pooky obviously scumIn post 11, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i have a plan where we dont let any1 defuse any bombs because defusing bombs is boring
also I wanna be bomb defuser
pooky obviously scumIn post 11, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i have a plan where we dont let any1 defuse any bombs because defusing bombs is boring
Glad to hear it!
i have my reasons, but i’m sorry if it was annoying today! It’s very nice to see you anywaysIn post 130, Morning Tweet wrote:Why do you ask every game? i'm soury though i guess im not in the moodIn post 123, Menalque wrote:I’m sad u wouldn’t answer me, morning
Likewise!In post 131, GuiltyLion wrote:hey Menalque!! it's good to see you again
how you feeling about this game? seemed like you were burned out on rolling/playing scum last time I saw ya
Okay, I won’t push you for reasons rn but I’ll keep that in mindIn post 154, Titus wrote:I strongly feel Frogsterking is town.
Okay, that’s good to hear!In post 158, Morning Tweet wrote:u weren't annoying Mena i just meant I'm on extra guard it feels like. Ur good
as in nullIn post 166, VP Baltar wrote:what is a very neutral read?In post 164, Menalque wrote:very neutral on morning
we’ve got a few games under our collective beltIn post 191, VP Baltar wrote:Have you played with MT a lot?In post 174, Menalque wrote:as in nullIn post 166, VP Baltar wrote:what is a very neutral read?In post 164, Menalque wrote:very neutral on morning
interacting with her so far hasn’t left me any closer on her alignment
Could you highlight where pls? I’ve looked at the iso and I can maybe get on board but I want a better idea of what you’re seeing firstIn post 592, Bell wrote:It’s pretty much related to how they’re navigating suspicion. What they’re choosing to address, how long they choose to address a topic, etc.
I’m actually down to vote him as is, I just wanted to get your elaboration on the why firstIn post 601, Bell wrote:I have no idea how to highlight vague pattern differentials.In post 595, Menalque wrote:Could you highlight where pls? I’ve looked at the iso and I can maybe get on board but I want a better idea of what you’re seeing firstIn post 592, Bell wrote:It’s pretty much related to how they’re navigating suspicion. What they’re choosing to address, how long they choose to address a topic, etc.
They’ll post more. Maybe those new posts will trip your scumdar.
Maybe skim the scum game they linked that they’re proud of.
And see the differences between town luke and scum luke.
I’m not sure how much you’ve played with them tho, so I’m not sure how familiar you are with town luke.
It’s a social deduction game that involves an uninformed majority putting their wits against an informed minorityIn post 618, Frogsterking wrote:Menalque..I wonder what kind of game you're playing at here..
sure, I can take a lookIn post 1663, Frogsterking wrote:I'd appreciate a second opinion on the 40 posts andres just droppedIn post 1658, Menalque wrote:Anything critical that I’ve missed?
I could vote him but it's not screaming scum at meIn post 1663, Frogsterking wrote:I'd appreciate a second opinion on the 40 posts andres just droppedIn post 1658, Menalque wrote:Anything critical that I’ve missed?
the reason I wanted to hear what bell's "Luke scummy" reasoning involved was to see if it seemed plausible to me or notIn post 716, fireisredsir wrote:the way that it felt like it was gauging what the read was based on before publicly commenting to whether they would jump in on it or not seemed more scummy than solvy to meIn post 712, VP Baltar wrote:This is the only other spot where I was like 'huh?' on your analysis.In post 702, fireisredsir wrote:- 595 hmm bad vibes here from menalque
Why does that post give you bad vibes?
hey, I didn't say it was *you* for onceIn post 1673, Bell wrote:Witnessed and logged in the big book of i told you sos.In post 1671, Menalque wrote:largely for postgame credit i'm gonna call ~1 scum in {frogster, VP, andante, bell} for this thing
this was it if you didn't see itIn post 1670, Menalque wrote:I could vote him but it's not screaming scum at meIn post 1663, Frogsterking wrote:I'd appreciate a second opinion on the 40 posts andres just droppedIn post 1658, Menalque wrote:Anything critical that I’ve missed?
the progression on you around VP was unpersuasive to me and seemed too telegraphed as a shift
plus a bunch of the reads in the catchup wall being without commentary initially made it look like a busy-work sort of approach. especially disliked comments such as: "A bit too tryhardy for Scum."; "Pooky feels like they’re full of shit this game and wouldn’t trust them for anything"; "I genuinely dislike this take from Bell."
all of these things could have been v easily expanded on/dug into more in the catchup but instead he needed to be prodded for the extra info
it's almost as ifIn post 2036, Andresvmb wrote:so if there’s something specific you want to ask while I’m here do it.
In post 2034, Menalque wrote:why was your catchup so barebones in details when you went to the effort of making a big catchup post altogether?
bro, I'm gonna say this once: I'm not the enemy here (unless ur scum lol)In post 2045, Andresvmb wrote:I’m not you. I don’t care what you do as Scum. Have you seen me play Scum? Do I make unconstructed and partial arguments when I’m trying to avoid suspicion as that alignment? Like that’s relevant.In post 2043, Menalque wrote:It's not that I disliked it in and of itself -- it's that it was a very barebones and unconstructed thought which is exactly the sort of shit that I and other scum like to throw out
because it's the illusion of saying something while not actually backing it up with anything that can be (a) checked or (b) argued against really. the more fleshed out version is much more helpful.
my understanding of andante is that she's a tryhard most of the time, so it seemed off that you were suggesting the tryhardy-ness made her town.
also, just ignore frog if he's getting to you
could you try to go into some more depth on your thoughts re: pooky and that post by bell in the same way you just did on andante pls?
And you can say that you think it’s throwing random shit to try and appear to be contributing. But is that really what you believe? Have I not followed up on certain comments with specifically what drove my reaction? Is that not helpful?
I think the number of games where I've found pooky to do anything game advancing that's not just pushing a scumread he's come to as a result of whatever his process is could prob be counted on one hand that's missing all the fingersIn post 2050, Andresvmb wrote:In the early going, did Pooky did anything that you felt was game advancing? Like seriously. The post I highlighted is Pooky giving a complete bullshit reason to vote someone (they “feel like they picked a red PM”), and then proceeding to throw out a few half-assed accusations at players (like Morning Tweet). Did you find any of that Townie?
(1) that wasn't what I meant to insinuate by "getting to you" I just meant "getting on your nerves" as in, finding him annoying for whatever reasonIn post 2058, Andresvmb wrote:1 You’re insinuating Frog is getting under my skin. They aren’t. That’s what I meant. Being annoyed at a player making it harder for Town to win isn’t the same as being annoyed at their silly arguments against me.
And Menalque I don’t know your alignment. You’re in a way feeding the beast by asking questions that you aren’t willing to provide your thinking around, but leaving it open for others to use it to attack me.
For example, 2 by saying that you as Scum might post something unconstructed and not that well thought out, you are saying (without having to say it directly) that I could be doing that as Scum. So instead of actively having to say I think you’re Scum because your post was unconstructed in a way that I think Scum you would do, you open up the possibility that someone could grab your argument and use it as a reason to SR me without taking ownership of what you’re putting forth. But ultimately, the argument you put forth is bogus - 3 it doesn’t matter what you would do as Scum when reading me. It matters whether I would do it as Scum or not. I don’t know whether you are or aren’t the enemy - that’s a bit the point isn’t it?
4 If you’re not reading through most things and just actively choosing to participate in the game whenever you want, I’m not sure I need to be responding by pointing to my previous answers. The onus is on you to get the anew right by actually reading through my posts. I don’t have the time to be spoon feeding you what I’ve said previously, and will not be doing that.
In post 2063, Andresvmb wrote:But weren’t you just saying that you don’t rely on meta?
to elaborate a bit more in response: I'm conflicted on your slot still. I feel better than I did and think I no longer want you dead today. however there are enough things that I consider iffy that I'm not willing to sort you as town yet. I'm often somewhat cagey about sharing my full logic around people and I'm gonna hold back on what I think are the reasons to be good on your slot to avoid you/others noting them and trying to copy themIn post 2068, Andresvmb wrote:Have you sorted me better?
that's not quite what GL said but close enoughIn post 2070, fireisredsir wrote:GL said that you didn't want to try as hard anymore but that he believed that deep in your heart you still would want to tryhard if you rolled maf, and that you were laid-back and not caring.In post 2055, Menalque wrote:and TALKING of that, fire, why did hearing about my backstory/history as a player not affect your read on me after GL + catboi answered?
catboi said that you seemed unbothered and not awkward.
i disagreed bc part of what pinged me was something along the lines of awkwardness, and i definitely didn't feel laid-back vibes. the bit about tryharding, that's fine i guess, but i think i would need to know you personally for me to believe that as a reason to change my read on you. it doesn't really do much for me hearing it second-hand
is it to see me?In post 2075, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:sometimes i wonder why i even log on to this website
In post 2079, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:lol thanks dude I needed thisIn post 2076, Menalque wrote:is it to see me?In post 2075, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:sometimes i wonder why i even log on to this website
mena:In post 2081, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:maybe when you sign up for a game you have a commitment to read the entire fucking game
I could die by then, GreetingIn post 2113, Greeting wrote:Why do you want to be bomb expert now and not Day 2 for instance? The top 8 cannot be nominated bomb expert then.In post 2110, Menalque wrote:seems like it would be fun
*double thumbs up*In post 2138, Frogsterking wrote:You need to be VERY gullible to believe andres fake claim, is all I've got to say
let's just ge the flip firstIn post 2141, catboi wrote:ftr if fire slips scum you should be piledriven for this postIn post 2131, Frogsterking wrote:OMG catboi fire is scum, andres is scum, kill andres D1 because he will be more helpful to scum for solving the mechanics of the nightplay.
If you vote andres D1 I will vote fire D2.