![Cool :cool:](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
I think we all know of the numbers meta, anyone with numbers in their names are scum!
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
Also keeping an eye on you, Cape...
![Shifty-Eyed :shifty:](./images/smilies/icon_shifty.gif)
:0 how could you? I'm a pure innocent angel
This was a joke and not a legitimate comment about Marci’s alignment, but Idm you looking into it, that’s the point of it anyways, now discussion’s been fuelled a bit moreIn post 16, Cape90 wrote:Usually this behavior is completely NAI and I would argue mostly just comes from town. I dunno what is up with the townread this early either + dunno why you would assume they were pocketing you.In post 13, Meuh wrote:dropping townreads this early, marci>?? must mean you're trying to pocket (either me or azumarill, i'm not even sure who you're calling locktown)![]()
very suspicious behaviour
The bolded part feels odd tbh, why are you suddenly so defensive the second someone makes a negative comment about a read you’re making? Nothing was said about scumreading you, drawing that line yourself reeks of paranoiaIn post 29, marcistar wrote:"speedwagon somebody.."
idk we can either:
-1v1 for no reason
-attack somebody together
ur choice![]()
idk cape90s experience but just in general,In post 24, Greeting wrote:Why do you expect scum to be a bit nervous?
scum are usually worried about their appearances, so i feel like they would be cautious when entering the thread, and a bit nervous abt making the wrong comment. early on people latch onto like anything, so making the wrong comment will be deadly
yah cuz im trying to get the game startedIn post 27, Cape90 wrote:I think you are looking too deep into me.
(like itll prob end up in me being wagoned but idm)
its an early read, it wont hold much weight as more stuff develops
In post 27, Cape90 wrote:This still doesn't feel like a real read to me.In post 23, marcistar wrote:while im aware i usually sus meuh for the weirdest reasons (me and meuh are friends fyi), this post ↓ was 100% serious.
to me it feels weird because i dont remember meuh using "pure innocent angel" much before, as thats typically something i would say.
im not sure if it makes her scum, but it makes her feeloff.its a real read bb if u want u can scumread me for making reads out of like nothing.
The invitation just feels like fake confidence and like I said, they never said they scumread you, so it came out of nowhere. I can easily see scum make that post in an attempt to posture as a confident townie willing to die, yknow? I think you have a fair point with the not a real read stuff, it’s too early to be shutting things down like that, we have barely anything to go off of, any hunch is a valid read at this point of the gameIn post 33, marcistar wrote:to me, "not a real read" is something a scum player would do, so im trying to see if he draws that same conclusion...?In post 32, Meuh wrote:The bolded part feels odd tbh, why are you suddenly so defensive the second someone makes a negative comment about a read you’re making? Nothing was said about scumreading you, drawing that line yourself reeks of paranoiaIn post 29, marcistar wrote:its a real read bb if u want u can scumread me for making reads out of like nothing.
what makes it seem defensive..? it was just a casual comment inviting scumreads on me with open arms
Sure! This is my fifth game onsite, all of which have been in the newbie queue (gonna be graduating from being a newbie after thisIn post 40, ProHawk wrote:Seems like we've escaped the random voting scene so I need to take a few moments to digest the scene which I haven't had enough time to do properly yet.
Man I feel old when new terms come into play that are new to me... when did "locktown" become a thing... haha
Anyhow, I'd love to get a feel for the experience of our newer players if you'd like to intro that a bit for those of you who haven't, that would be great.
I'd rather pressure someone who hasn't said a word yet, infighting amongst the active players would just reward not being present and allow potential scum to hide out in inactivity, so my vote stays where it isIn post 42, marcistar wrote:mmmhmm yeah icIn post 34, Meuh wrote:The invitation just feels like fake confidence and like I said, they never said they scumread you, so it came out of nowhere. I can easily see scum make that post in an attempt to posture as a confident townie willing to die, yknow?
why no vote pressure if u see that as scummy..?![]()
What makes you think 43 is counterintuitive? While it doesn’t further too much regarding those who have spoken, getting people who haven’t to talk is productiveIn post 53, Cape90 wrote:Funny how you all are suggesting MegAzumarill when I was thinking the same thing. Just feels like they have been putting off doing anything useful this game at all and are using 36 as a sort of cover (even if this isn't the case, I still dislike this post).
The other person is Mueh because fundamentally 43 seems counter intuitive in, well, trying to solve the game, at least early on.
Though I sort of like 34 from Mueh as I find it at the very least a good post so they can stay.
VOTE: MegAzumarill
Well that’s the thing, us discussing is how we create things we can then discuss and read each other off of. I don’t think we should start wagons until all have spoken, but there’s no reason not to throw in some smaller scale reads and create the basic playing field we need to obtain to become productive as a townIn post 55, MegAzumarill wrote:It's a personal policy to not start scumhunting till we are certain there are actually scum playing
Nothing that has happened so far has really warranted anything yet though
Agreed on that last line, while I don’t approach the game like you do, your posts do read to me more based on a personal belief about how the game should be played and less a mafia member trying to slow the town downIn post 64, MegAzumarill wrote:I agree it's probably objectively bad for town but as a player I typically do 1 of 2 things.In post 60, Meuh wrote:Well that’s the thing, us discussing is how we create things we can then discuss and read each other off of. I don’t think we should start wagons until all have spoken, but there’s no reason not to throw in some smaller scale reads and create the basic playing field we need to obtain to become productive as a townIn post 55, MegAzumarill wrote:It's a personal policy to not start scumhunting till we are certain there are actually scum playing
Nothing that has happened so far has really warranted anything yet though
1 Form reads slowly but have confidence in them
2 Jump on someone that I think is scummy early and death tunnel them forever (ask Greeting)
More interestingly I would like to know why Greeting/Cape think my behavior is AI.
That's fair, I think sometimes (including this game) I subconsciously approach things more as "find the scum!" than "get a good grasp on each player's alignment!" which can lead to me just generally holding sentiments that kinda lean that way, that's something I've noticed and I'm trying to get better with.In post 71, MegAzumarill wrote:Generally I think that pressuring active players favors town and inactive players should really be pressured if the active players are acting town. Essentially sort the easiest to read players and poe the restIn post 68, StrangeMatter wrote:EBWOP (I hate my grammar sometimes)In post 67, StrangeMatter wrote:I do like the idea of this post being that focus should be brought to an inactive slot, but I prefer pressuring people who are active to get a good grasp on their slot, and get a good read going.In post 43, Meuh wrote:I'd rather pressure someone who hasn't said a word yet, infighting amongst the active players would just reward not being present and allow potential scum to hide out in inactivity, so my vote stays where it isIn post 42, marcistar wrote:mmmhmm yeah icIn post 34, Meuh wrote:The invitation just feels like fake confidence and like I said, they never said they scumread you, so it came out of nowhere. I can easily see scum make that post in an attempt to posture as a confident townie willing to die, yknow?
why no vote pressure if u see that as scummy..?![]()
In post 80, Datisi wrote:please do not colour in your votes like this, because for some reason they break the vote counter.
In post 89, marcistar wrote:In post 51, Greeting wrote:Then again, there is one RVS at MegAzumarill right now. With me and you counted in, he will be put at E-2 immediately. Are you sure about that?mm yeah, putting people at e-2 isnt too bad of a thing i think..? as long as we would make it obv. we could always unvote if it looks like some people are setting up for a quick hammer as well.In post 54, Greeting wrote:I actually misread the vote tally. It’s MegAzumarill who is voting Meuh, not the opposite. Which makes this even safer as even with three votes they will still only be at E-2, not E-1.
i agree with (i forgot who said this, but them), why are u so worried about numbers..? e-1 is where we should be sweating, but if u scumread someone or think somethings helpful, whats bad about putting them to e-2..?
"you all"In post 53, Cape90 wrote:Funny how you all are suggesting MegAzumarill when I was thinking the same thing. Just feels like they have been putting off doing anything useful this game at all and are using 36 as a sort of cover (even if this isn't the case, I still dislike this post).it was just me suggesting it LOL
its true they've been putting off doing anything useful, while i do see the points about this just being their general playstyle.. it also isn't really that helpful? it would be tricky to find out if theyre scum or not if they just keep going "yeah thats my playstyle" its a good place to pressure at least, but i wouldn't condemn them so early for it.
i also didnt like 43, but im not paying too much attention to it cuz its just boils down to i have a different viewpoint than her.In post 53, Cape90 wrote:The other person is Mueh because fundamentally 43 seems counter intuitive in, well, trying to solve the game, at least early on.
Though I sort of like 34 from Mueh as I find it at the very least a good post so they can stay.
can u expand on this more?In post 54, Greeting wrote:I’ve been townreading you, Cape90.
In post 65, Meuh wrote:On that note I’d like to know why Marci threw your name out there in the first place?In post 69, Meuh wrote:(I'm aware Marci voiced why she voted Meg already, but I'd just like elaboration basically)i haven't actually voted them, i just threw their name there and dipped lol
the reason i threw their name out there, was partly because i felt like if we were to pressure them, we would get a good response, and hopefully make it easier for others as they join the game to get a few reads. i also felt as if they might be a bit harder for me to read as the game progresses, but like this is backed up on nothing except pure vibes.
69 is good soup.
hi, hru, got any thoughts?In post 74, StrangeMatter wrote:Oh and I forgot to do this again.
VOTE: marcistar
Time to start with people I absolutely don't think I know.
it depends on experience i think, though its not too damning since theres other reasons why someone could be nervous.In post 78, StrangeMatter wrote:I meant how accurate do you feel the read about nervousness is.In post 76, StrangeMatter wrote:marcistar can you give an estimate of how accurate you think that is? Or, I'd kind of like to see where that idea comes from, so can you provide an example?
the easiest example i could think of rn is an offsite example so sadly u wouldn't see the actual proof. i dont go scouring thru random games, but im sure it happens here too.
In post 93, Prism wrote:Scattered commentary/questions I had:In post 34, Meuh wrote:The [marcistar's] invitation just feels like fake confidence and like I said, they never said they scumread you, so it came out of nowhere. I can easily see scum make that post in an attempt to posture as a confident townie willing to die, yknow?I can see this applying to a generalized userbase, but leveraging your personal knowledge of marcistar-do you think she makes such an attempt as scum?In post 49, marcistar wrote:prob meg, since I wanna solve them and I feel like it might be more benefical to do it earlier on.In post 46, Greeting wrote: Let's say I do. Who is your choice and why?Can you elaborate on why for both of these statements?My response was just a player intro, completely lacking in game commentary and a vote. I just replaced in so of course I would post eventually-it's the game content you should be waiting for.
In post 89, marcistar wrote:In post 65, Meuh wrote:On that note I’d like to know why Marci threw your name out there in the first place?i haven't actually voted them, i just threw their name there and dipped lolIn post 69, Meuh wrote:(I'm aware Marci voiced why she voted Meg already, but I'd just like elaboration basically)
the reason i threw their name out there, was partly because i felt like if we were to pressure them, we would get a good response, and hopefully make it easier for others as they join the game to get a few reads. i also felt as if they might be a bit harder for me to read as the game progresses, but like this is backed up on nothing except pure vibes.
I think you're the player most likely to be mafia, but it's a page 6 read, I'm not confident in it. You could be town and I wouldn't be too shocked.In post 122, Greeting wrote:I can't help but notice that... you're also on that wagon.In post 121, Meuh wrote:Greeting's at E-2, no one else jump on the wagon, E-2 isn't risky but E-1 could be exploited by scum
I assume that you're voting me out because you think I'm scum. But if I'm scum, then how exactly is my partner going to exploit this wagon?
And if you don't want to vote me out then why are you on my wagon, may I ask?
With this post you sound like someone who wants to sound like a genuine newbie, but what you said doesn't really make any sense. Unless you're doing something similar to what I'm doing with MegAzumarill's wagon.
In post 130, Greeting wrote:In post 127, Meuh wrote:I think you're the player most likely to be mafia, but it's a page 6 read, I'm not confident in it. You could be town and I wouldn't be too shocked.In post 122, Greeting wrote:I can't help but notice that... you're also on that wagon.In post 121, Meuh wrote:Greeting's at E-2, no one else jump on the wagon, E-2 isn't risky but E-1 could be exploited by scum
I assume that you're voting me out because you think I'm scum. But if I'm scum, then how exactly is my partner going to exploit this wagon?
And if you don't want to vote me out then why are you on my wagon, may I ask?
With this post you sound like someone who wants to sound like a genuine newbie, but what you said doesn't really make any sense. Unless you're doing something similar to what I'm doing with MegAzumarill's wagon.![]()
Also, there's no benefit to not being careful here! Another thing to consider would be time as a resource, spending more time today talking will benefit us long term, there's no reason to want you hammered this early, even if I knew 100% that you were maf.
I am doing something similar to what you're doing with Meg's wagonbut you'll notice 2 things:
-It's not the focal points of the posts I made before voting for you (which it was for you before voting for Meg, while I casted actual suspicion before voting)
-I'm scared about E-1, not E-2, which I think is something scum could actually take advantage of here. They'd throw in a vote on you, say it was an accidental hammer and move on, it's something mafia could try to do here and I'd rather not deal with something of the sort.
So no, I don't want you to be hammered here, I think it'd be bad.Okay, so if you are testing something, then what is it that you're testing?
You really barely answered any of my questions.
I'm currently mentally preparing to ISO a bunch of people and drop a readslist later tonight instead of just ISOing Greeting, so you should have some more of that juicy juicy content like you got in 69.In post 172, MegAzumarill wrote:Meuh is an interesting case, I don't think they are S/S (scum partners) with greeting. I could see town!meuh and scum!greeting or vice versa. I'd like to hear more from the slot and don't want to lim them today.
This leaves a pool of AzuStuckey, greeting, Prohawk lims for today.
Well, hopefully I'll end up quenching your desire for knowledgeIn post 174, MegAzumarill wrote:It's really not a matter of the content you are posting or the amount, but it leans on paranoia so it's probably best not to discuss.In post 173, Meuh wrote:I'm currently mentally preparing to ISO a bunch of people and drop a readslist later tonight instead of just ISOing Greeting, so you should have some more of that juicy juicy content like you got in 69.In post 172, MegAzumarill wrote:Meuh is an interesting case, I don't think they are S/S (scum partners) with greeting. I could see town!meuh and scum!greeting or vice versa. I'd like to hear more from the slot and don't want to lim them today.
This leaves a pool of AzuStuckey, greeting, Prohawk lims for today.(Might end up procrastinating and not doing it, but I'll try my best to
)
I mean idk if effort is really AI for me, during my one scum game I posted like 53 times in the ~60 hours I was alive, including a readslist (although a much less extensive one)In post 192, marcistar wrote:its cuz ur readslist is so fire people need to see it twice ofcIn post 190, Meuh wrote:Not sure why that posted twice? Site bug I suppose, didn't do it intentionally![]()
i like ur reads, i think ur town, i might be wrong but that looks like too much effort
I genuinely just did a full 180 degrees on you after the ISO, the inconsistency between 188 and the rest of my content is because my mind just changed. After my initial suspicions of you, I hadn't actually reevaluated the posts I didn't like with the justification you dropped.In post 224, Greeting wrote:Meuh
I'm always suspicious of joke play which is exhibited in posts like 12, 13.
But posts like 41 scream genuine newbie on the other hand.
Posts 66 and 69 about me are justified and are a townread in my mind. It's actually the only player who said something somewhat reasonable about me possibly being scum before my accidental PT reveal.
I feel like she's trying to be cute with posts like 81, 90, 98, which is well... cute, but also a bit scummy. Making oneself look cute and vulnerable is a scum strategy I'd personally support and approve if I were scum.
I started seriously questioning her motives in 121 and 127. In retrospect, it seems to me like she was trying to put pressure on me, but I don't see the result exhibited. It's also inconsistent with her later reads (188).
The reads post was good. I think it's a job well done and this landed her a soft townlean for now. (188)
What's a preflip?In post 235, Prism wrote:I also don't do preflips.
May be wrong on this idea but I feel like Strange's in a position a lot of mafia members are: widely null or slightly scumread with not much radical takes, and without much pressure on them. I think this kind of null or slight scumread is what a lot of mafia members like to read each other, I could see many players be doing this regarding Strange.
I'm not asking for a huge list, just a bit more development. Also D1 can absolutely be a productive day and while flips help the game develop, there is nothing stopping us from advancing significantly before thenIn post 325, ProHawk wrote:I don't have the time to go through the thread and make a giant ass reads list, not to mention this is D1 with no flips or alignments to analyze which actually yield productive results.In post 321, Meuh wrote:Hawk seems more focused on throwing suspicion on Prism than on developing significant reads or reads on the broader set of players, which is off-putting
I already mentioned the effort of scum hunting which put you and Marcii as top town reads for me. I'm not sure what else you want?
That’s not the same thing. People looking for patterns within other players’ gameplay is fine, but you’re saying that certain archetypes of players tend to be town or scum based on just seeing some players who don’t like capitalizing or who act as mentors. If you wanna meta read players, just meta read them on their own past games, or at the very least show that what you’re pointing out in these past players was actually scummy. Like for example, you could’ve looked at another one of N_M’s games where he was town and seen whether or not he capitalizes more as town. Meta reads are fine, I just think you’re leaning into archetypes and playstyles a lot when while they can fluctuate to an extent, you haven’t proven your point that they warrant a town or a scumread over it. It just seems like a massive reach.In post 353, Greeting wrote:I... disagree.In post 268, Meuh wrote:Greeting, I think you’re putting a bit too much emphasis on the way some people talk or general archetypes of players as patterns from past games to define your reads. I skimmed through other games I played with Marci and she didn’t use capital letters more there. Mentors can be town, and they can be scum. I don’t think alignment would change whether or not someone plays as a mentor or if someone suddenly likes capitalizing things.
While definitely I am not going toonlylook into past behavior of players this whole game, my belief is that it’s a good starting point.
Also, my past play is being extensively looked into, so why wouldn’t I do that when it comes to other players?
In post 383, MegAzumarill wrote:I'm honored to have my own tier!
You deserve it!In post 384, MegAzumarill wrote:It makes me want to cry tiers of joy.
Holy shit I never realized that. Will never look at that avatar the same wayIn post 386, Greeting wrote:I still haven't gotten over the fact that Azumarill's eyes in Meg's avatar are slightly moving.
Yeah I’ve been accidentally hammered by a townie who didn’t realize it was E-1 before, it’s a real possibilityIn post 402, MegAzumarill wrote:The paranoia is essentially scum will vote and then claim they did not know it was E-1
Which is still plausible
The probably worse case is if town actually does not know it is E-1 and then hammers (Which does happen)
Did Prism do that? I recall her saying she didn't do preflip associations but not actually explaining why, maybe she did in another post that I missed?In post 527, Cabd wrote:yes Cape, I did read your post. I am asking you WHY you got to "it must be TvS", or in other words, why did you rule out T-T?
Meuh, you worry me not because of voting me, but because of the issue with townreading everyone else, by definition even if I'm scum one of your reads is completely wrong? Are you trying to do preflip associative pairings? I believe prism went into why that's a VERY bad idea in a standard game.
If that’s the scum team I’d be ashamed of how poorly I’m reading this gameIn post 543, Cape90 wrote:Imagine if the world was just this simple... Greeting & ProHawk.
Rule 1 of Cape town: I always townread at least 1 mafia.
It sure is a post
My first thought was 2 scum in Prohawk/Meg/Strange so I’m leaning towards them being on the Cabd wagonIn post 672, Greeting wrote:Do you think that both scums were on theIn post 670, Meuh wrote:Welp, that’s unfortunate.
I’ll try to make some new reads and cast a vote this evening
We can still win it!Cabdwagon or did they spread votes? We have two conftownies on theProHawkwagon, andCape90whom I'm still reading town. But then there'smarcistar.
[5]: Meuh, Greeting, ProHawk, MegAzumarill, StrangeMatter [HAMMER]Cabd
ProHawk[4]:Prism, marcistar, Cape90,Cabd
You're both saying it's the other with ProHawk... you should unite and vote ProHawk!In post 692, Greeting wrote:Inb4 the scumteam isMegAzumarillandProHawk. This isn’t newbie play. They weren’t town PR hunting, they just wanted to kill two birds with one stone and simply got lucky while doing it.