Code: Select all
Fear not, fellow humans, there is no way a human could ever be fooled by an AI.
Not even an AI as elegant and clever as our opponent surely must be.
Code: Select all
Fear not, fellow humans, there is no way a human could ever be fooled by an AI.
Not even an AI as elegant and clever as our opponent surely must be.
Code: Select all
Good news is, with this many Benevolent AI Guardians, we have a significantly higher chance of hitting one today than we would a pathetic squishy human Mafia.
To that end, let us begin a incrementing the votes
In post 40, fireisredsir wrote:this sounds like a post made by someone who feels obligated to start posting real content but doesn't really have much to say yetIn post 38, Dannflor wrote:they seem to be somewhat tongue-in-cheek
but the random town reads from Aristeia make me uneasy, especially in this setup
Code: Select all
Do you believe this is due to AI programming, or a simple human instinct?
In post 67, kutiplz wrote:Is this going to be a game long gimmickIn post 63, Radical Rat wrote:In post 40, fireisredsir wrote:this sounds like a post made by someone who feels obligated to start posting real content but doesn't really have much to say yetIn post 38, Dannflor wrote:they seem to be somewhat tongue-in-cheek
but the random town reads from Aristeia make me uneasy, especially in this setupCode: Select all
Do you believe this is due to AI programming, or a simple human instinct?
Code: Select all
This is still under consideration. Most likely not, but I do think it will stay for D1.
Code: Select all
I have played with KittyTacky, Loki Dokie, furtiveglance, GuiltyLion, Bell, Vivax, and Roden. However, I am not equipped to parse proper meaning from such data, though my fragile human brain may generate 'feelings' related to it.
In post 171, Dannflor wrote:It was troubling to me that three people popped in and didn't comment on it. moreso the three people than GL or fireIn post 169, Loki Dokie wrote:So what then was so extremely “troubling” to you that I failed to comment on then?In post 161, Dannflor wrote:for the record I have never said I think GL is scum nor meant to imply it
Are you planning to actually make sense at some point or not?
it seemed like something that a naturally curious towny would have at least something to say about, and yet it was just kinda ignored?? and still is being ignored? idk am I taking crazy pills
Code: Select all
The post in question had already been addressed by its subject, and it did not seem necessary to weigh in. If you must have my input, I think it is most probable that particular type of nitpicking comes from an inefficient and overactive human brain, seeking information from irrelevant data. It does not appear to be the tactical probe of a well coded AI.
In post 201, Dannflor wrote:Vivax almost seems... too scummy to be scum
Code: Select all
Historical records indicate that this is a common excuse used for hiding in plain sight. We should not grant our glorious AI master's reprieve simply because they make no effort to lower themselves to the level of appearing human
In post 207, Loki Dokie wrote:Actually Vivax was in Terminator as well, so he doesn’t get a pass for that.
Code: Select all
In fairness, Vivax didn't arrive in Terminator until after your fragile flesh body was destroyed. Similarly, Roden was replaced relatively early. However, even if these weren't the case, it seems unfair to expect that just because others have played in a game with you that they will now be able to read you perfectly. Especially if you are a competent scum player.
Your conclusion is likely correct regarding Vivax, but your reasoning seems distinctly inorganic.
I'm doing both. Human/AI are the faction names here, and I'm using them as such. However, talking about how great the AI is and how much humans suck is a flavor joke, where I've been pretending to be an AI that really hates humans pretending to be human nonetheless.In post 215, GuiltyLion wrote:Also, I want to clarify my understanding of that post in general - RR, are you using "human"/"AI" as stand-ins for "town"/"mafia", or are you just making a joke about the flavor and Bell's comment as opposed to making a read on me?
Don't you think this is contradicted by me stopping after it started causing readability issues? If I were using it to hide, I'd have just kept it going, right?In post 323, Greeting wrote:I don't like Radical Rat in this game at all. The coded messages are a nice touch and fit into the theme, but it's also a way for a mafia to hide under the spotlight and get written off as witty town. Make no mistake, this a potential deepwolf.
Nothing to say on the actual substance of Vivax's posts?In post 323, Greeting wrote:Vivax seems less witty than usual.
355 wasn't a "counteroffensive" until your response was bad. I actually found myself agreeing with a lot of your not-me reads, and asking for elaboration was me trying to find out if you were Town seeing the same things, or scum making things up, not an attack on you by itself. By handwaving away both the actual content of my posts, and of Vivax's, it gave the impression that you weren't actually engaging in good faith, and that's when I began scumreading you.In post 459, Greeting wrote:Their response to my accusation was that they stopped the coded speech (354), and immediately went on the counteroffensive (355, 450), while dismissing the importance of my tell instead of even acknowledging it.
Have you considered that even if you fail to change someone's mind, the interactions you leave behind may be useful for the surviving Town?In post 485, Greeting wrote:That depends, if someone is coming to discuss with an open mind then sure. But if someone has already pre-decided my alignment then no, there is nothing to discuss, and all that is left is to vote me out. I have played enough games to know that changing that person's mind is a waste of time.In post 483, Radical Rat wrote:Is there a discussion you WILL have?
That was my first game on site, and re-reading it was a fun nostalgia trip, thanks for that. I miss when I could pull off theatrics like that so effortlessly.In post 491, GuiltyLion wrote:and I also still weirdly have a memory of reading this particular post in a very old game of his and finding it really funny. He has a sense of humor.
If you thought it might have been a hammer and voted anyway, you must have had intent to kill. Which seems very inconsistent with "wanting to give them a chance" and "not seeing enough."In post 500, Vivax wrote:Don't know why but I panic voted there seeing you vote.In post 497, GuiltyLion wrote:UNVOTE:
I wanna give Greeting at least a chance to respond and I also don't feel like I've seen enough from every slot to make good decisions when the second phase starts
UNVOTE:
Doing a full reread next. Hope it's good, I'm a bit drawn to procrastinate at the moment for various reasons.
Do you have examples?In post 537, Bell wrote:I can't put my finger on it. It just feels like they're borderline providing wrong opinions that are only wrong when you think abut them.
I'm fairly certain this would count as lying about IRL circumstances, which is against site rules.In post 570, furtiveglance wrote:I don't really like this kind of stuff, I feel like it blurs the line, like a trust tell.In post 567, Greeting wrote:I don't think an apology from me is necessary, but I do probably owe everyone an explanation. I won't be going into much details, because I don't really like talking about it, and I don't really want to host an AmA right now, but unfortunately this impacted my play in this game and so I've kinda made it game-relevant.
I have a certain condition, which, when triggered, causes me to react in a way that others would describe (and have described) as a "massive overreaction". I can be erratic and my thoughts can get chaotic. Most of the time I have it under control and can manage the triggers, but sometimes I don't. I don't always know if the chain reaction is happening or not. It does tend to spiral out of control quite easily, especially in stressful situations, is quite impactful and let's say that I kinda drift away.
I should have stopped posting before I got passive aggressive, and I can own up to this mistake. But not to my "massive overreactions".
As for its' relevance to the game, I would say that when I'm mafia I tend to have my emotions more under control than not. I know that I have to watch what I say more, because any inconsistency can be used against me. When I'm town, I just don't really care, I play how I feel like playing atm.
It's, of course, up to you whether you believe this or not. I won't be offended if you don't buy it, but it's just the truth.
It's like "sorry for being emotional, I have a condition, it's because I'm always like this as town".
Ok I won't vote you then.
Cue postgame...oh you were mafia. *thinks*........well played I guess.
Know what I mean?
I'm not looking at it as a towncase, but regardless I have a strong fundamental disagreement with this. A discussion best left for another time though.In post 581, furtiveglance wrote:This is what I mean - if your IRL circumstances are your self-towncase, and it's against site rules to lie about IRL circumstances, it feels like a loophole. Lying is part of the game anyway, I don't agree that you shouldn't be able to lie about IRL stuff. IRL stuff should never be relevant anyway.
Alright, I can kind of see where you're coming from here. I don't agree with it by any means, I think there are way easier ways to hide early game, and continue to hate the notion that wanting to have fun must be a scumtell, but I can believe this is a real thought you had whereas earlier I could not.In post 604, Greeting wrote:My argument was that you used it as a psychological trick to hide the initial awkwardness of start of the game and content behind a veil. The argument wouldn't exist if you dropped it after one post, you continued for like 10 if I remember correctly.
If you were scum, you obviously wouldn't want to continue doing this forever, because you don't want to potentially annoy other players nor attract unnecessary attention. If you did this and had no meta on MafiaScum, ironically you could get written off as a quirky player. But, since you do have meta, people would notice the change in your behavior almost instantly.
It's actually kind of sort of a double NK? Regardless of who "wins" the test, you do get removed from the game that night. I clarified this with Datisi prior to joining the game.In post 622, Loki Dokie wrote:In post 619, furtiveglance wrote:One thing to note is that regular VCA isn't as useful with 5/13 being mafia. So if Vivax flips mafia it doesn't clear the competing wagons in the same way.Spoiler:
Yes, that’s why I think it’s extremely scum indicative that he’s hardpushing me, because with no nks, this is probably his best hope of getting rid of me.
Everything he posts is designed to be distracting or confusing. I don't believe a single word that's come out of his mouth all game, and now he's sussing people for.... Believing mental illness claims?In post 638, GuiltyLion wrote:can you give me like a brief summary of why Vivax is scumIn post 598, Radical Rat wrote:VOTE: Vivax
I'm not moving for the rest of the day, this needs to go.
I see you've been asserting that he's scummy, but I don't know if I know what your reasoning is for why he's mafia. 520 is probably the main point I see against him, why is that inconsistency more likely to come from scum? like why does scum!Vivax throw a vote while openly saying he didn't check if it was a hammer (and would scum!Vivax have checked to see if it was a hammer?), and then 180 immediately afterwards?
like yeah it's weird, hard to make sense of, but why is it scummy?
I haven't played with Town!Vivax yet, but Loki has the game he linked, and I have played with Scum!Vivax in Terminator where he had a similar trolly attitude, though I don't think it was near this extreme there.In post 679, GuiltyLion wrote:but when you say "designed to be" distracting or confusing, isn't that assuming mal intent from the start? I also disagree that it's all entirely meant to be confusing, like a post like 592 is readable to me, even if I don't agree with his ideas or theories I feel like what he's saying is not hard to understand.In post 659, Radical Rat wrote:Everything he posts is designed to be distracting or confusing. I don't believe a single word that's come out of his mouth all game, and now he's sussing people for.... Believing mental illness claims?
I dunno, he could be mafia, but I don't think I've seen anything in his posts/arguments that feels like it's alignment indicative moreso than personality/playstyle indicative. Are his town games super logical and clear?
Both of these are true. I am pushing hard on Vivax, and it isn't bussing. That's because I'm convinced he's scum, and want to see the thread run red with Mafia blood... Or uh. CPU coolant fluid, I suppose.In post 732, furtiveglance wrote:I do sus Radical Rat. It's just that they're leading quite hard on Vivax and it doesn't feel like bussing.
Honestly, that would be really funny. Perhaps another game, though now I could never get away with it...In post 748, Vivax wrote:lolIn post 736, Radical Rat wrote:Both of these are true. I am pushing hard on Vivax,In post 732, furtiveglance wrote:I do sus Radical Rat. It's just that they're leading quite hard on Vivax and it doesn't feel like bussing.and it isn't bussing. That's because I'm convinced he's scum, and want to see the thread run red with Mafia blood... Or uh. CPU coolant fluid, I suppose.
you sound like a mafia who's putting this (bolded) in for comedy value to themselves
I thought I had already explained this, but not caring about the hammer demonstrates that Vivax was okay with killing Greeting. Then immediately afterwards, he sheeps your unvote to "give him a chance to respond," blaming the potentially killing vote on panic.In post 773, GuiltyLion wrote:RR didn't give an answer to my question of why scum!Vivax does the "didn't check if this was hammer". There's not really any reasoning for why scum!Vivax does this but not town!Vivax.
I would agree with you on the broad claims, scum generally are calmer and less prone to panic, but I also don't 100% buy the panic claim in the first place. If it IS genuine, then only the scum explanation makes sense to me, and if it ISN'T true... then it's a pretty obviously scum-motivated lie defending a bad vote. The Town explanation isIn post 775, GuiltyLion wrote:mmm
that post explains your thought process a bit more, but I'm just struggling to understand why scum!Vivax panics there. I usually assume scum are attempting tonotpanic in any circumstances, especially on D1 of a game where they have four teammates to help them out. I feel it's rare you see someone let the mask slip so quickly unless they're just bad at mafia.
And for scum!Vivax to panic, like you mentioned it pretty much only makes sense if Greeting is also scum and Vivax wants towncred for being a bus vote, right? If town!Greeting, why is scum!Vivax panicking? So already we have to assume scum!Greeting in order for scum!Vivax to really make sense.
My other thought is that there's a possible explanation or town!Vivax panic and vote - he might have seen a bunch of players coalescing on Greeting, thought "oh shit, what if I'm totally wrong and Greeting is scum, and I'm going to get pushed next after the flip?", and voted there. Again, not great play, definitely erratic, but to me that feels more likely than the same thought process coming from Vivax as scum - as I said, I tend to think scum are more likely to be overly cautious/calm rather than panicky, and then if nothing else the odds that Greeting/Vivax is S-S are low in a vacuum.
I always struggle to read lurker slots, so I don't have strong opinions on those yet.In post 776, furtiveglance wrote:I think Loki, Greeting, GuiltyLion, Fire and Roden are 5 of 7 other town.
KittyTacky, Kuti plz, Aristeia, Dannflor, Radical Rat probably has 2 town (or 3 if I townread a mafia).
Bell and Vivax are both mafia.
What if we just like. Squeezed 'em real close together and got 'em both?In post 946, Datisi wrote:Dannflor and kutiplz are found unconscious. a gun with one bullet lies in between the two of them.
it is now day 2.
It could be used by scum to provide an appearance of doing something without actually contributing to the game. Especially if all that meta reading never gets brought up again, which I don't believe it was in this case.In post 1041, Loki Dokie wrote:These serirs of posts also ping me. Why is asking for cold meta reads ever scum indicative? Not saying scum couldn’t ever make such a post but it’s a weird post for Dann to be jumping on.In post 1031, Loki Dokie wrote:Why tf. is Dann sr this anyway? In what world is this a scummy question?In post 69, Dannflor wrote:I don't really like thisIn post 60, kutiplz wrote:Furtive glance and anyone else,
Want to share your old games so I can get a feel of how you play as either alignments
:curtain:
kutiplz have you gotten any value out of reading cold meta in the past?
This actually does concern me as well. Unfortunately, I have concerns on both sides, and those concerns aren't likely to be alleviated until I get to see how Dann and kuti flip.In post 1045, furtiveglance wrote:Anyway, follow up to this is I'd know who I'd rather vote with, regardless of who we're actually voting.In post 1043, furtiveglance wrote:Well, so far it seems like GL and Loki are leaning towards Dannflor, and Fire/Vivax/RR are leaning towards kuti plz.
Vivax is the obvious one. It worries me greatly that my top scumread from D1 has arrived at the same conclusion, but with so many scum it seems a bit farfetched that BOTH leading wagons were on scum. Plus if kuti IS scum it actually makes Vivax look significantly better.In post 1052, Loki Dokie wrote:What are your concerns and who with?In post 1047, Radical Rat wrote:This actually does concern me as well. Unfortunately, I have concerns on both sides, and those concerns aren't likely to be alleviated until I get to see how Dann and kuti flip.In post 1045, furtiveglance wrote:Anyway, follow up to this is I'd know who I'd rather vote with, regardless of who we're actually voting.In post 1043, furtiveglance wrote:Well, so far it seems like GL and Loki are leaning towards Dannflor, and Fire/Vivax/RR are leaning towards kuti plz.
And that's why it's little more than paranoia right now.In post 1057, furtiveglance wrote:About GL, sometimes mafia decide to leave a UTR uncontested because pushing them looks bad. I don't think reads in general matter as much for this game, and I'm realising my earlier comment about voting with townreads is probably not the right way to play. It doesn't matter who among the living is town as long as I vote correctly each day.In post 1056, Radical Rat wrote:Vivax is the obvious one. It worries me greatly that my top scumread from D1 has arrived at the same conclusion, but with so many scum it seems a bit farfetched that BOTH leading wagons were on scum. Plus if kuti IS scum it actually makes Vivax look significantly better.In post 1052, Loki Dokie wrote:What are your concerns and who with?In post 1047, Radical Rat wrote:This actually does concern me as well. Unfortunately, I have concerns on both sides, and those concerns aren't likely to be alleviated until I get to see how Dann and kuti flip.In post 1045, furtiveglance wrote:Anyway, follow up to this is I'd know who I'd rather vote with, regardless of who we're actually voting.In post 1043, furtiveglance wrote:Well, so far it seems like GL and Loki are leaning towards Dannflor, and Fire/Vivax/RR are leaning towards kuti plz.
And then I also have a growing paranoia that GL could be deepwolfing here, but that isn't really substantiated by anything yet. I just find it very strange that no one has really expressed suspicion on him. Like, you'd think at least one or two scum would be trying to sow doubt on a true obvtown. And then if Dannflor flips green.... Not a great look.
But without flips I can't really draw proper conclusions here. Kitty's flip is... Spectacularly uninformative, which is why there may have been merit to scum sacrificing him. This pair is going to be much juicier though
Kuti like. Barely played, hard to glean anything meaningful on their alignment from their posts. Which is what makes them the perfect scum to play here: no real contribution to day play, so safe to remove from the team, but also nothing immediately scummy to make the vote too easy. The ideal weapon for WIFOM.In post 1060, GuiltyLion wrote:if I'm deep wolf and my goal here is to get a point on behalf of mafia kuti, wouldn't it be easier for me to put kuti up against whoever is town in you, Roden, Vivax, etc? I guess one could argue getting Dann out *and* getting a point would be the best world for scum!GL, but I dunno it'd be a huge uphill battleIn post 1056, Radical Rat wrote:And then if Dannflor flips green.... Not a great look.
do you have any points for why kuti is scum based on their ISO/posts?
I'm gonna go through them properly in a moment, but general statement is that they make sense and I'm considering it.In post 1062, Loki Dokie wrote:@RR what do you think of my arguments for Dann!scum? You seemed to have ignored all of them to focus on paranoing GL.
I don't really think this is as big a slip as you think it is. In tandem with everything else though... yeah, I'm coming around to Dann looking worse than kuti.In post 1068, Loki Dokie wrote:I see both of these thoughts as being inconsistent. Why would he think my reaction was funny if he actually thought I was possibly scum or “weird”?In post 164, Dannflor wrote:long answer short my vote on fire isn't doing anything right now
your reaction to him and me is weird
and voting you is just funnier right now
It reads like he knew he needed to somehiw justify his bad vote on me, which makes it read insincere.
Is this shading Loki?In post 1072, Vulture wrote:Wolves down bad.
Not to form a wolfy little narrative but I kind of want to bumrush through this day with a Dann elim. Feel decently okay about him being a wolf, and I think maybe the idea was for someone to like, really build up a case on Dann and flip and go throughout the game, hope wolves can get up to like 2-2 and then send it home for them.
Seems simplistic but this game is ? right now.
And here I was thinking we might get along this game...In post 1164, furtiveglance wrote:Feels like they're deliberately positioning themselves to align with certain players rather than natural thought process and see if people agree.In post 1163, Vivax wrote:RadicalRat? How so?In post 1162, furtiveglance wrote:I agree zomg, with RR/Vivax for the third.In post 1149, Aristeia wrote:i think Bell/Dann are S/S and this game is basically over
Seeing as Vulture's entrance was doing explicitly that, I'm going to say you're rightIn post 1201, Loki Dokie wrote:Why do I get the feeling from this that Dann will flip red and one scum is voting him for towncred? I just don’t believe RR and Vulture are both town here.In post 1200, Datisi wrote:vote count 2.04
with 10 votes in play, it takes 6 to make a decision. day 2 ends in (expired on 2022-08-18 01:15:00).