I never said it did. People do anti town things all the time. Go look at every game boon or radiant cowbells has ever played for examples of that.In post 273, profii wrote:Can you explain why a no vote or a self vote can be pro town? (Particularly the self vote, I can see that a no vote might be a cop out of town can’t find scum but usually flips and odd number player lists are more useful imo)
I can’t provide reasons they are protown. In this instance they aren’t.In post 276, profii wrote:I didn’t say you said that. But I’m asking you to provide reasons that those actions are pro town, irrespective of anything I said
I'd agree but this is Gus being Gus I think. He thinks strongly about his D1 beliefs afaikIn post 197, Chickadee wrote:This reads as needlessly defensive.In post 186, Gustavo wrote:So you admit I’ve contributed something. Why did you lie about me and say I haven’t contributed?
I’m not tunneling either. Please stop lying about me.
Not sure if that's a compliment or an insult... 'In post 203, davesaz wrote: HitAlt seems townier than what I'm used to. So does HeWhoSwims.
Except you kinda did, you entered with a vote on profii and said you didn't like his posts... To add onto that I think that the things you consider scummy are not that scummy.In post 217, Gustavo wrote:Except that’s not what I did at all. Yet another lie from you.In post 216, Inferno390 wrote:You’re missing the point.
In mafia, what you do is form a case and then judge someone based on that case. In AbN, you assume someone’s alignment and then build a case around the assumption.
Ex.
“Player X has been doing this, so he’s scum.”
Vs
“Player X is scum!”
*Player X does something*
“See? What Player X sis is scummy! Die scum!”
Your progression is firmly of the latter.
Personally... No I don't think I would immediately call the other player scum (without scumreading them before of course), I'd rather engage in the 1v1 and hope it gets written off as TvT and/or the opponent is being scumread. But, there's always a playstyle element to this choice I think.In post 232, Elbirn wrote:Post 81 though, this 1v1 paranoia is something he's brought up a few times, and I'm not sure it's something I'd expect scum to have on their mind. Like..If I'm playing scum and someone's drawing me into a conversation, my first instinct of things to post is not "You're scum trying to trap me/earn towncred". I might think town is trying to trap me, but I'm not going to accuse the other person of being scum. No? Yes?
But the issue here is informer said I provided no content. When I said I did he changed his story to not liking my content.In post 278, HeWhoSwims wrote:I'd agree but this is Gus being Gus I think. He thinks strongly about his D1 beliefs afaik
You and I were having a conversation. I wasn’t adding on anythingIn post 278, HeWhoSwims wrote:Except you kinda did, you entered with a vote on profii and said you didn't like his posts... To add onto that I think that the things you consider scummy are not that scummy.
In post 242, brassherald wrote: Use post tags, it's really not that hard.
Tbh these posts alone are why I'm in favour of keeping you to day 3 at leastIn post 243, brassherald wrote: Am I even here? Is this a sixth sense scenario?
This is the equivalent to playing mafia irl and sitting down in a corner, arms crossed, not wanting to play 'cause the game isn't going your way... Our wooden overlord specifically asked for a chill game so the both of you keep it down.In post 256, Inferno390 wrote:I’m done with Gus at this point, he’s confscum at this point for me. Elbirn’s post on me feels very strong. As for Rask’s motivation, I honestly think it was just RVS and he was messing around. Also, @Elbrin I had nothing against your self vote. It’s the responses that came after it that felt off. (Oh, and that wall post is nothing. I’ve seen way worse.)
Why though? I haven’t done anything wrong or scummy so cause I call somebody out and defend myself that warrants votes? That’s weak.In post 287, HeWhoSwims wrote:Gus I feel your playstyle will always attract votes
194 definitely isn’t. I could see why 214 could be interpreted that way but I didn’t name names.In post 291, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Gustavo if you are Town and don’t understand that 194 and 215 are very toxic posts and the reason people have called you that you need to step back and reevaluate.
If you are scum the feigned ignorance makes sense.
In post 293, Gustavo wrote:194 definitely isn’t. I could see why 214 could be interpreted that way but I didn’t name names.In post 291, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Gustavo if you are Town and don’t understand that 194 and 215 are very toxic posts and the reason people have called you that you need to step back and reevaluate.
If you are scum the feigned ignorance makes sense.
If you are so concerned about toxic play? Why contribute to it yourself? why not hold yourself and informer accountable also?
Magna, those in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. You should drop the toxic talk given the fact you’ve got 2 example of toxicity in this post alone.In post 244, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Why are all you peeps ignoring scumFlubber?
I mean voting Gus who has been a toxic jerk probably feels good but just because he is pompous and condescending doesn’t mean he is scum. Just that he’s a bad player in the wrong game.
