It's not against site rules by default to discuss , although specifically disallowing players from discussing replacements in your game is a reasonable stance. The argument against making that a universal rule is along the lines of "It's a thing that players are going to consider anyways, making them fabricate cases based on that read just further taints the game state."In post 70, DkKoba wrote:it shouldnt be allowed tbqh
i myself specifically have a clause in my ruleset not to allow that kind of OGI :/
Regardless, in this case I see it as more a poorly phrased read of Andante's emotions immediately prior to the replace being town indicative, which is 100% fair game.
As far as the CSF lim went, the only way that got avoided was by faking a lot of investment and solve-yness, which is really hard to do. The lim wasn't motivated by a scumread, but a PoE read which is much harder to argue against. Everyone was convinced the PT was pure, but CSF was the least cleared/solvey slot and it makes sense that they'd be the first to go, which is unfortunately very hard to fight against.
Also, I'd like to take the opportunity to point out that my initial suggestion for Squid Game's parachutes would have been fine, you just had to absolute madlad it and I couldn't resist letting you torture yourself pooky.
I had envisioned a single post at the beginning like this:
I never intended you to just not sleep for three days.
(It was still funny as all hell though.)