In post 237, Vedith wrote:Well I'm on the PC now and able to discuss, I thought I had something else I wanted to address from LabRat but I think I need to know what posts in particular I need to re address first to make sure we are on the same understanding of what I mean at least.
MainIy this ^ I reaIIy didn’t Iike that p0stIn post 192, Vedith wrote:I think you're missing my point entirely. It's not nitpicky at all. But it still stands that the blank vote was not addressed at the time and there was a large gap where you ignore it.In post 190, LabRat01 wrote:btw, s0me 0f the p0sts y0u qu0ted were the 0ther reads I g0t at the time when I was re-reading stuffIn post 161, Vedith wrote: But you didn't address it at the time.
52 - Vote happens
56 - 57 59 / 61 / 62 / 67 / 78 / 79 / 80 / 81 / 82 - Posts not concerning Moment
83 - Comment against the vote.
By this, the argument to not stay around to discuss is void. You made no attempt to discuss the vote until Post 83.
It’s n0t Iike,,, that p0st was the 0ne and 0nIy, I0I
I mean, if y0u even tried t0 read my p0sts, it’d be 0bvi0us that “I was trying t0 get reads” at that time
It isn’t that hard t0 deduce
Iike, this is getting a bit nitpicky
What you are now referring as trying to get reads would show more as selective reads from yourself instead.
Y0u SRd me f0r n0t making the push immediateIy and I answered by expIaining my pr0gressi0n
Which y0u seem t0 have just denied??? and c0ntinued y0ur SR?
that's just fundamentaIIy bad
Iike, h0w much w0uId y0u have t0 think t0 deduce that y0ur push d0esn’t even make sense?
Iater 0n I said that it I00ked Iike y0u “pushed me f0r being unabIe t0 n0tice scummy/t0wnie p0sts at first gIance” and tbh it’s stiII the m0st reas0nabIe interpretati0n I can get 0ut 0f it rn
And rephrase thatIn post 192, Vedith wrote:What you are now referring as trying to get reads would show more as selective reads from yourself instead.
I’m having a hard time reading that in any way 0ther than: “if y0u reaIIy g0t any reads, they w0uId sh0w differentIy than they did”
Which is just,,, wtf
-------------------------
and yeah, I d0n't mind y0u eIab0rating 0n y0ur read 0n Erag0n
Was the argument ab0ut "n0t reacting immediateIy" y0ur 0nIy reas0n f0r v0ting him 0r did y0u have any 0ther reads?
thx