You weren’t first though, T3 was
VOTE: Seanzie
Lim all Liars
I’ve been alrightIn post 15, Alchemist21 wrote:How have you been? It's been a while.
What about it was scummy?
Welp my vote is serious nowIn post 38, Seanzie wrote:In post 37, Alchemist21 wrote:Except I definitely entered with a joke and an RVS.In post 34, Seanzie wrote:Good question. Instead of entering with jokes or RVS, Alchemist seems to want to be friends with everyone.
Um, pretty serious?In post 46, Aristeia wrote:How serious are you right now?In post 44, Gamma Emerald wrote:Welp my vote is serious now
noIn post 69, T3 wrote:Let me have bad reads in peace.In post 68, Datisi wrote:while it's far from the first time i get some suspicion my way for my tone of speaking, i do kind of expect better from someone who's already played a few games with me.
You seem like you’re spouting bs mateIn post 77, T3 wrote:I already responded to this. Also, I think Titus's 'mindmeld' is towny.In post 76, Datisi wrote:VOTE: t3In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
In post 60, T3 wrote:The weird mindmeld dancing around on umlaut.In post 59, Datisi wrote:you're free to elaborate.
This doesn’t mesh imoIn post 77, T3 wrote:I already responded to this. Also, I think Titus's 'mindmeld' is towny.In post 76, Datisi wrote:VOTE: t3In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
well, it wasn't an RVS vote anymore, but like, I'd consider myself a silly personIn post 110, Aristeia wrote:"welp"
and
"my vote is serious now"
feel like dissonance to me.
so I'm asking for a clarification on how serious you feel about this.
I had the sense to check on it, it's only valid for the start of the gameIn post 117, Alchemist21 wrote:This has been on my mind a bit, but have mods recently started putting info like this in their rulesets? This was an oddly specific detail to include and if there’s a neighborhood it means there’s a guaranteed scum in there.
2 scum + a traitor?In post 129, Titus wrote:That would leave 2 scum for the entire game if one town was in a neighborhood at the start of the game.In post 117, Alchemist21 wrote:This has been on my mind a bit, but have mods recently started putting info like this in their rulesets? This was an oddly specific detail to include and if there’s a neighborhood it means there’s a guaranteed scum in there.
I think you just got disprovenIn post 115, T3 wrote:That's a 400iq strat that people don't do.In post 114, Alchemist21 wrote:What do you think of my idea that Seanzie may have been testing to see who would try defending/pocketing me?In post 112, Flubbernugget wrote:so I don't think seanzie is literally scumreading someone for posting more. I think they're trying to manufacture a push and doing it poorly. so the only thing they could shade alchemist for was "posting". seems like I'm right too, because in elaborating, they're now saying things that are just...wrongIn post 36, Umlaut wrote:A non-ridiculous reading is "there is something in Alchemist's posts that Seanzie didn't like and he's being coy about what exactly" and not "posting = bad," and I have a hard time believing the latter is really what you thought he meant even for a second.
More votes on Flub plz
secondedIn post 159, Seanzie wrote:In post 158, Vulture wrote:Meh.
Bad opening, and the few posts that follow feel like he’s trying to put on anoutraged “you guys don’t see this!?”act with everyone.Why is this scummy in your opinion? I often get frustrated when I feel like I see something and others aren't paying attention.
I can see thisIn post 160, Titus wrote:I feel like Vulture is swooping in like a Vulture
hrmIn post 192, Aristeia wrote:I imagine he'd be more restrained rather than just randomly blurting things out.
I'm going to pretend you have no doubts about me because I'm not sure my gentle heart could handle it.
I think I might know who you are, but I’ll keep your secret if you want.In post 195, Aristeia wrote:I get somewhat anxious when I play these types of games and when I read your first post and saw that winking face, a sense of warmth just washed over me and I felt so safe in that moment.
I feel like I can trust you and you will protect me from all the evils in this world.
Am I wrong?
If I have something substantial on that subject I willIn post 210, Datisi wrote:gamma, use your words please
I don’t think Aristeia is that personIn post 202, Titus wrote:I had the same thought. I get the feeling Ari might need to give me a cookie.In post 171, Lukewarm wrote:Datisis feels town to me.
Now that Flubber has explained more, I think their thought process seems genuine, even thought I disagree with their conclusions.
I am not liking that Aristeia keeps asking other people before she votes/unvotes, like she is absolving herself of her votes.
VOTE: Aristeia
Announcing I’m thinking about that subject?
So I think I can elaborate what I was thinkingIn post 212, Gamma Emerald wrote:If I have something substantial on that subject I willIn post 210, Datisi wrote:gamma, use your words please
I think Aristeia is probably townIn post 245, Alchemist21 wrote:You could start one of your own. Any reads you feel really strongly about?In post 244, Gamma Emerald wrote:this entire page kinda
I don't feel like any of the topics being discussed are ones I can really add valuable input to
in general I think her approach is town, and if I'm right about who she is I'd probably be thrice as sureIn post 249, Alchemist21 wrote:Ok. Can you go into detail about why?In post 248, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think Aristeia is probably townIn post 245, Alchemist21 wrote:You could start one of your own. Any reads you feel really strongly about?In post 244, Gamma Emerald wrote:this entire page kinda
I don't feel like any of the topics being discussed are ones I can really add valuable input to
not as much as saying "I am on this wagon for xyz reasoning"In post 261, ChaosOmega wrote:Is my vote not a comment on what I think of the wagon?
Is there a way you can put your point here that isn't written out as a question?In post 261, ChaosOmega wrote:If everyone is jumping off, why would I be so desperate as scum to keep on here? Wouldn't this draw attention to me as it has?
In post 110, Aristeia wrote:"welp"
and
"my vote is serious now"
feel like dissonance to me.
so I'm asking for a clarification on how serious you feel about this.
Both of these posts feel like real attempts to reach out to me + LukewarmIn post 180, Aristeia wrote:In post 173, Lukewarm wrote:Doesn't mean I am willing to let them just avoid having any reads of their own
what would you like to talk about?
This post I feel like is town because despite having a lot of text that feels flowery, when I think about it, the post content feels pretty grounded in the context of the game. Here’s where my question to Datisi comes in, because I’mIn post 195, Aristeia wrote:I get somewhat anxious when I play these types of games and when I read your first post and saw that winking face, a sense of warmth just washed over me and I felt so safe in that moment.
I feel like I can trust you and you will protect me from all the evils in this world.
Am I wrong?
Oh do you now?In post 289, T3 wrote:Oh, I know what's going on.In post 274, Gamma Emerald wrote:Before I post my reasons for TRing Aristeia, I have a bit of an odd question for Datisi:
Would you rather be a one-shot bulletproof or one-shot vigilante?
How so? The more you evade, the more I’ll be convinced of my own picture of the situation, and trust me, it wouldn’t be a good one for you.In post 302, T3 wrote:I shouldn't say.
You thought it had importance once, now let the rest of us decide.In post 311, T3 wrote:So I think what I thought was going on is not going on and is something completely different that doesn't involve this game at all.
First off: why do you say Titus isn’t getting limmed today? Second, while moving your vote too much can result in the vote meaning less, I think not moving it can be as much of a problem. It makes it hard to trust that what is said matches what is done.In post 332, MegAzumarill wrote:Yep, like I said that was shortly after I had first read through the game, and I am a firm believer in having someone voted at all times (except limlo and similar scenarios) because it can generate discussion (which it already has) titus doesn't really have a chance of being limmed today anyway so why would I move it? In the end it is at worst pointless.
VOTE: T3In post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
I’ll believe it, but I’d like to see some trace of it before I move my voteIn post 348, T3 wrote:istg i had a wall on this and it was my first wall i've ever posted and my internet crashed as i was submitting itIn post 344, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: T3In post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
You should know not to try this around me
The vote only comes off if a satisfactory explanation is given as to why and how this happened.
This also tracks I thinkIn post 350, T3 wrote:jBasically, I either am a role that Gamma mentioned, or am a role that implies one of the roles Gamma mentioned, or I know by some mechanism through other players breadcrumbing or me being informed at the start. I thought Gamma was breadcrumbing or something of the sort, so I wanted to give him indication I was aware of what he was talking about. I then flipped to the next page and found a completely different explanation than what I was expecting.In post 338, Alchemist21 wrote:I don’t like this answer. You were wrong about what you saw but you still won’t explain what you were thinking this Day phase?In post 328, T3 wrote:After some flips.In post 326, Alchemist21 wrote:How much longer is later exactly?In post 323, T3 wrote:It will become clear later.In post 320, Gamma Emerald wrote:You thought it had importance once, now let the rest of us decide.In post 311, T3 wrote:So I think what I thought was going on is not going on and is something completely different that doesn't involve this game at all.
VOTE: T3
k?
I’ve seen T3!scum do something like this, I don’t think is itIn post 354, Alchemist21 wrote:It’s the only acceptable answer he could have given, but to call attention to the post then try to sweep it under the rug instead of giving their thoughts looked more like scum going “shit I fucked up and this looks bad, let’s hope they forget about it and it goes away.”In post 351, Datisi wrote:it was pretty obvious that t3 was trying to get out of having to say something about mech and i'm hmm at alchemist trying to force the issue >_>
i still wanna see the wall on my meta, though.
Than in a scum gameIn post 357, Alchemist21 wrote:Are you saying he’s acting less shady now than in a previous Town game?In post 356, Gamma Emerald wrote:This also tracks I thinkIn post 350, T3 wrote:jBasically, I either am a role that Gamma mentioned, or am a role that implies one of the roles Gamma mentioned, or I know by some mechanism through other players breadcrumbing or me being informed at the start. I thought Gamma was breadcrumbing or something of the sort, so I wanted to give him indication I was aware of what he was talking about. I then flipped to the next page and found a completely different explanation than what I was expecting.In post 338, Alchemist21 wrote:I don’t like this answer. You were wrong about what you saw but you still won’t explain what you were thinking this Day phase?In post 328, T3 wrote:After some flips.In post 326, Alchemist21 wrote:How much longer is later exactly?In post 323, T3 wrote:It will become clear later.In post 320, Gamma Emerald wrote:You thought it had importance once, now let the rest of us decide.In post 311, T3 wrote:So I think what I thought was going on is not going on and is something completely different that doesn't involve this game at all.
VOTE: T3
k?
It kinda feels like how he acted in Mini 2213, but less shady, as ludicrous as it seems
Yup, and the one time I’ve seen scum actually seemingly put in an effort, it was clearly a load of bunkIn post 374, Alchemist21 wrote:I agree with you, scum very rarely metadive anyone because they have no need to and don’t feel like spending the energy reading other games.In post 372, Datisi wrote:still shelfing this as Town For Effort for now because idk why scum!t3 does this. i feel like i've heard somewhere that scum!t3 likes to do townreads on townies but this feels a bit unnecessary. idk.
There was one time he gave a partner a townread but it was for “meta reasons” which was why the unexplained Datisi meta TR made me insta-vote himIn post 378, Lukewarm wrote:The town read thing I think is more that Scum!T3 just does not give his partners town reads. In the 4 or so t3 scum games I have looked at, the best his partners have ever gotten was null I believe.In post 372, Datisi wrote:still shelfing this as Town For Effort for now because idk why scum!t3 does this. i feel like i've heard somewhere that scum!t3 likes to do townreads on townies but this feels a bit unnecessary. idk.
But yeah, I cannot imagine scum!T3 going to this much effort to make a town read, when he could just as easily just call you a gut town read, or agree with my reasons that I just gave, or come up with something else from this game. Digging into 3 of your past games and counting the number of times you quote people in each seems like a lot of wasted effort for scum!T3.
In post 389, Titus wrote:T3 literally metaed the fuck out of a lurker and I coasted on that to get town to a 3p lylo where I blew it but still I trust his metaIn post 344, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: T3In post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
You should know not to try this around me
The vote only comes off if a satisfactory explanation is given as to why and how this happened.
Toxic how?In post 397, Titus wrote:I am reluctant but ok with no Umlaut today. Ari I'd vote those toxic posts away.
I also think Aristeia should be in the not-elimming pool for todayIn post 393, Titus wrote:All the people above, please suggest my tier 2 townies tyiaIn post 388, Titus wrote:I'm ok withIn post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
Datisti Gamma T3 Lukewarm Flubber all being town.