Meow
Never gotten it to work and didn't care enough to keep trying.
What I did with Discord was just rip some random black cat picture off the internet because some server I was on demanded one.
We could try naming a current 0-poster at random just for funsies~
Got 'em.In post 22, marcistar wrote:wtf guys a little birdie told me roden rolled scum!!
You're the only two here I've played in a game before, though the game I was with Alex in isn't over yet so can't talk about it.
Oh you beat me to it
I'm more curious as to why he wants votes on you. The only reason we have so far is it's a countervote.In post 83, Roden wrote:I think it would be relevant to explain your town read on Marci when several people aren't vibing with that and want to vote her
This was an excellent way toIn post 98, Shoshin wrote:Scum are more likely to fake-claim than town.In post 95, Roden wrote:Why do you think it's more likely for scum to fake claim an absurd-sounding role than for scum to doubt an absurd-sounding role?
Yes, let's seriously come up with a scumteam based solely on a single point of interaction 80 posts into the game. That sure sounds serious~In post 88, marcistar wrote:why do u immediately jump to shitposting? LOL what if shoshins serious..
It can be if they can't come up with an answer on the spot, so they give an evasive non-answer instead that suits their narrative.In post 105, marcistar wrote:is it scummy of them to do that tho
The problem is the insistence it isn't meaningless.In post 110, marcistar wrote:why are u so pressed about it then if its meaningless?
In post 129, Shoshin wrote:What posts gave you town vibes from scamper, Ausuka?
Marci gave off "clueless, easily pocketed town" vibes (Shoshin being the one player to definitively call her town) from that post specifically. Admittedly if Shoshin is town, the chances it comes from scum are higher. It was a poor post for how hard it defended and I don't think that post is made if both are scum.In post 130, Ausuka wrote:In post 63, marcistar wrote: i dont really get good vibes from the posts. i think part of it is because the og claim (8) feels a bit over explanatory.
side note: if i have a game about a frog gf, and then i get a slurpee thats frog juice flavored, am i drinking my gf?Ok, first off I'd like to ask Marci what she thought was over explainy about my first post?? It was like three lines lmaoIn post 114, marcistar wrote:i don't see how thats scummy..?
why would scum want to naked vote and draw attention to themselves?
why would shoshinnotwant to shade people this early on? it'll cause reactions for sure and help better read people? like how ur having a tantrum over them scumreading you rn
why areyouframing everything they do in such a bad way? the certain words, "bullshitting", "dodging a question" its making a bigger deal of something than it should be.
why areyouexpecting shoshin to be perfect?
I don't really like the second post. I don't think she's wrong about Shoshin playing chaotically not being scummy, but something about the way she treats Crescent rubs me the wrong way, like she's trying to win an argument and isn't really worried about how this impacts Crescent's alignment. In particular, Crescent's posting up til this point felt fairly reasonable and describing it as a 'tantrum' seems unreasonably aggro. 'Why are you expecting Shoshin to be perfect' is also such a strange line; like, obviously Crescent isn't expecting Shoshin to be perfect just because she scumreads her posts??? Again it comes off as an argument winner line rather than someone genuinely interested in sorting the situation.
I could see scum Marci defending town Shoshin like this.
(I want to townread her for the frog posting though I love frogs)
In post 138, Alexcellent wrote:I like Datisi as townIn post 66, Datisi wrote:still think marci is scum and i'll be looking at everyone who is ignoring weighing in on this discussion
There aren't a lot of solid reads in this ISO, but this in particular is both early and explained only by a single post. Is there more to it?In post 138, Alexcellent wrote:I like Datisi as townIn post 66, Datisi wrote:still think marci is scum and i'll be looking at everyone who is ignoring weighing in on this discussion
It does feel completely over the top - Like a post that was made without any actual forethought. It's the kind of "what is this" earlygame post that a scum playerIn post 185, Ausuka wrote:It doesn't give pocketed town vibes to me. I could see how town Marci would instinctively townread Shoshin in this situation, but I think the way she goes about it isn't genuine for reasons I explained - the whole bit where she asks five rhetorical questions in quick succession, says you're having a tantrum and 'expecting Shoshin to be perfect' seems totally disconnected from what's actually going on and overall performative.In post 180, Crescent wrote:Marci gave off "clueless, easily pocketed town" vibes (Shoshin being the one player to definitively call her town) from that post specifically. Admittedly if Shoshin is town, the chances it comes from scum are higher. It was a poor post for how hard it defended and I don't think that post is made if both are scum.
Quick random thoughts instead because who legitimately has a lot of "reads" this early in a game?:In post 195, Shoshin wrote:If you're town, Crescent, you have nothing to worry about.
For the sake of discussion, assume I'm town for a second. What're your reads?
You just depicted exactly why scum so often gets away with this kind of behavior, thank you. It's basically puppetmastering half of the town against itself so obviously that people overlook just how obvious it is. I haven't seen a case of it this strong in a couple of years now. Every read that comes out of Shoshin feels completely manufactured, and then maybe after the fact one or two will actually be justified a bit. They can change "any read" they want any time they want and effectively get away with it, because they're so over the map that no one can follow them. There's nothing remotely resembling actual game solving from their posts.In post 212, scamper wrote:...whyIn post 103, marcistar wrote:bellaphant seems town.
dont like this eitherIn post 104, Crescent wrote:Oh no, I've drawn aggro from the guy who just expertly avoided actually answering the previous question asked to him.
ok but is that actually a scumtell?In post 109, Crescent wrote:Frankly though, he's already pointed out three people as scum, someone to be scum if we're not, and also said an inactive is probably scum so he's probably wrong on the three of us anyway.
It reeks of flinging poop around and seeing where it sticks. He's pretty well thrown shade at half the players in the game in the first 100 posts.
sdcumgenerallydoesnt try to make enemies with half the game right away. whats the purpose of "flinging poop around" if its likely to earn the ire of a bunch of people. even if i disagree with shoshin i dont think her reads are fake based on how shes explained them. this feels like omgus to me
My stance is just to ignore the claim and let Ausuka's play speak for itself.In post 220, scamper wrote:i already went over this but i dont think you can handwave things away as "WIFOM", u have to actually look at what is more/less likely and i think a miller claim is way more likely town than notIn post 144, Alexcellent wrote:So no reason for me NOT to believe Ausuka at this point, but I don't think it's impossible that scum makes that claim.
Hmm we get into WIFOM territory here though. Why would scum say ascetic miller and not just ascetic? Maybe so we can have this conversation. Good lies involve detail and ascetic miller is a way to say "omg guys look at this dumb role I've got, why is this a thing?" Rather than blindly going "I'm ascetic," and everyone has to decide if they believe it or not. Also the conversation is muddied a bit more because we're no longer just going "idk if I believe Ausuka", now we're going "why would this role exist?"In post 39, scamper wrote:i dont really think scum claims ascetic miller on page 1, i think if ascetic they just claim ascetic without the miller part, cuz the extra detail is unnecessary to invent. simplest explanation is aus got given an actual weird neg util role and claimed it
ill leave this here for now
VOTE: marci
But yeah, I'm just thinking out loud. This early in the game I'm happy to lean more towards accepting that there's an ascetic miller.
My play, especially on day 1, is often dictated by my overall mood and whatever out of game factors may be influencing me - Not on my alignment. I could see myself making most of the posts I have made today as scum. My town range is larger but not significantly so than my scum range, and my townslips often come from careless mistakes that I would never allow myself to make as scum, such as making mistakes with my flavor when claiming in a themed game.In post 223, Shoshin wrote:Crescent, what's the difference between your town play and scum play? Why should I believe this is town you?
IT'S A KITTY YAYIn post 227, Ausuka wrote:I still like scamper which is good because I don't think I could eliminate that avatar
I don't think this is an inherently scummy thing after just a day and a half. I also play much the same way - I tend to create content first, then start sorting people. You won't even see me place a vote until there's like, 48-72 hours left in any given day.In post 234, Ausuka wrote:See multiple people have said it's a playstyle read now and I don't get it.
I think his playstyle is even sort of towny - he comes off as naturally comfortable and somewhat charismatic to me.
I think the content of his posts is more scum motivated than town motivated for reasons I've tried to explain. I think he is more orientated towards creating whatever content than sorting people.
Second time someone's said I came off as defensive without providing an actual reason why, interesting.In post 241, scamper wrote:leaning scum because her response to you felt overly defensive, still catching up thoIn post 239, Shoshin wrote:Scamper, what're your thoughts on Crescent's alignment?
The issue I have is I feel like too many people are calling you town seemingly at random. I feel like it's become a very easy thing for scum to jump in on.In post 244, Datisi wrote:it's likelier town* townreads me here, imagine proofreading postsIn post 242, Datisi wrote:but i think it's likelier scum townreads me here
My top scum read (by far) is trying to ML me and I am not threatened by them trying to ML me.In post 256, Shoshin wrote:This post is very scummy.In post 248, Crescent wrote:Shoshin does not feel like a threat to ML me at all and is probably scum. If anything I'd say I come off as aggressive, not defensive.
Town don't usually think of the game in terms of "threats," that's more of how scum think.
Upset? No. I'm hunting my top scumread. What have I actually done to indicate being upset? Just because they're voting me doesn't make my read any less valid.In post 251, scamper wrote:u got called scum by shoshin and accused her of "shitposting", 100 feels very over the top annoyed at someone making an early team guess, i think the way you keep harping on her "avoiding answering the question" feels like trying to trying to string someone up on a triviality - she did answer it. it wasnt a good answer imo but it was an answer and treating it like shes dodging questions is disingenuous. then you accuse her of flinging poop just for making early accusations, like you want to discredit her read by by pointing out shes suspected a lot of people. all in all ypu just seem very upset over one person suggesting you might be scum very early into the game and i dont get why youre so worked up over it...In post 245, Crescent wrote:Second time someone's said I came off as defensive without providing an actual reason why, interesting.In post 241, scamper wrote:leaning scum because her response to you felt overly defensive, still catching up thoIn post 239, Shoshin wrote:Scamper, what're your thoughts on Crescent's alignment?
I remember you TRed me so quickly in MN2272 (I think it was post #60) it made me suspicious of you, but I don't recall anything that feels like this coming from you early on in that game.In post 259, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like one of shishon/crescent is scum but not entirely sure which
would guess shoshin atm tho
Aussie....? Who is this even referring to? Ausuka?In post 266, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Phone posting from work so I don't get prodded, only thing worth talking about in the first couple pages is aussie town. Anybody wanna sell me on something while I got time?
Sorry but probably nothing is going to beat the neighborhood of 2272 which was 1 scum and the three inactive town that all had to be replaced.In post 273, Save The Dragons wrote:I wish it's pretty dead
Scamper vibes like they're trying to set up voting me later by consistently focusing on only one aspect of me and Shoshin while not directly calling me scum. It feels a lot more calculated than the way Marci had an outburst and moved on.In post 285, Gamma Emerald wrote:How soIn post 265, Crescent wrote:Oh and on another Scamper note, I think their interactions with me have been scummier than Marci's by a fair margin. Why is Marci still at 4 again?
I liked their catch-up tbh
I've been playing for over 7 years and have watched games for longer.In post 298, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Newb tell newb tellIn post 294, Crescent wrote:Because chaos isnaturallyscum indicative. Chaos is inherently anti-town and often leads to bad voteoffs that provide little to no information. There's no pro-town reason for playing with that level of chaos.
Why would a a neighborhood make the claim any more or less believeable? This question was immediately asked and ignored by her only followup post in 324.In post 299, Bellaphant wrote:It depends what kind of chaos - flooding the thread, scum theatre, etc, but in terms of reads, pushes, etc, I find town to be way more chaotic.
The neighbourhood is interesting, though. I believe ausuka's claim even more now.
In post 307, JohnnyFarrar wrote:It was jokes I hadn't read but like 2 postsIn post 209, Crescent wrote:Johnny popping in to say "I exist" and then immediately top townreading the one person to reply to him with zero reasoning as his only two posts is a concerning opener. This has gone so under the radar no one has even talked about it yet. I'd like to hear why that townread was given out when he posts next.
In post 303, JohnnyFarrar wrote:I take back that townread datsIn post 149, Datisi wrote:suspicious of roden because the early townread of shoshin for "solving behind the scenes" seems (1) kinda awkwardly explained, (2) seems like tmi? like, i'm a bit skeptical that he saw two basically naked votes and decided there's some townie solving happening there
This is the only post of yours that really justifies the Bella vote at all, and it's... Very wishy washy.In post 362, Alexcellent wrote:There is no progression over the 24hrs. I just decided to vote there.In post 338, Roden wrote:This vote from Alex in particular feels scummy. It's a bit delayed to vote Bella now when their previous interactions were 24 hours earlier and nothing solvey had come out of it. I'm just not seeing much of a progression here.
VOTE: Alex
Tbh I have no major scum reads, D1 is always a crapshoot for me. But the Marci train felt kind of off to me. Maybe it's all town, but I felt like if scum were on it, it's probably Bella (as opposed to scamper/datisi/ausuka)? Felt the most opportunistic, 60 felt vague. There's nothing super strong or that jumps out to me as particularly townie in her ISO and the fact others have called her town with very little content makes me interested in a flip there as well for the sake of sorting other people. She's unvoted Marci not all that long after she voted her and I can see town doing that, but could also see scum doing that too. As I said, not a strong read but I feel like my vote's wasted if I'm not using it.
Probably 'cause that vote on me went absolutely nowhere despite being on for like 36 hours so the "chaos" demands a new target.In post 350, Ausuka wrote:Shoshin the confusion is that you keep like flipping your reads without explaining why
Like I could've sworn Gamma was one of your top townreads yesterday and now he's your top scumread
And also you were like hard pushing Crescent and now she's townier than Marcistar who you've been defending all game
So you jumped onto an active train on Bellaphant for.. What actual reasons, exactly?In post 370, Alexcellent wrote:In post 366, Crescent wrote:This is the only post of yours that really justifies the Bella vote at all, and it's... Very wishy washy.In post 362, Alexcellent wrote:There is no progression over the 24hrs. I just decided to vote there.In post 338, Roden wrote:This vote from Alex in particular feels scummy. It's a bit delayed to vote Bella now when their previous interactions were 24 hours earlier and nothing solvey had come out of it. I'm just not seeing much of a progression here.
VOTE: Alex
Tbh I have no major scum reads, D1 is always a crapshoot for me. But the Marci train felt kind of off to me. Maybe it's all town, but I felt like if scum were on it, it's probably Bella (as opposed to scamper/datisi/ausuka)? Felt the most opportunistic, 60 felt vague. There's nothing super strong or that jumps out to me as particularly townie in her ISO and the fact others have called her town with very little content makes me interested in a flip there as well for the sake of sorting other people. She's unvoted Marci not all that long after she voted her and I can see town doing that, but could also see scum doing that too. As I said, not a strong read but I feel like my vote's wasted if I'm not using it.
I have read that post. I was directly responding to that post twice. What I don't see is any strong reason to be jumping on Bella's train.In post 374, Ausuka wrote:Is it weird? I don't like answering questions for other people, but in this case she already answered the question and three separate people have asked about it. That's what I find weird.
I feel like Alex is focusing on the wrong things right now. It kinda feels like he's trying to use this to retroactively justify his vote without directly shading Ausuka and it's weird.In post 386, Ausuka wrote:Ok but likeIn post 381, Alexcellent wrote:This isn't necessarily related to a push, more-so prevents her reaction. She may come in and continue to try and explain her position or have a different response than what she's already given for whatever reason (it's not common but I've seen scum do it). You repeatedly coming in to redirect people to where she's answered is speaking for her. Like yeah, it's overall pretty minor and probably nothing comes from it anyway but it's just odd to me that you've done it more than once now.In post 380, Ausuka wrote:@Alex; That makes no sense? If I think something is weird or scummy I'm not going to avoid talking about it just because someone else could handle it. I understand that it tends to be bad to answer questions for someone else - although I don't think I've ever seen someone call it alignment indicative - but this is at most tangentially related to that and comes off as a massive stretch of a push.
1) it doesn't prevent her reaction at all
2) I think the idea that the same question being asked multiple times is somehow meant to generate particularly useful content is nonsense, and I think pursuing why people are throwing out questions so easily is much more interesting