Prepare to be spammed with popculture gifs!
VOTE: kennyk
In post 29, kennyk wrote:That's not a random vote. It is a revenge from a different game. Maybe I should switch my vote to you. Probability says I have to catch scum if I vote you every game
Btw. this is the real spam popculture:
1) Quite many, around 20. This is my second game on this site.In post 6, hops wrote: - If you're a newbie, how many games of Mafia and mafia-likes have you played prior to this?
- Either newbie or SE, How would you rate your experience level?
- How would you describe your playstyle as as Scum, or how you would anticipate yourself playing as scum if this was your first game?
- For people who has actually played scum before, by eyeballing or actually counting, how often would you say you win as scum? What do you think are the common elements in games where you win as scum?
- What's your timezone and what's your anticipated schedule for checking in on this game?
I hate that cow with a passion. The Miltank is cool though!In post 31, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 54, hops wrote:UNVOTE: N_M
I still get a town vibe from N_M so I'll change my random vote to...
VOTE: kennyk
In post 55, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I'm still not convinced it was random
In post 56, hops wrote:What do you think it was, then?
In post 57, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Not random.
In post 72, Not_Mafia wrote:Why?In post 70, Greeting wrote:I missed this.
Not_Mafia was literally put on E-1 for a while. They're still at E-2. This bandwagon built up way too fast, I don't like this.
In post 73, MegAzumarill wrote:Obviously we want greeting at e-1 instead of NM
Jake The Wolfie wrote:Your gifs are not relevant to the #youths
In post 81, Not_Mafia wrote:When was Janet Jackson last relevant? The Grand Handegg Tournmanet of '04?
In post 91, MegAzumarill wrote:I mean this is pretty obviously bad for town to lim people for nothing.In post 87, kennyk wrote:I can very much agree with you on this. Too bad no one quickhammered though.In post 70, Greeting wrote:I missed this.
Not_Mafia was literally put on E-1 for a while. They're still at E-2. This bandwagon built up way too fast, I don't like this.
The fact they felt they needed to bring it up feels a little LAMIST to me.
Sorry to hear that. Today I had a really busy day at work and tbf if I had paid leave days I would have taken one today. I get 20 paid leave days per year by law, but they get counted every month, so each month at work I get 1.66 day off and I've used up all I have for now. I hope you'll be able to rest this weekend.In post 88, kennyk wrote:Btw. yesterday I had one of those days where you ask yourself why you even bothered to leave your bed. Real life sucks sometimes. I hopefully will be more active in the future.
DaTacoX wrote:Wagon you or wagon Greeting? >.<
I guess I'm in. VOTE: MegAzumarillMegAzumarill wrote:Wagon either <3
Greeting preferred because I'm town.
I guess I'll just leave it at that. This argument is honestly so dumb. Sorry for trying to contibute to town making a choice of voting down someone over more than having fun.In post 95, Not_Mafia wrote:It's a truism and pointing it out accomplishes nothing but groveling for some lame towncredIn post 94, Greeting wrote:In post 91, MegAzumarill wrote:I mean this is pretty obviously bad for town to lim people for nothing.In post 87, kennyk wrote:I can very much agree with you on this. Too bad no one quickhammered though.In post 70, Greeting wrote:I missed this.
Not_Mafia was literally put on E-1 for a while. They're still at E-2. This bandwagon built up way too fast, I don't like this.
The fact they felt they needed to bring it up feels a little LAMIST to me.So it's bad for town to vote out someone for nothing but if someone points that out then it's lame? Now that's some top-tier logic.
It's less about the content and more about the feel of your posts. I cannot get much more from just five posts (there were five at the time of posting of my readslist). They all sound and read similarly to me to Newbie 2078 (it has since ended so now I think we can talk more freely about it), a game in which we both were town.In post 108, kennyk wrote:Why does my playstyle match that of the other game? I didn't post any wild theories (yet). OK, maybe that is because there wasn't much to wave theories around. Although hops tried to step in my footsteps with her Wolfie theory.In post 106, Greeting wrote:Since y'all Einsteins decided to put me at E-1, I might as well share my thoughts before some opportunist decides to seal the deal.
More townlean than scumlean:
hops
This would be the last person for me to vote out at this very moment. They sound like genuine vanilla town newbie. The tone of their posts seems like they actually want to solve this game in town's favour and that's good enough for the time being.
Neutral:
Binatog13
DaTacoX
kennyk
Not_Mafia
These folks have a higher chance of being scum, but don't seem to give me anything to suspect them (yet). DaTaco is the most neutral of them all, Binatog being a close second. I know kennyk from a different game and their playstyle so far matches that of the other game. Not_Mafia is just a shitposter and there's nothing more to it.
More on the err side:
Jake The Wolfie
catboi
MegAzumarill
For semi-experienced players they've contributed surprisingly little to this game. I know it's still Day One, but in the last game I've played the SEs were on a much higher level. My vote is currently on MegAzumarill, but I'm down to vote out either one of those three.
That's what I gathered from what was posted so far.
I don't care if some people find me scummy. If anything, it actually gives me a little bit of security. Crystal clear townies are great danger of being killed off every night as keeping them alive shrinks the pool of suspects for town and gives town a higher chance of hitting a scum.In post 113, MegAzumarill wrote:Greeting, do you think you should be townread right now?
Why or why not?
In post 126, Binatog13 wrote:I think this is a scumlean hunting for PRs, but idk for now. Asking someone to be townread early in the game is suspicious for me.In post 113, MegAzumarill wrote:Greeting, do you think you should be townread right now?
Why or why not?
If you are scum, then there’s virtually no point in me convincing you about anything. Unless you’re just going to think „damn, he’s good” and give up Day One, which I don’t really think has any chance of happening in any game.In post 133, MegAzumarill wrote:Its a weird attitude for you to have.In post 131, Greeting wrote:In post 126, Binatog13 wrote:I think this is a scumlean hunting for PRs, but idk for now. Asking someone to be townread early in the game is suspicious for me.In post 113, MegAzumarill wrote:Greeting, do you think you should be townread right now?
Why or why not?I can agree that asking such a question Day One is... odd to say the least.
Your posts come off like you expect to be townreads at a base. If you want to be townread start acting townie.
If you think I am scum give a case. You aren't following through with anything.
You refer to me as less investigative, but you still haven't answered my question to you.
What do you expect the SE's to be doing in this game that they are/were not?
That’s not true. I have given a reason. I may have not yet made it into a full case, but to say that my vote came out of nowhere is a lie.In post 136, MegAzumarill wrote:Share with the class anyway.In post 134, Greeting wrote:If you are scum, then there’s virtually no point in me convincing you about anything. Unless you’re just going to think „damn, he’s good” and give up Day One, which I don’t really think has any chance of happening in any game.In post 133, MegAzumarill wrote:Its a weird attitude for you to have.In post 131, Greeting wrote:In post 126, Binatog13 wrote:I think this is a scumlean hunting for PRs, but idk for now. Asking someone to be townread early in the game is suspicious for me.In post 113, MegAzumarill wrote:Greeting, do you think you should be townread right now?
Why or why not?I can agree that asking such a question Day One is... odd to say the least.
Your posts come off like you expect to be townreads at a base. If you want to be townread start acting townie.
If you think I am scum give a case. You aren't following through with anything.
You refer to me as less investigative, but you still haven't answered my question to you.
What do you expect the SE's to be doing in this game that they are/were not?
At this point you have given no reason for me to believe your reads are genuine.
At the time of my readslist you were not. Although you did start to somewhat contribute to the game by grilling me, you did not fully justify your suspicions of me either. You just said that my posts were lame. I say this should work both ways.In post 144, MegAzumarill wrote:Your reason doesn't make sense though.
Of all the SEs Id say I am providing the most or second most content.
Unless you think the content I am providing is scummy, in which case you have not given a reason for it.
Oh, that makes sense. I had googled it before but google suggested „lamest” so I thought that was a typo. Still, I had already addressed the core of this argument before, in 97. I think it’s flawed from the onset (and overly reliant on meta) as it suggests that townies should stay silent, because otherwise they’re „too town to be town”. If I feel like I should say something then I’ll say it.In post 146, MegAzumarill wrote:LAMIST - "look at me I'm so town"
Refers to a player pointing out how townie they are, or drawing attention to townie actions they take unprompted.
Generally considered a scumtell. Hence the push from you essentially saying hey I don't like this wagon obviosuly started for no reason.
I have a different view on that. A bandwagon that builds up too easily is suspicious from the onset.In post 151, MegAzumarill wrote:The problem I have with this post is that it accomplishes nothing besides trying to make yourself look good.In post 70, Greeting wrote:I missed this.
Not_Mafia was literally put on E-1 for a while. They're still at E-2. This bandwagon built up way too fast, I don't like this.
You didn't suggest an alternative, try to gather information about the wagoners or wagonee. You just pretty dryly and pointlessly just say something obviously true.
So it’s better to doIn post 153, MegAzumarill wrote:Yes that point is correct pretty objectively
Hence why just saying it with no effort to actually stop it or help out town with it is pointless
That was so... uninformative. Would putting you at E-1 speed up the info?In post 160, Binatog13 wrote:My reads so far:
Town Lean
Hops - I can see the scumhunting on him.
Neutral
Most of the players.
Scum Lean
None so far. Will update info soon.
Yeah, it's great until you have potentially up to four townies dead (if Binatog and the mad cow are town) and the game's at lylo.In post 175, Jake The Wolfie wrote:That just seems like a great plan to outst the foolIn post 173, MegAzumarill wrote:There's a cow in the game do not put bina at E-1
Yes, I'd like some more info on myself and all the scumleans (including MegAzumarill, which you stated in 177 to be neutral).In post 174, DaTacoX wrote:I'm stating it now that I hate to use issues IRL as an excuse so I won't. I'll try to be more proactive.In post 169, catboi wrote:I'm not sure what you hope to accomplish with that? If you have multiple suspects and are voting none, you're exerting pressure on none of them.In post 166, DaTacoX wrote:I have at least half of the game at the same level of scummy for me right now, so I’m holding my vote.
I don't want to revote until I find someone that is clearly scummier for me.
[Town] -------------------
N/A
[Town Lean] -------------
Hops
Greeting
[Neutral] -----------------
Catboi
KennyK
Not_Mafia
[Scum Lean] -------------
Binatog13
Jake the Wolfie
MegAzumarill
[Scum] -------------------
N/A
I'll provide some more info for anyone who asks.
That's fair.In post 185, DaTacoX wrote:I haven't liked any of Meg's posting at the beginning of the game. It all can just be hidden behind the wall of a joke, but I don't really buy that. You two were also clashing over something not very meaningful for a long while. The reason I moved them up was that a lot of their more recent play has actually been helpful.In post 183, Greeting wrote:Yes, I'd like some more info on myself and all the scumleans (including MegAzumarill, which you stated in 177 to be neutral).
Jake is there for a similar reason to Meg's jokes. They voted the same people as Meg, but have only made comments that haven't really gone anywhere.
Binatog is kinda a mystery because they have very few posts and they're mostly vague.
As for your play, you come across as caring and not caring at the same time somehow? I moved you down slightly because I realized you haven't actually been doing a lot of investigating at that I'd just been placing you higher because I had Meg down low.
It’s the latter. This isn’t a trick or putting pressure, I just think that there’s a good chance you’re scum.In post 189, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Are you expecting me to do something, or do you just want me to die?
If it's the former, what?
If it's the latter, why not Not_Mafia?
That’s a question I’ll be thinking about after you flip scum. Otherwise, it just serves as a distraction.In post 195, Jake The Wolfie wrote:If you think I am scum, then who would plausibly be my partner?
Do you have a better candidate to vote out? If the answer is yes then whom and why? If the answer is no, then what would be the most ideal outcome of Day One in your opinion?In post 211, kennyk wrote: It is always right to consider who might be the second scum. But one has to also consider that the two scum players might not have acted obviously connected. If they coordinate very carefully they might leave no visibal connection whatsoever. This is especially true in day one where there is not much evidence in any direction.
As it is highly unlikely to identify both scum players on day one and vote one of them out by majority, I won`t condemn someone who votes someone else out but has no obvious scum partner at hand. And if I read everyones reads correctly, there are not many townreads overall. So there are always many possible scum-partners around.
I might not agree with Greetings read on Jake and the consequences he makes out of them, I agree with him in taking one step at a time.
And as there seems to be a wagon building on Jake with me sitting in the front row, I would like to remove my RVS vote:
UNVOTE: Jake
Then why are you choosing to unvote without picking a different candidate?In post 223, kennyk wrote:No, I don't have any better candidate. The most ideal outcome of day one would of course be a scum elim (most prefered the roleblocker or the rolecop, if the setup has one of them in it). But the chances to get that result are at about 22 % (if I did the math right).In post 216, Greeting wrote:Do you have a better candidate to vote out? If the answer is yes then whom and why? If the answer is no, then what would be the most ideal outcome of Day One in your opinion?In post 211, kennyk wrote: It is always right to consider who might be the second scum. But one has to also consider that the two scum players might not have acted obviously connected. If they coordinate very carefully they might leave no visibal connection whatsoever. This is especially true in day one where there is not much evidence in any direction.
As it is highly unlikely to identify both scum players on day one and vote one of them out by majority, I won`t condemn someone who votes someone else out but has no obvious scum partner at hand. And if I read everyones reads correctly, there are not many townreads overall. So there are always many possible scum-partners around.
I might not agree with Greetings read on Jake and the consequences he makes out of them, I agree with him in taking one step at a time.
And as there seems to be a wagon building on Jake with me sitting in the front row, I would like to remove my RVS vote:
UNVOTE: Jake
I am implying that on Day One it's better to vote someone out rather than no one. A no elim vote towards the end of Day One is kind of washing your hands off any potential decisions.In post 241, MegAzumarill wrote:You are implying they should try to vote out someone they don't eant to???
Quoting you to confirm that I've seen your post and I will summarise my suspicions tomorrow.In post 242, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Greeting, please lay out your case for why you think I am scum for everyone here.
I have a small feeling that you don't have one, but I also want to give you the benefit of the doubt in case you simply haven't had the time to make one yet because you weren't directed to give your case.
What narrative are you trying to push now?In post 246, MegAzumarill wrote:What makes you think kennyk ever supported the jake wagon?In post 245, Greeting wrote:I'm getting more suspicious of kennyk right now. I think that attempting to avoid any responsibility for a miselim is a scummy thing to do.
If Binatog is put at E-1 and the options are either hammer them, noelim or hammer someone who isn't Jake, N_M or kennyk, I will hammer.
Quoting you to confirm that I've seen your post and I will summarise my suspicions tomorrow.In post 242, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Greeting, please lay out your case for why you think I am scum for everyone here.
I have a small feeling that you don't have one, but I also want to give you the benefit of the doubt in case you simply haven't had the time to make one yet because you weren't directed to give your case.
You seem to be saying the jake wagon is a mislim yet you still push them?
They, themselves said, in 211 that since the wagon was slowly picking up, they didn’t want to be in the front row.In post 256, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why do you think that Kenny supported my wagon, Greeting?
That’s intriguing because I feel like I’ve spent 70% of my energy in this game on dealing with your doubts and nothing really came out of it.In post 255, MegAzumarill wrote:Ok but thats the part you seem keen on answering
You are ignoring my questions on YOUR reads.
Overall you haven't really given any reasoning as to why you have the reads the way that you have them, in spite of being asked to give your case multiple times.
Not every question is worth answering. Like promised, I’ll expand on Jake later.In post 260, MegAzumarill wrote:So why to you choose only answer questions about my doubts rather than your reads?In post 259, Greeting wrote:That’s intriguing because I feel like I’ve spent 70% of my energy in this game on dealing with your doubts and nothing really came out of it.In post 255, MegAzumarill wrote:Ok but thats the part you seem keen on answering
You are ignoring my questions on YOUR reads.
Overall you haven't really given any reasoning as to why you have the reads the way that you have them, in spite of being asked to give your case multiple times.
Like I said before, my issue with that is not that they disagreed on voting you out but the fact that they did not pick an alternative.In post 263, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Because, as they said, it was an RVS vote, which gives them total legitimacy to remove their vote.In post 257, Greeting wrote:They, themselves said, in 211 that since the wagon was slowly picking up, they didn’t want to be in the front row.
Them removing their RVS vote also leads to the idea that they in fact did not support my wagon, otherwise they would have.. well, not removed their vote.
Yeah, I'm not sure I'm buying this. Post 275 happened more than 12 hours ago. For 12 hours I was in immediate danger of getting hammered and you were okay with that. If what you're saying is true, that is an extremely risky way of building pressure and I believe that you were at least okay with voting me out.In post 287, Jake The Wolfie wrote: Yes, I didn't explain why I voted you, but that is partially because saying "don't worry, I don't actually want to kill you" makes building pressure harder. That was my mistake.
I think that Greeting can live another day here, but now I need to find a new bandwagon to hops on.
UNVOTE: Greeting
Care to explain, cow?
...what was your goal?In post 330, Jake The Wolfie wrote:My goal has been fulfilled, and I will now replace out of the game in a victory. Ahaha, I have won.
/s
Oh, I thought you meant like you had some role which had this winning condition. Congratulations to you, I guess.In post 332, Jake The Wolfie wrote:To Outlast Not_Mafia.
In all seriousness though, I did find Not_Mafia's actions weird and unnatural, like they wanted to make their death draw some partner lines with me.
Just reminding you that you’re also on it.In post 327, catboi wrote:Very much dislike that hammer
While I know you've been hunting for me since the very beginning of this game, this makes no sense. It's impossible for me to know if Not_Mafia has any kind of power role or not on Day One.In post 343, MegAzumarill wrote:If this flips TPR I say we lim Greeting
What do you think post 316 was for then?In post 336, Jake The Wolfie wrote:It probably would have been better if you announced your intent to hammer first, Greeting.