KTaNE [game over!]
Forum rules
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
With regard to the setup: the town alternate win condition is highly unlikely to be reached, given the sheer number of successes required and the influence scum can have over the process, either by sending one of their own to defuse the bomb or having a scum expert intentionally fail the defusal. The alternate scum win condition, by comparison, is frightfully easy to achieve. I suggest failing defusals by default, unless the scum select a defuser who is a consensus townread. While in effect this is gifting scum a free regular nightkill, it gates it so that scum can only kill people who are otherwise suspects, which is ultimately a pro-town move.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
and yet it's still more efficient than your postcount padding word vomitIn post 23, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:so many words catboi tsk tsk- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Might want to see a doctor about your NarcolepsyIn post 26, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
i almost fell asleep reading itIn post 24, catboi wrote:
and yet it's still more efficient than your postcount padding word vomitIn post 23, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:so many words catboi tsk tsk- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
The scum are the ones choosing the defusers, please go read the setup again. It's not functionally an elimination but unless someone is towncore there's no point saving them from a nightkill.In post 34, VP Baltar wrote:
oh like use them as a double elim?In post 33, GuiltyLion wrote:well even if they were mandatory somehow, we'd just intentionally give bad info if we decide we want to fail all bombs by default
I'll shrug and take this as plausibly uninformed, good enough for page 2.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Baffling read.In post 66, Frogsterking wrote:PEDit: StrangeMatters is already out of their scum range by the way, slight townread on StrangeMatters from me.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
This is incorrect on multiple counts (the voting for expert does not only count town votes, that would be straightforwardly gamebreaking for obvious reasons. The number of experts selected on night 1 is 8, not 4)In post 85, Greeting wrote:I think I found out a potential way to bend the game mechanics to our advantage.
We know that scums select the bomb defuser.
We also know that we select the bomb experts.
Which gives me an idea.
We could all decide to nominate just one person each.
This way, on Day 1, we all could get 3 players to nominate a single player and end up with 6 candidates. (6*3=18; one player is left I suppose)
We also know that there will be 4 experts whom will be selected and we will know that they were selected because they had the most town votes.Town votes, not all votes.
By doing this, we will know that at least one of the players in each grouping who nominated a player that did not get selected to be a bomb expert is scum simply because their vote was not counted.
Example:
Players in the game {A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S}
Nominations for player A: {A, B, C}
Nominations for player B: {D, E, F}
Nominations for player C: {G, H, I}
Nominations for player D: {J, K, L}
Nominations for player E: {M, N, O}
Nominations for player F: {P, Q, R}
S is left.
Night 1 we find out that the players selected were: {A, B, C, D}. Which means that scums must have been in the {M, N, O} and {P, Q, R} group who voted to nominate E and F.
I can see a potential problem though: what if the scums decide to spread amongst the groups nominating C, D, E and F? How will the tie be resolved then?
A for effort though.
HEAL: Greeting
for functional purposes I will equate this to a townread, there may be more practical considerations on who to nominate for an expert but those can come later.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Code: Select all
[heal][/heal]
Simple as that.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I would encourage you to read slightly more critically:In post 94, Greeting wrote:
The rules say that:In post 90, catboi wrote: This is incorrect on multiple counts (the voting for expert does not only count town votes, that would be straightforwardly gamebreaking for obvious reasons. The number of experts selected on night 1 is 8, not 4)
A for effort though.
HEAL: Greeting
for functional purposes I will equate this to a townread, there may be more practical considerations on who to nominate for an expert but those can come later.
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Don't fakeclaim mason, thanks in advance
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
We do not get to decide on the defusers, only the experts.In post 116, Morning Tweet wrote:i understand it's prolly not decided but are we trying to put town or scum in the defuser's seat
Although ultimately the composition of the group of experts is not that important because the rules force us to cycle through experts in a way that makes the selection of scum highly likely, starting by selecting townreads today is perfectly fine - it prevents them from being selected for defusal by the mafia and gives them a neighborhood they can use.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Had I rolled scum this game my goal would have been to propose something more or less like the former, playing it like resistance, and blitz the alternate win condition. Four successes is a small amount and it's certainly easier than trying to cut through an enormous amount of townies with a limited supply of nightkills. I would think there's at least a few other players in this game who'd think that way.In post 143, Morning Tweet wrote:What is the biggest factor preventing us from just sending people to try and be bomb experts, like in resistance, have them try to succeed, and if there's a failure, it's guaranteed someone sabotaged so we still learn something?
If we play the other way, as catboi mentioned, scum gets an additional nightkill and we can't use the system. But we do stop them from being able to achieve their alternate wincon. Is their alternate wincon so likely though? If scum decides the defuser, and they have to put their own members in the defuser spot a bunch of times to win, and they also need to live, won't we notice that? It's gonna be a huge difference if scum nominates consensus townreads in other to nightkill them, versus tries to slip their own members in that chair. At least, to me it would seem that way
I said "fail by default" with the assumption the defuser is unlikely to be a consensus townread and it's more valuable to flip anyone there is some uncertainty about. Saving someone from the bomb should mean you'd be willing to bet the game on them being town.
What I'm trying to say is that reflexively trying to pass/fail people is bad, I suppose, although that's a much less exciting and cool-sounding approach.
I don't particularly mind the discussions at this point because hashing it out is useful and sometimes people can be read off their involvement with the mechanics. (not always necessarily in the obvious Greeting way, but still)Morning Tweet wrote:And yes I'm sorry for probably rehashing what's already been talking about probably but it's the only way i can really participate in mech
The alternate wincons don't seem like something that will get completed, so much as something to make the bombs actually have some kind of stakes. At least, it seems to me that was the design goal anyway. whether or not it can be broken, ill leave up to others- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
The town alternate win condition is vanishingly unlikely to ever take place. To achieve it would require at a minimum 7 night phases. That would guarantee 11 deaths already (7 from elimination, 1 from teh starting nightkill, and 3 from suxccesful town defusals). That puts us at 8 alive at most.This doesn't meaningfully put 'pressure' on scum because they can either put a member up for defusal to deny town the win condition or cause a failure in there, and at that point it can be delayed enough to prevent town from having any possible chance of meaningfully achieving it.In post 196, The Praetorian wrote:Why do you want to push to kill people defusing bombs when its a scum chosen defuser? Now that im understanding the mech more your suggestion feels more anti town.
I am not arguing for unconditionally killing anyone who is selected as a defuser and have clarified the nuance of my position.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Because I don't like you.In post 198, The Praetorian wrote:
Why did you treat vp differently than myself for making a similar mixup btw?In post 35, catboi wrote:
The scum are the ones choosing the defusers, please go read the setup again. It's not functionally an elimination but unless someone is towncore there's no point saving them from a nightkill.In post 34, VP Baltar wrote:
oh like use them as a double elim?In post 33, GuiltyLion wrote:well even if they were mandatory somehow, we'd just intentionally give bad info if we decide we want to fail all bombs by default
I'll shrug and take this as plausibly uninformed, good enough for page 2.
You said you think you'll be able to read me so it's on you if you can't figure out I'm town~In post 199, Menalque wrote:No points for making the easiest read in the world there I’m afraid catboi- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Okay? I'm not sure if you were expecting a comment from me on that, I'm not sure how you think I "overlooked" a post you quoted me replying to.In post 206, The Bulge wrote:@catboiIn post 173, The Bulge wrote:
I don't think the scum alt wincon is as scary as you are making it out to be. certainly not something that can be blitzed. reasons morning already mentioned but i feel this post was overlooked.In post 160, catboi wrote:
Had I rolled scum this game my goal would have been to propose something more or less like the former, playing it like resistance, and blitz the alternate win condition. Four successes is a small amount and it's certainly easier than trying to cut through an enormous amount of townies with a limited supply of nightkills. I would think there's at least a few other players in this game who'd think that way.In post 143, Morning Tweet wrote:What is the biggest factor preventing us from just sending people to try and be bomb experts, like in resistance, have them try to succeed, and if there's a failure, it's guaranteed someone sabotaged so we still learn something?
If we play the other way, as catboi mentioned, scum gets an additional nightkill and we can't use the system. But we do stop them from being able to achieve their alternate wincon. Is their alternate wincon so likely though? If scum decides the defuser, and they have to put their own members in the defuser spot a bunch of times to win, and they also need to live, won't we notice that? It's gonna be a huge difference if scum nominates consensus townreads in other to nightkill them, versus tries to slip their own members in that chair. At least, to me it would seem that wayIn post 143, Morning Tweet wrote:If we play the other way, as catboi mentioned, scum gets an additional nightkill and we can't use the system. But we do stop them from being able to achieve their alternate wincon. Is their alternate wincon so likely though? If scum decides the defuser, and they have to put their own members in the defuser spot a bunch of times to win, and they also need to live, won't we notice that? It's gonna be a huge difference if scum nominates consensus townreads in other to nightkill them, versus tries to slip their own members in that chair. At least, to me it would seem that way
It seems largely the difference of opinion is based around whether we anticipate scum to select obvious town or more uncertain players for the defuser position. I would not support killin a consensus townread that is made defuser, as I have already stated.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I'm not trying to shut you down, I legitimately do not understand the point you are trying to highlight. State it in plain English for me.In post 215, The Bulge wrote:you haven't responded to a point that i feel is pretty damning to your whole position, don't try and shut me down.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Realistically you're going to be stacking the towncore as the expert on night 1, or at least you should. The players outside who are eligible to be defusers are going to be somewhere outside that, either in POE territory or light townleans. I don't really think town's collective ability is good enough to have all the scum players in a POE by the end of day 1 unless the mod rolled an absolute chump scumteam, meaning any scum team member who is somewhere in the territory of null to a townlean would be a reasonably "safe" pick for defuser.In post 218, The Bulge wrote:scum can't just strongarm their wincon without the majority of them being widely townread. it would be very easy to catch on and simply eliminate scum and put a hiatus on defusing bombs.
The consideration here seems to be "yeah we'll be able to tell who is scum nominated for defuser versus town scum wants to kill" and I just think towns are rarely that good. Yes, some townies are just obvious, but I think the incentives motivate scum to not pick those players. (and as I have already said, I would oppose reflexively killing a consensus townread)
Had I rolled scum the plan would be something like put up two buddies to defuse the bomb night 1, possibly bussing a weaker teammate to position them if necessary, send myself as defuser night 2 or 3, maybe stall a night or two but then have a teammate repeat as the defuser if they're still sufficiently townread
Again, this disagreement feels largely theoretical and based around us having different expectations.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Because the counterarguments aren't particularly compelling to me. They assume different things about who scum will nominate and how well town will be able to sort out its reads. At this point since it's all hypothetical we can go in circles for days.In post 233, The Bulge wrote:
i'm more curious about the fact your stance hasn't seemed to change since 21 despite mech discussions dominating large portions of the game so far.In post 229, catboi wrote:Again, this disagreement feels largely theoretical and based around us having different expectations.
Do you think my stance not changing is meaningful for my alignment in some way?- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
People who we vote as experts with the heal tag can be nightkilled, they cannot be set as the defuser. Scum only gain extra nightkills through successful defusals, though. Currently, they only have one.In post 243, Morning Tweet wrote:Ohhhhh so the people we heal cant be killed or set as the defuse then? Ahhhh so in other words itd be much easier for scum to put themselves in the defuse seat. I think I understand you now @catboi
It's kind of up to us the pool scum picks from.. the dilemma makes a lit more sense now.
I've been mainly mehanics talk partly because I haven't had the time to fully focus my attention on the game so any reads are pure gut feeling for the most part. More thought will come when I have time to actually read closely.Andante wrote:so much bomb talk... all I know is if a bomb is in front of me, I'm trying to diffuse it, and if you don't want me doing that, don't pick me. that simple- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Doubtful
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
You're finally learning, at leastIn post 323, Andante wrote:
What's scary is I actually believe the TR on me is a read town!you makes here, but like, I'm not entirely sold on the fact I tr you lolIn post 321, catboi wrote:Andante is probably my second most confident townread after Greeting.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
she selfdestructs under pressure. It's not alignment indicative.In post 415, Bell wrote:
Andante, psychoanalyze this post for me please.In post 394, Andante wrote:I mean, what have you done that I should read into and sort you from? Like, if you expect a TR from "IM ENTERING AND VOTING ANDANTE" think again, cause like, I've been on top of this game, trying my best to sort people, and you literally just "don't care! andante maf!!" like, makes me feel like I'm wasting my time if you are town, so... not a great feeling, cause if I said something you hate, again, feel free to point it out, ask questions...
but yeah, got stuff to do, and if I didn't post my thoughts, yall are getting like an entirely new readslist tomorrow..
And by that I mean, explain where all this angst is coming from.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I think the best thing is to look past stuff like that and look at her analysis. She's enthusiastically solving and trying to analyze with some level of depth, so probably town.In post 425, Bell wrote:Are they using their trauma for good or evil- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
she does the last two as scum lolIn post 437, VP Baltar wrote:
Andante's town game is obvious because she gives a bunch of wild changing reads, buddies up to anyone who calls her town, and omgus anyone who calls her scum. (No disrespect, she just plays a very emotionally transparent game)In post 435, Bell wrote:
I don't have enough meta to know if they can fake enthusiastically solve. I don't have a grasp on their scum game.In post 432, catboi wrote:
I think the best thing is to look past stuff like that and look at her analysis. She's enthusiastically solving and trying to analyze with some level of depth, so probably town.In post 425, Bell wrote:Are they using their trauma for good or evil- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I should give the caveat that my VP Baltar read is mainly "I don't see it" with regard to the scum reads. There's some stuff in the iso that makes me scrunch my nose a bit, some that's okay, nothing that's glaringly bad. I'm not really convinced by your argument that him being self-conscious is scummy and the rest of the votes are for vibes or trying to look townie or whatever. Not really confidently town but, meh.In post 443, Frogsterking wrote:I feel like Pooky would need to have really polished scum play for their current iso to come from scum.
I feel Catboi is TMIing with their VP and Andante reads,but maybe he's just got good reads.
Luke complaining about the catch up and overreacting to my read is a bad look.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I saw enough that I didn't feel like waiting anymore.In post 454, VP Baltar wrote:
Curious why you decoded to drop this read now when you made it sound like you were gonna hold powder for a min. What changed?In post 449, catboi wrote:VOTE: Lukewarm
debated how long I was going to wait for this. Sorry to say that Lukewarm rolled scum this game.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
It's because he's scum, hope this helps~In post 513, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:
Baffled by this Titus townreadIn post 479, Lukewarm wrote:
Oh, and after thatIn post 476, Lukewarm wrote:Titus was my early town read for a dumb reason.I actually found her non-serious mason claim townie, even if I dont like fake mason claiming.
Both from an approach from her towards a possible miselim if he is town, but not in a way that I think scum would do for a partner if he is scum. But also in a similarity in how I've seen her approach games before.
I would say greeting and Titus are my strongest reads of those 5
This is a very bad interpretation of what I said that almost misses the point entirely. The point is not that she isIn post 530, Dwlee99 wrote:
Andante's scum game is perfectly capable and she can do enthusiasm as scum. This is a bad reason to townread her.In post 432, catboi wrote:
I think the best thing is to look past stuff like that and look at her analysis. She's enthusiastically solving and trying to analyze with some level of depth, so probably town.In post 425, Bell wrote:Are they using their trauma for good or evilpostingwith enthusiasm but that hersolvingis enthusiastic. I could go at length to explain
If, in your estimation, she has a "capable" scum game, why is she clearly scum here?
That sh has a tendency to step on rakes is true, but isn't it just as possible that enough people here are familiar with her that they're less likely to misread her? I don't buy at all the argument that more people townreading her makes her scum.In post 530, Dwlee99 wrote:
That people are playing around her like this is actually what makes me think she is scum. She is actually townier as scum and that everyone townreads her when she is normally a controversial day one slot is very scum-indicative imoIn post 509, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I strongly dislike dwlee's Andante push.
Andante feels townish here, and I also know she's kind of an easy mislim having fallen into the trap of tunneling her more than once recently. I think dwlee knows this too.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
He tried to break the game under an incorrect assumption about how the bomb expert votes work.In post 580, VP Baltar wrote:
catboiiiii (or anyone), help me understand this?In post 550, Datisi wrote:Greeting [6]: catboi, Cephrir, Morning Tweet, PookyTheMagicalBear, Lukewarm, Cat Scratch Fever
What's with all the Greeting town reads? Their ISO is just mech talk. What am I missing?
That type of post never comes from scum, if scum believe there's a breaking strategy they don't post it publicly.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
Missed it, apologies. Strong gut feeling, think leaning into mech talk early is scummy for him, the way he spoke about stuff just didn't feel like there was real interest in deciding a plan. I think in his catchup he was overly focused on frogster's read of him and mainly chose to respond to mechanical things that had already been hashed out, commenting for the sake of commenting. I think the pages between the game start and his return had plenty to form reads off but he wasn't able to produce anything substantive.In post 588, VP Baltar wrote:
You answer this catboi?In post 462, VP Baltar wrote:
What did you see?In post 459, catboi wrote:
I saw enough that I didn't feel like waiting anymore.In post 454, VP Baltar wrote:
Curious why you decoded to drop this read now when you made it sound like you were gonna hold powder for a min. What changed?In post 449, catboi wrote:VOTE: Lukewarm
debated how long I was going to wait for this. Sorry to say that Lukewarm rolled scum this game.
I was also kind of tweaked on Luke a little bit because that frogster case was pretty reachy. But I also wasn't super sure if I'm being over critical of him because frog looks town here.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I think the game will go smoother if we just assume people are going to miss things for the first few daysIn post 590, Menalque wrote:I’ll be honest, I’m going to be skimming any pages that happen when I’m asleep at best- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
big oofIn post 610, Lukewarm wrote:
I found it quite funny that strange was asked for a full reads list, and says they have "massively unfinished one" - and then posts a list with e names in a 19 player game lmaoIn post 535, StrangeMatter wrote:Uhh I have a massively unfinished list so people not mentioned are essentially no clues or I have had the chance to look into.
Not willing to vote out
Andante
Would be fine with voting out.
Frogsterking
Dwlee (Partial paranoia but he just feels like how he played in Mini 2265 and I can never get a read on him.
Scum!strange could have easily padded this out at least a little bit, so thinking this is town strange still getting a footing on reads- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
lmaoIn post 624, Menalque wrote:
It’s a social deduction game that involves an uninformed majority putting their wits against an informed minorityIn post 618, Frogsterking wrote:Menalque..I wonder what kind of game you're playing at here..
There are generally two phases, a day phase and a night phase, with a different faction predominating in either
It originally went by the name “werewolf” and originated as a type of party game between university students in Russia
Hope that helps!- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
It's not impossible given she only has 11 posts, although on reading them I actually felt vaguely positive about them. But there's a lot of people who might be mafia right now. It's early still.In post 629, Andante wrote:catboi, am I crazy for thinking Cat might be maf? like, they don't even have a lot of posts, but something there feels really off to me... idk- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
My impression was that your opening to the game was scummy. I could, of course, have been premature in that assessment. We'll see.In post 634, The Praetorian wrote:catboi can stay in null out of spite and ill out my real read later.
keep them out of expert chats bc he doesnt use hoods- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
the townreads from CSF on you and frogsterking are, at this point, uncontroversial, and could come from either alignment. The confidence in those readsIn post 638, Andante wrote:@catboi alright, hmmm, yeah I know only 11 posts, like, it's not a SR I'd die on right now, but it's just, I can't get over the like "perfect takes" like, I'd SR that over bell's "look for yourself" reasoning, idk!! we'll see what happenscouldbe a scum POV but I wouldn't stake anything on it, and on a third reread I like the questioning toward dwlee, in particular 543. I think she's fine for now.
Meanwhile, I don't think Luke is posting from a town mindset, he's overly focused on playing defense, and I don't think 610 is a read town makes, like, ever.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I would be...disappointed if his response to getting caught early was to bounce. But I will not read into that at all, have recent firsthand experience with people mis-clearing scum for a replace out. Treating that action as null. I feel like he's mostly working himself into knots trying to justify those reads and I don't find a believable thought process there.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I think the reference to divide and conquer is instructive, as Lukewarm in that game (as one of the Todoroki) actually engaged and argued with the suspicion on them. Here, I got essentially crickets until he dropped those reads. I don't believe he comes to that conclusion on my alignment that quickly with no effort whatsoever to understand my reasoning. I just don't think it's a town response to pressure.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
How are you defining "focus" here?In post 684, Dwlee99 wrote:
Also CSFIn post 667, Dwlee99 wrote:Frogster
Andante
Luke
Pooky
Andres
Are who I want to focus on this phase I think
Complete list:
Frogster
Andante
Luke
Pooky
Andres
Catboi
CSF- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
E-3, for the record. Do not want any quickhammers.
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
My preference is mainly for people we don't want to see potentially exploded on night 1. Giving null reads control over whether someone lives or dies seems un-ideal. The only point of concern would be someone like frogster who expressed a desire to reflexively kill any defuser. (I do think frogster is likely town at this point, contrary to my first impulse, but don't feel like going into detail right now).In post 701, Cephrir wrote:In fact null reads who think they can do good work in a hood is exactly who I want to vote in today?- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
I don't understand what this means. Explain?In post 714, StrangeMatter wrote:Got flashbacks to when I read Lukewarm’s reads list to Dwlee saying I would absolutely do x as town, where Dwlee was actually scum lol.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
but the contrast is there's 2 bombs tonight and we don't yet have an idea of the degree of difficulty involvedIn post 719, Cephrir wrote:
my reasoning for this is we have to burn 8 people todayIn post 715, catboi wrote:
My preference is mainly for people we don't want to see potentially exploded on night 1. Giving null reads control over whether someone lives or dies seems un-ideal. The only point of concern would be someone like frogster who expressed a desire to reflexively kill any defuser. (I do think frogster is likely town at this point, contrary to my first impulse, but don't feel like going into detail right now).In post 701, Cephrir wrote:In fact null reads who think they can do good work in a hood is exactly who I want to vote in today?
i'd rather save townreads for later nights that have only 3 experts, so they can be more impactful
UNVOTE:
Treating the notes from fire as null but will give him space to see what happens.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
That's a pretty null post from kobaIn post 751, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:
HEAL: the praetorianIn post 631, The Praetorian wrote:andante town
Lukewarm scum
vp still scum
Frogster town
Cephrir scum
just need one more, maybe bell randed scum again lul- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
They weren't even hiding it, how do you not catch on, lolIn post 773, Dwlee99 wrote:Is praetorian koba...
Does that influence your read of them in any way?
I'm confused at how you settled on those names this earlyDwlee99 wrote:
So limited time to solve implies an optimal way to divvy up your solving to maximize utility in reads idk this got too mathy as I was writing itIn post 686, catboi wrote:
How are you defining "focus" here?In post 684, Dwlee99 wrote:
Also CSFIn post 667, Dwlee99 wrote:Frogster
Andante
Luke
Pooky
Andres
Are who I want to focus on this phase I think
Complete list:
Frogster
Andante
Luke
Pooky
Andres
Catboi
CSF
Anyway, these slots are ones I think have a good chance to contain scum and which have other reasons that solving their alignment will be more helpful.- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
But is it wrong thoIn post 785, Cephrir wrote:
Bad reason to scumread anyone and especially meIn post 783, Morning Tweet wrote:Ceph might be scum because they feel the same as usual and they're usually scum. Someone brought up earlier something in the vein of how they aren't playing differently and i liked that- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
You are correct that it is predetermined and incorrect that it is a scumtell for me because I would have an entirely different strategy as scumIn post 814, The Bulge wrote:
I'm leaning scum cuz it looks like agenda-based play. and I don't mean necessarily in a sense like you've developed a plan pre-game and are trying to ensure town will comply, more just that your stance looks predetermined and doesn't look to be naturally evolving with the thread.In post 234, catboi wrote:
Because the counterarguments aren't particularly compelling to me. They assume different things about who scum will nominate and how well town will be able to sort out its reads. At this point since it's all hypothetical we can go in circles for days.In post 233, The Bulge wrote:
i'm more curious about the fact your stance hasn't seemed to change since 21 despite mech discussions dominating large portions of the game so far.In post 229, catboi wrote:Again, this disagreement feels largely theoretical and based around us having different expectations.
Do you think my stance not changing is meaningful for my alignment in some way?- catboi
-
catboi Jack of All Trades
- catboi
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: March 26, 2013
he was basically a block of ice in PYPIn post 837, GuiltyLion wrote:hi pooky
menalque is the only non-consensus one, I didn't say he in particular was consensus. the other three clearly are
what's town is that I felt he passed a vibe check in the early game and my belief is if he were scum he'd be a lot more tryhard and also a lot more upset - catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi
- catboi