You're that paranoid of me now, huh?
Oh. Elim all liars.
VOTE: T3
Nope, and I don't think it's just flavor either. Could be a hint about one of the three "weird looking fighters". Innocent child, maybe? Or it could be something a little more obscure. Either way I'm not digging into potential PRs.In post 8, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:btw never played Chrono Trigger, I see one of the knights of guardia is like half-sized in the flavor posts, is there a dwarf or something that would explain that?
I'm pretty sure everyone should be able to read him based off of his fake claim by now.In post 49, Lukewarm wrote:I second this. It has not worked out well for you in the past, so please don't just keep doing itIn post 43, Angel Warriors wrote:I would absolutely appreciate it if you didnt make this fakeclaiming a habit
Ah, ok. One of the player lists had the slot as Nora instead so I didn't know if it was an alt. I think it got slipped who's playing the hydra, though I'm not entirely sure how hydras work.
Oh, no what I mean is T3 will eventually make a genuine claim/fake claim at some point and we'll have a better grasp on his slot then. This is just RVS atm so I'm not assuming anything yet.In post 58, Lukewarm wrote:He has made the same fake claim 3 games in a row now (like, same role and everything), so I don't actually think that it is all that AI at this point.In post 55, Roden wrote:I'm pretty sure everyone should be able to read him based off of his fake claim by now.In post 49, Lukewarm wrote:I second this. It has not worked out well for you in the past, so please don't just keep doing itIn post 43, Angel Warriors wrote:I would absolutely appreciate it if you didnt make this fakeclaiming a habit
Also Luke I hope you're town because I've only ever seen your town games and don't know how you play scum at all.
Like scum T3 would 100% make the claim now that he can just point back at the other 2 games.
So, I am not saying it is scummy, but I do not think it is a reason to town read him
Heyo.In post 59, Lukewarm wrote:Also, hello!
A couple, both Newbie games. First one was with T3 but we lost. Second was with BlurryX/JamesTheNames and we won. 2066 and 2070 if you want to meta me at some point.In post 60, Lukewarm wrote:I have only ever seen you as town so far as well. Have you played a scum game yet?
In post 68, Angel Warriors wrote:More than one player occupies this accountIn post 67, Roden wrote:Ah, ok. One of the player lists had the slot as Nora instead so I didn't know if it was an alt. I think it got slipped who's playing the hydra, though I'm not entirely sure how hydras work.
Noraa is one of them momrangal is the other
What does noraa bring in this slot do for you?
Yeah it was this. Though tbh I'm over that, Bulge is the only one I came away with a negative opinion of that game. I was mainly just wondering so I know whether to expect a death tunnel and to be able to react accordingly.In post 69, Angel Warriors wrote:to put it very nicely, roden and I didnt get along in our last game together.
-nor nor bear
Hmm...just one game might make it harder to notice scum tells. Then again, it should be easier to notice town discrepancie, so we'll see.In post 70, Lukewarm wrote:Will keep those in mind, if I decide to meta you laterIn post 67, Roden wrote:A couple, both Newbie games. First one was with T3 but we lost. Second was with BlurryX/JamesTheNames and we won. 2066 and 2070 if you want to meta me at some point.In post 60, Lukewarm wrote:I have only ever seen you as town so far as well. Have you played a scum game yet?
Although, I am a bit jealous because I have had only 1 scum game (Newbie 2067) so far
It's been half and half for me (sample size of 2 lol), but I've also won both rep ins so it's been a good experience for me.In post 73, Angel Warriors wrote:piece of advice: dont rep into newbie games. typically the rep outs are scum.
other thing, LMFAO when the fuck did pooky say that please link that lmaooo
-bearnor
Nora you literally admitted you couldn't explain your scum read on me right up until your rep out lol. You just didn't want to admit your read on me was bad, which was what I kept telling you and was conclusively confirmed with my rep in's flip. My reaction was bad, I'll admit, but I react poorly to bad scum reads.In post 82, Angel Warriors wrote:found itLukewarm do you have thoughts on the game at this point?In post 279, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:T3 has one of the biggest set of balls on the site
And roden i didnt tunnel you and have been over that with you multiple times I believe. You were reacting badly to a simple scum read and turned it into something that wasn't necessary.
-bear bear bee
You're not concerned about a Roleblocker? When I got JoaT in a different game, a RB was also in the mix and completely neutralized me.In post 84, House wrote:Ok, so after some interesting discussion in the PT, I have some cool info to share.
I'm a mason JoaT.
My partner is a mason bodyguard.
The reason I am claiming is because we agree that their flip when I am targeted will confirm me and buy me an extra day, and we expect that I will not be the n1 target as scum typically avoids the "obvious" kill in order to prevent being busted by investigatives or preempted by protectives.
I will not flavor claim until my partner dies, at which point I will claim flavor and the uses of my JoaT shots.
I'll add I don't want any bad blood here and would prefer if you didn't replace out because of me.In post 85, Roden wrote:Nora you literally admitted you couldn't explain your scum read on me right up until your rep out lol. You just didn't want to admit your read on me was bad, which was what I kept telling you and was conclusively confirmed with my rep in's flip. My reaction was bad, I'll admit, but I react poorly to bad scum reads.In post 82, Angel Warriors wrote:found itLukewarm do you have thoughts on the game at this point?In post 279, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:T3 has one of the biggest set of balls on the site
And roden i didnt tunnel you and have been over that with you multiple times I believe. You were reacting badly to a simple scum read and turned it into something that wasn't necessary.
-bear bear bee
In post 93, Lukewarm wrote:Currently thinking that Roden is town, the unprompted links to scum meta feels townie to meIn post 82, Angel Warriors wrote:Lukewarm do you have thoughts on the game at this point?
Oof. I think I just got set up as the first NK.In post 84, House wrote:we expect that I will not be the n1 target as scum typically avoids the "obvious" kill in order to prevent being busted by investigatives or preempted by protectives.
Scum vibes off of this tbh. I never said you couldn't scum read me and town wouldn't back down if they actually thought someone was scummy.In post 97, Angel Warriors wrote:how is that townie and also give me other reads please? I'm not interested in reading roden because I'll just get yelled at if I dont town read him.In post 93, Lukewarm wrote:Currently thinking that Roden is town, the unprompted links to scum meta feels townie to meIn post 82, Angel Warriors wrote:Lukewarm do you have thoughts on the game at this point?
-noraaaaaa
More scum vibes. Why are both of you putting words in my mouth?In post 98, Angel Warriors wrote:In post 85, Roden wrote:Nora you literally admitted you couldn't explain your scum read on me right up until your rep out lol. You just didn't want to admit your read on me was bad, which was what I kept telling you and was conclusively confirmed with my rep in's flip. My reaction was bad, I'll admit, but I react poorly to bad scum reads.
Ok, but it isnt Noraa making the push here. Defaulting to "Oh noraa you can't read me" isn't going to work.
-momma
Wanna clarify further here?
I'd love to hear your reasons why. Because right now it looks like you're scum trying to push a mis-elim that you can excuse with an emotional reaction to a previous game. You're looking for bias to protect you and that's not gonna work here.Angel Warriors wrote:Wholehearted disagree.In post 93, Lukewarm wrote:Currently thinking that Roden is town, the unprompted links to scum meta feels townie to meIn post 82, Angel Warriors wrote:Lukewarm do you have thoughts on the game at this point?
I'm not verse on his meta but so far, quite a few slots are already towning themselves up.
He underwhelming, and so far is getting pushed lower and lower into the bottom of my list.
Also, he is clearly not a mason here
Going by flavor, I think there actually are Masons.In post 106, T3 wrote:inb4 no masonry.
Town has zero motivation not to clarify a read. Thanks for scum claiming, we can get you on Day 2.In post 115, House wrote:Nope.In post 112, Roden wrote:Wanna clarify further here?
112 solidifies my vote, though. That shade on Angel is hideous.
The nervous vibes being put out by Roden would make for a booming bass line.
Big oof if true.In post 118, T3 wrote: Or... Angel and House are Masons.
???In post 123, House wrote:I can't help that you can't handle already having 2 votes and your sad attempt at shaking them by implying you were nk bait was immediately laughed off.In post 119, Roden wrote:"Nervous vibes on the first IRL day of Day 1 that also will go on for fourteen days" is not a real read or believable thought process.
Toughen up, chief.
This mindset loses town games. Again, not a good look. Especially when I just FOS'd you for doing exactly what you just did here.In post 126, Angel Warriors wrote:Ngl I want to elim roden solely because of his play style. I forget what the word for that is rn. brain fart moment.In post 115, House wrote:112 solidifies my vote, though. That shade on Angel is hideous.
The nervous vibes being put out by Roden would make for a booming bass line.
however, his reactions to scum reads is absolute shit and I'm putting that very kindly. lay off a bit and see how he does because I assure you that he is only going to make your scum read on him twenty billion times greater if you dont give him a lot of space.
-nor nor bear bear
Pressure =/= actual scum read. Unless you think you should be allowed to coast because of a PR claim?House wrote:I know he scumreads me.In post 126, Angel Warriors wrote:Ngl I want to elim roden solely because of his play style. I forget what the word for that is rn. brain fart moment.In post 115, House wrote:112 solidifies my vote, though. That shade on Angel is hideous.
The nervous vibes being put out by Roden would make for a booming bass line.
however, his reactions to scum reads is absolute shit and I'm putting that very kindly. lay off a bit and see how he does because I assure you that he is only going to make your scum read on him twenty billion times greater if you dont give him a lot of space.
-nor nor bear bear
This is the Mafia equivalent of trying the "Got your nose!" trick on a grown ass adult.House wrote:See? Angel and I obviously aren't partnered.
That's a PT exchange.
Now, move on.
Look at my scum games if you want to see my actual scum playstyle. I always play like this as town and play completely the opposite as scum i.e. play to be likable and be town read.Angel Warriors wrote:I think Lukewarm is scum if anyone wants to debate that with me. I think T3 and roden are scummy but I'm unwilling to look at them much at this point because their play styles are naturally scummy.
-bear nornor
This is weirdly smug for someone who isn't actually attempting to read me. Do you usually take everything at face value?In post 139, House wrote:If you're that antsy about votes as town, actually rolling scum = 10x worse on the old nerves.In post 138, House wrote:Definitely not outside the realm of possibility, given https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=86996In post 135, Roden wrote:???In post 123, House wrote:I can't help that you can't handle already having 2 votes and your sad attempt at shaking them by implying you were nk bait was immediately laughed off.In post 119, Roden wrote:"Nervous vibes on the first IRL day of Day 1 that also will go on for fourteen days" is not a real read or believable thought process.
Toughen up, chief.
What? Lol this can't be a real post. Unless you genuinely believe I'm afraid of getting flash wagon'd 24 hours into Day 1?
I play like this as town because I rely more on logic than vibes. I genuinely have trouble reading interactions and I'm not good at catching lies/reading intentions. But I'm fairly competent at catching people when it comes to their reactions.In post 148, Angel Warriors wrote:I didnt bother to read roden's scum game last time, but he is actually right that his scum game is all nice.
a brief brief skim truly does show that he plays "nice" in scum games
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... er_sort=Go
Roden, I get it. you're town but there's no reason to act the way you are. I understand that you think your scum and town games are vastly different but that doesn't mean other people can see it as clearly. we are sorting you in good faith and you gain nothing from lashing out at everyone.
I tried very hard to work with you in summertime. If you decide to treat me the way you did that game, I am going to be very upset. Please stop. I will town case you. Stop arguing with people and just think. You are engaging people that you think are town in such bad faith. That is not going to get you anywhere. Literally, they are only going to get upset and think you are scum. What do you gain from that? You gain nothing so please stop.
-beario
What do you think I'm doing?House wrote:You're not exactly giving me much to work with.In post 147, Roden wrote:I'm honestly super easy to read and consider it one of my bigger weaknesses, but most people just don't bother trying to read me for whatever reason. They just vibe check a random post then park their vote.
Who's scum? All you seen to care about is whining about my vote.
Get over it and scum hunt.
NAI but it's an easy town cred post if scum.In post 160, House wrote:What do you make of 89?In post 158, Roden wrote:Don't complain about my attitude if you're just gonna be rude and complain yourself. I don't know if you're actually town and it would be a bad play to blindly believe your claim.
In post 164, Angel Warriors wrote:interesting. roden is now acting super towny. I'm inclined to go back to SR him again.
-indecisivenornor
Fair assessment tbh but I wouldn't need to WIFOM you like that. I'd just play nice right from the start since you respond better to that. The fact Nora is being consistent with her reactions from before is what makes me town read your slot.In post 166, Angel Warriors wrote:So the thing is that seeing him blow up over a couple votes really reminded me of summertime.
then looking at his scum game was a real OH WOW moment there like wtf the contrast is insane.
I guess I'm worried because he's sounding too towny now. and I can easy excuse the blow ups by saying "oh well its directly targeted at me so I'll TR him by meta"
and mom thinks his reasons to SR us are total crap and I do trust in her reads a lot.
IDK.
-sucks
Normally I'd agree but it's T3, he himself has already said he town reads people no matter his alignment and I believe it's an honest admission. He'll make his alignment clear eventually, so I'm not looking too much into it atm. It'll be good to look at when ISO diving towards EoD though.In post 168, House wrote:I think scum would be more likely to grant an instant townread over a powerful pr claim because they lack the paranoia of not knowing my alignment.In post 167, Roden wrote:NAI but it's an easy town cred post if scum.In post 160, House wrote:What do you make of 89?In post 158, Roden wrote:Don't complain about my attitude if you're just gonna be rude and complain yourself. I don't know if you're actually town and it would be a bad play to blindly believe your claim.
Of course, my partner would also not have that paranoia, as well.
I was just curious about where your head was with that.
Not surprised I misused the term tbh.Angel Warriors wrote:oh that's not wifom lol.
-bear beario
Pressure takes different forms, and many things I say are not serious, especially when I claim that they are. I think people can and will slip up when they feel confident in what they're saying or doing, but you didn't. That's why I think you're genuine.In post 205, Angel Warriors wrote:"This head is giving me scum vibes and the other head is also giving me scum vibes, feelings are strong enough to place down a serious vote but oh! Btw I don't actually scum read your slot, I was just reaction testing"
This response feels fake. You're essentially mad that she didn't add a "IMO" at the end of her post when that should be implied with any and all reads. Nobody actually knows what anyone is thinking, they can only guess and interpret.In post 307, Guillotina wrote:You are scumreading me for something you can't possibly know, you are not right next to me to tell me that I'm worried about posting lol, how would you if I had just posted like 4 times and you have no idea of who i am as a player. I don't believe you genuinely scumread me, you just picked up a fight with someone you thought it was a Goldfish and the Goldfish turned out to be a Shark.In post 296, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:You assume that I have to have meta on you to scumread you for some reason. I didnt have meta on Italiano and I plucked him out on page 11.
Then why aren't you pushing her? All you're doing is arguing with each other but neither of you are making a case to convince the rest of us. You in particular apparently seem certain Kyouko is a fake, but you're settling to just squabble.Guillotina wrote:And i don't, hence my vote on you. I've played this game for two decades now, I know a fake when they think they can get an "LHF" over.In post 312, ssbm_Kyouko wrote: Again, I don't need meta on you to scumread you for what I have perceived your motivations and thoughts to be. I've explained how I came to that conclusion. You can choose whether to believe my thoughts are real or not.
Not today corazón!
In post 322, Guillotina wrote:In post 321, Guillotina wrote:In post 314, Roden wrote:This response feels fake. You're essentially mad that she didn't add a "IMO" at the end of her post when that should be implied with any and all reads. Nobody actually knows what anyone is thinking, they can only guess and interpret.
Then why aren't you pushing her? All you're doing is arguing with each other but neither of you are making a case to convince the rest of us. You in particular apparently seem certain Kyouko is a fake, but you're settling to just squabble.
This feels like a fake argument.: When did I say that I was mad because she didn't say "IMO"? Don't put words in my mouth, thank you very much. What I've been saying and I will defend it with fist and teeth is that their read on me is fake, because there is no possible way for them to know that I was feeling afraid of posting. Afraid of what? This is not my first game, I didn't rand wolf and I'm a very effective wolf killer! I'm not afraid! I just have a life! Yesterday I was busy having a life with family so I just tried posting fun images and memes reacting to stuff, I do this all the time. So, why does it imply that me posting them equals to being afraid of posting here? Like who the hell do they think they are for them to believe that I'm afraid of them or any of you for that matter? Haaaaaaa! It both hurts my pride and makes me laugh at the same time, don't treat me like a noob please.Orange
Red
I am pushing them but if you are waiting for me to make a case you'll be waiting because I'm not that type, in fact, I'm the kind of player that needs to be convinced of, I read cases, compare the thought processes with my own and then at night I mess wolves up. You open, I finish. You case, I terminate them. That is the deal here.
Didn't get a response. Considering his recent posts, it's clear why that is.In post 340, Roden wrote:In post 322, Guillotina wrote:In post 321, Guillotina wrote:In post 314, Roden wrote:This response feels fake. You're essentially mad that she didn't add a "IMO" at the end of her post when that should be implied with any and all reads. Nobody actually knows what anyone is thinking, they can only guess and interpret.
Then why aren't you pushing her? All you're doing is arguing with each other but neither of you are making a case to convince the rest of us. You in particular apparently seem certain Kyouko is a fake, but you're settling to just squabble.
This feels like a fake argument.: When did I say that I was mad because she didn't say "IMO"? Don't put words in my mouth, thank you very much. What I've been saying and I will defend it with fist and teeth is that their read on me is fake, because there is no possible way for them to know that I was feeling afraid of posting. Afraid of what? This is not my first game, I didn't rand wolf and I'm a very effective wolf killer! I'm not afraid! I just have a life! Yesterday I was busy having a life with family so I just tried posting fun images and memes reacting to stuff, I do this all the time. So, why does it imply that me posting them equals to being afraid of posting here? Like who the hell do they think they are for them to believe that I'm afraid of them or any of you for that matter? Haaaaaaa! It both hurts my pride and makes me laugh at the same time, don't treat me like a noob please.Orange
Red
I am pushing them but if you are waiting for me to make a case you'll be waiting because I'm not that type, in fact, I'm the kind of player that needs to be convinced of, I read cases, compare the thought processes with my own and then at night I mess wolves up. You open, I finish. You case, I terminate them. That is the deal here.: You don't have to say you're mad, it's just how you're coming across. She never said she "knew" you were afraid but you're slipping that you were. All she did was read you and not only did you take the claim way too seriously, you've ultimately justified it with your response. Your post here pings heavily as AtE especially with your OMGUS vote.Orange
: Are you not actually certain that Kyouko is scum then?Red
Opportunistic how? I'm the only vote on you lol. If I'm scum here, then am I Kyouko's buddy or did I decide to take her side in a TvT?In post 397, Guillotina wrote:I thought it was a rethoric question, it is obvious that i think ssbm could be scum but certain? Never.In post 391, Roden wrote:Didn't get a response. Considering his recent posts, it's clear why that is.In post 340, Roden wrote:In post 322, Guillotina wrote:In post 321, Guillotina wrote:In post 314, Roden wrote:This response feels fake. You're essentially mad that she didn't add a "IMO" at the end of her post when that should be implied with any and all reads. Nobody actually knows what anyone is thinking, they can only guess and interpret.
Then why aren't you pushing her? All you're doing is arguing with each other but neither of you are making a case to convince the rest of us. You in particular apparently seem certain Kyouko is a fake, but you're settling to just squabble.
This feels like a fake argument.: When did I say that I was mad because she didn't say "IMO"? Don't put words in my mouth, thank you very much. What I've been saying and I will defend it with fist and teeth is that their read on me is fake, because there is no possible way for them to know that I was feeling afraid of posting. Afraid of what? This is not my first game, I didn't rand wolf and I'm a very effective wolf killer! I'm not afraid! I just have a life! Yesterday I was busy having a life with family so I just tried posting fun images and memes reacting to stuff, I do this all the time. So, why does it imply that me posting them equals to being afraid of posting here? Like who the hell do they think they are for them to believe that I'm afraid of them or any of you for that matter? Haaaaaaa! It both hurts my pride and makes me laugh at the same time, don't treat me like a noob please.Orange
Red
I am pushing them but if you are waiting for me to make a case you'll be waiting because I'm not that type, in fact, I'm the kind of player that needs to be convinced of, I read cases, compare the thought processes with my own and then at night I mess wolves up. You open, I finish. You case, I terminate them. That is the deal here.: You don't have to say you're mad, it's just how you're coming across. She never said she "knew" you were afraid but you're slipping that you were. All she did was read you and not only did you take the claim way too seriously, you've ultimately justified it with your response. Your post here pings heavily as AtE especially with your OMGUS vote.Orange
: Are you not actually certain that Kyouko is scum then?Red
VOTE: Guillotina
That vote looks opportunistic.
Not really? Day 1 scum theatre isn't hard to pull off when everybody is working with only baseline reads. Especially when early wagons don't usually last anyway. Now's actually the best time to try to pull it off with as few consequences as possible.In post 404, Guillotina wrote:Then ssbm and i should get oscars then because it this is theater, we are the best goddamn actors.In post 401, House wrote:I have no clue why people even try that silly line, considering scum are huge fans of things like, "distancing" & "bussing".In post 395, Guillotina wrote:It's ridiculous to think ssmb and I are teamed
I think I need to let your slot simmer for now then.In post 411, Guillotina wrote:Hmmm i keep forgetting this is a two-week day phase game.In post 409, Roden wrote:Not really? Day 1 scum theatre isn't hard to pull off when everybody is working with only baseline reads. Especially when early wagons don't usually last anyway. Now's actually the best time to try to pull it off with as few consequences as possible.In post 404, Guillotina wrote:Then ssbm and i should get oscars then because it this is theater, we are the best goddamn actors.In post 401, House wrote:I have no clue why people even try that silly line, considering scum are huge fans of things like, "distancing" & "bussing".In post 395, Guillotina wrote:It's ridiculous to think ssmb and I are teamed
Spoiler:
This is not scum theater but you can be town for that assessment.
Gun to my head, I'll always say town unless somebody really slips up. If I'm certain somebody's scum, you'll know it because I'll case them and hard push them instead of just asking questions or pressuring them.In post 412, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Roden, gun to your head, am I town or scum, and why?
In post 421, Guillotina wrote:How come? I didn't see anything in the OP that hinted 3P.In post 418, Roden wrote:I believe third party is a possibility.
Because this isn't a Normal game and I can't assume we don't have 3P. It's unlikely since I can't imagine what flavor would be used as a reason to include it, but it's not impossible AFAIK.In post 423, Gamma Emerald wrote:how so?In post 418, Roden wrote:I believe third party is a possibility.
Yes. You'll see it early on actually.Dwlee99 wrote:Also we have any claims or anything yet?
This is a very hard defend on Guillo. I didn't expect that but since I'm town reading you and I don't think scum blatantly defends each other like this, I'll back off. Are you confident enough on this that we should basically consider him conftown?Noraa wrote:Guillo is town. everyone back the fuck off. last time I saw guillo scum, I caught him on page 10 or something. trust me on this one. Guillo is town. Period. this isn't what scum him looks like. I would swear it on my life legitimately.
-bera bear bear
The only thing we should infer that I feel comfortable openly saying is that we don't have all the information. There's clearly more to the role reveal than House is willing to say and I think it wouldn't be helpful to town to speculate about it.In post 431, Dwlee99 wrote:Why did they claim that though
I tried checking your ISO to find what posts pinged you but I'm not finding much that wasn't from RVS or a different game. Is it just the slot's playstyle?In post 437, Titus wrote:Angel but that's something my gut screams. I don't have hard evidence. It doesn't help I thought Noraa was in a hydra she wasn't in.In post 427, Dwlee99 wrote:Hi folks. Who are the baddies?
I'm assuming their start this game is similar to how they started that game then? You said their early posts were scummy but ignored.In post 443, Titus wrote:It reminds me more of the last game I modded than their towngame.In post 441, Roden wrote:I tried checking your ISO to find what posts pinged you but I'm not finding much that wasn't from RVS or a different game. Is it just the slot's playstyle?In post 437, Titus wrote:Angel but that's something my gut screams. I don't have hard evidence. It doesn't help I thought Noraa was in a hydra she wasn't in.In post 427, Dwlee99 wrote:Hi folks. Who are the baddies?
Idk, Nora was ready to policy elim me and was ready to just not like me at all this game. If anything I think it looks like I'm WK'ing them.In post 442, Titus wrote:Why? I find it whiteknighty myself.In post 438, T3 wrote:I found their hard defense of Roden and Guillo to be strongly ++++++++++town.In post 437, Titus wrote:Angel but that's something my gut screams. I don't have hard evidence. It doesn't help I thought Noraa was in a hydra she wasn't in.In post 427, Dwlee99 wrote:Hi folks. Who are the baddies?
They put in the effort to meta me and readjusted their read on me because of it. I think Nora specifically could've gotten away with just death tunneling me and leaving it at that since that would cause more chaos while earning herself a stronger town read, since that's exactly what happened last time we played together when she was town. This can change depending on how the rest of the game goes of course, but I don't think AW should be a Day 1 elim.In post 469, Titus wrote:I'd like some engagement on why AW is town considering I have an unpopular view.
Emphasis on skimming but, yeah I see what you mean now. This is not the Nora I recognize. Granted I only played one game with her before so I didn't feel confident trying to meta her, and I don't think it's fair to scum read someone when they're trying to improve their town game, but this looks incredibly condemning. Gonna read more before I come to a decision but even the scum PT seems revealing.In post 493, Titus wrote:@Roden, Skip Noraa's ISO in Pooky v Flavor Leaf and get back to me.
This was an oof but also an eye opener.In post 46, Spiffeh wrote:Noraa should try to spam it up in an obv town way anyway and then everyone'll think she's town!
Guillo seemed ready to death tunnel you, and I wasn't vibing with your response. But I think it makes more sense that he was just super sensitive to getting scum read for the wrong reasons, not necessarily because he's actually scum but because he didn't think your reasoning was good. He claimed to be certain you were scum but backed down when questioned more on it, which made me think it was an emotional/pride thing. Basically I do think it's possible to be a fake response but for you both to be town anyway.In post 492, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:What seems fake about it?In post 418, Roden wrote:I don't think the interaction between you and Guillotina is genuine, but idk if it's both of you or just one of you. It's not guaranteed either of you are scum either even if I'm right, since I believe third party is a possibility.
No, I wanted to see how confident they were in the read. They never answered though, which isn't a good look tbh.In post 487, Guillotina wrote:Do you hardcore townread the Angels to consider their townreads as Confitown?In post 432, Roden wrote:Oh interesting, we got Dwlee now.
Yes. You'll see it early on actually.Dwlee99 wrote:Also we have any claims or anything yet?
This is a very hard defend on Guillo. I didn't expect that but since I'm town reading you and I don't think scum blatantly defends each other like this, I'll back off. Are you confident enough on this that we should basically consider him conftown?Noraa wrote:Guillo is town. everyone back the fuck off. last time I saw guillo scum, I caught him on page 10 or something. trust me on this one. Guillo is town. Period. this isn't what scum him looks like. I would swear it on my life legitimately.
-bera bear bear
Claiming the Kyouko is getting scum read for bad reasons but then still voting her anyway without giving any reasons of her own. This is so out of character for her and such a wild shift from my last encounter that I think I feel the same way she did when she meta'd me and saw my scum games.In post 244, Angel Warriors wrote:Ngl. I think all of the reasons to scum read Kyoto are bad however I agree with the conclusion that Kyoto is scum. im inclined to towered t3 despite his reason being wrong because it sounds towny enough that he's picking at something super insignificant.In post 202, Robert M Hunter wrote:Good catch.In post 182, T3 wrote:Whoa, whoa, whoa, wait a minute.In post 177, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Well I did want to vote luke up until 174, but now we have Noraa Roden and luke town, House off the table but tbh I skimmed him as i was focused on reading roden/nora.In post 136, Angel Warriors wrote:I think Lukewarm is scum if anyone wants to debate that with me. I think T3 and roden are scummy but I'm unwilling to look at them much at this point because their play styles are naturally scummy.
-bear nornor
I think i understand the T3 votes but i dont know yet if I agree with them. I'd rather VOTE: Guillotina right now
"I understand where the T3 votes are coming from"
The.... 2 RVS votes?
VOTE: ssbm
VOTE: ssbm
-Nor bear bear bear
Oh god, you really do just play like this, huh?In post 496, Dwlee99 wrote:No and I haven't read anything.In post 494, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Are you caught up?In post 468, Dwlee99 wrote:If we get a claim I wouldn't mind hammering it even though there is time left. People can catch up at night : shrug:
Because nobody's defending him and he isn't giving us any content to work with. Like this is literally doing nothing. We got more content when I was being wagon'd and I'm town. Hell I'm fine with votes on me if that gives people stuff to say. My post isn't a soft defend because there's nothing in that post even remotely exonerating him or that could be seen as an attempt at town casing him.In post 498, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:What is the purpose of this post? As far as I can tell it's unrelated to any conversation thread and the last time Luke mentioned a T3 scum read was kind of far back.In post 456, Roden wrote:If multiple people are confident on Luke being town then I think his read on T3 has merit.
I cant figure out what you're thinking here. For as much interaction as you have with quite a few people, and for as much as it looks like you're possibly trying to find scum, I was surprised to see you haven't interacted with or commented on RMH, except once in 439, where you softly defend his slot for a really bad reason. It doesn't occur to you that RMH is scum waiting out the pressure and laying low? It occurs to me that this is what's happening and it's your job to redirect the heat.
Why shouldn't he be a wagon?
I mean, yes. I don't think it's a helpful wagon to have atm unless we're feeling pretty good about voting out RMH. And tbh I'm just not seeing a strong case against him, nor a reason to end Day 1 early.In post 499, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:The only thing 456 correlates to is derailing the RMH wagon imo
Luke's scum case is hardly the most interesting thing to happen in this thread and we both know that. No offense intended, Luke.In post 500, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:And the fact Luke's read is so far back indicates to me Roden was searching for anything to grasp onto
I don't know what you could possibly be trying to imply here other than me being scum partners with you. This is not a good response.In post 504, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:You weren't vibing withIn post 497, Roden wrote:Guillo seemed ready to death tunnel you, and I wasn't vibing with your response. But I think it makes more sense that he was just super sensitive to getting scum read for the wrong reasons, not necessarily because he's actually scum but because he didn't think your reasoning was good. He claimed to be certain you were scum but backed down when questioned more on it, which made me think it was an emotional/pride thing. Basically I do think it's possible to be a fake response but for you both to be town anyway.In post 492, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:What seems fake about it?In post 418, Roden wrote:I don't think the interaction between you and Guillotina is genuine, but idk if it's both of you or just one of you. It's not guaranteed either of you are scum either even if I'm right, since I believe third party is a possibility.myresponse, but you votedGuillotina, even though he is the one you perceived as having a prideful reaction that could be fake, and coming from town.
So why Guillotina rather than me?
Just stating my thought process at the time. Not sure why that's being questioned since it does literally zero to aid me if I'm scum.In post 507, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why bring it up then?In post 424, Roden wrote:In post 421, Guillotina wrote:How come? I didn't see anything in the OP that hinted 3P.In post 418, Roden wrote:I believe third party is a possibility.Because this isn't a Normal game and I can't assume we don't have 3P. It's unlikely since I can't imagine what flavor would be used as a reason to include it, but it's not impossible AFAIK.In post 423, Gamma Emerald wrote:how so?In post 418, Roden wrote:I believe third party is a possibility.
I see, that's understandable.In post 512, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don’t think it’s likely myself and my first blush response was to view the suggestion with skepticismIn post 509, Roden wrote:Actually what made you respond to that in particular?
Thinking about it now I kinda regard it as harmless
How can I be partnery with Luke when you said you read my scum games? You would've seen that I either barely interact with my partner and/or just bus them if they're doomed anyway.In post 515, Angel Warriors wrote:I might be confbiasing currently reading up with suspicions on lukewarm. this feels super partner-yIn post 456, Roden wrote:If multiple people are confident on Luke being town then I think his read on T3 has merit.
what a way to actually cover all bases in one post. this post is super backtrack-y in a way that im not sure how to explain.In post 467, Roden wrote:At the risk of giving myself scum equity in case it is a red flip, I don't recommend hammering when we still have 11 days to go and we still have people trying to catch up.
I hate this because it gives room to reverse his TR on us the moment its no longer popular/consensus. he knows that titus is someone thats played with me a decent amount(from her posts. she is directly metaing me) and hes asking her why which is a really easy entrance to the SR AW clubhouse.In post 471, Roden wrote:They put in the effort to meta me and readjusted their read on me because of it. I think Nora specifically could've gotten away with just death tunneling me and leaving it at that since that would cause more chaos while earning herself a stronger town read, since that's exactly what happened last time we played together when she was town. This can change depending on how the rest of the game goes of course, but I don't think AW should be a Day 1 elim.In post 469, Titus wrote:I'd like some engagement on why AW is town considering I have an unpopular view.
Does she still tunnel people as scum? Or does she play more conservatively?
-theangelnronor
This is just a reworded "omg you suck" lol. I'm looking at the same scum game Titus is using to scum read you so I'm not sure why I'm getting flak for looking at it and not the person who said to use it to meta you.In post 520, Angel Warriors wrote:hahahahahhaha. alright I will take a look at this old scum game of mine. you're totally bullshitting. this isn't what my scum game looks like.In post 497, Roden wrote:this looks incredibly condemning
I have not tried to pocket a single person here. my reads and thought process are clean as fuck. this aint my town game and I dont believe town ever takes a look at one of my scum games and thinks its "condemning" after a SKIM.
especially since you are a fairly new player. I dont believe town do that.
I have INCREDIBLY strong scum feels on roden right now. like INCREDIBLY no joke. let me take a look through this "condemning" lmfao scum game of mine.
I will go see how *CONDEMNING* it is.
-lolijustcaughtscum
Nora you are genuinely notorious for tunneling to the point that people other than me bring it up. My play wasn't bad either, I caught both scum but you kept disregarding me.In post 526, Angel Warriors wrote:AtE ALERT.In post 501, Roden wrote:I'm noticing a pattern that every time I get scum read, afterwards it's always scum trying to stick up for me for town points and for a potential pocket lol. Also every time I feel bad about wanting to suspect someone, it's because they were scum trying to manipulate me.
I really hate the idea of wagoning Nora just because she isn't tunneling people against all reason, and it's possible because she's using a hydra and has a second opinion to bounce off of that she's reeled herself back this game. But it's page 20 now and I haven't seen a single wall post or tunnel or even a pounce. The AW slot in general doesn't seem to trust me fully, but I think a paranoid Nora would've done something about that by now to let us know just how paranoid she is of me. Hell, she voted RMH but hasn't shown any progression on that at all, since right before the vote she actually agreed with RMH that Kyouko was scummy.
NAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH i tunneled you because your play was bad.
also I dont do that every single game???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
mehhhhhhhh I dont buy that. nahhhhhhhhh literally nah. we haven't posted in like 3 pages and mom was the one that wanted RMH.
what's your point? and why would I be paranoid of you? its not like I've seen one of your scum games ever before. where is the paranoia from?
-nornorbearbear
In post 43, Angel Warriors wrote:I would absolutely appreciate it if you didnt make this fakeclaiming a habit
Also
VOTE: roden
Blatant scum, let's go grab him
-mother angel
In post 164, Angel Warriors wrote:interesting. roden is now acting super towny. I'm inclined to go back to SR him again.
-indecisivenornor
In post 166, Angel Warriors wrote:So the thing is that seeing him blow up over a couple votes really reminded me of summertime.
then looking at his scum game was a real OH WOW moment there like wtf the contrast is insane.
I guess I'm worried because he's sounding too towny now. and I can easy excuse the blow ups by saying "oh well its directly targeted at me so I'll TR him by meta"
and mom thinks his reasons to SR us are total crap and I do trust in her reads a lot.
IDK.
-sucks
In post 445, Angel Warriors wrote:................................................................................................................................................................In post 432, Roden wrote:I didn't expect that but since I'm town reading you and I don't think scum blatantly defends each other like this
-mmkay
If none of this is paranoia then were you actually just certain I was town? Because it's strange that your entire read on me flips just because I'm considering a universe where you could be scum. I didn't say you were 100% scum and I didn't even vote you. Yet you're melting down just because I specifically think there's a case for you to be scum.In post 446, Angel Warriors wrote:<33333 you didnt roll malefactor again right? promise me?In post 436, T3 wrote:I'm strongly inclined to trust Noraa on this.
The town: T3, House, Angel, Guillo, Roden
The scum: Lukewarm, RMH
Guillo is LOCKTOWN. like 100% certainty.
roden i am still processing atm.
-bearbearnor
What makes it a bad reason? Genuine question.In post 523, ssbm_Kyouko wrote: This is a bad reason to stop the wagon. It's not like the thread is waiting with bated breath for RMH to come and post - there's still plenty of conversation going about other avenues. We should be giving him a free pass to wait out the pressure. You're acting like his wagon is bad for the conversation but I see no indication that this is the case. If you see something that indicates otherwise, could you illustrate that? I'm having a hard time believing this is a real thought process.
You're calling it soft but you just described exactly why my post wasn't a defense. If you're gonna call something a defense, it doesn't matter if you attach "soft" to it, point out the actual defense there. Otherwise you're making an accusation with no actual basis.You say your post isn't a"soft defend", because nothing in it exonerates him or town cases him, but that is exactly why I say it's "soft" - if you were town casing him or arguing against scumcases that had been presented against him, that would be defending or hard defending, depending on the intensity of your post, in my book.
So I'm suspicious for bringing up Luke's case on T3 but also suspicious for not bringing it up enough? This is a reach tbh, it really looks like you're looking for any reason to justify going after me here.I scrolled backward from your post to find Luke's read and it didnt look like a case, but maybe the case came before. If you wanted people to see the case though, I would expect you to say something like "If a lot of people agree Luke is town maybe we should be taking his case on T3 more seriously: <insert quote or post number here>". It just feels like a half-assed attempt to move the wagon someplace else because you dont want to appear too eager.
...You mean how like you're hedging between me and RMH?If you were concerned more with finding scum than derailing RMH you would be coming harder at one of your scumreads. Right now though you're hedging between Angel and T3, probably waiting for one to take off so the pressure comes down from RMH.
Yes, I did recall it. That's why I...recalled it. Not sure what the "gotcha!" is supposed to be here?I'm not sure how this last part relates to what I said. If you weren't searching for it, then you recalled it, so it must have been of some interest to you if you remembered it.
This is purely meant to be a "gotcha!" moment lmao. Like this is blatantly just that. Does this make you scum read me then? This is another genuine question, because now II'm also not sure why you would say it should be spotlighted and that it's not very interesting in the same post.
In post 533, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I'm implying that you're buddying me by taking my side of a TvT fight because I've already expressed a TR on you in 177. The question sounded rhetorical, but I do want to know: why Guillotina over me?In post 505, Roden wrote:I don't know what you could possibly be trying to imply here other than me being scum partners with you. This is not a good response.In post 504, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:You weren't vibing withIn post 497, Roden wrote:Guillo seemed ready to death tunnel you, and I wasn't vibing with your response. But I think it makes more sense that he was just super sensitive to getting scum read for the wrong reasons, not necessarily because he's actually scum but because he didn't think your reasoning was good. He claimed to be certain you were scum but backed down when questioned more on it, which made me think it was an emotional/pride thing. Basically I do think it's possible to be a fake response but for you both to be town anyway.In post 492, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:What seems fake about it?In post 418, Roden wrote:I don't think the interaction between you and Guillotina is genuine, but idk if it's both of you or just one of you. It's not guaranteed either of you are scum either even if I'm right, since I believe third party is a possibility.myresponse, but you votedGuillotina, even though he is the one you perceived as having a prideful reaction that could be fake, and coming from town.
So why Guillotina rather than me?
Also it's wild that you think I would buddy you when youIn post 506, Roden wrote:I obviously didn't know what was going on in Guillo's head. And you already had a wagon going that I didn't particularly want to join. I don't think I had particularly complex motives there.
Kyouko, no matter your alignment here, I need you to know you're setting yourself up to be voted out next if you do manage to mis-elim me. Because this isn't simply you being "wrong", you've flat out created a narrative here using your own assumptions to make previous assumptions seem true. This isn't a scum case. This is aIn post 533, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Simple motives do not equal town motives. It's a simple idea to buddy a townie that is TRing you, especially when other town are currently voting that townie. It makes for good towncred later down the line after I've flipped.In post 506, Roden wrote:I obviously didn't know what was going on in Guillo's head. And you already had a wagon going that I didn't particularly want to join. I don't think I had particularly complex motives there.
VOTE: Roden
I think this is a step in the right direction. Sure RMH could be a scum PR but it could just as easily be the case that RMH is town and Roden is looking for towncred for being off and against the wagon, especially with the "at the risk of incriminating myself on a red flip" post. Sounds like an informed post to make - one scum could make in anticipation of the red or green flip that they know is coming.
Because you seemed unable to decide whether I was town or scum even after trying to read me. If you're unsure of what to believe, then that is paranoia.In post 539, Angel Warriors wrote:none of that is even remotely paranoia. you aren't good enough/I dont have enough experience with you to be paranoid of you for any reason. and all the posts you are quoting are just me saying you are scum. how is that paranoia?In post 535, Roden wrote:If none of this is paranoia then were you actually just certain I was town? Because it's strange that your entire read on me flips just because I'm considering a universe where you could be scum. I didn't say you were 100% scum and I didn't even vote you. Yet you're melting down just because I specifically think there's a case for you to be scum.
-norbearbear
...You know this is provable projection, right? Because you scum read me in response to scum reading you. Lol.In post 540, Angel Warriors wrote:an interesting way to catch scum that isn't always correct. but scum LOVE to mirror town's reads on them. look what this scum is doing here.In post 535, Roden wrote:Because it's strange that your entire read on me flips just because I'm considering a universe where you could be scum. I didn't say you were 100% scum and I didn't even vote you.
-norbearbear
You literally just complained that you got scum read. You opened up with a "why me". And all of your posts have become increasingly more AtE within just a couple pages. This isn't the 10/10 play you think it is.In post 541, Angel Warriors wrote:"why me?!" scumIn post 532, Roden wrote:I'm not sure why I'm getting flak for looking at it and not the person who said to use it to meta you.
-nornor
Real talk, this is an actual scum claim. Nora just admitted to the strat she just used.In post 555, Roden wrote:...You know this is provable projection, right? Because you scum read me in response to scum reading you. Lol.In post 540, Angel Warriors wrote:an interesting way to catch scum that isn't always correct. but scum LOVE to mirror town's reads on them. look what this scum is doing here.In post 535, Roden wrote:Because it's strange that your entire read on me flips just because I'm considering a universe where you could be scum. I didn't say you were 100% scum and I didn't even vote you.
-norbearbear
Additional proof of scum claiming.In post 546, Lukewarm wrote:In post 513, Angel Warriors wrote:But we have not SRed him in a while here so I dont see a valid reason for him to SR me hereNora: Luke is scum because he is reading me the opposite way that I am reading himIn post 540, Angel Warriors wrote:an interesting way to catch scum that isn't always correct. but scum LOVE to mirror town's reads on them. look what this scum is doing here.
Also Nora: Roden is scum because he is reading me the same way that I am reading him