it looks genuinely uninformed. like, I don't see someone who knows every alignment writing that.In post 1297, GreyICE wrote:That justification seems very weak. What about the post is "super townie"?
Gunner Mafia [Endgame]
Forum rules
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka AnyJack of All Trades
- Ausuka
Any- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7924
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: Any
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Jack of All Trades
- Brian Skies
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9999
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
This also isn't cheerleading?In post 1288, Panopticon wrote:
Your iso would seem to indicate that you'd like to vote Hopkirk but you're actually voting....srceenplay? right now?In post 1285, Brian Skies wrote:What exactly am I cheerleading?
But you haven't interacted with him at all for a while unless I'm fuckin blind.
~The Observer-
-
Brigand Vvulf
- GreyICE
-
GreyICE Fifty Shades
- GreyICE
- Fifty Shades
- Fifty Shades
- Posts: 15347
- Joined: December 15, 2010
You're not wrong on the first, I'll buy the second after hypnotoad read from Ausuka. That was godawful.In post 1299, Centipede Syndrome wrote:Ausuka is still scum, Hopkirk is town. also Grey is town but hopefully you all knew that. Hopkirk's town because i say so and also because of the bad read on us. and also because Twin Trap.
if Elli gets us lynched i'm not counting it because hydra. haha.
~Chara- Thor665
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Thor665
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
That's not true - what I said was you couldn't describe it. Which IS true.
What I called scummy was your inability to explain how a theoretical six worse players were less scummy than your current top scumspect.In post 1244, Srceenplay wrote:You are trying to call my playstlye anti town. That’s like saying I don’t deserve to be playing this game.
Am I awesome and able to be a town leader. No. And I don’t try because that’s not what I do. Iirc you called it playstyle as well and now you call it scumy.
That you didn't take me up on the challenge shows I'm right that you couldn't.
That it offends you suggests I have a point that it's weak play.
I'm sorry that offends you - but since it appears to be true, and all I'm saying is that it's not good for town if you're town (which is also objectively true) why are you busting my balls instead of trying to explain your reads better?
I actually describe activity as townish, and suggest that lurking is scummy - the opposite of what you think I'm saying. Go look at my words again.In post 1244, Srceenplay wrote:Your town read didn’t sit well either.
You describe what scum would be trying to do and the describe activity as scumy when it should be nai unless you have meta on someone that says otherwise.In post 1151, Thor665 wrote:The case for him being town is he's here, he'sactive, he'srocking the boat, and, within the context of how he plays, heappears to be trying to gamesolve.
Which is more than I can say for easily six other players.
So EVEN IF you want to call him scum - the real question is why aren't those six other lurksacks opportunistic voters MORE scummy to you?
Does this realization change your attitude towards my read?
I also disagree that scum tend to be active, be rocking the boat, and be trying to gamesolve.
If you think that's what scum do what do you think town do?
That's silly and illogical. It IS your problem if you're asking me to do something other than what I'm doing but have no actual drive to explain what else I should do.In post 1245, CheekyTeeky wrote:
Not Hopkirk.In post 1234, Thor665 wrote:Who do you think i should be better spending my time pressuring exactly? I can't even tell who you're pressuring unless it's me - and that's a waste of my time to join you on, so...?
Not my problem try reading my posts. Point taken about wagon jumping though...still I like my style ^^
I clearly think I'm doing okay with what I'm doing, so I have no desire to random change based on nothing.
All he's doing in that post is making a case on me.In post 1300, Ausuka wrote:
it looks genuinely uninformed. like, I don't see someone who knows every alignment writing that.In post 1297, GreyICE wrote:That justification seems very weak. What about the post is "super townie"?
How does that look genuinely uninformed?- Centipede Syndrome
-
Centipede Syndrome Goon
- Centipede Syndrome
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: February 16, 2018
- Spiffeh
-
Spiffeh Paragone
- Spiffeh
- Paragone
- Paragone
- Posts: 14749
- Joined: July 26, 2015
- Location: Delaware
- Centipede Syndrome
-
Centipede Syndrome Goon
- Centipede Syndrome
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: February 16, 2018
- Spiffeh
-
Spiffeh Paragone
- Spiffeh
- Paragone
- Paragone
- Posts: 14749
- Joined: July 26, 2015
- Location: Delaware
- Centipede Syndrome
-
Centipede Syndrome Goon
- Centipede Syndrome
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: February 16, 2018
- Centipede Syndrome
-
Centipede Syndrome Goon
- Centipede Syndrome
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: February 16, 2018
- Centipede Syndrome
-
Centipede Syndrome Goon
- Centipede Syndrome
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: February 16, 2018
- Srceenplay
-
Srceenplay Jack of All Trades
- Srceenplay
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7419
- Joined: November 29, 2016
In post 1304, Thor665 wrote:That's not true - what I said was you couldn't describe it. Which IS true.
I’m saying I think I already did
In post 1244, Srceenplay wrote:
You are trying to call my playstlye anti town. That’s like saying I don’t deserve to be playing this game.
Am I awesome and able to be a town leader. No. And I don’t try because that’s not what I do. Iirc you called it playstyle as well and now you call it scumy.
What I called scummy was your inability to explain how a theoretical six worse players were less scummy than your current top scumspect.
That you didn't take me up on the challenge shows I'm right that you couldn't.
That it offends you suggests I have a point that it's weak play.
I'm sorry that offends you - but since it appears to be true, and all I'm saying is that it's not good for town if you're town (which is also objectively true) why are you busting my balls instead of trying to explain your reads better?
My point was you are using activity as AI. I meant to say lack of activity you are saying is scumy. You describe what scum should be trying to do as AI. You are looking at surface level shit and trying to make something out of it. That’s fake. You find scum from lies or subconscious slips. The later is what I like.
In post 1244, Srceenplay wrote:
Your town read didn’t sit well either.
In post 1151, Thor665 wrote:
The case for him being town is he's here, he's active , he's rocking the boat , and, within the context of how he plays, he appears to be trying to gamesolve .
Which is more than I can say for easily six other players.
So EVEN IF you want to call him scum - the real question is why aren't those six other lurksacks opportunistic voters MORE scummy to you?
You describe what scum would be trying to do and the describe activity as scumy when it should be nai unless you have meta on someone that says otherwise.
I actually describe activity as townish, and suggest that lurking is scummy - the opposite of what you think I'm saying. Go look at my words again.
Does this realization change your attitude towards my read?
I also disagree that scum tend to be active, be rocking the boat, and be trying to gamesolve.
If you think that's what scum do what do you think town dono it doesn’t change my attitude.
I’m not saying “scum are active”. Scum can be active and inactive. Town can be active and inactive. NAI. Trying to pass it as scum hunting is fake.
I already said what town should do."A man can not be too careful on the choices of his enemies." Oscar Wilde- Srceenplay
-
Srceenplay Jack of All Trades
- Srceenplay
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7419
- Joined: November 29, 2016
- Thor665
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Thor665
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Could you quote it for me?
What is the lie or subconscious slip you've caught anyone doing so far?In post 1312, Srceenplay wrote:My point was you are using activity as AI. I meant to say lack of activity you are saying is scumy. You describe what scum should be trying to do as AI. You are looking at surface level Smurf and trying to make something out of it. That’s fake. You find scum from lies or subconscious slips. The later is what I like.
You're changing your vote tome, what is the lie or slip I did?
There are assuredly players who will openly self admit that their activity changes with alignment.In post 1312, Srceenplay wrote:no it doesn’t change my attitude.
I’m not saying “scum are active”. Scum can be active and inactive. Town can be active and inactive. NAI. Trying to pass it as scum hunting is fake.
I already said what town should do.
I'll note in this game people are discussing stuff about Creature in that vein - does that not affect your thoughts on the tell? Or is your presumption people who think this and self meta as it are all fooling themselves?- Thor665
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Thor665
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
@Srceenplay - It also just occurred to me that you're raging at me for "surface tells" of activity.
Your best explained read is on Quick - and is that he's doing AtE and when I asked you how the AtE benefited his scum plan you couldn't/chose not to answer.
That's your deep level analysis on him?
Your Brian read is a ping.
All of your other reads are less explained than that.
I'm fine with surface level reads, I think they work great. I respect deep reads, I think they also work.
But you raging on me for being too surface when that's your entire case presentation feels fake to me. There definitely feels like a double standard happening here, especially since you're kind of straw manning my Quick read into activity (or at least claiming analysis of scumhunting equates to a shallow activity read - which I would disagree with).- Srceenplay
-
Srceenplay Jack of All Trades
- Srceenplay
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7419
- Joined: November 29, 2016
In post 330, Srceenplay wrote:
This post seals them as scum for me.In post 182, Quick wrote:
You saw me do the exact same thing before when I was Town so I'm really not sure why you have a problem with it???In post 178, beeboy wrote:
I mean whats the reason for your vote then?In post 155, Quick wrote:Not at all. I'm not reading through that shit.
And why are you choosing to just ignore all this games content and just complaining about the lack of it.
I voted who I thought was the "leader" of the Scum faction."A man can not be too careful on the choices of his enemies." Oscar Wilde- Srceenplay
-
Srceenplay Jack of All Trades
- Srceenplay
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7419
- Joined: November 29, 2016
- Srceenplay
-
Srceenplay Jack of All Trades
- Srceenplay
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7419
- Joined: November 29, 2016
- Srceenplay
-
Srceenplay Jack of All Trades
- Srceenplay
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7419
- Joined: November 29, 2016
- Thor665
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Thor665
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Okay, I understand that's the post.
Can you explain the case/deeper read?- Thor665
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Thor665
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
That also wasn't Brain, but, whatever.- Toranaga
-
Toranaga Jack of All Trades
- Toranaga
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5134
- Joined: July 26, 2017
I'll 100% ignore your read unless I actually agree with it on the principle that none of this is any fun as far as mafia games are concernedIn post 1305, Centipede Syndrome wrote:i have someone as 100% scum now.
only one though and I'm too busy to do the rest so I'm leaving that to chara.
stay tuned.
also you have pretty high wolf equity yourself and chara isn't helping
tchill wagon still pretty solid. he refused to do any kind of work in the game and didn't approach me in a towny manner. sorry I don't have a software to be sure about it...-
-
Brigand Vvulf Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 133
- Joined: April 14, 2018
In post 1305, Centipede Syndrome wrote:i have someone as 100% scum now.
only one though and I'm too busy to do the rest so I'm leaving that to chara.
stay tuned.Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Toranaga
- Thor665
- Thor665
- Srceenplay
- Srceenplay
- Srceenplay
- Srceenplay
- Thor665
- Thor665
- Srceenplay
- Srceenplay
- Centipede Syndrome
- Centipede Syndrome
- Centipede Syndrome
- Spiffeh
- Centipede Syndrome
- Spiffeh
- Centipede Syndrome
- Thor665
- GreyICE
- Brian Skies
- Ausuka