I feel lukewarm about this push.In post 12, Seanzie wrote:VOTE: Alchemist21 no townie would ever subject the rest of town to this pun.
VOTE: Seanzie
I feel lukewarm about this push.In post 12, Seanzie wrote:VOTE: Alchemist21 no townie would ever subject the rest of town to this pun.
I'd do it.In post 115, T3 wrote:That's a 400iq strat that people don't do.In post 114, Alchemist21 wrote:What do you think of my idea that Seanzie may have been testing to see who would try defending/pocketing me?In post 112, Flubbernugget wrote:so I don't think seanzie is literally scumreading someone for posting more. I think they're trying to manufacture a push and doing it poorly. so the only thing they could shade alchemist for was "posting". seems like I'm right too, because in elaborating, they're now saying things that are just...wrongIn post 36, Umlaut wrote:A non-ridiculous reading is "there is something in Alchemist's posts that Seanzie didn't like and he's being coy about what exactly" and not "posting = bad," and I have a hard time believing the latter is really what you thought he meant even for a second.
More votes on Flub plz
That would leave 2 scum for the entire game if one town was in a neighborhood at the start of the game.In post 117, Alchemist21 wrote:This has been on my mind a bit, but have mods recently started putting info like this in their rulesets? This was an oddly specific detail to include and if there’s a neighborhood it means there’s a guaranteed scum in there.
Has to be. Otherwise the mod is confirming certain roles don't exist and that's just not cool in a normal game.In post 128, Gamma Emerald wrote:I had the sense to check on it, it's only valid for the start of the gameIn post 117, Alchemist21 wrote:This has been on my mind a bit, but have mods recently started putting info like this in their rulesets? This was an oddly specific detail to include and if there’s a neighborhood it means there’s a guaranteed scum in there.
I'm leaning Umlaut scum but I don't have any strong reads yet.In post 132, Alchemist21 wrote:But Titus since you’re here got any reads to share?
I do. I felt the same way Flubber did about the posts that got him in trouble.In post 163, Aristeia wrote:Does anyone think Flubber is townie?
I had the same thought. I get the feeling Ari might need to give me a cookie.In post 171, Lukewarm wrote:Datisis feels town to me.
Now that Flubber has explained more, I think their thought process seems genuine, even thought I disagree with their conclusions.
I am not liking that Aristeia keeps asking other people before she votes/unvotes, like she is absolving herself of her votes.
VOTE: Aristeia
I don't get the Umlaut townread.In post 184, Aristeia wrote:Close to My Heart: Datisi
Beneath the Sky: Lukewarm, Umlaut, Seanzie
Sea of Dreams: Gamma Emerald, Titus, T3
Waves upon the Shore: ChaosOmega, Meg
The Long Winding Road: Alchemist, Flubber, Vulture
I absolutely disagree with this. Please provide evidence.In post 187, Aristeia wrote:Umlaut feels like he has purpose and direction that is going somewhere - he feels quite motivated to catch bad guys.
Tone right now. You don't feel right and the townreads on you make little sense, so I am pushing there.In post 205, Umlaut wrote:Titus, what are you actually scumreading about me? The way you're picking that alone out of all Aristeia's reads, you must feel pretty strongly about it.
This is vague. Town are looking to catch the bad guys. This is tantamount to saying Umlaut is town because he's town. It's circular.In post 187, Aristeia wrote:Umlaut feels like he has purpose and direction that is going somewhere - he feels quite motivated to catch bad guys.
I see this and feel like I couldn't keep you in jail even if I wanted to. This is bad trying to save yourself.In post 195, Aristeia wrote:I feel like I can trust you and you will protect me from all the evils in this world.
How about not?In post 199, Umlaut wrote:I preliminarily like Vulture for town but there's not enough there for a strong read.
Scum have agendas too and routinely ignore things that don't help their cause.In post 215, Aristeia wrote:He enters the thread and comments on thing he believes to be most suspicious, he doesn't waste time with commenting on things he does not care about.In post 204, Titus wrote:I absolutely disagree with this. Please provide evidence.
I find the clarity of purpose and focus to be townie.
YuckIn post 226, Alchemist21 wrote:Titus comes in and backs Flubbed up.In post 208, Flubbernugget wrote:looks like I'm mindmelding w/ titusIn post 204, Titus wrote:I absolutely disagree with this. Please provide evidence.In post 187, Aristeia wrote:Umlaut feels like he has purpose and direction that is going somewhere - he feels quite motivated to catch bad guys.
Flubber comes in and backs Titus up.
And both were for issues y’all were in the minority on. I don’t think 2 scum buddies would be this blatant with each other but it’s really feeling like at least one of you is scum.
VOTE: Flubber
Hmmm...townish hereIn post 241, Gamma Emerald wrote:anyone have questions for me?
If we're right, I am a total jerk, sorry not sorry.In post 289, T3 wrote:Oh, I know what's going on.In post 274, Gamma Emerald wrote:Before I post my reasons for TRing Aristeia, I have a bit of an odd question for Datisi:
Would you rather be a one-shot bulletproof or one-shot vigilante?
*facepalm* You have the subtlety of a jackhammer and that's coming from ME!In post 305, Gamma Emerald wrote:How so? The more you evade, the more I’ll be convinced of my own picture of the situation, and trust me, it wouldn’t be a good one for you.In post 302, T3 wrote:I shouldn't say.
I'm ok withIn post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
T3 literally metaed the fuck out of a lurker and I coasted on that to get town to a 3p lylo where I blew it but still I trust his metaIn post 344, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: T3In post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
You should know not to try this around me
The vote only comes off if a satisfactory explanation is given as to why and how this happened.
All the people above, please suggest my tier 2 townies tyiaIn post 388, Titus wrote:I'm ok withIn post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
Datisti Gamma T3 Lukewarm Flubber all being town.
The names I have listed are my locktowns.In post 394, Lukewarm wrote:I don't know what you are saying here, can you rephrase?In post 393, Titus wrote:All the people above, please suggest my tier 2 townies tyiaIn post 388, Titus wrote:I'm ok withIn post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
Datisti Gamma T3 Lukewarm Flubber all being town.
Relatable opinion. If there was a choice between those two, I'd see your point. It's Flubber v Meg though and a scum vote is better than a town one.In post 398, Lukewarm wrote:I have a strong preference to a Chaos > Meg elim day 1.
I think that they are both about equally scummy, but Meg having actually no opinions in thread means that we don't get any associatives from a Meg flip.
Who said we must use all the time? Limit crumb potential and spam.In post 401, Lukewarm wrote:We still have over a week on the dead line, so I am not really ready to compromise vote
I have an aversion to pagetops.In post 404, Lukewarm wrote:
I must say that the fact that we are all losing to the mod is a bit sad... smh
Spoiler:
Should have said poisonous or extremely unhealthy. Toxic implies they wreck the game and that's not what I was going for.In post 408, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 389, Titus wrote:T3 literally metaed the fuck out of a lurker and I coasted on that to get town to a 3p lylo where I blew it but still I trust his metaIn post 344, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: T3In post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
You should know not to try this around me
The vote only comes off if a satisfactory explanation is given as to why and how this happened.Toxic how?In post 397, Titus wrote:I am reluctant but ok with no Umlaut today. Ari I'd vote those toxic posts away.
Alright.In post 411, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also would add Alchemist to the D1 pass group, looking over Luke’s list
Deco, your dying post on D2 before being nightkilled was Wheme was meta town.In post 415, T3 wrote:What game was that?In post 389, Titus wrote:T3 literally metaed the fuck out of a lurker and I coasted on that to get town to a 3p lylo where I blew it but still I trust his metaIn post 344, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: T3In post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
You should know not to try this around me
The vote only comes off if a satisfactory explanation is given as to why and how this happened.
When he read the intro the same way I did, he became locktown to me. I have never had that with scum.In post 416, Datisi wrote:In post 388, Titus wrote:Datisti Gamma T3 Lukewarm Flubber all being town.uh. usually i would comment on the another iteration of my name, but this is more interesting - how do you have flubber as *locktown*? i'd understand being townie on him, but locktown?In post 395, Titus wrote:The names I have listed are my locktowns.
My bad Battle for CalculasiaIn post 422, T3 wrote:uhIn post 419, Titus wrote:Deco, your dying post on D2 before being nightkilled was Wheme was meta town.In post 415, T3 wrote:What game was that?In post 389, Titus wrote:T3 literally metaed the fuck out of a lurker and I coasted on that to get town to a 3p lylo where I blew it but still I trust his metaIn post 344, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: T3In post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
You should know not to try this around me
The vote only comes off if a satisfactory explanation is given as to why and how this happened.
wat?
Deco I was limmed Day 3 andWheme wasn't in the game.
Gee thanks. Nice to see you too.In post 476, MathBlade wrote:So pretty much from this post alone Flubber is probably TvT.In post 74, Titus wrote:I actually mindmelded with Flubber but I take things very literally. So I am guessing that there's a tonal aspect to things.
I feel Umlaut flips scum here though.
VOTE: Umlaut
Happy Birthday. Sorry you got a red pm for it.
Titus saw a bit of herself in Flubber and is reacting emotionally in the moment rather than a strategic play.
Which also makes her read on Umlaut likely utter garbage.
It's a theory I can roll with. Right now, I am willing to vote anyone not in my townblock.In post 480, MathBlade wrote:Nice to see you too.In post 477, Titus wrote:Gee thanks. Nice to see you too.In post 476, MathBlade wrote:So pretty much from this post alone Flubber is probably TvT.In post 74, Titus wrote:I actually mindmelded with Flubber but I take things very literally. So I am guessing that there's a tonal aspect to things.
I feel Umlaut flips scum here though.
VOTE: Umlaut
Happy Birthday. Sorry you got a red pm for it.
Titus saw a bit of herself in Flubber and is reacting emotionally in the moment rather than a strategic play.
Which also makes her read on Umlaut likely utter garbage.
Sorry I just woke up and probably could have wordsmithed that better but yeah that Umlaut vote is weird at best.
What do you make of my chaos/Alch/Aristeia theory?
Why didn't you consider that I'm mindfucking you to look for things that don't exist so I have pointless content to engage with or I post while spamming to hide my partner's scumslip?In post 489, MathBlade wrote:Not any more it doesn’t. Assuming you’re town, you have just told scum there’s something to look for so there’s nothing to obfuscate unless you’re wrong. So I hereby say you’re wrong and there’s nothing to look for. Or you could have just let me continue my regular catch-up which sometimes buries things.In post 487, Titus wrote:Either, we end this day in a hurry or we use a lot of words to say nothing. Stuff needs to be obfuscated.
In post 499, MathBlade wrote:1>Because your reads so far seem to be emotionally based crap.In post 497, Titus wrote:Well, if you're townreading me, why don't you trust me that all my babies need protecting?
2> Just because you see something doesn’t mean scum will. Calling attention to something existing just makes scum hunt for it. Best to just not talk about it and hope it goes away.
Pedit:
Hi. I think you’re scum care to convince me you’re not?
Because Starwars is great. Long love the society. Especially an overjoyed run of making bread of sausages. Specially 10 leaves.In post 562, MathBlade wrote:My main other reason to townread her involves things we shouldn’t talk about so I guess because Star Wars?
I don't mind a FoS or two, as long as my townreads live. I can play crazy.In post 560, Datisi wrote:all i saw earlier was "titus has had bad reads so they can be tvt", i hadn't seen Actual Reasons for her to be town, but to be fair i have been skimming a lot too so
Parker can secure the prize.In post 567, Titus wrote:Because Starwars is great. Long love the society. Especially an overjoyed run of making bread of sausages. Specially 10 leaves.In post 562, MathBlade wrote:My main other reason to townread her involves things we shouldn’t talk about so I guess because Star Wars?
Pirate Mollie would agree.In post 565, Alchemist21 wrote:This always the best reason to do anything.In post 562, MathBlade wrote:because Star Wars?
I have the forks.In post 571, MathBlade wrote:You realize I am a horrible Sophie when town right?In post 569, Titus wrote:Parker can secure the prize.In post 567, Titus wrote:Because Starwars is great. Long love the society. Especially an overjoyed run of making bread of sausages. Specially 10 leaves.In post 562, MathBlade wrote:My main other reason to townread her involves things we shouldn’t talk about so I guess because Star Wars?
Go be Sophie.
Ugh why couldn’t I be Hardison?
Let’s just hope I don’t fork this up.
I'm not sure who is scum. I'm content with everyone in my pool fighting each other.In post 573, MathBlade wrote:Besides Umlaut (who you’ve repeated is scum repeatedly) who do you have a scumread on and why?
If scum kill me tonight, there will be solid evidence of what I did and my reads.In post 575, MathBlade wrote:See here’s the situation I am in. Assume scum kill you tonight, then you have left nothing really tangible to go towards. If you’re flash wagoned right now (which I disagree with) your ISO is pretty lacking. You’re asking me to already play in a way more your style here and I am taking it on a leap of faith you’re not setting me up for failure here don’t make it hard for me.
Please help me find the last few locktown to solve this game.In post 747, Prism wrote:I might be setting the bar too low for Aristeia town but either way it's time to do something else.
Going to try reading ISOs working Meg -> Datisi -> probably Chaos unless I strike something in the meantime? I might swap to cover-to-cover but I really don't want to.
That's the problem. Town Chaos is more leadery or tries to be.In post 757, Umlaut wrote:Give me the tl;dr on Chaos? (I realize this is kind of a silly phrasing given Chaos has all of 6 posts but you know what I mean)
In post 765, Prism wrote:UNVOTE:
Probably going to go Chaos -> Gamma -> read whole game. Will be shocked if I don't have hardreads on Lukewarm/Vulture/Gamma by the end of it.