpa vote is smth I can get behind. Idk if you didnt quite see cows's soft defending of VFP in the last few posts(479,503) Partially 51.
You SR'ed Grandpa at time of argument, in 368 you say you think they're town, now you're fine with a potential vote on them - what's your case for them rn?
bad attempt to divert focus from T3. already pointed this out but bears repeatingIn post 719, HockeyFan wrote:omg VFP u gonna talk about anything other than t3??
Also regarding this whole VFP/T3 thing thats happneing rn, I think we should shift away a little from it since atm 80% of the players think one of them is scum so if they're both town, uhh we're kinda fuckedfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
please don't lie, you've very openly been taking potshots at most of the rest of the game in your posts. it's incredibly disrespectful for a newbie game. i'm not stupid, your intentions are clear.In post 1117, Looker wrote:I wasn't trying to be passive aggressive, I was trying to be direct: at no point did I insult anybody, so at no point did I expect to be insulted. With that being said, I'll allow you to calm down from your AtE so that, when I actually do decide to re-engage this game, it'll be because I want to have fun, not because I'm upset.
also, calling you rude is not an emotional appeal, please learn how words workfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
hell, let's get back to the game - your assessment is that they "softbussed", but VFP had his vote glued to T3 for almost all of day 1 until the james wagon came out of nowhere. they couldn't have been counting on that opportunity coming up, so otherwise this would seem like incredibly poor strategy as scum.In post 1118, Looker wrote:VFP and T3 softbussed until others got involved, then they dogpiled on James - I still find that suspicious.
how is that "soft" compared to, say, hockeyfan's treatment of T3 where he keeps calling him somewhat scummy but finds excuses to vote other people?free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
in some sense i let myself get confirmation biased on hockeyfan, but i'm not really sure i ever would have gotten there on him being town. posts were too weird for me to pick up on the genuineness. maybe should have seen he didn't react like scum being pushed.
as for today, well, i expect things are probably already set in placefree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
it's unfortunate, this is a weird gameIn post 1144, Looker wrote:Also, also, how bad is it that none of the newbies made it to the end of the newbie.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
strictly speaking, the manatee shot is a smart one for anyone - the slot was more townread than any of us, and no one has any idea of what manatee's reads would have been, so her dying leaves a void of informaion. replacements can often turn a game around, killing them is goodIn post 1138, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Peta I'm going to have a really hard time getting away from my hand here.
but I can't imagine you can leave me alive in this situation, Peta.
Like... I have to feel like you have a better shot of killing Looker if you take GPM and Looker in and leave me out. That I am alive currently hits me with issues that
I said that I couldn't see T3+Looker as scum, and I COULD see T3+VFP as an explicit pairing.
So I'm sitting here wondering if that read was just spot on, but I don't know if you'd do some kill ninjitsu.
Cause I feel like you have to know if you vote for me here Peta, that Looker probably votes for you.
Which makes me wonder if you can even DO the fake out required
however, i'm not you, i don't make weird kills to mess with people. i will take whatever is the easiest path to victory, my policy is always to pass hammer to the person most likely to mess it up, and i think i'd have a better chance at swaying manatee than you, although i haven't seen manatee as town so i could be talking out my assfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
so, to pick up the pieces and reassess:
I hadn't really liked Bulge's posts, too much of his reads and reasoning were bizarre to me. LLD, prior to my rep-in, was kind of playing like how i'd set the template for playing scum as an SE in a newbie game - seem helpful and leadery but kind of hands off, let the newbies go in the wrong direction and amplify the bad reads, don't push any wagon hard yourself. also, the james scumread is bizarre to me, feel like most players who have been playing a decent amount of time should have had him as obvious town
i did not post these concerns yesterday because i had convinced myself it was hockeyfan, and so there was no need to say that stuff, because it probably didn't matter
HOWEVER, there was one very specific interaction between bulge and T3 that seemed unlikely to come from partners. i haven't seem bulge as scum, don't know how he plays it, but it's a fairly significant point
as for looker, the slot is mostly a content void, which makes it very hard to judge. he had some posts i thought were okayish, but not a lot else. the fact that two newbies replaced out before him is maybe the worst sign, because i think newbies often flake out when they draw scum and don't know what to post
i think the strongest point in his favor is t3 voting him on day 2 but t3 is also bus-happy and i'm not sure how much that actually works in his favor
mostly right now i want to look back at bulge and strangematter and see if i can find anythingfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
hm, so, interesting - in strangematter's previous newbie games as town, they didn't really struggle to produce content at all, posted plenty, had reads, made votes
granted, replacing in is different, but here they stalled and said they were catching up, asked a few unimportant questions, made a generic statement about lurkers, then vanished. it's a bad look.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
oh, right, i forgot i was technically scum with bulge in nightless exploder pandemonium, but that game obviously is not representative of anything
this is the sequence from the bulge i am looking at:
In post 179, T3 wrote:Do I let myself get pocketed by bulge and then lose in elo? The answer is, I hope not.In post 180, The Bulge wrote:In post 183, The Bulge wrote:serious read thothis would be a very weird interaction between partners. it can be done, but most wouldn't choose to play it that way. the weird playfulness and him bluntly declaring a townread on t3 - it'd be bold, in particular because t3 gets a fair amount of scumreads and is a pretty decent bet to get flipped in any game. i think someone with knowledge of his alignment would be more inclined to see his play as scummy, in particular because his contribution was almost non-existent. i think this is more likely a case of bulge having an incorrect read than him trying to aggressively defend his partner. for reference, i looked at his newbie scumgame from last year, newbie2023, and his play around his partner there was a lot more conventional - slight distancing, some questioning of each other, nothing too weird, fairly safe. this would be a fairly significant deviation from bulge's established scumplay. i think his slot is probably town here based on this
free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
i went to look at some other games even though different setups often mean playing differently around teammates and lol wtf are you doing bulge, you can't bus your entire team in nightlessfree crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
this is kind of an awkward situation
general f3 theory says what gets said on this day is not that important, the main information you should base your decision around is on previous days
but as none of us are the original occupants of our slots in this sham of a game, we can't answer for our predecessors so even our ability to discuss past actions is limited
is there anything either of you want to ask me?free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
In post 1157, Looker wrote:I don't mean to offend anyone, but it doesn't make sense. I'm getting big "my time to shine"/"super sleuth" energy, and I know that's part of the game, but I can't sit here and pretend this is anything other than subjective, self-serving angleshooting when everything is based on opinion or interpretation.In post 1158, Looker wrote:I don't see the point of WIFOMing hypothetical NKs - "I would have..." etc - I don't believe any of it. Saying replacements are scum-indicative is moot because we've all been replaced - the only difference is that your guys' slots weren't filled with newbies. You imply that T3 not voting me would have been distancing, but say that since he did vote me, it's bussing. And then you go looking for shaky play in newbie predecessors, but Strangematter being bored doesn't make him scum.
that's the fucking game, lookerIn post 1159, Looker wrote:And re:being bored, I don't think T3 and Bulge joking within the first few pages in a newbie is alignment-indicative, but I'm willing to concede you believe that, even though your next post is you expressing unfamiliarity with Bulge's play. The whole thing just seems ad hoc.free crypto - petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan