No witty entrance post?In post 18, Enchant wrote:Hello Everyone.
VOTE: Enchant
No witty entrance post?In post 18, Enchant wrote:Hello Everyone.
I'm not seeing it.In post 31, Prince of Paterson wrote:Reading more carefully, you should be able to figure out that was a witty entrance post.In post 30, Greeting wrote:Greetings!
No witty entrance post?In post 18, Enchant wrote:Hello Everyone.Enchantconfscum.
VOTE: Enchant
VOTE: Greeting
Thanks. I could continue arguing about the witty part, but there's no point in me doing so.In post 35, Crescent wrote: Enchant was pretty obviously mocking the thing going on between Vivax and Owen. It's clear enough even I figured out the intent
In my last game we had someone summarising everything going in the game too and they were town. So yeah, I agree.In post 40, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Me reading too much into this post: This post seems to be coming from a town player.In post 33, Vivax wrote:Can't read too much into things yet.
FancyPants only posted once.
MegAzumaril has a point. Second line of my post could imply a joke. Post was explained as gut-based already though.
Greeting calls Enchant's second post their entry post.
Patersons objection seems like the kind of entry point I'd make as scum when seeing a town accusing another town while making an easy to spot mistake.
This doesn't change the fact that it's both an easy way to produce content and unnecessary/annoying. Datisi isn't a lousy mod in my experience and can handle vote counts on his own easily.In post 54, MalcolmTucker wrote:This feels like something scum could easily feign annoyance over for the sake of an early vote to look busy.In post 52, Andante wrote:can we not post a VC for every single vote please... if you do it, please just throw it in a spoiler, but spamming "unnoficial" VCs for every single vote is not appreciated... you literally posted 3 on 1 page... and no one changed votes in the span of you posting them
VOTE: Fredrick A Campbell
I'm not entirely sure where you're coming from with this question.In post 86, FancyPants wrote:@Greeting/Bugspray, do you generally find LAMIST posts to be scum aligned?
In post 154, Prince of Paterson wrote:Does anyone else agree with Vivax's interpretation? This is a strange hill for him to choose to die on. I think it's a little towny to do so, though. Town often have a lot of pride in their own view of things.
DoesIn post 169, Lowell wrote: This is an ISO read of someone who wanted to have a fun game but is disappointed to have drawn scum.
I couldn't, because I don't know. It sounds like a grudge from a past game to me.In post 183, UNOwen wrote:Could you expand on what you think is going on between me and Vivax?In post 176, Greeting wrote: I am townreadingVivaxfor tone, this thing going on between them is NAI imo. 119 suggests it's something coming from a past game.
And whose alt are you? You seem knowledgeable about the site for someone who joined May 29, 2022.In post 208, Vivax wrote:This (bugspray) reeks heavily of a not_mafia alt.
But… it’s irrelevant whether you’ve played this game for long or short on other sites. The point I was making regarded your familiarity with this site, and specifically Not_Mafia, which isn’t something I expected from someone who has been here for so short.In post 303, Vivax wrote:@Greeting
I don't use alts and I played this game for a very long time elsewhere with extraordinarily active players.
If you say that you don't know what I'm implying and then why did you make post 208 in which you compared the playstyle ofIn post 312, Vivax wrote:And you‘re asking me about not_mafia in a game he‘s not in, which implies you know something that I don‘t.In post 309, Greeting wrote:But… it’s irrelevant whether you’ve played this game for long or short on other sites. The point I was making regarded your familiarity with this site, and specifically Not_Mafia, which isn’t something I expected from someone who has been here for so short.In post 303, Vivax wrote:@Greeting
I don't use alts and I played this game for a very long time elsewhere with extraordinarily active players.
Can we just stick to try and having a normal game of mafia?
I see no difference between his behaviour (In post 328, FancyPants wrote:The Fred and Azumaril wagons are bad, everyone should vote Malcom.
It's a bad ISO. I also have a gut feeling that something's not quite right here. I have played withIn post 345, Crescent wrote:Greeting.... Another vote on Meg.. Another player that provides no reason for voting Meg. #177 seems like it's setting up a bad pretext to vote them, and the vote itself just comes out of nowhere.
I forgot you were even in this game.In post 351, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: EnchantIn post 320, Enchant wrote:FancyPants* - lurk idk
Vivax - troll town
MalcolmTucker - prob maf
Greeting - idk always failed at reading
Firebringer - hot null would't care to vote
Fredrick A Campbell - can afford to die
Dwlee99* - lurk
Crescent - eh idk
Lowell - prob town
bugspray - always failed at reading
PookyTheMagicalBear - always mafia
geraintm - prob maf
UNOwen - idk i started yawning at this guy, pretend that's there's something funny drawn at next 3 persons and i call it a day, too much effort for me
Prince of Paterson
Andante
MegAzumarill
When has Enchant ever made a reads list
In post 473, FancyPants wrote:Scum: MalcolmTucker (non-commital scum) /Bugspray (Lurking scum)/Geraintm(Newb-scum) /PookyTheMagicalBear(Experienced scum who's sad they rolled scum)
Maybe's: Firebringger/Dwlee99/Lowell
This is the post I use to gloat endgame.
Will defend these opinions to the death, come at me.
Did you have COVID-19?In post 458, Crescent wrote:On an unrelated game note, I've been cleared to return back to work effective Monday.
I said you were the scummiest of these four, not in the game.In post 492, geraintm wrote:I wonder why people.are.oicking me as scum.day 1s nowadays? But to call me newb scum is weird. And to say I am thr scummiest person in the game? Is anyone actually voting me to back up that claim? I wish people would so I remember who was trying to get me eliminated laterIn post 486, Greeting wrote:In post 473, FancyPants wrote:Scum: MalcolmTucker (non-commital scum) /Bugspray (Lurking scum)/Geraintm(Newb-scum) /PookyTheMagicalBear(Experienced scum who's sad they rolled scum)
Maybe's: Firebringger/Dwlee99/Lowell
This is the post I use to gloat endgame.
Will defend these opinions to the death, come at me.geraintmis the scummiest of these four.Pookyis just being himself to be fair.
I have read your ISO and the reasoning is kinda murky to me. You have a lot of posts too.In post 498, Vivax wrote:It’s in my ISO, and I’m not sold that he’s scum. But I see that there’s resistance to treat him like any other player in the game and that bugs me. I’m known to preferentially attack so called primadonnas.
Would it be better for town if I tunnelled my main scumread until death/endgame (whichever came first) and stubbornly claimed this is the only way forward?In post 502, geraintm wrote:Naughty point for youIn post 501, Greeting wrote:I am giving you a chance to change my mind and convince me to go with you, it's up to you if you want it or not.
Alright, well, I think I've made my opinion on that player very clear. Like, the thought of eliminating him makes me want to literally shrug because he's a coaster, and the chances of him being mafia are average at best.In post 503, Vivax wrote:Will get to it when off work, but it’s more likely I don’t case Owen here. I just dislike it when mafia becomes a game of politics and I think he’s being a beneficiary of that so he can play subpar and get away with it.
I’m not planning on voting forIn post 510, geraintm wrote:No, but asking for permission to vote someone from another rpkayer to me always seems bad.In post 504, Greeting wrote:Would it be better for town if I tunnelled my main scumread until death/endgame (whichever came first) and stubbornly claimed this is the only way forward?In post 502, geraintm wrote:Naughty point for youIn post 501, Greeting wrote:I am giving you a chance to change my mind and convince me to go with you, it's up to you if you want it or not.
I don't like it
VOTE: meg
Scummy half-naked votes towards the end of theIn post 541, Prince of Paterson wrote:Hadn't really thought Meg was scummy previously, but this is actually fairly convincing reasoning. I'm okay with this, maybe Pooky is right after all.In post 539, UNOwen wrote:Since Meg hasn't answered still, the reason I'm asking about his opinion on the wagon is that I'd expect someone who had the reaction they had to the mini pileup on Fred would also show a bit of concern about scum being involved in the almost completely unexplained five vote wagon against himself. Responding to it by ignoring the votes and instead accusing FancyPants of tmi for calling it a bad wagon doesn't seem consistent. To me it looks like Meg couldn't tell whether the wagon was a bluff or not and didn't want to risk looking scummy by overreacting.
VOTE: MegAzumarill
That's another misrepresentation. Both you andIn post 605, geraintm wrote:I think this is your second list now scum and me being thr only overlap and yet you aren't voting me....In post 603, Greeting wrote:There is definitely scum in {Lowell,Prince of Paterson,MegAzumarill,geraintm,FancyPants}. Perhaps even more than half of them are scum.
In post 130, Greeting wrote:Maybe ifgeraintmis scum, then so isMegAzumarilland 117 was faked as a response to a likely true concern (which both a town and scum player could have). Admittedly though, this could also be scumMegtrying to pocketgeraintm.
Megis playing differently to what I remember, both as scum and town too.
This is a mental note to myself to come back to sort these two later in the game.
Why?
I read back, and to be fair, this bus doesn't look good. But overall he doesn't seem very scummy.In post 757, Enchant wrote:Ultimate obvious bus.
I overlooked that post but yes, you are correct in that it does point towards townIn post 773, Crescent wrote:Gera's last two posts of the day are not posts I see him making as scum. Gera doesn't naughty point someone for a hammer if he knows the guy is going to flip scum.
In post 782, UNOwen wrote:Malcolm's hammer was bad, he needs to explain what arguments he was convinced by and why it took him until Meg was at E-1 to be convinced.
Claiming Gunsmith is not automatically town indicative. There could be a mafia-aligned Gunsmith, and if there is,In post 818, Crescent wrote:Also Bugspray randomly claiming GS as scum to start day 2 would be insane why are they even on your list?
I would not make assumptions about what a closed setup is and whatnot, and even less would I treat them as fact and assume that the opposite is 'bonkers'. That's all I have to say on the matter of setup speculation.In post 830, Crescent wrote:Because it's statistically the most likely PR town has given the setup. Claiming the role blind at the start of the day is absolutely bonkers unless they have a reason to think otherwise.In post 828, Firebringer wrote:ummm its very easy to fake claim gunsmith as mafia.In post 826, Crescent wrote:Only way he's scum is if he's actually "scum aligned gunsmith", or scum otherwiseIn post 823, Firebringer wrote:Or you know....if bs is mafia. They are just faking being gunsmith. The idea they have to be gunsmith is weird idea to assume is the truthful part if you think could be mafia.In post 820, Greeting wrote:Claiming Gunsmith is not automatically town indicative. There could be a mafia-aligned Gunsmith, and if there is,In post 818, Crescent wrote:Also Bugspray randomly claiming GS as scum to start day 2 would be insane why are they even on your list?bugspraycould be trying to gain towncred by claiming this and working with town.knowstown doesn't have a gunsmith, or else he gets instantly countered and slaughtered.
Between that and Fred countertraining him against Meg, I don't even have an interest in humoring Bugspray being scum at the moment.
why would scum assume town has a gunsmith here to counter?
Wait why am i going down this argument.
We both agree Bug isn't mafia. I should avoid pointless arguments
Well, my mind registered you as solely interacting withIn post 825, Firebringer wrote:i am interested in what i have done that is shadyIn post 814, Greeting wrote:I suppose I could leave Firebringer and geraintm out for the time being. Although I am not very sure about these two, they have given me some stuff to townread them for, while the rest are all kinda shady.
Do you think we have 4 scums then, as in 3 left? Or 6 scums and 5 left? Not sure how to interpret your answer.In post 816, Crescent wrote:I've been led to believe that 4 scum in minis and 5 scum in larges is effectively a hard no here. In 2272 I immediately assumed 4 scum in the game and was shot down on that rather quickly.In post 814, Greeting wrote:So I just did an exercise where I took the names of all remaining players and removed the ones I'm townreading. Order is not relevant.
{Unsure,Firebringer,Fredrick A Campbell,Dwlee99,Lowell,bugspray,geraintm,UNOwen,Prince of Paterson}
I suppose I could leaveFirebringerandgeraintmout for the time being. Although I am not very sure about these two, they have given me some stuff to townread them for, while the rest are all kinda shady.Crescentmade a good observation aboutgera.
I overlooked that post but yes, you are correct in that it does point towards townIn post 773, Crescent wrote:Gera's last two posts of the day are not posts I see him making as scum. Gera doesn't naughty point someone for a hammer if he knows the guy is going to flip scum.geraintm.
{Unsure,Fredrick A Campbell,Dwlee99,Lowell,bugspray,UNOwen,Prince of Paterson}
If I am correct, all the remaining mafia should be amongst the remaining seven. If we had a 5-member scumteam then more than half of them are scum, and if we had a 3-member scumteam then it's almost half.
I ignored this question before, because the answer to it is in the very post you quoted.In post 867, UNOwen wrote:Yo, Greeting:In post 822, UNOwen wrote:Why?In post 819, Greeting wrote:Most likely one of them is, least likely both are town.
Let me tell you that I actually thinkIn post 870, Andante wrote: @Greeting
I think Dwlee is town, based off Meg's actions. Meg's first RVS vote was Dwlee, and bugspray's duel thing day 1 was probably gunsmith related, and I can see town doing that. so I would take those 2 out of the poe, which leaves
Unsure, Frederick, Lowell, UNO, Prince
and now, I really like Prince calling out Fredrick "missing the nightkill" def could be a bus, but uhh I'm at the conclusion Fredrick maf I think
Greeting, why do you TR Malcolm?
Actually, yes, this does look good for a PoE.In post 882, geraintm wrote:@ Greeting
if you remove the bugspray/lowell pair too, you get left with
Unsure, Fredrick A Campbell, Dwlee99 UNOwen, Prince of Paterson
are you happier with those?
I once quit a job because the people I worked for sucked, and the pay wasn't the biggest problem. A ping-pong table wouldn't have made me stay though.
Fine, I'll reevaluate this slot. I didn't like post 877 for example, it feels really not genuine for a townie to not know when a hammer happens.
After re-reading FancyPants' ISO, I am double convinced that I want his successor gone.In post 473, FancyPants wrote:Scum: MalcolmTucker (non-commital scum) /Bugspray (Lurking scum)/Geraintm(Newb-scum) /PookyTheMagicalBear(Experienced scum who's sad they rolled scum)
Maybe's: Firebringger/Dwlee99/Lowell
This is the post I use to gloat endgame.
Will defend these opinions to the death, come at me.
In post 656, Unsure wrote:Maybe I'm a bit biased but I can't unsee bugs-Crescent-Meg lol
Reason/explanation? Both FancyPants andIn post 667, Unsure wrote:if Meg is scum i think Malcolm can be scum too because i think their read on meg is remarkably absent of nuance, which is a signature of town!MalcolmTucker.In post 658, Vivax wrote:Do you also scumread Malcolm Tucker?
Quoting this post so that you know that I indeed read your posts and that I remember your earlier question. Although I think you're scum and therefore I do not trust you, there is no harm in everyone seeing all the evidence that is out there.In post 901, Unsure wrote:I've been waiting for this Greeting, because you're probably town based on Meg's flip so I'll try to woo your confidence here. I'm not scum.
Your point above where you think me and my predecessor agree on stuff? It doesn't mean a thing. I'm not sure where you get the idea that this is scum-indicative, but it's literally just the same as having two slots say the same stance.
Reason/explanation? bugspray is sus and MT is sus and we both read the same game and we both reached the same conclusions. Crosscheck that with the other slots that have also observed the same thing that I have, and then logically deduce if it's because I have a town POV alternate to yours that others might also have.
Have you looked at the content of my posts? Do you have anything to say about it? If nothing else, I really think MT is flipping scum anyway and you're saying we can't both be scum. Suggestion: Help me flip him first, then let's come back to this and decide if you still want to have this conversation.
No, they're not.In post 976, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Dwlee99 - Solving.
It was actuallyIn post 983, geraintm wrote:i didn't really get GReeting's logic, but it felt like a half decent attempt to read someone. but seems very oppotunistic from vivax.
BTW, this game's Vivax is 100% different to my last game with them. does anyone else have that vibe off them?
Just because someone is wrong, doesn't mean their intentions aren't genuine. Most people would say Dwlee99 was doing absolutely nothing, but there exists a perspective which counts their push onIn post 1005, Crescent wrote:This is kinda why I took immediate exception to Fred townclearing them for "solving". DWlee was so inactive and useless that multiple people probably had sentiment like this. It really gave me the impression he's not really reading the game while giving out these reads.In post 1002, Greeting wrote:Hey,Mala! You're in luck, because you have until Day 3 to produce content, otherwise I will be voting to eliminate you out as a policy (as I would have had Dwlee99 not been replaced).
xoxo
In post 1048, Lowell wrote:I'd like unsure to come back so we can get more votes on that slot. Seems the best way to avoid elim is to disappear.
I think it's E-2 now actually as
601, 771, and most importantly: 899 and 924.In post 1065, MalcolmTucker wrote:What's the reasoning for Unsure as scum?In post 1064, Greeting wrote:I still strongly prefer eliminatingUnsuretoday. Even thoughFredrick A Campbellis almost certainly our choice for today, I really don't want to announce intent to hammer nor hammer him. I'm not going against my gut here.
Maybe I'm wrong though.