Wym? We can vote A50 if we try hard enough.In post 24, Pavowski wrote:A50 how does it feel to be unvotable today? What a treat it must be
VOTE: A50
Wym? We can vote A50 if we try hard enough.In post 24, Pavowski wrote:A50 how does it feel to be unvotable today? What a treat it must be
He said meaningfully.In post 59, Almost50 wrote:You're approaching LAL territory with this statement. I am the top poster of this game as we speak, and I have yet to say one meaningful word.In post 56, Galron wrote:Suss that A50 isn't shitposting as much as he should be.
MmkayIn post 105, Bingle wrote:Not interested in having this discussion at all.In post 102, DArby wrote:Actually, Bingle, why should A50 claim with there being a CPR doc? Shouldn’t the doc only have one person to worry about saving (A50).
Not to mention if it’s so that way we have an idea of who to hold responsible in the event of A50 dying, couldn’t that also be used against us?
A50 will make the decision or he won't, that's all there is to say on the matter. Further discussion of this is only likely to inform the mafia. If it becomes relevant I can explain the why on day 4 or so or in the post game after I'm dead.
All you have to do is trust in the Bingle meta that I believe there is a protown reason for me to advocate that course of action, regardless of my alignment.
Do you read it as TvS?In post 136, Pavowski wrote:Nah, you and GL have moved right on out of RVS with this little kerfuffleIn post 135, Roden wrote:It's RVS, nothing I say right now has any actual meaning beyond seeing reactions
At the very least I don’t think it’s scum theater. It’s too soon to say otherwise.In post 140, GuiltyLion wrote:DArby can I get an answer from you on your own question? happy to wait until Pav responds if you're trying to get his take firstIn post 137, DArby wrote:Do you read it as TvS?In post 136, Pavowski wrote:Nah, you and GL have moved right on out of RVS with this little kerfuffleIn post 135, Roden wrote:It's RVS, nothing I say right now has any actual meaning beyond seeing reactions
Oh. Hm. Obvious but i didn’t think of that.In post 155, GuiltyLion wrote:the thing that's difficult with multi ball is that scum can authentically scumhunt for the other faction, so even if people aren't S-S aligned, they could be S-S unaligned. Not that that's the case here cause I'm town, but it's going to be hard to make definitive T/S reads on D1In post 152, DArby wrote: At the very least I don’t think it’s scum theater. It’s too soon to say otherwise.
I understand the context of it but I don’t think it has anything to do with what I said. I’m open to being corrected, tho.In post 163, Roden wrote:Thanks for completely missing the point of my post!In post 161, DArby wrote:Also I don’t like 146 from Roden.
“People” are not voting the IC. One person (me) is voting the IC. Conflating an issue bigger than it is under pressure is not a good look.
…Yes. Which is why I didn’t bring up the context. I brought up something unrelated I did not like that didn’t direct pertain to what you were saying. Does that make more sense?In post 172, Roden wrote:Maybe that's because what you said had nothing to do with what I said.In post 167, DArby wrote:I understand the context of it but I don’t think it has anything to do with what I said. I’m open to being corrected, tho.In post 163, Roden wrote:Thanks for completely missing the point of my post!In post 161, DArby wrote:Also I don’t like 146 from Roden.
“People” are not voting the IC. One person (me) is voting the IC. Conflating an issue bigger than it is under pressure is not a good look.
I wouldn’t be surprised if T3 mixed GL and LQ.In post 175, mc esther wrote: im pretty sure t3 is talking about guiltylion, seeing as that's who he quoted and that's where his vote is.
It makes both of you come off as petty and being unable to argue on the same page, I think.In post 239, LicketyQuickety wrote:You should read it. It makes Roden look quite bad.In post 237, DArby wrote:I'm not reading this argument and I don't think most people are going to read it either.
Votes have been made, so can we put a pin in this and let other people sort this out?
Fuckin don't my man. I'm still keeping my vote there too.In post 246, LicketyQuickety wrote:Whatever. I will chill then. But I'm probably not unvoting Roden any time soon.
I really need to stop having my town tell be Im too clueless to know what’s going on lol.In post 298, T3 wrote:It doesn't read like a fake dumbtell so I'll townbin DArby for now.
No you detect Galron in his natural habitat
Hopefully.In post 355, Galron wrote:Will an announcement be made?In post 325, DArby wrote:Basically, yeah. This game I want to focus on who I town read the least {target pending}.
Town lean post.In post 436, mc esther wrote:early game, fair question. to some extent, i cant know, and that's what makes online mafia so difficult. it'd be a very weak towntell if it stopped there.In post 433, Auro wrote:Similar question to Esther: do you believe that scum!GL wouldn't have posted pro-town content as he did so far?
posts like this are the ones that have me going "scum dont have to do this and im really not sure they want to". the evidence in-thread is that nobody wants to make these posts! it pings town over scum to me because i think it disproportionately benefits scum to leave those pages as much a black hole as possible. clarifying the general thrust of the argument and giving interpretations seems to be hurt the mafia's, idk, "abstract wincon" (a low-information gamestate) way beyond any towncred it might be worth; it would cost literally nothing to just, refuse to make any attempt.In post 290, GuiltyLion wrote:my one main salient takeaway from the LQ/Roden bit is that both are making dubious claims on one particular front
Roden in 205 asks LQ if LQ thinks Roden "purposefully puts himself in this situation as scum". Again I think Roden is questionably taking credit for something that I feel I'm responsible for (early wagon/pressure on Roden). The logic of "why would I get wagoned as scum" isn't easy to understand from either a town/scum perspective, it's not clear what Roden specifically thinks that he did to get himself wagoned and whether that was intentional. However I have seen both alignments make the "I wouldn't be wagoned if I were scum here" claim, it's not something I feel comfortable reasoning about as AI but I certainly don't townread it, at best it's WIFOMy.
However, Roden has a point in 209 that LQ agreeing that scum!Roden might indeed intentionally "put himself in this situation" is also a bad take. Scum do not love early scrutiny, in almost any circumstance. I don't see LQ's logic in implying that this COULD be a scum plan - again, how and where did Roden even intentionally invite pressure on himself? Whatever Roden's alignment is, I'm sure he'd rather not be voted and rather not have to argue with people voting him.
I can see what LQ is saying in that LQ just kinda went along with an idea (being intentionally wagoned) that Roden put out there, but it's just such bad reasoning on both sides ("if I were scum, I wouldn't be wagoned") ("no, if you were scum, this might be your plan!!") that I'm having a hard time parsing why either player is taking any of the logic seriously.
Why are people sring this slot again?In post 469, GuiltyLion wrote:sure, but it feels like you're trying to drag Pav into a debate about claims that he didn't make or arguments that aren't important. From my impression of his original 440, all Pav was saying was that if he were toIn post 468, Salsabil Faria wrote:If I don’t understand something, I'll ask.knowthat I am town, he would then think that Bingle's shade on me might indicate Bingle scum. However, as soon as you say something like that it can poison the well for NKA (a non-Bingle scum team might shoot me in an attempt to make Bingle look bad), so he wanted to clarify that he doesn't also think me being NK'd wouldfurthermake him suspect Bingle. This is also basically exactly what he then clarified in 457 and 462.
You're trying now to get him to talk about what he thinks scum!Bingle would or wouldn't do, which I don't see as all that meaningful or useful. No one has been killed yet, it doesn't develop nor change my understanding of his original posts, and it isn't something that Pav would have different reasoning about whether he's town or scum. Hence, I don't understand how the line of questioning actually helps you sort Pav, it feels like busywork at best and at worst potentially trying to stir up "issues" with Pav that you can then use to push him.
Oh hi. Sorry, just finished moving. Gimme a sec.In post 472, Almost50 wrote:I'm still waiting on Roden, D'Arby, Galron, Enchant & T3 to submit their lists
Bings, could you please reword this?In post 508, Bingle wrote:I really dislike GLs auro takes, btw. It reads like gl is calling auro scummy for being paranoid, which is p much the exact opposite of what someone being paranoid usually indicates.
Gut read there’s one scum between these two.In post 513, LicketyQuickety wrote:Are you planning on killing your SRs with kindness or something? You're SRing both Roden and Salsa and seem to be very gentle with both of them.In post 510, GuiltyLion wrote:I think Salsas been real scummy and I have no issues with the wagon. I mainly haven't moved my vote because I didn't want to defuse my pressure on Roden, but seems like I scared him away from the game lolIn post 506, LicketyQuickety wrote:GL, what is your read on Salsa atp?
I don't think I've been too forgiving? Who have I mistakenly forgiven in your eyes?
That's why I asked if you ever are aggressive as Town. Which you didn't answer. And why are you not SRing someone who is giving a bogus meta read on you if you're not aggressive as Town?
P-Edit. Okay, so then my question still stands in why you are just acting flowery with your SRs. Does not make sense. Are these just tentative SRs or what?
Like unless LQ is going off of meta (which would change the vibes), wasn’t this along the same vein of your tring me in our last completed game together? @LQIn post 515, LicketyQuickety wrote:These posts right here:In post 514, GuiltyLion wrote:I don't think I've been especially flowery? Like where do you see me doing that, specifically? I went in hard on Roden, he bailed, and Salsa has had enough attention that I haven't needed to push it myself. I'm satisfied with the gamestate currently, I don't need to do anything at the moment other than poke at peripheral slots like AuroIn post 513, LicketyQuickety wrote:P-Edit. Okay, so then my question still stands in why you are just acting flowery with your SRs. Does not make sense. Are these just tentative SRs or what?
In post 133, GuiltyLion wrote:being fair to Roden, I basically challenged him in my last post to go at me, so I'm not surprised to see him bite back. What I'd like to actually hear from him though is why he thinks my behavior is more likely to come from me as scum than me as town, because that's what's missingIn post 130, LicketyQuickety wrote:This is over aggro. Sort of feels fake.In the first, you are giving Roden a pass. In the second, you are basically treating Salsa with kid gloves.In post 469, GuiltyLion wrote:sure, but it feels like you're trying to drag Pav into a debate about claims that he didn't make or arguments that aren't important. From my impression of his original 440, all Pav was saying was that if he were toIn post 468, Salsabil Faria wrote:If I don’t understand something, I'll ask.knowthat I am town, he would then think that Bingle's shade on me might indicate Bingle scum. However, as soon as you say something like that it can poison the well for NKA (a non-Bingle scum team might shoot me in an attempt to make Bingle look bad), so he wanted to clarify that he doesn't also think me being NK'd wouldfurthermake him suspect Bingle. This is also basically exactly what he then clarified in 457 and 462.
You're trying now to get him to talk about what he thinks scum!Bingle would or wouldn't do, which I don't see as all that meaningful or useful. No one has been killed yet, it doesn't develop nor change my understanding of his original posts, and it isn't something that Pav would have different reasoning about whether he's town or scum. Hence, I don't understand how the line of questioning actually helps you sort Pav, it feels like busywork at best and at worst potentially trying to stir up "issues" with Pav that you can then use to push him.
Lmao and he does GL does the exact same thing LQ scum reads him for in the response.In post 516, GuiltyLion wrote:I disagree with your assessment of both those posts, but I appreciate you referencing them. The first one in particular is definitely not a pass, I'm explicitly challenging him to explain why he thinks my play comes from me as scum
Hot take this is town.In post 527, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 469, GuiltyLion wrote:You're trying now to get him to talk about what he thinks scum!Bingle would or wouldn't do, which I don't see as all that meaningful or useful.I asked because I want to know the thought process behind their comment which is creating WIFOM.
My questions are usually based on what I don't understand, others perfectly understand it or not isn’t my concern.
In post 474, LicketyQuickety wrote:This is the perfect example of the kind of weird I expect from Scum!Salsa.In post 455, Salsabil Faria wrote:
For example, Salsa voted someone multiple times without actually voting someone else in the game I played with them where they were Scum. So this sort of counting posts to get to page top is right in line with the same kind of weirdness IMO.Weirdness is NAI for me.
In post 478, Not_Mafia wrote:In post 446, Salsabil Faria wrote:22In post 447, Salsabil Faria wrote:23In post 448, Salsabil Faria wrote:24Let's stop this pleaseOk boss
Also I'm votingRodeniirr@Mod
In post 487, Bingle wrote:Okay.In post 482, Almost50 wrote:So you did see at as signaling. GOOD. Now ACT upon it.
VOTE: SalsaLOL!
In post 489, mc esther wrote:the salsabil post where she acknowledges she's not scum hunting, lmao.I'm struggling in this game tbh.
In post 510, GuiltyLion wrote:I think Salsas been real scummy and I have no issues with the wagon. I mainly haven't moved my vote because I didn't want to defuse my pressure on Roden, but seems like I scared him away from the game lolIn post 506, LicketyQuickety wrote:GL, what is your read on Salsa atp?
I don't think I've been too forgiving? Who have I mistakenly forgiven in your eyes?But the wagon shifts on me, so your one vote won't give that much of pressure on scum!Rodenwagon.
In post 513, LicketyQuickety wrote:Are you planning on killing your SRs with kindness or something? You're SRing both Roden and Salsa and seem to be very gentle with both of them.In post 510, GuiltyLion wrote:I think Salsas been real scummy and I have no issues with the wagon. I mainly haven't moved my vote because I didn't want to defuse my pressure on Roden, but seems like I scared him away from the game lolIn post 506, LicketyQuickety wrote:GL, what is your read on Salsa atp?
I don't think I've been too forgiving? Who have I mistakenly forgiven in your eyes?
That's why I asked if you ever are aggressive as Town. Which you didn't answer. And why are you not SRing someone who is giving a bogus meta read on you if you're not aggressive as Town?
P-Edit. Okay, so then my question still stands in why you are just acting flowery with your SRs. Does not make sense. Are these just tentative SRs or what?Ifis an issue here, you also don't vote me yet but keep expressing multiple times or showing prove that I'm scum here and votingGLis scumreading me but not voting meRodeninstead...
UNVOTE: Roden
VOTE: LQ
My liege, I bestow upon you my top three town reads:In post 393, Almost50 wrote:I feel bored, so I may decide to actually play this game seriously. (Sorry for those this may disappoint)
OK..
First "Dictatorian" Declaration:
I; King of thread and ruler of both Town & Mafia alike; have decided in all my mighty grace torequestorder all of my subjects and minions to each provide a 3-players list of their top TRs (NOT including self).
- You have 24 hours to comply.
- Once submitted you cannot alter your choices.
oh jeez this is quoted weird so I'll respond the best I can and I will come back if I missed something. But the thought is that In the arsonist game we were in that just ended the other day, it felt like you were townreading me with my interactions with Pan/Koba where I had a similar vibe to what I'm getting from GL, who you were scumreading.In post 586, LicketyQuickety wrote:What is this based on? Why do you think there is one Scum between us?In post 538, DArby wrote:Gut read there’s one scum between these two.
I’d be inclined to say it’s LQ.
I have no idea what you are talking about here.In post 539, DArby wrote:In post 515, LicketyQuickety wrote:These posts right here:In post 514, GuiltyLion wrote:I don't think I've been especially flowery? Like where do you see me doing that, specifically? I went in hard on Roden, he bailed, and Salsa has had enough attention that I haven't needed to push it myself. I'm satisfied with the gamestate currently, I don't need to do anything at the moment other than poke at peripheral slots like AuroIn post 513, LicketyQuickety wrote:P-Edit. Okay, so then my question still stands in why you are just acting flowery with your SRs. Does not make sense. Are these just tentative SRs or what?
Honestly, I'm just pushing things and seeing what comes out. My understanding of GL is that he's usually not very aggressive, but what throws a monkey wrench into the mix is that GL says he does get aggressive with his SRs if he's sure about them and GL isn't saying how serious his SRs are on Salsa/Roden.In post 133, GuiltyLion wrote:Like unless LQ is going off of meta (which would change the vibes),
wasn’t this along the same vein of your tring me in our last completed game together? @LQ
Hm. I’ll think on this then.In post 594, LicketyQuickety wrote:Uh, no? Not at all. No idea how you drew that conclusion.In post 593, DArby wrote:it felt like you were townreading me with my interactions with Pan/Koba where I had a similar vibe to what I'm getting from GL, who you were scumreading.
My standard way of reading people is based on play. I don't do a lot of tone reads or RT or anything like that (with an exception here and there). Mostly I try and look at people's reasoning and try and tell if it comes from Town or Scum. I have some experimental read type stuff (like the TvS read from last game [that was wrong]) but I generally just play it straight.
lolIn post 605, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 602, Enchant wrote:What are you trying to achieveMiselimination... duuh!
In post 651, Enchant wrote:Sub-Zero team targeted same target as Doc. That's all.
Let's kill someone.
In post 653, Enchant wrote:Let's think about how funny Salsa died.
Roden of course town who put Salsa on E-1, but i think Datsy hammer is bad explained afterwards.
SO yeah i want murder Datsy for now.
?
I’m a little slow. Could you please reword this?In post 637, Bingle wrote:Spoiler:
Roden salsa TvT makes me feel better about Darby. No reason for scum to lend weight to a new wagon when there’s dueling wagons on not your team.
Was anyone cheerleading the roden salsa fight?
It was the link to the video that put me over the edge. As you, Bings, said I assumed that I didn’t need to quote the context.In post 670, Bingle wrote:Him not quoting Salsa talking about self hammering with several people discussing hammering doesn't make it so Salsa wasn't talking about self hammering with several people discussing hammering.In post 664, Enchant wrote:He quotted different message not ths one.
I think it was pretty obvious what D'Arbolical was referencing when he said "pushing for your own lim gives me an itchy trigger finger".
Oh okay thanks. That made more sense.In post 667, Bingle wrote:moist ceouightanly. (Intended to be most certainly read with a bugs bunny accent)In post 666, DArby wrote:I’m a little slow. Could you please reword this?
There were wagons on Roden and Salsa. We know that neither Roden nor Salsa is your buddy, so scum you doesn't have any skin in the game and either of those going through is fine. Roden and Salsa tried to start a CW together on LQ and you joined that. If LQ is scum, you're probably not scum with him because why would you jump ship to join a wagon on a buddy that may derail the free mislims on Not-A-Buddy. If LQ isn't your buddy, why do you jump ship from a town wagon on Roden to join a wagon Roden is pushing along with the other biggest suspect? I'm not a rocket surgeon, but that doesn't seem like the kind of thing scum thinks they get towncred from and you had no reason not to just stay the course at the time.
Not a "Oh shit this is never scum", but enough of a reason to think you're town that you're not in my murderbasket.
Why T3 over Enchant?In post 689, Bingle wrote:Auro, join me on T3?
A) Yeah, i was taking advantage of my town cred andIn post 698, LicketyQuickety wrote:This also sorta feels like Darby is trying to ride out their Town cred knowing they won't get any Sus from the hammer. Like, when someone claims their about to be mislimmed and your reaction to that is to LOL!hammer them it kinda leave a lot of WIFOM in the air.In post 607, DArby wrote:lolIn post 605, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 602, Enchant wrote:What are you trying to achieveMiselimination... duuh!
VOTE: Salsa
Tbf I kinda pieced that together myself.In post 707, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 638, Pavowski wrote:So either everyone targeted A50 or only Team Fire did, right?and somebody else got doc's and frozen
Seems more likely monkey got tripled upIn post 649, Not_Mafia wrote:In post 647, Bingle wrote:I don't think this can have a drawback for asking publicly given how obvious a question it is, so:
@mod: Are death flavors indicative of who made the kill? If they are, what are the specific flavors for a Fire Kill, an Ice Kill, a Doc Kill, and an all three kill?
NM should be able (have to actually) answer that because this is an open.Yes death flavours are indicative. Ice Mafia isFrozen, Fire Mafia isIncineratedand a CPR Doc kill isShocked. If all three were to target a player, the fire and ice mafia kills would cancel out and the CPR Doc would kill the player. I will add this to the rules section.
Pav - how did you know the Ice Team's flavor was "frozen" specifically? I don't recall seeing that anywhere prior to N_M editing the posts.
HahahahahaIn post 726, Pavowski wrote:Does that strike you as a crazy leap in logic?
If the fire team kill was "incinerated", what would you expect the ice team kill to read as?
Mildly refrigerated?
That's normal for you, though?In post 737, T3 wrote:I'd appreciate it if I Wasn't HammeredIn post 710, Not_Mafia wrote:
esp because i've been gone for the entire day and most of yesterday
Technically not true. I sheeped you mildly til ELo in our last game and we won.In post 767, LicketyQuickety wrote:All you have to know is that Town don't sheep me.In post 766, Pavowski wrote:This is bizarre behavior
In post 842, Roden wrote:In post 839, DArby wrote:In post 707, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 638, Pavowski wrote:So either everyone targeted A50 or only Team Fire did, right?and somebody else got doc's and frozen
Seems more likely monkey got tripled up