I don't believe that you don't
VOTE: T3
LaL
I don't believe that you don't
Lol.
Fun fact: the short one isIn post 8, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:btw never played Chrono Trigger, I see one of the knights of guardia is like half-sized in the flavor posts, is there a dwarf or something that would explain that?
Not particularly.In post 86, Roden wrote:You're not concerned about a Roleblocker? When I got JoaT in a different game, a RB was also in the mix and completely neutralized me.In post 84, House wrote:Ok, so after some interesting discussion in the PT, I have some cool info to share.
I'm a mason JoaT.
My partner is a mason bodyguard.
The reason I am claiming is because we agree that their flip when I am targeted will confirm me and buy me an extra day, and we expect that I will not be the n1 target as scum typically avoids the "obvious" kill in order to prevent being busted by investigatives or preempted by protectives.
I will not flavor claim until my partner dies, at which point I will claim flavor and the uses of my JoaT shots.
You know me so well.
Ahhh, let him be.In post 107, Angel Warriors wrote:Is there a point in sowing doubt in the claim?
In post 110, Roden wrote:In post 93, Lukewarm wrote:Currently thinking that Roden is town, the unprompted links to scum meta feels townie to meIn post 82, Angel Warriors wrote:Lukewarm do you have thoughts on the game at this point?Oof. I think I just got set up as the first NK.In post 84, House wrote:we expect that I will not be the n1 target as scum typically avoids the "obvious" kill in order to prevent being busted by investigatives or preempted by protectives.
Nope.In post 112, Roden wrote:Wanna clarify further here?
OkIn post 117, Roden wrote:Town has zero motivation not to clarify a read. Thanks for scum claiming, we can get you on Day 2.In post 115, House wrote:Nope.In post 112, Roden wrote:Wanna clarify further here?
112 solidifies my vote, though. That shade on Angel is hideous.
The nervous vibes being put out by Roden would make for a booming bass line.
I can't help that you can't handle already having 2 votes and your sad attempt at shaking them by implying you were nk bait was immediately laughed off.In post 119, Roden wrote:"Nervous vibes on the first IRL day of Day 1 that also will go on for fourteen days" is not a real read or believable thought process.
How does that kind of speculation help town?In post 118, T3 wrote:Or... Angel and House are Masons.
I know he scumreads me.In post 126, Angel Warriors wrote:Ngl I want to elim roden solely because of his play style. I forget what the word for that is rn. brain fart moment.In post 115, House wrote:112 solidifies my vote, though. That shade on Angel is hideous.
The nervous vibes being put out by Roden would make for a booming bass line.
however, his reactions to scum reads is absolute shit and I'm putting that very kindly. lay off a bit and see how he does because I assure you that he is only going to make your scum read on him twenty billion times greater if you dont give him a lot of space.
-nor nor bear bear
Definitely not outside the realm of possibility, given https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=86996In post 135, Roden wrote:???In post 123, House wrote:I can't help that you can't handle already having 2 votes and your sad attempt at shaking them by implying you were nk bait was immediately laughed off.In post 119, Roden wrote:"Nervous vibes on the first IRL day of Day 1 that also will go on for fourteen days" is not a real read or believable thought process.
Toughen up, chief.
What? Lol this can't be a real post. Unless you genuinely believe I'm afraid of getting flash wagon'd 24 hours into Day 1?
If you're that antsy about votes as town, actually rolling scum = 10x worse on the old nerves.In post 138, House wrote:Definitely not outside the realm of possibility, given https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=86996In post 135, Roden wrote:???In post 123, House wrote:I can't help that you can't handle already having 2 votes and your sad attempt at shaking them by implying you were nk bait was immediately laughed off.In post 119, Roden wrote:"Nervous vibes on the first IRL day of Day 1 that also will go on for fourteen days" is not a real read or believable thought process.
Toughen up, chief.
What? Lol this can't be a real post. Unless you genuinely believe I'm afraid of getting flash wagon'd 24 hours into Day 1?
I'm kinda lukewarm on Lukewarm.In post 136, Angel Warriors wrote:I think Lukewarm is scum if anyone wants to debate that with me. I think T3 and roden are scummy but I'm unwilling to look at them much at this point because their play styles are naturally scummy.
-bear nornor
I actually have the slightest of townleans on him, so I'll be interested in hearing more.In post 142, Angel Warriors wrote:lmfao. ok so essentially I feel like lukewarm is scum for like .... nvm I want to wait a bit to reveal my reason. maybe it will evolve into a stronger one along the way also <.<In post 140, House wrote:I'm kinda lukewarm on Lukewarm.In post 136, Angel Warriors wrote:I think Lukewarm is scum if anyone wants to debate that with me. I think T3 and roden are scummy but I'm unwilling to look at them much at this point because their play styles are naturally scummy.
-bear nornor
-detectivenornor
You're not exactly giving me much to work with.In post 147, Roden wrote:I'm honestly super easy to read and consider it one of my bigger weaknesses, but most people just don't bother trying to read me for whatever reason. They just vibe check a random post then park their vote.
EditIn post 149, House wrote:You're not exactly giving me much to work with.In post 147, Roden wrote:I'm honestly super easy to read and consider it one of my bigger weaknesses, but most people just don't bother trying to read me for whatever reason. They just vibe check a random post then park their vote.
Who's scum? All you seem to care about is whining about my vote.
Get over it and scum hunt.
We get it.In post 151, T3 wrote:Would we benefit from a massclaim?
If Roden ever starts trying to actually play the game, perhaps I can get on board with that.In post 153, T3 wrote:T3's page 7 townbloc: T3, Angel, Roden, House.
That's all well and good, but he needs to learn that focusing on defending himself instead of actually trying to find scum isn't going to be a productive tactic, especially when he's in no active danger of being eliminated.In post 156, Angel Warriors wrote:Spoiler:
Look how passive all of this is.
Roden is just town here. He's frustrating people, I understand but town.
-bear beraio
What do you make of 89?In post 158, Roden wrote:Don't complain about my attitude if you're just gonna be rude and complain yourself. I don't know if you're actually town and it would be a bad play to blindly believe your claim.
In post 164, Angel Warriors wrote:interesting. roden is now acting super towny. I'm inclined to go back to SR him again.
-indecisivenornor
I think scum would be more likely to grant an instant townread over a powerful pr claim because they lack the paranoia of not knowing my alignment.In post 167, Roden wrote:NAI but it's an easy town cred post if scum.In post 160, House wrote:What do you make of 89?In post 158, Roden wrote:Don't complain about my attitude if you're just gonna be rude and complain yourself. I don't know if you're actually town and it would be a bad play to blindly believe your claim.
Have you been reading but not contributing?In post 177, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Well I did want to vote luke up until 174, but now we have Noraa Roden and luke town, House off the table but tbh I skimmed him as i was focused on reading roden/nora.In post 136, Angel Warriors wrote:I think Lukewarm is scum if anyone wants to debate that with me. I think T3 and roden are scummy but I'm unwilling to look at them much at this point because their play styles are naturally scummy.
-bear nornor
I think i understand the T3 votes but i dont know yet if I agree with them. I'd rather VOTE: Guillotina right now
Is there any particular reason you're trying to paint a target on Angel?In post 180, T3 wrote:Angel, while probably being mason had a very towny defense of Roden. From looking at the games myself I agree with this assessment so I think Roden is town.
Before 182 I'd have said yes, but... we're cool.In post 183, T3 wrote:Am I supposed to answer this question?In post 181, House wrote:Is there any particular reason you're trying to paint a target on Angel?In post 180, T3 wrote:Angel, while probably being mason had a very towny defense of Roden. From looking at the games myself I agree with this assessment so I think Roden is town.
You should believe in it.In post 185, T3 wrote:The wine is real.
I don't see how any of that is your concern at this point in time.In post 194, Robert M Hunter wrote:I'm interested in the discussion you had that led to this unconventional decision.In post 84, House wrote:Ok, so after some interesting discussion in the PT, I have some cool info to share.
I'm a mason JoaT.
My partner is a mason bodyguard.
The reason I am claiming is because we agree that their flip when I am targeted will confirm me and buy me an extra day, and we expect that I will not be the n1 target as scum typically avoids the "obvious" kill in order to prevent being busted by investigatives or preempted by protectives.
I will not flavor claim until my partner dies, at which point I will claim flavor and the uses of my JoaT shots.
Especially because of a potential roleblocker:
How did the two of you come to think it was a good idea to out a role that begs to be roleblocked?In post 86, Roden wrote:You're not concerned about a Roleblocker? When I got JoaT in a different game, a RB was also in the mix and completely neutralized me.In post 84, House wrote:Ok, so after some interesting discussion in the PT, I have some cool info to share.
I'm a mason JoaT.
My partner is a mason bodyguard.
The reason I am claiming is because we agree that their flip when I am targeted will confirm me and buy me an extra day, and we expect that I will not be the n1 target as scum typically avoids the "obvious" kill in order to prevent being busted by investigatives or preempted by protectives.
I will not flavor claim until my partner dies, at which point I will claim flavor and the uses of my JoaT shots.
From what perspective would you not see that coming?
Not a fan of the rationale on Angel.In post 209, Robert M Hunter wrote:
Renowned Yakra enemy:Robert M Hunter
A++++++ posting would buy again:Roden
Suggests the masons may be fake post 106 (I agree with the sentiment) but then goes on to try to find the masons in #118. These are posts that give me pause but I like the rest.:T3
Seems genuine.:Lukewarm
Healthy enthusiasm, initiative and aggression.:House
Difficult to read, thoughts seem scattered.:Angel Warriors
No posts.:mastina
No posts.:Child of Fairies
No posts.:Marashu
Only posting pictures.:Guillotina
not playing the game yet, just RVS vote followed by unexplained vote, then rules talk and reasons why she won't be present as much as usual.:Titus
this post is everything https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p12913623:ssbm_Kyouko
A whole lot of nothing:Gamma Emerald
Ah.In post 211, Robert M Hunter wrote:Orange is for "neutral" if that wasn't clear.
Meh. RMH is a better vote.In post 297, Gamma Emerald wrote:TRs: AW, House, Roden
decent folks: T3, Lukewarm, mastina
feels like TvS: Guillotina/kyouko
pls post: Marashu, Child of Fairies
SRs: Titus, RMH
VOTE: Titus
fyi none of these areconfidentreads yet
Why the TR on RMH?In post 302, T3 wrote:Reads:
House
Roden
Angel
Guillotina
Gamma
RMH
-- NULL LINE
Child of Fairies/Marashu
Lukewarm/Titus/mastina
ssbm
That happens when I go to work.In post 320, Titus wrote:House - null town (posting fell off)
In post 255, Gamma Emerald wrote:That’s just how House be thoIn post 117, Roden wrote:Town has zero motivation not to clarify a read. Thanks for scum claiming, we can get you on Day 2.
Why is Guillo a better option?In post 352, Robert M Hunter wrote:I'm always the Day 1 yeet, let's try to be original.In post 346, House wrote:Meh. RMH is a better vote.
Bump Lukewarm up & RMH down, and we be vibing.In post 357, mastina wrote:Well may as well, given I've given reads and don't have much to add to them since the game's technically out of the rvs but still feels like it's in the rvs in spite of being out so there's not a lot to have in terms of read progression.In post 355, Robert M Hunter wrote:Can anyone help me get a read on mastina? Her posts read like a personal diary.
Strongly North of Null:
House
Titus
Gamma Emerald
Angel Warriors
T3
North of Null:
Roden
Null:
Lukewarm (above the not-posters)
Marashu
Child of Fairies
Robert M Hunter (below the not-posters)
South of Null:
Guillotina
Strongly South of Null:
ssbm_Kyouko
I've not been able to get anything more refined than this though.
Self-conscious, much?
Squaresoft*In post 374, mastina wrote:Square Enix
So?In post 384, Guillotina wrote:Let me get this straight, you are placing me at the bottom of your reads with my own scumread?
I have no clue why people even try that silly line, considering scum are huge fans of things like, "distancing" & "bussing".In post 395, Guillotina wrote:It's ridiculous to think ssmb and I are teamed
That's a spicy take and I like it.In post 457, Angel Warriors wrote:In post 435, Dwlee99 wrote:House just doesn't know I'm the third mason cause I haven't posted in the PT yet
I'm sorry you repped into a scum slot
"Muddying the waters" isn't something I'd refer to as 'zero'.In post 508, Roden wrote:Just stating my thought process at the time. Not sure why that's being questioned since it does literally zero to aid me if I'm scum.In post 507, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why bring it up then?In post 424, Roden wrote:In post 421, Guillotina wrote:How come? I didn't see anything in the OP that hinted 3P.In post 418, Roden wrote:I believe third party is a possibility.Because this isn't a Normal game and I can't assume we don't have 3P. It's unlikely since I can't imagine what flavor would be used as a reason to include it, but it's not impossible AFAIK.In post 423, Gamma Emerald wrote:how so?In post 418, Roden wrote:I believe third party is a possibility.
Interesting.In post 575, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m actually warming to AW!scumIn post 469, Titus wrote:I'd like some engagement on why AW is town considering I have an unpopular view.
T3 does seem to be really tuned into my interactions, doesn't he?In post 579, Lukewarm wrote:I did not really think that they were your mason partner before, and mainly just thought that idea was just coming from T3.In post 567, House wrote:I think it's hilarious that Angel is speculated to be my partner, then all of a sudden there's this push to eliminate them.
If I was a more savvy person, I'd probably consider the person that started that push as scum for trying to eliminate a suspected Mason in order to fish out a claim.
But I'm not that nuanced.
But now seeing this post coming from you tho..
UNVOTE:
Umm.In post 584, Gamma Emerald wrote:It also happened after RMH hit E-1, which is probably the biggest reason why I haven’t done much with my AW suspicionsIn post 567, House wrote:I think it's hilarious that Angel is speculated to be my partner, then all of a sudden there's this push to eliminate them.
If I was a more savvy person, I'd probably consider the person that started that push as scum for trying to eliminate a suspected Mason in order to fish out a claim.
But I'm not that nuanced.