Mini Normal 2236: Lemon Demon | Game Over!
Forum rules
Somebody said they don't see this as SvS?In post 358, Little Green Wheels wrote:Not a fan of not knowing how a catch-up read works.In post 334, ChaosOmega wrote:I can get down with some pressure here. Also not a fan of LGW, the push in 69 against SF feels off, talking about asking SF to ask Cakez for reasons for the N_M vote when N_M hasn't posted in the game yet, and 35 looks like rewording and reposting T3's 20 to fit in.
LGW barely cares to explain his push or defend themselves, as if they aren't really interested in convincing Chaos he's wrong. It feels awkward.
Add the quoted post where Chaos makes a case on LGW yet votes elsewhere into the mix, and I really like them for scumbuddies.
Only House was voting DGB when you voted them. Explain please.In post 402, ChaosOmega wrote:The amount of votes for them.
Hint, this makes t3 town if lgw flip red
They don't defend their buddy this way
As I said, he was not asked to provide a full elaborate list, just commit to some reads and share themAlchemist21 wrote:Yes, but besides that people are holding him to standards I haven’t seen anyone held to in years. “OMG NO FULL READSLIST IS SCUMMY” in 2 rl days is nothing, and 626 from Not Mafia is just a shitty jump-on.
I'm sure you've played with n_m before...
I don't know why you're defending Cakez here
Right.Alchemist21 wrote:I just told you I do, and this stupid pile on isn’t going to do anything to produce AI content, it’s just going to frustrate him.In post 636, Wisdom wrote:unless you have a townread on them.
How about the pile that actually matters? Do you like the reasons people have given for being on LGW?
Is it a scummy push or just bad?In post 643, Little Green Wheels wrote:I don't give a shit, when I see a bad push I'm going to call it out.In post 638, Wisdom wrote:And there's LGW parroting Alch's defense
Don't you have bigger problems than that, LGW? You're effectively at E-1
I wanna know if by "bad push" you're calling Shrek scum here or if you're saying your goal in this game is to call out bad plays instead of hunting scumIn post 649, Little Green Wheels wrote:You wanna define your premise?In post 645, Wisdom wrote:Is it a scummy push or just bad?In post 643, Little Green Wheels wrote:I don't give a shit, when I see a bad push I'm going to call it out.In post 638, Wisdom wrote:And there's LGW parroting Alch's defense
Don't you have bigger problems than that, LGW? You're effectively at E-1
And now that you realized? How do you feel about the people on the wagon? Clearly you like commenting on pilesIn post 647, Alchemist21 wrote:I didn’t even realize LGW had so many votes until you said something. Before people tried to tie LGW and Cakez I don’t remember any reason for LGW scum other than bad vibes.In post 641, Wisdom wrote:Right.Alchemist21 wrote:I just told you I do, and this stupid pile on isn’t going to do anything to produce AI content, it’s just going to frustrate him.In post 636, Wisdom wrote:unless you have a townread on them.
How about the pile that actually matters? Do you like the reasons people have given for being on LGW?