NY214: Project Pinecone (Game over! Town wins!)

[xyzzy]

OK, with this in mind, I have a CRAZY idea that will likely backfire, so I'll skip that.
But.
I feel 75% sure I was protected last night AND I got a guilty on the scummie who tried to kill me.

TO BE CERTAIN WOULD REQUIRE OUR VIG TO STEP FORWARD AND CLAIM THE KILL THAT WENT THROUGH.

Opinions?

I'm currently catching up on the posts so far today but I really hate this post. if you're going to make some grandiose statement like this then, like, back it up with an explanation for why it's true instead of just asking a vig to come forward

[HitAlt]

Well this is the point where I am going to point blank say you cried wolf Day 1 and you are out of goodwill on “Teehee look how gambitty I am”.

If you honestly think you have effectively two guilties then you should be pushing the issue to the fricken wall with one Mafia dead.

Special saddle for such a high horse..?

And yet, funnily enough, we now have the same read on TW/brass.

I WAS ONLY BEATING AROUND THE BUSH TODAY BECAUSE I WANTED TO SEE IF DUCKY WOULD INCRIMINATE THEIR BUDDY TOO.

Make no mistake - Ducky is talkin bullshit, and is scum.
They finally said a thing they can't wiggle out of.
Brass is either his buddy or an SK.
Third scum likely in Ausuka/MoI/Chickadee based on claims alone.

We force Duck to fullclaim his action from lastnight as soon as possible, if anyone is still not convinced, and I'll fullclaim to seal the deal.

Fking "teehee" NigaHiga-ass mfking rolecircus with crumbs and all.

[xyzzy]

Townbloc

Taly
Chickadee
HitAlt
Inferno390
Raskolnikov
Ausuka

Everyone active in the thread right now is giving me townvibes. Like

Brass, Andrius

becoming townleans.

i guess we can wait for the vig. i still don't get scumreads on tw at all.

Take my scumreads with a grain of salt at the moment because with

Dram

flipping scum, a lot of my reads are being reset to what they were Mid-D1, but I have more game information to process.

My brain is going 90 MPH at the moment, and since I'm blending a

"Conversational Posting Style"

with my

"Wallpost Style"

, it's showing.

[xyzzy]

I think xyzxyz might be scum he commented on hit and flub not dram. But he had opportunities to like in 1086 (at the end where he responded to taly)

honestly I just really never had very strong opinions about anything dramonic posted. I know that sounds like a fake copout but it's true

[xyzzy]

read my responses to you really carefully
if you want to go down this path it's 100% up to you but it's not my preference.

OK, I'm willing to take the blame then as I can't see what you might have hinted at there.

NO MORE HINTING (or hidden meanings):

I'm proposing that you did nothing last night, is that assumption correct?

OMG THE WIFOM IN RESPONDING TO THIS POST
are you asking this last question because you love me and respect me?

I'm still scumreading HitAlt but regardless of their alignment I think they deffo don't have the same alignment as the worst so on the off chance the worst flips scum I will be inclined to believe HitAlt is town

[xyzzy]

Btw I think someone probably has an inno on me

is this just a broad in general statement or are you saying a particular, specific person?

[xyzzy]

outliving like 40 other people is shitttt

<3

[the worst]

Hit. I am not claiming my action from last night until necessary but all will be obvious WHEN I am night killed. Full claim or settle down because rn you sound like scum who did see my night action and is faking a soft guilty to get a lynch thru.

[the worst]

outliving like 40 other people is shitttt

<3

so much trauma fam

[profii]

mod / all

apologies - VLA until sunday, manic at work and visiting fam this weekend... I'm skim keeping up but there's loads to comment on so I'll put in a concerted effort towards end of weekend/next week

[HitAlt]

Hit. I am not claiming my action from last night until necessary but all will be obvious WHEN I am night killed. Full claim or settle down because rn you sound like scum who did see my night action and is faking a soft guilty to get a lynch thru.

If I were to be scum fakeclaiming to get a lynch through, I would be submitting myself up for a trade 1for1..?

I am not claiming before you, simply because if I don't need to fullclaim, we can take advantage of my role-specific caveat the following night too.
And since scum already lost their roleblockage..

TO ANYONE READING THIS, I WANT TO MAKE SURE THIS IS NOT A GAMBIT ANYMORE, NOR IS MY GUILTY "SOFT". DUCK IS SCUM NOW.

ye I got a confirming pm

Them refusing to claim and hinting that everything will be clear after they flip is bullshit - my result makes their night-action very clear.

THEY WOULD

NEVER

GET A PM-RESPONSE AS TOWN

, meaning that they tried their best to guess what I was hinting at and wiggle their way out of it.

GOT'EM.

[xyzzy]

If I were to be scum fakeclaiming to get a lynch through, I would be submitting myself up for a trade 1for1..?

I think I'd be willing to take you up on doing just that

[HitAlt]

Well you won't get it.
He already confirmed my guilty on him, and if he was town he would have had NO REASON not to claim or at least hint his role properly right away.
I gave him a chance to do it, and he would be capable of doing it if he really wanted to.

[the worst]

I still don't even understand what you think I did.

[xyzzy]

y'know

VOTE: HitAlt

this is still the right choice

[the worst]

Hit can you please out what you think I did in plain terms? don't out your soft guilty if you don't need to, just tell me what you think happened here in 20 words or less.

[HitAlt]

Hit can you please out what you think I did in plain terms? don't out your soft guilty if you don't need to, just tell me what you think happened here in 20 words or less.

I don't need to even do this anymore with you, but I guess some others might need something..
I try to come up with a way where you can't vaguely avoid committing to a specific type of a claim.
Also adding xyzzy to the list of highly potential scum.
Scum ought to be getting desperate by now.

[xyzzy]

so that's a "no" to explaining your reasoning in plain terms then

[HitAlt]

@Duck:

1. Assuming you performed an action last night - are you able to say FOR CERTAIN that your action succeeded?

2. If your answer to the above is NO - who did you target (if you can choose a target)?

3. If your answer to 1 is "NO" - do you have a weapon or not?

[xyzzy]

HitAlt, do you believe that you're going to convince anyone that the worst is for sure, without a doubt mafia through your current behavior? if so, why? if not, why are you acting this way?

[HitAlt]

I am calling a guilty.
If people are unconvinced in the end that he is scum, I DEMAND to be lynched today.
Only reason I'm doing circles is because I'm protecting another townie by doing so.
My claim is set in stone, has been for a long time.
My trackrecord as a town-PR is enough for me to be confident in how I do this - you can all disagree with me after the game.

Town!TW would've already made so many things differently, but I also got him to solidify my guilty with something he said himself.

[brassherald]

If your claim is set in stone could you just
full claim? I have issues with following someone on a guilty when they won't tell us their role in plain English. Pretend I'm an idiot who needs everything explained to him slowly.

Because I'm an idiot.

Who needs everything explained to him.

Slowly

[HitAlt]

In the very unlikely scenario where I'm not killed or blocked, I will claim everything else but the not-normal "caveat" in my role tomorrow.

Just let TW answer me and my claim will follow.
Alongside a townie, I'm protecting that "caveat".

[the worst]

@Duck:

1. Assuming you performed an action last night - are you able to say FOR CERTAIN that your action succeeded?

2. If your answer to the above is NO - who did you target (if you can choose a target)?

3. If your answer to 1 is "NO" - do you have a weapon or not?

I'm so wasted bro you already know this I think??????

[the worst]

actually I've softed the fuck outta this

Dram flip is on me, yw bitches