<3 Missed you friendIn post 18, Something_Smart wrote:VOTE: Frozen Angel long time no see!Okay, that's good.In post 17, fireisredsir wrote:-
VOTE: Something_Smart
<3 Missed you friendIn post 18, Something_Smart wrote:VOTE: Frozen Angel long time no see!Okay, that's good.In post 17, fireisredsir wrote:-
You faked you're in a neighborhood?In post 64, Charloux wrote:I was just messing with him?In post 61, catboi wrote:Would appreciate an answer to this!In post 47, Marashu wrote:I've posted in the ThunderClan PT. I don't see your post in there. Double-check that you posted in the right PT?In post 42, Charloux wrote:Task failed successfully i guess?In post 43, Bell wrote:My goal is to get eliminated within the first page for having a dog avatar.
Am i the only one in the thunderclan, nobody posted anything yet apart from me?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Charloux
so you faked you posted in the neighborhood at start to mess with people head who can see you didn't post there? That kinda makes no senseCharloux wrote:I don't understand what the problem is. I saw him being the only one to post in the pt and was like "Is there anybody in the thread" to have fun.
Was going to keep playing dumb but i guess it's better not?
He could have posted there at start of phase and didn't check it again assuming it was the neighborhood pt? and then slip up at post 40 and /back track on it fast againIn post 80, catboi wrote:That would imply no one else posted in the scum PT though which seems incredibly unlikely?In post 79, Frozen Angel wrote:so you faked you posted in the neighborhood at start to mess with people head who can see you didn't post there? That kinda makes no senseCharloux wrote:I don't understand what the problem is. I saw him being the only one to post in the pt and was like "Is there anybody in the thread" to have fun.
Was going to keep playing dumb but i guess it's better not?
More likely that you confused PTs and posted elsewhere first instead and then started acting like you were messing with people in some way when called out?
VOTE: Charloux
Maybe the issue is that I don't understand what was fun about the lie you said in the main thread?In post 85, Charloux wrote:Why is me confusing pt more likely than me deliberately having fun over someone being alone for an hour?
shots fired but okiIn post 87, Charloux wrote:Sorry you have no sense of humor
Hi my shirrroooooooooooooooooooooooooo <3In post 92, Shiro wrote:I mean assuming he was scum I doubt he would answer that honestly FAIn post 65, Frozen Angel wrote:bell you meantioned you derp on setups regularly as town
would you say you're self aware enough to fake this as scum potentially
ALSO HI EVERYONE IT HAS BEEN A WHILE
So you think I'm pushing him for a fabricated read based on this, yet you didn't vote me. Is there a reason for that?In post 112, Datisi wrote:i think what she called as "makes no sense" actually makes complete senseIn post 103, Something_Smart wrote:What part is over-explanation? All of her explanation is in response to direct questions.In post 99, Datisi wrote:i think frozen angel is scummy for trying to over-explain her vote on charloux
if she actually thought about the second part of the post 79, she would come to the conclusion that that implies nobody posted in the scum pt, which like. really REALLY isn't likely.
this is what i mean by over-explainy - she presented a reasonable explanation, dismissed it as "doesn't make sense" (even though it does), and then proceeded to try to justify her vote and appear like she's Really Thinking About The Game
even though she's not (because if she was, she'd realize that nobody posting in the scum pt is unlikely)
why? it felt like you do have a solid case against me yet you said nothing about your other vote?In post 115, Datisi wrote:yes, i wanna keep voting norwee
I see you remember my reaction testing and behavioral pattern analysis styleIn post 129, Something_Smart wrote:FA is the type to deliberately push phony reasoning like that but of course, my meta is stale
well, that was just my assumption cause that was how all neighborhood chats were, and no access to even see those threads were given till the game started.In post 131, Cephrir wrote:i am townreading frozen angel for calling a case against herself solid in the process of questioning someone else
re: charloux: the case where i might find this compelling is one where the scum chat was not open until game start (possible because the neighbor PTs weren't) but there is no way to know this probably
yeah, ... what?In post 149, Marashu wrote:It was mainly snark and confusion on my end; I did think that it might be a PT slip but figured that scum would be more careful. I hadn't considered whether or not the scum PT would be open during pre-game.I was too busy trying to figure out if I was misreading the title of the Clan PT.
In post 153, Val89 wrote:I'm not sure I buy bell's explanation, and I'm also reading an twinge of complaint in SS's 31 regarding the mod having potentially screwed over dark forest - and I don't understand why there would be "a hard time parsing this from any alignment." If you are Starclan, there is no need for a sample PM, because the sample PM is sitting in your inbox, no?
Nobody else seems to have had any trouble, and, while yes, I can see how being simultaneously a member of Starclan + a neighbourhood clan might be a source of potential confusion; I am wondering how it is possible to confirm in reply to the role PM ones "role and alignment" whilst that confusion remains. Surely you sort that out there and then while confirming?
What am I missing?
Thats an interesting question actuallyIn post 154, Something_Smart wrote:I don't want to talk about the wording my role PM if said wording is not public knowledge.In post 153, Val89 wrote:If you are Starclan, there is no need for a sample PM, because the sample PM is sitting in your inbox, no?
Why would you share that detail in main thread?In post 161, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:OUR LEADER (CHARLOUX) SEEMS ALIGNED WITH STARCLAN BECAUSE OF THEIR POSTS IN OUR CLAN PT
I liked this reactionIn post 204, Charloux wrote:STOP.GIVING.INFO.WHEN.WE.DONT.KNOW.MAJORITY.OF.SETUP.In post 199, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:SHARP PENGUIN. DO YOU WANT TO VOTE SOMEONE IN OUR CLAN TODAY?In post 193, PenguinPower wrote:But, Dr Worm wasn’t a really doctor. So you’re not really scrrrd.
VOTE: SCRRRRBEAR
where did this suddenly come from. also titus can be scum or town regardless of that hypothesis so its kinda weird to tie those things togetherIn post 251, Cephrir wrote:Anyone who thinks there is exactly 1 scum in each neighborhood should mathematically be voting Titus.
Do we all agree that is a stupid assumption now? Great!
I cant follow any part of this interaction over third read right now and its annoying me. there are absolutely no intel to make assumptions about how scum are distributed along the clans or out of it (unless if you have an intel to share with specifics) and any kind of speculations can actually lead to more fallacies than logic.In post 260, Charloux wrote:Assuming i have 200 IQ and can put the pieces together as soon as they come.In post 250, Titus wrote:@Dann,In post 230, Charloux wrote:I wish what happened in my hood stayed in my hood...
So 4 clans, 5 scum. My current theory is that scum are in 3 clans, and preventing them from knowing who the strays are is the key to this game.
That means no saying who the clan members are and no saying who the leaders are.
Let's break this down.
Arbitrary assumption regarding scum being left out. Neon sign of scum being left out of a clan.
Lack of telling me to shut up when I announced I was a stray + lack of objection with many hood claims already suggests no urgency to deny scum essential information from their alleged pov.
There was a total lack of pushback on my belief that I was the sole stray.
It's not enough to cry slip, but it's close.
Spoiler: I don't have 200IQ
The other leaders should be able to piece together why i made that theory.
did we just came back to MS together?!In post 263, Alisae wrote:nah. I only started playing again after my 1 year vacation from site was lifted. The I easier way to describe just what it is I feel when I read that ISO + hood activity is that guy is actually not even trying to form reads.In post 262, fireisredsir wrote:have you played with val before? he seems p on brand so far based on what ive seen from him in previous games
Please don't do thatIn post 284, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don’t want to believe Alisae is scum becauve they’ve been so helpful to me and seemed genuinely trying to solve me.
umm?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!In post 297, Mistyx wrote:we have 5 so i think yours are just missing people so far
(me / bell / penguin / fire / ceph)
In post 302, fireisredsir wrote:they are both ice-related
I'm also queen shifty so I guess it's confirmed we're the same personIn post 303, PenguinPower wrote:
sure but how you concluded they areIn post 318, catboi wrote:This has the potential to be a really dumb read but Norwee seems relaxed, which I think is townie? He seemed pretty stressed out when he left the site and I think if he drew scum he'd be feeling a lot of anxeity but the way he's posting just feels like he's self-assured of his own innocence. Does remind me a bit of how he was playing in the game where I tried to shitpush him as scum.
I need you to elaborate this one for meIn post 323, catboi wrote:something_smart prob town, btw.
Datisi is maybe a little too self aware about the reads on his slotsIn post 370, Datisi wrote:can you talk about this a bit moreIn post 335, Bell wrote:But I just scum read Datisi because their approach aligns with what I think of as their scum game.
Oh my that is a bit of a hard 180 for datisi over that vote. trying to fabricate a scum read on the slot to seem like they are solving the slot is a theory getting more likely in my head.In post 372, Datisi wrote:shit fuck i need to start getting ready for class, fuck page 15 i guess
alisae vibes townie because they kinda feel honest in their approach to the game and i also completely understand the annoyance with val because god knows i've been there
also now i think norwee is townie bc i'm kinda lowkey sheeping alisae on that and also if he's posting in hood, that makes sense why he's kinda underwhelming
unrelated to those two, scrrdbear is town
everything in me is screaming that val is scum but have been wrong before
@penguin, why did you vote 2nd leading wagon instead leading wagon (are you a competing wagons kinda penguin, i forget)
VOTE: charloux - 363
That is a bit crumblingIn post 386, Datisi wrote:i don't want to vote val rn because i have been wrong before so i want to give more time to sit on that, and i don't think voting him will help me solve him (as it will with charloux)
would you mind sharing those off vibes in detailsIn post 407, NorwegianboyEE wrote:VOTE: Charloux
I think there’s been major off vibes from this slot. They’ve been involved in multiple shifty scenarios now and their responses always pinged me as weird.
why would you have mastina and Shiidaji on town core and why do you scumread norwee? and you feel like them talking about the number of scum in different clans (which I tell is baseless from my intel) makes Charloux more town for some reason? and enough to put him in town core?In post 416, Something_Smart wrote:UNVOTE: CharlouxThis post seems pretty town. Generally I see scum being too afraid to vaguely reference their role like this, because it requires planning out a specific fakeclaim and committing to it. (And it's pretty hard to retroactively come up with a fakeclaim that matches a soft like this.)In post 236, Charloux wrote:It's a theory based on Titus claim, the number of people in my pt and the details of my role.
3 more people have yet to post, and we can't confirm that everybody who posted is a member of a clan.
I think my top vote choice would be Mistyx but I'll make some modicum of an effort to consolidate votes and join mastina on Norwee.
VOTE: Norwee
For now I'm feeling okay with a towncore of {Charloux, mastina, Marashu, Val, Shiidaji} + perhaps Bear (I will have to reread their posts, and I had enough trouble reading them the first time).
It's probably kind of a problem that the people I'm most inclined to townread are often the people I clash the most with, and the ones I'm the most paranoid of are the ones I love talking to and solving with.
I think its best if you stop posting like this with the 200 cap on total posts. would hate to see players muted mid day over them posting random comments.In post 429, Bell wrote:Cephism spotted.In post 425, Cephrir wrote:Why must people who claim mason in their first post get mason roles instead of me. The world is so unfair.In post 395, mastina wrote:Hi I am a mason.
+1 to Bell’s irritation.
Are you a relatively new player? (this is not me understimating newer players - just asking if you're familiar with the game concepts deeply or not)In post 431, NorwegianboyEE wrote:My goal is to flip mafia.In post 417, Charloux wrote:Mistyx, Datisi, Norweigan; What is even your goal with my wagon? Do you want me to explain my thought process for yesterday? Claim all my role details?
Explain my theory in detail? Do you want to get me to L-1 and act shocked when someone hammers?
This post is absolutely triggering. You and I both know that there is nothing clearing clan leaders in any way and leaders can be town or mafia too. so to use it to get town cred is absolutely gross.In post 436, Charloux wrote:Unless you know something about the setup that i, as town clan leader don't, you have 0 reason for me to be your main target of scum flipping attempt.In post 431, NorwegianboyEE wrote:My goal is to flip mafia.In post 417, Charloux wrote:Mistyx, Datisi, Norweigan; What is even your goal with my wagon? Do you want me to explain my thought process for yesterday? Claim all my role details?
Explain my theory in detail? Do you want to get me to L-1 and act shocked when someone hammers?
If you mean Charloux I'm kinda getting the vibe that they did that as well because they are mafia.In post 503, Cephrir wrote:i was catching up and saw someone using the hoods as categories to hunt in which is a pet peeve of mine
It was though. I give norwee that. Joke is supposed to be funny right?In post 445, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:WHY?In post 440, NorwegianboyEE wrote:"Sorry you don't have a sense of humor" was especially iffy response.
The part of role Charloux claimed is known to a group of players already and the same role is shared by those players. Its not like he dropped a claim that can be countered. what he dropped was absolutely nothing related to that role + some misleading information/inferences and then trying to use that claim directly for town cred.In post 448, Val89 wrote:I find Dannflor's point regarding Charloux in 384 to be persuasive - and to a lesser degree Something_smarts point about the reference to having some sort of role in 416 - and find myself agreeing with the townreads on Charloux. I don't think that is the right place for a wagon either.
I don't see anything that particularly pings me about Marashu from what is evident in this thread. Anyone from Thunder able to give me a TLDR on what's happening in there to want to wagon Marashu, or point me to it if it's already been given and I've missed it?
Are you regretting it truly though? cause I saw no remorse in you trying to show it off as a town clear by misrepresenting itIn post 462, Charloux wrote:I shared my role and what it does(Regretting it deeply now), then we had a bit of a discussion.In post 448, Val89 wrote: I don't see anything that particularly pings me about Marashu from what is evident in this thread. Anyone from Thunder able to give me a TLDR on what's happening in there to want to wagon Marashu, or point me to it if it's already been given and I've missed it?
After this Bear came, shared a lot of reads. Marashu also had some reads.
The last thing i commented is that i don't see a point in talking in the pt since bear will just say everything in the main thread, so i might as well skip that step and post directly.
The thing on Marashu is bear trying to clean the thunder pt from scum.
I don't like this unvote as much as I didn't like the vote itself. The backtrack sounds so shallowIn post 476, Datisi wrote:on the topic of charloux - meh. i am *fine* with that answer, i vaguely remember agreeing with some stuff some said about him being town, and i don't wanna push on mech early anyway. so.
UNVOTE:
cause I cant see the way you got there naturally.In post 505, Datisi wrote:why do you think that is fabricated?In post 504, Frozen Angel wrote:Oh my that is a bit of a hard 180 for datisi over that vote. trying to fabricate a scum read on the slot to seem like they are solving the slot is a theory getting more likely in my head.
(also, there is something really funny to me about fa accusing me of being too aware of the reads on me, while bear is accusing me of not sorting people enough via their reads on me. damned if you do...)
we all are outed to each other anyway. so there is nothing coy about it at all. and its certainly not making any of us more or less town/mafia. if anything I lean on at least facing one mafia leader based on the mechanics involved but I bet it had randomness too.In post 514, Cephrir wrote:whatever this clan leader thing is, at least 2 and i bet 3 of you are outed so maybe there's not any point in playing coy about it
why are you explaining the mechanics of our role (partially) in public or pushing me to do so by asking redundant/irrelevant questions?In post 517, Charloux wrote:@FA
1)What can leaders do with their role?
2)Who knows who gets the warrior promotion?
3)How does town prevent them from getting killed on the same night?
Once you can answer these questions it will become apparent why voting for a leader amongst everybody on D1 is a terrible idea.
and a protection mechanic (that we hypothetically might have or have not) will make either of us clear? It just make him more scummy for going out load about how confirmed town he is for being a leader while we both know the role has nothing to do with alignmentIn post 521, Cephrir wrote:charloux does kind of have a point though there has to be some mechanism to prevent scum from just shooting the leader target (i am making some leaps here because i think i have guessed how the mechanic works)
maybe the leaders already know what that is
its complicatedIn post 528, Cephrir wrote:oh, you don't know each other? wow, then we really should not be outing the remaining ones imo
that's exactly why I think it has to be called out to people who cant see full imageIn post 530, Dannflor wrote:I see why Charloux is thinking the way he is and I think it's towny but I wouldn't put any stock in it. I think making an assumption like that is going to be about as useful as assuming there's exactly one scum in each neighborhood.
read my posts in last pageIn post 534, Alisae wrote:y r u voting datisiIn post 533, Frozen Angel wrote:that's exactly why I think it has to be called out to people who cant see full imageIn post 530, Dannflor wrote:I see why Charloux is thinking the way he is and I think it's towny but I wouldn't put any stock in it. I think making an assumption like that is going to be about as useful as assuming there's exactly one scum in each neighborhood.
anyways
VOTE: Datisi
I can't believe I managed to catch up and even chat in real time tonight. see u all later
I should be in bed but I am not so I answer. the back track specially felt unnatural. the vote felt a sudden stance change and felt fabricated. the whole agenda seems with extra intentions - I mean with another intention than solving because you cant see how he gets there. a wagon is formed he is against it and pushes hard against it and then suddenly finds a very small excuse and jumps on the wagon himself and before anything deep or meaningful happens jumps off it for no reason.In post 542, Alisae wrote:I get your concerns but can't town do that stuff as well?
Well for Its not about basic progressions. It's about mindset disconnection. you say you believe A and in the process of game you suddenly decide to be anti A. when its not scum motivated on its own, it gives opportunistic vibes all over.In post 549, Datisi wrote:i hate to bring up this pointIn post 544, Frozen Angel wrote:I should be in bed but I am not so I answer. the back track specially felt unnatural. the vote felt a sudden stance change and felt fabricated. the whole agenda seems with extra intentions - I mean with another intention than solving because you cant see how he gets there. a wagon is formed he is against it and pushes hard against it and then suddenly finds a very small excuse and jumps on the wagon himself and before anything deep or meaningful happens jumps off it for no reason.In post 542, Alisae wrote:I get your concerns but can't town do that stuff as well?
so I'm concerned for the progress he made with his mindset and I think its worth investigating
actually no i don't
do you think i don't know how to fake basic progressions as scum?
You're completely changing what I said here in a very weird way actually.In post 550, Datisi wrote:like, "can't see how i got there" is a very dumb point because it's very obvious how i got there and i in fact spelled it out prior to voting charloux
> find norwee sus (ftr, he was feeling underwhelming)
> alisae offers an explanation why norwee is sus that i can vibe with
> wanna vote someone else
> the only suspicion i have on someone currently (that i feel will be beneficial by me voting there) is charloux, as i could see clear scum-motivation in voting bear there and his thoughts didn't make sense internally
> time passes, he explains more stuff about mech, admits the vote was a tilt vote, okay yeh i can buy that, i don't find him scummy anymore, unvote
like literally nothing about this is difficult to understand, you can claim you don't *buy* my progression if you want, but framing as if i didn't explain it is lol
also like, your points about me pushing against the wagon, then voting there, then unvoting - you obviously find that scummy. WHY is that scummy? what is the scum motivation behind doing that? obviously an answer is "fake solving", but you're framing it as if there's something *more* there and i don't get it
for the record - in a different game i'd probably be voting fa right now because i think her push on me stinks by far the most than what anyone else has done this game. but i have had a few people say she is Just Like That sometimes. so i'd like those people to chime in and say what they think here. thanks.
to sound vocal, lead, blend in and gain support. You need to change vote and drop it on a hot target, even if it was the one you were vocaly in support of and against wagoning earlier so you made the 180.In post 551, Datisi wrote:what is my agenda here. or was, i guess.In post 544, Frozen Angel wrote:the whole agenda seems with extra intentions
in general people need to stop calling my reasoning "wrong" if they don't wanna spend time to decipher and analyze what I say and think the way I'm suggesting when reading my reasons as it's not the traditional scum huntingIn post 557, fireisredsir wrote:in my previous game with FA i felt like she was kinda right for the wrong reasons a lot, or at least her reasons were explained in a messy wayIn post 550, Datisi wrote:for the record - in a different game i'd probably be voting fa right now because i think her push on me stinks by far the most than what anyone else has done this game. but i have had a few people say she is Just Like That sometimes. so i'd like those people to chime in and say what they think here. thanks.
like i argued with her logic the whole game bc i felt it was wrong but then her reads ended up being correct
in this case i would say that i agree with her that your progression there feels a little off, but i thought it was more on the side of overexplained/overtelegraphed rather than underexplained
and like your defense after jumping on that with like "actually it was explained perfectly already here let me show you" does kinda fit with that so
Thanks. yeap thatIn post 558, fireisredsir wrote:like going from 363, asking him a question and implying you find him suspicious for his actions, to 372 where you vote and reference that prior post, to 469 where you say "i already spelled out exactly why i voted you and what i want from you", to 476 where you think his answer is fine and back off
it just kinda feels like you had the whole trajectory planned in advance?
what exactly did you see in 472 that changed your mind? and throwing in the comments in 476 about agreeing with stuff others said about him being town and that you don't want to push a mech point just feels kinda weird bc why did that only now come into play? its like overexplained. idk why you felt the need to bring that stuff up, bc if it was important to your read, then why didn't it matter earlier?
so you yourself believe you made excuses to push that slot, but now you're basically saying there were no other strong leads to pursue there and you went there to make sure the vote is active and put pressure on slot (by 90%) yet you were alarmed when I said I think that the vote was not legit and based on your true read. why?In post 564, Datisi wrote:60% pressure,10% legit vote, 30% not wanting to vote norwee anymore but not liking when my vote isn't active
In post 577, mastina wrote:Shiro town by proxy of Norwee and Alisae being scum and therefore unlikely to have three scum in one clan.
so you're being sarcastic or... and if yes why you vote. huh?In post 583, Bell wrote:Oh. I’m fine killing norwe if mastina is 97.5% certain they’re scum.
VOTE: Norwe
yeah fire is actively analysing things and saying stuff out of my mouth as I'm catching up consistently. feeling goodIn post 589, fireisredsir wrote:why does this feel sarcastic im confusedIn post 583, Bell wrote:Oh. I’m fine killing norwe if mastina is 97.5% certain they’re scum.
VOTE: Norwe
this post was absolutely unnecessary. If it was genuine from them, you're just trying to annoy them and if not, you're not analysing it and instead making it even more dramatic in a sense. Dealing with ATE demands a clear heard not more wood in the fire and I find it impulsive in a senseIn post 601, Mistyx wrote:i'm not really sure what you're intending to accomplish with this beyond dragging the thread mood downIn post 598, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Every game lately is like this. I try play in a way that makes me have fun and also can solve at the same time. But i always end up feeling annoyed. I didn’t even really want to sign up to this in the first place. But now i’m here and just as expected i’m first wagon. All i can do is grit my teeth and bear it. I don’t even know why i manage to continue despite feeling miserable. It’s some kind of strange stubborness that never let’s up.
This post is wierding me out talking about how wagons can off someone and numbers and all that. why not focusing on the votes and reasonings and instead on the ability of players to rally others against another player?In post 608, Alisae wrote:Bell voted Norwee because mastina told Bell they have like some made up number of what, 98.something% that's wrong? From what I read it doesn't look like the read itself influenced Bell but rather mastina's confidence.In post 604, Mistyx wrote:didnt bell vote norwee explicitly because of mastina's read? i don't think this is necessarily trueIn post 602, Alisae wrote:It's not like people are going to let mastina influence their actions or read her posts.
When I think of the read influencing someone reading, I think of how Kitty voted Norwee, whom literally said that the case, aka the explanation of the read, caused them to vote Norwee.
But I mean ya at the end of the day they did influence 2 people to vote but when she is going to need to rally a total of 11 villagers if she wants to vote out a scum!Norwee that is aligned with me. 3 out of 2, kinda small, ngl.
Now, that's not taking into consideration what our alignment ACTUALLY is. Maybe mastina will get her wagon because scum will seize the moment to try to get a town!norwee killed. In a way that's less villagers required for her to kill a villager, so that makes her attempt at killing Norwee easier ig.
I feel honesty here and it explains the impulsiveness I mentioned earlierIn post 609, Mistyx wrote:i've had bad experiences with high emotion over stuff like this and i didn't want a repeat
maybe i could've phrased it better but i'm tired sue me
I don't think this is a fake progression, so at the very least makes me wanna listen to their norwee read, even if it might be from a scum in defense of a town who made ATE. but I lean town there tooIn post 617, catboi wrote:I don't know the thing is I've played a bunch with norwee so I don't necessarily expect deep reasoning from him, at least early on. I have almost definitely mis-elimmed him for reasons similar to this.In post 615, Mistyx wrote:i would argue that actually makes it worse? norwee's reasoning feels really thin to me - it's there but it doesn't really feel like it was a genuine thought and not just an after the fact justification, and i feel like scum would go to more effort to at least look like there's some solving happening
so i think a follow with thin reasoning is worse than one without reasoning
why no comment about the active population?In post 628, Something_Smart wrote:Has Shiro done anything in the PT?
the fos seems too vanilla and opportunistic and then on same post made jump on char wagon when they saw the titus vote for some reason? if you think it was a scum slip then you would vote right at start what was about the titus vote significant there?In post 394, KittyTacky wrote:The Charloux slip case makes sense so far but I'll keep reading. FOS: Charloux
that makes more sense now.In post 1044, Alisae wrote:Partially because I'm demonstrating what a scum thought process from me would look like?In post 1036, Frozen Angel wrote:This post is wierding me out talking about how wagons can off someone and numbers and all that. why not focusing on the votes and reasonings and instead on the ability of players to rally others against another player?
-Bell's "reasoning" for voting Norwee is that mastina had a 97.something% read. It looked like the reasoning for the vote was that they were rallied by mastina. That is the reasoning at the time.
-Kitty's "reasoning" for voting Norwee was they supposedly looked at mastina's case and went "yep, this is what I want to do." They were rallied by mastina. That is the reasoning at the time.
FA the quote chain is a line that was snipped out of context.It probably reads weirdly because the post was written about me speculating about what me and norwee would do as scum.In post 602, Alisae wrote:If we were scum together I would probably just tell Norwee in a private topic to just not engage, just makes more sense not to. It's not like people are going to let mastina influence their actions or read her posts. Engaging doesn't do anything, if anything, probably makes mastina look more credible, and wastes posts.
I'm saying that maybe mastina's Norwee push is the kind of thing I feel like scum would jump to like dogs to a bone and that's what ended up happening with the 2 players I mentioned? I'm basically saying that's what is happening if she is town. Mastina is the best flip in the game from my pov.
who denied it was legit?In post 1045, Datisi wrote:because it still was in part a legit read and denying that as being legit is incorrect?In post 1035, Frozen Angel wrote:so you yourself believe you made excuses to push that slot, but now you're basically saying there were no other strong leads to pursue there and you went there to make sure the vote is active and put pressure on slot (by 90%) yet you were alarmed when I said I think that the vote was not legit and based on your true read. why?
also s_s said he knows you, but he said it in the hood so
why you think she is faking her reads?In post 1050, Alisae wrote:It is and it is something that is potentially happening in this mafia game.In post 1046, Frozen Angel wrote:regardless, mastina is being so lazy with properly casing some of her reads but the ones she is explaining shows she is actually thinking about details. she also explained in some short words her meta take on norwee even without examples so I find her analytical at that stage of game and it keep repeating about different reads of her at that point that makes me wonder if it can be fakable by scum mastina that consistently.
In post 1054, Datisi wrote:i guess it was that, even thought i knew myself that my vote was not a super strong one or one that intends to kill charloux, *despite that* i felt that you were mischaracterizing it or being opportunistic or wtvIn post 1051, Frozen Angel wrote:I'm more concerned now about your reaction to getting voted about it when you also admit it was a weak read and that you called out the vote instead of agreeing that the switch was based on a weak analysis and for the pressure /keeping vote active
my memory is shit and it's past midnight here, so if you want a more specific answer, please link what you're talking about in the past and what i need to respond to
I basically accused you of testing the waters. said you found an excuse (= weak legit reasoning) to jump and made a 180 to just wagon and that I could not follow the progress you wanted to make there.In post 549, Datisi wrote:i hate to bring up this pointIn post 544, Frozen Angel wrote:I should be in bed but I am not so I answer. the back track specially felt unnatural. the vote felt a sudden stance change and felt fabricated. the whole agenda seems with extra intentions - I mean with another intention than solving because you cant see how he gets there. a wagon is formed he is against it and pushes hard against it and then suddenly finds a very small excuse and jumps on the wagon himself and before anything deep or meaningful happens jumps off it for no reason.In post 542, Alisae wrote:I get your concerns but can't town do that stuff as well?
so I'm concerned for the progress he made with his mindset and I think its worth investigating
actually no i don't
do you think i don't know how to fake basic progressions as scum?
If I remember correctly, that's just mastina in all situations regardless of her alignment.In post 1055, Alisae wrote:My understanding of scum!mastina is she takes about what she knows about people and tries to twist the truth to suit whatever it is she wants.In post 1052, Frozen Angel wrote:why you think she is faking her reads?
But they aren't two different thingsIn post 1061, Datisi wrote:oh, there's actually two different things happening hereIn post 1056, Frozen Angel wrote:completely opposite of that, you said you know how to fake basic progression as scum and in this and next post you were like that it was a solid legit change of heart on that slot and the 180.
In other words, you reacted to my read with "my progression was solid so I fos you" instead of "I agree that it was a weak jump (with a weak legit reason, but the main reasons were - it was for pressure - it was to keep vote active" and I find the reaction odd for that reason
i do think my progression is solid - or at least that is makes sense, even when you account the fact that the read wasn't super strong and i didn't actually want to kill charloux at that time. like, i think despite there not being a super strong scumread from me on charloux, i think you (and anyone else) should be able to see how i got there
but my "i know how to fake a basic progression as scum" was meant to be a "i don't understand why you're finding me scummy for this". more specifically, you said that you can't see how i got there, and you tie that in for me being scummy - but my argument is that *just because* you cannot see how i got there, does not mean my thought process is fake. i felt there is an undertone in your posts that said "i can't tell how datisi got there, ergo he doesn't know how to fake a progression, ergo there is no progression and he's scum acting oppotrunistically" -- and i think that logic doesn't follow simply because i do know how to fake a progression as scum
and the fact that you went "datisi is scum because no progression" as opposed to "i can't follow the progression, maybe i just don't see it" felt oppotrunistically scummy to me
if you have any specific questions shootIn post 1076, Dannflor wrote:I think I'd rather see Frozen Angel produce more content on other things
I am not interested at all in sorting you "for you know why" in day 1 and will purposefully deny doing that as its a waste of time and energy in this phase. I in general felt good about your analytic mindset but I haven't been paying deep attention for behavioral consistency tells.In post 1078, Dannflor wrote:me and catboi would be a good starting place
especially this.In post 308, catboi wrote:In post 204, Charloux wrote:STOP.GIVING.INFO.WHEN.WE.DONT.KNOW.MAJORITY.OF.SETUP.In post 199, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:SHARP PENGUIN. DO YOU WANT TO VOTE SOMEONE IN OUR CLAN TODAY?In post 193, PenguinPower wrote:But, Dr Worm wasn’t a really doctor. So you’re not really scrrrd.
VOTE: SCRRRRBEARBut you had no problem with claiming your claim right away so why are you now acting like it's a bad thing?In post 230, Charloux wrote:I wish what happened in my hood stayed in my hood...
So 4 clans, 5 scum. My current theory is that scum are in 3 clans, and preventing them from knowing who the strays are is the key to this game.
That means no saying who the clan members are and no saying who the leaders are.
I'm not gonna focus on your slot today - town reading or scum reading your slot makes no difference for me in this day phase so I want to wait for the game to progress more.In post 1087, Dannflor wrote:wait what?In post 1082, Frozen Angel wrote:I am not interested at all in sorting you "for you know why" in day 1 and will purposefully deny doing that as its a waste of time and energy in this phase.
huh?In post 1149, Alisae wrote:what I meant by I didn't read it is I didn't read all teh wall posting in depth, what I did read is that it seemed like they were both pushing each other for being at arm's length, which makes me think they're aligned with each other
In post 642, mastina wrote:Conftown. Datisi's a major wagon, but Datisi has no interest in appeasing the players voting him, or being survivalistic, or really trying to actually fight--instead, he's sorting and pushing for who he thinks is scum.In post 636, fireisredsir wrote:confscum or conftown and whyIn post 633, mastina wrote:Datisi's never scum here btw.
The vote's wrong since it's on town.
But Datisi is conftown for this series of posting and the vote.
The Val vote has basically no momentum, but the Datisi wagon does--a Val vote does Datisi no favors.
In post 643, fireisredsir wrote:you would have miscleared datisi in like every scum game he's played recently then, thats p shallow reasoning
I'm observing something in this interaction and that is how fire made a direct shot and mastina took it and blend. Let me rephrase that, fire removed the foundation of mastinas read, and mastina didnt react to that and instead went back on her explanations of a read she feels about and "probably described bad"In post 645, mastina wrote:My explanation might be flawed to make it seem that way but it very much is not. Datisi is town for two dozen reasons. Everything he is doing is town. It just is never scum here.In post 643, fireisredsir wrote:you would have miscleared datisi in like every scum game he's played recently then, thats p shallow reasoning
Norwee is hard null for me. I dislike the wagon that was made on the slot for the direction of pressure that players who voted applied on norwee (instead of giving the slot something to react to or answer to that would help reading it better)In post 646, mastina wrote:Btw I hold to this being a true scumbloc no matter what to be honest.In post 644, mastina wrote:{Norwee, Alisae, Something_Smart} feels like a solid 3/5..
I don't have nearly the same level of certainty about elsewhere.
But I individually think this is Norwee's scumgame;
I individually think this is Alisae's scumgame;
I think that Norwee and Alisae are very specifically scum together;
Something_Smart isn't directly tied to them per se but I individually do think he's scum (sadly) and that his stances fit as scum with Norwee and Alisae.
I also scumread Titus but I'm honestly not sure if she fits as scum with them, it might be possible? But something about saying {Alisae, Norwee, Something_Smart, Titus} as 4/5 feels too easy, feels too surface-level, feels too shallow to be real. I don't have any better ideas, mind you, but better ideas can come from future day phases as we progress.
Kitty said nothing in their entire ISO till that point not just the big post actually. but how is not being involved in game from a "scum mindset" and cant be just from a town mindset that doesnt know what to do/dont feel like spending time in game/is lazy?In post 647, Datisi wrote:no, no i don't think so. though, out of curiosity - if i had answered "yes, i do think i'm outside my scumrange here", then what would you do?In post 623, catboi wrote:Like, do you think you're out of scum range right now? Because so far I think you're in the middle of both your ranges.
ftr, my poke towards you wasn't meant as a "catboi *should* have a read on me by now," it was a "i hoped he'd have a read on me by now, as that will potentially help me read him."
anyway, i like the reasoning for kittytacky being scum. upon my skim, i skipped that post because big post, but when i got back to it... it really did not say anything, huh. and the fact that he took the time to photoshop my avatar onto a clam (and photoshop it kind of *well*, considering the white pixels are barely visible), rather than, you know, do things in the game... yeah. it kind of reminds me of that one thing i did in smuggler's, where i also tried to be funny by posting an image instead of like, y'know, doing things. also, screw you for making me remember that game.
VOTE: kittytacky
after i eat, will get to isoing people to try to make sense of my weaker reads, and actually give reason for my stronger ones.interested in why mastina's so certain she's not misreading me here (despite fire specifically saying her reasoning is flawed - which i do agree with).
this means you ISOed cephir right?In post 650, Datisi wrote:why did this post exist and how did your thoughts evolve since then?In post 432, Cephrir wrote:if i had to vote right now it would be for datisi but i don't have to vote
Titus not knowing "protector of starclan" is just the default town and assuming its a special thing some (including them have) is somewhat of a town tell.In post 663, Titus wrote:[Flavor] - PROTECTOR of StarClanIn post 662, Mistyx wrote:would you be okay elaborating on what you mean by thisIn post 661, Titus wrote:I do not have that passive yet. My PM mentioned nothing about leaders but left open the possibility they exist.
My thinking (which is now likely wrong), each PT had one apprentice, one warrior, one protector and one ?. I am a protector myself.
because i'm not sure if you mean protector in the sense of role or some mechanical thing
[Part 1] - Text
[Part 2] - Text
Alignment
Confirm text
but what about her post itself and not the mechanical argument. I mean what about her knowing/not knowing/acting as she doesnt know things?In post 673, Datisi wrote:i don't care about mechanics
or more precisely, i can't read alignment from mechanical arguments
well for one, I've been basiclaly away for like 4 years + with exceptions of 2 3 games in middle? so it doesnt matter xdIn post 686, Marashu wrote:Well, since it's coming up for other people, I'll bring up I also had to step away from the site last Nov so I haven't played in almost a year.
Re: Bell/Datisi, now that I've stepped away, I'm less focused on their interaction. I still think there's something off there.
UNVOTE:
mastina's case on Alisae/Norwee is very compelling. I feel like her arguments on Alisae are stronger so it's interesting that she's more sure on Norwee. VOTE: Norwee
Mistyx gets a frozen angel pat patIn post 692, Mistyx wrote:so given this, why are you voting norwee and not alisae, if you think the case on ali is stronger?In post 686, Marashu wrote:mastina's case on Alisae/Norwee is very compelling. I feel like her arguments on Alisae are stronger so it's interesting that she's more sure on Norwee. VOTE: Norwee
Thats always a bold assumption to be right on two scum reads and a town mind set always pushes for their strongest read, when eliminating is not even being persued in day.In post 693, Marashu wrote:Because that's where the pressure is currently, and if they're both scum then does the order matter?In post 692, Mistyx wrote:so given this, why are you voting norwee and not alisae, if you think the case on ali is stronger?In post 686, Marashu wrote:mastina's case on Alisae/Norwee is very compelling. I feel like her arguments on Alisae are stronger so it's interesting that she's more sure on Norwee. VOTE: Norwee
this was about SS btw. I wanna know what posts gave you such impressions. can you be more specific about how you got there?In post 722, catboi wrote:This, also is something tht is going to be hard to explain without getting into everything about his playstyle but in the simplest possible terms, he's involved and has actual thoughts about the game ad is trying to figure things out. By his own description his scum playstyle is "basically treading water". I realize he's consciously altering his playstyle this game because normally he never gives this many reads or is this proactive as either alignment but I lean toward believing it's real and town-motivated, because he's self-aware of how his own meta is perceived and is able to play into that as scum, and I think he'd be less likely to try a playstyle ateration as that alignment. There's also little things about who he's choosing to give reads on and the stuff he's saying about being paranoid of the people he likes solving with that rings very real to me.
good vote from norwee
yeah this is too raw from SSIn post 757, Something_Smart wrote:I think this is town also but I don't have to like itIn post 661, Titus wrote:I do not have that passive yet. My PM mentioned nothing about leaders but left open the possibility they exist.
My thinking (which is now likely wrong), each PT had one apprentice, one warrior, one protector and one ?. I am a protector myself.
fire is my closest thing to a town read at the momentIn post 760, fireisredsir wrote:also i don't think you really have to worry about the post restriction, you have 13 posts lol. just play normally and you're never gonna hit 200 posts in a day
getting more engaged is like the ideal result of a wagon, thats kinda the goal, to see how the person responds to pressure. and i do think your response feels townier than your response to pressure in turing test
VOTE: marashu
good post from alisaeIn post 761, Alisae wrote:In post 741, KittyTacky wrote:I'm struggling to adapt to this post restriction.So like, are you just lying?In post 745, KittyTacky wrote:I'm legit trying but it's hard. I also never played a large theme before.
Because I don't believe you considering at a cursory look at your games where you don't even break past 200 posts in COMPLETED GAMES and we're only in d1.. Like, there are players in here that post way way more but you're the one that's struggling??? Like, 200 is such a lenient post cap I don't see how anyone can struggle as long as they show some restraint and like, actually post with purpose.
But those are the only two options. "was it from a town mind set" or "was it from a scum mind set"In post 766, Alisae wrote:How are these questions real things being asked???You think you are sheeping something that makes sense and I think you are using that to justify hiding behind mastina.
umm ... ok?
yeah but you talked about your other null reads.In post 1168, Datisi wrote:i isoed everyone (other than the people i already had a strong read on)In post 1166, Frozen Angel wrote:this means you ISOed cephir right?
if someone ended up in null despite that, that means they are null to me
it is white-knighting regardless of the history. but is it cause of a confident read, an attempt to pocket or to protect a buddy is the real question.In post 774, Charloux wrote:In post 768, Alisae wrote: Anyway, I am curious to hear a deeper take on some of the things I've said in 261 and 279.Spoiler:That's why i said from the perspective of someone who doesn't know the history between you two.In post 768, Alisae wrote:I am without a doubt the best player on the table to read the player???In post 767, Charloux wrote:From a perspective of someone who doesn't know the history between Alisae and norwegian this feels pretty iffy to me.
- I have lots of games with him. We've been town together, we've been scum together, and we've been oppositely aligned before.
- He LITERALLY came out of his way to play with me. It makes sense, it's been awhile and I just came back from a 1 year vacation.
- I have an understanding of how he is as a person based on things he how he has acted before and past experiences. We've hydra'd before and that gave me a good idea into his thought processes at the time.
- I have a neighborhood with him. In this neighborhood, he is posting his thoughts. I have access to these thoughts.
Like, what is there to be iffy about???
I can see you both white-knighting him as well as pocketing him.
This was hell posting on the phone
cause I received a town role pm from modIn post 783, Bell wrote:@FrozenAngel: why aren’t you scum this game?
Hugs and cookies and congratulations!In post 784, Shiro wrote:Busy cookies.
Sorry for vanishing. I learned i passed my entrance exams for drama School and I didnt have time. I am starting next week,wll participate for now but if i dont manage to have free time i moght sadly replace out:( Shame it was a wonderful player list.
great minds and all thatIn post 792, Shiro wrote:There is absolutly no way Alisae and Norwee interaction were scum-scumIn post 572, mastina wrote:The strength of Alisae's scumread on Val is overblown, in a way that I feel indicates that Val caught Alisae and Norwee's interaction being scum-scum for what it is.
and one of the reasons I hate mastina wagon are some of votes on itIn post 1588, Bell wrote:Okay,
so
I'll be real here.
My meta on Mastina is basically:
Will Mastina have a meltdown?
Y: Scum.
N: Town.
They had a meltdown.
I'm fine with this. For the day.
VOTE: Mastina
Ah, I see what you're saying for plot reasons one kitty leaves the clan/is evil.
While Titus is the good rogue kitty that comes in to shore up the clan that had a loss/betrayal.
Makes sense from a plot point perspective.
...I forgot what Ydra said about this. *shrug* I'm sure someone will dig it up.
there were no discussions in river clan about mastina.In post 1599, Bell wrote:We of the river clan* have reached a consensus.
Vote Mastina.
*it’s the royal we.
In post 583, Bell wrote:Oh. I’m fine killing norwe if mastina is 97.5% certain they’re scum.
VOTE: Norwe
In post 1347, Bell wrote:VOTE: Datisi
*FOS Mastina*
Nevermind. It fits. Nothing to be paranoid about there.
Why is this guy so easily convinced of everything? even stuff his suspects say?!In post 1588, Bell wrote:Okay,
so
I'll be real here.
My meta on Mastina is basically:
Will Mastina have a meltdown?
Y: Scum.
N: Town.
They had a meltdown.
I'm fine with this. For the day.
VOTE: Mastina
Ah, I see what you're saying for plot reasons one kitty leaves the clan/is evil.
While Titus is the good rogue kitty that comes in to shore up the clan that had a loss/betrayal.
Makes sense from a plot point perspective.
...I forgot what Ydra said about this. *shrug* I'm sure someone will dig it up.