[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 13406108 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 1056: Moderators of the Discord Server [game over] - Mafiascum.net
I replaced into a previous run which Prism modded.
I was scum with Luke and imaginality.
I'll just link it here for reference.
Also, implo said from that game that Wall is the easiest game for scum.
I have a good plan for Sillyposting if Luke remains there after the Night swap.
Let him vote first.
I remember that he did that last time as scum and Town won the minigame.
As for what minigame I would like to choose, I would prefer Sillyposting so that I can use my plan but the others are fine for me.
In post 173, Faker wrote:Now that Sillyposting is gone, do you have a preference between the other two?
I'd also caution people that anyone going into SGB automatically ends the day.
I'm not sure who you are asking but Mafia Discussion seems like a better choice because the conftown usually decides last while the other two players crossvote.
In post 173, Faker wrote:Now that Sillyposting is gone, do you have a preference between the other two?
I'd also caution people that anyone going into SGB automatically ends the day.
I'm not sure who you are asking but Mafia Discussion seems like a better choice because the conftown usually decides last while the other two players crossvote.
It was to you, I will try to make my posts more clear when in sequence like that.
Can you go further with why that functionality makes MD a better fit for you or more preferable to SGB? You can be a crossvoter or the clear, so it's not obvious which one you'd like to be or if it's something about the overall dynamic.
It's to do with the dynamic.
I like the idea of knowing other people's alignments in your minigame. It makes solving easier because then you get a good idea of what to do.
And to be honest, it's mostly the idea of crossvoting and pressuring the clear to make the right decision that gives Gate (Mafia Discussion) its appeal.
In post 184, Meuh wrote:
Although with the swip swapping around I'm not sure how best to approach forming a group?
Actually would it not be good to have a 3 townie channel? To restrict what the mafia can do with the swap at the very least.
I guess that D1 groups are good for getting people's intentions.
Regarding your second suggestion, it would be great theoretically though I'm unsure on how things will unfold.
This might sound bizarre but I think that the interactions between Dwlee and marci seem like they are aligned, possibly even scum together.
What does everybody else think?
In post 237, RH9 wrote:This might sound bizarre but I think that the interactions between Dwlee and marci seem like they are aligned, possibly even scum together.
What does everybody else think?
i wanna know what made you think this.
im pretty sure at this point their push on me is partly in fact that theyre scum and partly fact they seem to hate me
I would admit that their interaction's with you reminded me of how me and Luke interacted when we were scum together during Prism's run.
Also, how you signed up to Stop Getting Banned in your first post as a test. It feels almost like you had a plan.
But then, maybe I'm just being nitpicky and a bit unfair.
In post 252, Meuh wrote:Fun fact: Dragons/Faker/me are confirmed not to be the scumteam because if we were, we would win from the day end rule
Kinda surprised no one (especially RH9) thought of this? (Faker touched on the rule earlier but not this specific scenario iirc)
Like RH9 going into MD could’ve just let scum insta-win but luckily that’s not happening
Also because of this, the next channel choice should be the one for whoever goes into SGB, to make sure we can’t instalose
Oh.
Thanks for telling me.
I didn't realise that before.
In post 437, Faker wrote:Hitting right notes, happy with Occam's Razor.
Not going to rush it still but with that post, I strongly think Luke->marci wins the game outright. Even with SGB slanted in scum's favor it is never worth it for me as a player to trade 1 for 1, Luke flipping town should essentially clear me despite his statement.
What makes you say this?
I know the whole Luke-marci thing but what makes you think that SGB is slanted? You don't think that I am Town, do you?
Because it's obviously slanted against scum otherwise. I have made clear my read on Dwlee meaning that scum!them would probably try to get STD to agree to voting me. Meanwhile, there's STD who's unsuspected and who I doubt is scum.
By the way, the swap reinforced my reads.
I think that Dwlee was distancing from marci during D1 so that when they were apart and marci flipped red, scum could use this flip to make STD misvote.
In post 440, Faker wrote:I am speaking strictly mechanically when I say SGB is slanted towards scum. It is a basic 3 way no clear, and it is more likely for scum to win than the town.
In post 439, RH9 wrote:By the way, the swap reinforced my reads.
I think that Dwlee was distancing from marci during D1 so that when they were apart and marci flipped red, scum could use this flip to make STD misvote.
ur being a bit dumb rn
why would mexdwlee team bet our cards on dragons when at the start of it all, we didnt know who our third would be?
i thought dwlee was town and RH9 more likely to be a hacker
but after pooky was revealed
i thought the opposite because pooky's interaction with dwlee appears S/T and pooky's interaction with RH9 is non-existent (which makes sense for it to be S/S)
If I'm not misinterpreting, you thought that Dwlee was Town and now you think that Pooky/Dwlee is S/S.
That doesn't sound like you thought the opposite.
I don't.
I think that they feel pretty non-committal. Other than voicing a suspicion on marci and stating their intention to reaccess Pooky, they have zero reads on us.
They don't even mention me which according to you, Pooky did, and you used to justify your SR on me.
My point is that not mentioning somebody is NAI.
For example, Penguin who has flipped Town, never mentioned me.
If Pooky mentioning marci, Dwlee and you make you and Dwlee Town, then what does a flipped Town not mentioning me, you and Dwlee mean?
Plus, who do you think I'm even scum with?
In post 648, RH9 wrote:Honestly, I agree with Dwlee that we should resolve MD next.
It feels somewhat safer because I trust Meuh more to make a good decision.
Tracking through your posts, you think marcistar is the scum in this minigame. 277 seems to be your best statement of it: It's all related to earlygame with Dwlee99 and her initial votelock on SGB.
Has your read on this game evolved as we've continued to play? You also haven't ventured a read on me at all, which I find pretty surprising.
Yeah. My read has evolved. I've been starting to reconsider my read on Dwlee. In a vacuum, they actually seem all right though a bit non-committal as seen in 253.
However, this conflicts with my read on STD, who reads as wrongly tunnelled Town as in his latest stream of posts.
Especially, the amount of insight that he has put in. If I had to bet for scum out of my minigame, I would be forced to say Dwlee despite improvements in my read of them.
In post 284, Faker wrote:Man, I really hope I don't get nightkilled this game.
The quoted made me feel like it was dumbtell because I would expect you to know that GotF had no NK.
Your jovial tone during D1 also brought up alarm bells because you almost never act tongue-in-cheek in every game that I've played with you and during those games, you were Town.
However, from D2 onwards, your tone started to improve and partially due to my SR on marci, you're now a TR.
In post 670, Faker wrote:RH9, what do you make of Dwlee99 instantly joining marcistar in SGB?
This could be coordinated, but it heavily restricts any swaps. Autoloss is not hard to dodge in a scenario, but scum are now forced to take one of those two players and put them in whichever game winds up with 2 town.
This double-lock again happened before they have any idea of what the town players were thinking or what their reads were.
I think that since Pooky flipped, it's likely that scum!Pooky with his expertise and experience, made a plan and convinced marci and Dwlee to follow along.
It's likely that Dwlee had intentionally joined marci so that Town, not expecting two scum to engage in such a risky behaviour, would view this as unaligned. I also think that Pooky engineered his interactions with both so that when Sillyposting flipped (as is the norm), whoever the Town are in SGB would be convinced that Dwlee was Town.
I think that swapping marci was always the plan but when it came out that they needed to swap marci into MD, the scum decided to leave you with her, because I had already suggested my belief that marci and Dwlee was aligned and "possibly even scum together".
In post 686, Faker wrote:284 was a complete joke where the punchline was that I couldn't get nightkilled. I expected no one to think I forgot one existed. It was also partially a reference to this account's last game, Coalition, where I replaced in for night phase but was instantly nightkilled and never got to play.
The Newbie we played I wasn't very joking, but I'm a born shitposter at heart. I have a duality of being probably one of the most intense players to ever touch the site, but outside of the game I'm a much more jester-like personality and take virtually nothing seriously. Some games are heavier on one side than others, for this one I have tried extremely hard to keep a balance of intense but not venomously so. This is a long-term project of mine and I'm happy with this game so far. The short episode with Penguin was acrimonious but both an exception, and progress compared to how vicious I can often be with my critique.
Anyway, if my jovial tone becomes a concern at any point, you can see the competing venomous/shitposting switches on display in plenty of town games of mine. Chara's Folly, Mini Normal 2181, and Slaughter Hour (all on Prism) just to name a few. This account's 9:12 also was very lighthearted until a very serious accusation got thrown out.
Meuh, who do you want eliminated the most from SGB?
Same goes for Faker and marci.
I want to see your reads because it could potentially impact my decision if we are to resolve SGB after MD.
In post 685, RH9 wrote:I think that since Pooky flipped, it's likely that scum!Pooky with his expertise and experience, made a plan and convinced marci and Dwlee to follow along.
Mmmmm knowing Pooky I strongly disagree with this. Even in his best scum games he's not really dictatorial and is more focused on having fun with his partners and kind of trolling around hoping for the best. You can see this free-wheeling style on display in thesetwo scum PTs, which weren't cherrypicked but were just the first games I thought of where he rolled scum. If he sees a great strategic plan he will advance it, but telling his partners exactly where to go and what to do pregame isn't his style.
If it happened at all, it was probably a joking suggestion by one of the parties where they all just say YOLO and go for it. They then debate the merits of the swaps overnight.
In post 685, RH9 wrote:It's likely that Dwlee had intentionally joined marci so that Town, not expecting two scum to engage in such a risky behaviour, would view this as unaligned.
I think it's certainly plausible to do so, but why do you think it's likely?
I think so because that's exactly the sort of thing scum!me would do. Flip most people's expectations.
There's nothing better than making people think that it's impossible because people are easily tricked into believing anything that fits their narrative.
In post 685, RH9 wrote:I also think that Pooky engineered his interactions with both so that when Sillyposting flipped (as is the norm), whoever the Town are in SGB would be convinced that Dwlee was Town.
I think Pooky having good interactions with his partners is a given. I could nitpick but I don't think it'd be productive; I just think this is a hasty conclusion to assume he planned this far in advance before the swaps were even decided. He didn't interact with Dwlee99, or any SGB poster, much on Day 2.
In post 685, RH9 wrote:I think that swapping marci was always the plan but when it came out that they needed to swap marci into MD, the scum decided to leave you with her, because I had already suggested my belief that marci and Dwlee was aligned and "possibly even scum together".
Swap speculations are difficult because we're kind of working backwards here: You came up with a world where Dwlee99/marci decide to swap you and marcistar. This is really hard to put stock in here, though, because of what I talked about earlier with Dragons: Dragons really did not enjoy a previous 3 way with me, and there's a good chance he never wants to touch any minigame with me.
If both teams would make this specific swap, it's hard to say that knowing why they would inherently makes this one team more likely than the other. Swapping me/Dragons doesn't seem terrible, admittedly, and that would have been an option for Dragons/marcistar.
That's true.
Thanks for the food for thought.
I'll consider these swap scenarios.
In post 485, RH9 wrote:By the way, what does everybody think of a Pooky-marci-Dwlee team?
I'm leaning there right now.
Why was Pooky in here?
From my PoE.
I TRed Luke and Penguin, leaving behind him.
To be honest, I actually had Penguin in the PoE originally.
However, I would admit that one reason I moved him to a TR was mainly because I trusted Luke's read on Pooky.
As for my TR on Luke, it was that switch from jovial to serious. I know Luke's scumgame and he's not the sort to suddenly change from jovial to serious in one phase.
In post 719, marcistar wrote:
this game is so boring with faker being so obviously scum
i honestly dont get what rh9 is going on about rn, whats the use on commenting on dead ppl when u can instead use that energy and focus it into reading the people in ur minigame?
Firstly, Faker isn't exactly obvscum because the rest of us lack the extra insight that you have. We only know that between you and her, there's one moderator and one hacker.
Secondly, my comments were in response to Faker's posts. Not only that, these rereads are good help for my reads on my minigame. It helps me develop my reads.
In post 720, RH9 wrote:Firstly, Faker isn't exactly obvscum because the rest of us lack the extra insight that you have. We only know that between you and her, there's one moderator and one hacker.
fakers obv scum to me, and thats what makes it boring, when i already know part of the answer >.<
isnt she obviously buddying u? i feel like its v obv to me that thats what shes been doing.
Again, it isn't obvious that she's buddying me.
I have no idea of scum!Faker so there's no way for me to tell her intentions.
In post 720, RH9 wrote:Secondly, my comments were in response to Faker's posts. Not only that, these rereads are good help for my reads on my minigame. It helps me develop my reads.
i dont see you trying to tie it back to any surviving players.
Well.
To be honest with you, I haven't.
However, I hope to achieve this soon.
In post 730, Faker wrote:
The current plan is also to flip MD first, so even if I'm trying to steer RH9 away from scumreading my partner in SGB, it all goes out the window when my alignment gets confirmed before any SGB votes happen. There's literally zero point in buddying anyone in that minigame, the only person I have to convince is Meuh.
That's so true.
Any attempt you and marci try to make to sway anybody in SGB, the more interactions we have to use after you flip.
This makes any swaying attempts awkward especially since it could backfire.
In post 741, marcistar wrote:really? its obvious to me that shes trying to buddy you,
ever since sillyposting ended, shes been focusing mainly on interacting with you, and making sure you feel like your thoughts are heard, while shooting down anything that might be a valid thoughtprocess. thats pretty buddying behavior IMO. I can get examples if you still dont believe me but theres alot of them :shrug:
Good idea, actually.
Could you please find. examples of Faker buddying?
I probably missed them all.
In post 648, RH9 wrote:Honestly, I agree with Dwlee that we should resolve MD next.
It feels somewhat safer because I trust Meuh more to make a good decision.
Tracking through your posts, you think marcistar is the scum in this minigame. 277 seems to be your best statement of it: It's all related to earlygame with Dwlee99 and her initial votelock on SGB.
Has your read on this game evolved as we've continued to play? You also haven't ventured a read on me at all, which I find pretty surprising.
Yeah. My read has evolved. I've been starting to reconsider my read on Dwlee. In a vacuum, they actually seem all right though a bit non-committal as seen in 253.
However, this conflicts with my read on STD, who reads as wrongly tunnelled Town as in his latest stream of posts.
Especially, the amount of insight that he has put in. If I had to bet for scum out of my minigame, I would be forced to say Dwlee despite improvements in my read of them.
What's non-committal about it? Them saying Pooky could also be the cat? That felt more jokey than anything. I'd like an expansion of the thought here.
In post 730, Faker wrote:
The current plan is also to flip MD first, so even if I'm trying to steer RH9 away from scumreading my partner in SGB, it all goes out the window when my alignment gets confirmed before any SGB votes happen. There's literally zero point in buddying anyone in that minigame, the only person I have to convince is Meuh.
That's so true.
Any attempt you and marci try to make to sway anybody in SGB, the more interactions we have to use after you flip.
This makes any swaying attempts awkward especially since it could backfire.
I'd agree with this if we weren't already a game down. Scum are much more likely to delve into potentially associative - but credible - play to secure a win somewhere since that's all they need. There might not be an "after you flip", which is scary but something to consider.
Though I guess with the idea of us flipping MD first that makes sense. So mostly nvm
In post 781, marcistar wrote:i think rh9 has a hard time reassessing his reads after someone pulls something over him.
Only when I actually get super confbiased. I have a huge weakness for casing. I've lost a game as Town when the final Mafia gave a really good case which swayed me over.
In post 745, RH9 wrote:Good idea, actually.
Could you please find. examples of Faker buddying?
I probably missed them all.
670 reads like shes trying to feed you a read a certain way (the explanation after the question makes it that way) 681 same thing, shes trying to pick apart your reads and shoot down any progressive thought process.. but shes trying to do it in a way that won't agitate you. notice in the post how she hasnt said its a bad thought process at all? she just calls it "surprising" which is a sort of buddy buddy way of shooting down a read without making a person angry. 688 not buddying, but its like she isn't stating a suspicion on any of the stop getting banned players in that post; shes replying to you in a non accusatory way, she states somethings "in dwlees favor", she gives a "dragons isnt out of range" but in a half way where she doesnt use it further later on. she isnt hunting.
maybe buddying isnt the right word for these posts, its hard to do this while im tired..
alot of her posts regarding you is just asking questions/pushing your read forward which i view as a form of buddying. <670, 681 fit this> its like shes trying to get in your head and appear helpful and solving, when in reality she isn't putting in the work and she's making you do the brunt of it. she isnt outright doing stuff that will offend and trigger you, but shes doing it like back of the mind sort of thing 690 reads super buddyie imo
I would say that from the posts that you've referenced, Faker is more or less just being assertive.
However, I still don't think that she is trying to directly buddy because I can't help advance her wincon if she's scum.
In post 804, Meuh wrote:But then also they pushed each other from day 1, right? That makes less sense because Pooky getting to win sillyposting seemed unlikely at the time right?
So they wouldn't be planning that S/T stuff
In post 841, Faker wrote:Contextually this is a better explanation, but I actually find this somewhat persuasive because of the time difference.
There's a 12 minute difference, and I would not be surprised if RH9 realized afterwards that 485 was
before
Penguin posted. Having a townread on him would therefore make no sense, and this is something I think RH9 would feel compelled to fix as scum. It's a bit weird to come back later here as town.
It's NAI.
I do it when I realise that something's wrong with my memory.
I would like to give my thoughts on some scummy behaviour that I haven't seen yet but want all to be aware off.
In my experience, scum vote in Wall (SGB) before Gate (MD) is resolved.
While this hasn't occurred yet, I can't help but feel that it might happen.
Also, I am unhappy with how NAI things are being treated as AI.
I'm referring to our back and forth about why he was fine with me being so vocal and steering so much of this game, where he chalked the lesson of D&C more to the absence of Dunnstral.
This is a perfect example why the reasoning in 841 is faulty.
By your logic, I should be SRing you for clarifying.
In post 868, Faker wrote:It's nice of Dwlee99 but it's not like I don't solve or put in effort tracking as scum; my entire shtick is out-solving the town to strongarm and then use that position to control where attention goes. If RH9 is town and I'd be advancing a miselim great, but bussing is also pretty free for me with how the game currently is.
That's cool.
I didn't know that you had such a strong scumgame.
Now, I'm feeling worried that marci might be right that I should be concerned about buddy attempts.
Though, I feel concerned that marci might be trying to buddy me as of late.