Mini Normal 2262: NbITGBSMoD [game over]
Forum rules
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
"to seem townie" is the simple answer to any question of the form "why would he do that as scum?" ...In post 170, HockeyFan wrote:Why would Steven do this as scum?retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
right okay, let's see...
You're rightIn post 203, Scorpious wrote:Naked RVS votes suck btw just so you know, it takes zero effort to literally write ANYTHING.
It doesn'tIn post 203, Scorpious wrote:Thats fantastic, how does this progress the game ?
Correct, and correctIn post 203, Scorpious wrote:"probably" and "slightly" mean nothing, you may have just not posted this.. tells us nothing on how you are thinking,
then another seemingly random vote?
YepIn post 203, Scorpious wrote:gut.. so....? "Random"?
It doesn'tIn post 203, Scorpious wrote:What part of impersonating somone "seems townie" to you?
uhhmm so I think this is kind of where scumhunting is more of an art than a science. you have to look beyond the obvious factsIn post 203, Scorpious wrote:Then why are you town leaning on them?
like, the actual towniest thing stephen has done this game was posting a list of scumreads and offering zero explanation for them
It's not that they HAD no explanation. The reads did have reasoning behind them. But in that moment he didn't particularly care to justify them nor care what people thought about them, even when challenged about it. I think that tends to come from town more than mafiaretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
f there's anything you want to know just ask. I don't want to be cagey, I just want to be efficient.In post 296, fireisredsir wrote:wavemode thinks that lack of explanation and not really caring about being questioned is townie, and he gives super casual "yeah so what" responses to scorp and me
the problem with wallposting is, most people don't really read it all anyway. like, not REALLY
so I'm not particularly likely to go into a ton of detail unless you ask me a direct question. tends to be a waste of effort. and I'm lazy, you know? and the questioning process generates useful reactions
and come on, most of those questions in 203 were not real questions, everyone here recognizes that right? even scorpious himself will admit that. he's not a newbie, he knows how RVS works
like honestly tell me, which of those questions besides the last one actually warranted a detailed response. whichever one you think it is, I will happily answer in more detail
if scorp flips scum we will look back on the fact that I was able to provoke him to post that ridiculous 203, as a game-winning playretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
217 is slightly bad, to me. it feels like a "low hanging fruit" read, a read you write when you're trying to come up with a reason to townread someone. like "oh of course I would townread these guys because they participated in RVS ending". I meeeean, would you? really? people are rarely genuinely that naive. also, no mention of scorp, who quite literally did end RVSIn post 353, fireisredsir wrote:i cannot imagine why anyone would have an eyes without a face read in either direction unless they are process of elimination sorting, but we can ignore that for now
that alone probably wouldn't amount to a scumlean if eyes had gone on to contribute more after that. but no, even with all the shit that was going on in the game at the time, all we got from eyes was that pointless comment. and yet his last visited time on the site is 8 hours later. never decided to come back and give more thoughts. hmretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
I don't fully follow 65. I get it, andante said 27 was scummy and some people agreed. you're just going to sheep that as your whole reason for voting hockey? there's a lot more in hockeyfan's ISO than 27 and 155In post 352, fireisredsir wrote:
explain the nero read? an answer of "ehh idk gut" will no longer be acceptedIn post 349, wavemode wrote:nero cain, scorpious, eyes without a face are giving me scum vibes
and I don't follow his 197 either. nero himself seems unsure of stephen's alignment, and unsure of the motive for his aggression, in his own 255. so why is hockeyfan being unsure of that such a problem. also, hockeyfan is nowhere near the only person who said they felt the argument was NAI. and also also, his basic argument that this behavior is scummy doesn't really make a ton of sense. overall this feels like a big reach to justify his wagon position
every time nero posts I feel like I keep asking myself whether he's really trying to solve this game, or just trying to appear like he is. and I keep arriving at the latter being more likely, when I compare this game to past games I've played with him
also, more generally: my knee-jerk reaction to your question is to counter-question, why does a scum read NEED to not be gut? Let's say my nero read had been pure gut. I think if I were actively trying to convince people to vote nero with me, the discussion of whether I have logical reasoning becomes more relevant. but if it's just a gut read and I'm not even voting him, I don't quite see what the problem with that is. I guess I'm just trying to understand where you're coming from with this post? I will probably have gut reads in the future, do you believe they should not be shared?retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
uh I felt like answering both...?In post 357, fireisredsir wrote:wave, you responded to the one i said we could ignore for now and you ignored the direct question asking for a responseretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
well, I'm not "use"ing anything. I'm not voting you or trying to wagon you and I'm not super certain you're scum, you just currently seem more likely than most of the game. but if you're asking me my working theory for scum!scorp, right now I feel like it's a reasonable possibility that you wanted to throw shade and perhaps try to drum up momentum for a mislynch wagon, then changed your mind after my response. So of course your stated rationale would become, "I just wanted to see how he would respond". but, eh, 21 and 203 don't really feel like that to me. the two posts, especially taken together, feel more like suspicion than fact-findingIn post 354, Scorpious wrote:If you are going to use this,you should also use the other rationale I had behind it. I'm not accusing you of partial quoting or mis repping,but its close but I've said twice now,and you just re-iterated. I wasn't pressing you at all. As I have aid I wanted to see how you would respond.retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
Well, no. I get that *andante* said it was scummy. But that doesn't mean I find it scummy (personally I'm leaning town on hockey), and that certainly doesn't mean I like nero sheeping that reasoningIn post 364, Frozen Angel wrote:Like, the first sentence is contradicting itself. if you get that the post was scum read/scummy, what's weird about it being voted? Just cause someone else also had the read, nero couldn't say the same thing?retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
lol if we want to play THAT game of wifom, one could argue that as scum I would probably just not share a read if it was just gut. but as town I still think it's worthwhile if people know where my head is atIn post 366, fireisredsir wrote:no, but you should be prepared to explain them when asked. gut always comes from somewhere. i think you'd respond in different ways to me asking you to have more of a reason than gut depending on your alignment, so that's my motivation behind asking
and no I don't think gut ALWAYS comes from somewhere, certainly not necessarily always somewhere from which it can be put into words adequatelyretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
again, it was the sheeping, frozen, the sheeping. and not just in isolation, it is in the context of the rest of his play. this game it all seems lazyIn post 368, Frozen Angel wrote:why is nero finding it scummy giving you scum vibes on nero but you didn't get same vibes from andante?retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
I already mentioned all the issues I had with it, namely that he himself recognizes that there are many different possibilities for his motivations, and the fact that several other people besides hockeyfan also considered it NAIFrozen Angel wrote:and he clearly gave a read on the interaction in 255 even though its not a certain read (there is no such thing as a certain read without role actions btw) which is opposite to hookie calling it directly not AI at all.
uuh because it's not purely a gut read? I don't understand this questionFrozen Angel wrote:and if its a gut read just insist that its a gut read. why would you wanna force reasons for your read?
is this whole back and forth going to be a constant "I think grass is good because it's green" and then you respond "why do you think grass is good just because it's red?"Frozen Angel wrote:How is having the same idea about some post scum indicative?
as I already said, it's not the read, it's the *lazy play*retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
I think the meaning of what I'm saying is still just not coming across here.In post 381, Frozen Angel wrote:considering several different possibilities is solving. calling something NAI is different. So you having the same idea as others about that conversation being NAI, is by your logic lazy play/sheeping and a scummy act?
NAI = it would not be out of the ordinary for either alignment to do it. right? so there's two completely separate possibilities. that's what I mean by possibilities.
And so if someone is not leaning more in favor of one possibility or the other, like several people in this game currently, then what they are saying is that the action was NAI. it did not, in isolation, indicate alignment, and so can only be considered in the context of further (or past) observation
I still don't really understand the question. Why can't I make two separate statements in a single post?In post 381, Frozen Angel wrote:about the second part, Why would you say that about gut reads then? I don't understand why you had to explain how you don't have to explain gut reads in detail right after giving logic about the read (and saying that it wasn't pure gut read). Seems like a contradictory pov.retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
I read what you're doing, yes, but you're ignoring large swathes of each of my sentences in order to do itIn post 381, Frozen Angel wrote:How do you read our back and forth right now?retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
lol well let's use the latest example:In post 388, Frozen Angel wrote:which parts did I ignore
your question here is ignoring the very fundamental question I was asking fire, namely:In post 387, Frozen Angel wrote:The read was a semi gut read but had a reason behind it right? So what was your point in adding that part about how gut reads don't need reason after giving (I still think forced) reasons about it?
In post 360, wavemode wrote:I will probably have gut readsin the future, do you believe they should not be shared?retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
I was simply asking fire a question. If you dislike the question, good news! it wasn't to you, it was to fireIn post 391, Frozen Angel wrote:How is that response about not providing reasons for gut reads is relevant to that question?
if what you dislike is *where* I put the question, I apologize profusely for the offense and in the future I promise to separate my questions from my statements whenever feasibleretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
uhm okay you *participated* in the ending of RVS, even though technically a non-RVS vote had already been cast a few minutes beforehand. would that be more accurate?
retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
this is weird, tonally. I struggle to see how this particular statement was of any pain to you. is participating in RVS ending somehow damaging to your reputation?In post 395, Scorpious wrote:again, just would like to know where I said this.. I'm dealing with 2 mis reps at the same time and neither of you will acknowledge it.
you participating in ending RVS has nothing to do with me scumreading you (how could it?), I simply said that in the context of the fact that eyes didn't mention it in his townreads
so why is this such a problem you're "dealing with"?
Well, no, I wouldn't have. I thought you ended RVS. So thank you for pointing that out to me.In post 397, Scorpious wrote:I would say so,... Thats a far cry from saying I "literally ended RVS" and using it as an argument as well.
Now I'm wondering if you would have ever corrected it, had I not called you out on it.
But it doesn't really change the argument. I think eyes could still probably mention the player who said "oops did I end RVS" on page 1 of the game, if he's on a spree of townreading people who like to end RVS. right? is that unreasonable? or at least mention why you were the exception?retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
I don't really want to vote hockeyfan because I've seen signs of him genuinely trying to understand and solve the game (for example, but not limited to, 155 and 170 and 371 and 407) and they feel more like town trying to understand people's motivations than scum try to throw shadeIn post 439, Stephen A Smith wrote:We need to book him for my ESPN Live debate show then
@WaveMode are you ready to defend your boy HockeyFan?
and I'm not really convinced by the reasons I've seen for people scumreading him. maybe very *very* early in the game I could kind of see where some people were coming from in terms of tone? but I think he's been pretty consistent in that tone, to the point where I could say it's just genuinely reflective of how he thinks and writes, and not a symptom of scum intent
oh and there was that meta thing with fire? look I admire the spirit going deep meta on like page 1 of the game but ehhh after reading those games I don't personally find the evidence convincing (and meta evidence is not particularly reliable to start with, so there's also that)retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
at the moment I'm willing to vote eyes or scorpious. though I think overall eyes is our best lynch
it's a fallacy to assume (as some have) that just because someone hasn't posted a lot that must mean we don't have enough information to lynch them. eyes has done plenty and none of it is good
to the point where it's like they're not even really reading the game? or intentionally avoiding having to participate in it. ahhh let's face it lurker or not this flips scum more often than not
pedit: well yeah, I pointed out that exact problem I had with eyes's 217 all the way back in my 355retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
they are simply the two players who I think are overall least likely to be town here
what that means regarding their partnership and/or the setup is impossible to know, however
so trying to evaluate them in terms of whether or not I think they are partners with each other is strategically unsoundretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
I don't townread people because I'm worried they might be partners with someone else I scumread. that's just not logically soundIn post 490, Greeting wrote:Scorpious has just pointed out to me, in 469, what I believe was his perceived shallowness of my read on Eyes with out a face. I openly admitted to not having focused on them much. If they're both scum, why would he do that to his partner?
what if scorpious just did that to make himself look good after eyes flips? he's been playing mafia for years, he's not a noob
or what if they are both scum but not aligned with each other? we don't know the setup
or, hey, let's assume you're right and one of them is town. how could I possibly know which one it is? how could I use that to townread one of them? I would have to make a lot of baseless assumptions to come to such a conclusionretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
well, no. I said lynching eyes, in this game, is more likely to be successful than not. not lurkers in generalIn post 491, Scorpious wrote:You’re proclaiming that limming the lurker is more often successful than not.
and I specifically said that it's because of eyes's actual play, not their level of activity
all I was saying regarding activity was that the fact that they are less active should not mean they're immune from suspicionretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
well, nothing happened to the nero sus. I would say he's still near the bottom for meIn post 500, HockeyFan wrote:wave, can u explain the progression between 349 and 485(what happend to the nero sus). Cuz u didnt mention them much between these two logs
but I guess what you're getting at is, if he's near the bottom for me, that must mean I want to lynch him today? to which I would say, no that's not really the case. I'm more confident in my eyes and scorpious scumreadsretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
yeah and that strategy just doesn't usually work. without flips there's no way to know what one person's interactions with another person actually mean. and the more you try to assume you know what they mean, the more likely you end up with completely shitty reads altogetherIn post 514, Greeting wrote:Guessing what that plan is can be a strategy for town to figure out whom the team is
you say you've never seen scum express suspicion of each other day 1 but I have, I've seen it a lot. in fact I've done it. in fact I've seen scum HARD bus, and successfully lynch, each other day 1. I've probably seen it all at this point
two people who are both acting scummy, can both be scum, regardless of what they are saying about each other. it is completely illogical to assume otherwise
this paragraph is bizarre. I was the first person to express suspicion of eyes and I was the first person to express suspicion of scorpious. neither of them was "up for elimination". and "openly refusing to reflect further" is... ???? because I have a different scum reading strategy than you, that means I'm not reflecting?In post 514, Greeting wrote:Sorry, but I am just not buying this explanation. You say that Scorpious is not a noob, but you're no noob either and this just seems like you've picked two players lined up for elimination and stuck with them while openly refusing to reflect further on that at all. And that is more likely to come from scum and town. My vote on you stands.retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
former Lions QB Matthew Stafford winning today would be the closest Detroit will ever come to superbowl gloryIn post 603, Stephen A Smith wrote:Rams are a four point favorite but Joey B is my Boy
so my heart is with the ramsretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
eyes's suspicion of dwlee feels more like deflection than the product of some sort of reaction test
in fact throughout his whole ISO I still have zero reason to believe he has actually followed the game at any point and formed any genuine reads on anyone based on any actual content
everything he's done lately is just an aggressive reaction to him being run up on votes to try to avoid being eliminatedretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
huh? there was just an entire discussion about his mentioning the replacements theory being a reaction test, which he then claims dwlee had a scummy reaction to. that does not look like someone being straightforward about doing nothingIn post 651, fireisredsir wrote:i disagree, i don't see any intention from him of trying to appear like he's solving the game. he seems to be very straightforward about doing nothing. it makes him a not very useful player, yes, but does it make him scum? if it continues, then calling for him to be elimmed on principle is one thing, but it seems not necessary on day 1
are we reading the same ISO? where is he "straightforward about doing nothing"?retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
well then someone should tell overkill that
retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
allow me to summarize eyes without a lawyer's ISO. he:
1. supposedly townreads dwlee and andante for helping the game get out of RVS. he does not give any further opinions on the events of the game thus far. I took issue with this in my 355
2. rejoins the game after a long absence and states he tends to be suspicious of replacement slots. he gives no reads. some people do not like this. some people vote him
3. claims that offering the theory was just "indirect pressure" and that it supposedly got a scummy reaction out of dwlee
4. the rest of his ISO is him defending himself. his vote count reaches L-3. he neither votes dwlee nor offers any reads or opinions on anyone else
I really have a hard time seeing this progression as town. if he didn't want to seem like he was playing the game then 1 and 3 would not have taken place
what I am left with is that he is indeed playing the game but he's not aligned with us
then you and I have different definitions of nothing. to me 1 does not equal 0In post 656, fireisredsir wrote:one original thought is basically nothing, yes. he's spent most of the time since then giving the bare minimum of responses to people questioning him, and making salty comments that directly or indirectly reference people's suspicions of him and get us nowhere. he's not literally doing nothing, he's just been unashamedly putting very little effort into making his own content or opinions (when asked to, he just complains about how people will find him suspicious for it, which, eyeroll), and i do not at all see the narrative of a scum player trying to look good. where is this "clearly wants to appear like he is solving it"?retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
in order from most likely to least likely town:In post 659, the worst wrote:wave what are your other reads?
fireisredsir
Stephen A Smith
Dwlee99
HockeyFan
Greeting
Frozen Angel
Andante
the worst
Umlaut
Nero Cain
Scorpious
Eyes without a faceretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
then you should probably find where I ever stated that my problem with eyes is laziness (or that I think he's lazy in the first place)In post 664, the worst wrote:
laziness is just a rife part of human nature, lol. town are lazy as often as scum are lazy. it's something that looks bad, which means it's easy to ramble about how it's bad!!!!, but i'm really not convinced that it's any more likely to come from either alignment. scum have a tendency to try and exploit things which look bad rather than things which are actually indicators of a scum mindset. => i think wave is just picking at an easy target.In post 662, HockeyFan wrote:Why do you think laziness is not a good reason for player X to sus player Y
you either aren't reading what I'm saying or aren't understanding the point I'm trying to make about himretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
right now I want to eliminate either scorpious or eyesIn post 665, the worst wrote:sry i probably asked a kinda useless question since i haven't read up yet; can you talk to me about other enpassioned reads? what else are you seeing in the gamestate? i guess the point i'm making is that like, if we're trying to solve the same puzzle, then your eyes read isn't very useful to me atm. what else is making your mind fire?retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
you aren't. in fact I'd say I've consistently said the opposite about eyes to what you seem to think I'm sayingIn post 668, the worst wrote:I'm summarising your point for sure
he's scumIn post 668, the worst wrote:where are u at on Scorpius?retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
what's different is that fire gets what I'm saying about eyes. he just doesn't agree with itIn post 670, the worst wrote:how do you consider what fire and what I am seeing about your push against eyes as meaningfully different? Im genuinely confused and its been a long time since ive felt this confounded trying to have a convo with someone about a pretty routine mafia read lol
you don't seem to get it at all
these are all of the posts I've made about eyes: 355, 399. 485, 646, 650, 657
I don't know how to prove a negative. it'd be more useful if you could point out to me where in here you seem to believe that my issue with eyes is laziness
because if you actually read the posts, I think you'll instead find that overall my position has been that he has indeed been trying to participate in the game, but there are substantive issues with that participation which lead me to believe he is scum. that's not laziness, that's scumminess. (and that's part of what I specifically mentioned in 657, the fact that if he truly just doesn't care and doesn't want to participate in the game, then he wouldn't be TRYING to seem like he's participating like in points 1 and 3 - instead he would just not participate)
I'd be happy to share my thoughts on scorp with you. I'm just worried that you'll ignore what I write and instead conclude that what I'm actually trying to say is that scorp is just lazyIn post 670, the worst wrote:why is scorp scum
first and foremost, scorpious's 203 is a shitshow. just a lot a of very nitpicky shade. he himself later walked back the post (in his 248), claiming it was just a reaction test (to get my tone and writing style). I explained in my 363 that I did not really believe this rationale given the context of 21 and 203 taken together. it seems more likely he was targeting me for elimination for a while. (which, hey, he can come after me if he wants. but do it with your chest! and with actual arguments. don't go back on it and say it was just a reaction test)
scorpious also generally reads to me like he's putting on a show. 333 feels melodramatic. if you scumread andante, alright dude just scumread her. why all the "this isn't adding up" and "I'm not comfortable with this" theatrics
in fact the whole progression to voting andante in 332, 333, 335, 337, and 347 feels like manufactured outrage. in fact a good analogy for it is the thing you were saying about laziness, how laziness *looks* bad but you also need to justify why it's actually scummy. similarly, the things he got so upset about in those posts look slightly bad, sure, but he never really gets around to justifying why they mean andante is scum. iirc andante posted some reads he didn't like? and he asked her a question and she didn't feel like answering it? then she answered it a few posts later anyway... if this is truly enough for someone to become a strong scumread for scorp, there are a lot of other people he should've gone after this game as well. she shouldn't have become his "only scumread" as he said at the time. seems more likely to me he just felt bolstered by how much pressure she was getting from fire and FA at the time and wanted to push on it
and also on the topic of melodramatic tone, I mentioned in my 399 that I didn't like his 395 and 397, which he wrote because at some point I stated that he was the one who ended RVS (even though what technically happened is that he simply *stated* that he had ended RVS, when in actuality the vote that ended RVS had already been cast a few minutes prior... you can read page 1 of the game if you're curious). personally I feel like he got overly confrontational about me misremembering such a minor detail. I can see this coming from scum feeling like "gotcha! caught him in a lie, now everyone will be on my side" without stopping to consider the lack of significance of what he'd found
it's probably also worth mentioning that scorpious's read on me has flipped from initially suspicious of me (in 21 and 203), to town (220), then back to null (362), then back to town (401), though given the post he just wrote above I'm guessing it's moving back down again if you haven't noticed, these changes tend to be opportunistically correlated with how much heat I'm getting from other players at the timeretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
I disagree with this. But also, that wasn't even my point. I'm not saying it means he's necessarily town, I'm saying it means there could be utility in keeping him alive, at least until later in the gameIn post 686, fireisredsir wrote:i don't think that him saying he is a backup has any effect on the likelihood of him being town
or perhaps at that later stage, we then decide/discover his role is not plausible and then eliminate him with the comfortable certainty that he was lyingretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
ehhh if his tone was consistent I could be led to believe he's just a dramatic person, sureIn post 682, fireisredsir wrote:my scorpio take is that i read some of 2252 and 2257 and thought he looked scummy in both, and one of them he was maf and one of them he was town. and as for the melodrama, there was plenty of that in the town game. so im not really sure how to read him this game. at first i didn't notice him much, he seemed pretty normal (and i liked how he was sus of wave since i was too), but i think it was weird how much he was ignoring the main wagons until i called him out on it
mostly i just want to hockey lim and then sort everyone else out later cause my brain gets stuck thinking about people based on how they've acted in relation to the wagons
but I feel like we've seen two completely different versions of scorpious this game
sometimes he's this calm and collected "I use prose and syntax and differential calculus to very carefully and gradually determine who is scum and who is town"
and other times he's this very dramatic and surface-level "how DARE you not answer my question the first time I asked it! thou scum!!"
and I feel like the transitions between the two have occurred purely at opportunistic timesretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
FWIW I've *been* a backup in a normal gameIn post 740, Andante wrote:I don't think I've ever seen a backup in a normal gameretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
"no real conviction" what does that mean exactly?In post 864, Scorpious wrote:Alright,here is the deal, I do not thave the patience to cut and clip to make points. If you think thats AI,fine.
I just dont have patience.
My main problem with them is that is basically like watching commentary on whats going on with no real conviction, they do put togther reads toward the end,but thats expected.
I also dont like how it's so condensed,perhaps to cause this exact problem,whats wrong with posting as you read?
If you want to go through it and ask me how I feel specifically about something,please ask . I'm just time and technically limited to really express specefics. sorry.retired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
yes, I did lol that exact quote appears in your postIn post 876, Scorpious wrote:
did you quote the right post?In post 870, wavemode wrote:
"no real conviction" what does that mean exactly?In post 864, Scorpious wrote:Alright,here is the deal, I do not thave the patience to cut and clip to make points. If you think thats AI,fine.
I just dont have patience.
My main problem with them is that is basically like watching commentary on whats going on with no real conviction, they do put togther reads toward the end,but thats expected.
I also dont like how it's so condensed,perhaps to cause this exact problem,whats wrong with posting as you read?
If you want to go through it and ask me how I feel specifically about something,please ask . I'm just time and technically limited to really express specefics. sorry.
and I'm not entirely sure what you meant by itretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
the fact that you think that is exactly why scum would do it
I can link you games where scum did it, since you seem to not have been lied to enough and thus are too trusting of humanityretired...?- wavemode
-
wavemode Mafia Scum
- wavemode
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: May 30, 2017
I regularly see scum try to act like they don't care if people vote them. it's such a common tactic it really just doesn't phase me anymoreIn post 883, Greeting wrote:Go ahead! I'll read them.
in a mini normal I played a while back, here's flavor leaf (boonskies) self-voting as scum: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... 8#p9543318
a decent last-ditch effort, all things considered. he knew he was probably going down anyway (kind of like eyes knows he is now). though, it worked. GR was eliminated instead (though GR was also scum lol)
and here's eyes without nostrils himself! playing scum and very overdramatically threatening to self vote, "to help you all see the light": https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p10911685
it did not work though, he was still eliminated day 1 that gameretired...? - wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode
- wavemode