In post 71, Ouroboros wrote:Wilky had an odd reaction to being CCed and I think he might be scum miller given miller as a fakeclaim.
I wasn't cc'ed
In post 71, Ouroboros wrote:Wilky had an odd reaction to being CCed and I think he might be scum miller given miller as a fakeclaim.
'Town' great? You haven't voted for him, so I'm guessing 'town great'?In post 68, Tchill13 wrote:Alchemists post is great.
I don't think the mod would bait scum into claiming miller like that?In post 79, Ouroboros wrote:I also have a very good grasp of the way GIF's mind works and him putting 1 scum with miller fakeclaim countering 1 town miller makes so, so much sense
???In post 70, wilky wrote:I mean I brought up the flavour thing and even pointed to which part of the PM it is contained within. As scum I wouldn't know that information if everyone wants me to claim first then that's fine by me.
Please let's not outguess the mod k?In post 83, Ouroboros wrote:I actually think that the mod explicitly would given that his last game had two town millers.
Like this is SUCH an "I'm scum and didn't have fakeclaims" response.In post 87, wilky wrote:So we're just assuming that safe claims are given now?
Well it doesnt feel like that, it feels more like scum using fake claims to their advantage, but i do wonder, eh why not.In post 89, Ouroboros wrote:Like this is SUCH an "I'm scum and didn't have fakeclaims" response.In post 87, wilky wrote:So we're just assuming that safe claims are given now?
In post 88, Ouroboros wrote:No I actually explicitly don't think that safe claims were given since giffles didn't last game: I think that your role is actually miller but you're scum and that the role PM is something memey about you being a miller despite being scum.
That's also such, such, such a scummy reaction.
WE'RE LYNCHING BUGS BUNNY BOYS EASY GAME.
Is this something people do? I thought the general consensus was that if there is a vig, miller claims should be shot. A solo miller claim is a bad day 1 lynch.
This joke is never funny.
Is your goal to just be annoying?In post 45, Ramcius wrote:VOTE: MariaRIn post 44, MariaR wrote:Eh I just want to get out of RVS I'm hyped about this game and the talk of miller play that comes down to throwing opinions around isn't really my style. We'll get a serious vote and time I guess I just won't be the one to do it...maybeIn post 41, Alchemist21 wrote:Nah the trick is to withhold your vote until that person makes even a mildly substantial post, then throw it down and say Serious Vote. It's a known trick but still works. The catch is that you're more likely to get reactions from other people who want to know why rather than the actual target.In post 38, MariaR wrote:I was just looking to see if you'd act sketchy/squeamish about it...although perhaps I should've said srs vote after a few more posts cause maybe it was obv I was trying to get a reaction. Reeeee
Pedit: I trust everyone until you give me a reason not too
i like RVS, so you just became my enemy
We don't even know that you both got the same flavor.In post 94, wilky wrote:In post 88, Ouroboros wrote:No I actually explicitly don't think that safe claims were given since giffles didn't last game: I think that your role is actually miller but you're scum and that the role PM is something memey about you being a miller despite being scum.
That's also such, such, such a scummy reaction.
WE'RE LYNCHING BUGS BUNNY BOYS EASY GAME.
Actually the PM isn't memey at all just the miller part has its own flavour (and is not explicitly called miller in the ability parts) to fit in with the flavour of the game.