Been a while since I actually played Mafia again, thanks for having me
VOTE: Titus
Your long wall post ain't gonna fool me!1!1!1!
You have a very interesting greeting, Mr. Greetings
Busy, understandable. still though.... your opening posts are off somehow....In post 35, GrandpaMo wrote:honestly i rlly honestly forgot about this game. im like running 5 games at a time, i dont recommend kek
five post in short succession, barely half is what I can consider "content" rest is filler, it might just be your style but it doesn't feel good for meIn post 44, GrandpaMo wrote:expand on that read?In post 43, AlwaysNever wrote:Busy, understandable. still though.... your opening posts are off somehow....
some people have posted more, and you're right, it's NAI, but I'll keep my other eye on you still.In post 53, GrandpaMo wrote: because i was in rvs?? you have to realize, that was my first couple of posts. i do this in every game. its nai.
Can you at least give some clearance over why I'm above dorsey or why Greeting is 'meh'?RCEnigma wrote:I'll be able to put some effort towards this game tomorrow or Tuesday morning the latest.
Thoughts with no further context:
Titus town
Grandpa iffy
Dorsey slightly townie
Alwaysnever slightly above dorsey
Greeting is meh
I had something about uhuh but immediately forgot what it was
Dew I've got nothing
that's semantics, he meant GrandpaMo, me and RCE probablyDorsey wrote:And who is "we"? You weren't here yet
If the vote's not serious you can really just unvote and call it RVS vote as you claim it is, the fact that you haven't and then keep coming at TL is definitely coming off as really sus right now.Dorsey wrote:At what point did the votes become serious? Especially if no serious reasoning was given? Not rhetorical.
might be because your post hasnt been that impactful yet, or an honest mistake reallyUhUhWaitAndSee wrote:I am missing?In post 67, TL The Legend wrote:also random gutreads:
grandpa mo is weird
dew is neutral
dorsey is probably the scummiest rn, but don't really wanna vote em yet (mostly bc i don't wanna omgus, but also because it's really early to put them at plur)
alwaysnever is pretty townie to meh, as is uhuh
titus is town.
finally, RCEnigma is neutral, but slightly town-leaning.
I am not answering for TL in any way, I am just pointing out how it is pointless to debate semantics, and I'm also pointing out that you haven't unvoted TL (even until now unless I missed it) and you really didn't reply at that here, curiousIn post 82, Dorsey wrote:@AlwaysNever
1. You answering for TL The Legend isn't valid for me. Also, the names you listed - their votes look random.
2. "Keep coming at TL" is an exaggeration and inaccuracy - I don't know if I can trust your judgement.
That is really not my intention if anything, I just want to point out what I feel about itIn post 85, TL The Legend wrote:Also Always Never, i agree with dorsey for once, you dont need to defend me or answer for me, I'm perfectly capable of holding my own. It's not like I'm getting voted off or anything, it's just a weird vote to mei keep almost using the l-word help i'm old
I don't like how you stress that you don't have the luxury of privileged information, if what I read is right this looks LAMIST to meIn post 99, Dorsey wrote:I think it's moreso about clarifying. I don't have the luxury of privileged information, which is why I ask a lot of questions about things that don't make sense (you can see that everything you quoted is a question, not an accusation). Also, my intent is to set town up for success in the instance I am eliminated by asking all the questions no one else seems interested in asking. I need the reasonings (or lack thereof) for my demise to be highlighted in stark contrast so the appropriate parties can be held accountable.
Again this smell like LAMIST to me, I don't know why you have to post this other than just trying to make yourself look as town as possibleIn post 100, Dorsey wrote:I'm doing my part.
I'm sorry that we can't see eye to eye yet, but thanks for the clarificationsIn post 108, RCEnigma wrote:I've moved you back to null actually.In post 58, AlwaysNever wrote:some people have posted more, and you're right, it's NAI, but I'll keep my other eye on you still.In post 53, GrandpaMo wrote: because i was in rvs?? you have to realize, that was my first couple of posts. i do this in every game. its nai.
UNVOTE: GrandpaMo
Now, now. I'm actually still waiting on A to Z's slot so that I can properly assess everyone, but we still have days until Day ends, so I don't mind waiting. I'll reveal my standing on y'all then
Can you at least give some clearance over why I'm above dorsey or why Greeting is 'meh'?RCEnigma wrote:I'll be able to put some effort towards this game tomorrow or Tuesday morning the latest.
Thoughts with no further context:
Titus town
Grandpa iffy
Dorsey slightly townie
Alwaysnever slightly above dorsey
Greeting is meh
I had something about uhuh but immediately forgot what it was
Dew I've got nothing
I thought your push against grandpa was promising but we didn't actually see the same thing. With that in mind I have to take the interaction at face value where I wasn't initially if that makes sense.
Greeting is meh because his vote on Titus is really weak but it doesn't definitely mean scum and I've got bigger fish to fry.
or its one SE and one newb and you're just posting this to throw the scent off of youIn post 110, RCEnigma wrote:SEs being on the top of most readslists + not being engaged as suspects from the beginning makes me think 2 newbies make up the scumteam.
Just a random thought.
the fact that you of all people are saying this... really considering taking you off my scumlean and putting you back to null now.In post 115, GrandpaMo wrote:please read before taken words out of context. and also dorsey wtf do u not understand about this .. its just a simple basic read that i wanted to start for discussion so far you have been very keen on potraying like im scumalligned with either or, which i have not pushed either one u. im not even targetring that read at you specifically nor at them. its a general read. u might be scum being paranoid due to this and scared that i was scumreading u lolIn post 54, GrandpaMo wrote:i am saying there is one scum between because of how the interaction initiated. i am saying you are never alligned here. so one is either town or scum. and no dew can still be town here -- it doesn't matter who initiated the conversation. yes it was an rvs vote, but the way you questioned could be from a town pov or scum pov then how dew continued it in post 17 just further confirms that.In post 48, Dorsey wrote:And if you're saying there's '1 scum in between', which one is the scum? And how are you drawing this conclusion? And why would the scum not be Dew if she initiated the interaction?
GreetingIn post 138, AlwaysNever wrote:you know what, looking at the entirety of Dorsey's post again, I can really see that they're either pro scum trying to look town or have a defensive playstyle that just rustles my jimmies in the worst place, so cause the day is still so long I'll give Dorsey the benefit of the doubt and not vote them yet. If anything I really don't want to vote off a fellow noobie who's probably trying their best in their own way
extra point: I really like post 120 tho, but even though he shares the same suspicion I had on Dorsey, the vibe I feel from his post to vote Dorsey felt offIn post 139, AlwaysNever wrote:Also I was reading Greeting's post, and can't help but imagine it being narrated by twirly, mustached villain who's trying to play everyone lul.
hmmm I don't like thatIn post 154, TL The Legend wrote:And yes, I'm putting them at e-1. If you wanna hammer them, go ahead; they're more than likely scum anyway.
I don't know why you even reply like this, nobody really voted on Uhuh yet so there's no "wagon" per se, just vague feelings and readsIn post 151, Titus wrote:Looks lamisty. Why are you supposing you'll flip? Do you feel scum are on your wagon?In post 147, UhUhWaitAndSee wrote:Comes off a little strange. Why the comment so far from elimination?In post 143, Greeting wrote:I wonder what the reactions will be when I flip town, which I am.
I mean anyone quickhammering you right now would be probably yeeted just as quick next day anyway so you don't haftaIn post 162, Greeting wrote:I’m going to be petty and not claim anything.In post 155, Titus wrote:Icky.In post 154, TL The Legend wrote:And yes, I'm putting them at e-1. If you wanna hammer them, go ahead; they're more than likely scum anyway.
We wait for a claim before hammering. The theory is we don't want to flip a confirmable PR.
how can you yeet me if I already flip town whatIn post 165, RCEnigma wrote:Ifalways flips town then we yeet always/grandpa/tl/dewin not that particular order but it's 2/4 scum with 0 night action input. Even if we miselim D1 and d2 there's 2 scum left in the pool of 3.
On the other hand we could flip always first and if they flip red the last scum is in dew/Dorsey. Pretty confident grandpa would be town with that flip and always chainsawed them on the back of the non-aligned read.
yeah really man... if you guys have an RVS vote that you can't justify no more, please unvoteIn post 168, RCEnigma wrote:There were only 3 when it was originally posted? And one was an rvs vote in the first place.
No offense but it only seems edgier cause you're cutthroat with yer words and shades so I'm just matching your vibes. It rustles my "jimmies" cause I personally don't like that lol, so I'm taking a step back and reassessing things, that's why I clarify that I won't vote youIn post 180, Dorsey wrote:I feel like AlwaysNever's responses to everyone else in Post 137 was nice and placating, but edgier towards me. I don't know why responding to accusations (being "defensive"?) would 'rustle anyone's jimmies', and how can I be a pro anything when this is my second game? It just seems like a lot of extra for a guy I never addressed.
I don't know why GrandpaMo is so hell-bent to make me scum, first because Dew referenced my profile pic and now because Greeting is being opportunistic. And I don't know if Greeting being "petty" and not claiming is anti-town or if it's anti-game. Either way, I don't know what issues he's dealing with.
hmmm good to know, thanks for the explanationIn post 170, RCEnigma wrote:Meant greeting.
If you flip red then your push on grandpa becomes an alignment indicative association. Challenging grandpa on that read implicates one of Dorsey/dew since the intent to downplay the read is to discredit it. Which scum wouldn't have an incentive to if both were town. It makes grandpa town in that hypothetical world. He is as of right now in my Poe as I stated before.
That changes on certain flips being certain alignments so in general preflip associatives are not a good tool to build reads with.
In post 184, RCEnigma wrote:Is......is your partner someone else?In post 181, Dorsey wrote:And I don't like that RCEnigma is trying to make me scum with AlwaysNever, but the logic he put forth made sense.
What's the one Titus scumgame you're familiar with, for starters? I'm curious cause it's like she's somehow... restrained herself in her latest postsIn post 186, RCEnigma wrote:Fwiw Dorsey you're tied for my top town and honestly I will always have an asterisk next to Titus unless mechanically clear just because I know she has the potential to be very sneaky scum. As of right now she isn't playing to the scumgame I'm familiar with.
Oookay let me know when you do thenDorsey wrote:It's moreso I had stuff to say about them but nothing to say about you.
definitely not a call out to me huhDorsey wrote:But yes, we have a playstyle and personality difference. I have to defend a lot because people take pot shots because I post a lot and engage the easiest. It's more convenient for them to address me than to seek out the people who are lurking or who don't offer any opinions of their own.
sureIn post 195, Dorsey wrote:Didn't know I was cutthroat tho
But whyGreeting wrote:I have quite a lot of thoughts with regard attempt to vote me out, but I think I'll keep them to myself for the time being.
Ok thats fairIn post 200, Greeting wrote:It's too early for that.In post 199, AlwaysNever wrote:But whyGreeting wrote:I have quite a lot of thoughts with regard attempt to vote me out, but I think I'll keep them to myself for the time being.
I wanna know
I was expecting more but I guess that's kinda my fault lolTitus wrote:In post 173, Titus wrote:Plus the sass rarely comes from scum (could be coached but still).
hopefully notIn post 226, RCEnigma wrote:You're gonna get me nk'ed bud. Titus town. But if you want a game for reference off the top of my head Boon Warz has low effort Titus!scum for comparison.In post 196, AlwaysNever wrote:What's the one Titus scumgame you're familiar with, for starters? I'm curious cause it's like she's somehow... restrained herself in her latest posts
He did say he played in like... 5+ gamesIn post 251, Greeting wrote:What’s up with GrandpaMo? They make 15 posts in a row and then disappear for days.
Thanks man, hope you don't get NK'ed lulRCEnigma wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=79970
The boon Warz game I mentioned earlier with Titus!scum. It's the last time I played with Titus rolling red I believe?
Within prod range?In post 268, Dorsey wrote:-snip-
And okay, Always, I'm ready. I'd rather end the day while we're within prod range.
Your suspicion on Greetings are duly noted, Dorsey. Dunno why you have to vote but it is duly noted.
even uhuh has no explanation on his titus read... but also no explanation for me. I don't know what to think of that.UhUhWaitAndSee wrote:.[/color][/b]Second Reading Summary 15/09 (1st)
I think I have a better idea now that I have had a chance to reread all the posts. Below are all my reads.
Readings of note Read RCEnigma* Lean town Titus Null to Lean town Dorsey**, GrandpaMo**, AlwaysNever Null TL***, Greeting***, Dew**** Lean Scum
*Like the lines of inquiry. I am careful not to mistake SE experience with town alignment though.
**Odd playstyles. Don't know if this is AI or not but reads off to me. Dorsey's votes are erratic and they jumps at things too quickly, often without any explanation. GrandpaMo's seems to have this thing with hammering in theories hard without enough evidence.
***One of these. Rapid E-1 votes and context read this way.
****Dew is here because the low posting is now making me suspicious.
RCEnigma wrote:Consider this my intent to hammer TL by 9 p.m EST.
Last words and rituals should be spoken and danced by then.
RCEnigma wrote:Err actually let's not end day till deadline on account of the V/LAs
I am signing up to be your backup hammer, just in case you aren't there by the time deadline's comingRCEnigma wrote:if we stall the elim till deadline theres only a 1 day offset for the v/las. thats better for all involved.
what if TL is town?Greeting wrote:In post 293, Dorsey wrote:And, Greeting, you're a compromise because we have to get rid of someone and I'd rather get rid of you than TLThat’s not a compromise. It would be a compromise if you voted for TL. You voted for a second option (me) which had two votes until now. That is really scummy behaviour. If TL is voted out and is scum, I’m coming for you next.In post 294, Dorsey wrote:And you've both been at E-1, so I don't get where you're coming from.
been saying that and they end up doing so (they post it with this purple font, if you miss it), I still have a feeling that they might be but I usually wait until day 2 to really start sussing seemingly inactive people cause they're LHF until thenIn post 380, HockeyFan wrote:too much mechanics talk from UhUh and too little game-moving content. This is not AI but I do want to see some more content from uhuhwaitandsee(like asking questions, making reads, giving thoughts e.t.c)
I'll make note of this if you flip redIn post 381, HockeyFan wrote:Ok after reading Grandpa'a ISO one more fking time since its so god damm confusing, I am formally declaring him as a TL. This is a meta read since ive played with gpa a fair bit on other sites and this aligns with his town meta(dont let him fool u by saying his town meta is to be pro-town, cuz its not)
they said that they're more comfortable on elimming TL('s slot) now here on 337In post 385, Dorsey wrote:A to Z, blazehd, and TL the Legend (now HockeyFan) were all the same slot.
Does Titus still think HockeyFan is scum?
is that a softclaim thenIn post 314, Titus wrote:No. See bolded.In post 304, Greeting wrote:Is that a claim?In post 302, Titus wrote:I could still submit a night action,if I have one.Keeping up and remembering to post are the issues.
a brownie point for you, keeping my one eye on you stillIn post 311, Greeting wrote:You haven’t really left any hard clues as to whom you think is mafia. Someone before had characterised your playstyle as defensive, a statement I can agree with. Voting out a townie, as a principle, is not beneficial for town. TL did say that they strongly believe me being scum for some vaguely specified reason. If they’re town, they apparently are willing to sacrifice themselves to make their point. So, assuming that TL is scum and you are voted out Day Two, being town, what benefit would it bring?In post 310, Dorsey wrote:I answered your possibility with a possibility - I'm comfortable with the risk
Are you that paranoid of RCE being scum? I can agree with the other twoIn post 315, Dorsey wrote:[UhUhWaitAndSee/RCEnigma/Titus] I still think it's one of these
In post 323, Titus wrote:Feeling a bit uneasy about eliminating TL.
this quick change in opinion really warranted a reason cause.... huh? 3 post from Hockey and you're suddenly like, "I'm ok with this"? why though?In post 337, Titus wrote:Ok, I feel better about eliminating TL's slot.
it is very interesting that this is the same four people that Dorsey were focusing on, either by voting them or asking people on their opinion like on post 178In post 336, HockeyFan wrote:-snip-
Overall, I think theres at least 1 scum on this wagon(would say 2 but idt scum buddy up like this to get a mislim). I claim VT, idm getting voted out, u should probs look atGreeting/Titus/RCE/UhUhwhen I die imo
avoiding dorsey's question by pointing out gpa (thanks hockey that's a great nickname) is actually not being replaced. hmmmIn post 325, Titus wrote:GrandpaMo is not being replaced. See Mod post at the top of the page.
purely coincidentalIn post 360, Dorsey wrote:I was also looking back through some newbie games and it looks like at least one SE is always scum
dorsey you never answered thisIn post 332, RCEnigma wrote:.... Is your argument for Greeting over TL based on the fact greeting is defending themselves?
and looking at this post I can believe you're relieved cause you can focus on Hockey instead of actually answering that post lmaoIn post 339, Dorsey wrote:Thank God you're here
That's a fair assumptionIn post 430, GrandpaMo wrote:Lol you look like you fucked up in mafiachat and came to the thread to explain ur grief.In post 426, AlwaysNever wrote:That's.... weird. Was that nokill deliberate?
fwiw, mafia never no kills night 1
it gives them no advantage on doing so -- the only time it would be valid is only if they are setting up a later claim or future claim but still that is very high risk play low reward hence why mafia never goes for that play and rather no kill in later days.
Yeah it's getting really hard to excuse Dorsey's plays now, for me personally, but I wanna see what they have to say first before I put them on the list of people I'm voting todayIn post 457, RCEnigma wrote:The eod stuff I was talking about was Dorsey's vote shift onto hockey for the pocketing comment. It felt overblown even at the time but doesnt make sense at all. The only reason hockey went down there is we let deadline make a decision for us.
Dorsey could have easily voted kennyk, a slot that they have 0 strong opinion of vs a slot that they argued to be town in the 50/50 with greeting. If you think TL was the town in the 50/50 why would you settle for an eod elim on them over a slot you are having trouble reading anyway?
Dorsey pretty much lined up with every read hockey was coming out with and said ehhhh let's elim it anyway. Sketch.
But I'd rather talk to always right now. Do you want to talk about your softs yesterday?
no pocketing pleaseIn post 434, GrandpaMo wrote:ur my top townIn post 431, AlwaysNever wrote:That's a fair assumptionIn post 430, GrandpaMo wrote:Lol you look like you fucked up in mafiachat and came to the thread to explain ur grief.In post 426, AlwaysNever wrote:That's.... weird. Was that nokill deliberate?
fwiw, mafia never no kills night 1
it gives them no advantage on doing so -- the only time it would be valid is only if they are setting up a later claim or future claim but still that is very high risk play low reward hence why mafia never goes for that play and rather no kill in later days.
But yeah it is weird, I just want to point that out
Either way, we don't have anything to go on now, so it's like we're back at D1 again like RCE said lmao
Btw RCE, you said you have some eod things you want to discuss post flip, so is that still a thing or?
if JK jailed scum, wouldn't the other scum be able to do the attack anyway? or nah?Titus wrote:No wait, the JK could have jailed scum, my math is off completely
exactly....RCEnigma wrote:Hold off on JK outing just yet, we need to talk more about the setup. We can use it to our advantage. My first instinct is to keep jk unclaimed and they just crumb their n1 and at some point their n2. This keeps rolecop from making the kill since they need to hunt down JK.
Whoever the JK Target was can be ruled out as rolecop but can't be ruled out as scum fwiw.
or tracker, if the mafia no-kill, which is still possible but it is a questionable decision if they doTitus wrote:I'm a friendly neighbor.In post 455, GrandpaMo wrote:I don't know why you were so quick to assume that could have been jk >> I feel like you could be scum for pressuring a slot to out -- ur justification is still not completely justified due to confbias.
There was no nightkill.
The only protective with a friendly neighbor is a jailkeeper.
just gonna stop writing my post and clarify this first to say that those posts are made before titus-greeting PR reveal, so I wasn't aware of them yetIn post 478, UhUhWaitAndSee wrote:Weird comment, clearly we have more info than D1 re PRs.In post 431, AlwaysNever wrote:That's a fair assumptionIn post 430, GrandpaMo wrote:Lol you look like you fucked up in mafiachat and came to the thread to explain ur grief.In post 426, AlwaysNever wrote:That's.... weird. Was that nokill deliberate?
fwiw, mafia never no kills night 1
it gives them no advantage on doing so -- the only time it would be valid is only if they are setting up a later claim or future claim but still that is very high risk play low reward hence why mafia never goes for that play and rather no kill in later days.
But yeah it is weird, I just want to point that out
Either way, we don't have anything to go on now, so it's like we're back at D1 again like RCE said lmao
Btw RCE, you said you have some eod things you want to discuss post flip, so is that still a thing or?
I've said it before in post 138. I still think the same. Because I know that these thoughts are colored by my own biases, I took the liberty of reading your previous game (2075) and of course I see that you are the same there.In post 470, Dorsey wrote:Always - We're not at D1 again, we have a flip. Also, there's nothing to "excuse" about my play - what are your issues with it?
nah yeah it was coincidence, thank you for giving me ideas to soft Tracker next time I got one though. fwiw, wasn't jailed, otherwise I would probably not post like what Uhuh pointed out since then I would know the setup at that pointRCEnigma wrote:In post 388, AlwaysNever wrote:a brownie point for you, keeping my one eye on you stillIf they weren't specifically tracker softs I wouldn't necessarily press the issue. I think if the JK was on Always then it's worth outing since it would be a psuedo red check. If not then don't.In post 43, AlwaysNever wrote:I'll keep one eye on you at all times
As of right now I think if Dorsey flips red always is town. Walking home right now so once I get some time I'll give more thought to that.
I guess you can chalk it up to me being inexperienced? when there's no kill in the night my first instinct is that there's no info that we get since we only have HF flip at that momentIn post 486, UhUhWaitAndSee wrote:I can't post for much longer - but quick addresses.
GrandpaMo - would like to see more engagement with the game i.e understanding what is going on.
AlwaysNever - but still, especially because no deaths n1, town will in all likelihood have things to go off on once d2 gets rolling.
Is this a post to answer Dorsey??? Just wanna make sure cause you never explicitly refer to themUhUhWaitAndSee wrote:I think you have to accept this as my playstyle. You refer to it as active lurking - I don't think so, but either way its just a playstyle. I like to rely on hard game mechanics, especially with PR info. I have a penchant for statistics: have a look at https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=83092. On d1 scum is only eliminated +0.9% to random (town is lynched 4.7% less than random, the balance is no eliminations). All the other days, it's a lot more favored to eliminating scum than random. Why? Power roles and working out the mechanics. And working out how those mechanics relate to posts made on d1 - even though what is worked out on d1 might be tenuous.
Think of it like the way you or GrandpaMo play, which I find inherently suspicious (I've talked about this earlier). But I don't have a meta to compare it with, so I am hesitant to scum read it. If there are posts that relate to the developing mechanics that I can link back, then I can say that you are more likely to be town or more scum. Hence the emphasis on figuring out the mechanics in the first place.
I was half expecting someone to call me lamist for that but I am a bit confused about it, since I was used to a similar role that is mechanically quite different, so I just have to ask around and clarifyIn post 499, Titus wrote:Yes, but there would have been a successful nightkill. Scum have to pick who does the killing.In post 469, AlwaysNever wrote:if JK jailed scum, wouldn't the other scum be able to do the attack anyway? or nah?
Kinda think AlwaysNever is town for not getting this.
since you asked nicely....In post 541, RCEnigma wrote:besides greeting and titus, I want everyones next post to be a readslist. please thank you.
I'd rather give null reads than not giving reads at all, but if you want I can give elaborations on thatIn post 548, GrandpaMo wrote:what is this read.In post 542, AlwaysNever wrote:Gpa is confusing. Is he an aggressive town scumhunting the heck out of everybody? Is he scum trying to look like he's scumhunting so that's why he's aggressive? It seems like reading on some other games that this is what he usually plays, but he can really be the one I'm voting today, if not for...
and what is this readlist.
most of them are null reads.
He only said your readslist is bad, he didn't even call you dumb and stupid, what the f Dorsey. He even agreed with you about individually scumreading your pairings. This is the kind of things that makes me really wary of you. You put words in other people's posts that they didn't even write. Why are you doing this?Dorsey wrote:488
You want me to take a stance or are you commenting that I take too many stances???In post 544, Titus wrote:Not a fan of always never reads. Take stances.
I don't know why this is necessaryIn post 558, Dorsey wrote:Are some of you guys in primary school
Imagine that, what's the name of this game you're in again?In post 580, Dorsey wrote:I just wanted to know why so many mistakes were being made. And if they were intentional.
btw just wanna point out, it's kinda unfair to bring d1 wagon at this point cause your slot was kind of empty going to the end of d1, and so we have no info on how your slot going to vote on that wagon.In post 623, kennyk wrote:In post 621, Titus wrote:Hmm leaning kennykIf I take a look at what happened with a neutral view, those are the two names that would come to my mind. Let me explain you why:In post 622, AlwaysNever wrote:VOTE: Greeting
will post why after my class is over, but I've said on my reads that a certain flip of certain players would made me instantly scumlean him, and that Dorsey JK flip was one of those.
UhUh voted exactly once on day 1 an 2. On D1 the vote was on my slot and on D2 it was on Dorsey. Each time is was an early vote that was never changed. But what is most interesting about the voting is, UhUh was not on the train that eliminated TL/Hockey on D1. So one confirmed scum wasn't on it. I know it is not impossible, but how big are the chances, that no scum was on that train? I guess that those chances are low.
So who was on that train when the hammer fell? The votecount says kennyk, Greeting, GrandpaMo, Dorsey, RCEnigma. With Dorsey that leaves four possible suspects.
At the time Dorsey claimed, there were three votes on them: Greeting, UhUhWaitAndSee, kennyk. With UhUh now being confscum that leaves two votes that coincidently were on the Hockey-train as well: me and Greeting. The question is of mafia went on this train with all might to stop an UhUh elim or not. If so, it are those two names.
And as I know my role, for me this just leaves Greeting. So I would really like to go with him as I had him on my scumlean list yesterday. If you all agree to elim me first it is OK with me as long as you elim him tomorrow.
VOTE: Greeting
can you elaborate on why it is the most optimal? doesn't letting it no elim just makes the next day E-Lo and it became the game of "who can you pocket better"?In post 648, GrandpaMo wrote:also its just the most optimal mechancial play ^
In post 649, kennyk wrote:In post 647, GrandpaMo wrote:ok i think as just much as i want to condemn kennyk here, i think the best option for us is to always nc here, since we are in a world of evens.
especially in this playerlist, where no one is dead -- the mafia kill does actually give us info.
VOTE: SleepI like those posts. I thought that after Greetings flipped green I had handed over the whole game to scum with my theory. I was sure I was going to be quickly eliminated today. And that would have gotten us into a 2-1 night, 1-1 day --> game over for town.In post 648, GrandpaMo wrote:also its just the most optimal mechancial play ^
I really thought tha Greetings could have been the one. But what really strikes me as odd is the fact, that that wagon got through so fast. No one doubted my theory of both mafia being on the Dorsey train. This doesn't feel good. So I had my doubts about Grandpa and RCE as they followed me more or less blindly and very fast. And both were on the train that hammered Hockey D1. As stated I think it is highly unlikely, that no scum was on that one. But on the other hand it is also possible, that if UhUh and Always were the scum team (both newbies) they tried to avoid just that.
I am begining to feel really paranoid.
Vote for Grandpa who hammered? But he made the posts above. But what if he wanted to pocket someone with them? But then again, why would he need to? He could have just voted me as I put myself in the spotlight D3.
Vote RCE for hopping on my train so fast? But what if Always played it really slow?
I really can't make up my mind right now.
VOTE: no elimination
to be honest with you, I didn't regard your theory so much because I have my own theory on Greeting, but I see now that I was mistaking bad reads as being scummy, and I kinda felt bad about it.In post 650, kennyk wrote:I am always forgetting something.
I wanted to point out the fact, that strategically a no elim is giving town better chances than more or less randomly voting someone off. So that is a big part of my vote, too.
also yeah I forgot to reply on this, but thanks for explaining it to me. looking at this, I can see why we should no-elim, but I still stand on what I say about us talking the whole deadline instead of immediately no-elimming. the more time we spent talking, the more evidences we can bring to the last day, and the more chances that a scum slipped and reveal themselves, which I think would be beneficial to town, but maybe not beneficial to the mod's time sorry modIn post 655, kennyk wrote:I know I am answering for Grandpa here (he's too old to answer for himself ), but let's just have a look at the numbers:In post 653, AlwaysNever wrote:can you elaborate on why it is the most optimal? doesn't letting it no elim just makes the next day E-Lo and it became the game of "who can you pocket better"?In post 648, GrandpaMo wrote:also its just the most optimal mechancial play ^
We are E-Lo right now. We are 4 still alive with 1 scum, so it is 3-1. If we miselim, the night starts with 2-1 and ends with 1-1. No elim possible tomorrow and mafia wins.
If we no-elim today and scum kills tonight we are at 2-1 tomorrow. If we miselim than, it is also game over for town.
So from the point of every town player we today have a 33 % chance to hit the right target (as 2 of the other 3 players are town and would be miselim and one is the jackpot). By no-elim today and a nightkill the remaining two townies have a 50 % chance to hit the right one (math should be obvious).
Admittedly this is just the number crunshing if we had no further info from the game so far. But the feelings we get from other players have to be better than the 50 % in said mechanical play. I on my part don't have those feelings right now. So I am willing to do the gamble now.
I know there is the possibility, that scum thinks "Why should I make towns chances better?" after a no-elim today and that results in a no-kill next night leaving us where we are right now.
Concerning this scenario:
@mod:Is a "... and they lived happily ever after"-scenario possible? I couldn't find anything in your rules that forbids a draw.
if gpa is on and about to post here, I want you to explain what this means too, cause I can't get an angle on kenny and it's worrying me at this pointIn post 638, GrandpaMo wrote:fuck fuck fuck i just realized kenny fucking scumslipped LOL