I don't want you in my room
VOTE: Cat Scratch Fever
Also hi everyone.
The rules seem to not have foreseen the situation in which some of the bomb experts just refuse to give out any information, with the intention of refusing to participate in the defusing of a bomb. What if the defuser doesn't provide any solution to defusing the bomb too? I suppose technically they didn't either provide a correct nor an incorrect answer and there is no provision for that situation in the rules either.In post 2, Datisi wrote:3. bomb defusals - defusing the bomb:
once night starts, the bomb defuser will receive their bomb, and each bomb expert will receive a part of that bomb's defusal manual.
the bomb defuser and all bomb experts will be added into a private topic for the night. the defuser's job is to describe the bomb, and the experts' job is to tell the defuser how to defuse the bomb, based on their description and the manual they have received. an example of this can be found below.
besides that, the defuser and the experts are free to discuss the game as they wish.
if all the bomb experts give the correct information about the bomb, the defuser will successfully defuse the bomb, and will survive the night.
if any of the bomb experts give incorrect information, the bomb will explode, and the defuser will die.
In post 40, Titus wrote: Refusal is likely treated as gambling with the defuser just guessing at the last second.
In post 41, catboi wrote:Not providing any information is obviously going to be treated the same as giving incorrect information.
Will the whole of the defusal manual of the bomb be provided to everyone (or at least all the bomb experts) in the case of an unsuccessful defusal and subsequent death of the bomb expert?In post 47, Datisi wrote:In post 46, Titus wrote:@Datisi, does the defuser have to accept the recommendations of the experts?yes. the defusermustaccept the recommendations, andcannotsubmit solutions on their own.
Sorry, I meant bomb defuser, not expert.In post 49, Datisi wrote:In post 48, Greeting wrote:Will the whole of the defusal manual of the bomb be provided to everyone (or at least all the bomb experts) in the case of an unsuccessful defusal and subsequent death of the bomb expert?In post 47, Datisi wrote:In post 46, Titus wrote:@Datisi, does the defuser have to accept the recommendations of the experts?yes. the defusermustaccept the recommendations, andcannotsubmit solutions on their own.no, and a bomb expert does not die from an unsucessful defusal.
I don't think it does.In post 51, The Bulge wrote:letting the bomb explode by default potentially gives scum a nightly kill.
Not only letting a bomb explode doesIn post 2, Datisi wrote:GB Inc. infiltrators do not have a factional nightkill every night. they start off with one nightkill. for every two successful bomb defusals performed by a DATS Inc. employee, they gain one nightkill. for every successful bomb defusal performed by a GB Inc. infiltrator, they gain one nightkill.
The rules say that:In post 90, catboi wrote: This is incorrect on multiple counts (the voting for expert does not only count town votes, that would be straightforwardly gamebreaking for obvious reasons. The number of experts selected on night 1 is 8, not 4)
A for effort though.
HEAL: Greeting
for functional purposes I will equate this to a townread, there may be more practical considerations on who to nominate for an expert but those can come later.
This doesn't contradict what I quoted.In post 96, catboi wrote:I would encourage you to read slightly more critically:In post 94, Greeting wrote:The rules say that:In post 90, catboi wrote: This is incorrect on multiple counts (the voting for expert does not only count town votes, that would be straightforwardly gamebreaking for obvious reasons. The number of experts selected on night 1 is 8, not 4)
A for effort though.
HEAL: Greeting
for functional purposes I will equate this to a townread, there may be more practical considerations on who to nominate for an expert but those can come later.
You're being unnecessarily rude and snooty for no valid reason. Sorry for... reading the rules of the game?In post 101, catboi wrote:It is incredibly dumb to think a mechanic would be designed in which the votes of scum do not count, you will be proven wrong whenever this is clarified. I will not engage in further discussion on this subject.
Okay, thanks. I didn't know that "town" is not referring to an alignment in this game, but to the whole of players. In that case, the previous posts by me should be discarded.In post 106, Datisi wrote:In post 105, Greeting wrote:@Datisi, sorry to bother you yet again, but the rules state that town chooses the bomb experts. Is this a mistake? If not, then what happens when a scum nominates someone?
And one last question, what happens if there is a tie amongst players nominated to be bomb experts and there is more ties than spots? For instance, 5 players are tied and 4 experts are chosen.it is not a mistake. the word "town" in that sentence refers to the collective of players, and every single player's nomination vote will be counted, regardless of their alignment.
if there are ties amongst the players nominated, they are broken by seniority; i.e. the players that got to that number of nominations first will be the experts. if, for any reason, that method of tie-breaking is not applicable, the mafia will be able to privately choose the bomb experts.
I wish I was scum this game just to show that I'm perfectly capable of commenting on the setup as scum for the show too, not just because I want to understand it and use this knowledge to town's benefit. Honestly, I could also make the same post if I were scum, I would just leave out the part about potential wagon ties (which was a major unknown even if I was correct about only town votes counting) and hope that no one delves too much into that. They probably wouldn't even notice. This game has already 28 pages.In post 680, Titus wrote: I wish I was scum this game just to show you everyone is pocketable. I don't know who you are, but that's a very proud statement.
Ugh, I confused the bomb defuser with bomb expert again. I meant the bomb expert. Sorry.In post 689, Titus wrote:Worth asking the mod, but I don't think this is possible given the defuser must accept the expert opinions.In post 688, Greeting wrote:I mean, what if a town bomb defuser fails to understand the instructions correctly and gives out the wrong answer even if they did not intend to do so?
Hi!In post 692, fireisredsir wrote:hello friends!! ive never been a replacement before this is fun
I know that this has been said before, but the town alternative wincon is extremely hard to achieve. The scum alternative wincon, on the other hand, is something that totally can happen, without us even knowing.In post 2, Datisi wrote:DATS Inc. employees win when all GB Inc. infiltrators are dead and at least one DATS Inc. employee is alive, OR when DATS Inc. employees act as successful bomb defusers 8 times.
GB Inc. infiltrators win when all DATS Inc. employees are dead and at least one GB Inc. infiltrator is alive, OR when GB Inc. infiltrators act as successful bomb defusers 4 times.
I haven't nominated anyone yet. I'm not sheeping everyone else, because I'm cooler than that. Just like I townreadIn post 738, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I thought that's what we've all been doing this entire timeIn post 735, Greeting wrote:I am on board with nominating the towniest players to be bomb experts
This is such a misrepresentation of what I said and meant.In post 792, Andante wrote:excuse me? you hate my playstyle so what point are you trying to make? You calling me scum?
Why would you care at all if me/In post 833, GuiltyLion wrote:haven't read up yet, about to do so now, but looked at the latest VC and it seems like a lot of my initial desired experts are fairly consensus so
HEAL: Andante
HEAL: Frogsterking
HEAL: Greeting
HEAL: Menalque
will retract if I notice any issues during the catch up
I don't hate your playstyle, I never said I did, plus I didn't call you scum.In post 1021, Andante wrote:how is me asking you a question a misrepresentation??In post 1019, Greeting wrote:This is such a misrepresentation of what I said and meant.In post 792, Andante wrote:excuse me? you hate my playstyle so what point are you trying to make? You calling me scum?
I am aiming to support the towniest people I can find in this game to be bomb experts. I don't know how to read you well, so I'd rather you weren't a bomb expert. I also don't get why people townread you at all.
That's all, folks!
I have the most posts here I think, if you don't tr me, then you sr me, so why? what's the reason?
Consensus reads mentioned again.In post 849, GuiltyLion wrote:I'm just powerskimming to get caught up first but so far I'm vibing with most of the seemingly consensus reads so far this game
Luke scumreads make sense to me and I'm down to sheep the case laid out by catboi and others
like that Menalque has the same attitude on page 25
as of page 25 I'm down to vote any of Dwlee/Luke/Baltar
StrangeMatter Frog vote is odd, I have a hard time understanding how Frog can be anyone's choice of "this is the best use of my vote and the slot most likely to flip scum"
Hello,
I'm aware that all games I've played withIn post 1038, fireisredsir wrote:ive read some games with him in it and do not think this is alignment indicative lol, if anything i think he is that way as town more oftenIn post 1032, Greeting wrote:Unfortunately, I feel like this could potentially be alignment indicative. I've played with catboi a few times before and he was never like this.
It absolutely does. And it doesn't just apply to one's behavior, people tend to associate the avatar with the person typing behind the screen. I had to put in pronouns as everyone assumed that I'm female just because I have a bad picture of Godney Spears as my avi.In post 1037, VP Baltar wrote: I know it sounds crazy! But I feel like avis can have an unconscious bias influence on how snippy people think you're being. People legit call me scummy all the time in games as town, and I think part of it is my avatar.
Hence why I think it's best just to leave him in the null and look for townies somewhere else.In post 1037, VP Baltar wrote:All that being said, catboi did seem slightly aggressive in a few interactions, where it seemed a bit much. Could also just be having RL annoyances I guess, so overall, not sure I agree with him not being an expert. He does have a good grasp of the setup, and I think that's something we want to leverage if he's town.
Yeah, and my thought was "oh, this looks cool, let's try it out and see what goes" and not "let's break it down to pieces to figure out the optimal play for each alignment before the game starts". I also think that the majority of players think the same way I do. You might be one who went for the latter though.In post 1061, catboi wrote:You do realize the setup mechanics were made public in signups, right?In post 1032, Greeting wrote:There's also a second reason: he seems to be very knowledgeable about this setup, which could either mean that he's individually very experienced in mafia games and games in general (likely), but this knowledge could have also been a result of him having a private space to analyse the setup with someone equally experienced (also likely).
Revisiting this post + the postsIn post 742, Cephrir wrote:If we put in the 8 towniest players today we will have slim pickings day 2 and 3
That's why I'm proposing we not fully do that
While thinking about game strategy I encountered the same issue, like: what happens Night 2? AndIn post 2, Datisi wrote:during the first 4 days, once someone has acted as a bomb expert, they are unable to be a bomb expert the next two nights, meaning they cannot be nominated. from day 5 and onwards, once someone has acted as a bomb expert, they cannot be a bomb expert the next night. this restriction is lifted once there are 5 or fewer players alive.
I don't think
I mean, even if we consider the fact that 225 was beforeIn post 1112, VP Baltar wrote: Eh, not really. I was alluding to preserving townreads in 225, though tbf, it was still a half baked idea there and more me thinking about how hard it will be to get 8 townreads today that people agree on.
In post 1114, Cephrir wrote: what is the point of this post. you want to torpedo this townread but your reason is flimsy at best per your own admission
Yeah, I think I misunderstood.In post 1357, GuiltyLion wrote:This is not how I formed my townreads, you are making an assumption or misunderstanding what I saidIn post 1273, Greeting wrote:Not "x is town because y is town and townreads x". Forming associations like this Day 1 is a bad strategy as they are unsupported by any hard data as to whom is voting out whom and whom is nominating for bomb expert (which is equated to being a townread in this game). We'll get the hard data once Day 1 is over. Right now this is just constantly shifting and it's not uncommon for mafia to be distancing themselves from one another.
I expressed my townreads (without any reasoning) in 258, it was after I was away from the thread and came back in 833 that I healed them, but me healing them in 833 because they were consensus does not mean that I townread them because they are consensus
I thought it's glaringly obvious that DATS inc. and GB inc. is a reference to the mod himself and GeorgeBailey, who is a backup mod.In post 66, Frogsterking wrote:I'm also curious if this is a part of a twist associated with the story.In post 54, Frogsterking wrote:Hey guys, I thought I was clever, but it looks like several other people realized defusing bombs is good for maf.
I came up with a name for the strat:MAD
MurderAllDefusers
We don't know that DATS inc. is even a bomb defusing company at all. All we know is that DATS inc. has been infiltrated. It's possible defusing bombs isn't DATS inc. primary purpose, and the story revolves around a company whose primary purpose has been lost.
For example, maybe DATS inc. actually stands for:
Destroy All Traitors and Scum incorporated
or
Destroy All Traitorous Scum incorporated
PEDit: StrangeMatters is already out of their scum range by the way, slight townread on StrangeMatters from me.
Why do you want to be bomb expert now and not Day 2 for instance? The top 8 cannot be nominated bomb expert then.In post 2110, Menalque wrote:seems like it would be fun
Okay.In post 2116, Menalque wrote:I could die by then, GreetingIn post 2113, Greeting wrote:Why do you want to be bomb expert now and not Day 2 for instance? The top 8 cannot be nominated bomb expert then.In post 2110, Menalque wrote:seems like it would be fun
Fine.In post 2130, catboi wrote:I hate doing these quote walls because I feel like people don't engage with them, but I am less than thrilled with the directions people have been spinning off in and am not content to play passively.
fire's scum, just zip it up and send them already before everyone decides they're sick of this game
In post 2149, Andante wrote:sure thing!In post 2145, fireisredsir wrote:can someone unvote
VOTE: Fire
Period.In post 2191, Andante wrote:FROGSTER IS MAFIA. IGNORE ANYTHING HE SAYS HERE. He Refused to even attempt to solve the bomb last night and was messing around. catboi did claim the IC thing last night, and frogster instead refused to solve, and basically claimed maf in that hood
I was wondering that too, and that is why initially I was careful about scumreading him.In post 2214, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:but if he were scum, why wouldn't he just pretend to give the correct solution to the bomb and sabotage silently?In post 2208, Greeting wrote:catboiouted his role in our PT andFrogsterkingoutright refused to solve and did everything in his power to sabotage the process, disregarding any relevant points raised and attempting to derail the PT in any possible way he could.
catboi's role claim was anextremelyimprobable one to make for scum, because it can be verified almost immediately. If we bomb solved, he would have been confirmed. If the bomb exploded, his role would be revealed in the flip. It makes zero sense as town to not believe it.
Frogsterkingrefused to even provide any answer to the puzzle.
In these circumstances this is basically outing himself as scum.
why isn't he just a VI
Yes, he was literally grilling me for disbelieving at first.In post 2260, VP Baltar wrote:did catboi call frog scum too?In post 2252, Greeting wrote:I strongly encourage you to ignore whateverFrogis saying and follow me,Andante,Andresvmbandcatboionto this.
Paraphrasing.In post 2271, VP Baltar wrote:thx. Why was he townreading andres?In post 2267, Greeting wrote:Yes, he was literally grilling me for disbelieving at first.In post 2260, VP Baltar wrote:did catboi call frog scum too?In post 2252, Greeting wrote:I strongly encourage you to ignore whateverFrogis saying and follow me,Andante,Andresvmbandcatboionto this.
Andantecan confirm this.
100% agreed.In post 2327, Andante wrote:Like, in the event frogs flips town... EVERYTHING about his play in the hood was anti town, like Greeting had the exact same doubts I did... "why would scum just not solve?" but by frogster doing what he did.. catboi and I were basing all of our reads around frogster!scum world cause, it just doesn't make sense for town to be like frogster was... like, why not go "oh yeah I'm town, now I'll help solve" no.. frogster did 0 solving and was constantly like "lol no rush! still have 2 days to solve the bomb" "lol no rush still have hours!!"In post 2322, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I think if you're town, frogs, it's more likely that your hood was all town
I'm not going to elaborate on this further at this time
it's just like, we HAVE to lim frogster... there is no way anyone lives after that performance
In post 2376, Cephrir wrote:A circus is a company of performers who put on diverse entertainment shows that may include clowns, acrobats, trained animals, trapeze acts, musicians, dancers, hoopers, tightrope walkers, jugglers, magicians, ventriloquists, and unicyclists as well as other object manipulation and stunt-oriented artists. The term circus also describes the performance which has followed various formats through its 250-year modern history. Although not the inventor of the medium, Philip Astley is credited as the father of the modern circus. In 1768, Astley, a skilled equestrian, began performing exhibitions of trick horse riding in an open field called Ha'Penny Hatch on the south side of the Thames River.[1] In 1770, he hired acrobats, tightrope walkers, jugglers and a clown to fill in the pauses between the equestrian demonstrations and thus chanced on the format which was later named a "circus". Performances developed significantly over the next fifty years, with large-scale theatrical battle reenactments becoming a significant feature. The traditional format, in which a ringmaster introduces a variety of choreographed acts set to music, developed in the latter part of the 19th century and remained the dominant format until the 1970s.
If we assume that everyone is playing towards their wincon, there is no town explanation forIn post 2446, VP Baltar wrote:I guess the frog scum play here was to get catboi, a good player, into a vulnerable position and just kamikaze him? It's kind of silly, especially since frog was pretty widely town read yesterday. So, GL is probably right. maybe they thought andres wasn't going to cooperate with bomb solving or something, and then when everyone started to solve right away, frog just tried to do the dirty work. Doesn't explain why he wouldn't just give wrong directions though and not draw so much heat immediately.