Mini 2260: Achromatic Calamity || Game Over
Forum rules
Don't know if this has been answered yet, but in rvs, who looks at the VC? If there is one?. Really if you come in late you may get a feel for what the VC should look like, but no more than that This seems more coincidental than intentional.In post 44, anahit wrote:best post is like, uh, this i guess:In post 41, anahit wrote:want to play a round of best post/worst post with me?cause is towards someone who had just posted and feels like, not thought about,
worst post is probably this one:because pressure for pressure's sake is actively bad for town here and was immediate second vote on radical rat which would have had to be intentional and is otherwise just empty hello post
okay your turn
Present. I refused to touch a PC, phone or anything over most of the weekend. Well a phone a little bit I think. I was a bachelor all last week, and that makes me a little antsy and throws me out of my usual goings on.
What should I be focusing on in the game so far? I've read a few pages, and I want to stab the Hatters for some reason, maybe because they didn't invite anahit for tea, which would've made for a more pleasant conversation. I'm getting the impression that the Hatters are using colorful language to be intentionally misunderstood. But maybe I'm just not following what they're getting at.
In post 62, Greeting wrote:No, but it'd be nice to see a familiar face.In post 61, anahit wrote:hm
would the gamestate somehow be different to you if galron had made 1-2 rvs posts like most everyone else?
<3In post 63, anahit wrote:ah, i too enjoy galron's presence +)In post 62, Greeting wrote:No, but it'd be nice to see a familiar face.
I null read this post.In post 77, Isis wrote:One of my favorite outfits is my longsleeve white with horizontal black striped shirt, black tights, my spongey cottony white shin length skirt, all with black flats with little black bows on them and the white Tori Burch purse my cousin got me for Christmas.
This is an alignment indicative post and I expect Morning Tweet to reset my prod timer to 36 hours from now.
Double null read it actually.
I was just thinking that this game so far feels like what could be an episode of Alice in WonderlandIn post 84, anahit wrote:all posts are either made by mafia or not...In post 76, Isis wrote:I strongly disagree with this post!
but yeah sometimes i get lost in rabbitholes that's certainly true
I don't dig this vote. Interested to see where it goes.In post 89, mc esther wrote:okay!In post 86, anahit wrote:posting is good for town though
UNVOTE:
VOTE: greeting
I have a feeling that this is not game related, but it piqued my curiosity, and if it is oog I want to ask about it post-game.In post 91, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:I am glad to see more systems being more open about their being on this forum
I didn't pick up that greeting's vote sequentially was immediately after the other one (mc esther's??), so taking that into account I get your premise but I still disagree with the criticism when I think about the way that I approach a game's entrance. Unless I'm really late like I was here. I generally pick out a name from the plist and just vote there without registering any prior votes or posts even. It just seems to be reading into something that if I find pretty innocuous. But there are those who seem to get reads out of the first couple of pages from people's entrances and rvs banter, so maybe it's just a playstyle thing.In post 173, anahit wrote:? the first vote on radical rat was the post immediately preceding greeting's - it felt like an intentional like 'wagons are good!' sort of rvs postIn post 151, Galron wrote:Don't know if this has been answered yet, but in rvs, who looks at the VC? If there is one?. Really if you come in late you may get a feel for what the VC should look like, but no more than that This seems more coincidental than intentional.
but! very importantly, wagons for wagons sake are not actually good for town here (and towns should be making it so they do not have to be wagoned to be readable and so forth and towns should be finding other ways to sort players)
but all of that isn't so so important more that greeting was kinda like, default rvs posting in a way that would match other games but not this one but not in a way that scum would necessarily notice before posting because scum less likely to realize this than town
But you're also talking about sorting people outside of wagons, which is like, to me, sorting people outside of meta. It just seems to be the site's culture. No matter how much I try to disregard how someone's played before as whatever alignment, I have a difficult time doing it. Meta creep is inevitable. I'd say they're both valid sorting methods, if inferior.
But also the ding on greeting for posting HELLO aside from the vote doesn't jibe well with me as I look at it. If he had just posted the hello and not voted radical rat, it seems he wouldn't have blended in as well if that was what he was going for. It would've been better to vote someone else. Again, from my experience, I've gotten questioned for not voting anyone in rvs as either alignment, when all I'm doing is acknowledging game start.
That was a lot longer than I anticipated.
This seems a little odd given there weren't all that many posts between the time you voted and I asked the question, and I don't think greeting even saw it.In post 161, Galron wrote:And I'm spelling EdensFlame wrong, sorry
But you voted Eden for saying something though.In post 163, SirCakez wrote:I don't that that's what Eden was saying though?In post 121, anahit wrote:it is like, unless i was focused on a partner of edensflame's (so somewhere in {ahri, mad hatters tea party, greeting(?)}) then i think edensflame more or less telling me to try not to get distracted/focus on relevant things/not waste time is probably +townIn post 111, SirCakez wrote:VOTE: Edens flameIn post 90, EdensFlame wrote:I agree more posting is good for town, although one big part of it is not wasting time talking about parts that are less relevant.
I'm not entirely sure Mad Hatter's talk so far is genuine, but I'm not discounting the possibility.
Don't find it likely scum would draw that attention to themselves early, but it's possible.
Conclusion: I think I should keep an eye on the Hatter
This post is basically a bunch of words that means nothing
right outside of the partner being focused on that seems kinda unlikely to come from mafia to me? does that make sense
But did mcesther give greeting townie points?In post 174, anahit wrote:i mean, this is mostly because greeting's been absent since and others didn't really engage with it, which seems like kinda a strange thing for you to interpret as +town for greeting rather than +mafia,In post 162, mc esther wrote:sorry to disappoint, but as im sure youve since noticed -- nowhere!In post 157, Galron wrote:I don't dig this vote. Interested to see where it goes.
I meant that you voted Eden for saying nothing.In post 274, Galron wrote:But you voted Eden for saying something though.In post 163, SirCakez wrote:I don't that that's what Eden was saying though?In post 121, anahit wrote:it is like, unless i was focused on a partner of edensflame's (so somewhere in {ahri, mad hatters tea party, greeting(?)}) then i think edensflame more or less telling me to try not to get distracted/focus on relevant things/not waste time is probably +townIn post 111, SirCakez wrote:VOTE: Edens flameIn post 90, EdensFlame wrote:I agree more posting is good for town, although one big part of it is not wasting time talking about parts that are less relevant.
I'm not entirely sure Mad Hatter's talk so far is genuine, but I'm not discounting the possibility.
Don't find it likely scum would draw that attention to themselves early, but it's possible.
Conclusion: I think I should keep an eye on the Hatter
This post is basically a bunch of words that means nothing
right outside of the partner being focused on that seems kinda unlikely to come from mafia to me? does that make sense
Now that I've read more, you said that they were just posting a bunch of words that equated to nothing, but then you tell anahit that Eden's Flame was actually saying something.In post 276, Galron wrote:I meant that you voted Eden for saying nothing.In post 274, Galron wrote:But you voted Eden for saying something though.In post 163, SirCakez wrote:I don't that that's what Eden was saying though?In post 121, anahit wrote:it is like, unless i was focused on a partner of edensflame's (so somewhere in {ahri, mad hatters tea party, greeting(?)}) then i think edensflame more or less telling me to try not to get distracted/focus on relevant things/not waste time is probably +townIn post 111, SirCakez wrote:VOTE: Edens flameIn post 90, EdensFlame wrote:I agree more posting is good for town, although one big part of it is not wasting time talking about parts that are less relevant.
I'm not entirely sure Mad Hatter's talk so far is genuine, but I'm not discounting the possibility.
Don't find it likely scum would draw that attention to themselves early, but it's possible.
Conclusion: I think I should keep an eye on the Hatter
This post is basically a bunch of words that means nothing
right outside of the partner being focused on that seems kinda unlikely to come from mafia to me? does that make sense
To be clear, you're read on greeting is coming from his rvs vote. Is that correct?In post 226, anahit wrote:this makes senseIn post 220, mc esther wrote:i just didnt think my vote was doing anything there. i couldve parked it for the next few days to make doubly sure, but that didnt seem worth lol. like. do you want to vote greeting with me?In post 174, anahit wrote:i mean, this is mostly because greeting's been absent since and others didn't really engage with it, which seems like kinda a strange thing for you to interpret as +town for greeting rather than +mafia,
i guess mostly i was trying to say that greeting still seems one of most likely mafias to me, and that i didn’t want slot to be cleared for today simply because you moved your vote elsewhere, as what happened before you did so was not +town for greeting to me, but i also get trying to do something with your vote et cetera
Something about this answer feels off. Isis was giving you two options, but there are more, like you owe it to yourself so you understand the development of the game for example. It seems you took the easy way out.In post 232, Radical Rat wrote:Because I owe it to the game. If I'm scum I'm scum, and if I'm not I'm not, regardless of whether I get around to reading.In post 223, Isis wrote:In what sense do you hold yourself accountable for catch-up? Is it like, I'll catch up because I owe it to the game, or I'll catch up and if I don't I'm scum?
I'm like mostly sure it's the former but I need to prodge because I have ectrolysis tomorrow and might be exhausted and I promise NOT to catchul until I replay Kirby's adventure until I reach the nostalgic black and white level that serves as a callback to the game boy game
Take out the middle part and yes. Unless you're talking about a choose your own adventure book, but that would be more +town I guess.In post 247, anahit wrote:well,In post 236, Greeting wrote:I don't see a possible way for me to know what's going to unfold, town or scum, too.
you see, the mafia know the towns and the mafias, and potentially more about the setup and so forth,
and as opposed to my open chapters, they know the possible endings,
like turn to page 72 if you eliminate edensflame!
but turn to page 196 if you eliminate vanderscamp!
but the mafias know what those pages say beforehand,
I want to understand what you're getting at here. I recalled something because of content, not because of the player, and I thought that content was scummy. And I think you're saying I need to know who made that content (vote) and the rest of the body of their work in order to make that judgment. Am I close?In post 256, Isis wrote:This seems really inductive when the exact identities aren't memorable so I think it's pretty scummy.
What's this?In post 252, Vanderscamp wrote:the constructed nature of the RP
Agree with thisIn post 280, anahit wrote:probably also noteworthy that radical rat didn't actually yet do the thingIn post 279, Galron wrote:Something about this answer feels off. Isis was giving you two options, but there are more, like you owe it to yourself so you understand the development of the game for example. It seems you took the easy way out.In post 232, Radical Rat wrote:Because I owe it to the game. If I'm scum I'm scum, and if I'm not I'm not, regardless of whether I get around to reading.In post 223, Isis wrote:In what sense do you hold yourself accountable for catch-up? Is it like, I'll catch up because I owe it to the game, or I'll catch up and if I don't I'm scum?
I'm like mostly sure it's the former but I need to prodge because I have ectrolysis tomorrow and might be exhausted and I promise NOT to catchul until I replay Kirby's adventure until I reach the nostalgic black and white level that serves as a callback to the game boy game
I usually drop meme-plays when I try after the first day or two because of this.In post 293, anahit wrote:pretty sure vanderscamp means how it is difficult to determine if mad hatters posts feel scummy in the way they are constructed because coming from scum or because of their posting style, the alliteration and so forth, which also takes like, similar things to put togetherIn post 291, Galron wrote:What's this?In post 252, Vanderscamp wrote:the constructed nature of the RP
That's exactly what I'm saying. It's not coincidental imoIn post 303, anahit wrote:i mean, i know i'm probably not supposed to say,In post 302, anahit wrote:hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmIn post 301, Galron wrote:With this plist there really isn't a lot of activity, like everyone's blood sugar is down or there's a carnival on the other side of town.
do you not think there might be another reason for this?
but
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
The answer confuses me.In post 357, Isis wrote:Yeah, close enough. It matters less whether the body of work disrupts the assessment as scum because being a visible content mill is more importantIn post 283, Galron wrote:I want to understand what you're getting at here. I recalled something because of content, not because of the player, and I thought that content was scummy. And I think you're saying I need to know who made that content (vote) and the rest of the body of their work in order to make that judgment. Am I close?In post 256, Isis wrote:This seems really inductive when the exact identities aren't memorable so I think it's pretty scummy.
I just have a handful of nulls at this point. anahit seems to be a consensus town read, and I'm leaning that way but I'm not wholly convinced. Cakez is content-worthy scum lean, and Toogs' slot is almost anti-content null scum. I think I do see what Cakez was thinking about edensFlame now maybe. I don't understand the read on me by Isis. Pooky isn't very lovable this game. I feel like I've been defending Greeting, but I don't know that I have; I just have played a bunch of games with him recently and haven't noticed much difference, even with anahit's point about putting the cart before the horse, which was interesting. There is some other stuff that I've been thinking that I can't recall right now, and I feel pressured to make a vote.
pedit: VOTE: toogalooVOTE:
I don't want to hammer. I don't know where we're at even though I've read this four times. None of this is making a whole lot of sense to me.
pedit: VOTE: toogalooVOTE:
I don't want to hammer. I don't know where we're at even though I've read this four times. None of this is making a whole lot of sense to me.
They each have one read. Dwlee says they can read Cakez, but Cakez has been producing content and Dwlee hasn't mentioned it. Cakez says he can read toogeloo so doesn't want toogeloo until toogs produces more. Toogeloo likes Cakez for town but really hasn't said much more than what is evident, that this is an underplayed game and he has to vote Greeting as a counter to him. Radical Rat's biggest sin perhaps was promising some work then repping out, which may or may not be AI.In post 441, mc esther wrote:theyre not that comparable? like, dwlee would be an "i want to get rid of the lurker" elimination. radical rat (idk about toogeloo) is a scumread.In post 436, Galron wrote:What separates toogeloo from dwlee?
There's not a whole lot there.
Super jealous. Why did I ever quit?In post 444, Dwlee99 wrote:I can be kindaIn post 437, Galron wrote:dwlee, are you around?
Been very busy today. Went sledding
You were wanting more content from Cakez and I was wondering if you have gotten anything yet?
What about his other content?In post 448, Dwlee99 wrote:Cakez response to me is kinda NAI and I'm not sure if Cakez is low-key buddying me or actually thinks I'll be more readable laterIn post 446, Galron wrote:Super jealous. Why did I ever quit?In post 444, Dwlee99 wrote:I can be kindaIn post 437, Galron wrote:dwlee, are you around?
Been very busy today. Went sledding
You were wanting more content from Cakez and I was wondering if you have gotten anything yet?
This makes me uneasyIn post 456, mc esther wrote:that said, my main point here is that i suspect toogeloo's maf, but obviously i dont actually know that for sure, and presumably you dont either. i dont want to eliminate toog's buddy today, i want to eliminate toog and look for their buddy if im proven right.
Is mc esther's progression on Toogs indicative of someone with conviction?In post 462, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:It could make you uneasy.
Contrarywise it should make you feel assured.
I do apologise, the Tweedle Twins came for Tea and told their tantalising tales to Hare and myself.
*sips tea*
A little cold... anyway.
I am curious as to what makes you ill at ease about the post from our Circular Artisan. The point made is quite simple. Strike at the soul of scum you know, not at the scum you don't.
You aim at your target, not at the one next to them who could well be just an innocent bystander.
As for my opinions, the Monochromatic Bear is an impure wagon. The Fire Fox would do well to elaborate and expand upon her votes upon both The Monochrome Queen and Bear - until so she is one the Bandersnatch will be watching, along with the The Timekeeper and The Curious. The Jailed Songbird is still the best elimination for today, in my opinion.
Crickets.In post 467, anahit wrote:what does anyone assume about dwlee/pooky/vanderscamp w/ regards to current wagons
It would be easy to say that one must be a maf, right? But the logic to get there doesn't necessarily hold too well. Their silence is quite loud, though.
Why the need to broadcast it?In post 493, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:The inverse is true. Esther is someone who is open about their lack of confidence in this and that people are claiming the confidence to be strong are to be interrogated when Time allows such.In post 491, Galron wrote:Is mc esther's progression on Toogs indicative of someone with conviction?In post 462, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:It could make you uneasy.
Contrarywise it should make you feel assured.
I do apologise, the Tweedle Twins came for Tea and told their tantalising tales to Hare and myself.
*sips tea*
A little cold... anyway.
I am curious as to what makes you ill at ease about the post from our Circular Artisan. The point made is quite simple. Strike at the soul of scum you know, not at the scum you don't.
You aim at your target, not at the one next to them who could well be just an innocent bystander.
As for my opinions, the Monochromatic Bear is an impure wagon. The Fire Fox would do well to elaborate and expand upon her votes upon both The Monochrome Queen and Bear - until so she is one the Bandersnatch will be watching, along with the The Timekeeper and The Curious. The Jailed Songbird is still the best elimination for today, in my opinion.
In post 456, mc esther wrote:but obviously i dont actually know that for sure
As I read that exchange again, I can maybe see that but it feels off to me.In post 497, mc esther wrote:because i was directly answering a question from someone who was actually (or seemed to be) assuming toogeloo's flip in advance?In post 496, Galron wrote:Why the need to broadcast it?
In post 456, mc esther wrote:but obviously i dont actually know that for sure
I agree w/ your point about the Toog wagon, but Radical Rat did him no favors.In post 498, SirCakez wrote:this just feels like such a weak sauce voteIn post 400, Greeting wrote:I am not sure if my vote is still valid afterRadical Rat's replacement so in case it isn't then VOTE: Toogeloo.
Unfortunately, I won't be able to read the thread thoroughly as I wanted to. I still do wish to play though. If, somehow, I make it to Day 2, I will contribute more. If not then oh well, farewell. Haven't been gotten my head around this game anyway.
I mean I'm confbiased here I know but c'mon the Toog wagon is ass
That being said, I don't like my vote on Toog, and I've already stated my piece about Greeting. And it could very well be that I haven't been as critical of Greeting's posts because I'm just used to his style. But I just don't see red there.
I guess you're telling me that it's better play to hammer there because that's how you've been trained?In post 549, anahit wrote:better question is why it shifted hard to greeting
i hammered because it was going through and i figured with the lack of actual wording dedicated to what exactly happens and how compulsive eliminations happens here as opposed to it being explained to us in previous games that hammering was better than not doing so just to be safe
I see where you're coming from now. The hammer itself I thought needed to be addressed, but your initial response confused me. You're talking about MT's games in particular, we don't want a random lim, gotcha. I guess I was just assuming, I know shouldn't do, the lim would fall to the plurality.In post 562, anahit wrote:no? i am trying to tell you that i hammered because, despite knowing there are compulsive eliminations, we were not actually informed as to what happens at deadline without meeting the 7 votes, unlike last morning tweet gameIn post 561, Galron wrote:I guess you're telling me that it's better play to hammer there because that's how you've been trained?In post 549, anahit wrote:better question is why it shifted hard to greeting
i hammered because it was going through and i figured with the lack of actual wording dedicated to what exactly happens and how compulsive eliminations happens here as opposed to it being explained to us in previous games that hammering was better than not doing so just to be safe
so while it's safe to assume that it works the same, as that seems 99% to me,
the other 1% is like, but what if we were not told for gameplay reasons, which would probably always mean there was incentive for someones to prevent majority, which is pretty much never going to be town aligned
so if it worked like, mafia picks elimination in case of no majority or whatever, then it is better to hammer
so 99% it is the same and 1% it is better to hammer
was pretty much the extent of my thought process
I don't know. Just your wagon position on greeting and then you voting edensflame for having a vote on you yesterday. It's pretty weak both ways actually since the more I think about it it seems mafia would be more likely to know they weren't hammering greeting maybe? But I don't know if that logic follows either. But I do think your vote on edensflame is weak. This game is driving me a bit batty as nothing is making sense to me and really hasn't since the beginning other than greeting was town, which I was pretty certain of. Green hat maybe? Have we done that one yet?
You saying there appeared to be consensus that two scum were on Greeting -- yeah, that's a real question. I see someone else has questioned that same thing. So I don't know why you think it's explained by context or how you came to that conclusion, and not the conclusion that there were two scum on Greeting but that that seemed to be the consensus feeling.In post 666, mc esther wrote:i dont think prodding at me with weird points trivially explained by context, or anahit with questions about frankly the least alignment-indicative hammer possible (and then? voting dwlee?) is where he's at as town.
The hammer by ani needed to be explained. I mean, I didn't cotton on to what she did there until she did explain it. And it made complete sense given previous Tweetie games, even if the giving of the explanation itself wasn't strictly AI, although I'd say if true, it's town indicative for her.
Don't pay much mind to my vote on dwlee right now. It's kinda just there as a placeholder until I get my bearings.
Look, I get that I haven't been as active today as I was yesterday, but I've got reasons for that that have nothing to do with this game. Well, little to do with it. At least the pace has picked up a bit from where we were yesterday. Anyway, I may or may not be more active going forward. There's stuff going on IRL, and this hasn't been a priority this week.
From taking a quick look at the past small cap day's posts, I'm still not figuring this game out very well. I'm not a fan of wagoning toogs. I get the impression that they're being wagoned in part because they were the counter to greeting in addition to Radical Rat's play. Both may be valid reasons to wagon them, but it doesn't feel right to me. Right now I'd say my most negative reads are probably on Isis and Pooky but I can't really figure out the words why right now. Ani is probably town, or at least I lean that way.
Well, see that's a problem because I really am not liking anyone other than anahit except for toogs, but that is tempered by their predecessor, and maybe Cakez.In post 683, Isis wrote:I felt good about Cakez day 1 but I feel less good about him day 2, I'm surprised you're inverted Galron
What are you liking?
Pointing on the umpteenth reason to townread anahit seemed kind of more benefitting-to-scum-than-town to me
I can certainly why someone with one town read benefits scum, but I can't tell from your post whether you think I'm scum because I have just one town read, because I have just one town read and I've mentioned that I townread her at least twice, because other people have evinced a town read on her and I just needlessly contributed to it or whether you're accusing me of scum-siding at all and I'm just inadvertently helping scum by throwing more laurel-leaves anahit's way.
I'm also wondering what intrigues you about fake pedits. As in whether you've just not thought of the concept prior to what you believe to be an inferred accusation of having done that or something else.
In addition, I'm curious as to why my read of Cakez doesn't align with yours.
And while I'm thinking about it, I need to look at the plist again to make sure I do, indeed, have just one town read because that may have changed. In particular I want to read Cakez because your mentioning of that read to me makes me wonder more things. And now that I think about it, I may have a better handle on this game than what I was thinking a few hours ago.
This was supposed to say I'm curious why my read of Cakez not aligning with yours is a concern. But the other question is valid too.In post 684, Galron wrote:In addition, I'm curious as to why my read of Cakez doesn't align with yours.
Yeah... that part was actually the start of a new thought and should've been it's own post, it wasn't directed at you so much as at the game. My fault for not splitting that up.In post 692, mc esther wrote:i didnt mention activity and fwiw, i dont think i would ever go after you over activity.
I'm not sure why I was a scum read to begin with, maybe you said it but I don't remember, so okay I guess I need to take a look at that to figure this out.In post 691, Isis wrote:I've started feeling like you're town this day phase even though you were one of my stronger scumreads. I don't think you have partners in this game, it seems like, and your reads kind of align with mine some. You disagree about Toog but I can see the other direction on them too? And you feel uninformed enough.In post 684, Galron wrote:Well, see that's a problem because I really am not liking anyone other than anahit except for toogs, but that is tempered by their predecessor, and maybe Cakez.In post 683, Isis wrote:I felt good about Cakez day 1 but I feel less good about him day 2, I'm surprised you're inverted Galron
What are you liking?
Pointing on the umpteenth reason to townread anahit seemed kind of more benefitting-to-scum-than-town to me
I can certainly why someone with one town read benefits scum, but I can't tell from your post whether you think I'm scum because I have just one town read, because I have just one town read and I've mentioned that I townread her at least twice, because other people have evinced a town read on her and I just needlessly contributed to it or whether you're accusing me of scum-siding at all and I'm just inadvertently helping scum by throwing more laurel-leaves anahit's way.
I'm also wondering what intrigues you about fake pedits. As in whether you've just not thought of the concept prior to what you believe to be an inferred accusation of having done that or something else.
In addition, I'm curious as to why my read of Cakez doesn't align with yours.
And while I'm thinking about it, I need to look at the plist again to make sure I do, indeed, have just one town read because that may have changed. In particular I want to read Cakez because your mentioning of that read to me makes me wonder more things. And now that I think about it, I may have a better handle on this game than what I was thinking a few hours ago.
anahit in like the next post is right that i was shading Cakez. The totality of the circumstances for him overemphasizing the townread is off, your mentioning it more than once is fine.
fake pedits intrigue me because I think I just straight up have never considered that you could fake a pedit that it is a thing you could choose to do. Just kind of like. "Wow actually you could play a Goblin Guide and block with it no one actually ever implied you can't do that but like oh you can do that wow" So yes when shiki implied it that was the first I've ever thought of it.
And now that you and ani have reoriented me on the post re Cakez, I can see where you're coming from but I don't know that it's as concerning as all that, but I'm going to look at it again. I'm not really all that curious as to which of our reads may align, well maybe I am, but I am wondering whether we got there in similar fashion because I don't feel you at all, your presence seems distant? Like when you post generally there's substance but it doesn't feel like you have a dog in the fight. But you're not the only one I can say that of.
Pick a number between 1 and 10.In post 805, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I will toss you a bone Dwlee.
I am town and we are currentlywinning
I'm thinking it's either Cakez or him. That Cakez was off of both wagons is compelling. Like Cakez said I don't think you do that to Isis.
Cakez are you scum?
I feel like such an idiot with shiki looking on like I should be aspiring to be a better mafia player. I don't know what it is with her. She makes me want to be better at mafia but I am so terrible. It's like the docs at Mayo who took away my cancer. They're just on a higher level. I think that's where shiki is.
The hood locks at daystart. I picked the Mad Hatters the first night, or second, whichever night they were killed, because the other night I forgot to get a pick in to Tweet. Then I think it was Night 3 I had Isis, and she was limmed the next day quicker than I thought it was going to happen so I didn't get a pick into Tweet until twilight, and she wouldn't count it, so I didn't have a neighbor that night. I had actually picked Pooky for that. And then obviously I picked Cakez for last night. I get a message whenever I get a link to a hood whether the person I selected is nobility. Obviously none of my picks were. With Cakez it didn't matter cause all the nobles were dead anyway.
Isis would draw a card, then she had to jump up and down however many times the card said face value. Like 1-10 and then jQK was 11-13. If she completed the jumps, that was her score for the round. I would then have to go to the store and buy a few packages of Keebler Club Crackers and I'd eat however many crackers I could in however many seconds equaled to the number of times she jumped up and down. If I ate less than that number or more than that number, that would be my score for that round. We played four rounds I think, and she ended up winning.
I'm not going to mollify you. I've explained what we did over and over again. I've explained how the game worked. That's all there was to it. I really don't care if you vote for Cakez or not right now even though it's gamethrowing if you vote me. Why would I make something like this up? Ask Cakez about how I tried to make him feel comfortable in the hood. That was a larp as well.
What I was getting at was if you're town and vote for me, you're gamethrowing. That was part of that sentence.In post 1079, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:you kind of did say thisIn post 1063, Galron wrote:I really don't care if you vote for Cakez or not right now
Achromatic Murmur.In post 1095, Galron wrote:Achromatic MurmerIn post 1090, SirCakez wrote:Galron what is the name of your role? if you can share that
Here I didn't know what rp was but figured it out.In post 296, anahit wrote:like scum have to like, construct thought processes/create temporal dissonance/give the appearance of being towns et cetera, which if you are looking for like input/output type thing it's more in for same out for the mafias and you can kinda tell in posts sometimes though we as a whole collectively as mafia players as definitely worse at this than any of us give the impression of being during a game (especially me!!!)In post 293, anahit wrote:pretty sure vanderscamp means how it is difficult to determine if mad hatters posts feel scummy in the way they are constructed because coming from scum or because of their posting style, the alliteration and so forth, which also takes like, similar things to put togetherIn post 291, Galron wrote:What's this?In post 252, Vanderscamp wrote:the constructed nature of the RP
but if you are also making your posts sound nice (even at the cost of meaning sometimes) before posting it makes trying to make this sort of determination very difficult
I'm just going to turn my head and hope for the best.
VOTE: SirCakez
I thought Cakez entered the hood on the defensive, but it may just my slant on it because Isis entered it that way too.
Cakez was townie at the beginning of the game, but latter half not so much. Pooky the other way around. The way Day 1 went down was laborious.
I'm just gonna hope I'm not missing something obvious.
VOTE: SirCakez
I thought Cakez entered the hood on the defensive, but it may just my slant on it because Isis entered it that way too.
Cakez was townie at the beginning of the game, but latter half not so much. Pooky the other way around. The way Day 1 went down was laborious.
I'm just gonna hope I'm not missing something obvious.