sad for you I guess, as a consolation prize I'll give you a VOTE: Galron
for the phonetically challenged, the "thyn" sounds like thin
sad for you I guess, as a consolation prize I'll give you a VOTE: Galron
past games, did the the strat ever work? it sounds like it would out the tracker for a 2/3 chance of being NKdIn post 24, Roden wrote:Unfortunately I know exactly what Cook is doing, which means this is gonna be another weird newbie game.
Cook doing this strat as scum:
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p12928402
T3 copying the strat as town:
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=87394
..and we get to E-1 on page 3 - darby did you know that spangled was at E-2 before you voted him?In post 59, DArby wrote:VOTE: SpangledIn post 47, Spangled wrote:y’know, I always thought Ringo was the least interesting of the Beatles
Never heard of WIM before, what does it stand for?In post 35, Galron wrote:Roden, sorry but I'm not reading past games. If you have posts to link to, that's okay. But I'm not reading games unless I generate some WIM.
galron I'm not sure how you came to that read after only 5 posts, can you explain your thinking? you mentioned you were a "town hunter" beforeIn post 118, Galron wrote:Giving Roden a town read.
Let me try analyzing this, I'm still rather skeptical of itIn post 76, Cook wrote:back now.
Cook's Handy, Dandy Plan
- Tracker claims Day One. If nobody claims Tracker we just eliminated three setups (A2, B1, and B3).
Protectives go on the Tracker claim. This will mean that the Tracker is jailkept in A2 and protected in B3.
Tracker reports result D2. If Tracker claims blocked then we know we're in A2 and play the Tracker as an IC. If scum tries to ride the towncred then they're functionally down a player.
If Tracker claims a result we just go Follow The Cop from here since Mafia only gets a rolecop.
- If no Tracker claims then we have a normal D1 with a normal D1 elimination.
- D2, Cop claims with result. Scum killing either the cop or their clear will result in the other one being IC'd the next day, therefore they must shoot elsewhere.
If Masons exist then one Mason claims Cop with a clear on their partner, since either one dying proves the other one.
If Scum tries to do this with partners then we'll end up 1-for-1'ing cop claims and we'll invariably win.
- If you get an FN message, claim it but not who sent it. If you or the FN are run up to E-1 you may claim the message. We will preserve the FN from elimination for one night to let them send another message, if someone reports it the next day the FN is cleared. Jailkeeper, if there's a claimed FN don't prot them for one night, let them get a message – if scum kills them that leaves us rolecop vs jailkeeper, which we can win. This is our worst possible configuration.
- Prots don't claim unless you're at E-1 or you need to counterclaim.
In post 103, Facebones wrote:Sorry for my absence, I was either sleeping or working. On my lunch break now, but before I go back some food for thought: not reading a players post due to apathy seems worse than not reading it due to laziness. Galron, is it just Cook's posts you're apathetic towards? Why?
Eh idk why it's that important but alright. Feels fairly natural to me, though FB has been lurking a bit yesterday and today. Can't read anything with only three postsIn post 136, Spangled wrote:hey Thynhith, now that you’re around, can I have your opinion on Facebones’ entrance?In post 110, Spangled wrote:I have an Opinion on Facebones now but I want to see what Thynhith has to say about him before I detail it.
@Facebones yeah, I get you on the whiteknighting, and what’s more I agree; I don’t think DArby is whiteknighting me, since it seems more targetedatGalron than defendingme
especially since he’s disagreed with me a couple times already in-thread
I always get nervous that I’m getting pocketed/buddied, since I like to do it so much as scum
I agree with you, if my posts feel empty it's because they are. I'm honestly not too sure what to do atm. Nothing's really caught my attention so far, cook's done nothing except suggest her strat, others have only a few posts or are lurking like me. It's really only spangled who's been posting avidly.In post 165, Roden wrote:@Cook:I'm not necessarily anti-you. I don't think your strategy is scummy either, but I'm glad you understand why I don't trust it. I think if you were solely focused on getting the strategy to go through then my vote would be on you, but you're still at least trying to play the game and get discussion going at the same time.
I agree with the Null read on Thyn though, his posts just feel empty. He asks a couple basic questions but doesn't really do anything with the responses anyone gives him, and the post dissecting Cook's strat looks good but is really just a rewording of what Cook already said before. Kinda just makes me think of scum who isn't sure what to say.
VOTE: Thynhith
Don't be buddying me here - even if you're not, it still feels like buddying and it's making me anxious lolIn post 163, Spangled wrote:jeez Facebones you were awake late
or uh up early as the case may be
as to my read on Thynhith, no it didn't develop with that answer
I just hoped maybe they'd seen the stuff I had
I think so far wrt Thynhith I have a slight townlean; how they poked Galron over his sudden Roden read was the same thought I had
I really like to look for mindmeld with other players, 'cause games where I've mindmelded with someone and stuck with them all the way are just the best-feeling mafia games — you're not a poor, lonely VT struggling to make sense of it all; you have someone you trust fully and who trusts you
but that wasn't really mindmeld with Thynith anyway
so a wee townlean, just outta the null basket
Now you're here Galron, still waiting to see why you townread Roden?In post 135, Thynhith wrote:galron I'm not sure how you came to that read after only 5 posts, can you explain your thinking? you mentioned you were a "town hunter" beforeIn post 118, Galron wrote:Giving Roden a town read.
You want to lim Margot because she disagrees with your strat, or because she doesn't like your tone? Any actual reason you think she's scummy?In post 191, Cook wrote:Margot or Thyn.In post 187, DArby wrote: I'm not surprised. How do you want to proceed with the day now?
There's a week left for D1 - why are you trying to raise a wagon, or get people to agree to one, this early? Very odd how you're jumping the gun like this. And you haven't posted why you read them as scum, now or before. Your post feels like scum fishing for support.In post 181, DArby wrote:I'm good with elem'ing either Cook or Spangled. Any objections?
In post 187, DArby wrote:I never said I stopped scumreading Galron, but they're lesser on my radar. 160 doesn't look good from Cook. I want to wait to expand on my reading of you.In post 182, Spangled wrote: so do you no longer scumread Galron? why not?
and what is it about Cook that’s scummy?
what about me?I'm not surprised. How do you want to proceed with the day now?
Before you were looking for elim support, now you only want to "expand on my reading" of Spangled? Same for Cook, the only thing you have to say about her is post 160 "doesn't look good"? Why this change in perspective Darby?In post 181, DArby wrote:I'm good with elem'ing either Cook or Spangled. Any objections?
I believe that Cook believes the strategy is a legitimate one. It's been used by town as well, and I'm not surprised scum!cook would suggest it considering it's low success rates, but potential towncred. Well the strat is NAI, but if Cook were pushing it too hard, then you might have something.In post 202, DArby wrote:I’m more sure on Cook than Spangled.In post 190, Roden wrote:So are these two just the scum team to you? Or are you just certain there's one scum between them?In post 181, DArby wrote:I'm good with elem'ing either Cook or Spangled. Any objections?
I see it the opposite way. Roughly four days have passed with little happening. I don’t think it’s right to say pushing for a wagon is scummy because I’m interacting with the only two real people of suspicion. Spangled is getting townread for a high post count when a vast majority are asking questions and then responding to those questionsIn post 193, Thynhith wrote:There's a week left for D1 - why are you trying to raise a wagon, or get people to agree to one, this early? Very odd how you're jumping the gun like this. And you haven't posted why you read them as scum, now or before. Your post feels like scum fishing for support.In post 181, DArby wrote:I'm good with elem'ing either Cook or Spangled. Any objections?
I'd quote some of your previous posts, but there aren't any relevant. Wanting to lock on an elim this early is not town behavior
VOTE: DArbyaftersomeone answered. I don’t see that as towny. I don’t want blind trust to build. I don’t see how Cook can post a strategy she tried as a scum in a previous game (24) and it not seem more suspicious? I take back my post 160 claim, though. I read it again and I think my read was the only emotional one which tainted the rest of my read of the post.
You said you’d quote more but you can’t. What do you mean specifically?
I stand by 181. I don’t see how getting unsubstantial reads and asking light questions is scum hunting. I think we need to get real reactions with real pressure.Didn’t Roden literally just won newbie 2076 virtually unquestioned as scum singlehandedly? (congrats btw) Galron is still on my radar.In post 195, Galron wrote:Nothing in particular. Just a feeling.In post 183, Spangled wrote:so what is it about his behaviour or tone that suggests he’s playing to his town meta and not his scum meta?In post 179, Galron wrote:A little more familiarty with him.In post 177, Thynhith wrote:Now you're here Galron, still waiting to see why you townread Roden?In post 135, Thynhith wrote:galron I'm not sure how you came to that read after only 5 posts, can you explain your thinking? you mentioned you were a "town hunter" beforeIn post 118, Galron wrote:Giving Roden a town read.
@Roden about your meta tell of Galron, do you feel it has changed at all? How confident are you of it? It sounds like not a great deal of difference between scum!Galron and town!Galron. And he does seem to have fallen "into the background" as you say, though hard to say how much.In post 144, Roden wrote:I never said anything about him being lock town.In post 141, Spangled wrote:Is it that you don’t think he’d do that as scum, and he must be therefore town, or just that it’s something he could do as town?In post 138, Roden wrote:I do think it's funny Galron said he isn't pocketing me and then town read me soon afterward lol. But going off his past games I don't think scum!Galron would do that. And no I'm not trying to get comfy in his pocket here.
(which leaves him open to being scum, of course)
‘cause that’s a small reason to rule him out of being scum; a small reason to essentially locktown him
I've played a few games with him now, and I'm just starting to pick up on his general tone. I think it's easy to scum read him due to his tone, but it softens a bit when he's scum and he falls a bit more into the background. This is just an assumption but it seems like a natural self-preservation thing to me.
So for me I guess it's less that he town read me off of so little and more because his tone so far is a bit of a meta tell. I'm not town locking him but he's definitely a town read for me.
In post 209, Spangled wrote:What did you see, in your reread?In post 196, Galron wrote:A re-read of the game.In post 185, Spangled wrote:weren’t you scumreading me before? what’s changed?In post 175, Galron wrote:I'm townleaning spangles.
Ironic, you did it a second time right after you said that..In post 208, Spangled wrote:mate, I did thatIn post 202, DArby wrote:Spangled is getting townread for a high post count when a vast majority are asking questions and then responding to those questionsaftersomeone answered.once
sorry, that’s just such a silly misrep
Galron wrote:I'm flip flopping on Spangled.
In post 223, Galron wrote:Val89's catchup posts, if that's what they are, underwhelm me. Cook's strategy isn't going to be implemented, and while it's fine to talk about players' reactions to the proposal, focusing on the substance of the strategy is futile, and I believe of little value when it comes to reads. (Maybe other than Cook's, but I haven't seen it yet)
Quite frankly, they're not any more underwhelming than your posts. There's no issue with you being "terse and dispassionate," but nearly all your posts lack substance. You've posted many one-liners that add nothing of value, and your responses to questions seem to be dodging an answer, rather than an answer proper. I'd expect town to be sharing views and analyzing posts, not giving off vague impression reads. All anti-town. Would love to see some reasons for your Spangled read?In post 220, Galron wrote:Terse and dispassionate is actually a good description of me, Spangled. Unless I get a couple of drinks in me
Are you ruling out town vs scum for that one?In post 230, Val89 wrote: That said, the Cook V MargotRosa spat, as much as it was, seems genuine enough for me to say I'm reasonably confident that it wasn't Scum theatre, so that's at least some progress.
..showing he missed something as important as a replacement.
Who is Word? guessing that's not an acronymIn post 306, Galron wrote:Okay I think Word has made a convicing push, where I haven't been as thorough as he.
VOTE: cook
No, no. Cook was never in lolhammer territory, but I miscounted and thought she was at E-1 so I unvoted. I'm revoting because that puts her at E-2, not E-1.In post 314, Galron wrote:Huh?In post 312, Thynhith wrote:Ah crap it looks like I miscounted, with this VOTE: Cook, you're back at E-2.DArby wrote:Cook. You’re now at e-2. If you have any better defense nows the time to use it. We only have 3 days left.
You acknowledge that Cook is at lolhammer territory, then you make surprise that Cook's at E2 after your unvote.
Who's "him"? You couldn't be less verbose if you tried.In post 313, Galron wrote:Apologies. Mixed him up with another player.In post 310, Thynhith wrote:Who is Word? guessing that's not an acronymIn post 306, Galron wrote:Okay I think Word has made a convicing push, where I haven't been as thorough as he.
VOTE: cook
I had this thought soo many times, I'm glad someone else said it as well. Tell us tomorrow how you're thinking, eh?In post 320, DArby wrote:Fuck me sideways and call me Susan I actually want to get off the wagon I've been pushing all d1.
Eh, I'll sleep on it.
Who would be your other preference for elim D1 then?In post 463, MargotRosa wrote:Which is why I think, still, that she's likely Town.
Is Darby above suspicion for you?In post 407, Roden wrote:In post 401, MargotRosa wrote:I need to think this over a bit.
Also Roden, just no. Anyone else. It's not Spangled.This implies that if Cook is town that you think they're wrong about more or less everything though.In post 402, MargotRosa wrote:For right now, I am going to park my vote on my number 2 most likely to be scum
VOTE: DArby
I get why you're so insistent about why Spangled is town but a Darby vote just feels off.
From val:In post 359, MargotRosa wrote:Can someone who has a clearer idea of DArby's meta please tell me if the slightest little tic in my head telling me that his last three/four posts are indeed scum indicative actually is corroborated by his game style?
VOTE: Val would like to know as well. In any case, this makes me townlean Spangled. Val's primary scumreads were Cook and Spangled. If Val is scum, Spangled is unlikely to be as well. If Val was town and pushing scum!spangled then scum would take out Val instead, so perhaps Val you were pushing a town!spangled D1?In post 515, DArby wrote:On one hand we still have both scum but on the other we have both power roles.
VOTE: Val
Why are you still alive?
Perhaps, perhaps. I see your point - scum gains nothing directly from killing Galron, so it's possible they're trying to throw us off. Better to ignore Galron's NK for now. In the meantime I'll read over Galron's isoIn post 522, DArby wrote:That doesn't surprise me.In post 520, Thynhith wrote:@Darby why D3? We should be focusing on it this day. Not sure why you want to delay - your attitude is scummy to me
I want to delay it d3 because we don't have an established pattern of night kills and I feel it's intentional misdirect but I can't prove it. Ireallydon't want to have a d1 2.0 where it's filled with WIFOM.
would appreciate someone explaining what lhf means?In post 335, Galron wrote:This game is super quiet. Thanks, Val, for putting in the effort. Your work on cook seems solid. Somehow it still feels like lhf, but it's a decent case.
VOTE: Cook
In post 489, Galron wrote:I want to see this flip. But it's time for me to leave work.
Funny people mentioning Facebones because there's something about that slot that doesn't sit right and I wanted to get deeper into it.
And also:In post 490, Galron wrote:But there were a couple of townie things from Facebones as well, like when he pushed back at me.
Well you've pointed out to me the NK was probably misdirection, and I agree. All we can get is wifom, so better to ignore it. I also realize my conclusions before about townreading spangled because of the NK may be somewhat flawedIn post 526, DArby wrote:The whiplash tho.In post 524, Thynhith wrote:Perhaps, perhaps. I see your point - scum gains nothing directly from killing Galron, so it's possible they're trying to throw us off. Better to ignore Galron's NK for now. In the meantime I'll read over Galron's isoIn post 522, DArby wrote:That doesn't surprise me.In post 520, Thynhith wrote:@Darby why D3? We should be focusing on it this day. Not sure why you want to delay - your attitude is scummy to me
I want to delay it d3 because we don't have an established pattern of night kills and I feel it's intentional misdirect but I can't prove it. Ireallydon't want to have a d1 2.0 where it's filled with WIFOM.
What happened to you wanting to break this down today?
For whatever reason? Or just your gut feeling? I note that you scumread both Darby and Galron for large amounts of filler. Now Galron's flipped green, still confident about your Darby read?In post 537, MargotRosa wrote:I still don't like Darby.
In post 557, Val89 wrote:Amen. Galrons last words were, refering to me, were "Maybe you'll be protected tonight, if that's where you're going."In post 544, Spangled wrote:Val’s still alive because scum killed Galron for crumbing.
I am inclinded to treat with suspicion anyone who is advancing theories as to why Galron was selected as the NK without acknoledging that, given what was said in twilight, scum would be forced to consider the possibility they wouldn't be able to take a shot a me without going through Galron first. It looks he basically threw himself in the path of the bullet like a secret service agent, and I am asking myself why some slots are speculating on Galrons reads, etc, and are pretending they didn't see that he was crumbing pretty hard.
I must admit the possibility of his last words being a crumb totally went over my head. It does make sense in hindsight, and far better explanation than newbscum or endless wifom.In post 493, Galron wrote: Maybe you'll be protected tonight, if that's where you're going.
I'm not quite sure I understand this. I'd be in favour of limming FB today, and considering Spangled for D3. Behaviour-wise, there is a much stronger argument to be made for scum!FB and with spangled's activeness, it will be easy to pick out any scumplays. You're saying you wouldn't get any information if FB flipped first, but why is that? If he flipped green that would exonerate spangled's "dodgy" read and we'll have rid ourselves of the high chance of scum!FB. If he flipped red we'll get rid of scum, I'm not sure what we have to lose here.In post 558, Val89 wrote: I'm so far in the camp that it isn't enough to justify that read that I consider that response suspicious in itself, but I acknowledge that other people do look for different things, and have different thresholds, when making their reads. As such, I would feel happier if other players could at least give some indication as to where they fall on that scale.
It is important because I think that a scum!Spangled was TMIing Facebones as town there, rather than TRing his buddy, so I wouldn't support a Facebones wagon unless and until I saw a Spangled flip - I don't think I get any information from the other way around. If, one the other hand, I can be convinced that I might be wrong on this issue, and that TR was in the reasonable range of responses to that ISO, then the possibility of a town!Spangled changes that calculus.
I'mIn post 552, DArby wrote: Thynhith is on thin ice.
Hey, at least I'm working my way towards a townreadIn post 554, Roden wrote: This leaves you and Thyn where I have the opposite problem, where I keep wanting to town read you but you'll post something that pings the hell out of me or you'll say something just feels off and misaligned with the rest of town.
EBWOPIn post 558, Val89 wrote: I'm so far in the camp that it isn't enough to justify that read that I consider that response suspicious in itself, but I acknowledge that other people do look for different things, and have different thresholds, when making their reads. As such, I would feel happier if other players could at least give some indication as to where they fall on that scale.
It is important because I think that a scum!Spangled was TMIing Facebones as town there, rather than TRing his buddy, so I wouldn't support a Facebones wagon unless and until I saw a Spangled flip - I don't think I get any information from the other way around. If, one the other hand, I can be convinced that I might be wrong on this issue, and that TR was in the reasonable range of responses to that ISO, then the possibility of a town!Spangled changes that calculus.
Imo Galron would have been a strong candiate for policy elim D2 and would have taken heat for being on the Cook wagon/anti-town behavior D1. All the heat might have been hyperbole, but a good part of it.In post 627, MargotRosa wrote:Thyn, can you explain why you think Galron would be taking all the heat today if they were still alive? Also;In post 516, Thynhith wrote:This.. was not expected. Why would scum take Galron out? If they'd left him alone, he'd be drawing all the heat on D2
I am also putting a pin in this for later, because there is something very odd about going from a scum read of Spangled to a Town read of Spangled based entirely on who was eliminated, especially given that you seem to agree with DArby that the NK was weird and intentionalIn post 518, Thynhith wrote:VOTE: Val would like to know as well. In any case, this makes me townlean Spangled. Val's primary scumreads were Cook and Spangled. If Val is scum, Spangled is unlikely to be as well. If Val was town and pushing scum!spangled then scum would take out Val instead, so perhaps Val you were pushing a town!spangled D1?In post 515, DArby wrote:On one hand we still have both scum but on the other we have both power roles.
VOTE: Val
Why are you still alive?
Why do you think scum didn't NK you?
My issue with Galron was the lack of substance in his townread, not the read itself. Spangled at least tried to justify his own read, which makes it more legitimate in my book.In post 622, Val89 wrote:Understood.
For what it is worth, I think Facebones is looking fairly scummy following his response to questioning today.
In normal circumstances, I would be voting there after that, but I still can't shake the feeling that Spangled was TMIing FB as town D1. Thyn tells me he considers Spangles' read to be legitimate, and it's a playstyle thing, but I found that a little unsatisfying given I noticed he took issue at Galron giving a town read on Roden when Rodens' ISO at the time was more comprehensive than FBs.
We are waiting to hear from Roden; I'll see if Spangle's answers can help me resolve the problem I am having, and I think we need to hear a little more from Thyn as to where he stands on issue of Facebones, because I am still struggling to move past a null read there - I've read through the ISO again tonight and still nothing is jumping out in either direction.
Can you also explain what you meant here, and how your read has shifted after Cook flipped green?In post 469, DArby wrote:My read on Roden will also shift depending on Cook's flip
@Roden towncase Facebones please. Would appreciate a fresh look on things, while Val and Margot are locked in their arguement. Especially consider post 587 and 599. Unless your read has changed, ofc.In post 604, Roden wrote:I'm here. Sorry I've been quiet, work kicked my ass the last couple days, I haven't had much sleep, and I just went on vacation.
Game state feels weird from what I've skimmed, a lot of people seem too scared to seriously push anything. Nothing's happened to affect my reads from the last time I gave them either.
Does anyone have a town case for Darby or Thyn? Because we should be voting there, I don't like the Facebones votes. I can town case him later tonight if no one sees the town posts that have pinged me, from there we can probably just PoE solve.
If there any posts I missed that somebody wanted me to respond to, could you quote it please? I'm drifting off and on into sleep.
Just a coincidence you're scumreading the guys on your wagon, eh?In post 641, Facebones wrote:TOWN: Spangled (still a bit sus of the super early town read of me and going along with Cook's strat, but does seem to be trying to spark conversation (which is NAI, I know, but to me it doesn't feel forced). I do have similar concerns with DArby as he outlined in 213. Also he stands by his thoughts and doesn't seem to be wishy washy and easily swayed even if those thoughts aren't broadly accepted and go against the grain)
Val: (one of the same reason as Spangled (albeit in a more accusatory manner)- he's asking people questions and genuinely seems to be trying to solve this. His interrogation of me comes across as a genuine townie)
NULL: Thynhith, Roden
SCUM: Margot (for putting forth a decent case on Cook and essentially at the point of no return backtracking and started TR-ing her for reasons still unbeknownst to me)
DArby (due to his constant pushing to try and secure the Cook elim, I've still got my beliefs he's trying to line up townies)
This post is where Spangled draws attention to Galron crumbing to draw the NK. I'm assuming you must have read it while casing Spangled. Imo it was a scumplay drawing attention to the reason for their own kill - what did you think of it?In post 545, Spangled wrote:just, sorry, haven’t read the last two pages, just wanted to say that quickly
his crumbs — or one of them, at least — were so obvious that I was pretty sure he wasn’t a PR, just either bad scum setting up a fakeclaim or a VT trying to draw the scum shot
what a play! what a fellow!
that’s the thing I deliberated on talking about before D1 end, btw, but I decided (rightly) it’d be better to wait, just in case hewasin fact a PR, because to out him like that would be a wee bit embarrassing heh
What makes FB null for you? He's so blatantly scum, we have to lim him. Unless you can offer a better alternative, and I don't see how I'm scummier than he is? I'm scumreading him harder than I scumread Cook, he's lurked through D1 and barely seems motivated. His posts have nothing to show from reading our iso and he seems hellbent on not helping us at all. If you could offer a better alternative I'm happy to listen to you. Btw, you're missing spangled from your list.In post 681, MargotRosa wrote:I feel more confident town reading DArby. I feel more confident scum reading Val. Roden is slipping into scum territory quickly. FB is Null. Thyn is still likely scum. I don't remember who the seventh slot is lol
VOTE: Thyn
In post 681, MargotRosa wrote:I feel more confident town reading DArby. I feel more confident scum reading Val. Roden is slipping into scum territory quickly. FB is Null. Thyn is still likely scum. I don't remember who the seventh slot is lol
VOTE: Thyn
@Spangled hows your reread going? Can you give us what you've got? EoD is in about a day and a half, so we really need your thoughts and vote in a timely manner.In post 666, Spangled wrote:I’ll give game-advancing content sometime, I swear. Problem is, I want to do a full reread of the thread and maybe some ISOs besides, both to answer Val’s question on where I’m at wrt DArby and Margot, and to get a handle on the game, and I haven’t had time so far. Soon.
tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow
@Vulture I find it astonishing you could find FB null, and find my treatment of him poor. Which of my recent postings look scummy? This day I did my post to question and FB and did not find his response townie in the slightest. Your analysis seems more like a facade to swiftly mislim anyone to save your partner.In post 705, Vulture wrote:I don't have a null read on FB, he's just 'middle of the pack' for me. Scumlean if you want to split hairs but not as scummy IMO as you or Thyn as of their recent posting. The reasoning for that is that I feel they're setting up for a FB -> Spangled flip which really bothered me at the time, and then trying to nitpick and jab at FB today.
You didn't even say what you disliked about it, but I'll save you the effort. I was simply discussing with Val the merits of limming FB first or Spangled first. Unless you can put some weight and effort behind your reads, I'm ignoring them.In post 561, Thynhith wrote:I'm not quite sure I understand this. I'd be in favour of limming FB today, and considering Spangled for D3. Behaviour-wise, there is a much stronger argument to be made for scum!FB and with spangled's activeness, it will be easy to pick out any scumplays. You're saying you wouldn't get any information if FB flipped first, but why is that? If he flipped green that would exonerate spangled's "dodgy" read and we'll have rid ourselves of the high chance of scum!FB. If he flipped red we'll get rid of scum, I'm not sure what we have to lose here.In post 558, Val89 wrote: I'm so far in the camp that it isn't enough to justify that read that I consider that response suspicious in itself, but I acknowledge that other people do look for different things, and have different thresholds, when making their reads. As such, I would feel happier if other players could at least give some indication as to where they fall on that scale.
It is important because I think that a scum!Spangled was TMIing Facebones as town there, rather than TRing his buddy, so I wouldn't support a Facebones wagon unless and until I saw a Spangled flip - I don't think I get any information from the other way around. If, one the other hand, I can be convinced that I might be wrong on this issue, and that TR was in the reasonable range of responses to that ISO, then the possibility of a town!Spangled changes that calculus.
Oh, really? You stand by ignoring scumtells and lurking and obvious defensiveness, and stand by limming someone with hours left on the clock by pure speculation on their last posts? Well you do you.In post 733, Vulture wrote:Oh, hell.
I didn't announce it because I'm blind as a bat. I still stand by it though.
Calm down with the font there. All you've done is quote a wall of posts that indicate truthfully - before I was unsure of FB, now I am. Perhaps you should have been less careless in your reread. It's quite clear that before, if FB was considered null, his recent posting have only shown him to be extremely scummy. That is why I am so confident now about pushing him. He's the best candidate for elimination, because he has only progressively become more scummy D2.In post 739, Vulture wrote: Do you see the part of that reply you just quoted where I said FB was explicitly a scumlean for me? I've already went over that it's not null, but I find people below him.
Furthermore, I've already laid out what I dislike about you. I went out of my way to quote several posts to explain why I dislike your recent tone; you are either intentionally ignoring these points to slander me, or you're not paying attention. Either way, this is not engaging in a towny way.
I have already stated what I disliked, as listed above, but AGAIN: I find it disconcerting how aggressively you're trying to push through Facebones today, compared to how unsure you were before. You have latched onto Facebones because Facebones is Easy Pickings (tm). You have framed him as an ideal elimeven if he is townin a game where, if he is? Tomorrow becomes ELO because of that. You're showing carelessness.