In post 546, bji wrote: In post 495, bji wrote: In post 494, Irrelephant11 wrote: In post 491, bji wrote:
Sashaddin is the only player I absolutely will not lynch today.
Please towncase the slot, quotes and all
I even would prefer a wall from you in this case
Later. I am at work right now and don't have the time to wall, believe it or not ...
Well actually I don't have any wall to post on this. I was going to try to draw something convincing up from his ISO but after re-reading it a few times I don't think I can.
I just generally find him to be the least scummy player here
, his approach is consistent and rational. His posts seem to be in three general categories: factual observations about the game, casual votes based on those observations, and discussions of game mechanics. If he is scum, he's not trying very hard. He hasn't tried to cast any unjustified doubt on any slots that I saw, and I liked his evidence in scum casing other players.
The bolded feels unjustified and forced, given the sentence before it.
Please quote me one or more for each of the following categories:
-Factual observations about the game
-Casual votes based on those observations
-Discussions of game mechanics
-Evidence in scum casing other players
And then also explain why the first and third of those are town-indicative. Till then, this reads like you saying "Well he's scummy, and that's why I townread him"
In post 548, Clemency wrote:hey look it's those things i wanted to say but was too dumb to formulate in a smart way
thanks bji
owe you one
I doubt anyone thought this was SvS before but I *really* don't think this is SvS
This is the towniest post you've written thus far.
@Persivul do you admit that replacing out is slightly scum-indicative given the patterns of replace-outs on this site y/n?
In post 565, Persivul wrote: In post 562, bji wrote:
I checked my 7 previous games, just going by slots there were 8/18 scum replaces and 21/60 town replaces. I didn't count multiple replaces to a slot, that was just too much work to count, but I don't recall seeing any particular disparity there between scum and town for that metric.
That's 44.4% scum slot replaces and 35.0% town slot replaces. So in my games, scum slots have replaced about 25% more often than town slots.
To be honest I expected an even larger difference before I did the math, but that's probably because I have replaced into three games and twice it was into a scum slot
, so I think that fact made me feel like scum slot replaces were even more likely than they are.
Exactly. People tend to make sweeping statements on such items as if they're fact, when really it's mostly confirmation bias from their own very limited experience.
This was a weird and misreppy way to summarize the Bji post here
In post 568, Persivul wrote:79 - "I think this is a TvT interaction." Easy for scum to say as they know alignments.
130 - "To explain this a little more clearly I found the interaction to be likely TvT overall as an initial and not thought. It was nothing I felt confident about. It's too early to look at an interaction and settle on the players' alignments. The player I would find more likely to be scum in this interaction is clemency if I'm wrong about it being TvT." Oh fuck, I was way too confident earlier and we need mislynches, better dial back that read.
This is a fair reading of the situation. Agree with Garmr that your reads should probably lead you to be voting Creature here, though, not Clemency.
In post 583, Creature wrote:If I was scum, I would just go "hey guys join me on my X wagon" because then town will sheep with no thinking
lol
lolol
In post 606, bji wrote: In post 604, Sashaddin wrote: I like: 62, 75, 140 in a special way. The whole series of 342 to 356 is what strikes me the most though, I don't think a scum would act and speak this way.
434 is... confusing.
I was basing myself on my Excel file because I remember next to nothing because of the pace of the game. I must admit Clemency hasn't produced much else than fluff since 356, which was some tome ago.
OK so this makes it very clear that you are simply emotionally reading Clem's posts to decide if he is town. I find that a very unsatisfying approach. Why are you so sure that Clem can't fake emotion?
This conflicts with your approach to Reaper in post
213 where you explicitly state that posts that are not scumhunting posts from Reaper cannot be used to get a read on him (Clemency gets to be read emotionally, but Reaper gets judged by his scum hunting?).
In post
225 you evaluate Raya on a different set of criteria - whether or not her arguments and counterpoints made sense to you.
While I admit that it is possible that you really are just applying what you think are the best evaluation criteria for each player separately, I do find it very odd that you give Clemency such a pass and don't really evaluate his play using the same or similar rules that you use for other players.
I am also still a bit miffed that you noted so clearly that Garmr's refusal to keep a hammer on me was inconsistent with your other games but you made no effort to explore that.
You have said some things in this game that had me convinced that you were a good guy, or at least that it was worth giving you one night to prove it, but rereading your posts in the light of your recent responses is just eroding my confidence away.
This is an okay post, and sorta relieves some of the Sashaddin/bji team paranoia I was having (though Bji seems smart enough to maybe catch on that it's time to fake some theater as scum. But whatever, that read is mostly unfounded based on this post alone)
@bji curious if you found Sashaddin's replies satisfying?
In post 615, Persivul wrote: In post 580, bji wrote:Hi Garmr and Persivul, join me on my Creature wagon. Then we can get a claim and see who is willing to hammer.
Yuck.
Wagons are good for town for several reasons, but forcing claims isn't one of them. That's a scum mindset.
This is unnecessary shade-casting. This game day has been long and slow, and a claim has to happen eventually