Open 843 - Divide & Conquer - Game Over!
Forum rules
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Very tired. Very sure that shooting in Group of 3 is optimal but will do the math tomorrow, sometimes mechanics can be counterintuitive and surprising. Intuitively, note that scum has to shoot an unclear after a wrong elim regardless of what group we pick, and eliminating correctly in group of 3 is rewarded with 1/2 elims, not just 1/2 clears. Worst case scenario also obviously better going down the line in 3.
Will substantively read in morning, not going to YOLO read right now.
Thinking while hiking I decided not to speculate on groups until we actually get a scumflip. Todoroki was a horrible choice to put in if they are town though.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I'm reading again and people calling the groups a million names and trying to assign an arbitrary one is tilting me. Brighter clearly mixes up their own nomenclature at one point and it's a giant headache to sort through.
Use the actual numbers (Eg. Group 3/Group 6, 3hood 6hood), it doesn't add length and is unambiguous.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I already regret joining this game. I already don't like math, but the fallacies/qualitative points being presented are disgustingly horrendous. I'll tackle them next and then hit my qualitative points
tl;dr: Notscience is right Bingle is wrong. Shooting first in Group of 6 yields 40.97% win, Group of 3 approximately 45.2%.Spoiler: Math- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I am going to get there.
This was poor wording choice because it used "qualitative" in two different sense. The first was qualitative points on strategy. The second was qualitative points on play/players.In post 208, Prism wrote:but the fallacies/qualitative points being presented are disgustingly horrendous. I'll tackle them next and then hit my qualitative points- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Honestly, no, let's skip to the end and then I'm going to go for a walk. This is going to be split up by points/slots.
There were several categories of mechanical/qualitative points presented. I could spend eons on Brighter's, but the one that struck me as particularly disconcerting was 36:
The issue with this to me was that Firebringer cited the chance of "messing up" and losing out on perks/elims is cited only as a real issue for the voting in 3, but voting in the 6 was obviously broken townsided autowin. Understanding and pushing probability in one but not the other was very striking to me. I'm going to defer on the interactions with me, the math point I saw coming from a mile away and the fact that it was from Firebringer did not help. That said, I saw it coming.In post 36, Brighter Puppy wrote:I think beta eliminating looks appealing on surface because of higher initial odds, but actually is a LIE once u really think about it and the chances of us messing up and then not even really get to enjoy perks of having say 2 confirmed townies.
LETS GO LONG BOIS AND GIRLS
My major hangups with the slot are 36 and the fact that Firebringer is actually pushing content forward instead of just shitposting. I don't think that's fair of me, because that's more in line with my own preference for play and it's just the mechanical points+fallacies that I hate, but the name of the game is what Firebringer does as scum not whether I approve of a playstyle shift.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
This point isn't the worst but I think you dismiss the value of interactions in 3 pool-lim too much. The scum in the 6 isIn post 186, Todoroki wrote:But, there are other factors. Killing scum day 1 in the big hood wins the game, so scum can never bus into the big hood. But they can bus into the small hood. Meaning, if we are killing in the small hood day 1, the information we gain from associatives is not as good.
Also, if we kill into the small hood, and hit scum day 1, then the scum that is left gets to do two no info kills in a row. So, the literal best case scenario for killing in the small hood is a 1v5 mountainous game where the scum team does not kill anyone until the night before elo. (this is how my last game played out.)
Vs best case scenario of killing in the big hood - which is an auto win. And even if we miss in the big hood, night kills and associatives are stronger.
So, math wise, killing in the small hood is a +4% EV when shot at random, but shooting in the big hood results in better information to solve with, meaning we will not be shooting at random.greatlydisincentivized from bussing, because that is two more elims to dodge, and bussing is not so simple either: There will be a scum nightkill on an unclear N3.
I have seen other towns fall asleep at the wheel after a scumflip Day 1...but none of my games have gone that way, and I suspect this table will be no different even were I completely absent. There are a few configurations where we wind up with paint drying in 3 way but not many.
I also do not think I gave nothing in my first two posts, and I am surprised that Lukewarm in particular has not speculated on where he was put.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
You don't want difficult to vote people in the group of 3In post 188, innocentvillager wrote:
?In post 177, Prism wrote:Todoroki was a horrible choice to put in if they are town though.unlessyou're intentionally sandbagging it. Looking at the pairings, I thought all 3 are difficult to vote out as town, and perhaps that was intentional as opposed to some obvious juxtaposition, but likely they were thinking something else entirely.
Todoroki in particular has two different players that are generally easy to read, though there has been talk of notscience having "graduated". Not many people saw Guardians where Lukewarm improved rapidly. I was surprised to see Firebringer call notscience often misread, which I suspect he believes even in a scumworld, which speaks to the subjectivity of experience.
The only time I seriously considered eliminating in the group of 6 during my hike was wondering whether the group of 3 would be effectively self-resolving with time.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Focusing on the three, my current vote is esther. IV I feel I now have some idea how to read and think posts like 170 are very difficult for him to fake. 9:12 he really struggled to give reads like this off the cuff without making them overly convoluted, and the ones that did come were with a high degree of intentionality and thought. Wouldn't shock me if he's scum but yeah.
Todoroki is null for now. I am confident I still have, for the moment, Todoroki's number, and it is more of a matter of time for when I catch them than a question of if. There was one game I struggled to see notscience as town but even spectating I have always found it trivial. No one would be happier than me to be proven wrong.
Esther I think had a few issues. This sequence I felt the same as Kuriyama and thought the process transparently fake:
This is tough to pin down exactly why it pinged me, but an easy logical criticism is that "don't see why scum would post it" and "wouldn't [explicitly] expect to be townread for it" is a big gulf. Fundamentally, "i just don't really see why scum would post it." is just a really low that I think is in the same dismissive family as Cabd's response to me in Holiday Dance.In post 63, mc esther wrote:
i dont think anyone's gonna townread firebringer for theoryposting, and i dont think firebringer expects to be townread for it.Kuriyama wrote:
to try to get townread?In post 52, mc esther wrote:my gut caught this too, but i think it's lying to me. i just dont really see why scum would post it.I'm going to combine a strategy critique here with a criticism of the slot. If we lim in the small pool we NEVER hit 5 way ELO is the key counterpoint, and the clear is not nearly enough to justify going out of your way to seek the scenario (20->25% EV in 5 way, probably more w/ kingmaker mech, countered by better odds+getting a clear in 7p instead)
And I absolutely think she should know better.
VOTE: mc esther- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
This isn't relevant to my vote on you-though I do believe you put yourself in the 3 over the 6-but I want to note that this isn't the best assumption that scum did not research you given they had the full 48 hours.In post 96, mc esther wrote:i probably ended up in that group on those grounds ("nobody knows me" is pretty similar to "hard to read" imo).
While I am unusually neurotic with these things, I would be shocked if neither head of Todoroki researched it as scum, and it is completely possible that they skimmed your games for a strength gauge without any idea of your main.
How they decided the pairings also depends heavily on who the scum are to start.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I tried my best to make the recent set of posts as level, genuine, and critical without being mean-spirited or vicious. While I hope I succeeded, I apologize if that is not the case. Impact matters more than intent, but I hope knowing that I genuinely tried for that set to keep it level will allow for some benefit of the doubt.
I think it was fine to question the legitimacy, which is why I pointed you to meta if you were concerned about it.In post 226, Brighter Puppy wrote:What. I'm not allowed to read into it? I mean... ok.
Back to lurking then.
- Norwee
"Freaking out over nothing" though did indeed tilt me off the ends of the earth and when you said that you weren't questioning the legitimacy, yeah I almost blew a fuse. There's a disconnect here over "trying to understand" vs. "questioning the intent" which I viewed as equivalent, though the latter is arguably more aggressive.
I felt strongly thatwhyI hated the qualitative points around the mechanical discussion was to just finish up my posts on them, which is why I said I'd circle back.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
EBWOPIn post 234, Prism wrote:I felt strongly that [the best way to explain]whyI hated the qualitative points around the mechanical discussion was to just finish up my posts on them, which is why I said I'd circle back.
I don't think I need the walk anymore but I do have to start packing for a flight in a few hours. I'll be around.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Can you remind me what my take is on this and why it is bad?In post 252, mc esther wrote:I very much stand by the whole "i dont get why puppy feigns mechanical enthusiasm as scum" thing (and, i think prism's take on this is kinda bad and weird, do you really think that holds up on a reread?)
Very short post, long drive atm and am just stopped for gas- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
My concern is essentially that you were trying to give a read and interact substantively, but I didn't feel like there was any depth to it at all.
My interaction with Cabd was different because it was a direct call-out rather than a tag-along to someone else's point, but the comparison was never really the point.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I realized something horrible while out running.
It's not just that I'm waiting for notscience to post so I can sort him, or that the game would be better with full participation
Ineednotscience. I need him to show up, to say something I disagree with, to condescend to him in my corrections, to treat him like an errant teenager even though he is the same age.
Without all of it I am empty, aimless, a hollow shell devoid of purpose.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
the whole point of that was not to get in the way of the current interactions lmao but the ~mystery~ too strong
tl;dr: I'm intentionally trying to give you space (I had you narrowed to 2 people pregame) and avoid undercutting/questioning your approaches this game. If you ever want to dialogue on a slot, though, or want direct feedback let me know.
All of that will obviously go out the window if I ever think you're acting in bad faith but we'll cross that bridge if we ever get there and I hope we do not.
and don't ask me now because I'm going to BED- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
I will not be here today. I just got my first acceptance into law school.
I do not have words to express. I am overwhelmed. I have worked towards this every day for over two years, with nothing else in mind. So much of why I have kept playing, and why I play so intensely, was tied to this.
Thanks to everyone that has put up with me the last two years.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
Again I do not find the first paragraph persuasive at all given Guardians. You played your heart out and did well but still fell to more experienced players, and it is not just Pooky you are afraid of.
VOTE: Todoroki
I really do not like what Esther has given either, I don't know if she is just annoyed because I've never pushed her before or what, but I feel confident that 391 is a borderline scumclaim.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
...And both you and notscience have been scumread early. It is also hard forbothof you to dodge. This is handwaiving the others and expressing confidence in both of your scumgames that I frankly do not think you have, and this isjust taking your word for iton Day 1 autoloss and not assuming you planned for 3 or for both.
It is not lost on me that half of the Group of 6 I struggle to read, even if I doubt it was done for that purpose.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
(I think both of those are overly specific and trying to resist me generalizing. This would be valid if you're town, but I don't buy that you are worried in exactly these specific scenarios and pretty confident otherwise, it is more likely that the specific scenarios are especially concerning and the rest only mild to medium concerning.
And you thinking 4 of the 6 are universally worse suited is ????? if legitimate)- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
"I haven't been eliminated Day 1" to mean you wouldn't be worried about it.
"When not actively panicking" is a qualifier to the above, but again has the feel of "I'm strong when I'm not under pressure" where you obviously wouldn't feel pressure or anxiety upon flipping scum, because no elim Day 1 etc.- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
- Prism
-
Prism Jack of All Trades
- Prism
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: August 18, 2015
That is still a ridiculous amount of conditionals and I am skeptical of several, again in particular 2 and 4.
I think you understand why I am skeptical. It is not much of a puzzle and I have been very direct.
Do you think me being wrong is scum indicative or motivated? If not, go find scum in the 3 or 6. - Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism
- Prism