fuck off, manIn post 299, Almost50 wrote:That would be because you're not reading what I'm typing, perhaps?In post 298, Mathdino wrote:also why no interest in the 4s and 5s?
you know as well as i do that scum is not literally {1, 2, 3}
why is iconeum MORE likely to be scum than TW? why lynch in increasing order?
and since we know scum is not {1, 2, 3}, that confirms someone as scum outside that group. going by your logic, that would heavily implicate a 4 or 5.
your theory at its most basic makes sense -- there's scum in the low numbers. obviously.
but you don't seem to be acting in a way that's actually in line with you having thought through your draft-based setup spec.