Idk I think there might be something there but I wasn't paying to much attention cos you guys were having like 3 different conversations and I only really paid attention to one while going through it
I wasn’t responding to you. My response was to whoever he was talking to, but thanks. How can I earn more scum points? I want the mostIn post 1100, Gamma Emerald wrote:Idk I think there might be something there but I wasn't paying to much attention cos you guys were having like 3 different conversations and I only really paid attention to one while going through it
PEdit: I already said I understood the intent of the post. 5 scumpoints for House Gustavo.
Not really? I mean I had the opinion he did with the question he asked me, but that doesn't mean I could just copy him, I'm fairly certain he could be able to tell.In post 1012, Gustavo wrote:Sorry predecessor. I’m having trouble deciphering your posts. I see where you ask questions and then seem to answer them yourself which basically makes them useless. I’m not sure going backwards at this point will be useful. I also didn’t see anything super important in them. I’ll try again when I get to a computer.In post 828, stungun0404 wrote:DEAR WHOEVER REPLACES ME: ONE MISSION; LOOK INTO WHO DIDN’T RESPOND TO MY QUESTIONS, PLEASE!
okay in that case the scumpoints are retracted because I thought you were responding to a closed thought which felt kinda sketchy, because as scum I myself have had the habit of responding to irrelevant things (I do it as town too but I feel like it's more prominent from scum!me)In post 1103, Gustavo wrote:I wasn’t responding to you. My response was to whoever he was talking to, but thanks. How can I earn more scum points? I want the mostIn post 1100, Gamma Emerald wrote:Idk I think there might be something there but I wasn't paying to much attention cos you guys were having like 3 different conversations and I only really paid attention to one while going through it
PEdit: I already said I understood the intent of the post. 5 scumpoints for House Gustavo.
No my case has absolutely nothing to do with meta. The point of the meta dive was to prove she lied. The lying, not cooperating, refusing to provide a reason for her vote, and misrepping other players while accusing me of it are basically why I’m scum reading.In post 1101, skitter30 wrote:like half of your case was based on meta and whether or not she gives reasons for votes
ok thank you because i still wasn't sure what the lie wasIn post 1105, Shoshin wrote:Skitter, I didn't lie about anything. Gus thinks I lied because I said I voted without providing any reasoning in Tropical and he's in denial about the reality that I did in fact vote without reasoning in Tropical. I think Irrelephant cleared this up earlier.
Honestly I think you might be irrational here, at least wrt how you're criticizing Shoshin for lying about not explaining reads when she's provided fairly solid proof and others have backed it up afaictIn post 1024, Gustavo wrote:I’m not going to argue this game. I’m done with you. You aren’t willing to cooperate clearly. It’s going to just piss me off and I need to stay chill because the mod I’m sure didn’t even want me to play.
Honestly sameIn post 1034, Irrelephant11 wrote:hmmm browsing gustavo's meta gets me back toward a townread, though
I just think he's wrong
Yeah, pretty much. Even if I had lied (which I didn't), it's not even scummy. Like, what's he think I'm trying to hide? But he's got one of those black-and-white mindsets that assumes any lie is scummy without any further analysis, so I don't think there's much point arguing with him about it.In post 1108, skitter30 wrote:ok thank you because i still wasn't sure what the lie wasIn post 1105, Shoshin wrote:Skitter, I didn't lie about anything. Gus thinks I lied because I said I voted without providing any reasoning in Tropical and he's in denial about the reality that I did in fact vote without reasoning in Tropical. I think Irrelephant cleared this up earlier.
i really don't think this is significant or like ai at all
I honestly don’t believe you didn’t see the post.In post 1102, skitter30 wrote:also, again, can you show me where you think she was lying?
I don't see that anyone responded to this so what was meant was that shoshin's goal was creating wagonsIn post 1050, Gustavo wrote:Idk what this means. End of creating wagons?In post 1049, Irrelephant11 wrote:A lot of shoshin's reason-less votes have been toward the end of creating wagons imo
That's what's pro-town about her play and her voting
He did lie. Quite blatantly and because he tried to use that lie against me, it makes it AIIn post 1108, skitter30 wrote:ok thank you because i still wasn't sure what the lie wasIn post 1105, Shoshin wrote:Skitter, I didn't lie about anything. Gus thinks I lied because I said I voted without providing any reasoning in Tropical and he's in denial about the reality that I did in fact vote without reasoning in Tropical. I think Irrelephant cleared this up earlier.
i really don't think this is significant or like ai at all
I think that's a good point about the "eh what do I know" pattern. I agree that it's a strong tell (as much as I try not to, I always end up doing it as scum myself) but townies do it too and you have to read it in light of everything else. He's got strong hints of town plus a couple questionable patterns so not really who I want to lynch today unless everyone else suddenly becomes more town than him.In post 1054, Momrangal wrote:I do agree that 388 is a solid post. But I feel like a large majority of them are kinda just sitting in the middle and when he does take a stance he does this weird "eh what do I know thing" like in post 375 . He also did it in 323 when pushing Dino, making it feel like he's subliminally excusing himself from taking responsibility from anything that happened. Making it easier to brush it off as oversight or some othet thing. Something I see scum do constantly, something I'm always noting (like I did in implos large game as well in a few games in my old account).
It's subtle tell that people have thought me crazy to point out but has outstanding accuracy.
What do you think of me now?In post 1074, Gustavo wrote:And that is a huge red flag.In post 884, Gamma Emerald wrote:I haven't voted once
With regards to gamma one could argue he’s avoiding this game. Last post here on Tuesday. Posted on site yesterday. Logged on today.
Couple of questions:In post 1079, Nauci wrote:Okay so
I don't know how I feel about Gus but he did ruffle enough feathers that I now have better reads on people.
Shoshin goes from null-town to town-lean (now that I realize she was casing me more than defending Irrelephant, I'm feeling really good about her)
Irrelephant11 goes from scummy to null
Momrangal goes from null to scummy
And all of the lurkers are on the naughty list, including math
Skitter the wk is an interesting theory; do you believe the premise for it, that tw is town?
Strangely enough the duckster has somehow earned a null from me for now
There are way too many places I want to vote right now but I'll start with VOTE: momrangal
Why are you saying to vote me here?In post 1089, Mathdino wrote:Holy balls N_M is here
If he posts then there's no fear
I'm really sorry for ghosting y'all
My sitewide posting has slowed to a crawl
I'll stop rhyming when I can sit down and write
Until then I still think a Gamvote is right
In post 962, Shoshin wrote:No shit. What do you think my answer will tell you about my alignment if you know I do this as town?
In post 959, Shoshin wrote:As you know from Tropical, I don't always state my reasons for voting. So why ask this question?
Lies by shoshin fwiwIn post 962, Shoshin wrote:No shit. What do you think my answer will tell you about my alignment if you know I do this as town?
fyi I have a couple of leads but no concrete scumreads yetIn post 1092, skitter30 wrote:gamma, who's scum?
Sorry meant this one and not the duplicateIn post 959, Shoshin wrote:As you know from Tropical, I don't always state my reasons for voting. So why ask this question?
Somebody did respond and I responded back.In post 1113, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don't see that anyone responded to this so what was meant was that shoshin's goal was creating wagonsIn post 1050, Gustavo wrote:Idk what this means. End of creating wagons?In post 1049, Irrelephant11 wrote:A lot of shoshin's reason-less votes have been toward the end of creating wagons imo
That's what's pro-town about her play and her voting