Or maybe later depending on how much time i have to kill
Also this pl is fire
Also
VOTE: dats
I want to give townpoints to this except i think scum-prism probably claims it too?
Idk if scum claims it right out the gate, i think town nearly always does (or at least town who's moderately experienced, whatever)In post 10, Prism wrote:Shockingly that is actually +town for Enchant because he's not reading the fake PM as scum lmao
I'm gonna be more vla thab usual this weekend >.>In post 35, VP Baltar wrote:we should probably lim skitter before the weekend so she doesn't have to worry the game is getting away from her while she is away.
Oh whoops fhis wasnt meant to be quoted, this was meant to be a response to enchantIn post 36, skitter30 wrote:Idk if scum claims it right out the gate, i think town nearly always does (or at least town who's moderately experienced, whatever)In post 10, Prism wrote:Shockingly that is actually +town for Enchant because he's not reading the fake PM as scum lmao
You had some posts that pinged me as scummy for vague, inarticutable reasonsIn post 109, Dwlee99 wrote:What is scumping?In post 106, skitter30 wrote:Also dwlee's reaction to my scumping makes me more sus of them
You realize i can *very* easily bounce this read back at you, right?In post 114, VP Baltar wrote:You're having too many SERIOUS reads based on meh things.In post 89, skitter30 wrote:Vpb why are u wagoning me?
Its a false positive for traffic analyst, but not for pt copIn post 117, Enchant wrote:Traffic Analyst checks for "Outside communication".In post 106, skitter30 wrote:I'm p sure mailman doesnt get caught by pt cop
But i think town ascetic could very plausibly be a thing
Also dwlee's reaction to my scumping makes me more sus of them
Mailman is false positive for him. Yeah i misstold about PT Cop tho.
These pinged me ^In post 54, Dwlee99 wrote:Initial townreads on prism (I will regret this), cephrir
That would also be a fun team!In post 152, Aristeia wrote:right now I think the scum team is exactly skitter/prism
I didn't like how she played around me revealing.
I think everyone else feels genuinely curious
I didnt say active lurking, i said 'wasnt solving' at that point. I disnt go back and check but i dont think any of ceph/prism/vpb maybe enchant had reads at that point ...In post 161, Dwlee99 wrote:Who else was active lurking give namesIn post 151, skitter30 wrote:Ok does that not apply to the like 5 other people in the game who did not have reads yet?
Also i think ceph can fake not hating the game for a whole 50 posts
Also i think vpb is somewhat scummy as well
Is the 'she' here me or prism?In post 152, Aristeia wrote:right now I think the scum team is exactly skitter/prism
I didn't like how she played around me revealing.
I think everyone else feels genuinely curious
Meh fair enufIn post 175, Dwlee99 wrote:They're giving thoughts on the game. Enchant less so but enchant is enchant
She thinks town-you wouldnt be pushing a team of her/someone else based on recent prior experiencesIn post 215, Aristeia wrote:skitter what is prism pushing me for rn
You wanna vote vpb with me?In post 216, Shuichi Saihara wrote:What is with the bravado?
And that ur read on her / push is fakeIn post 218, skitter30 wrote:She thinks town-you wouldnt be pushing a team of her/someone else based on recent prior experiencesIn post 215, Aristeia wrote:skitter what is prism pushing me for rn
What? You're the one who said i was lyingIn post 234, VP Baltar wrote:Idk. You wrote my posts are sussIn post 231, skitter30 wrote:? What am i lying abt?not gonna lie
Weird phrasing.
... 'ngl' is a very common phrase ...In post 245, VP Baltar wrote:That is not what i meant. I said it was weird of you to say "ngl" there when you could just say "vp these posts are suss".In post 236, skitter30 wrote:What? You're the one who said i was lying
There is a forced casualness to appending "ngl" on the phrase. So I asked why you would need to "lie" about calling my posts suss.
Fwiw i'm not sure she's actually pushing me, or even a team of me/you ...In post 251, Prism wrote:Acting like you're not pushing me/Skitter in 155 is again disingenuous.
You're behaving differently than how town-prism thinks you would behave here - namely, she doesn't think you would start a push on a teamread involving here again after the events of that gameIn post 248, Prism wrote:My argument is that you previously went on a snipehunt chasing my partner before me in the Mini Normal. I don't think you even start on that path again and just focus squarely on me.
Your response to this was that you understood the connection. However you didn't spend that much time on it, and you weren't actually voting skitter. In comparison, you actually wound up forcing my "partner" through first in the other game as you were already there. This distinction is a mitigating response with further depth of context, not a complete rejection.
Perhaps you are in fact town and this distinction critical. Acting like there's obviously no real connection and it's irrational from my end to expect this makes me suspect it is in bad faith.
? Not sure i understand what you're sayingIn post 281, Prism wrote:At the end of the day she's seen me get into these 1v1s repeatedly and knows that my hitrate is quite high, even if they can be very annoying.
You're asking the wrong questions, commenting on things that are kinda irrelevant, and your read on me is bad and way too strong for the reasoning you're giving, and you're reacting kinda off to me/people pointing that outIn post 304, VP Baltar wrote:Stilted?In post 303, skitter30 wrote:Oh dear, i'm doing this all wrong apparently >.<
Anyways can we talk about how scummy vpb is being and how stilted he sounds ^
- fire/ceph have both said similar things as me, i dont believe you've responded to anything either has saidIn post 309, VP Baltar wrote:9p packed with good town.In post 308, skitter30 wrote:Pedit what do u mean by 'setup' in this context?
Who are the people "pointing it out" besides you?
Also, my questions are on fucking point. As opposed to you, who provided zero commentary on the main event of the game so far (ari/prism)Prism, and just omgused me on basically the same thing I called you out about.
(Sorry bout your flight though, that sucks)
I would actually argue that you've made less meaningul commentary than me on the main event of the game, so kinda galling that you come scumreading me for things that you're doing to a bigger extreme yourselfIn post 181, VP Baltar wrote:I am team Ari in this dispute.
Usually in the beginning of games i try to say whatever comes to mind, however slight - doing so tends to generate content, which is nice early onIn post 339, Datisi wrote:assuming the words "dats" and "like" are supposed to be switched around, (1) why do you choose this to say now? (2) why?
The rvs vote wasnt serious or based on anything (i hadnt read anything at that point), was just an initial vote that i placed somewhereIn post 341, Datisi wrote:the "why do you say this now" means "why do you choose to say you dislike my post not right when voting me, but after you have made like 20 filler post in between"
i said dwlee's posts pinged. They called that a bad and wrong read. Are you saying i'm not meant to ask why they think it was a bad read? Unless you think dwlee was obvtown at that point, i dont understand why said read would be classified as 'bad', so i was asking what made iftbadIn post 341, Datisi wrote:re second question: were you expecting anything other than "i'm town"??? like, you said you had "scumpings", you did not explain them at all, the person you're scumpinging told you you're wrong, and *you* are the one asking *them* why you are wrong... like that's not how that's supposed to work i think? you don't get to give zero explanation then ask someone why your thoughts are wrong.
My vpb read was discussed multiple times in the pages you chose not to read, but okIn post 343, Datisi wrote:i have read the first 10 pages and my brain has started melting afterwards, so i will either return to this later or just pretend i read them
i wanna VOTE: skitter30
and if skitter30 flips red, we are nuking vp baltar literally zero fucking questions asked, their fight *really* felt like crap theatre
No, i'm actually pushing him ...In post 353, Datisi wrote:skitt's fight with baltar *really* reminds me of the fight she and i had very early on in the recently finished large normal where she wanted to pick a fight with me early but it's wasn't going exactly right so she kept being like "but guys look how scummy is datisi being look!!!" and like
Was a ping. Dont know why i thought it was bad. If i have to rry to put it to words: prism's thought r.e. enchant was reasonable, and that post feels under-mining-yIn post 357, Datisi wrote:is there any reason why you are still avoiding saying why you thought that post was bad?
No, i dont. I dont know why that read would be objecticely/immediately 'bad' and 'wrong' given what they had posted at thay point thus far , and i was asking what made it badIn post 357, Datisi wrote:yes. your read on them offered literally no substance. then you asked them what was wrong with it.do you not see the issue here???like, if you had said "dwlee, i scumread you because of xyz, why do you think that is bad?" then sure, whatever. but you just said "i scumread you", and then you're asking "why shouldn't i" without saying why you scumread them makes it seem like a completely empty question, because again, what are you expecting there? what are they supposed to answer to?
Then i suggest that you endeavor to form a read on him, his iso is p empty and easy to read ... ^In post 360, Datisi wrote:besides +partner with you, i am notIn post 356, skitter30 wrote:How are you reading him?