Lol, you attacked me first.In post 1657, Nimueh wrote:You just answered your own question. It wasn’t at all cool what you said and yes, you absolutely do owe me an apology for that.
I don’t engage with anyone who uses mean-spirited attacks on me.
Sorry, this isn’t working. You continuing to deflect my question about you linking me with Brigitte, is looking really realy bad for you rn.In post 1651, NotMySpamAccount wrote:In post 1648, Nimueh wrote:True, almost all of my posts yesterday could be categorized that way. However, my read on her hasn’t changed.In post 1580, skitter30 wrote:i feel like the ank townread is lazy and/or undeveloped tooIn post 1188, Nimueh wrote:In post 1183, Ankamius wrote:that's fine, just knowing you have is enough to lower the possible people you can be down to two people anywaysI would still tr you here, even if I hadn’t played with you before but obviously that helps.In post 1184, Ankamius wrote:and btw that means that them playing like this is NAIDon't try to use this as an excuse for not answering my questions.
keeeeeep readingIn post 1701, Nimueh wrote:Sorry, this isn’t working. You continuing to deflect my question about you linking me with Brigitte, is looking really realy bad for you rn.In post 1651, NotMySpamAccount wrote:In post 1648, Nimueh wrote:True, almost all of my posts yesterday could be categorized that way. However, my read on her hasn’t changed.In post 1580, skitter30 wrote:i feel like the ank townread is lazy and/or undeveloped tooIn post 1188, Nimueh wrote:In post 1183, Ankamius wrote:that's fine, just knowing you have is enough to lower the possible people you can be down to two people anywaysI would still tr you here, even if I hadn’t played with you before but obviously that helps.In post 1184, Ankamius wrote:and btw that means that them playing like this is NAIDon't try to use this as an excuse for not answering my questions.
Lolwut? Are you trying to get me to switch my vote?In post 1652, Brigitte wrote:Ank,even though I think ur scum.
Ur good people.+5 honorary town points to you.
I'm sure she can read faster than I can post.
Oh wow, Nim says she's town, must be town I guess.
Yeah but I'm not interested in reading a back and forth that's 2 pages apart on both sides
idk aboout useless but fine. have 30 minutes without me. once everyone's caught up, we can have meaningful conversation againIn post 1709, Ankamius wrote:Yeah but I'm not interested in reading a back and forth that's 2 pages apart on both sides
That's almost impossible to keep track of and literally useless
I still am but why are you ignoring NMSA linking me and Brigitte and never explaining why?In post 1660, skitter30 wrote:idk rn
she feels kinda flat for her, and more ... going-through-the-motions-y
that could be a function of being sick, idk
her read on me and on ank are very shallow too
About me or yourself?In post 1665, Ankamius wrote:Actually now that it's pretty much confirmed who Nim is, I wonder if my usual tell will work this game too.
It's already like 20x more readable when you are having them in real timeIn post 1710, NotMySpamAccount wrote:idk aboout useless but fine. have 30 minutes without me. once everyone's caught up, we can have meaningful conversation again
In post 1666, NotMySpamAccount wrote:because you're scummier, especially since you ignored the ultimatum entirelyIn post 1661, Nimueh wrote:But you don’t want to vote the person you think is my “buddy”? Why is that?In post 1610, NotMySpamAccount wrote:All you did was claim that you had answered the wuestion. You never actually showed me or anyone else where you did so. If you do not, in your next three posts, quote me what post had the question, what post had your answer, and why it is valid, I will put you at conf!scum and you will not leave that point until you die.In post 1605, Nimueh wrote:Because I got tired of repeating myself yesterday, ad nauseum.In post 1550, NotMySpamAccount wrote:scumreading nim for refusing to do what I asked, despite making it clear that I would continue to scumreadIn post 1543, skitter30 wrote:unfortunately nothing you're scumreading nim for is aiIn post 1541, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Nim and Brig are scum. At least one of Enter and Ank are town. I'll willingly wagon Nim or Brig at any point.
(not that i know how to read either but yeah)
i'm undecided wrt brig atm
*popcorn*
I am not okay at all with being wrongly sr but if I can take out scum with me and help win the game, I think that’s more important.In post 1670, skitter30 wrote:idk how to answer that without linking to the previous game i played with her and outing her main really tbh
just less invested, and less of an emotional response to being scumread
her reason for townreading me feels like textbook/classic/trite, and not like it's something she really believes/thinks strongly
So, you link me with Brigitte and are absolutely refusing to say why? Like how are you not scum here? How?In post 1681, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Interesting, that you haven't even tried to answer my simple question.In post 1680, Nimueh wrote:Interesting, that you haven’t even tried to refute what I’ve been saying.In post 1624, NotMySpamAccount wrote:*by her own choice
I was tr you until you slipped by linking me with Brigitte. No way you are town here.
If so, why would it?In post 1683, Ankamius wrote:Nim: I 100% know who you are. Does that change your read on me at all?
You can tell by how she sorts.In post 1718, skitter30 wrote:i'm not really seeing it rn
Okay this makes a lot more sense.In post 1721, Nimueh wrote:If so, why would it?In post 1683, Ankamius wrote:Nim: I 100% know who you are. Does that change your read on me at all?
I already figured that out when you read me as NIA which is exactly how I’d have expected you to read me at the time you made that post. That was one of the main reasons I’m strongly tr you. Any other response att, would have made me suspicious.