+
WoooooowIn post 1817, teacher wrote:you are resistant to going Vork for the day?
you and dunn just... woooooow
+
WoooooowIn post 1817, teacher wrote:you are resistant to going Vork for the day?
i shouldn't abuse booze for reaL
>insert pages of me calling bunny a fake claimIn post 1826, nomnomnom wrote:And what I see is a fakeclaim
I want thisIn post 1826, nomnomnom wrote:I will literally self-vote out of the game tomorrow.
I was going to town case vork before shoshin happenedIn post 1817, teacher wrote:@Nom - really I mean it now. Tell me why, in your world with the associatives you have created, you are resistant to going Vork for the day?
Regardless of Shos! alignment, how does it not benefit town?
Town!shos, who has claimed Odd-night [something] cop gets a chance to do her thing. She has to be NK'ed to prevent it. She can (a) be steered to a consensus slot worthy of investigation, and (b) either NK'ed to prevent a slot, or (c) saved to prevent a death if the associative flips green.
Scum!shos can be investigated through the associatives, and has to out some form of result that can be confirmed or debunked tomorrow.
Like Im not seeing the urgency for a D1 lynch with this claim. It is not today.
In this world, Vork+Shos + (Buj?)In post 1831, u r a person 2 wrote:What is the scum team where the only two people you could accuse scum!vorkuta of pocketing are me and nero?
answered these already but:In post 1819, u r a person 2 wrote:okay not quite the same thing. I'd make em fight for my mislynchIn post 1811, skitter30 wrote:yeah the hyperconfidence is weird but like .... if shoshin flips town then they'll be in trouble ... what do u think of the fact that urap said basically the same thing
@shoshin i don't like nero's push on u
but I said I'd concede the scum reads on me =P
UNVOTE:
We're not in a super rush here. I think I'm taking the rest of the night off of this one
@skitter what would you estimate your accuracy is on sho, and what is your current confidence level?
ya i hear ya mate. I just gave you the outline on vorkIn post 1822, teacher wrote:@URAP, I dont know if they have been Overtaken By Events, but Im still looking for the Vork/Nom town cases.
I know what you're thinking and how you are thinking about this.In post 1832, teacher wrote:But tomorrow (a) Town!shos is dead or saved; (b) scum!shos is alive and outs results that can be confirmed (with a possible side benefit of scum! holstering the NK).
No, Vork's lynch does not amount to Sho's lynch. But if you believe the associatives youve claimed, you should view it as an effective way to investigate while covering the 0.001% chance youre wrong (which I see as higher).
that would still leave him picking fights with a bunch of loud, strong willed players, most of whom never saw real pressureIn post 1833, teacher wrote:In this world, Vork+Shos + (Buj?)In post 1831, u r a person 2 wrote:What is the scum team where the only two people you could accuse scum!vorkuta of pocketing are me and nero?
I dont see the fight with Buj as real.
In post 1803, Vorkuta wrote:VC TIME FINALLY
You are letting your past experiences define you this game.In post 1842, teacher wrote:I lean towards believing the claim. In part because I dont. Here Im trying to learn my lesson from the last time I played with Shos, where I denied even a neap clear on her because I didnt like how she played that much.
In post 1843, nomnomnom wrote:This is a contradictory statement
"I don't believe that claim"In post 1844, Vorkuta wrote:In post 1843, nomnomnom wrote:This is a contradictory statementtriggered
ok nom is wrong&bruisedego!town
I invoke "too bad to be scum" with regards to that slot
I understand the whole argument but it's still a contradictory train of thought because that's what lead up to it.In post 1846, Vorkuta wrote:Do you like completely stop reading the sentence/post after you find the firstspelling mistakegrammatical errorperceived flaw in logic?
Because that would explain so much
I never said must be true. I said inclined to believe. Like 60/40. Like I said earlier, much of what shoshin has said about her playstyle is true. Skitter is saying the same. Your reasons on her are more playstyle, which I view as NAI. Like I scumread her, but I've misread her. Yes, I want to cover my ass by not lynching a cop claim that I am uncertain on. I get youre certain. Kudos. Im not. So go back to building a consensus alternative because from the several posts (Skitter, me, Vork, others), Shoshin isnt happening today.In post 1845, nomnomnom wrote:"I don't believe that claim"In post 1844, Vorkuta wrote:In post 1843, nomnomnom wrote:This is a contradictory statementtriggered
ok nom is wrong&bruisedego!town
I invoke "too bad to be scum" with regards to that slot
"therefore it must be true"
are contradictory statements.