VOTE: Galron
OMGUS
~GE
i thought there was more reason to like u than just this but i think im mixing u up with encahntIn post 32, Bell wrote:Mafia is not determined by flavor.
Nvm. Skimmed rules.
Also I joined a bastard game.
And roles don’t flip with alignment. Which is fine because honestly I just get confused with roles anyway
I swear Pooky was town when he did it in GuitaristsIn post 99, Bell wrote:One day I will not try to kill your when you try to start a cult midgame.
As soon as you stop being scum every time you try to start one.
Today is maybe or maybe not that day.
I did miss playing with you pooky.
Nostalgia is the only drug I need.
so it's like Game of ThronesIn post 129, Lukewarm wrote:I loved the first like 4 Seasons of Lost. I watched it all with my sister as it aired, and then when I got married I rewatched the whole show with my husband. I definitely recommend anyone who has not seen it to give it a try.In post 108, MalcolmTucker wrote:From a brief catchup it seems nobody here watched it. Heard it got rubbish towards the end anyway.In post 105, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Me neither - we should do a watch party where we livetweet our reactions in this threadIn post 104, MalcolmTucker wrote:Never actually got round to watching Lost when it came out.
Spoiler:
(It does lose itself a little towards the end. Seasons 5 was good, but not great. Final season is kinda disappointing imo)
mmm i wouldnt know.. i tried googling lost and it said 2004 and i was like "nope"In post 117, Bell wrote:Roles and flavor seem to align.In post 110, Off The Hook wrote:what does knowing the flavor or not have to do with the game
That’s it.
this feels weird.. why r u defending bellaphant?In post 124, Rad wrote:But I must defend Bella. Town has plenty of room for Bell-types.In post 16, Klick wrote:VOTE: Bellaphant
It feels necessary to eliminate you or Bell today so that people don't get confused between the two of you. You're not here to defend yourself, so you're naturally the easier choice.
VOTE: Klick
I like Toad saying this, I completly forgot about that post from Rad and its a good point.In post 126, The toad wrote:'happy to be town' feels off.In post 123, Rad wrote:How's that wolfy? *growls*In post 107, The toad wrote:Wolfy entrance.In post 81, Rad wrote:I never watched Lost so all flavor is completely, ahem, lost on me. Happy to be town though!
VOTE: Rad
Lukewarm and Bell give early towny vibes.
lets not then..In post 130, Lukewarm wrote:I think that you could potentially guess someone's role based on their flavor. Like, if someone's Flavor is Jack, I would assume them to be a doctor tbh.In post 110, Off The Hook wrote:what does knowing the flavor or not have to do with the game
was this serious?
im conflicted about this post, since i dont see the need to even say the first part its like teasing us : P I think scum might be motivated to do that, as leaving it vague like that leaves them to warp their claim to what fits with later on claimsIn post 138, Cephrir wrote:hi my role has a drawback and i haven't decided yet whether to claim harder than that or not
VOTE: enchant i don't think a rock will help us survive this situation
don't really like either of these popins tbhs.
cuz..?In post 159, Malakittens wrote:I think Luke is town!!!!!!
cephrir whats hated mean?In post 210, Cephrir wrote:What if we didn't do this every time
I guess I should out my drawback as Hated if we're doing this again
I tag all my posts as ~GE, you were probably responding to marci as I haven't interacted w you yetIn post 255, Bell wrote:@Gamma, sure yeah. Flavor could help with identifying the legitimacy of a claim. Please don't go overboard Lost watchers.
I was confused by this then realized Dancing Puppets hadn't posted yet.In post 253, Frogsterking wrote:I'm becoming increasingly suspicious of both the hydra slots
i cant tell i think its hard to tell what u mean by things..In post 239, PenguinPower wrote:do you think it was?In post 214, Off The Hook wrote:was this serious?
i like dunnstral : DDIn post 245, Dunnstral wrote:I don't think we should continue to push Cephrir without pointing to real reasons for doing so. Partially because it would be annoying for them, and partially because there are several people who voted for Cephrir who haven't given any reasoning for why they are doing so.
...In post 251, Galron wrote:oh shitIn post 243, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:clearly Ceph is Hated Godfather
VOTE: cephrir
whyIn post 253, Frogsterking wrote:I'm becoming increasingly suspicious of both the hydra slots
i think bells a clown if he hasnt noticed its just mainly me postingIn post 258, Off The Hook wrote:I tag all my posts as ~GE, you were probably responding to marci as I haven't interacted w you yetIn post 255, Bell wrote:@Gamma, sure yeah. Flavor could help with identifying the legitimacy of a claim. Please don't go overboard Lost watchers.
~GE aka Gamma
am i meant to know this?In post 264, PenguinPower wrote:i think it's very rare to find where i have serious votes that early in the game...i think that's common knowledgeIn post 261, Off The Hook wrote:i cant tell i think its hard to tell what u mean by things..
they claimed their post restriction in their first postIn post 268, Frogsterking wrote:In post 259, Off The Hook wrote:I was confused by this then realized Dancing Puppets hadn't posted yet.In post 253, Frogsterking wrote:I'm becoming increasingly suspicious of both the hydra slots
~GETo clarify, both the hydras who have been posting are the ones I've started suspecting. I wasn't counting Dancing Puppets.In post 260, Off The Hook wrote:What's suspect about ircher/rh9? I'm more interested in your thoughts there vs. on us because they have the post restriction
~GE
I didn't realize ircher/rh9 had a post restriction. I thought they seemed like they are holding info back and spreading their game posts out between here and another thread.
idk about marci but I tend to ask seemingly filler question in certain circumstances, like when trying to filter out paranoid thoughts on TRsIn post 270, Frogsterking wrote:I think you've asked a number of go-nowhere questions for the sake of appearing active.In post 261, Off The Hook wrote:
whyIn post 253, Frogsterking wrote:I'm becoming increasingly suspicious of both the hydra slots
if it was i completely missed itIn post 274, PenguinPower wrote:pretty sure it was brought up there tbhIn post 265, Off The Hook wrote:am i meant to know this?In post 264, PenguinPower wrote:i think it's very rare to find where i have serious votes that early in the game...i think that's common knowledgeIn post 261, Off The Hook wrote:i cant tell i think its hard to tell what u mean by things..
i only remember playing that discord moderator game with u
okay cool, I'll only skim and take in the bare minimum needed to process what's going onIn post 292, PenguinPower wrote:Having a good understanding of the game state this early on points to informed knowledge. yes - that's weird.In post 291, Rad wrote:Wait, so having a strong understanding of what's happened so far in the game is SCUMMY to you? lolIn post 289, Frogsterking wrote:I can argue that this is showing a higher awareness of the gamestate which can be viewed as cautious/scummy.
Is this a common belief?
that didn't take longIn post 297, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think what you said feels off from youIn post 295, PenguinPower wrote:because that's what i saidIn post 294, Off The Hook wrote:okay cool, I'll only skim and take in the bare minimum needed to process what's going onIn post 292, PenguinPower wrote:Having a good understanding of the game state this early on points to informed knowledge. yes - that's weird.In post 291, Rad wrote:Wait, so having a strong understanding of what's happened so far in the game is SCUMMY to you? lolIn post 289, Frogsterking wrote:I can argue that this is showing a higher awareness of the gamestate which can be viewed as cautious/scummy.
Is this a common belief?
~GE
why do you think gamestate knowledge this early is scummy
also I wouldn't even call what I was talking about that frogster took issue with gamestate awareness, it was just a post that I read
~GE
okay, and being keen on the gamestate early vs, later on is scummy how?In post 301, PenguinPower wrote:because early game is lowinfo? like is that a real question?In post 297, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think what you said feels off from youIn post 295, PenguinPower wrote:because that's what i saidIn post 294, Off The Hook wrote:okay cool, I'll only skim and take in the bare minimum needed to process what's going onIn post 292, PenguinPower wrote:Having a good understanding of the game state this early on points to informed knowledge. yes - that's weird.In post 291, Rad wrote:Wait, so having a strong understanding of what's happened so far in the game is SCUMMY to you? lolIn post 289, Frogsterking wrote:I can argue that this is showing a higher awareness of the gamestate which can be viewed as cautious/scummy.
Is this a common belief?
~GE
why do you think gamestate knowledge this early is scummy
also I wouldn't even call what I was talking about that frogster took issue with gamestate awareness, it was just a post that I read
~GE
I wasn't referring to whatever "frogster took issue with" - I was making a general point.
okay yeah I don't think that matches my idea of itIn post 313, PenguinPower wrote:The overall understanding of the game?
In post 384, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Hwat
From when I hydra’d with her, it helps her read the game easierIn post 385, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Why?
do you think C+G are scum?In post 508, T-Bone wrote:The mistakes are the reason I decided to call attention to it. I was suspicious when I first saw it but wasn't gonna bring it up right away. Maybe I should have let them make a few more mistakes before I said anything but that's on me.In post 501, MalcolmTucker wrote:If they were going to fake a restriction though, wouldn't you expect them to be doubly sure how they were going to go about it before committing? It strikes me as an especially convoluted and weird thing for a hydra to make up in particular on D1, when coordinating a hydra can be a difficult job anyway, especially if said hydra is scum. And given the size of the game, being able to successfully coast through D1 could be of limited advantage anyway considering there'll likely be lots of phases.In post 490, T-Bone wrote:If signatures don't count, why not use them every post? In the very few posts you've made I don't feel like you've been either careful with your words or consistent in your application. It looks like to me you're making it up on the fly (or that you and your partner didn't agree how to fake the restriction).In post 464, Cytosine and Guanine wrote:Which part?In post 463, T-Bone wrote:In post 421, Cytosine and Guanine wrote:STD said signatures don't count.
What a fake post restriction if I've ever saw one.
I'm skeptical for other reasons that I'll discuss with the other players, but we can start there.
Look, I am aware that if the restriction is real I risk wasting your word counts or whatever, and you're limited in your ability to explain... but how everyone else reacted is exactly how you would want if you were faking a restriction. Sorry, thems the breaks.
To make players like you ask that question rhetorically as if it was self evident they were town.Enchant wrote:Why EVER fake restrictions.
If you find yourself asking why would (player) do (thing) if they were scum...then my friend you are the gullible target audience.
In post 517, Frogsterking wrote:I'm reading my interaction with Galron as SvT.
good sorting, and good thought, I notice scum tend to group up with a townie and try to mirror thoughts with that one townie intentionallyIn post 521, Lukewarm wrote:In post 519, Frogsterking wrote:Do you think it's more likely to come from mistaken town or scum trying to stir up trouble (or other?)In post 518, Lukewarm wrote:Meh, I was being non-serious at the start of moderators as well.In post 516, Lukewarm wrote:This is funny to me, because this is the least serious I have taken a game in a while.
But my point stands.
I was have purposefully tried to take this game less seriously, and this is the second time someone said that I was being extra serious earlyIn post 340, Rad wrote:Luke's ISO reads like it's serious from the startIn post 343, Galron wrote:In post 340, Rad wrote:Luke's ISO reads like it's serious from the start, and all I really got out of it was 2 bad town reads and a lot of nothing.
Rad's prob townIt feels like Galron lifted the idea straight off of Rad.In post 512, Galron wrote:Luke started very serious out of the gate, like rvs didn't exist. Too much caffeine?
I don't think that Galron and Rad are scum together, but I think that there is probably scum in the pair.
Isn't the Sibling role a variant Mason that knows the other's alignment but lacks a PT with them? If that's correct Toog's POV is 100% logical. Sure flavor and alignment are distinct but I don't believe the same could be said about role and alignment?In post 657, Toogeloo wrote:My PT partner brought up the fact that they don't trust me, that I could be scum, and that I basically asked for a free pass through Day 1.
For those not in the know, I was involved in a head on collision last Friday night. My kids were in the car with me. I was ambulances to the ER, but thankfully my kids walked away with minor injuries.
I am doing some daily physical therapy and we are working with lawyers and insurance right now, and in my down time I am trying to relax and rest.
I don't anticipate this being problematic beyond this week, but if people feel I'm getting a pass, or need to replace out, I will.
---
I have not read anything other than my PT. I actually didn't consider the possibility that my partner might consider us unaligned. Based on my show knowledge, I actually would have thought us Masons if my PM didn't specifically call us neighbors.
My role is Shannon, my partner is Boone. We are in a PT called Kissing Siblings, which I don't recall them being incestual at all, lol.
At any rate, I will get to this eventually.
thisIn post 677, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:winning/losing has nothing to do with your ability/skill
~GEIn post 693, Off The Hook wrote:thisIn post 677, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:winning/losing has nothing to do with your ability/skill
I had a time where I played the scumgame of my life on my homesite and then proceeded to lose like 20 scumgames in a row on here
i think the fact that u didnt follow this up with a vote makes u scummy.In post 284, T-Bone wrote:Okay I caught up. Someone talk me out of the vote I'm gonna make, cause it'll be on scum. You have until the time it takes for me to format the vote. Maybe through a segment of BB too. Ready. Set. Go.
im kinda starting to come around on this, i dont think frogster has the best intentions really.In post 326, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Frogster's obviously scum but can we pretend we don't know that for the next 4 days to get some more info out of him before we inevitably feed him to the polar bears?
r u making any attempts to look into it tho? part of the reason why originally i was fine with voting u was that saying somethings interesting is easy, and then not trying to look into it is just like making empty promises i feel.In post 336, Rad wrote:I think the wagon on Ceph was interesting but not sure what I can get out of it yet.
i dont see y u would think this..? rn johnnys currently still null for me, i don't think hes done anything particularly aiIn post 358, Frogsterking wrote:I'm tempted to townread Johnny here.
this feels overly cautiousIn post 367, Rad wrote:or scum!Frogster knows something special (this is not shade, I have no read on him right now, I repeat not shade, any scum would know something special, just saying).
ur so funny roden!! but do u have more to say at all?
In post 472, Lukewarm wrote:I am realizing that without flips showing that Me, my neighbor, Toog, or Toog's neighbor flipping as neighbors that it will actually be kinda messy for someone to claim it after the death of their neighbor.
i like this post a lot ^.^In post 496, Enchant wrote:Did you just pull all lurkers in list.
i expected you to be more excited to play the game based on how excited you seemed in the signup thread, but you aren't really efforting too much... are you scum?
ur nastyIn post 719, Bell wrote:@Marci you’re weird.
yeah i got that it was a joke or whateverIn post 747, T-Bone wrote:But to get serious for a moment. I get that I am making a lot of jokey and taunting posts in this game, that I would understand if anyone thought that was all I was doing. I like to have fun between more serious posts because of how often I believe players actually make alignment indicative posts (hint: not often). But this post I quoted is a long 'catch up' post. Certainly by 704 you'd have enough context to, if you wanted to key in on how I'm playing, go after my game posts, and not this random one. But you didn't and here we are, me following through, and you being.... followed through on...question mark?In post 742, T-Bone wrote:VOTE: Off the HookIn post 704, Off The Hook wrote:i think the fact that u didnt follow this up with a vote makes u scummy.In post 284, T-Bone wrote:Okay I caught up. Someone talk me out of the vote I'm gonna make, cause it'll be on scum. You have until the time it takes for me to format the vote. Maybe through a segment of BB too. Ready. Set. Go.
:
Gottem
In post 775, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:hey I make memes about the Animal Police Department when I'm town too
Accidental page tops happen a lot for meIn post 776, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:oh snap i wasn't even trying to get that one
You should trust me on the Titus headIn post 790, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:D4?! yo I have the attention span of a cat, I hope it'll be sooner than that, esp bc I can't read Titus at all
Nothing yet but my read accuracy on her is pretty good I’d sayIn post 845, Dancing Puppets wrote:What did you say about Titus? All I recall was you confirming what she said about reading everything backwards?In post 837, Off The Hook wrote:You should trust me on the Titus headIn post 790, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:D4?! yo I have the attention span of a cat, I hope it'll be sooner than that, esp bc I can't read Titus at all
~GE
~GEIn post 848, Off The Hook wrote:Nothing yet but my read accuracy on her is pretty good I’d sayIn post 845, Dancing Puppets wrote:What did you say about Titus? All I recall was you confirming what she said about reading everything backwards?In post 837, Off The Hook wrote:You should trust me on the Titus headIn post 790, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:D4?! yo I have the attention span of a cat, I hope it'll be sooner than that, esp bc I can't read Titus at all
~GE
In post 956, Bell wrote:I have a lot of people to make up shit on and be wrong about. This is going to be my largest work yet.
i think this shows bellaphant isnt reading LOLIn post 957, Bellaphant wrote:It's really early here but I can't even work out if these are town or scum reads. Can you expand on any of them?In post 934, JohnnyFarrar wrote:PookyTheMagicalBear
Rad
Corwinoid
Dunnstral
JohnnyFarrar
Cytosine and Guanine (Ircher and RH9)
T-Bone
Cat Scratch
Lukewarm
I reserve the right to add/remove
In post 969, Bell wrote:I'm okay ignoring the weird vibes Gamma is giving off this game because why try to sort them if Marci is town.
logic'd
im still pretty conflicted on cephrir, i could see alot of his posts being made as either alignment. like my og thought on this post was that its townie but then i try and think deeper and its justIn post 978, Cephrir wrote:i don't even remember that game but no i am not going to give all hydras bonus points for being hydras and i dont think there's anything wild about that