my first townread is this kitty person.
this has nothing to do with my love of cats I promise.
Hi Fire I promise I will not mindlessly tunnel you again <3
it never works out ! :<In post 25, fireisredsir wrote:his invite dm said that he liked me, i was kinda nglIn post 14, Aristeia wrote:I joined this game just to flirt with the cute moderator and because he invited me.
im gonna frame it and put it on my wall
why aren't you going to mindlessly tunnel me this time? did you finally roll maf?
Pressure is useful for determining alignment
I wouldn't pressure anyone I'm townreading or someone who is unlikely to be sortable via pressureIn post 284, furtiveglance wrote:Is there a player you wouldn't vote for pressure or do you just not care?In post 282, Aristeia wrote:Pressure is useful for determining alignment
The answer would be the same.In post 286, furtiveglance wrote:I think you know I meant specific players in this game.
coolIn post 292, furtiveglance wrote:Do you think giving me less to read you will make me town/null you?In post 291, Aristeia wrote:I generally prefer to do things rather than not do things
It doesn't, you just go in the 'could be mafia' group.
In post 299, furtiveglance wrote:Do you care about getting voted out, or losing? Why do you play?In post 298, Aristeia wrote:I'm sorry I don't really care what people read me as.
it might be a character flaw
I play for fun, and I like surviving and winning, it hurts to get voted out and lose.
In post 352, Roden wrote:Posting just to say I'm not lurking, I've been dealing with a crisis with a friend and I'm more focused on that atm. I'll respond to stuff later tonight.
In post 367, Roden wrote:What game were we both in where I was scum? Or is that just a general read?
I don't understand how you can sus the loki voters and also be null on rodenIn post 373, KittyTacky wrote:Yeah same. Roden is very null to me.In post 251, Radical Rat wrote:I don't understand the Roden wagon. He's got three posts, and none of them strike me as particularly scummy.
In post 429, Greeting wrote:Loki Dokie, you are creating artificial and unnecessary pressure for aRodenwagon. It's true that his ISO isn't very towny, but this is not obvscum. If you're town, then take a step back and let him explain himself.
In post 548, KittyTacky wrote:I'm not heavily scumreading the Loki voters. And explain how is it a contradiction?In post 375, Aristeia wrote:I don't understand how you can sus the loki voters and also be null on rodenIn post 373, KittyTacky wrote:Yeah same. Roden is very null to me.In post 251, Radical Rat wrote:I don't understand the Roden wagon. He's got three posts, and none of them strike me as particularly scummy.
this feels like a contradiction to me.
The ones who actually gave content so far. I can't read someone who made so few posts at all regardless of if they made a naked vote or not.
so you're doing this as mafia now?In post 631, KittyTacky wrote:I do this as town tho.In post 577, Aristeia wrote:
He is shading without specificity - which tends to be scum going through the motions rather than actually thinking about who is mafia
I have trouble believing you actually scumread Dannflor because you have done literally nothing to push or sort him.In post 630, KittyTacky wrote:Don't like Dannflor, mostly.
I have not said anything about Dannflor's alignment.In post 648, Vivax wrote:I don't like this angle. It seems you are accusing someone of not pushing Dannflor, but you don't seem focused enough on Dannflor yourself. You should think he's mafia if you think that it's a valid reason to attack KittyTacky. Cue for TMI and the Ari/Dann pair being correct.In post 635, Aristeia wrote:I have trouble believing you actually scumread Dannflor because you have done literally nothing to push or sort him.In post 630, KittyTacky wrote:Don't like Dannflor, mostly.
In post 661, Aristeia wrote:in fact its wholly irrelevant to what I think of Kittys alignment!
atp in time the only people who had voted for Loki Dokie are Dannflor and Fireisredsir, fire had unvoted at this point.In post 186, KittyTacky wrote:I don't like the naked votes on Lokie Dokie.
which is incongruent with:In post 369, KittyTacky wrote:I will repeat that the string of naked votes on Loki is just HMMMMMMM to me.
In post 373, KittyTacky wrote:Yeah same. Roden is very null to me.In post 251, Radical Rat wrote:I don't understand the Roden wagon. He's got three posts, and none of them strike me as particularly scummy.
In post 548, KittyTacky wrote:The ones who actually gave content so far. I can't read someone who made so few posts at all regardless of if they made a naked vote or not.
In post 630, KittyTacky wrote:Don't like Dannflor, mostly.In post 553, Aristeia wrote:In post 548, KittyTacky wrote:I'm not heavily scumreading the Loki voters. And explain how is it a contradiction?In post 375, Aristeia wrote:I don't understand how you can sus the loki voters and also be null on rodenIn post 373, KittyTacky wrote:Yeah same. Roden is very null to me.In post 251, Radical Rat wrote:I don't understand the Roden wagon. He's got three posts, and none of them strike me as particularly scummy.
this feels like a contradiction to me.
The ones who actually gave content so far. I can't read someone who made so few posts at all regardless of if they made a naked vote or not.
name names
In post 552, KittyTacky wrote:Did a reread of the whole game so far, yeah I can sheep this.In post 450, Radical Rat wrote:Dear God, this whole "I don't get scumread" thing is insufferable.
I don't think it's necessarily scummy, because the same thing happened somewhat in Terminator, but it IS obnoxious and makes the game way harder to follow for anyone else.
Anyway,
VOTE: Greeting
Ignoring the actual substance of posts in favor of superficial "tells" is probably as scummy as it's gonna get D1.
VOTE: Greeting
668
547In post 728, Roden wrote:Also what caused you to join the first Done/Greeting wagon but avoid the second one?