In post 112, The Emperor wrote:What's the point of ingredients? Am I missing something?
In post 8, lilith2013 wrote:just to induce maximum confusion?
In post 112, The Emperor wrote:What's the point of ingredients? Am I missing something?
In post 8, lilith2013 wrote:just to induce maximum confusion?
How would it have been a towntell?In post 111, Green Cap Boys wrote:Thought that might've been a towntell. Disappointing.
Are you taking Bingle as the authority on this? All I wanted was to share my opinion, which should be given the same weight as anyone else's.In post 173, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Ok, Bingle already said this earlier.
You seem like you really want to hammer that point across.
You... you have played with me before, right?In post 178, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Scummy post was scummy.
Yeah, that's about the kind of thing I expected. I get accused of it all the time, as both alignments. If I think something isn't towny, I will say it isn't towny, regardless of my alignment. And I don't ever do it tactically as scum, for the simple reason that nobody ever listens to me anyway.In post 183, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Seemed like you were trying really hard to make people not townread me.
I'm sorry that it happened to be related to you. It was really just me searching for anything to comment on.In post 190, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Who said they would need to be panicky? It just felt sinister to me.
Called out for it as both alignments, always spuriously. So it is in fact not a good reason.In post 200, NorwegianboyEE wrote:A: It's not an valid reason to scumread someone. (When S_S has himself said he get's called out for this often)
Well, I don't understand what Dwlee would expect to gain by giving the appearance of engaging uselessly.In post 263, Green Cap Boys wrote:I never used the word "useful".
In post 319, mastina wrote:I have read it and I still think that Bingle is scumclaiming for a very specific reason that I shall not elaborate on until Bingle elaborates on the details of his role PM.
This is getting out of hand. Now there are two of them!In post 374, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Again, i'm not wanting to share the info yet. But i feel like Bingle said something that's very ++scum.
I mean, it's bizarre to say that you are the authority on it, but that's what Norwee seemed to be implying. So I don't see what's weird about the question.In post 416, Bingle wrote:The you in 341 was Norwee, for context. SS was asking Norwee if I'm the authority on whether Norwee townslipped, which frankly seems bizarre to me.
?? who are youIn post 524, The Emperor wrote:Also, lilith's seeming disinterest this game is worrying, I'm used tomorefrom her
Maybe, but that post was being secretive wrt mechanics, not reads...In post 478, T3 wrote:Secretiveness with reads is almost always towny.
In fairness, I never do anything.In post 488, T3 wrote:Both heads apear to be here but are just doing nothing.
I would definitely be more comfortable with the former. In my experience T3 tends to make equally good points as both alignments, I think?In post 491, Bingle wrote:I'm not sure if I'm liking T3 because he's town, or because he's saying all the things I'm saying.
Yep, nice to meet you.In post 503, T3 wrote:All of your posts feel weird to me. Like you're choosing to talk about things that matter very little.
Hmm I think I can see T3 town. This doesn't feel like Guardians!T3.In post 511, T3 wrote:As of page 14 I've disagreed with all of Fairy's reads. .-.
Sorry if that was unclear. I was specifically referring to the two people I complained about in 379 who said "Bingle is scum but I won't say why until later".In post 523, The Emperor wrote:This feels out of place. Not sure why -S is saying this if he hasn't engaged or questioned me about the earlier reasons (335 354) I gave on Bingle. This implies there aren't any in the thread
But it's an open setup and it's literally impossible for him to be mech scum. So either mastina has some brilliant logic that nobody else saw, or she's mistaken (or scum), and we're not going to figure out which until she explains it.In post 551, T3 wrote:Usually when someone says someone else is mech scum it's best not to make them elaborate.
I mean, it is objectively true, as far as it goes. If you've already seen hydra dissonance be townread, it's the easiest thing in the world to pretend to do.In post 555, Fairy Circle wrote:This is absolutely awful and I pray Momcinda resolves her tech issues soon so that we may take a united stance upon this.
Oh, for crying out loud. Disagreeing with one read on you is not an "awful assault". Norwee doesn't know you well enough to know if fake dissonance is a good tacticIn post 566, Fairy Circle wrote:That I can see your awful assault upon is is based upon false dissonance and the absence of Momcinda.
ha.In post 571, Green Cap Boys wrote:would love to see more Actual content from s_s
I think we are on the same page, then. I certainly don't think your dissonance is scum indicative. (And I believe Norwee also feels that way?)In post 586, Fairy Circle wrote:Nobody knows how myself and Momcinda operate in a hydra pair - so yes, that cannot be read, and the dissonance is NAI.
I donut know. I am happy that you stood up for me on my entrance, but I'm not sure you would know how bad that could have gotten if nobody had, so I can't give you that many points for it.In post 588, Green Cap Boys wrote:right. boring question first - feelings on my slot?
It makes me want to townread you for reasons that are kinda hard to explain. Maybe just that I can understand how you came to the conclusion you did, it feels pretty organic?In post 628, Titus wrote:What do you think of my hero solve?
Well, I said I had a mild townread on T3; the post I quoted seems like a town thought that scum-T3 might not think to say.
Why do you have an issue with dwlee here (which I think is a valid concern and am fine with the line of questioning) but you have no issue with mastina being entirely opaque about her scumread on bingle?In post 652, Titus wrote:Vague statements aren't good enough given you have virtually no content until now. How did you form this read? Hoping we fill in blanks after you suggest an answer is no bueno.In post 651, Dwlee99 wrote:I've decided upon return that if you read t3 ISO you will understand what I mean by sorty.
her reasoning wasn’t clear to me and in fact she has refused to elaborate even after multiple people asked. do you have a post where you saw her say this?In post 619, Titus wrote:mastina's reasoning is pretty clear. By claiming no potions, Bingle is free to shoot who he wants. I'm not sure I agree but it feels like town mastina.In post 531, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:mastina still hasn't explained why bingle scumclaimed even after multiple people have asked so that's what I'm assuming it is, and it's a bullshit reason.
so basically damned if I do, damned if I don’t. when I’m not posting because I have no spoons, I’m called out as “not trying hard enough” or “being absent.” but if I force myself to post when I have no spoons, you think it’s scummy because I’m upset that I feel like I’m being forced to post when I don’t have anything useful to say. cool. bye.In post 571, Green Cap Boys wrote:still not loving the s_s/lilith hydra, lilith's jump on page 22 in feels like scum annoyed that they're being pushed. and would love to see more Actual content from s_s.
She never said anything about the scumclaim being due to claiming no potions. Where did you get this from?In post 313, mastina wrote:Oh you have ingredients in your role PM?In post 101, Bingle wrote:I have at least one ingredient I wouldn’t mind giving to basically anyone. It is not mayonnaise.
VOTE: Bingle
Pretty sure that's a scumclaim from Bingle.
also please answer thisIn post 657, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:Why do you have an issue with dwlee here (which I think is a valid concern and am fine with the line of questioning) but you have no issue with mastina being entirely opaque about her scumread on bingle?
This game. And no it isn'tIn post 655, Titus wrote:I can't really discuss this without knowing what you mean by guardians. Meta is crap.
We've played together more than that, though I think the only time you were town was DEFCON. Regardless, I guess saying you make equally good points is not totally accurate-- really what I meant was that you make good points as scum. I would assume if you can do that you can also make good points as town, though you were pretty exe-baity in DEFCON.In post 685, T3 wrote:I've played 1 game with you and that was us as scumpartners so uh I'm not sure where you're getting town!me makes equally good points unless you know I'm town this game.
Although secret alts exist.